Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (8): 152-163.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2022365
Wen-wei LIU1(), Xin LIU1, Ying-xia LEI1, Qing-ping ZHOU1, Zhi-feng LIU2, Pei WANG1()
Received:
2022-09-08
Revised:
2022-11-14
Online:
2023-08-20
Published:
2023-06-16
Contact:
Pei WANG
Wen-wei LIU, Xin LIU, Ying-xia LEI, Qing-ping ZHOU, Zhi-feng LIU, Pei WANG. A comprehensive evaluation of cold resistance and the physiological response of Elymus sibiricus genotypes[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(8): 152-163.
Table 1 The origin of 43 accessions of E. sibiricus germplasms
编号 Code | 隶属函数值Subordinate function value | 综合评价值 C value | 排序 Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
最大光化学效率Fv/Fm | 相对电导率Relative electric conductivity | 叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content | |||
0.4687 | 0.2178 | 0.1289 | 0.8154 | 1 | |
0.4213 | 0.2488 | 0.1028 | 0.7729 | 2 | |
0.3842 | 0.2648 | 0.0994 | 0.7483 | 3 | |
0.4064 | 0.2552 | 0.0612 | 0.7228 | 4 | |
0.4506 | 0.2174 | 0.0529 | 0.7209 | 5 | |
0.4604 | 0.0992 | 0.0883 | 0.6479 | 6 | |
0.3456 | 0.2241 | 0.0776 | 0.6473 | 7 | |
0.3152 | 0.2971 | 0.0234 | 0.6357 | 8 | |
0.3211 | 0.2946 | 0.0197 | 0.6354 | 9 | |
0.3616 | 0.2132 | 0.0585 | 0.6333 | 10 | |
0.3773 | 0.2474 | 0.0000 | 0.6247 | 11 | |
0.4029 | 0.1947 | 0.0192 | 0.6168 | 12 | |
0.3427 | 0.2535 | 0.0111 | 0.6072 | 13 | |
0.2171 | 0.3296 | 0.0557 | 0.6023 | 14 | |
0.1771 | 0.3384 | 0.0839 | 0.5994 | 15 | |
0.1395 | 0.3592 | 0.1006 | 0.5992 | 16 | |
0.3294 | 0.2489 | 0.0205 | 0.5989 | 17 | |
0.2833 | 0.2100 | 0.0961 | 0.5893 | 18 | |
0.3101 | 0.1251 | 0.1514 | 0.5866 | 19 | |
0.4557 | 0.0459 | 0.0690 | 0.5707 | 20 | |
0.2536 | 0.2785 | 0.0352 | 0.5673 | 21 | |
0.1988 | 0.2385 | 0.1138 | 0.5511 | 22 | |
0.2108 | 0.2754 | 0.0587 | 0.5449 | 23 | |
0.1608 | 0.3274 | 0.0479 | 0.5361 | 24 | |
0.0775 | 0.3268 | 0.1091 | 0.5134 | 25 | |
0.1429 | 0.2436 | 0.1123 | 0.4987 | 26 | |
0.0502 | 0.3257 | 0.1156 | 0.4915 | 27 | |
0.0968 | 0.3169 | 0.0654 | 0.4791 | 28 | |
0.1813 | 0.1634 | 0.1320 | 0.4768 | 29 | |
0.0949 | 0.3232 | 0.0510 | 0.4692 | 30 | |
0.0684 | 0.2816 | 0.0949 | 0.4450 | 31 | |
0.0370 | 0.2349 | 0.1393 | 0.4112 | 32 | |
0.0462 | 0.2217 | 0.1401 | 0.4079 | 33 | |
0.0860 | 0.1338 | 0.1721 | 0.3919 | 34 | |
0.2368 | 0.0999 | 0.0531 | 0.3898 | 35 | |
0.1063 | 0.2072 | 0.0281 | 0.3417 | 36 | |
0.0828 | 0.1647 | 0.0709 | 0.3184 | 37 | |
0.0042 | 0.1434 | 0.1622 | 0.3099 | 38 | |
0.1261 | 0.0404 | 0.1279 | 0.2944 | 39 | |
0.1568 | 0.0000 | 0.1107 | 0.2675 | 40 | |
0.0000 | 0.1533 | 0.1005 | 0.2538 | 41 | |
0.1208 | 0.0893 | 0.0029 | 0.2130 | 42 | |
0.0593 | 0.0206 | 0.0715 | 0.1514 | 43 |
Table 2 Evaluation of cold resistance among 43 tested E. sibiricus by the membership function
编号 Code | 隶属函数值Subordinate function value | 综合评价值 C value | 排序 Rank | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
最大光化学效率Fv/Fm | 相对电导率Relative electric conductivity | 叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content | |||
0.4687 | 0.2178 | 0.1289 | 0.8154 | 1 | |
0.4213 | 0.2488 | 0.1028 | 0.7729 | 2 | |
0.3842 | 0.2648 | 0.0994 | 0.7483 | 3 | |
0.4064 | 0.2552 | 0.0612 | 0.7228 | 4 | |
0.4506 | 0.2174 | 0.0529 | 0.7209 | 5 | |
0.4604 | 0.0992 | 0.0883 | 0.6479 | 6 | |
0.3456 | 0.2241 | 0.0776 | 0.6473 | 7 | |
0.3152 | 0.2971 | 0.0234 | 0.6357 | 8 | |
0.3211 | 0.2946 | 0.0197 | 0.6354 | 9 | |
0.3616 | 0.2132 | 0.0585 | 0.6333 | 10 | |
0.3773 | 0.2474 | 0.0000 | 0.6247 | 11 | |
0.4029 | 0.1947 | 0.0192 | 0.6168 | 12 | |
0.3427 | 0.2535 | 0.0111 | 0.6072 | 13 | |
0.2171 | 0.3296 | 0.0557 | 0.6023 | 14 | |
0.1771 | 0.3384 | 0.0839 | 0.5994 | 15 | |
