Welcome to Acta Prataculturae Sinica ! Today is Share:

Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2010, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5): 103-112.

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Modeling the evapotranspiration of an alpine meadow ecosystem in the northern Tibet Plateau based on MODIS images

FU Gang1,2, SHEN Zhen-xi1, ZHANG Xian-zhou1, WU Jian-shuang1,2, SHI Pei-li1   

  1. 1.Lhasa Plateau Ecosystem Research Station, Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and
    Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Beijing 100101, China;

    2.Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2009-11-03 Online:2010-05-25 Published:2010-10-20

Abstract: Evapotranspiration (ET) is an important component of the hydrologic budget in alpine meadow ecosystems of the Tibet Plateau. The water use efficiency (WUEEC) at the ecosystem level was used to model ET. Simple linear correlation analysis and multiple stepwise linear regression analysis showed that normalized difference vegetation indices (NDVI), relative air humidity (Ha), and heat flux (H) could play important roles on the WUEEC. We related WUEEC with NDVI, Ha, and H, separately (there were significant discrepancies in water use efficiency modeled by H, WUEH, and WUEEC). We modeled evapotranspiration at the ecosystem scale with the multiple stepwise linear regression equations of water use efficiency (WUE) and estimated gross primary production (GPPVPM) by a vegetation photosynthesis model (VPM). The simple linear regression equations between modeled evapotranspiration, ETNDVI, ETHa, and observed evapotranspiration from eddy covariance of ETEC, ETNDVI=1.298 5ETEC (R2=0.802 9, n=46, P<0.000 1) and ETHa=1.311 8ETEC (R2=0.748 7, n=46, P<0.000 1), individually, showed some discrepancies in modeled evapotranspiration and ETEC. We quantitatively analyzed these discrepancies. The differences between ETEC and ETNDVI were chiefly attributable to photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) and GPPVPM, while the differences between ETEC and ETHa were mainly attributed to PAR, GPPVPM, and enhanced vegetation indices (EVI).

CLC Number: