Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (10): 132-150.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025030
Yi-lin HAN(
), Wen-juan KANG(
), Shang-li SHI(
), Yuan-yuan DU, Fu-qiang HE, Yan WANG, Wen-lu HOU, Xi-lin XIE
Received:2025-02-01
Revised:2025-02-20
Online:2025-10-20
Published:2025-07-11
Contact:
Wen-juan KANG,Shang-li SHI
Yi-lin HAN, Wen-juan KANG, Shang-li SHI, Yuan-yuan DU, Fu-qiang HE, Yan WANG, Wen-lu HOU, Xi-lin XIE. Studies of the difference in symbiotic interaction between Sinorhizobium meliloti strain QL2 and different alfalfa varieties[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(10): 132-150.
编号 Number | 品种名 Variety name | 学名 Scientific name | 类型 Type | 产地 Habitat | 来源 Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WL168 | WL168HQ | M. sativa ‘WL168HQ’ | 国外引进品种 Foreign introduced varieties | 美国 America | 北京正道生态科技有限公司 Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
| WL298 | WL298HQ | M. sativa ‘WL298HQ’ | |||
| WL319 | WL319HQ | M. sativa ‘WL319HQ’ | |||
| QS | 清水苜蓿Qingshui | M. sativa ‘Qingshui’ | 地方品种 The local varieties | 中国 China | 甘肃农业大学草业生态系统教育部重点实验室 Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem of Ministry of Education, Gansu Agricultural University |
| LZ | 陇中苜蓿Longzhong | M. sativa ‘Longzhong’ | |||
| G9 | 甘农9号Gannong No.9 | M. sativa ‘Gannong No.9’ | 我国育成品种 Varieties bred in China | 中国 China | 甘肃农业大学草业生态系统教育部重点实验室 Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem of Ministry of Education, Gansu Agricultural University |
| G3 | 甘农3号Gannong No.3 | M. sativa ‘Gannong No.3’ | |||
| G5 | 甘农5号Gannong No.5 | M. sativa ‘Gannong No.5’ |
Table 1 Test alfalfa varieties
编号 Number | 品种名 Variety name | 学名 Scientific name | 类型 Type | 产地 Habitat | 来源 Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WL168 | WL168HQ | M. sativa ‘WL168HQ’ | 国外引进品种 Foreign introduced varieties | 美国 America | 北京正道生态科技有限公司 Beijing Rytway Ecotechnology Co., Ltd. |
| WL298 | WL298HQ | M. sativa ‘WL298HQ’ | |||
| WL319 | WL319HQ | M. sativa ‘WL319HQ’ | |||
| QS | 清水苜蓿Qingshui | M. sativa ‘Qingshui’ | 地方品种 The local varieties | 中国 China | 甘肃农业大学草业生态系统教育部重点实验室 Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem of Ministry of Education, Gansu Agricultural University |
| LZ | 陇中苜蓿Longzhong | M. sativa ‘Longzhong’ | |||
| G9 | 甘农9号Gannong No.9 | M. sativa ‘Gannong No.9’ | 我国育成品种 Varieties bred in China | 中国 China | 甘肃农业大学草业生态系统教育部重点实验室 Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem of Ministry of Education, Gansu Agricultural University |
| G3 | 甘农3号Gannong No.3 | M. sativa ‘Gannong No.3’ | |||
| G5 | 甘农5号Gannong No.5 | M. sativa ‘Gannong No.5’ |
| 分级Grade | GI值GI value (MJ·d-1) |
|---|---|
| 特级 Extra grade | >53.68 |
| 1级 First grade | 33.50~53.68 |
| 2级 Second grade | 19.20~29.29 |
| 3级 Third grade | 11.10~16.44 |
| 4级 Fourth grade | 6.28~10.67 |
| 5级Fifth grade | <6.28 |
Table 2 Grade standard of roughage quality
| 分级Grade | GI值GI value (MJ·d-1) |
|---|---|
| 特级 Extra grade | >53.68 |
| 1级 First grade | 33.50~53.68 |
| 2级 Second grade | 19.20~29.29 |
| 3级 Third grade | 11.10~16.44 |
| 4级 Fourth grade | 6.28~10.67 |
| 5级Fifth grade | <6.28 |
类型 Type | 特点 Feature | 品种(接菌后) Varieties (after inoculation) |
|---|---|---|
| 地上积累型Above-ground accumulation type | 地上干重增加,地下干重无显著差异。Above-ground dry weight increased significantly, while under-ground dry weight showed no significant difference. | WL298 |
| 地上、地下积累型Above-ground and under-ground accumulation type | 地上、地下干重增加。The dry weight of both above-ground and under-ground exhibited an increase. | G3、WL319 |
| 地下积累型Under-ground accumulation type | 地上干重无显著差异,地下干重显著增加。There was no significant difference in above-ground dry weight, while under-ground dry weight increased significantly. | WL168 |
