Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 127-138.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2021367
Shi-ping SU(), Yi LI(), Xiao-e LIU, Pei-fang CHONG, Li-shan SHAN, You-li HOU
Received:
2021-10-09
Revised:
2021-11-29
Online:
2022-06-20
Published:
2022-05-11
Contact:
Yi LI
Shi-ping SU, Yi LI, Xiao-e LIU, Pei-fang CHONG, Li-shan SHAN, You-li HOU. A study of the mechanism of drought stress alleviation by exogenous proline applied to Reaumuria soongorica[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6): 127-138.
项目 Item | 株高净生长量 Net growth of height (cm) | 地径净生长量 Net growth of ground diameter (mm) | 侧芽萌发数 Number of lateral bud germination (No.) | 侧芽净生长量 Net growth of lateral bud (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
年份Year | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Y1 | 1.73b | 0.20b | 2.80b | 1.07b |
Y2 | 2.75a | 0.28a | 4.50a | 2.36a |
脯氨酸处理 Pro treatment (P) | ** | ** | NS | ** |
P1 | 2.43a | 0.26a | 3.17a | 1.65bc |
P2 | 2.48a | 0.27a | 3.67a | 1.87a |
P3 | 2.43a | 0.24ab | 3.50a | 1.73ab |
P4 | 2.05b | 0.22bc | 3.50a | 1.67bc |
P5 | 1.80c | 0.20c | 3.33a | 1.55c |
Table 1 Effects of exogenous Pro treatment on growth traits of R. soongorica
项目 Item | 株高净生长量 Net growth of height (cm) | 地径净生长量 Net growth of ground diameter (mm) | 侧芽萌发数 Number of lateral bud germination (No.) | 侧芽净生长量 Net growth of lateral bud (cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|
年份Year | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Y1 | 1.73b | 0.20b | 2.80b | 1.07b |
Y2 | 2.75a | 0.28a | 4.50a | 2.36a |
脯氨酸处理 Pro treatment (P) | ** | ** | NS | ** |
P1 | 2.43a | 0.26a | 3.17a | 1.65bc |
P2 | 2.48a | 0.27a | 3.67a | 1.87a |
P3 | 2.43a | 0.24ab | 3.50a | 1.73ab |
P4 | 2.05b | 0.22bc | 3.50a | 1.67bc |
P5 | 1.80c | 0.20c | 3.33a | 1.55c |
项目 Item | 可溶性蛋白含量 Soluble protein content (SP, mg·g-1 FW) | 游离脯氨酸含量 Free proline content (Pro, μg·g-1 FW) | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content (SS, mg·g-1 FW) | 超氧化物歧化酶活性 Superoxide dismutase activity (SOD, U·g-1 FW) | 过氧化氢酶活性 Catalase activity (CAT, U·g-1 FW·min-1) | 过氧化物酶活性 Peroxidase activity (POD, U·g-1 FW·min-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年份Year | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Y1 | 6.76b | 540.41b | 5.14b | 2587.94b | 79.35b | 4.43b |
Y2 | 7.69a | 644.02a | 7.14a | 2887.40a | 98.29a | 5.36a |
D | ** | NS | ** | ** | ** | ** |
D0 | 7.50a | 499.42a | 7.09a | 2733.00b | 76.91b | 4.60bc |
D1 | 7.97a | 667.62a | 5.14b | 2925.20a | 94.56a | 5.50ab |
D3 | 7.93a | 656.17a | 5.73b | 2727.01b | 104.97a | 5.90a |
D6 | 6.38b | 601.13a | 7.33a | 2757.78b | 91.52a | 4.61bc |
D9 | 6.34b | 536.73a | 5.42b | 2545.35c | 76.14b | 3.86c |
P | ** | ** | NS | * | ** | ** |
P1 | 7.39ab | 784.52a | 5.89ab | 2805.42a | 97.60ab | 4.97bc |
P2 | 6.15c | 436.35c | 6.78a | 2815.33a | 106.70a | 6.37a |
P3 | 7.99a | 788.67a | 5.43b | 2767.66a | 87.57bc | 5.29b |
P4 | 6.93c | 387.14c | 6.13ab | 2730.05a | 81.54cd | 4.19cd |
P5 | 7.67ab | 564.40b | 6.47ab | 2569.89b | 70.69d | 3.65d |
P×D | ||||||
P1×D0 | 9.15a | 897.69a | 8.74a | 2752.96b | 82.11b | 4.70bc |
P1×D1 | 8.37ab | 880.20a | 4.54b | 3002.83a | 93.95ab | 5.66ab |
P1×D3 | 7.18abc | 653.14c | 5.25b | 2845.83ab | 113.31a | 6.94a |
P1×D6 | 6.48bc | 737.23b | 5.85b | 2783.37ab | 112.35a | 4.12bc |
P1×D9 | 5.76c | 754.32b | 5.08b | 2642.11ab | 86.25b | 3.41c |
P2×D0 | 5.13c | 240.67c | 7.17ab | 2594.25b | 79.00b | 4.88b |
P2×D1 | 7.10a | 422.77b | 5.52b | 2939.56a | 107.25a | 6.65ab |
P2×D3 | 6.41ab | 437.40b | 5.39b | 2997.41a | 120.36a | 7.62a |
P2×D6 | 6.73a | 524.77a | 9.14a | 3001.84a | 123.66a | 7.21ab |
P2×D9 | 5.36bc | 556.12a | 6.71b | 2543.60b | 103.22a | 5.48ab |
P3×D0 | 7.26b | 609.30d | 5.68ab | 2727.48ab | 73.84b | 4.48c |
P3×D1 | 8.58a | 837.65b | 3.88b | 2981.58a | 90.75b | 6.08ab |