0.1395 | 0.3592 | 0.1006 | 0.5992 | 16 | |
0.3294 | 0.2489 | 0.0205 | 0.5989 | 17 | |
0.2833 | 0.2100 | 0.0961 | 0.5893 | 18 | |
0.3101 | 0.1251 | 0.1514 | 0.5866 | 19 | |
0.4557 | 0.0459 | 0.0690 | 0.5707 | 20 | |
0.2536 | 0.2785 | 0.0352 | 0.5673 | 21 | |
0.1988 | 0.2385 | 0.1138 | 0.5511 | 22 | |
0.2108 | 0.2754 | 0.0587 | 0.5449 | 23 | |
0.1608 | 0.3274 | 0.0479 | 0.5361 | 24 | |
0.0775 | 0.3268 | 0.1091 | 0.5134 | 25 | |
0.1429 | 0.2436 | 0.1123 | 0.4987 | 26 | |
0.0502 | 0.3257 | 0.1156 | 0.4915 | 27 | |
0.0968 | 0.3169 | 0.0654 | 0.4791 | 28 | |
0.1813 | 0.1634 | 0.1320 | 0.4768 | 29 | |
0.0949 | 0.3232 | 0.0510 | 0.4692 | 30 | |
0.0684 | 0.2816 | 0.0949 | 0.4450 | 31 | |
0.0370 | 0.2349 | 0.1393 | 0.4112 | 32 | |
0.0462 | 0.2217 | 0.1401 | 0.4079 | 33 | |
0.0860 | 0.1338 | 0.1721 | 0.3919 | 34 | |
0.2368 | 0.0999 | 0.0531 | 0.3898 | 35 | |
0.1063 | 0.2072 | 0.0281 | 0.3417 | 36 | |
0.0828 | 0.1647 | 0.0709 | 0.3184 | 37 | |
0.0042 | 0.1434 | 0.1622 | 0.3099 | 38 | |
0.1261 | 0.0404 | 0.1279 | 0.2944 | 39 | |
0.1568 | 0.0000 | 0.1107 | 0.2675 | 40 | |
0.0000 | 0.1533 | 0.1005 | 0.2538 | 41 | |
0.1208 | 0.0893 | 0.0029 | 0.2130 | 42 | |
0.0593 | 0.0206 | 0.0715 | 0.1514 | 43 |
指标 Index | 主成分 Principal component | |
---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | |
初始荧光Fo | -0.887 | 0.282 |
最大光化学效率Fv/Fm | 0.872 | -0.410 |
实际光化学效率Y(Ⅱ) | 0.938 | -0.232 |
光化学淬灭系数qP | 0.884 | -0.218 |
非光化学淬灭系数qN | 0.949 | -0.293 |
叶绿素Chlorophyll | 0.917 | -0.067 |
相对含水量Relative water content | -0.049 | -0.095 |
相对电导率Relative electric conductivity | -0.973 | -0.067 |
丙二醛Malondialdehyde | -0.874 | 0.051 |
可溶性糖Soluble sugar | -0.264 | 0.834 |
游离脯氨酸Proline | -0.022 | 0.988 |
过氧化氢H2O2 | -0.620 | 0.600 |
超氧阴离子O2·– | -0.761 | 0.627 |
过氧化氢酶Catalase | 0.916 | -0.361 |
特征值 Eigen value | 9.926 | 5.125 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 69.744 | 16.063 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 69.744 | 85.807 |
Table 3 Principal component analysis
指标 Index | 主成分 Principal component | |
---|---|---|
Ⅰ | Ⅱ | |
初始荧光Fo | -0.887 | 0.282 |
最大光化学效率Fv/Fm | 0.872 | -0.410 |
实际光化学效率Y(Ⅱ) | 0.938 | -0.232 |
光化学淬灭系数qP | 0.884 | -0.218 |
非光化学淬灭系数qN | 0.949 | -0.293 |
叶绿素Chlorophyll | 0.917 | -0.067 |
相对含水量Relative water content | -0.049 | -0.095 |
相对电导率Relative electric conductivity | -0.973 | -0.067 |
丙二醛Malondialdehyde | -0.874 | 0.051 |
可溶性糖Soluble sugar | -0.264 | 0.834 |
游离脯氨酸Proline | -0.022 | 0.988 |
过氧化氢H2O2 | -0.620 | 0.600 |
超氧阴离子O2·– | -0.761 | 0.627 |
过氧化氢酶Catalase | 0.916 | -0.361 |
特征值 Eigen value | 9.926 | 5.125 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 69.744 | 16.063 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 69.744 | 85.807 |
1 | Ren Y J, Guo Y T, Zhao M L. Research progress of response to low temperature stress in plant. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2020, 18(14): 4775-4781. |
任延靖, 郭怡婷, 赵孟良. 植物应答低温胁迫的研究进展. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(14): 4775-4781. | |
2 | Guo X, Liu D, Chong K. Cold signaling in plants: Insights into mechanisms and regulation. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2018, 60(9): 745-756. |
3 | Zhou Q Y, Han Y H, Pan J J, et al. Research progress in plant cold resistance mechanism. Journal of Xinyang Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 32(3): 511-516. |
周棋赢, 韩月华, 潘娟娟, 等. 植物抗寒机理研究进展. 信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2019, 32(3): 511-516. | |
4 | Li X R, Chen S X, Yan J J, et al. Research progress on Elymus sibiricus germplasm resources. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2021(1): 6-17. |
