Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 146-153.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020584
Jun-nian LI1(), Shao-hua KANG2, Dong-mei YANG1, Qian HE1, Shuang LI1, Shuang-lun TAO1
Received:
2020-12-29
Revised:
2020-03-11
Online:
2021-07-09
Published:
2021-07-09
Contact:
Jun-nian LI
Jun-nian LI, Shao-hua KANG, Dong-mei YANG, Qian HE, Shuang LI, Shuang-lun TAO. Effects of substituting dietary alfalfa meal with kudzu vine (Pueraria lobata) meal on serum biochemical indexes, apparent nutrient digestibility and growth performance in Boer crossbred goats[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 146-153.
原料Ingredients | 对照Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
玉米Corn (%) | 34.60 | 34.60 | 34.60 | 34.60 | 34.60 |
豆粕Soybean meal (%) | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 |
葛藤草粉Kudzu vine meal (%) | 0.00 | 10.00 | 20.00 | 30.00 | 40.00 |
小麸皮Wheat brain (%) | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
苜蓿草粉Alfalfa meal (%) | 40.00 | 30.00 | 20.00 | 10.00 | 0.00 |
玉米秸秆Corn stalk (%) | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
食盐NaCl (%) | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
磷酸氢钙CaHPO4 (%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
预混料1) Premix (%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
合计Total (%) | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
营养水平Nutrient levels | 对照Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
消化能2)Digestible energy (MJ·kg-1) | 10.30 | 10.30 | 10.30 | 10.20 | 10.20 |
粗蛋白质Crude protein (%) | 14.20 | 14.20 | 14.20 | 14.20 | 14.20 |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 32.15 | 33.25 | 33.45 | 34.56 | 35.64 |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber (%) | 22.14 | 22.56 | 22.15 | 23.54 | 24.14 |
钙Calcium (%) | 0.87 | 0.95 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 1.06 |
总磷Total phosphorus (%) | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.36 |
Table 1 Diet composition and nutrient levels of the experimental diets (air dry-basis)
原料Ingredients | 对照Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
玉米Corn (%) | 34.60 | 34.60 | 34.60 | 34.60 | 34.60 |
豆粕Soybean meal (%) | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 | 7.00 |
葛藤草粉Kudzu vine meal (%) | 0.00 | 10.00 | 20.00 | 30.00 | 40.00 |
小麸皮Wheat brain (%) | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 | 6.00 |
苜蓿草粉Alfalfa meal (%) | 40.00 | 30.00 | 20.00 | 10.00 | 0.00 |
玉米秸秆Corn stalk (%) | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 | 10.00 |
食盐NaCl (%) | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 |
磷酸氢钙CaHPO4 (%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
预混料1) Premix (%) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
合计Total (%) | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
营养水平Nutrient levels | 对照Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
消化能2)Digestible energy (MJ·kg-1) | 10.30 | 10.30 | 10.30 | 10.20 | 10.20 |
粗蛋白质Crude protein (%) | 14.20 | 14.20 | 14.20 | 14.20 | 14.20 |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 32.15 | 33.25 | 33.45 | 34.56 | 35.64 |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fiber (%) | 22.14 | 22.56 | 22.15 | 23.54 | 24.14 |