P3×D3 | 8.70a | 922.83a | 6.00ab | 2829.04ab | 107.88a | 7.20a |
P3×D6 | 8.11ab | 856.90ab | 7.19a | 2696.50b | 81.45b | 4.99bc |
P3×D9 | 7.29b | 716.65c | 4.42b | 2603.69b | 83.92b | 3.71c |
P4×D0 | 7.61a | 229.59c | 7.03ab | 2852.31ab | 79.78b | 4.30a |
P4×D1 | 7.43a | 303.23b | 4.38c | 2985.05a | 83.68b | 4.51a |
P4×D3 | 8.29a | 601.54a | 5.14bc | 2589.46b | 99.65a | 4.88a |
P4×D6 | 4.94b | 571.01a | 8.37a | 2733.60ab | 80.80b | 4.08a |
P4×D9 | 6.39ab | 230.31c | 5.72bc | 2489.82b | 63.78c | 3.17a |
P5×D0 | 8.38a | 519.87c | 6.82a | 2738.02a | 69.81bc | 4.65a |
P5×D1 | 8.40a | 894.27a | 7.38a | 2716.98a | 97.18a | 4.59a |
P5×D3 | 9.05a | 665.93b | 6.86a | 2373.33b | 83.65ab | 2.83b |
P5×D6 | 5.62c | 315.72e | 6.11ab | 2573.59ab | 59.32cd | 2.63b |
P5×D9 | 6.91b | 426.23d | 5.19b | 2447.55b | 43.51d | 3.52ab |
Table 2 Effects of exogenous Pro on antioxidant enzyme system and osmotic regulation system of R. soongorica
项目 Item | 可溶性蛋白含量 Soluble protein content (SP, mg·g-1 FW) | 游离脯氨酸含量 Free proline content (Pro, μg·g-1 FW) | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content (SS, mg·g-1 FW) | 超氧化物歧化酶活性 Superoxide dismutase activity (SOD, U·g-1 FW) | 过氧化氢酶活性 Catalase activity (CAT, U·g-1 FW·min-1) | 过氧化物酶活性 Peroxidase activity (POD, U·g-1 FW·min-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
年份Year | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Y1 | 6.76b | 540.41b | 5.14b | 2587.94b | 79.35b | 4.43b |
Y2 | 7.69a | 644.02a | 7.14a | 2887.40a | 98.29a | 5.36a |
D | ** | NS | ** | ** | ** | ** |
D0 | 7.50a | 499.42a | 7.09a | 2733.00b | 76.91b | 4.60bc |
D1 | 7.97a | 667.62a | 5.14b | 2925.20a | 94.56a | 5.50ab |
D3 | 7.93a | 656.17a | 5.73b | 2727.01b | 104.97a | 5.90a |
D6 | 6.38b | 601.13a | 7.33a | 2757.78b | 91.52a | 4.61bc |
D9 | 6.34b | 536.73a | 5.42b | 2545.35c | 76.14b | 3.86c |
P | ** | ** | NS | * | ** | ** |
P1 | 7.39ab | 784.52a | 5.89ab | 2805.42a | 97.60ab | 4.97bc |
P2 | 6.15c | 436.35c | 6.78a | 2815.33a | 106.70a | 6.37a |
P3 | 7.99a | 788.67a | 5.43b | 2767.66a | 87.57bc | 5.29b |
P4 | 6.93c | 387.14c | 6.13ab | 2730.05a | 81.54cd | 4.19cd |
P5 | 7.67ab | 564.40b | 6.47ab | 2569.89b | 70.69d | 3.65d |
P×D | ||||||
P1×D0 | 9.15a | 897.69a | 8.74a | 2752.96b | 82.11b | 4.70bc |
P1×D1 | 8.37ab | 880.20a | 4.54b | 3002.83a | 93.95ab | 5.66ab |
P1×D3 | 7.18abc | 653.14c | 5.25b | 2845.83ab | 113.31a | 6.94a |
P1×D6 | 6.48bc | 737.23b | 5.85b | 2783.37ab | 112.35a | 4.12bc |
P1×D9 | 5.76c | 754.32b | 5.08b | 2642.11ab | 86.25b | 3.41c |
P2×D0 | 5.13c | 240.67c | 7.17ab | 2594.25b | 79.00b | 4.88b |
P2×D1 | 7.10a | 422.77b | 5.52b | 2939.56a | 107.25a | 6.65ab |
P2×D3 | 6.41ab | 437.40b | 5.39b | 2997.41a | 120.36a | 7.62a |
P2×D6 | 6.73a | 524.77a | 9.14a | 3001.84a | 123.66a | 7.21ab |
P2×D9 | 5.36bc | 556.12a | 6.71b | 2543.60b | 103.22a | 5.48ab |
P3×D0 | 7.26b | 609.30d | 5.68ab | 2727.48ab | 73.84b | 4.48c |
P3×D1 | 8.58a | 837.65b | 3.88b | 2981.58a | 90.75b | 6.08ab |
P3×D3 | 8.70a | 922.83a | 6.00ab | 2829.04ab | 107.88a | 7.20a |
P3×D6 | 8.11ab | 856.90ab | 7.19a | 2696.50b | 81.45b | 4.99bc |
P3×D9 | 7.29b | 716.65c | 4.42b | 2603.69b | 83.92b | 3.71c |
P4×D0 | 7.61a | 229.59c | 7.03ab | 2852.31ab | 79.78b | 4.30a |
P4×D1 | 7.43a | 303.23b | 4.38c | 2985.05a | 83.68b | 4.51a |
P4×D3 | 8.29a | 601.54a | 5.14bc | 2589.46b | 99.65a | 4.88a |
P4×D6 | 4.94b | 571.01a | 8.37a | 2733.60ab | 80.80b | 4.08a |
P4×D9 | 6.39ab | 230.31c | 5.72bc | 2489.82b | 63.78c | 3.17a |
P5×D0 | 8.38a | 519.87c | 6.82a | 2738.02a | 69.81bc | 4.65a |
P5×D1 | 8.40a | 894.27a | 7.38a | 2716.98a | 97.18a | 4.59a |
P5×D3 | 9.05a | 665.93b | 6.86a | 2373.33b | 83.65ab | 2.83b |
P5×D6 | 5.62c | 315.72e | 6.11ab | 2573.59ab | 59.32cd | 2.63b |
P5×D9 | 6.91b | 426.23d | 5.19b | 2447.55b | 43.51d | 3.52ab |
