苜蓿人工草地高光谱遥感估产模型的研究

doi:10.11686/cyxb20140111

草业学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 84-91.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb20140111

苜蓿人工草地高光谱遥感估产模型的研究

吕小东¹，王建光^1*，孙启忠^2*，姚贵平³，高凤芹²

1.内蒙古农业大学生态环境学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010019
2.中国农业科学院草原研究所,内蒙古呼和浩特010010
3.内蒙古农业大学理学院,内蒙古呼和浩特010019

收稿日期:2013-03-07 出版日期:2014-02-20 发布日期:2014-02-20
通讯作者: E-mail:wangjg8580@163.com, sunqz@126.com
作者简介:吕小东(1984-),男,河北涞源人,在读硕士。E-mail: lxd635@163.com
基金资助:
现代农业产业体系建设专项资金(CARS-35)和科技部“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2012BAD12B09)资助

Research on the hyperspectral remote sensing estimation models for the fresh yield of alfalfa grassland

LV Xiao-dong¹,WANG Jian-guang¹,SUN Qi-zhong²,YAO Gui-ping³,GAO Feng-qin²

1.College of Ecology and Environment,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010019,China;
2.Grassland Research Institute of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Hohhot 010010,China;
3.College of Science,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010019,China

Received:2013-03-07 Online:2014-02-20 Published:2014-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 实地测量了10个苜蓿品种在不同生长时期的冠层高光谱数据,用以消除不同品种间光谱的差异性,并以多个波段的反射率、一阶导数和多种光谱吸收特征参数为光谱参数,运用多种单变量回归模型,对人工苜蓿草地的鲜草产量进行了估算。结果表明,复合、指数等非线性模型要优于线性模型,在同类型的光谱参数中,线性模型决定系数高的参数,其二次型、三次型多项式和复合、乘幂、指数等非线性回归模型的决定系数通常也比较高,且通常高于线性模型;诸多估算模型中,以747 nm处一阶导数为自变量的复合、指数2种形式的估算模型,其相关系数最高为r=0.852,均方根误差为0.466 kg/m²,相对误差为21.14%,其估算精度最高,可作为多个苜蓿品种统一使用的鲜草产量高光谱估算模型。

Abstract: In the field,hyperspectral data and fresh yields in different growth periods of 10 alfalfa (Medicago sativa) varieties were collected and then the reflectance,first derivative spectrum and spectral absorption feature parameters were used as independent variables,to build univariate regression models for estimating the fresh yield of alfalfa. The nonlinear regression equation models,such as quadratic,cubic,compound,power and exponential were better than linear models. Among the spectral parameters of the same type,the parameters which had high coefficient of determinations of the linear model,always had higher coefficients of determination of quadratic,cubic,compound,power and exponential models. Among these estimation models,the compound and exponential estimation models based on the first derivative value at wavelength 747 nm was the most accurate for estimating the fresh yield of alfalfa; The correlation coefficient (r) was 0.852,the root mean square error (RMSE) was 0.466 kg/m²,and the relative error (RE) was 21.14%. The models can be used to estimate the fresh yield of the 10 alfalfa varieties.

中图分类号:

S812.3

吕小东，王建光，孙启忠，姚贵平，高凤芹. 苜蓿人工草地高光谱遥感估产模型的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 84-91.

LV Xiao-dong,WANG Jian-guang,SUN Qi-zhong,YAO Gui-ping,GAO Feng-qin. Research on the hyperspectral remote sensing estimation models for the fresh yield of alfalfa grassland[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(1): 84-91.

