紫花苜蓿种质耐盐性综合评价及盐胁迫下的生理反应

草业学报 ›› 2010, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (4): 79-86.

紫花苜蓿种质耐盐性综合评价及盐胁迫下的生理反应

李源^1,2,刘贵波²,高洪文^1*,孙桂枝¹,赵海明²,谢楠²

1.中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 北京 100193;
2.河北省农林科学院旱作农业研究所
河北省农作物抗旱研究重点实验室, 河北衡水 053000

收稿日期:2009-05-31 出版日期:2010-08-20 发布日期:2010-08-20
作者简介:李源(1981-),男,山西翼城人,硕士。E-mailgsly868@163.com
基金资助:
十一五国家科技支撑计划(2008BADB3B01,2007BAD56B02)资助。

A comprehensive evaluation of salt-tolerance and the physiological response of Medicago sativa at the seedling stage

LI Yuan^1,2, LIU Gui-bo², GAO Hong-wen¹, SUN Gui-zhi¹, ZHAO Hai-ming², XIE Nan²

1.Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing 100193, China;

2.Dryland Farming Institute, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences Key
Laboratory for Crop Drought Resistance of Hebei Province, Hengshui 053000, China

Received:2009-05-31 Online:2010-08-20 Published:2010-08-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以中苜1号为对照,对来自俄罗斯的18份紫花苜蓿种质的耐盐性进行了综合评价,并对盐胁迫下的生理反应进行了初步研究。结果表明,运用标准差系数赋予权重法进行综合评价,不但考虑了不同指标的权重,还定量的鉴定出了每份材料的耐盐能力,比聚类分析的结果更具科学合理性,试验共筛选出M7、M9、M15、810共4份耐盐性强的种质;在此基础上,进一步探讨了盐胁迫下的生理反应,除叶水势随着盐浓度的增加呈下降趋势外,游离脯氨酸含量、可溶性糖含量、细胞质膜透性、丙二醛含量、水分饱和亏缺则呈上升趋势,且不同材料变化幅度不同。可溶性糖含量、细胞质膜透性、丙二醛含量、水分饱和亏缺和叶水势等指标很好的反映了材料间的耐盐性,可直接作为耐盐评价的鉴定指标。

Abstract: A comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and the physiological response of 18 Medicago sativa. germplasms from Russia was studied under different NaCl concentrations (0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5% and 0.6%) in the green house at the seedling stage. They were compared with Zhongmu 1. The standard deviation coefficient allocation weighted method not only considered different indexes allocation weight, but also evaluated drought resistance of all the materials. Four strong salt tolerant germplasms, M7, M9, M15, and 810, were screened using this method. Free proline content, soluble sugar content, relative electrical conductivity, MDA content and water saturation deficit were considerably increased by an increase of salt concentration, while leaf water potential decreased. The soluble sugar content, relative electrical conductivity, MDA content, water saturation deficit and water potential in the leaf at the seedling stage responded sensitively to the level of salt stress and this can be used as an identification index of salt tolerance.

中图分类号:

李源,刘贵波,高洪文,孙桂枝,赵海明,谢楠. 紫花苜蓿种质耐盐性综合评价及盐胁迫下的生理反应[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(4): 79-86.

LI Yuan, LIU Gui-bo, GAO Hong-wen, SUN Gui-zhi, ZHAO Hai-ming, XIE Nan. A comprehensive evaluation of salt-tolerance and the physiological response of Medicago sativa at the seedling stage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(4): 79-86.

参考文献

[1] AL-khatib-M, Ncneilly T, Collins J C. The potential of selection and breeding for improved salt tolerance in lucerne[J]. Ephytica, 1993, 65: 43-51.
[2] 刘春华. 六十九个苜蓿品种耐盐性及其两个耐盐生理指标的研究[J]. 牧草与饲料, 1992, (4): 1-6.
[3] 耿华珠, 李聪, 李茂森. 苜蓿耐盐性鉴定初报[J]. 中国草地学报, 1990, 2: 67-69.
[4] 张远冰, 刘爱荣, 方蓉. 外源一氧化氮对镉胁迫下黑麦草生长和抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(4): 57-64.
[5] Hare P D, Cress W A, Van Staden J. Dissecting the roles of osmolyte accumulation during stress[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 1998, 21(6): 535-553.
[6] 张新虎, 何静, 沈惠敏. 苍耳提取物对番茄灰霉病菌的抑制作用及抑菌机理初探[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(6): 99-104.
[7] 桂枝, 高建明, 袁庆华. 6个紫花苜蓿品种的耐盐性研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2008, 23(1): 133-137.
[8] 张永峰, 殷波. 混合盐碱胁迫对苗期紫花苜蓿抗氧化酶活性及丙二醛含量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(1): 46-50.
[9] 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002.
[10] 张志良. 植物生理实验指导(第二版)[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1994: 12-14.
[11] 周广生, 梅方竹, 周竹青, 等. 小麦不同品种耐湿性生理指标综合评价及其预测[J]. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(11): 1378-1382.
[12] Haro R, Baneulos M A, Quintero F J, et al. Genetic basis of sodium tolerance in yeast: A medel for plants[J]. Physiolplant, 1993, 89: 868-874.
[13] 肖雯, 贾恢先, 蒲陆梅. 几种盐生植物抗盐生理指标的研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2000, (5): 818-825.
[14] 卢少石, 陈思萍, 陈思曼. 3种暖季型草坪草在干旱条件下脯氨酸含量变化和抗氧化酶活性的变化[J]. 园艺学报, 2003, 30(3): 303-306.
[15] 阮成江, 李代琼. 黄土丘陵区沙棘气孔导度及其影响因子[J]. 西北植物学报, 2001, 21(6): 1078-1084.
[16] 贾亚雄, 李向林, 袁庆华, 等. 披碱草属野生种质资源苗期耐盐性评价及相关生理机制研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(10): 2999-3007.
[17] 王玉祥, 张博, 王涛. 盐胁迫对苜蓿叶绿素、甜菜碱含量和细胞膜透性的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2009, 26(3): 53-56.
[18] 刘友良, 毛才良, 汪良驹. 植物耐盐性研究进展[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1987, (4): 1-7.
[19] 王萍. 碳酸钠胁迫下羊草幼苗的生理效应及外源脱落酸的缓解效应[J]. 草业学报, 1998, 7(1): 24-28.
[20] 刘华, 舒孝喜, 赵银, 等. 盐胁迫对碱茅生长及碳水化合物含量的影响[J]. 草业科学, 1997, 14(1): 18-19, 22.
[21] Sanada Y, Veda H, Kuribayashi K, et al. Novel light-dark change of proline levels in halophyte (Mesembryan-themum crystallinum L.) and glycophytes (Hordeum vulgare L. and Triticum aestivum L.) leaves and roots under salt stress[J]. Plant Cell Physiology, 1995, 36(6): 965-970.
[22] Poustini K, Siosemardeh A, Ranjbar M. Proline accumulation as a response to salt stress in 30 wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)cultivars differing in salt tolerance[J]. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2007, 54: 925-934.
[23] Petrusal M, Winicol L. Proline status in salt tolerant and salt sensitive alfalfa cell lines and plants in response to NaCl[J]. Plant Physiology Biochemistry, 1997, 35: 303-310.
[24] 易津, 王学敏, 谷安琳, 等. 驼绒藜属牧草种苗耐盐性评价及生理基础研究[J]. 草地学报, 2003, 11(2): 110-116.
[25] 侯建华, 云锦风, 张东晖. 羊草与灰色赖草及其杂交种的耐盐生理特性比较[J]. 草业学报, 2005, 14(1): 73-77.