项目 Item | 总叶绿素含量 Total chlorophyll content, Chl(a+b), (mg·g-1 FW) | 叶绿素a含量 Chlorophyll a content, Chla (mg·g-1 FW) | 叶绿素b含量 Chlorophyll b content, Chlb (mg·g-1 FW) | 叶绿素a/b Chlorophyll a/b, Chl a/b |
---|---|---|---|---|
年份Year | ** | ** | ** | NS |
Y1 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.15 | 4.40 |
Y2 | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.17 | 4.41 |
D | ** | ** | ** | ** |
D0 | 0.87a | 0.69a | 0.18a | 3.80c |
D1 | 0.87a | 0.70a | 0.17a | 4.03c |
D3 | 0.86ab | 0.69a | 0.17ab | 4.23bc |
D6 | 0.84b | 0.68a | 0.15b | 4.58b |
D9 | 0.78c | 0.65b | 0.12b | 5.41a |
P | ** | ** | ** | ** |
P1 | 0.83b | 0.68ab | 0.15b | 4.59b |
P2 | 0.87ab | 0.69a | 0.18a | 3.94c |
P3 | 0.87a | 0.69a | 0.18a | 4.02bc |
P4 | 0.85ab | 0.69a | 0.16ab | 4.24bc |
P5 | 0.80c | 0.66b | 0.13c | 5.24a |
P×D | ||||
P1×D0 | 0.87ab | 0.68ab | 0.18a | 3.73c |
P1×D1 | 0.88a | 0.70a | 0.17a | 4.06bc |
P1×D3 | 0.84ab | 0.69a | 0.15ab | 4.53bc |
P1×D6 | 0.81bc | 0.67ab | 0.14b | 4.74b |
P1×D9 | 0.76c | 0.65b | 0.11c | 5.90a |
P2×D0 | 0.86b | 0.68b | 0.18a | 3.79b |
P2×D1 | 0.89ab | 0.70ab | 0.19a | 3.73b |
P2×D3 | 0.91a | 0.71a | 0.20a | 3.61b |
P2×D6 | 0.87ab | 0.69ab | 0.18a | 3.89b |
P2×D9 | 0.81c | 0.67b | 0.14b | 4.69a |
P3×D0 | 0.88a | 0.70a | 0.18a | 3.94b |
P3×D1 | 0.89a | 0.70a | 0.19a | 3.77b |
P3×D3 | 0.90a | 0.71a | 0.19a | 3.72b |
P3×D6 | 0.87a | 0.69ab | 0.18a | 3.85b |
P3×D9 | 0.81b | 0.67b | 0.14b | 4.83a |
P4×D0 | 0.88a | 0.69a | 0.19a | 3.74b |
P4×D1 | 0.86a | 0.69a | 0.18a | 3.94b |
P4×D3 | 0.86a | 0.69a | 0.17a | 3.99b |
P4×D6 | 0.85a | 0.69a | 0.16a | 4.25b |
P4×D9 | 0.79b | 0.67a | 0.13b | 5.30a |
P5×D0 | 0.88a | 0.70a | 0.18a | 3.80c |
P5×D1 | 0.84a | 0.69a | 0.15b | 4.66bc |
P5×D3 | 0.78b | 0.65a | 0.12bc | 5.28ab |
P5×D6 | 0.77b | 0.66a | 0.11c | 6.15a |
P5×D9 | 0.70c | 0.61b | 0.10c | 6.31a |
Table 3 Effects of exogenous Pro on photosynthetic pigments of R. soongorica
项目 Item | 总叶绿素含量 Total chlorophyll content, Chl(a+b), (mg·g-1 FW) | 叶绿素a含量 Chlorophyll a content, Chla (mg·g-1 FW) | 叶绿素b含量 Chlorophyll b content, Chlb (mg·g-1 FW) | 叶绿素a/b Chlorophyll a/b, Chl a/b |
---|---|---|---|---|
年份Year | ** | ** | ** | NS |
Y1 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 0.15 | 4.40 |
Y2 | 0.89 | 0.72 | 0.17 | 4.41 |
D | ** | ** | ** | ** |
D0 | 0.87a | 0.69a | 0.18a | 3.80c |
D1 | 0.87a | 0.70a | 0.17a | 4.03c |
D3 | 0.86ab | 0.69a | 0.17ab | 4.23bc |
D6 | 0.84b | 0.68a | 0.15b | 4.58b |
D9 | 0.78c | 0.65b | 0.12b | 5.41a |
P | ** | ** | ** | ** |
P1 | 0.83b | 0.68ab | 0.15b | 4.59b |
P2 | 0.87ab | 0.69a | 0.18a | 3.94c |
P3 | 0.87a | 0.69a | 0.18a | 4.02bc |
P4 | 0.85ab | 0.69a | 0.16ab | 4.24bc |
P5 | 0.80c | 0.66b | 0.13c | 5.24a |
P×D | ||||
P1×D0 | 0.87ab | 0.68ab | 0.18a | 3.73c |
P1×D1 | 0.88a | 0.70a | 0.17a | 4.06bc |
P1×D3 | 0.84ab | 0.69a | 0.15ab | 4.53bc |
P1×D6 | 0.81bc | 0.67ab | 0.14b | 4.74b |
P1×D9 | 0.76c | 0.65b | 0.11c | 5.90a |
P2×D0 | 0.86b | 0.68b | 0.18a | 3.79b |
P2×D1 | 0.89ab | 0.70ab | 0.19a | 3.73b |
P2×D3 | 0.91a | 0.71a | 0.20a | 3.61b |
P2×D6 | 0.87ab | 0.69ab | 0.18a | 3.89b |
P2×D9 | 0.81c | 0.67b | 0.14b | 4.69a |
P3×D0 | 0.88a | 0.70a | 0.18a | 3.94b |
P3×D1 | 0.89a | 0.70a | 0.19a | 3.77b |
P3×D3 | 0.90a | 0.71a | 0.19a | 3.72b |
P3×D6 | 0.87a | 0.69ab | 0.18a | 3.85b |
P3×D9 | 0.81b | 0.67b | 0.14b | 4.83a |
P4×D0 | 0.88a | 0.69a | 0.19a | 3.74b |
P4×D1 | 0.86a | 0.69a | 0.18a | 3.94b |
P4×D3 | 0.86a | 0.69a | 0.17a | 3.99b |
P4×D6 | 0.85a | 0.69a | 0.16a | 4.25b |
P4×D9 | 0.79b | 0.67a | 0.13b | 5.30a |
P5×D0 | 0.88a | 0.70a | 0.18a | 3.80c |
P5×D1 | 0.84a | 0.69a | 0.15b | 4.66bc |
P5×D3 | 0.78b | 0.65a | 0.12bc | 5.28ab |
P5×D6 | 0.77b | 0.66a | 0.11c | 6.15a |
P5×D9 | 0.70c | 0.61b | 0.10c | 6.31a |
