欢迎访问《草业学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

草业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (12): 76-84.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2021475

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

应用AMMI模型和GGE双标图评价裸燕麦品种在华北高寒区的适应性

王星宇1(), 程静1, 高生1, 李默涵1, 杨满霞2, 葛军勇1(), 周海涛1, 李云霞1, 臧华栋3, 左文博1   

  1. 1.张家口市农业科学院,河北省高寒作物研究所,河北 张家口 075000
    2.张家口市经济技术开发区农业农村局,河北 张家口 075000
    3.中国农业大学,北京 100193
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-22 修回日期:2022-04-18 出版日期:2022-12-20 发布日期:2022-10-17
  • 通讯作者: 葛军勇
  • 作者简介:E-mail: gejunyong1987@163.com
    王星宇(1989-),男,河北万全人,助理研究员,硕士。E-mail: wxyfcy@yeah.net
  • 基金资助:
    国家燕麦荞麦产业技术体系项目(CARS-07);中央引导地方科技发展资金项目(206Z6302G);河北省现代农业产业技术体系杂粮杂豆创新团队(HBCT201807);张家口市重点研发计划(1911015C)

Evaluation of adaptability of naked oat varieties in the alpine region of North China based on the AMMI model and GGE Biplot

Xing-yu WANG1(), Jing CHENG1, Sheng GAO1, Mo-han LI1, Man-xia YANG2, Jun-yong GE1(), Hai-tao ZHOU1, Yun-xia LI1, Hua-dong ZANG3, Wen-bo ZUO1   

  1. 1.Zhangjiakou Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Hebei Alpine Crop Research Institute,Zhangjiakou 075000,China
    2.Agricultural and Rural Bureau of Zhangjiakou Economic-Technological Development Area,Zhangjiakou 075000,China
    3.China Agricultural University,Beijing 100193,China
  • Received:2021-12-22 Revised:2022-04-18 Online:2022-12-20 Published:2022-10-17
  • Contact: Jun-yong GE

摘要:

为全面地评价裸燕麦在华北高寒区的丰产性、稳产性和适应性以及试点的代表性和区分能力,本研究应用AMMI模型和GGE双标图对2019年6个参试品种和6个区试点进行了联合分析与综合评价。结果表明,同时采用AMMI模型和GGE双标图分析评价裸燕麦区域试验,结果更为准确,结论更为全面。影响裸燕麦籽粒产量的变异来源,即基因型、环境以及二者的交互作用均达到了极显著水平,200910-28-4-3(G2)是籽粒丰产稳产性均较好的品种,其次是200910-5-2(G3)和200910-22-1(G4)。从品种区域适应性试点选择来看,内蒙古乌兰察布试点既有很好的代表性又有较强的鉴别力,为最理想的试点,崇礼狮子沟原种场和张北基地作为试点也较为理想。本研究为华北高寒区裸燕麦品种的选育推广及试点布局提供了科学依据。

关键词: 裸燕麦, AMMI模型, GGE双标图, 品种适应性, 试点代表性

Abstract:

In order to comprehensively evaluate the productivity, stability and adaptability of varieties of naked oats, as well as the discriminative power and representativeness of testing sites in the alpine region of North China, data for six naked oat varieties and six testing sites in 2019 were analyzed and evaluated using the AMMI (additive main effects and multiplicative interaction) model and GGE (genotype main effect plus genotype-environment interaction) biplot. It was found that analyses of naked oats regional trial results using the two methods together reduced the statistical error and increased the ability to declare variety means significantly different, compared to traditional ANOVA methods. It was found that genotype, environment, and genotype×environment interaction effects all contributed to differences in grain yield. Variety 200910-28-4-3(G2) showed the best performance in both grain yield and stability of yield across sites, followed by varieties 200910-5-2 (G3) and 200910-22-1(G4). In terms of the selection of regional adaptability test sites for varieties, Ulanqab pilot in Inner Mongolia had both good representativeness and strong discriminability, and was the most ideal test site. Chongli Shizigou Seed Farm and Zhangbei Base were also comparatively good test sites. This study provided a scientific evaluation of methodology for performance testing of naked oat varieties in the alpine region of north China and the results basis will assist future breeding and promotion.

Key words: naked oats, AMMI model, GGE Biplot, variety adaptability, testing-site representativeness