李欣瑞, 陈淑娴, 鄢家俊, 等. 老芒麦种质资源研究进展. 草学, 2021(1): 6-17. | |
5 | Yan J J, Bai S Q, Zhang X Q, et al. Genetic diversity of wild Elymus sibiricus germplasm from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau in China detected by SRAP markers. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(1): 173-183. |
鄢家俊, 白史且, 张新全, 等. 青藏高原老芒麦种质基于SRAP标记的遗传多样性研究. 草业学报, 2010, 19(1): 173-183. | |
6 | De Y, Zhao L X, Mu H B. Winter hardiness of 30 germplasm materials of Elymus sibiricus. Pratacultural Science, 2011, 28(1): 90-93. |
德英, 赵来喜, 穆怀彬. 30份老芒麦种质材料抗寒性研究. 草业科学, 2011, 28(1): 90-93. | |
7 | Fu J J, Liu J, Sun Y F, et al. Effects of cold stress on the growths and physiological characteristics of two Elymus nutans varieties. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(4): 789-795. |
付娟娟, 刘建, 孙永芳, 等. 冷胁迫对2种垂穗披碱草生长和生理特性的影响. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4): 789-795. | |
8 | Wang S G. Plant physiology and biochemistry. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007: 332-334. |
王三根. 植物生理生化. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007: 332-334. | |
9 | Gao J F. Experimental guidance in plant physiology. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2006: 228-231. |
高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006: 228-231. | |
10 | Jia X, Duoji G S, Zhao A M, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of cold resistance of 4 species of Gramineae at seedling stage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1372-1378. |
贾祥, 多吉格桑, 赵爱民, 等. 4种禾本科牧草苗期抗寒性综合评价. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1372-1378. | |
11 | Wang P, Chen J H, Wang P, et al. Status of research into the abiotic stress tolerance of Elymus species. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(5): 151-162. |
王沛, 陈玖红, 王平, 等. 披碱草属植物抗逆性研究现状和存在的问题. 草业学报, 2019, 28(5): 151-162. | |
12 | Ma Y Z, Ke S Y. Cold resistance and related physiological indexes identification of Bupleurum seedlings during wintering stage. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2014, 34(4): 786-791. |
马艳芝, 客绍英. 柴胡幼苗越冬抗寒性及其相关生理指标筛选. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(4): 786-791. | |
13 | Fracheboud Y, Haldimann P, Leipner J, et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a selection tool for cold tolerance of photosynthesis in maize (Zea mays L.). Journal of Experimental Botany, 1999, 50(338): 1533-1540. |
14 | Na Y W, Jeong H, Lee S Y, et al. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a diagnostic tool for abiotic stress tolerance in wild and cultivated strawberry species. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology, 2014, 55(4): 280-286. |
15 | Zhai F F, Han L, Liu J X, et al. Assessing cold resistance of mutagenic strains of perennial ryegrass under artificial low- temperature stress. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(6): 268-279. |
翟飞飞, 韩蕾, 刘俊祥, 等. 人工低温胁迫下多年生黑麦草诱变株系的抗寒性研究. 草业学报, 2013, 22(6): 268-279. | |
16 | He Z H, Yang C H, Wang P, et al. Effect of low-temperature stress on the physiological responses of six gramineous forages in alpine regions and evaluation of their cold resistance. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(10): 2019-2028. |
何子华, 杨成行, 王沛, 等. 高寒地区6种禾本科牧草对低温胁迫的生理响应及耐寒性评价. 草业科学, 2021, 38(10): 2019-2028. | |
17 | Wise R R, Naylor A W. Chilling-enhanced photooxidation. Plant Physiology, 1987, 83(2): 278-282. |
18 | Pubu Z M, Qimei L M, Li D D, et al. Effects of exogenous proline on growth and antioxidant enzyme related gene expression of Elymus nutans under low temperature stress. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(3): 589-596. |