项目 Item | 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate (Pn, μmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Stomatal conductance (Gs, mol·m-2·s-1) | 蒸腾速率 Transpiration rate (Tr, mmol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, μmol·mol-1) | 水分利用效率 Water use efficiency (WUE, μmol CO2·mol-1 H2O) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年份Year | * | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Y1 | 2.829b | 0.042b | 1.437b | 168.314b | 1.816b |
Y2 | 3.011a | 0.052a | 1.618a | 186.466a | 1.997a |
D | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
D0 | 3.173a | 0.050a | 1.588a | 184.867a | 2.000a |
D1 | 3.233a | 0.050a | 1.567a | 187.333a | 2.062a |
D3 | 3.068a | 0.048ab | 1.545ab | 181.867a | 1.982a |
D6 | 2.743b | 0.045b | 1.495b | 169.800b | 1.831b |
D9 | 2.383c | 0.042c | 1.443c | 163.533b | 1.660c |
P | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
P1 | 2.885b | 0.046bc | 1.518bc | 178.533ab | 1.896a |
P2 | 3.218a | 0.050a | 1.586a | 188.400a | 2.027a |
P3 | 3.050ab | 0.049ab | 1.558ab | 181.400ab | 1.956a |
P4 | 2.897b | 0.046c | 1.515bc | 176.467b | 1.909a |
P5 | 2.549c | 0.044c | 1.462c | 162.600c | 1.746b |
P×D | |||||
P1×D0 | 3.160a | 0.049a | 1.587a | 184.000ab | 1.994a |
P1×D1 | 3.233a | 0.049a | 1.567a | 191.667a | 2.061a |
P1×D3 | 3.037ab | 0.046ab | 1.537ab | 178.000abc | 1.976a |
P1×D6 | 2.673bc | 0.045ab | 1.477ab | 174.667bc | 1.815ab |
P1×D9 | 2.323c | 0.042b | 1.423b | 164.333c | 1.633b |
P2×D0 | 3.193b | 0.050ab | 1.600a | 186.667abc | 1.995ab |
P2×D1 | 3.553a | 0.053a | 1.627a | 198.333ab | 2.187a |
P2×D3 | 3.467ab | 0.053a | 1.633a | 201.667a | 2.122a |
P2×D6 | 3.197b | 0.049ab | 1.573ab | 183.000bc | 2.034ab |
P2×D9 | 2.680c | 0.045b | 1.497b | 172.333c | 1.797b |
P3×D0 | 3.170ab | 0.050a | 1.590a | 182.667ab | 1.997ab |
P3×D1 | 3.417a | 0.052a | 1.603a | 192.667a | 2.137a |
P3×D3 | 3.270a | 0.051a | 1.587a | 192.000a | 2.063a |
P3×D6 | 2.903b | 0.048ab | 1.547ab | 171.667b | 1.878ab |
P3×D9 | 2.490c | 0.044b | 1.463b | 168.000b | 1.704b |
P4×D0 | 3.187a | 0.049a | 1.583a | 187.333a | 2.014a |
P4×D1 | 3.210a | 0.049a | 1.550ab | 185.667a | 2.070a |
P4×D3 | 3.027ab | 0.047ab | 1.537ab | 174.667a | 1.973a |
P4×D6 | 2.707bc | 0.044bc | 1.473ab | 168.000a | 1.836ab |
P4×D9 | 2.353c | 0.041c | 1.433b | 166.667a | 1.651b |
P5×D0 | 3.153a | 0.051a | 1.580a | 183.667a | 2.000a |
P5×D1 | 2.750b | 0.046b | 1.487ab | 168.333ab | 1.853ab |
P5×D3 | 2.540bc | 0.042bc | 1.433b | 163.000bc | 1.773abc |
P5×D6 | 2.233cd | 0.040c | 1.407b | 151.667bc | 1.590bc |
P5×D9 | 2.068d | 0.039c | 1.401b | 146.333c | 1.516c |
Table 4 Effects of exogenous Pro on photosynthetic characteristics of R. soongorica
项目 Item | 净光合速率 Net photosynthetic rate (Pn, μmol·m-2·s-1) | 气孔导度 Stomatal conductance (Gs, mol·m-2·s-1) | 蒸腾速率 Transpiration rate (Tr, mmol·m-2·s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci, μmol·mol-1) | 水分利用效率 Water use efficiency (WUE, μmol CO2·mol-1 H2O) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年份Year | * | ** | ** | ** | ** |
Y1 | 2.829b | 0.042b | 1.437b | 168.314b | 1.816b |
Y2 | 3.011a | 0.052a | 1.618a | 186.466a | 1.997a |
D | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
D0 | 3.173a | 0.050a | 1.588a | 184.867a | 2.000a |
D1 | 3.233a | 0.050a | 1.567a | 187.333a | 2.062a |
D3 | 3.068a | 0.048ab | 1.545ab | 181.867a | 1.982a |
D6 | 2.743b | 0.045b | 1.495b | 169.800b | 1.831b |
D9 | 2.383c | 0.042c | 1.443c | 163.533b | 1.660c |
P | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
P1 | 2.885b | 0.046bc | 1.518bc | 178.533ab | 1.896a |
P2 | 3.218a | 0.050a | 1.586a | 188.400a | 2.027a |
P3 | 3.050ab | 0.049ab | 1.558ab | 181.400ab | 1.956a |
P4 | 2.897b | 0.046c | 1.515bc | 176.467b | 1.909a |
P5 | 2.549c | 0.044c | 1.462c | 162.600c | 1.746b |
P×D | |||||
P1×D0 | 3.160a | 0.049a | 1.587a | 184.000ab | 1.994a |
P1×D1 | 3.233a | 0.049a | 1.567a | 191.667a | 2.061a |
P1×D3 | 3.037ab | 0.046ab | 1.537ab | 178.000abc | 1.976a |
P1×D6 | 2.673bc | 0.045ab | 1.477ab | 174.667bc | 1.815ab |
