构树在肉牛瘤胃中降解特性的研究

doi:10.11686/cyxb2019260

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为使构树能够作为非常规饲料用于反刍动物养殖生产中,以3头安装有永久瘘管的24月龄安格斯肉牛为试验动物来探究构树在瘤胃中的降解特性和营养价值,使用瘤胃尼龙袋法测定构树的叶、去叶枝条、125~135 cm及145~155 cm高全株构树在瘤胃内的降解率和降解参数并计算瘤胃能氮平衡参数。结果表明:1) 叶的粗蛋白质(CP)水平高达23.18%,显著高于其他3种形态构树(P<0.05),全株构树的CP含量显著高于去叶枝条(P<0.05),而酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)则呈现相反规律,其中125~135 cm全株ADF含量低于145~155 cm全株(P>0.05);2) 叶的干物质(DM)、有机物(OM)、CP和ADF的有效降解率(ED)均显著大于125~135 cm和145~155 cm全株(P<0.05),三者又均显著大于去叶枝条(P<0.05),四者DM的ED均在40%以上,叶为65.82%;3) 叶的瘤胃降解蛋白(RDP)与过瘤胃蛋白(RUP)之比显著高于其他3种形态构树(P<0.05),说明叶的RDP含量高于RUP含量,而其他3种形态构树RUP含量高于RDP含量;4) 叶的瘤胃能氮平衡值(RENB)为负(-22.27 g·kg^-1),去叶枝条、125~135 cm及145~155 cm全株的RENB为正,分别为28.79、30.87和27.74 g·kg^-1。结论:4种形态构树的营养价值依次为叶>125~135 cm全株>145~155 cm全株>去叶枝条。其中,构树叶可作为蛋白质饲料使用,其他3种形态构树可以粗饲料的形式使用,4种形态构树均有成为优质饲料资源的潜力,但是在使用时应注意保持能氮平衡。

关键词: 构树, 全株, 瘤胃降解率, 刈割高度, 肉牛

Abstract: In order to evaluate the potential of Broussonetia papyrifera for use in ruminant production as an unconventional feed, three beef cattle aged 24 months, each with a permanent rumen fistula, were used to investigate the degradability characteristics and nutritive value of different plant parts of B. papyrifera. Leaves, leafless branches, and whole plants of B. papyrifera were evaluated with a nylon bag technique, to calculate ruminal energy and nitrogen balance using digestibility and degradation parameters. Tests were carried out for smaller (height 125-135 cm) and larger (height 145-155 cm) plants. It was found that: 1) Crude protein (CP) content of the leaves was 23.18%, which was significantly higher than branches or whole plants of B. papyrifera (P<0.05), while the CP contents of the whole plants were significantly higher than that of the leafless branches (P<0.05). As expected, the pattern of results for acid detergent fiber (ADF) was opposite to that for CP. The ADF content of 125-135 cm whole plants was lower than that of 145-155 cm whole plants (P>0.05). 2) For leaves, values for effective degradability (ED) of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), CP and ADF were significantly higher than for whole plants of either height range (P<0.05). Furthermore, leaves and whole plants of B. papyrifera had higher ED of DM, OM, CP and ADF than leafless branches (P<0.05). The ED of DM of all tested B. papyrifera materials was above 40%, and the ED of leaves was up to 66%. 3) The ratio of rumen degradable protein (RDP) to rumen undegradable protein (RUP) of leaves was significantly higher than that of branches or whole plants (P<0.05), indicating that RDP proportion was in leaves. For branches and whole plants, the RDP content was lower than RUP content. 4) Rumen energy nitrogen balance value (RENB) of leaves was negative (-22.27 g·kg^-1) while the RENB values of leafless branches (28.79 g·kg^-1), 125-135 cm whole plants (30.87 g·kg^-1) and 145-155 cm whole plants (27.74 g·kg^-1) were positive. In conclusion, the ranking for nutritive value of the tested B. papyrifera materials was: leaves>125-135 cm whole plants>145-155 cm whole plants>leafless branches. All of the tested materials have the potential for use in high-quality feeds. Leaves can be used as a dietary protein source, while branches or whole plants can be used as roughage. However, energy and nitrogen balance are practical details also needing to be considered.

Key words: Broussonetia papyrifera, whole plant, rumen degradability, cutting height, beef cattle

孔凡林, 刁其玉, 渠建江, 屠焰. 构树在肉牛瘤胃中降解特性的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 179-189.

KONG Fan-lin, DIAO Qi-yu, QU Jian-jiang, TU Yan. Ruminal degradation characteristics of Broussonetia papyrifera in beef cattle[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(3): 179-189.

