Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (9): 135-145.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018577
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Xia, LI Miao-shan, ZHOU En-guang, WANG Hu-cheng*
Received:
2018-08-31
Revised:
2018-10-08
Online:
2019-09-20
Published:
2019-09-20
Contact:
*E-mail: ZHANG Xia, LI Miao-shan, ZHOU En-guang, WANG Hu-cheng. An in vitro study of fermentation properties of four high-quality forages and their mixtures treated with rumen fluid from beef cattle in northwest China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(9): 135-145.
[1] Mazzenga A, Gianesella M, Brscic M, [2] Yang D Y, Hao L Z, Liu S J, 杨得玉, 郝力壮, 刘书杰, 等. 青海省反刍动物常用粗饲料营养价值研究进展. 饲料工业, 2018, 39(1): 20-23. [3] Jin E W, Zhou L Y, Bu D P, 金恩望, 周凌云, 卜登攀, 等. 体外产气法在动物营养学中应用的研究进展. 中国畜牧兽医, 2012, 39(10): 128-133. [4] Mauricio R M, Mould F L, Dhanoa M S, [5] Guo Y J, Long R J, Zhang D G, 郭彦军, 龙瑞军, 张德罡, 等. 利用体外产气法测定高山牧草和灌木的干物质降解率. 草业学报, 2003, 12(2): 54-60. [6] Han X M, Cao Y F, Li Q F, 韩肖敏, 曹玉凤, 李秋凤, 等. 用体外产气法评价玉米秸秆、稻草、玉米秸秆青贮与精料的组合效应. 动物营养学报, 2017, 29(2): 699-711. [7] Zhang J X, Liu J B, Xue B, 张建勋, 刘江波, 薛白, 等. 饲粮精粗比对南江黄羊瘤胃体外发酵的影响. 动物营养学报, 2013, 25(4): 870-877. [8] Sun G Q, Lü Y Y, Zhang J J.Study on the combined effect of whole plant corn silage and peanut vine and 孙国强, 吕永艳, 张杰杰. 利用体外瘤胃发酵法研究全株玉米青贮与花生蔓和羊草间的组合效应. 草业学报, 2014, 23(3): 224-231. [9] Zhang J Z, Zou Q H, Wang J F, 张吉鹍, 邹庆华, 王金芬, 等. 稻草与多水平苜蓿混合瘤胃体外发酵组合效应的整体研究. 饲料工业, 2011, 32(17): 40-48. [10] Li Y, Han X M, Li J G, 李妍, 韩肖敏, 李建国, 等. 体外法评价玉米秸秆、谷草和玉米秸秆青贮饲料组合效应研究. 草业学报, 2017, 26(5): 213-223. [11] Meng M J, Tu Y L, Bai Y F, 孟梅娟, 涂远璐, 白云峰, 等. 小麦秸秆与米糠粕瘤胃体外发酵组合效应研究. 草业学报, 2016, 25(9): 161-172. [12] He Y, Wang H R, Xu J H, 贺瑶, 王洪荣, 徐进昊, 等. 体外产气法和尼龙袋法评定苎麻的饲用价值. 动物营养学报, 2017, 29(2): 690-698. [13] Jin E W, Wang J Q, Bu D P, 金恩望, 王加启, 卜登攀, 等. 利用体外产气法研究植物精油对瘤胃体外发酵和甲烷生成的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2013, 18(3): 120-127. [14] Huang Y L, Zou C X, Wei S J, 黄雅莉, 邹彩霞, 韦升菊, 等. 体外产气法研究半胱胺对水牛瘤胃发酵参数和甲烷产量的影响. 动物营养学报, 2014, 26(1): 125-133. [15] Li M S, Xue S Y, Wang C, 李满双, 薛树媛, 王超, 等. 体外产气法研究沙柳混合发酵饲料对绵羊瘤胃内环境参数的影响. 动物营养学报, 2015, 27(6): 1943-1953. [16] Chen Z L, Wang Z S, Xue B, 陈智亮, 王之盛, 薛白, 等. 氮源和水平对肉牛体外瘤胃发酵特性的影响. 动物营养学报, 2012, 24(6): 1150-1156. [17] Menke K H, Steingawss H.Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research, 1988, 28: 7-55. [18] Ørskov E R, McDonald I. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1979, 92(2): 499-503. [19] Zhou J W.Adaptability of Tibetan sheep to nitrogen nutrition stress on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2015. 周建伟. 藏羊对青藏高原氮素营养胁迫的适应性研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2015. [20] Li X Y.Effects of feeding time of flaxseed diet on growth and fattening performance and meat quality of lambs. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2017. 李晓亚. 亚麻籽饲粮饲喂时间对羔羊生长育肥性能和肉品质的影响. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2017. [21] Wang X.Study on the scientific matching of roughage and the optimization technology of sheep diet formula system by using GI technology. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2003. 王旭. 利用GI技术对粗饲料进行科学搭配及绵羊日粮配方系统优化技术的研究. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2003. [22] Lei D Z, Jin S G, Wu R T N. Evaluation of the combined effects of different roughages and the same concentrate by 雷冬至, 金曙光, 乌仁塔娜. 用体外产气法评价不同粗饲料与相同精料间的组合效应. 饲料工业, 2009, 30(3): 30-33. [23] Menke K H, Raab L, Salewskl A, [24] Bu T L.Evaluation of the combined effects of silage corn, 布同良. 