P1×D9 | 2.323c | 0.042b | 1.423b | 164.333c | 1.633b |
P2×D0 | 3.193b | 0.050ab | 1.600a | 186.667abc | 1.995ab |
P2×D1 | 3.553a | 0.053a | 1.627a | 198.333ab | 2.187a |
P2×D3 | 3.467ab | 0.053a | 1.633a | 201.667a | 2.122a |
P2×D6 | 3.197b | 0.049ab | 1.573ab | 183.000bc | 2.034ab |
P2×D9 | 2.680c | 0.045b | 1.497b | 172.333c | 1.797b |
P3×D0 | 3.170ab | 0.050a | 1.590a | 182.667ab | 1.997ab |
P3×D1 | 3.417a | 0.052a | 1.603a | 192.667a | 2.137a |
P3×D3 | 3.270a | 0.051a | 1.587a | 192.000a | 2.063a |
P3×D6 | 2.903b | 0.048ab | 1.547ab | 171.667b | 1.878ab |
P3×D9 | 2.490c | 0.044b | 1.463b | 168.000b | 1.704b |
P4×D0 | 3.187a | 0.049a | 1.583a | 187.333a | 2.014a |
P4×D1 | 3.210a | 0.049a | 1.550ab | 185.667a | 2.070a |
P4×D3 | 3.027ab | 0.047ab | 1.537ab | 174.667a | 1.973a |
P4×D6 | 2.707bc | 0.044bc | 1.473ab | 168.000a | 1.836ab |
P4×D9 | 2.353c | 0.041c | 1.433b | 166.667a | 1.651b |
P5×D0 | 3.153a | 0.051a | 1.580a | 183.667a | 2.000a |
P5×D1 | 2.750b | 0.046b | 1.487ab | 168.333ab | 1.853ab |
P5×D3 | 2.540bc | 0.042bc | 1.433b | 163.000bc | 1.773abc |
P5×D6 | 2.233cd | 0.040c | 1.407b | 151.667bc | 1.590bc |
P5×D9 | 2.068d | 0.039c | 1.401b | 146.333c | 1.516c |
1 | Wang X Y. Functional research of abiotic stress-related LEA proteins WZY1-2 and WRAB18 in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Xianyang: Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, 2017. |
王晓宇. 小麦非生物胁迫相关LEA蛋白WZY1-2与WRAB18的功能研究. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2017. | |
2 | Qiao Q, Qin X S, Xing F W, et al. Death causes and conservation strategies of the annual regenerated seeding of rare plant, Bretschneidera sinensis. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(16): 4709-4716. |
乔琦, 秦新生, 邢福武, 等. 珍稀植物伯乐树一年生更新幼苗的死亡原因和保育策略. 生态学报, 2011, 31(16): 4709-4716. | |
3 | Pan R C. Plant physiology. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2012. |
潘瑞炽. 植物生理学. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2012. | |
4 | Kyeong S Y, Ram B S, Su J J, et al. Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, phytochemical contents, and antioxidant activities in lettuce seedlings. Horticulturae, 2021, 7(8): 238. |
5 | Allah W, Tanveer A, Ahmad Y T, et al. Mitigating drought stress in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) through exogenous application of β-aminobutyric acid. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2021, 21(2): 936-948. |
6 | Babaei K, Moghaddam M, Farhadi N, et al. Morphological, physiological and phytochemical responses of Mexican marigold (Tagetes minuta L.) to drought stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 2021, 284: 110116. |
7 | Zhang Y Y, Wang J X, Ma X, et al. Effect of rewatering on chlorophyll content of Platycladus orientalis seedlings after drought. Journal of Southwest Forestry University (Natural Science), 2021, 41(5): 10-17. |
张玉玉, 王进鑫, 马戌, 等. 干旱后复水对侧柏幼苗叶绿素含量的影响.西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2021, 41(5): 10-17. | |
8 | Niari N K, Najaphy A. Physiological and biochemical responses of durum wheat under mild terminal drought stress. Cellular and Molecular Biology, 2018, 64(4): 59-63. |
9 | Zhou W W, Wang Y, Du J. Influences of drought stress on the physical characteristics of Sedums species. Forest Research, 2009, 22(6): 829-834. |
周伟伟, 王雁, 杜静. 干旱胁迫对景天属植物生理生化特性的影响. 林业科学研究, 2009, 22(6): 829-834. | |
10 | Li X R, Zhao Y, Hui R, et al. Review on the research progress and trend of restoration ecology in arid areas of China. Progress in Geography, 2014, 33(11): 1435-1443. |
李新荣, 赵洋, 回嵘, 等. 中国干旱区恢复生态学研究进展及趋势评述. 地理科学进展, 2014, 33(11): 1435-1443. | |
11 | Abida P, Muhammad A A, Iqbal H, et al. Promotion of growth and physiological characteristics in water-stressed Triticum aestivum in relation to foliar-application of salicylic acid. Water, 2021, 13(9): 1316. |
