全株青贮玉米对西门塔尔杂交牛生产性能、表观消化率及血液生化指标的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2017417

草业学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (9): 201-209.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2017417

• 研究简报 • 上一篇

全株青贮玉米对西门塔尔杂交牛生产性能、表观消化率及血液生化指标的影响

孙雪丽¹, 李秋凤^{1, *}, 刘英财², 曹玉凤¹, 王增林¹, 李艺¹, 赵洋洋¹, 葛瀚聪¹, 刘桃桃¹, 赵立新³

1.河北农业大学动物科技学院,河北保定 071000;
2.承德隆化县农牧局草原监理监测站,河北承德 068150;
3.隆化县益佳养殖有限公司,河北承德 068150

收稿日期:2017-10-09 修回日期:2018-02-01 出版日期:2018-09-20 发布日期:2018-09-20
通讯作者: E-mail: lqf582@126.com, cyf278@126.com
作者简介:孙雪丽(1992-),女,河北保定人,在读硕士。E-mail: xuelisunlq@163.com
基金资助:
国家现代农业(肉牛)产业技术体系(CARS-37),公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201503134)和河北省现代产业技术体系肉牛创新团队(HBCT2018130202)资助

Effects of whole-plant corn silage on performance, digestibility and blood biochemical parameters in Simmental crossbred bulls

SUN Xue-li¹, LI Qiu-feng^{1, *}, LIU Ying-cai², CAO Yu-feng¹, WANG Zeng-lin¹, LI Yi¹, ZHAO Yang-yang¹, GE Han-cong¹, LIU Tao-tao¹, ZHAO Li-xin³

1.College of Animal Science and Technology, Agricultural University of Hebei, Baoding 071000, China;
2.Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Bureau, Longhua Grassland Supervision Stations in Chengde, Chengde 068150, China;
3.Longhua Yijia Aquaculture Ltd, Chengde 068150, China

Received:2017-10-09 Revised:2018-02-01 Online:2018-09-20 Published:2018-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 选择体重350 kg左右健康的西门塔尔杂交公牛45头随机分为3组,分别饲喂3种不同日粮,其中试验Ⅰ组(精料+玉米秸秆黄贮)、试验Ⅱ组(精料+全株青贮玉米)和试验Ⅲ组(精料+添加剂全株青贮玉米),试验期140 d。结果表明,试验Ⅲ组的日增重极显著地高于试验Ⅰ组(P<0.01)和试验Ⅱ组(P<0.01),分别比试验Ⅰ组、试验Ⅱ组高出90.35%、24.00%。试验Ⅰ组干物质采食量极显著高于试验Ⅱ组(P<0.01)和Ⅲ组(P<0.01),试验Ⅱ组和试验Ⅲ组的干物质采食量无显著差异。试验Ⅲ组和试验Ⅱ组料重比极显著低于Ⅰ组(P<0.01)。试验Ⅲ组和试验Ⅱ组的粗蛋白的表观消化率显著高于试验Ⅰ组(P<0.05),试验Ⅲ组粗蛋白表观消化率极显著高于试验Ⅰ组(P<0.01);中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维的表观消化率Ⅲ组显著高于试验Ⅰ组(P<0.05)。肉牛血清中游离脂肪酸、瘦素的含量试验Ⅰ组显著高于Ⅱ组和Ⅲ组(P<0.05)。肉牛血清中胰岛素样生长因子Ⅰ浓度试验Ⅱ组、试验Ⅲ组显著高于Ⅰ组(P<0.05),试验Ⅱ组与试验Ⅲ组差异显著(P<0.05)。试验Ⅲ组的头均日收益比试验Ⅰ组、试验Ⅱ组分别高22.21和9.27元。综上所述,添加剂全株青贮玉米的育肥效果和经济效益最好。