普布卓玛, 其美拉姆, 李丹丹. 等. 外源脯氨酸对低温胁迫下西藏野生垂穗披碱草幼苗生长和抗氧化酶相关基因表达的影响. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 589-596. | |
19 | Hare P D, Cress W A, Staden J V. Dissecting the roles of osmolyte accumulation during stress. Plant, Cell and Environment, 1998, 21(6): 535-553. |
20 | Wang Y F, Zhao S L, Wang H, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on cold resistance of different walnut germplasms at leaf-expansion period. Non-wood Forest Research, 2019, 37(1): 50-60. |
王一峰, 赵淑玲, 王瀚, 等. 不同核桃种质展叶期抗寒性的综合评价. 经济林研究, 2019, 37(1): 50-60. | |
21 | Gill S S, Tuteja N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2010, 48(12): 909-930. |
22 | Apel K, Hirt H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2004, 55(1): 373-399. |
23 | Hui Z M, Wang Z Z, Hu Y, et al. Effects of 24-Epibrassinolide on the antioxidant system and osmotic adjustment substance in grape seedlings (V.vinifera L.) under chilling stress. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013, 46(5): 1005-1013. |
惠竹梅, 王智真, 胡勇, 等. 24-表油菜素内酯对低温胁迫下葡萄幼苗抗氧化系统及渗透调节物质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(5): 1005-1013. | |
24 | Kazemi-Shahandashti S S, Maali-Amiri R, Zeinali H, et al. Effect of short-term cold stress on oxidative damage and transcript accumulation of defense-related genes in chickpea seedlings. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2014, 171(13): 1106-1116. |
25 | Huang L F, Li J Q, Wang X Y, et al. Low-temp tolerance of coffea seedlings evaluated by photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence indices. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 35(10): 1063-1070. |
黄丽芳, 李金芹, 王晓阳, 等. 基于幼苗光合及叶绿素荧光参数的3种咖啡耐低温胁迫的综合评判. 福建农业学报, 2020, 35(10): 1063-1070. | |
26 | Yue J Q, Zhang S Y, Li X D, et al. Effect of low temperature stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and yield of wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41(1): 105-110. |
岳俊芹, 张素瑜, 李向东, 等. 低温胁迫对小麦叶绿素荧光参数及产量的响应. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(1): 105-110. | |
27 | Chen Z C, Wang Z W, Wang R R, et al. Physiological response of three broadleaved tree species to drought stress and evaluation of drought resistance. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 11(2): 65-71. |
陈志成, 王志伟, 王荣荣, 等. 3种阔叶树种对持续干旱的生理响应及抗旱性评价. 中国水土保持科学, 2013, 11(2): 65-71. | |
28 | Govindjee, Papageorgiou G. Chlorophyll a fluorescence: A bit of basics and history. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004: 16-25. |
29 | Yoshihiro Y, Yasuhiro K, Hiroyuki K, et al. Increases in the fluorescence Fo level and reversible inhibition of photosystem Ⅱ reaction center by high-temperature treatments in higher plants. Photosynthesis Research, 1997, 52(1): 57-64. |
30 | Li J Q, Han Y Z, Dong Y P, et al. Effects of low temperature stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of two grafting methods of coffee. China Tropical Agriculture, 2021(1): 63-68, 104. |
李金芹, 韩永庄, 董云萍, 等. 低温胁迫对咖啡2种嫁接方式叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 中国热带农业, 2021(1): 63-68, 104. |
[1] | Shi-yang ZHANG, Feng-min LIU, Jun-tao CUI, Lei HE, Yue-yan FENG, Wei-li ZHANG. Effects of three exogenous substances on the physiological and fluorescence characteristics of Stylosanthes guianensis under low-temperature stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(6): 85-99. |
[2] | Chun-yan LI, Yan WANG, Xin-rui LI, Ying-zhu LI, Ming-feng LI, Li-li CHEN, Xiong LEI, Li-jun YAN, Ming-hong YOU, Xiao-fei JI, Chang-bing ZHANG, Qi WU, Wen-long GOU, Da-xu LI, Jia-jun YAN, Shi-qie BAI. Morphological diversity and germplasm utilization potential of wild Elymus sibiricus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 67-79. |