参考文献

Reference:
[1]Qi Y Q. Research of Cotton canopy characteristic information by using hyperspectral remote sensing data[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2006. 
[2]Ma Q J. Research of crop canopy structural parameters by using hyperspectral vegetation indices of cotton[D]. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2008. 
[3]Qian Y R, Yu J, Jia Z H, et al. Extraction and analysis of hyper-spectral data from typical desert grassland in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(1): 157-166. 
[4]Kawamura K, Watanabe N, Sakanoue S, et al. Waveband selection using a phased regression with a bootstrap procedure for estimating legume content in a mixed sown pasture[J]. Grassland Science, 2011, 57(2): 81-93. 
[5]Zhao D, Starks P J, Brown M A, et al. Assessment of forage biomass and quality parameters of bermudagrass using proximal sensing of pasture canopy reflectance[J]. Grassland Science, 2007, 53(1): 39-49. 
[6]Mutanga O, Skidmore A K, Prins H H T. Predicting in situ pasture quality in the Kruger National Park, South Africa using continuum removed absorption features[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 89(3): 393-408. 
[7]Post C J, Degloria S D, Cherney J H, et al. Spectral measurements of alfalfa/grass fields related to forage properties and species composition[J]. Plant Nutrition, 2007, 30(11): 1779-1789. 
[8]Zhang K, Wang R Y, Wang X P, et al. Hyperspectral remote sensing estimation models for aboveground fresh biomass of spring wheat on Loess Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2009, 28(6): 1155-1161. 
[9]Zhang K, Guo N, Wang R Y, et al. Hyperspectral remote sensing estimation models for aboveground fresh biomass in Gannan grassland[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2009, 26(11):44-50.
[10]Yang H L, Chen G, Wu J F. Plant nitrogen content of annual ryegrass and spectral reflectance response to nitrogen application level[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(3): 239-244. 
[11]Na Q. Hyperspectral and nutrition of Medicago Sativa L and Bromus Cilitus L. correlation research[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2010. 
[12]Zhou Y T, Fu G, Shen Z X, et al. Estimation model of aboveground biomass in the Northern Tibet Plateau based on remote sensing date[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(1): 120-129. 
[13]Zhang Y N, Niu J M, Zhang Q, et al. A discussion on applications of vegetation index for estimating aboveground biomass of typical steppe[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(1): 229-238. 
[14]Pu R L, Gong P. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and Its Applications[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2000: 52-53. 
[15]Ma Q J, Wang D W, Huang C Y, et al. Hyperspectral estimating modelings of cotton Lai and the above-ground dry matter accumulation[J]. Cotton Science, 2008, 20(3): 217-222. 
[16]Huang C Y, Wang D W, Cao L P, et al. Models for estimating cotton aboveground fresh biomass using hyperspectral data[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 23(3):131-135. 
[17]Bai J H, Li S K, Wang K R, et al. Estimation models of cotton aboveground fresh biomass based on field hyperspectral remote sensing[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(2): 311-316. 
[18]Tan C W, Wang J H, Huang W J, et al. Study on spectral variation of Ltn, Chl and LaI of summer maize[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2004, 24(6):1041-1046.