钙Calcium (%) | 0.87 | 0.95 | 1.04 | 1.05 | 1.06 |
总磷Total phosphorus (%) | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.36 |
项目 Items | 粗蛋白质 Crude protein | 粗脂肪 Ether extract | 中性洗涤纤维NDF | 酸性洗涤纤维ADF | 粗灰分 Crude ash | 钙 Calcium | 总磷 Total phosphorus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
葛藤茎叶粉Kudzu vine meal | 20.18 | 2.45 | 47.21 | 37.21 | 11.02 | 1.56 | 0.48 |
苜蓿粉Alfalfa meal | 19.91 | 2.21 | 40.32 | 30.13 | 9.68 | 1.54 | 0.52 |
Table 2 Nutrient component contents of kudzu vine meal and alfalfa meal (%,DM basis)
项目 Items | 粗蛋白质 Crude protein | 粗脂肪 Ether extract | 中性洗涤纤维NDF | 酸性洗涤纤维ADF | 粗灰分 Crude ash | 钙 Calcium | 总磷 Total phosphorus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
葛藤茎叶粉Kudzu vine meal | 20.18 | 2.45 | 47.21 | 37.21 | 11.02 | 1.56 | 0.48 |
苜蓿粉Alfalfa meal | 19.91 | 2.21 | 40.32 | 30.13 | 9.68 | 1.54 | 0.52 |
项目Items | 对照 Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干物质Dry matter (%) | 72.24±1.46b | 73.75±2.01ab | 74.45±1.65a | 75.65±2.03a | 75.85±1.86a | 1.993 | 0.171 |
粗蛋白质Crude protein (%) | 72.13±1.59b | 73.31±1.85ab | 74.45±2.04a | 74.39±1.54a | 75.55±1.68a | 1.647 | 0.237 |
粗脂肪Ether extract (%) | 73.67±2.13a | 72.85±1.68a | 73.42±1.44a | 72.57±1.69a | 72.95±2.04a | 0.181 | 0.943 |
中性洗涤纤维NDF (%) | 36.85±1.67b | 37.04±1.68ab | 38.65±1.23a | 38.65±1.62a | 38.64±1.58a | 1.070 | 0.421 |
酸性洗涤纤维ADF (%) | 31.58±2.15a | 31.20±2.03a | 32.45±2.01a | 30.54±1.35a | 31.55±1.65a | 0.415 | 0.794 |
钙Calcium (%) | 31.55±1.45a | 31.47±1.35a | 31.54±1.85a | 32.04±1.30a | 32.21±1.25a | 0.162 | 0.953 |
总磷Total phosphorus (%) | 45.76±1.31a | 44.35±1.23a | 45.62±1.47a | 44.98±1.68a | 45.67±1.26a | 0.556 | 0.700 |
Table 3 Effects of substituting dietary alfalfa meal by kudzu vine meal on apparent nutrient digestibility in Boer crossbred goats
项目Items | 对照 Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% | F | P |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
干物质Dry matter (%) | 72.24±1.46b | 73.75±2.01ab | 74.45±1.65a | 75.65±2.03a | 75.85±1.86a | 1.993 | 0.171 |
粗蛋白质Crude protein (%) | 72.13±1.59b | 73.31±1.85ab | 74.45±2.04a | 74.39±1.54a | 75.55±1.68a | 1.647 | 0.237 |
粗脂肪Ether extract (%) | 73.67±2.13a | 72.85±1.68a | 73.42±1.44a | 72.57±1.69a | 72.95±2.04a | 0.181 | 0.943 |
中性洗涤纤维NDF (%) | 36.85±1.67b | 37.04±1.68ab | 38.65±1.23a | 38.65±1.62a | 38.64±1.58a | 1.070 | 0.421 |
酸性洗涤纤维ADF (%) | 31.58±2.15a | 31.20±2.03a | 32.45±2.01a | 30.54±1.35a | 31.55±1.65a | 0.415 | 0.794 |
钙Calcium (%) | 31.55±1.45a | 31.47±1.35a | 31.54±1.85a | 32.04±1.30a | 32.21±1.25a | 0.162 | 0.953 |
总磷Total phosphorus (%) | 45.76±1.31a | 44.35±1.23a | 45.62±1.47a | 44.98±1.68a | 45.67±1.26a | 0.556 | 0.700 |
项目 Items | 对照Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
谷丙转氨酶ALT (U·L-1) | 26.21±1.02a | 25.71±1.23a | 25.21±2.04a | 25.87±2.04a | 26.01±2.02a |
谷草转氨酶GOT (U·L-1) | 83.32±6.25a | 80.56±7.15a | 84.42±6.01a | 84.32±5.14a | 83.25±7.36a |
总抗氧化能力T-AOC (U·mL-1) | 3.98±1.20c | 4.32±1.11b | 4.82±1.15b | 5.25±1.25a | 5.35±1.38a |
过氧化氢酶CAT (U·mL-1) | 3.50±1.06c | 4.65±1.21b | 4.78±1.23b | 4.95±1.45b | 5.23±1.18a |
谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶GSH-Px (U·mL-1) | 125.36±23.14c | 136.47±28.14b | 148.65±26.47a | 150.72±32.15a | 151.25±36.42a |