关键词: 肉牛, 玉米秸秆黄贮, 全株青贮玉米, 血液生化指标, 表观消化率, 生长性能, 经济效益

Abstract: In this experiment, 45 healthy Simmental hybrid bulls weighing approximately 350 kg were randomly divided into three treatment groups that were fed different diets for a period of 140 d: GroupⅠ(concentrate +corn straw storage), Group Ⅱ (concentrate+whole-plant corn silage) and Group Ⅲ (concentrate+whole-plant corn silage+lactic acid bacteria compound preparation). The results showed that Group Ⅲ’s average daily gain was significantly higher than both Groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ (P<0.01). The daily gain of Group Ⅲ was 90.35% and 24.00% higher than Groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ respectively. The dry matter intake of Group Ⅰ was significantly higher than Groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ (P<0.01), while there were no significant differences between Groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ. The feed:gain ratio of Groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ were significantly lower than Group Ⅰ (P<0.01). The digestibility of crude protein (Measurement using the FOSS Automated Protein Analyzer (USA)[1])for Groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ was higher than Group Ⅰ (P<0.05), and especially so in the case of Group Ⅲ (P<0.01). The apparent digestibility of neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber in Group Ⅲ were significantly higher than Group Ⅰ (P<0.05). The content of free fatty acids and leptin in Group Ⅰ were significantly higher than Groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ (P<0.05).The levels of bovine insulin-like growth factor in Groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ were significantly higher than Group Ⅰ(P<0.05) and there was also a significant difference between Groups Ⅱ and Ⅲ (P<0.05). The average daily benefit of Group Ⅲ was 22.21 yuan and 9.27 yuan higher than that of Groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ respectively. In conclusion, this experiment showed that, in terms of fattening effects and economic benefits, cattle diets with additive whole corn silage outperformed the other two treatments studied.

Key words: beef cattle, corn stalk yellow storage, whole plant silage corn, blood biochemical index, apparent digestibility, growth performance, economic benefit

孙雪丽, 李秋凤, 刘英财, 曹玉凤, 王增林, 李艺, 赵洋洋, 葛瀚聪, 刘桃桃, 赵立新. 全株青贮玉米对西门塔尔杂交牛生产性能、表观消化率及血液生化指标的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(9): 201-209.

SUN Xue-li, LI Qiu-feng, LIU Ying-cai, CAO Yu-feng, WANG Zeng-lin, LI Yi, ZHAO Yang-yang, GE Han-cong, LIU Tao-tao, ZHAO Li-xin. Effects of whole-plant corn silage on performance, digestibility and blood biochemical parameters in Simmental crossbred bulls[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(9): 201-209.