| 零增长型Zero-growth type | 地上、地下干重均无显著差异。The above-ground and under-ground dry weights did not exhibit any statistically significant difference. | QS |
| 地上、地下消耗型Above-ground and under-ground depletion type | 地上、地下干重减少。The above-ground and under-ground biomass demonstrated a substantial reduction. | G9 |
| 地下消耗型Under-ground depletion type | 地上干重无显著差异,地下干重减少。The above-ground biomass did not exhibit any significant difference, whereas a notable decrease was observed in the under-ground biomass. | G5、LZ |
Table 3 The change types of aboveground and underground biomass in different symbiotic combinations
类型 Type | 特点 Feature | 品种(接菌后) Varieties (after inoculation) |
|---|---|---|
| 地上积累型Above-ground accumulation type | 地上干重增加,地下干重无显著差异。Above-ground dry weight increased significantly, while under-ground dry weight showed no significant difference. | WL298 |
| 地上、地下积累型Above-ground and under-ground accumulation type | 地上、地下干重增加。The dry weight of both above-ground and under-ground exhibited an increase. | G3、WL319 |
| 地下积累型Under-ground accumulation type | 地上干重无显著差异,地下干重显著增加。There was no significant difference in above-ground dry weight, while under-ground dry weight increased significantly. | WL168 |
| 零增长型Zero-growth type | 地上、地下干重均无显著差异。The above-ground and under-ground dry weights did not exhibit any statistically significant difference. | QS |
| 地上、地下消耗型Above-ground and under-ground depletion type | 地上、地下干重减少。The above-ground and under-ground biomass demonstrated a substantial reduction. | G9 |
| 地下消耗型Under-ground depletion type | 地上干重无显著差异,地下干重减少。The above-ground biomass did not exhibit any significant difference, whereas a notable decrease was observed in the under-ground biomass. | G5、LZ |
共生组合 Symbiotic combinations | GI值 GI value (MJ·d-1) | GI级别 GI grade |
|---|---|---|
| G3-QL2 | 58.97 | 特级 Extra grade |
| G5-QL2 | 55.47 | 特级 Extra grade |
| G9-QL2 | 55.22 | 特级 Extra grade |
| WL168-QL2 | 62.12 | 特级 Extra grade |
| WL298-QL2 | 60.90 | 特级 Extra grade |
| WL319-QL2 | 56.19 | 特级 Extra grade |
| QS-QL2 | 47.10 | 1级 First grade |
| LZ-QL2 | 56.09 | 特级 Extra grade |
Table 4 GI grades of 8 symbiotic combinations
共生组合 Symbiotic combinations | GI值 GI value (MJ·d-1) | GI级别 GI grade |
|---|---|---|
| G3-QL2 | 58.97 | 特级 Extra grade |
| G5-QL2 | 55.47 | 特级 Extra grade |
| G9-QL2 | 55.22 | 特级 Extra grade |
| WL168-QL2 | 62.12 | 特级 Extra grade |
| WL298-QL2 | 60.90 | 特级 Extra grade |
| WL319-QL2 | 56.19 | 特级 Extra grade |
| QS-QL2 | 47.10 | 1级 First grade |
| LZ-QL2 | 56.09 | 特级 Extra grade |
| [1] | Liu W W. Evaluation of germplasm resources and identification of new germplasms in alfalfa. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2013. |
| 刘伟伟. 紫花苜蓿种质资源评价及新种质的鉴定. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2013. | |
| [2] | Jia X T. Study on genetic diversity and DUS test characteristics of alfalfa germplasms. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2023. |
| 贾喜涛. 苜蓿种质资源遗传多样性及DUS测试性状研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2023. | |
| [3] | Sun W B. Comprehensive evaluation of 20 alfalfa varieties in different ecological environment and comparison of nutrition characteristics among different growth stages. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2016. |
| 孙万斌. 不同生境下20个紫花苜蓿品种的综合评价及不同生育期营养特性的比较. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2016. | |
| [4] | Tormozin M A, Cherniavskih V I, Sajfutdinova L D, et al. Ecological study of alfalfa varieties of different geographical origin in the south of the central Russian upland. Russian Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 49(2): 140-145. |
