干旱胁迫对新疆三个优势牧草种的光合特性与水分利用效率的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2015578

草业学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (10): 86-94.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2015578

干旱胁迫对新疆三个优势牧草种的光合特性与水分利用效率的影响

覃凤飞¹, 沈益新¹, 李兰海^{2, *}, 胡增运², 程亮¹, 马旭龙¹, 陈青青¹, 王凌越¹

1.南京农业大学草业学院,江苏南京 210095;
2.中国科学院新疆生态与地理研究所干旱区水循环与水利用实验室,新疆乌鲁木齐 830011

收稿日期:2015-12-29 出版日期:2016-10-20 发布日期:2016-10-20
通讯作者: E-mail:lilh@ms.xjb.ac.cn
作者简介:覃凤飞(1973-),女,广西南宁人,讲师,博士。E-mail:qinffei@njau.edu.cn
基金资助:
基金项目:新疆维吾尔自治区重点实验室干旱区水循环与水利用实验室开放课题(XJYS0907-2011-01),“十二五”江苏省重点学科建设项目-草学和南京农业大学大学生实践创新计划训练项目(1215A06)资助

Effect of drought stress on the photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of three dominant forage grasses in Sinkiang

QIN Feng-Fei¹, SHEN Yi-Xin¹, LI Lan-Hai^{2, *}, HU Zeng-Yun², CHENG Liang¹, MA Xu-Long¹, CHEN Qing-Qing¹, WANG Ling-Yue¹

1.College of Prataculturae Science, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;
2.Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China

Received:2015-12-29 Online:2016-10-20 Published:2016-10-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过盆栽试验,研究了不同土壤含水量条件下(田间持水量的80%、60%和30%)新疆地区天然草地3个优势牧草种(无芒雀麦、草地早熟禾和鸭茅)叶片的光合生理特性及叶片和单株水分利用效率,以探讨不同优势牧草种对干旱胁迫的适应机制。结果表明:随干旱胁迫加剧,3个牧草种的C_i日平均值呈上升趋势,G_s、P_n、T_r 、P_n/C_i日平均值和日平均耗水量呈下降趋势,但物种间各参数变幅存在差异;草地早熟禾日平均生物产量呈明显下降趋势(P<0.05),鸭茅和无芒雀麦无明显变化(P>0.05);鸭茅的WUE_i日平均值和WUE_ET无显著变化(P>0.05),无芒雀麦和草地早熟禾呈明显下降趋势(P<0.05)。3个牧草种的WUE_ET均与其日平均累积生物量显著正相关(P<0.05),草地早熟禾的WUE_ET与其T_r日平均值和日平均耗水量亦显著正相关(P<0.05)。3个牧草种的叶片和单株水分利用效率随土壤含水量下降具有不同的变化趋势,预示着3个物种对干旱生境的适应不仅取决于其水分利用效率的大小,还可能与其生物学特性和生活史策略有关。

Abstract: This paper explores the adaptive mechanisms of three forage grasses (Bromus inermis, Dactylis glomerata and Poa pratensis) that are predominant in Sinkiang natural grasslands. Using pot experiment methods, drought stress was simulated to determine the effects of three different soil water contents levels (80%, 60% and 30% of field water capacity) on leaf photo-physiological characteristics and water use efficiency (WUE). With decreasing soil water contents, the daily average value of intercellular CO₂ (C_i) in the three grasses increased. The daily average values of stomatal conductance (G_s), net photosynthetic rate (P_n), transpiration rate (T_r), the ratio of P_n to C_i and evapotranspiration decreased, but the variation ranges of these characteristics differed across the three grasses. As drought stress increased, the daily average accumulated biomass of P. pratensis significantly decreased (P<0.05), but there was no obvious change in the other two grasses (P>0.05). The net water use efficiency (WUE_ET) and the daily average value of instantaneous water use efficiency (WUE_i) of D. glomerata changed very little (P>0.05), but in the other two grasses both WUE_ET and WUE_i significantly decreased (P<0.05). The WUE_ET of P. pratensis was significantly positively correlated with its daily average values for T_r and evapotranspiration (P<0.05). The WUE_ET of the three forage grasses was significantly positively correlated with their daily average accumulated biomass (P<0.05). The WUE_i and WUE_ET of the three grasses followed different change trends with the decrease in soil water contents. This study suggests that the adaptability of the three forage grasses to arid environments depends not only on their WUE but is also related to their biological characteristics and life history strategies.