体外产气法评定青贮玉米、羊草和苜蓿草之间的组合效应. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2006. [25] Rocha J L, Baker J F, Womack J E, [26] Yang Z L, Li Q F, Cao Y F, 杨志林, 李秋凤, 曹玉凤, 等. 体外产气法评定全株玉米青贮与谷草的组合效应研究. 中国畜牧兽医, 2017, 44(3): 698-707. [27] Zhao X, Dong K H, Wang Y X, 赵祥, 董宽虎, 王永新, 等. 不同精粗比全混合饲料在绵羊瘤胃内的降解动态. 草业学报, 2005, 14(3): 9-11. [28] Xue H F, Meng Q X.Progress in research on neutral detergent fiber nutrition of dairy cows. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2007, 19(1): 454-458. 薛红枫, 孟庆翔. 奶牛中性洗涤纤维营养研究进展. 动物营养学报, 2007, 19(1): 454-458. [29] Li Y F, Hao J X, Ma Y Y, 李袁飞, 郝建祥, 马艳艳, 等. 体外瘤胃发酵法评定不同类型饲料的营养价值. 动物营养学报, 2013, 25(10): 2403-2413. [30] Hoover W H.Chemical factors involved in ruminal fiber digestion. Journal of Dairy Science, 1986, 69: 2755-2766. [31] Hu M, Lu D X, Niu W Y, 胡明, 卢德勋, 牛文艺, 等. 不同阴阳离子水平日粮对绵羊瘤胃内环境参数的影响. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2002, 23(5): 7-8. [32] Di B. 刁波. 体外产气法评价牦牛冷季补饲草料与玉树地区天然牧草的组合效应. 西宁: 青海大学, 2013. [33] Chen W J, Sun P F, Zhang X D, [34] Feng Y L.Nutrition of ruminant animals. Beijing:Science Press, 2004: 136-138. 冯仰廉. 反刍动物营养学. 北京:科学出版社 , 2004: 136-138. [35] Xiong B H, Pang Z H, Luo Q Y.China feed ingredients and nutritional value table (22 Edition). China Feed, 2011, (21): 37-43. 熊本海, 庞之洪, 罗清尧. 中国饲料成分及营养价值表(22版). 中国饲料, 2011, (21): 37-43. [36] Zhang J J.Modeling of roughage grading index parameters and combined effects of roughage scientific collocation. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2004. 张吉鹃. 粗饲料分级指数参数的模型化及粗饲料科学搭配的组合效应研究. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2004. [37] Wang S, Shi L F, Zhang Z B, 王珊, 史良峰, 张振斌, 等. 麻叶荨麻和羊草比例对体外培养瘤胃微生物发酵参数的影响. 家畜生态学报, 2018, 39(4): 39-43. [38] Wang D L, Fang J, Xing F, [39] Spears J W, Schlegel P, Seal M C, [40] Hu W L.Study on the effect of saponin on rumen fermentation and methane production and animal performance. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2005. 胡伟莲. 皂甙对瘤胃发酵与甲烷产量及动物生产性能影响的研究. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2005. [41] Mo F.Nutritional needs of ruminants and evaluation and application of feed nutrient value.Beijing:China Agricultural University Press, 2011. 莫放. 反刍动物营养需要及饲料营养价值评定与应用. 北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2011. [42] Zhang S J, Chandhy A S, Osman A.Associative effects of ensiling mixtures of sweet sorghum and alfalfa on nutritive value, fermentation and methane characteristics. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2015, 206: 29-38. [43] Li J G, An Y F.Standardized production technology of dairy cows. Beijing:China Agricultural University Press, 2003: 105. 李建国, 安永福. 奶牛标准化生产技术. 北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2003: 105. [44] Shi H L, Wang L Q, Xi L Q, 史卉玲, 王连群, 席琳乔, 等. 利用体外产气法研究苜蓿青贮与玉米青贮组合效应的瘤胃发酵特征. 新疆农业科学, 2013, 50(7): 1353-1359. |
[1] | DONG Wen-cheng, LIN Yu-fan, ZHU Hong-fu, ZHANG Huan, ZHANG Gui-jie. Effects of different grape variety on proteolysis and aerobic stability of alfalfa silage made with added grape pomace [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(4): 129-137. |
[2] | KONG Fan-lin, DIAO Qi-yu, QU Jian-jiang, TU Yan. Ruminal degradation characteristics of Broussonetia papyrifera in beef cattle [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(3): 179-189. |