| [5] | Shi S L, Nan L L, Smith K F. The current status, problems, and prospects of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) breeding in China. Agronomy, 2017, 7(1): 1. |
| [6] | Ladha J K, Peoples M B, Reddy P M. Biological nitrogen fixation and prospects for ecological intensification in cereal-based cropping systems. Field Crops Research, 2022, 283: 108541. |
| [7] | Meng J. Effects of inoculating different rhizobia on growth and seed yield of alfalfa. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021. |
| 孟捷. 接种不同根瘤菌对苜蓿生长和种子产量的影响. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2021. | |
| [8] | Gu C M, Huang W, Li Y, et al. Green manure amendment can reduce nitrogen fertilizer application rates for oilseed rape in maize-oilseed rape rotation. Plants, 2021, 10: 2640. |
| [9] | Kassaw T K. Molecular genetics of nodule number regulation: Cloning, characterization and functional studies of the root determined nodulator1 (RDN1) gene in Medicago truncatula. Clemson: South Carolina Clemson University, 2012. |
| [10] | Shi M L, Deng B, Liu Z K, et al. Inoculation effects of five rhizobial stains to alfalfa. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(1): 101-106. |
| 石茂玲, 邓波, 刘忠宽, 等. 5株根瘤菌接种紫花苜蓿的效果.草业科学, 2015, 32(1): 101-106. | |
| [11] | Nutman P S. Varietal differences in the nodulation of subterranean clover. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1967, 18(3): 381-425. |
| [12] | Chen L Y, Zhang L J, Zhou Z Y. Research of salt tolerable rhizobia inoculation effects on Medicago sativa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2008, 17(5): 43-47. |
| 陈利云, 张丽静, 周志宇. 耐盐根瘤菌对紫花苜蓿接种效果的研究. 草业学报, 2008, 17(5): 43-47. | |
| [13] | Pan J, Fan Y, Li R, et al. Screening of high efficient symbiotic rhizobium for Medicago sativa cv. Gannong No.3 and M. sativa cv. Longdong. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(8): 1536-1549. |
| 潘佳, 范燕, 李荣, 等. 甘农3号和陇东苜蓿高效共生根瘤菌菌株的筛选. 草业科学, 2016, 33(8): 1536-1549. | |
| [14] | Kang W J. Biotype classification of Medicago sativa rhizobia and its transcriptome analysis. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2019. |
| 康文娟. 紫花苜蓿根瘤菌生物型划分及其转录组学分析. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2019. | |
| [15] | Zhang S Q, Li J F, Shi S L. The relationship between developmental processes of reproductive organs and infection quantity of endogenous rhizobia. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 25(5): 997-1001. |
| 张淑卿, 李剑峰, 师尚礼. 苜蓿繁殖器官发育过程与内生根瘤菌侵染数量的关系. 江苏农业学报, 2009, 25(5): 997-1001. | |
| [16] | Zeng Z H, Sui X H, Hu Y G, et al. Screening of highly-effective Sinorhizobium meliloti strains for Medicago sativa cultivars and their field inoculation. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2004, 13(5): 95-100. |
| 曾昭海, 隋新华, 胡跃高, 等.紫花苜蓿-根瘤菌高效共生体筛选及田间作用效果. 草业学报, 2004, 13(5): 95-100. | |
| [17] | Wang L L. Molecular mechanism of leghemoglobin in controlling efficient nodule symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2019. |
| 王龙龙. 豆血红蛋白调控根瘤高效固氮的分子机制研究. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2019. | |
| [18] | Zhou N, Li W, Wu Z, et al. Sequential extractions: A new way for protein quantification-data from peanut allergens. Analytical Biochemistry, 2015, 484: 31-36. |
| [19] | Ma C, Liu C Y, Yu Y Y, et al. GmTNRP1, associated with rhizobial type-Ⅲ effector NoPT, regulates nitrogenase activity in the nodules of soybean (Glycine max). Food Energy Security, 2023, 12(4): e466. |
| [20] | Shi S L. The analysis for factors that affect the ability of growth promotion of alfalfa rhizobia in cold and drought regions and screening of high efficient strains. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2005. |