超氧化物歧化酶SOD (U·mL-1) | 127.35±12.65c | 134.68±18.65b | 136.65±8.45a | 137.32±9.55a | 138.56±8.67a |
丙二醛MDA (nmol·mL-1) | 3.54±1.07a | 3.14±1.02b | 2.84±1.20c | 2.64±1.12c | 2.61±1.45c |
Table 4 Effects of substituting dietary alfalfa meal by kudzu vine meal on serum biochemical indices of Boer crossbred goats
项目 Items | 对照Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
谷丙转氨酶ALT (U·L-1) | 26.21±1.02a | 25.71±1.23a | 25.21±2.04a | 25.87±2.04a | 26.01±2.02a |
谷草转氨酶GOT (U·L-1) | 83.32±6.25a | 80.56±7.15a | 84.42±6.01a | 84.32±5.14a | 83.25±7.36a |
总抗氧化能力T-AOC (U·mL-1) | 3.98±1.20c | 4.32±1.11b | 4.82±1.15b | 5.25±1.25a | 5.35±1.38a |
过氧化氢酶CAT (U·mL-1) | 3.50±1.06c | 4.65±1.21b | 4.78±1.23b | 4.95±1.45b | 5.23±1.18a |
谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶GSH-Px (U·mL-1) | 125.36±23.14c | 136.47±28.14b | 148.65±26.47a | 150.72±32.15a | 151.25±36.42a |
超氧化物歧化酶SOD (U·mL-1) | 127.35±12.65c | 134.68±18.65b | 136.65±8.45a | 137.32±9.55a | 138.56±8.67a |
丙二醛MDA (nmol·mL-1) | 3.54±1.07a | 3.14±1.02b | 2.84±1.20c | 2.64±1.12c | 2.61±1.45c |
项目Items | 对照Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
血清白蛋白ALB (g·L-1) | 45.21±1.25a | 45.72±2.24a | 46.31±2.14a | 46.21±1.56a | 46.21±1.32a |
免疫球蛋白A IgA (g·L-1) | 0.19±0.03b | 0.22±0.02a | 0.23±0.04a | 0.24±0.03a | 0.23±0.02a |
免疫球蛋白G IgG (g·L-1) | 0.74±0.05b | 0.79±0.04a | 0.81±0.05a | 0.83±0.02a | 0.82±0.04a |
免疫球蛋白M IgM (g·L-1) | 0.033±0.006b | 0.036±0.005a | 0.037±0.004a | 0.038±0.003a | 0.037±0.002a |
溶菌酶LSZ (μg·mL-1) | 0.60±0.27a | 0.65±0.26a | 0.66±0.31a | 0.67±0.28a | 0.66±0.27a |
Table 5 Effects of substituting dietary alfalfa meal by kudzu vine meal on immunity of Boer crossbred goats
项目Items | 对照Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
血清白蛋白ALB (g·L-1) | 45.21±1.25a | 45.72±2.24a | 46.31±2.14a | 46.21±1.56a | 46.21±1.32a |
免疫球蛋白A IgA (g·L-1) | 0.19±0.03b | 0.22±0.02a | 0.23±0.04a | 0.24±0.03a | 0.23±0.02a |
免疫球蛋白G IgG (g·L-1) | 0.74±0.05b | 0.79±0.04a | 0.81±0.05a | 0.83±0.02a | 0.82±0.04a |
免疫球蛋白M IgM (g·L-1) | 0.033±0.006b | 0.036±0.005a | 0.037±0.004a | 0.038±0.003a | 0.037±0.002a |
溶菌酶LSZ (μg·mL-1) | 0.60±0.27a | 0.65±0.26a | 0.66±0.31a | 0.67±0.28a | 0.66±0.27a |
项目Items | 对照Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
始重Initial weight (kg) | 18.41±1.20a | 18.45±1.13a | 18.98±1.55a | 18.50±1.35a | 18.36±1.29a |
末重Finial weight (kg) | 26.22±1.22b | 26.83±1.36b | 27.82±1.48a | 28.67±1.52a | 27.35±1.23a |
平均日增重ADG (g) | 164.40±1.29c | 167.63±1.25c | 176.60±1.45b | 203.40±1.66a | 179.80±1.24b |
平均日采食量ADFI (g) | 1703.34±55.64a | 1772.26±120.34a | 1780.31±105.44a | 1782.50±126.21a | 1769.12±113.24a |
料重比F/G | 10.39±0.36a | 10.61±0.19a | 10.08±0.25a | 8.78±0.37b | 8.84±0.39b |
Table 6 Effects of substituting dietary alfalfa meal by kudzu vine meal on growth performance of Boer crossbred goats
项目Items | 对照Control | 25% | 50% | 75% | 100% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
始重Initial weight (kg) | 18.41±1.20a | 18.45±1.13a | 18.98±1.55a | 18.50±1.35a | 18.36±1.29a |
末重Finial weight (kg) | 26.22±1.22b | 26.83±1.36b | 27.82±1.48a | 28.67±1.52a | 27.35±1.23a |
平均日增重ADG (g) | 164.40±1.29c | 167.63±1.25c | 176.60±1.45b | 203.40±1.66a | 179.80±1.24b |