12 | Allah W, Affan M, Ahmad Y T, et al. Foliar potassium sulfate application improved photosynthetic characteristics, water relations and seedling growth of drought-stressed maize. Atmosphere, 2021, 12(6): 663. |
13 | Amir G S, Afsaneh M, Ali N, et al. Application of brown algae (Sargassum angustifolium) extract for improvement of drought tolerance in canola (Brassica napus L.). Iranian Journal of Biotechnology, 2021, 19(1): 22-29. |
14 | Habib N, Qasim A, Ali S, et al. Use of nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide for better yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under water deficit conditions: growth, osmoregulation, and antioxidative defense mechanism. Plants, 2020, 9(2): 285. |
15 | Zheng J L, Zhao L Y, Wu C W, et al. Exogenous proline reduces NaCl-induced damage by mediating ionic and osmotic adjustment and enhancing antioxidant defense in Eurya emarginata. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37(9): 181. |
16 | Khampheng B, Shen L, Zhong S, et al. Improving the antioxidant system and its stress resistance to tobacco seeds and seeding by proline priming. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(1): 39-48. |
Khampheng B, 沈镭, 钟帅, 等. 脯氨酸引发提高烟草种子和幼苗抗逆性及其与抗氧化系统的关系. 山西农业科学, 2019, 47(1): 39-48. | |
17 | Sha H J. Effect of exogenous proline on the salt-tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2013. |
沙汉景. 外源脯氨酸对盐胁迫下水稻耐盐性的影响. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2013. | |
18 | Zhang Y X, Li X K. Effects of Cd, Pb and their combined pollution on physiological indexes in leaf of the Hordeum vulgare seedling. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2008, 28(1): 43-46, 53. |
张义贤, 李晓科. 镉、铅及其复合污染对大麦幼苗部分生理指标的影响. 植物研究, 2008, 28(1): 43-46, 53. | |
19 | Liang T B, Zhang J L, Tian L, et al. Effects of exogenous glycine betaine and proline on antioxidant metabolism of flue-cured tobacco under drought stress. Tobacco Science and Technology, 2013(2): 68-71. |
梁太波, 张景玲, 田雷, 等. 干旱胁迫下外源甜菜碱和脯氨酸对烤烟抗氧化代谢的影响. 烟草科技, 2013(2): 68-71. | |
20 | Ma W G, Cui H W, Li Y P, et al. Effects of seed priming with different agents on seed germination and seedling growth in tobacco (Nicotiana tobacum L.) under drought stress. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2012, 24(6): 949-956. |
马文广, 崔华威, 李永平, 等. 不同药剂引发处理对干旱胁迫下烟草种子发芽和幼苗生长的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2012, 24(6): 949-956. | |
21 | Su B B, Liu J, Li L L, et al. Effects of exogenous proline on antioxidant enzyme activity and photosynthetic characteristics of Pinellia ternate under high temperature stress. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 37(12): 34-39. |
苏贝贝, 刘佳, 李琳琳, 等. 外源脯氨酸对高温胁迫下半夏抗氧化酶活性及光合特性的影响. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(12): 34-39. | |
22 | Ali N, Ghader H, Atousa V. Exogenous proline enhances salt tolerance in acclimated Aloe vera by modulating photosystem Ⅱ efficiency and antioxidant defense. South African Journal of Botany, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2020.06.005. |
23 | Jia H J, Li Y, Yang C H, et al. Study on main water parameters and drought resistance of Reaumuria soongorica seedlings from six provenances. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2016, 30(8): 182-187. |
贾海娟, 李毅, 杨彩红, 等. 6个种源红砂幼苗主要水分参数与抗旱性研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2016, 30(8): 182-187. | |
24 | Liu Y B. Study on ecophysiological characteristics of desiccation-tolerant mechanism in desert resurrection plant Reaumuria soongorica. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2006. |
刘玉冰. 荒漠复苏植物红砂抗旱机理的生理生态学特性研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2006. | |
25 | Pan J, Li R, Hu X W. Effect of water conditions on carbon isotope composition photosynthesis and branch growth of Reaumuria soongorica. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2016, 36(6): 1190-1198. |