| 师尚礼. 甘肃寒旱区苜蓿根瘤菌促生能力影响因子分析及高效促生菌株筛选研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2005. | |
| [21] | Zhang L Y. Feed analyses and quality test (second edition). Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2006: 1615-1622. |
| 张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第2版). 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2006: 1615-1622. | |
| [22] | Zhang J K, Lu D X, Liu J X, et al. The present research situation and progress of crude fodder quality evaluation index. Pratacultural Science, 2004, 21(9): 55-61. |
| 张吉鹍, 卢德勋, 刘建新, 等.粗饲料品质评定指数的研究现状及其进展. 草业科学, 2004, 21(9): 55-61. | |
| [23] | Li J, Cui J J, Yu L L, et al. Research the quality on whole-plant corn silage in Jidong area. China Feed, 2021(7): 131-134. |
| 李娟, 崔婧婧, 于玲玲, 等. 冀东地区全株玉米青贮饲料品质研究. 中国饲料, 2021(7): 131-134. | |
| [24] | Li Y G, Zhou J C. Root colonization and nodulation of Sinorhizobium fredii HN01DL in Glycine max rhizosphere. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(8): 1283-1286. |
| 李友国, 周俊初. 费氏中华根瘤菌HN01DL在大豆根圈的定殖动态与结瘤研究. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(8): 1283-1286. | |
| [25] | He L. The study of symbiotic nitrogen fixation effect of alfalfa varieties and rhizobium strains. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2023. |
| 何龙. 紫花苜蓿品种-根瘤菌株共生固氮效应研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2023. | |
| [26] | Chen G. Study on lrp gene of Sinorhizobim fredii HNO1. Nanning: Guangxi University, 2007. |
| 陈钢.费氏中华根瘤菌HNO1 lrP基因的研究. 南宁: 广西大学, 2007. | |
| [27] | Kang J M, Zhang L J, Guo W S, et al. Screening of high efficient symbiotic rhizobium for Zhongmu No.1 alfalfa. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2008, 16(5): 497-500. |
| 康俊梅, 张丽娟, 郭文山, 等. 中苜1号紫花苜蓿高效共生根瘤菌的筛选. 草地学报, 2008, 16(5): 497-500. | |
| [28] | Gibson A H, Curnow B C, Bergersen F J, et al.Studies of field populations of rhizobium: Effectiveness of strains of rhizobium trifolii associated with Trifolium subterraneum L. pastures in South-Eastern Australia.Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 1975, 7: 95-102. |
| [29] | Zhan J S, Liu M M, Zhao G Q. Effects of flavonoids and their application in ruminants. China Feed, 2014(23): 13-15. |
| 占今舜, 刘明美, 赵国琦. 黄酮的作用及其在反刍动物上的应用. 中国饲料, 2014(23): 13-15. | |
| [30] | Liu Y H, Chen Y, Li H G, et al. Regulation of nitrogen application rate on nodulation,nitrogen fixation, yield, and crude protein content of different alfalfa varieties. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2024(6): 186-198. |
| 刘雨涵, 陈杨, 李海港, 等. 施氮量对不同品种苜蓿结瘤固氮和产量及粗蛋白含量的调控. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(6): 186-198. | |
| [31] | Ma X, Wang L L, Li W J, et al. Effects of different nitrogen levels on nitrogen fixation and seed production of alfalfa inoculated with rhizobia. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(1): 95-102. |
| 马霞, 王丽丽, 李卫军, 等. 不同施氮水平下接种根瘤菌对苜蓿固氮效能及种子生产的影响. 草业学报, 2013, 22(1): 95-102. | |
| [32] | Lamouche F, Bonadé-Bottino N, Mergaert P, et al. Symbiotic efficiency of spherical and elongated bacteroids in the Aeschynomene-Bradyrhizobium symbiosis. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10: 377. |
| [33] | Guo P, Wang J Y, Shi X L, et al. Effects of nitrogen application rate on nodule characteristics and nitrogen utilization in different peanut genotypes. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2022, 53(4): 385-393. |
| 郭佩, 王佳艺, 史晓龙, 等. 施氮量对不同基因型花生结瘤特性及氮素利用的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2022, 53(4): 385-393. | |
| [34] | Awodele S O, Bennett J A. Soil biota legacies of alfalfa production vary with field conditions and among varieties and species. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2022, 335: 107994. |