平均日采食量ADFI (g) | 1703.34±55.64a | 1772.26±120.34a | 1780.31±105.44a | 1782.50±126.21a | 1769.12±113.24a |
料重比F/G | 10.39±0.36a | 10.61±0.19a | 10.08±0.25a | 8.78±0.37b | 8.84±0.39b |
1 | Ding Y F. Value and development of Pueraria lobata. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2003, 18(3): 86-89. |
丁艳芳.葛藤的价值及其开发前景.西北林学院学报, 2003, 18(3): 86-89. | |
2 | Zhang Y X. Study on the introduction and industrialization development of puerariae seed. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2007(5): 94-95 |
张跃行. 葛良种引进及产业化发展研究. 福建农业科技, 2007(5): 94-95 | |
3 | Zheng X, Liu T M, Zhu S Y, et al. Research progress in forage of pueraria. China Feed, 2016, 24(6): 16-18 |
郑霞, 刘头明, 朱四元, 等. 葛藤饲用化研究进展. 中国饲料, 2016, 24(6): 16-18 | |
4 | Dong Z, Li H X, Zhang M M, et al. Identification and immunomodulatory activity of a acidic polysaccharide from the Pueraria lobate (Willd.) Ohwi root. Modern Food Science and Technology, 2018, 34(7): 68-75. |
董洲, 李惠娴, 张猛猛, 等. 野葛根酸性多糖的结构鉴定及免疫活性. 现代食品科技, 2018, 34(7): 68-75. | |
5 | Wu D, Liu P P, Li M, et al. Evaluation of antioxidant and anti-aging effect of pueraria water extracts and pueraria fermentation broth in vitro. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(12): 285-290, 294. |
吴迪, 刘平平, 李萌, 等. 葛根水提液及葛根发酵液的体外抗氧化及抗衰老功效评价. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(12): 285-290, 294. | |
6 | Lai J Y, Li X B. The chemical components, medical functions and use of Pueraria lobata. Agriculture and Technology, 2018, 38(20): 36. |
赖建有, 李兴波.葛根的化学成分和药理作用和用途.农业与技术, 2018, 38(20): 36. | |
7 | Luo Q S, Du H Y, Xiong J H, et al. Extraction process optimization of Pueraria isoflavones and studies on its antioxidant activity. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2015, 15(2): 104-110. |
罗秋水, 杜华英, 熊建华, 等. 葛根异黄酮类化合物提取工艺优化及其抗氧化活性研究. 中国食品学报, 2015, 15(2): 104-110. | |
8 | Wang X F, Zhang L, Yuan X Z. Influence of phosphorus fertilization and inoculation of acid-tolerant rhizobium on the alfalfa-rhizobia symbiosis in acid yellow soil. Ecology and Environmental Monitoring of Three Gorges, 2018, 3(1): 59-65, 74. |
王晓锋, 张磊, 袁兴中. 施磷与接种耐酸根瘤菌对酸性黄壤中紫花苜蓿生长、结瘤的影响. 三峡生态环境监测, 2018, 3(1): 59-65, 74. | |
9 | Shao C G, Wang H, Bi Y F. Relationship between endogenous polyamines and tolerance in Medicago sativa L. under heat stress. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(6): 1214-1219. |
邵辰光, 王荟, 毕玉芬. 高温胁迫下紫花苜蓿多胺含量与耐热性的关系. 草地学报, 2015, 23(6): 1214-1219. | |
10 | Yan Q Q. Study on the root structure of alfafa under water logging condition in Southern China. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2013. |
严琼琼. 南方渍水条件下紫花苜蓿根系结构的研究. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2013. | |
11 | Chen D W. Animal nutrition and feed science. The 2rd edition. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2015. |
陈代文. 动物营养与饲料学. 第2版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2015. | |
12 | Ma J, Liu Y F, Liu H J, et al. Study on silage characteristics of Pennisetum sinese Roxb. Feed Study, 2015, 432(23): 1-5. |
马健, 刘艳芳, 刘红娇, 等. 禾王草的青贮特性研究. 饲料研究, 2015, 432(23): 1-5. | |
13 | Cao Y H, Yang F, Chen S M, et al. Nutritional value analysis of seven common forage plants in Southern China. China Feed, 2020, 661(17): 117-121. |