参考文献

[1] Cao Z Y, Zhang W.Chinese flora (Moraceae). Beijing: Science Press, 1998: 1-13.
曹子余, 张吴. 中国植物志(桑科). 北京: 科学出版社, 1998: 1-13.
[2] Ding F, Yang F, Li D L, et al. Studies on the anatomical structure characteristics and drought resistance of broussonetia papyrifera. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(36): 20949-20952.
丁菲, 杨帆, 李德龙, 等. 构树解剖结构特征与抗旱性研究. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(36): 20949-20952.
[3] Liu Y P, Yao Y Y, Luo X Y, et al. Effects of heat stress on physiological and biochemical characters of several tree species. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 40(11): 126-128.
刘艳萍, 姚莹莹, 罗晓雅, 等. 高温胁迫对几种乔木树种生理生化特性的影响. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(11): 126-128.
[4] Min Z, Fang Y, Ji Y, et al. Effects of salt stress on ion content, antioxidant enzymes and protein profile in different tissues of Broussonetia papyrifera. South African Journal of Botany, 2013, 85(85): 1-9.
[5] Wang Z C, Shen S H.Characteristics and benefits of space hybrid broussonetia. Land Greening, 2013, (5): 47-48.
王子成, 沈世华. 航天杂交构树的特性与效益. 国土绿化, 2013, (5): 47-48.
[6] Peng X J, Shen S H.The paper mulberry: A novel model system for woody plant research. Bulletin of Botany, 2018, 53(3): 87-96.
彭献军, 沈世华. 构树:一种新型木本模式植物. 植物学报, 2018, 53(3): 87-96.
[7] Yang Q C, Chen S H, Liu Y.The effect of Broussonetia papyrifera leaf on the production performance, meat quality and apparent digestibility of fatting pigs. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 43(7): 133-137.
杨青春, 陈绍红, 刘铀. 构树叶对育肥猪生产性能、肉品质及营养物质表观消化率的影响. 河南农业科学, 2014, 43(7): 133-137.
[8] Zuo X, Chen Z, Xie Q, et al. Determination of nutrients and metabolic energy of geese in Broussonetia papyrifera leaves powder and Broussonetia papyrifera twig leaves powder from different areas. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2018, 30(7): 2823-2830.
左鑫, 陈哲, 谢强, 等. 不同产地构树叶粉和去叶构树叶粉营养成分及其鹅代谢能的测定. 动物营养学报, 2018, 30(7): 2823-2830.
[9] Bai T L, Luo L, Li J.Study on the components characteristics and mowing time in different growth period of hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera. Guizhou Forestry Science and Technology, 2018, 46(3): 18-20.
白廷龙, 罗李, 李姜. 杂交构树饲用林不同生长周期构件特性与刈割期的研究. 贵州林业科技, 2018, 46(3): 18-20.
[10] Zeng X Z, Wang X J, Li W G.Dynamic changes of three cell wall elements at different growth stage in rubber tree stem. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2016, 37(5): 910-914.
曾仙珍, 王祥军, 李维国. 不同生育期橡胶树幼茎细胞壁三要素的变化动态. 热带作物学报, 2016, 37(5): 910-914.
[11] National Research Council.Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. Washington DC, USA: National Academy Press, 2000.
[12] Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis. Arlington: Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1994.
[13] Ørskov E R, Mcdonald I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, 1979, 92(2): 499-503.
[14] Li Y, Diao Q Y, Kong L X, et al. Ruminal degradation characteristics of Moringa oleifera in dairy cows. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(10): 140-148.
李媛, 刁其玉, 孔路欣, 等. 辣木在奶牛瘤胃中的降解特性研究. 草业学报, 2017, 26(10): 140-148.
[15] Su H W, Yang Z J, Cao Z J, et al. Evaluation of energy nitrogen balance in total mixed rations on dairy cows using the principle of rumen energy nitrogen balance. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 47(9): 45-49.
苏华维, 杨再俊, 曹志军, 等. 利用瘤胃能氮平衡原理评价奶牛全混合日粮的能氮平衡. 中国畜牧杂志, 2011, 47(9): 45-49.
[16] Tu Y, Diao Q Y, Zhang R, et al. Analysis on the feed nutritive value of hybrid Broussonetia papyrifera leaf. Pratacultural Science, 2009, 26(6): 136-139.
屠焰, 刁其玉, 张蓉, 等. 杂交构树叶的饲用营养价值分析. 草业科学, 2009, 26(6): 136-139.
[17] Cao Z J, Shi H T, Li D F, et al. Progress on nutritional evaluation of ruminant feedstuff in China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(3): 1-19.
曹志军, 史海涛, 李德发, 等. 中国反刍动物饲料营养价值评定研究进展. 草业学报, 2015, 24(3): 1-19.