| [35] | Zhang F, Li Y M, Dong S K, et al. Research progress on asymbiotic nitrogen-fixing microorganisms in grassland soil. (2024-07:24)[2025-02-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1069.S.20240723.1724.004.html. |
| 张凤, 李耀明, 董世魁, 等. 草地土壤非共生固氮微生物研究进展. (2024-07:24)[2025-02-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/62.1069.S.20240723.1724.004.html. | |
| [36] | Ma X F, Gao M, Cheng Z J. Molecular regulation for uptake and utilization of nitrogen in plant. The Crop Journal, 2013(4): 32-38. |
| 马雪峰, 高旻, 程治军. 植物氮素吸收与利用的分子机制研究进展. 作物杂志, 2013(4): 32-38. | |
| [37] | Kou J T, Shi S L, Cai Z S. Effects of ridge and furrow rainfall harvesting on growth characteristics and quality of Medicago sativa in dryland. Agricultural Sciences in China, 2010, 43(24): 5028-5036. |
| 寇江涛, 师尚礼, 蔡卓山. 垄沟集雨种植对旱作紫花苜蓿生长特性及品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(24): 5028-5036. | |
| [38] | Ma Y J, Quan J P, Gan H L, et al. Assessment of the impact of rhizobial inoculation on production performance and nutritional value of different varieties of purple alfalfa. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2024, 43(1): 27-33. |
| 马垭杰, 权金鹏, 甘辉林, 等. 接种根瘤菌对不同品种紫花苜蓿生产性能及营养价值的影响评价. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2024, 43(1): 27-33. | |
| [39] | Han H W, Sun L N, Yao T, et al. Effects of bio-fertilizers with different PGPR strain combinations on yield and quality of alfalfa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(5): 104-112. |
| 韩华雯, 孙丽娜, 姚拓, 等. 不同促生菌株组合对紫花苜蓿产量和品质的影响.草业学报, 2013, 22(5): 104-112. | |
| [40] | Luo J J, Xiao Y Z, Hou M L, et al. Effects of different additives on quality and vitamin content of mixed silage of alfalfa and Leymus chinensis. (2024-11-28) [2025-02-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3362.S.20241128.0906.002.html. |
| 罗俊杰, 肖燕子, 侯美玲, 等. 不同添加剂对苜蓿与羊草混合青贮品质及维生素含量的影响. (2024-11-28) [2025-02-01]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/11.3362.S.20241128.0906.002.html. | |
| [41] | Cao K F, Liu J W, Suo R Z, et al. Effect of rhizobia inoculation on nodule nitrogen fixation and growth of ‘Mengnong Clover No.1’. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(12): 3876-3886. |
| 曹克璠, 刘嘉伟, 索荣臻, 等. 接种根瘤菌对‘蒙农三叶草1号’结瘤固氮及生长的影响. 草地学报, 2023, 31(12): 3876-3886. | |
| [42] | Wang L R, Wang W, Pu X J, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and feed quality of 19 alfalfa varieties in Qaidam Basin. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(10): 3136-3144. |
| 王龙然, 王伟, 蒲小剑, 等. 柴达木盆地19个紫花苜蓿品种生产性能和饲用品质综合评价. 草地学报, 2023, 31(10): 3136-3144. | |
| [43] | Wang X L, Li H, Mi F G, et al. Comparison of production performance and winter survival rate of different fall dormancy alfalfa varieties. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(6): 82-92. |
| 王晓龙, 李红, 米福贵, 等. 不同秋眠级苜蓿生产性能及越冬率评价. 草业学报, 2019, 28(6): 82-92. | |
| [44] | Peng Y, Ma S J, De J, et al. Comparative analysis of identification and quality of 3 (Medicago Sativa) species in Nyingchi. Journal of Plateau Agriculture, 2019, 3(1): 76-83. |
| 彭艳, 马素洁, 德吉, 等. 林芝不同紫花苜蓿(Medicago Sativa)栽培品种鉴定及品质研究. 高原农业, 2019, 3(1): 76-83. |
| [1] | Wei-peng ZOU, Yi LIU, Jia-xing ZHAI, Si-yi ZHOU, Zhi-yi GONG, Hui-fang CEN, Hui-sen ZHU, Tao XU. Cloning of MsNAC053 from alfalfa and analysis of its transcript profile in response to abiotic stresses [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(9): 121-133. |
| [2] | Ran XIAN, Yu DENG, Qiu-yue FU, Jing-xia JIANG, Jia-li TAO, Tao XU, Hui-sen ZHU, Hui-fang CEN. Cloning of alfalfa MsMYB86 and analysis of its transcriptional response to abiotic stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(9): 162-172. |