覃凤飞, 沈益新, 李兰海, 胡增运, 程亮, 马旭龙, 陈青青, 王凌越. 干旱胁迫对新疆三个优势牧草种的光合特性与水分利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(10): 86-94.

QIN Feng-Fei, SHEN Yi-Xin, LI Lan-Hai, HU Zeng-Yun, CHENG Liang, MA Xu-Long, CHEN Qing-Qing, WANG Ling-Yue. Effect of drought stress on the photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of three dominant forage grasses in Sinkiang[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(10): 86-94.

参考文献

[1] Huang Z B, Shan L. Research progression on water use efficiency and its physio-ecological mechanism. Eco-Agriculture Research, 1998, 16(4): 19-23.
[2] Zhang Z B, Shan L. Research development in estimation models of crop water use efficiency and transpiration and evaporation. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 1997, 15(1): 73-78.
[3] Liu W Z. Dynamic interrelations of crop production, water consumption and water use efficiency. Journal of Natural Resources, 1998, 13(1): 23-27.
[4] Feng Y, Zhang W D, Li X J. Composition and vertical distribution of plant resources at the middle section on the northern slope of Tianshan mountain. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(5): 542-546.
[5] Ji Y, Zhang X Q, Peng Y, et al . Effects of drought stress on the root growth and photosynthetic characters of Dactylis glomerata seedlings. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(10): 2763-2769.
[6] Guo Y P, Mi F G, Yan L J, et al . Physiological response to drought stresses and drought resistances evaluation of different Kentucky bluegrass varieties. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 220-228.
[7] Huang L L, Wang J, Hu S R. Effects of drought stress on the photosynthesis of Bromus stamineus and B. inermis . Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 13(2): 1-3.
[8] Li Y, Shi S L, Wang Z, et al . Physiological study on drought resistance of Dactylis glomerata under drought stress at seedling stage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007, 29(2): 20-27.
[9] Zhang X, Liu Q S, Shi W G, et al . Analysis of genetic diversity of 25 Bromus inermis accessions based on ISSR. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(3): 104-107.
[10] Zhang X H, Zhu J Z, Wang T, et al . Study on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of Dactylis glomerata L. in the northern slope of Tianshan mountain. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2013, 21(3): 534-538.
[11] Tezara W, Mitchell V J, Driscoll S D, et al . Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP. Nature, 1999, 401: 914-917.
[12] Cao S K, Feng Q, Si J H, et al . Summary on the plant water use efficiency at leaf level. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(7): 3882-3892.
[13] Yao B J. Plant Structure, Function and Adaptation[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1987.
[14] Qin P, Yang Z W, Kong Z Y. Effects of drought stress on tobacco photosynthesis in vigorous growing period. Subtropical Plant Science, 2004, 33(2): 5-7.
[15] Schulze E D. Carbon dioxide and water exchange in response to drought in the atmosphere and in the soil. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1986, 37: 247-274.
[16] Zhang G C, Liu X, He K N, et al . Responses of gas exchange parameters of goldspur apple tree to soil water variation. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2004, 28(1): 66-72.
[17] Farquar G D, Sharkey T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1982, 33: 317-345.
[18] Liao J X, Wang G X. The diurnal variations of photosynthetic rate and water use efficiency in Setaria italica leaves. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica, 1999, 25(4): 362-368.