参考文献：
[1]祁亚琴. 基于高光谱数据提取棉花冠层特征信息的研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2006. 
[2]马勤建. 基于高光谱植被指数的棉花冠层结构参数的估算研究[D]. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2008. 
[3]钱育蓉, 于炯, 贾振红, 等. 新疆典型荒漠草地的高光谱特征提取和分析研究[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(1): 157-166. 
[4]Kawamura K, Watanabe N, Sakanoue S,et al. Waveband selection using a phased regression with a bootstrap procedure for estimating legume content in a mixed sown pasture[J]. Grassland Science, 2011, 57(2): 81-93. 
[5]Zhao D, Starks P J, Brown M A,et al. Assessment of forage biomass and quality parameters of bermudagrass using proximal sensing of pasture canopy reflectance[J]. Grassland Science, 2007, 53(1): 39-49. 
[6]Mutanga O, Skidmore A K, Prins H H T. Predicting in situ pasture quality in the Kruger National Park, South Africa using continuum removed absorption features[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 89(3): 393-408. 
[7]Post C J, Degloria S D, Cherney J H,et al. Spectral measurements of alfalfa/grass fields related to forage properties and species composition[J]. Plant Nutrition, 2007, 30(11): 1779-1789. 
[8]张凯, 王润元, 王小平, 等. 黄土高原春小麦地上鲜生物量高光谱遥感估算模型[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(6): 1155-1161. 
[9]张凯, 郭铌, 王润元, 等. 甘南草地地上生物量的高光谱遥感估算研究[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(11):44-50.
[10]杨红丽, 陈功, 吴建付. 施氮水平对多花黑麦草植株氮含量及反射光谱特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(3): 239-244. 
[11]纳钦. 苜蓿和缘毛雀麦高光谱与营养成分的相关性研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2010. 
[12]周宇庭, 付刚, 沈振西, 等. 藏北典型高寒草甸地上生物量的遥感估算模型[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(1): 120-129. 
[13]张艳楠, 牛建明, 张庆, 等. 植被指数在典型草原生物量遥感估测应用中的问题探讨[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(1): 229-238. 
[14]浦瑞良, 宫鹏. 高光谱及其应用[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2000: 52-53. 
[15]马勤建, 王登伟, 黄春燕, 等. 棉花叶面积指数和地上干物质积累量的高光谱估算模型研究[J]. 棉花学报, 2008, 20(3): 217-222. 
[16]黄春燕, 王登伟, 曹连莆, 等. 棉花地上鲜生物量的高光谱估算模型研究[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(3):131-135. 
[17]柏军华, 李少昆, 王克如, 等. 基于近地高光谱棉花生物量遥感估算模型[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(2): 311-316. 
[18]谭昌伟, 王纪华, 黄文江, 等. 夏玉米叶片全氮、叶绿素及叶面积指数的光谱响应研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2004, 24(6):1041-1046.

苜蓿人工草地高光谱遥感估产模型的研究

Research on the hyperspectral remote sensing estimation models for the fresh yield of alfalfa grassland

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	杨杨，石超，郭旭生. 高寒草甸魏斯氏乳酸菌的分离鉴定及理化特性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 266-275.
[2]	修丽娜,冯琦胜,梁天刚. 基于CSCS方法的甘南自然植被NDVI时空分布特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(4): 239-246.
[3]	谢开云,赵云,李向林,何峰,万里强,王丹,韩冬梅. 豆-禾混播草地种间关系研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(3): 284-.
[4]	徐鹏彬,邓建明,赵长明. 甘肃尕海湿地不同海拔草地群落组分及物种多样性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(2): 219-226.
[5]	王圆圆,王猛,李贵才,王军邦,杨忠东,戎志国. 基于野外观测和TM数据的锡林浩特典型草原MODIS/LAI产品验证[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(4): 252-260.
[6]	魏淑珍,王菲凤,张江山. 基于SOFM网络法的天然草地分类[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(1): 175-182.
[7]	赵忠,何毅,李青,贾生福,杨鹏翼,金赐福,杨学兰,孙晓云,李炬,顾自林,屈勇,张卫军,乔永松,王军,杨生禄. 肃南裕固族自治县草原资源调查[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(6): 231-247.
[8]	文都日乐,李刚,张静妮,赖欣,易津,范国艳,杨殿林. 呼伦贝尔不同草地类型土壤微生物量及土壤酶活性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(5): 94-102.
[9]	赵忠,何毅,李青,杨鹏翼,金赐福,杨学兰,孙晓云,顾自林, 张卫军,王军,屈勇,柴永青,泽德,那·巴特尔. 肃南、肃北草地类型及草地植物物种多样性现状[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(5): 227-238.
[10]	李斌,李素清²,张金屯³. 云顶山亚高山草甸优势种群生态位研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(1): 6-13.
[11]	张金屯,聂二保,向春玲. 五台山亚高山草甸的人工神经网络分类与排序[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(4): 35-40.
[12]	呼格吉勒图，杨劼，宝音陶格涛，包青海. 不同干扰对典型草原群落物种多样性和生物量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(3): 6-11.
[13]	李红梅,马玉寿. 改进的综合顺序分类法在青海草地分类中的应用[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 76-82.