潘佳, 李荣, 胡小文. 水分条件对红砂叶片碳同位素组成与光合特性和分枝生长的影响. 西北植物学报, 2016, 36(6): 1190-1198. | |
26 | Chai W M, Li Y, Su S P, et al. Physiological characteristics of drought-resistant families of Nitraria tangutorum. Journal of Desert Research, 2017, 37(6): 1158-1170. |
柴文敏, 李毅, 苏世平, 等. 唐古特白刺(Nitraria tangutorum)抗旱优良家系的生理特性. 中国沙漠, 2017, 37(6): 1158-1170. | |
27 | Li H S. Principle and technology of plant physiological and biochemical experiments. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2001: 134-170. |
李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001: 134-170. | |
28 | Gao J F. Guidance of plant physiology experiments. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006. |
高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006. | |
29 | Taia A, Wael M S. Effect of deficit irrigation and growing seasons on plant water status, fruit yield and water use efficiency of squash under saline soil. Scientia Horticulturae, 2015, 186: 89-100. |
30 | Semida W M, Abdelkhalik A, Rady M O A, et al. Exogenously applied proline enhances growth and productivity of drought stressed onion by improving photosynthetic efficiency, water use efficiency and up-regulating osmoprotectants. Scientia Horticulturae, 2020, 272: 109580. |
31 | Tang Z C. Accumulation of proline in plants under adversity and its possible significance. Plant Physiology Communication, 1984(1): 15-21. |
汤章城. 逆境条件下植物脯氨酸的累积及其可能的意义. 植物生理学通讯, 1984(1): 15-21. | |
32 | Wang W, Wu C W, Wang X, et al. Effects of exogenous proline on growth, antioxidant enzyme activity and osmotic adjustment substance accumulation in radish seedlings under salt stress. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2019, 31(3): 51-56. |
王玮, 吴传万, 王欣, 等. 外源脯氨酸对盐胁迫下萝卜幼苗生长、抗氧化酶活性及渗透调节物质积累的影响. 江西农业学报, 2019, 31(3): 51-56. | |
33 | Sha H J, Liu H L, Wang J G, et al. Effect of exogenous proline on growth of salt-stressed rice at tillering stage. Research of Agricultural Modernization, 2013, 34(2): 230-234. |
沙汉景, 刘化龙, 王敬国, 等. 外源脯氨酸对盐胁迫下水稻分蘖期生长的影响.农业现代化研究, 2013, 34(2): 230-234. | |
34 | Dong B, Lan L J, Huang Y F, et al. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic pigments and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics in leaves of Camellia oleifera. Non-wood Forest Research, 2020, 38(3): 16-25. |
董斌, 蓝来娇, 黄永芳, 等. 干旱胁迫对油茶叶片叶绿素含量和叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 经济林研究, 2020, 38(3): 16-25. | |
35 | Luo Z Q, Wang H, Chen M, et al. Effects of drought stress on physiological and biochemical characteristics of four Camellia oleifera varieties seedlings. Non-wood Forest Research, 2019, 37(2): 104-113. |
罗梓琼, 王慧, 陈铭, 等. 干旱胁迫对4个油茶品种苗木生理生化指标的影响. 经济林研究, 2019, 37(2): 104-113. | |
36 | Wang P R, Zhang F T, Gao J X, et al. An overview of chlorophyll biosynthesis in higher plants. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia, 2009, 29(3): 629-636. |
王平荣, 张帆涛, 高家旭, 等. 高等植物叶绿素生物合成的研究进展. 西北植物学报, 2009, 29(3): 629-636. | |
37 | Farquhar G D, Sharkey T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology, 1982, 33(1): 317-345. |
38 | Yang B X, Gong T, Ma Y F, et al. Effects of salicvlic acid on the growth and photosynthesis characters of purple majesty (Pennisetum glaucum) during temperature stress. Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2012, 37(2): 66-71. |
杨丙贤, 龚婷, 马永甫, 等. 水杨酸对温度胁迫下紫御谷幼苗生长及光合特性的影响. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 37(2): 66-71. | |
39 | Yan Z M, Sun J, Guo S R. Effects of exogenous proline on seedling growth, photosynthesis and photosynthetic fluorescence characteristics in leaves of melon under salt stress. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 29(5): 1125-1130. |
颜志明, 孙锦, 郭世荣. 外源脯氨酸对盐胁迫下甜瓜幼苗生长、光合作用和光合荧光参数的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2013, 29(5): 1125-1130. |