[19] Shan L, Xu M. Water-saving agriculture and its physic-ecological bases. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1991, 2(1): 70-76.
[20] Jiang G M, Dong M. A comparative study on photosynthesis and water use efficiency between clonal and non-clonal plant species along the Northeast China Transect (NECT). Acta Botanica Sinica, 2000, 42(8): 855-863.
[21] Picotte J, Rosenthal D, Rhode J, et al . Plastic responses to temporal variation in moisture availability: Consequences for water use efficiency and plant performance. Oecologia, 2007, 153: 821-832.
[22] Raschke K, Resemann A. The midday depression of CO 2 assimilation in leaves of Arbutus unedo L.: Diurnal changes in photosynthetic capacity related to changes in temperature and humidity. Planta, 1986, 168: 546-558.
[23] He Q, Li J Y, Chen X Y, et al . Water utilization and its distribution in day and night in different Populus tomentosa clones. Journal of South China Agricultural University, 2010, 31(1): 47-50.
[24] Impa S M, Nadaradjan S, Boominathan P, et al . Carbon isotope discrimination accurately reflects variability in WUE measured at a whole plant level in rice. Crop Science, 2005, 45(6): 2517-2522.
[25] Araus J L, Villegas D, Aparicio N, et al . Environmental factors determining carbon isotope discrimination and yield in durum wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Crop Science, 2003, 43(1): 170-180.
[26] Liu Y L. Plant Water Stress Physiology[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1992.
[27] Jia S X. Forage Floras of China[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1987.
[28] Richards R A, Rebetzke G J, Condon A G, et al . Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Science, 2002, 42: 111-121.
[29] Gimenez C, Mitchell V G, Lawlor D W. Regulation of photosynthetic rate of two sunflower hybrids underwater stress. Plant Physiology, 1992, 98(2): 516-524.
[30] 黄占斌, 山仑. 水分利用效率及其生理生态机理研究进展. 生态农业研究, 1998, 16(4): 19-23.
[31] 张正斌, 山仑. 作物水分利用效率和蒸发蒸腾估算模型的研究进展. 干旱地区农业研究, 1997, 15(1): 73-78.
[32] 刘文兆. 作物生产、水分消耗与水分利用效率间的动态联系. 自然资源学报, 1998, 13(1): 23-27.
[33] 冯缨, 张卫东, 李新杰. 天山北坡中段草地植物资源构成及垂直分布. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(5): 542-546.
[34] 季杨, 张新全, 彭燕, 等. 干旱胁迫对鸭茅幼苗根系生长及光合特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(10): 2763-2769.
[35] 郭郁频, 米福贵, 闫利军, 等. 不同早熟禾品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4): 220-228.
[36] 黄丽丽, 汪季, 胡生荣. 干旱胁迫对2种无芒雀麦光合作用的影响. 河北农业科学, 2009, 13(2): 1-3.
[37] 李源, 师尚礼, 王赞, 等. 干旱胁迫下鸭茅苗期抗旱性生理研究. 中国草地学报, 2007, 29(2): 20-27.
[38] 张雪, 刘青松, 师文贵, 等. 25份无芒雀麦种质资源遗传多样性的ISSR分析. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(3): 104-107.
[39] 张鲜花, 朱进忠, 王特, 等. 天山北坡东西部山地野生鸭茅部分生理生化指标分异性的研究. 草地学报, 2013, 21(3): 534-538.
[40] 曹生奎, 冯起, 司建华, 等. 植物叶片水分利用效率研究综述. 生态学报, 2009, 29(7): 3882-3892.
[41] 姚壁君. 植物结构、功能和适应[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987.
[42] 覃鹏, 杨志稳, 孔治有. 干旱对烟草旺长期光合作用的影响. 亚热带植物科学, 2004, 33(2): 5-7.
[43] 张光灿, 刘霞, 贺康宁, 等. 金矮生苹果叶片气体交换参数对土壤水分的响应. 植物生态学报, 2004, 28(1): 66-72.
[44] 廖建雄, 王根轩. 谷子叶片光合速率日变化及水分利用效率. 植物生理学报, 1999, 25(4): 362-368.
[45] 山仑, 徐萌. 节水农业及其生理生态基础. 应用生态学报, 1991, 2(1): 70-76.
[46] 蒋高明, 董鸣. 沿中国东北样(NECT)分布的若干克隆植物与非克隆植物光合速率与水分利用效率的比较. 植物学报, 2000, 42(8): 855-863.
[47] 何茜, 李吉跃, 陈晓阳, 等. 毛白杨不同无性系苗木耗水量及其昼夜分配. 华南农业大学学报, 2010, 31(1): 47-50.
[48] 刘友良. 植物水分逆境生理[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1992.
[49] 贾慎修. 中国饲用植物志[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1987.

干旱胁迫对新疆三个优势牧草种的光合特性与水分利用效率的影响

Effect of drought stress on the photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of three dominant forage grasses in Sinkiang

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

编辑推荐

Metrics