参考文献

[1] Wang J, Wang J Q, Bu D P, et al. Research progress of international ruminant nutrition research from 2007 to 2008 VI. Development and utilization of roughage resources. Chinese Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2009, 36(3): 13-18.
王晶, 王加启, 卜登攀, 等. 2007-2008年国际反刍动物营养研究进展 Ⅵ.粗饲料资源开发与利用. 中国畜牧兽医, 2009, 36(3): 13-18.
[2] Yu Z.Pasture processing storage and utilization. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2004.
玉柱. 牧草加工贮藏与利用. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2004.
[3] Wang F S, Ma J X, Ren H W, et al. Role of microbial silage in corn stover yellow storage. Journal of Shandong University (Natural Science), 2004, (2): 112-115.
王富生, 马俊孝, 任红卫, 等. 微生物青贮剂在玉米秸秆黄贮中的作用. 山东大学学报(理学版), 2004, (2): 112-115.
[4] Lü W L, Diao Q Y, Yan G L.Effects of different additives on fermentation quality of corn stalk silage without heading. China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2010, 37(3): 22-26.
吕文龙, 刁其玉, 闫贵龙. 不同添加剂对不带穗玉米秸秆青贮发酵品质的影响. 中国畜牧兽医, 2010, 37(3): 22-26.
[5] Filya I.The effects of lactic acid bacterial inoculants on the fermentation, aerobic stability and in situ rumen degradability characteristics of maize and sorghum silages. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animalences, 2002, 26(4): 815-823.
[6] Xing L.Experimental study on the influence of lactic acid bacteria and cellulase preparations on quality of silage. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2005.
兴丽. 乳酸菌与纤维素酶制剂对不同青贮饲料质量影响的试验研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2005.
[7] Jr Kung L, Ranjit N K.The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and other additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of barley silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 2001, 84(5): 1149-1155.
[8] Yu Z, Sun Q Z, Yu Y D, et al. Effects of urea and lactic acid bacteria preparations on the quality of corn straw silage. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2009, 45(3): 37-40.
玉柱, 孙启忠, 于艳冬, 等. 添加尿素和乳酸菌制剂对玉米秸秆青贮料品质的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2009, 45(3): 37-40.
[9] C·X·EBTИCBA. Efficient utilization of corn silage. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Sciences, 1997, (2): 40.
C·X·EBTИCBA. 玉米青贮的高效利用. 草与畜杂志, 1997, (2): 40.
[10] Wu H M, Han R Y, Bao M L, et al. Experimental study on feeding cattle with quality whole silage corn. Journal of Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities (Natural Sciences Edition), 2014, 29(6): 671-672.
吴胡明, 韩润英, 包明亮, 等. 优质全株青贮玉米饲喂育肥牛试验研究报告. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 29(6): 671-672.
[11] Zhang LY.Feed analysis and feed quality inspection technology. 3rd edition. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2007.
张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 第3版. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007.
[12] Xue L P, Zheng A H, Ma P.Experiment on gaining weight of whole plant corn silage fed to beef cattle. China Cattle Science, 2013, 39(1): 18-20.
薛莉萍, 郑爱华, 马平. 全株玉米青贮饲料饲喂肉牛增重效果试验. 中国牛业科学, 2013, 39(1): 18-20.
[13] Su X X.Effects of different corn varieties on straw silage quality and palatability//Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Society of China Animal Nutrition Branch. Animal nutrition and feed research-The 5th national symposium on feed nutrition academic symposium. Beijing: China Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Society Animal Nutrition Branch, 2006: 1.
苏秀侠. 不同玉米品种对秸秆青贮饲料品质及适口性的影响//中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会. 动物营养与饲料研究——第五届全国饲料营养学术研讨会论文集. 北京: 中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会, 2006: 1.
[14] Wang J L, Yang R E, Gao Z P.Comparison of effects of different treatments of corn straw fattening beef cattle. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2008, (3): 320-323, 337.
王晋莉, 杨瑞娥, 高照平. 不同处理玉米秸育肥肉牛效果比较. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, (3): 320-323, 337.
[15] Xu X L.Contrastive experiments of feeding beef cattle with different crop processing methods. Gansu Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2015, 45(1): 41-42.
许向莉. 不同农作物处理方法饲喂肉牛效果对比试验. 甘肃畜牧兽医, 2015, 45(1): 41-42.
[16] Zhang S Z, Zhou Z M, Meng Q X.Effects of different biological additives on fermentation quality and digestibility of whole corn silage. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2007, (1): 53-56.
张淑枝, 周振明, 孟庆翔. 不同生物添加剂对于全株玉米青贮发酵品质及消化率的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2007, (1): 53-56.
[17] Su X X.A comparative study on the effects and economic benefits of finishing beef cattle and straw with three harvesting and processing methods//21st century prairie scientific outlook-proceedings of the international grass industry (Grass) conference. Beijing: China Association of Agricultural Science Societies, Chinese Grassland Society, 2001: 5.
苏秀侠. 三种收获与处理方式的玉米及其秸秆肥育肉牛效果与经济效益对比研究//21世纪草业科学展望——国际草业(草地)学术大会论文集. 北京: 中国农学会,中国草原学会, 2001: 5.
[18] Sun W, Ma W J, Song E L, et al. Effects of different levels of heat-treated soybean on the levels of insulin-like growth factor-I, growth hormone, insulin, and leptin in beef cattle tissue and serum. Herbivorous Livestock, 2011, (2): 35-39.
孙伟, 马文健, 宋恩亮, 等. 饲喂不同水平热处理大豆对肉牛体组织和血清中类胰岛素生长因子-Ⅰ、生长激素、胰岛素和瘦素水平的影响. 草食家畜, 2011, (2): 35-39.
[19] Kang R.Effects of different dietary patterns on performance, blood biochemical parameters and lactation-related hormones in mid-lactating dairy cows. Huhhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2014.
康蓉. 不同日粮模式对泌乳中期奶牛生产性能、血液生化指标及泌乳相关激素的影响. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2014.
[20] Saleh J, Sniderman A D, Cianflone K.Regulation of plasma fatty acid metabolism. Clinica Chimica Acta, 1999, 286(1): 163-180.
[21] Lee R G.Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a study of 49 patients. Human Pathology, 1989, 20(6): 594-598.
[22] Zhou S W.Animal biochemistry experiment guide. 2nd edition. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2002.
周顺伍. 动物生物化学实验指导. 第2版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2002.
[23] Sun F L.Effects of different corn silage and concentrate formulas on milk yield, milk composition and blood parameters of dairy cows//China national bull science conference and China animal husbandry and veterinary society proceedings of the sixth national congress of member representatives. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine Bull Breeding, 2005: 7.
孙凤莉. 不同玉米青贮及精料配方对奶牛泌乳量、乳成分及血液指标的影响//全国养牛科学研讨会暨中国畜牧兽医学会养牛学分会第六届会员代表大会论文集. 北京: 中国畜牧兽医学会养牛学分会, 2005: 7.
[24] Bin S Y, Yin Y L, Huang R L, et al. Effects of dietary starch source on protein synthesis rate in weaned piglets. Journal of Nuclear Agriculture, 2006, (6): 535-538.
宾石玉, 印遇龙, 黄瑞林, 等. 日粮淀粉来源对断奶仔猪内脏器官蛋白质合成率的影响. 核农学报, 2006, (6): 535-538.
[25] Zhang H F, Yang L, Qin J H, et al. Effect of weaning age on blood physiological indexes of piglets. Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2002, (2): 37-41.
张宏福, 杨琳, 秦加华, 等. 断奶日龄对仔猪血液生理指标的影响. 动物营养学报, 2002, (2): 37-41.
[26] Tang C M, Wang Z S, Wan J H, et al. Effects of cassava dreg diet on performance and blood biochemical parameters of fattening cattle in summer. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2011, 47(21): 38-40.
唐春梅, 王之盛, 万江虹, 等. 木薯渣日粮在夏季对育肥牛生产性能和血液生化指标的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2011, 47(21): 38-40.