[18] Ma Y Y, Cheng Y F, Zhu W Y.Different origins and stubbles of alfalfa: Evaluation of nutritional value by an in vitro fermentation method. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2014, 26(8): 2421-2432.
马艳艳, 成艳芬, 朱伟云. 体外发酵法评价不同产地、不同茬次苜蓿的营养价值. 动物营养学报, 2014, 26(8): 2421-2432.
[19] Yin Z Q, Chao J F, Zhang L H, et al. Chemical constituents from Broussonetia papyrifera. Natural Product Research and Development, 2006, 18(3): 420-422.
殷志琦, 巢剑非, 张雷红, 等. 构树化学成分研究. 天然产物研究与开发, 2006, 18(3): 420-422.
[20] Si B W, Tao H, Zhang X, et al. Effect of Broussonetia papyrifera L. (paper mulberry) silage on dry matter intake, milk composition, antioxidant capacity and milk fatty acid profile in dairy cows. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 2018, 31(8): 1259-1266.
[21] Polat M, Özelcam Y S H. Estimating in situ effective crude protein degradability with cornell net carbohydrate and protein system parameters in energy-rich feedstuffs for ruminants. Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 2014, 20(2): 259-265.
[22] Li H Y.Nutritional estimation of corn stover and its application as substrate for fermentation feed. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2014.
李红宇. 玉米秸秆营养价值评定及其发酵饲料的研究. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2014.
[23] Tu Y, Diao Q Y, Tian L, et al. Study on the rumen degradability of hybridized Broussonetia papyrifera Linn. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2009, 45(11): 38-41.
屠焰, 刁其玉, 田莉, 等. 杂交构树营养成分瘤胃降解特点的研究. 中国畜牧杂志, 2009, 45(11): 38-41.
[24] Mao J H, Tao L, Xu G S, et al. Biological fermentation mechanism and nutritional value evaluation of crop straw. Feed Industry, 2017, 38(21): 14-18.
毛建红, 陶莲, 许贵善, 等. 农作物秸秆生物发酵机理与饲养价值评定. 饲料工业, 2017, 38(21): 14-18.
[25] Lu Q H, Lu J, Ji X, et al. Screening of 3 ligin-degrading strains and study on their degradation of papermulberry (Broussonetia papyrifera). Plant Diseases and Pests, 2011, 39(5): 55-58.
卢庆华, 卢俊, 季祥, 等. 3种木质素降解菌的筛选及对构树降解研究. 植物病虫害研究, 2011, 39(5): 55-58.
[26] Sun J P, Dong K H.Comparison of the ruminal degradation characteristics of different varieties of alfalfa. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(6): 1323-1330.
孙建平, 董宽虎. 不同紫花苜蓿品种瘤胃降解特性比较. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1323-1330.
[27] Baba Y, Yu M, Mori Y, et al. Pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass by cattle rumen fluid for methane production: Bacterial flora and enzyme activity analysis. Journal of Bioscience & Bioengineering, 2017, 123(4): 489-496.
[28] Xu H, Li X.Effects of lignin on rumen degradability of rough fibers and advances in methods to improve rumen degradability of lignin. China Dairy Cattle, 2017, 324(4): 1-4.
许浩, 李翔. 木质素对粗纤维瘤胃降解率的影响及提高木质素瘤胃降解率方法的研究进展. 中国奶牛, 2017, 324(4): 1-4.
[29] Cao S Y.The degradation characteristics of common feeds of beef cattle and the influence of diet type on rumen fermentation. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015.
曹善勇. 肉牛常用饲料瘤胃降解特性及日粮类型对瘤胃发酵影响的研究. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015.
[30] Chen Y, Zhang X M, Wang Z S, et al. Ruminal degradation characteristics and small intestinal digestibility of rumen undegraded protein of six kinds of commonly used roughages for steers. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2014, 26(8): 2145-2154.
陈艳, 张晓明, 王之盛, 等. 6种肉牛常用粗饲料瘤胃降解特性和瘤胃非降解蛋白质的小肠消化率. 动物营养学报, 2014, 26(8): 2145-2154.
[31] Taghizadeh A, Mesgaran M D, Valizadeh R, et al. Digestion of feed amino acids in the rumen and intestine of steers measured using a mobile nylon bag technique. Journal of Dairy Science, 2005, 88(5): 1807-1814.
[32] Sutter F, Beever D E.Energy and nitrogen metabolism in Holstein—Friesian cows during early lactation. Animal Science, 2016, 70(3): 503-514.
[33] Vinitchaikul P, Rahman M M, Panthee A, et al. Effects of replacing soybean meal with urea and negative energy balance on ruminal fermentation characteristics, kinetics of plasma glucose and urea in sheep. Research Opinions in Animal & Veterinary Sciences, 2015, 5(6): 247-255.