[3] | MAO Cui, LIU Fang-yuan, SONG En-liang, WANG Ya-fang, WANG Yong-jun, ZHAN Xiang, LI Yuan, CHENG Hai-jian, JIANG Fu-gui. Effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculant level and ensiling time on nutritional value and fermentation quality of whole-crop maize silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(10): 172-181. |
[4] | LI Fei-fei, ZHANG Fan-fan, WANG Xu-zhe, MIAO Fang, MA Chun-hui. Effects of homo-and heterofermentative lactic acid bacteria on the nutritional quality and ruminal degradation rate of the whole plant maize silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(6): 128-136. |
[5] | LIANG Ting-yu, LANG Xia, WU Jian-ping, WANG Cai-lian, LIU Li-shan, ZHANG Rui, WEI Sheng. Effect of different proportions of oat hay and alfalfa on in vitro fermentation in simulated donkey ceca [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(6): 185-195. |
[6] | LI Fei-fei, ZHANG Fan-fan, WANG Xu-zhe, TANG Kai-ting, MA Chun-hui. Effects of cutting date and crop growth stage on alfalfa silage quality [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(12): 137-148. |
[7] | SUN Xue-li, LI Qiu-feng, LIU Ying-cai, CAO Yu-feng, WANG Zeng-lin, LI Yi, ZHAO Yang-yang, GE Han-cong, LIU Tao-tao, ZHAO Li-xin. Effects of whole-plant corn silage on performance, digestibility and blood biochemical parameters in Simmental crossbred bulls [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(9): 201-209. |
[8] | WANG Xu-Zhe, JIA Shu-An, ZHANG Fan-Fan, LU Wei-Hua, ZHANG Qian-Bing, MA Chun-Hui. Fermentation quality and microbial quantity during aerobic storage of corn silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(9): 156-166. |
[9] | MIAO Fang, ZHANG Fan-Fan, TANG Kai-Ting, JIA Shu-An, WANG Xu-Zhe, MA Chun-Hui. Effects of homo- and hetero-fermentative lactic acid bacteria on the fermentation characteristics, nutritional quality, and aerobic stability of whole corn silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(9): 167-175. |
[10] | WEI Ming, CUI Zhi-Hao, CHEN Zhi-Qiang, ZHENG Yue, YAN Pei-Shi. Comparing the calculation of corn silage’s effective energy value for beef cattle using direct and regression methods [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(11): 113-122. |
[11] | ZHU Xiao-Yan, ZHAO Cheng, SHI Ying-Hua, WANG Cheng-Zhang, YAO Guo-Lei, LV Xian-Zhao, HAN Kang-Kang, LI Dong-Dong. Effect of replacing alfalfa hay with alfalfa silage on production performance and milk quality in dairy cows [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(5): 156-164. |
[12] | HU Jiang, WANG Yi, ZHAO Fang-Fang, LIU Xiu, QUAN Jin-Peng, NIU Xiao-Liang, HAN Xiang-Min. Effects of straw pellets on rumen function and live weight gain of beef cattle [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(10): 163-170. |
[13] | SUN Guo-qiang,LV Yong-yan,ZHANG Jie-jie. A study on the associative effect of whole corn silage-peanut vine and Leymus chinensis by rumen fermentation in vitro [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(3): 224-231. |
[14] | ZHANG Zhen-wei,WANG Cong,LIU Qiang,BAI Yuan-sheng,SHI Zhou-ge,LIU Xiao-ni,GAO Shu-wen. Effects of isobutyrate on daily gain, dietary nutrient digestion and methane emissions in Simmental beef cattle [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(1): 346-352. |
[15] | WANG Dian, LI Fa-di, ZHANG Yang-dong, BU Deng-pan, SUN Peng, ZHOU Ling-yun. Mixed silage of potato pulp and corn straw affects growth performance, ruminant environments and blood biochemical parameters of mutton sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(5): 47-54. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||