曹艳红, 杨帆, 陈少梅, 等. 南方七种常见饲用植物营养价值分析. 中国饲料, 2020, 661(17): 117-121. | |
14 | Zhang L Y. Feed analysis and quality test technology. The 3rd edition. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2007. |
张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 第3 版. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007. | |
15 | Mao F C, Zhao B S. Present utilization status of wild plant pueraria and its exploitation evaluation. Journal of Northwest Forest University, 1995, 10(3): 88-92, 97. |
毛富春, 赵伯善. 野生植物葛藤的研究利用现状及开发前景. 西北林学院学报, 1995, 10(3): 88-92, 97. | |
16 | Zhang Y J, Yu Z, Luo H L, et al. A study on the quality of silage of kudzu vine and corn. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2006, 42(23): 57-58. |
张英俊, 玉柱, 罗海玲, 等. 葛藤玉米混合青贮品质研究. 中国畜牧杂志, 2006, 42(23): 57-58. | |
17 | Yang D M, Tao S L, Liang J, et al. Effects of tannic acid additive on the quality of Kudzu stem and leaf silage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20(4): 784-787. |
杨冬梅, 陶双伦, 梁静, 等. 添加单宁酸对青贮葛藤茎叶品质的影响. 草地学报, 2012, 20(4): 784-787. | |
18 | Hyeon J C, Yoon H K, Yun H K, et al. Antioxidant and antibacterial effects of medicinal plants and their stick-type medicinal concentrated beverages. Food Science and Biotechnology, 2020, 29(10): 1413-1423. |
19 | Shang H L, Song X Z, Liu B, et al. Effects of puerarin on production performance and blood biochemical indexes of beef cattle under hot environment. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2018, 40(4): 803-809. |
尚含乐, 宋小珍, 刘博, 等.葛根素对夏季高温条件下肉牛生产性能及血液生化指标的影响.江西农业大学学报, 2018, 40(4): 803-809. | |
20 | Man C, Gan X Y, Yang J T.Effect of radix puerariae lobatae powder on growth performance in growing pigs.Feed and Animal Husbandry, 2009(5): 10-12. |
满晨, 干小英, 杨建涛. 葛根粉对生长猪生产性能的影响.饲料与畜牧, 2009(5): 10-12. | |
21 | Jung H, Kang A N, Kang S, et al. The root extract of Pueraria lobata and its main compound, puerarin, prevent obesity by increasing the energy metabolism in skeletal muscle. Nutrients, 2017, 9(1): 33. |
22 | LiX F, Yuan T T, Xu H X, et al. Whole-cell catalytic synthesis of puerarin monoesters and analysis of their antioxidant activities. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2019, 67(1): 299-307. |
23 | Zhao X Y, Li L, Xu Y M. Effects of puerarin on proliferation of bovine artery endothelial cells. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Medical Sciences), 2009, 44(6): 1250-1253. |
赵雪艳, 李凌, 许予明. 葛根素对牛主动脉内皮细胞增殖的影响. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2009, 44(6): 1250-1253. | |
24 | Guerra M C, Speroni E, Broccoli M, et al. Comparison between Chinese medical herb Pueraria lobata crude extract and its main isoflavone puerarin: Antioxidant properties and effects on rat liver CYP-catalysed drug metabolism. Life Sciences, 2000, 67(24): 2997-3006. |
25 | Zhang D W, Dai S J, Li G H, et al. Chemical constituents in cane of Pueraria lobata. Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, 2011, 42(4): 649-651. |
张德武, 戴胜军, 李贵海, 等. 野葛藤的化学成分研究. 中草药, 2011, 42(4): 649-651. | |
26 | Liu B, Chen Y M, Song X Z, et al. Effects of dietary puerarin flavonoids on growth performance and meat quality of arbor aacre broilers. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2016, 28(7): 2243-2249. |