[3] | Yong-chao ZHANG, Xiao-xing WEI, Guo-ling LIANG, Yan QIN, Wen-hui LIU, Zhi-feng JIA, Yong LIU, Xiang MA. Phenotype changes during aging over six years of Elymus sibiricus stands and the effects of nutrient addition [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6): 101-111. |
[4] | Yi-ting JIN, Wen-hui LIU, Kai-qiang LIU, Guo-ling LIANG, Zhi-feng JIA. Effect of water deficit stress on the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No.1’ over the whole crop growth period [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6): 112-126. |
[5] | Yong-chao ZHANG, Guo-ling LIANG, Yan QIN, Wen-hui LIU, Zhi-feng JIA, Yong LIU, Xiang MA. Characteristics of chlorophyll and photosynthesis in leaves and their response to nutrients during aging of Elymus sibiricus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(1): 229-237. |
[6] | Lu-yao WU, Jian-guo ZHANG, Wen-qian CHANG, Shao-lei ZHANG, Qing CHANG. Diurnal change in chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in three desert plants [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(9): 203-213. |
[7] | Chuan-qi WANG, Wen-hui LIU, Yong-chao ZHANG, Qing-ping ZHOU. Studies on drought tolerance of wild Elymus sibiricus at the seedling stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 127-136. |
[8] | Rui WU, Wen-hui LIU, Yong-chao ZHANG, Yan QIN, Xiao-xing WEI, Min-jie LIU. A study of the correlation between seed shattering and agronomic traits of Elymus sibiricus on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 130-139. |
[9] | WANG Yu-ping, GAO Chun-xiao, WANG Sheng-xiang, HE Xiao-tong. Changes in photoinhibition and fatty acid composition in the thylakoid membrane of kidney bean leaves under low temperature and weak light stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 116-125. |
[10] | ZHANG Li-xia, CHANG Qing-shan, XUE Xian, LIU Wei, ZHANG Qiao-ming, CHEN Su-dan, ZHENG Yi-qi, LI Jing-lin, CHEN Wan-dong, LI Da-zhao. Effects of acid stress on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and root antioxidant activity of Prunella vulgaris [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 134-142. |
[11] | HE Hai-feng, YAN Cheng-hong, WU Na, LIU Ji-li, CHANG Wen-wen. Effects of nitrogen application rate on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and dry matter accumulation in switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) leaves [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(11): 141-150. |
[12] | LIU Jian-xin, OU Xiao-bin, WANG Jin-cheng, LIU Rui-rui, JIA Hai-yan. Physiological response of naked oat seedlings to exogenous hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) under cadmium stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(1): 125-134. |
[13] | LIU Ling, LI Dong, MA Yi-lin, WANG Li-jun, ZHAO Shi-min, ZHOU Jun-xue, SHEN Hong-tao, WANG Yan-fang. Alleviation of drought stress and the physiological mechanisms in tobacco seedlings treated with exogenous melatonin [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(8): 95-105. |
[14] | WU Xiao, HE Xiu-juan, WU Chao, DONG Yu-feng, ZHANG Yan, XU Yu, QIN Wei-dong, LÜ Jun, WANG San-gen, ZONG Xue-feng. Effect of shading on photosynthetic and antioxidant characteristics of Pueraria lobata [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(5): 68-78. |
[15] | ZHANG Xue-yue, ZUO Shi-yu, TIAN Li-xin, LI Li-jie, REN Xiao-song, LIU Zhao-yue, LI Jing. Effect of planting density on photosynthetic performance and yield of winter rye [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(3): 131-141. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||