全株青贮玉米对西门塔尔杂交牛生产性能、表观消化率及血液生化指标的影响

Effects of whole-plant corn silage on performance, digestibility and blood biochemical parameters in Simmental crossbred bulls

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	吴勇, 刘晓静, 蔺芳, 童长春. 河西荒漠灌区紫花苜蓿施肥效应及其基于数据包络分析法的经济效益研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 94-105.
[2]	钱志豪, 韩丙芳, 刘自婷, 蔡伟, 伏兵哲, 马红彬. 渗灌对宁夏引黄灌区苜蓿生长性状及水分利用率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 147-156.
[3]	孔凡林, 刁其玉, 渠建江, 屠焰. 构树在肉牛瘤胃中降解特性的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 179-189.
[4]	赵娟娟, 张伟涛, 郭伟婷, 孙新胜, 王超, 赵寿培, 车大璐, 高玉红. 饮水温度对冬季育肥羊生产性能、血液理化指标及瘤胃显微结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 57-66.
[5]	占今舜, 霍俊宏, 胡耀, 钟小军, 武艳平. 不同精粗比全混合日粮对努比亚山羊肉品质、血清指标和器官发育的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(10): 139-148.
[6]	张霞, 李妙善, 周恩光, 王虎成. 西北地区4种优质饲草的肉牛体外瘤胃发酵性能研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 135-145.
[7]	刘永嘉, 王聪, 刘强, 郭刚, 霍文婕, 张静, 裴彩霞, 张延利. 日粮补充异丁酸对犊牛生长性能、瘤胃发酵和纤维分解菌菌群的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(7): 151-158.
[8]	苗建军, 彭忠利, 高彦华, 郭春华, 王鼎, 付洋洋. 青稞替代玉米对育肥牦牛生产性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(1): 95-107.
[9]	康婧鹏, 王文基, 郭亚敏, 景小平, 仲崇亮, 郭伟, 龙瑞军, 周建伟. 不同能量水平低氮饲粮对藏羊表观消化率、氮代谢和生长性能的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(9): 166-174.
[10]	任春燕, 毕研亮, 杜汉昌, 于博, 屠焰, 郭艳丽, 刁其玉. 开食料中不同NDF水平对犊牛生长性能、瘤胃内环境及血清生化指标的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(5): 210-218.
[11]	李欢欢, 史莹华, 张晓霞, 刘晓, 贾泽统, 王成章. 不同亚麻酸水平及饲料组成对育肥猪生长性能和肉品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(3): 98-107.
[12]	姜辉, 雷赵民, 焦婷, 刘婷, 王建福, 李冲, 唐德富, 张建强. 日粮中添加牛至油对河西绒山羊育肥性能的影响研究[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(11): 142-149.
[13]	许承琪, 徐海鹏, 金少红, 舒朝成, 郭正刚. 藏南农牧交错带农牧互作模式下土地利用效益耦合度分析[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(10): 194-203.
[14]	李雪莉, 王超, 虞徳夫, 丁立人, 朱伟云, 杭苏琴. 微生态制剂对断奶仔猪生长性能、器官重及其胃肠道发育的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(8): 192-199.
[15]	李江文, 李治国, 蒋立宏, 靳宇曦, 王舒新, 韩梦琪, 于丰源, 韩国栋. 呼伦贝尔短尾羊产前补饲精喂对家畜个体特征及生产效益的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(7): 90-97.