刘博, 陈玉敏, 宋小珍, 等. 饲粮中添加葛根总黄酮对爱拔益加肉鸡生长性能及肉品质的影响. 动物营养学报, 2016, 28(7): 2243-2249. | |
27 | Wang J C, Sun Z Z, Li S H, et al. Effects of puerarin on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, immune organ index and anti-oxidate index of broilers. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2020(17): 115-120. |
汪纪仓, 孙真真, 李思涵, 等. 葛根素对肉鸡生长性能、屠宰性能、肉品质、免疫器官指数及血清抗氧化指标的影响. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2020(17): 115-120. | |
28 | Zhang C Q, Gu M. Kudzu vine, a forage crop with higher exploitable potentiality in Guizhou. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 1998, 26(4): 9-12. |
张川黔, 顾明. 贵州极有开发潜力的饲用植物——葛藤. 贵州农业科学, 1998, 26(4): 9-12. | |
29 | Pang T D, Shi J, Deng S Y, et al. Research on the feeding effect of fermented kudzu vine on broilers. Feed Industry, 2020, 41(15): 24-28. |
庞天德, 史静, 邓素媛, 等. 发酵葛藤饲喂肉鸡效果研究. 饲料工业, 2020, 41(15): 24-28. |
[1] | REN Chun-yan, BI Yan-liang, DU Han-chang, YU Bo, TU Yan, GUO Yan-li, DIAO Qi-yu. Effects of different starter NDF levels on the growth performance, rumen environments and serum biochemical parameters of calves [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(5): 210-218. |
[2] | ZHANG Yong, GUO Hai-Ming, TANG Zhi-Hong, CAO Kai, WANG Yang-Po, YE Jun-An. Effects of pelleted rape straw feed on productive performance, rumen fermentation parameters, and blood biochemical indexes of Hu sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(10): 171-179. |
[3] | WANG Ling, LV Yong-Yan, CHENG Zhi-Wei, DU Gao-Tang, LI Jin-Lin, FU Shi-Jun, SUN Guo-Qiang. Milk production, nitrogen excretion and blood biochemical parameter responses to dietary addition of compound yeast cultures in dairy cows [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(12): 121-130. |
[4] | HU Yongling, YE Shili, LUO Jiajie. Effect of Chinese herbal medicine on milk production, antioxidant capacity and immunity of dairy cows [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(1): 132-140. |
[5] | DONG Hai-bo,WANG Shao-qing,JIA Yuan-yuan,DUANMU Yong-qian,TAO Shi-yu,NI Ying-dong,ZHANG Yuan-shu,ZHUANG Su,SHEN Xiang-zhen,ZHAO Ru-qian. Effect of long-term feeding of high concentrate diet on plasma biochemical parameters and expression of genes involved in glucose metabolism in lactating goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(5): 295-302. |
[6] | ZHENG Wei, ZHU Jin-zhong, Jianaerguli. A comprehensive evaluation of the productive performance of legume-grass mixtures under different mixed sowing patterns [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(6): 242-251. |
[7] | WANG Dian, LI Fa-di, ZHANG Yang-dong, BU Deng-pan, SUN Peng, ZHOU Ling-yun. Mixed silage of potato pulp and corn straw affects growth performance, ruminant environments and blood biochemical parameters of mutton sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(5): 47-54. |
[8] | WANG Hong-bo, GUO Jiang-peng, LI Fa-di, HAO Zheng-li, YAN Ping. Effect of nutrition level on reproductive performance of Tan×Small Tail Han crossbred ewes [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(6): 254-263. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||