[1] | Yi-ting JIN, Wen-hui LIU, Kai-qiang LIU, Guo-ling LIANG, Zhi-feng JIA. Effect of water deficit stress on the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No.1’ over the whole crop growth period [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6): 112-126. |
[2] | Jia-yu JIANG, Xue LIAN, Xi-ming TANG, Ren-tao LIU, An-ning ZHANG. The arthropod community structure in Reaumuria soongorica litter at the early stage of its decomposition in arid and semi-arid regions [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(5): 156-168. |
[3] | Zhi-heng WANG, Yu-qing WEI, Yan-rong ZHAO, Yue-juan WANG. A transcriptomic study of physiological responses to drought and salt stress in sweet sorghum seedlings [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 71-84. |
[4] | Peng-fei GAO, Jing ZHANG, Wei-fang FAN, Bing GAO, Hong-juan HAO, Jian-hui WU. Effects of drought stress on root characteristics structure and physiological characteristics of Potentilla bifurca var. glabrata [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(2): 203-212. |
[5] | Na WEI, Yan-peng LI, Yi-tong MA, Wen-xian LIU. Genome-wide identification of the alfalfa TCP gene family and analysis of gene transcription patterns in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(1): 118-130. |
[6] | Zhen-feng ZANG, Jie BAI, Cong LIU, Kan-zhuo ZAN, Ming-xiu LONG, Shu-bin HE. Variety specificity of alfalfa morphological and physiological characteristics in response to drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 73-81. |
[7] | Qiao-yu LUO, Yan-long WANG, Zhi CHEN, Yong-gui MA, Qi-mei REN, Yu-shou MA. Effect of water stress on proline accumulation and metabolic pathways in Deschampsia caespitosa [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 75-83. |
[8] | An-qiao LU, Feng-ju ZHANG, Xing XU, Xue-qin WANG, Shan YAO. Effects of salt stress on growth and physiological characteristics of Echinochloa frumentacea seedlings [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 84-93. |
[9] | Yi-yao HOU, Xiao LI, Rui-cai LONG, Qing-chuan YANG, Jun-mei KANG, Chang-hong GUO. Effect of overexpression of the alfalfa MsHB7 gene on drought tolerance of Arabidopsis [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 170-179. |
[10] | Ya-qi CHEN, Kai-qi SU, Tai-xiang CHEN, Chun-jie LI. Effects of complex saline-alkali stress on seed germination and seedling physiological characteristics of Achnatherum inebrians [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 137-157. |
[11] | Kai-qiang LIU, Wen-hui LIU, Zhi-feng JIA, Guo-ling LIANG, Xiang MA. Effects of drought stress on yield and dry matter accumulation and distribution of Avena sativa cv. Qingyan No.1 [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 177-188. |
[12] | Dong LI, Hong-tao SHEN, Yan-fang WANG, Yue-hua WANG, Li-jun WANG, Shi-min ZHAO, Ling LIU. Effects of exogenous melatonin on photosynthetic carbon assimilation and endogenous hormones in tobacco seedlings under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 130-139. |
[13] | SUN Xiao-fu, HUANG Li-juan, WANG Pu-chang, ZHAO Li-li, LIU Fang. Effects of different phosphorus supply levels on morphology and physiology of Paspalum wettsteinii [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 58-69. |
[14] | ZENG Ling-shuang, LI Pei-ying, SUN Xiao-fan, SUN Zong-jiu. A multi-trait evaluation of drought resistance of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) germplasm from different habitats in Xinjiang province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 155-169. |
[15] | ZHANG Yu-jun, SHANG Yi-shun, WANG Pu-chang, DING Lei-lei, ZHANG Wen, ZOU Chao. Effects of super absorbent polymers on growth and physiological characteristics of Sophora davidii vs. Panjiang seedlings under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 90-98. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||