| [3] | Yi-xin LIU, Xiao-qing SUI, Xin-yao WANG, Meng-qing LANG, Ling-zi-yin SUN, Er-ge JIER. Mitigating effects of exogenous melatonin on alfalfa under salt stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(9): 206-214. |
| [4] | Ning CHEN, Feng-xuan BAO, Hui-xiang ZHAO, Nan WANG, Ru-yu JIANG, Guo-liang LI, Xiang-ping LIU, Shan-min QU, Wei-guang YANG. Physiological characteristics of the alfalfa root collar during overwintering under soda saline-alkali stress in cold areas [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(9): 78-86. |
| [5] | Hua-ying DU, Yu-zhou ZHANG, Nan ZHAO, Yan HU, Yi-dong WANG, Teng-da LIU, Pei-wen GU, Ze-yang YU. Trichoderma asperellum bai5 inhibits root rot pathogens of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and promotes alfalfa plant growth [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(8): 179-190. |
| [6] | Yi-yin ZHANG, Bin WANG, Teng-fei WANG, Jian LAN, Hai-ying HU. Effects of intercropping triticale with alfalfa on system yield, resource utilization, and alfalfa seed yield [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(8): 43-53. |
| [7] | Wen-xiu LI, Tuo YAO, Chang-ning LI, Qian-min JIA, Ao-lei HE, Yang ZHOU. Screening of the best ratio of ‘attapulgite-organic matrix’ bacterial fertilizer carrier and its growth-promotion effect on alfalfa [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(8): 88-98. |
| [8] | Xue-qian JIANG, Qing-chuan YANG, Jun-mei KANG. Research progress on yield loss under drought stress and drought resistance genetics of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(7): 219-234. |
| [9] | Xiao-Yue WEN, Ying ZHAO, Bao-qiang WANG, Xian WANG, Xiao-lin ZHU, Yi-zhen WANG, Xiao-hong WEI. Expression analysis of AP2/ERFs genes in alfalfa regulated by exogenous NO under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 154-167. |
| [10] | Ying-hao ZHANG, Chu-bo LIU, Kun ZHOU, Jia-cun GUO, Shi-peng LIU, Luan-zi SUN. Effects of jujube tree on the growth of alfalfa and orchardgrass in different positions within an orchard [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 203-212. |
| [11] | Yan-xia ZENG, Zhi-long CHEN, Ji-hong SHANG, Xiao-di SHA, Juan WU, Cai-jin CHEN. Effects of space mutagenesis on the growth of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seedlings under PEG-6000 simulated drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 59-69. |
| [12] | Kong-qin WEI, Ying-ying ZHANG, Jin-feng HUI, Chun-hui MA, Qian-bing ZHANG. Effect of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria and phosphorus on non-structural carbohydrate content and the carbon∶nitrogen∶phosphorus stoichiometry of alfalfa roots [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 40-50. |
| [13] | Lei ZHANG, Jin-tao DU, Qian-yu FAN, Shun LI, Song-juan GAO, Wei-dong CAO. Response of biological nitrogen fixation by milk vetch to soil fertility and rhizobium inoculation [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 51-63. |
| [14] | Ya-qi FENG, Jia-hui CHEN, Jing-ni ZHANG, Chao SUI, Ji-wei CHEN, Zhi-peng LIU, Qiang ZHOU, Wen-xian LIU. Development of high-protein and high-yield associated InDel molecular markers based on re-sequencing in alfalfa [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(4): 137-149. |
| [15] | Nan GUO, Wu-chen DU, Shou-kun JI, Jian LIU, Su-qian CUI, Hui YUAN, Xu HAN, Ji-shuang LIU, Li-jie GAO. Effects of different fertilization and reseeding rates on the nutrient content of forage in a mountain meadow and its rumen fermentation parameters [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(4): 150-163. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||