苜蓿叶片氮、磷和钾养分重吸收与化学计量比的偶联关系

doi:10.11686/cyxb2018750

草业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 177-183.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018750

苜蓿叶片氮、磷和钾养分重吸收与化学计量比的偶联关系

王振南^1,*, 赵梅², 杨燕³, 李富宽¹, 王慧¹, 吕慎金^1,*

1.临沂大学农林科学学院,山东临沂 276000;
2.山东省产品质量检验研究院,山东济南 250100;
3.临沂市农业科学院,山东临沂 276012

收稿日期:2018-11-27 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2019-11-20
通讯作者: *. E-mail: wangzn11@163.com, lvshenjin@lyu.edu.cn
作者简介:王振南(1988-),男,山东临沂人,讲师,博士。E-mail: wangzn11@163.com
基金资助:
山东省现代农业产业技术体系牧草创新团队(SDAIT-23-10),山东省现代农业产业技术体系羊创新团队(SDAIT-10-14),临沂大学博士科研启动基金(LYDX2016BS099)和山东省2018年度农业重大应用技术创新项目“种养结合一体化生态循环养殖模式研究与示范”资助

Relationships between alfalfa leaf nutrient resorption and stoichiometric ratios of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium

WANG Zhen-nan^1,*, ZHAO Mei², YANG Yan³, LI Fu-kuan¹, WANG Hui¹, LÜ Shen-jin^1,*

1.College of Agriculture and Forestry Science, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China;
2.Shandong Product Quality Inspection Research Institute, Jinan 250100, China;
3.Linyi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Linyi 276012, China

Received:2018-11-27 Online:2019-11-20 Published:2019-11-20
Contact: *. E-mail: wangzn11@163.com, lvshenjin@lyu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 苜蓿作为一种优良的豆科牧草,具有较强的环境适应性。叶片养分重吸收是提高养分利用效率及增强环境适应性的重要机制之一,其直接影响了苜蓿的养分浓度,进而影响苜蓿元素的化学计量比。目前已有针对苜蓿养分重吸收及生态化学计量特征的研究,但关于苜蓿元素养分重吸收与生态化学计量比之间的偶联关系的研究还鲜有报道。为解释该偶联关系,以7个苜蓿品种作为研究对象,测定了成熟叶片和衰老叶片C、N、P、K元素浓度,分析了养分重吸收特征(包括养分重吸收率、养分重吸收度)及生态化学计量特征,进而分析了两者之间的偶联关系。结果表明,7个苜蓿品种的平均氮重吸收效率(NRE)、磷重吸收效率(PRE)和钾重吸收效率(KRE)分别为42.7%、42.4%和52.1%,分别低于全球陆生植物的NRE、PRE和KRE(分别为62.1%、64.9%和70.1%)。根据养分重吸收特征及生态化学计量比,判断苜蓿受土壤P含量影响最严重。叶片养分重吸收效率基本与衰老叶化学计量比呈正相关关系,而与成熟叶化学计量比呈负相关关系。由此可见,叶片养分重吸收与叶片生态化学计量比存在偶联关系,但受叶片成熟或衰老显著影响。

关键词: 品种, 生态化学计量学, 苜蓿, 养分重吸收

Abstract: Alfalfa is an excellent legume with strong environmental adaptability. Leaf nutrient resorption is an important mechanism to improve nutrient use efficiency and enhance environmental adaptability. It directly affects the nutrient concentration, and consequently, the stoichiometric ratio of elements in alfalfa. Many studies have focused on the nutrient resorption and ecological stoichiometric characteristics of alfalfa, but few have focused on the relationship between nutrient resorption and stoichiometric ratios. To explore this relationship, we measured the concentrations of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the mature and senescent leaves of seven alfalfa cultivars. Then, the characters and the relationships between resorption (including resorption efficiency and resorption proficiency) and stoichiometry were analyzed. It was found that the average nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium resorption efficiencies of alfalfa were 42.7%, 42.4%, and 52.1%, respectively, lower than those of global terrestrial plants (62.1%, 64.9%, and 70.1%, respectively). On the basis of the relationship between nutrient resorption and stoichiometric ratios, we concluded that the growth of alfalfa stands was limited by phosphorus in our study region. The leaf resorption efficiencies were positively correlated with the stoichiometric ratios in senescent leaves, but the opposite conditions were detected in the mature leaves. Thus, there is a close link between nutrient resorption and stoichiometric ratios, and this relationship is significantly affected by the growth status of the leaf (mature vs. senescent).

Key words: variety, ecological stoichiometry, alfalfa, nutrient resorption

王振南, 赵梅, 杨燕, 李富宽, 王慧, 吕慎金. 苜蓿叶片氮、磷和钾养分重吸收与化学计量比的偶联关系[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(11): 177-183.

WANG Zhen-nan, ZHAO Mei, YANG Yan, LI Fu-kuan, WANG Hui, LÜ Shen-jin. Relationships between alfalfa leaf nutrient resorption and stoichiometric ratios of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(11): 177-183.

参考文献

[1] Killingbeck K T.Nutrients in senesced leaves: Keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology, 1996, 77(6): 1716-1727.
[2] Blanco J A, Imbert J B, Castillo F J.Thinning affects nutrient resorption and nutrient-use efficiency in two Pinus sylvestris stands in the Pyrenees. Ecological Applications, 2009, 19: 682-698.
[3] Lü X T, Freschet G T, Flynn D F B, et al. Plasticity in leaf and stem nutrient resorption proficiency potentially reinforces plant-soil feedbacks and microscale heterogeneity in a semi-arid grassland. Journal of Ecology, 2012, 100: 144-150.
[4] Reed S C, Townsend A R, Davidson E A, et al. Stoichiometric patterns in foliar nutrient resorption across multiple scales. New Phytologist, 2012, 196(1): 173-180.
[5] Kobe R K, Lepczyk C A, Iyer M.Resorption efficiency decreases with increasing green leaf nutrients in a global data set. Ecology, 2005, 86: 2780-2792.
[6] Huang J, Wang X, Yan E.Leaf nutrient concentration, nutrient resorption and litter decomposition in an evergreen broad-leaved forest in eastern China. Forest Ecology and Management, 2007, 239: 150-158.
[7] Wang Z N, Lu J Y, Yang H M, et al. Resorption of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium from leaves of lucerne stands of different ages. Plant and Soil, 2014, 383: 301-312.
[8] Sterner R W, Elser J J.Ecological stoichiometry: The biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.
[9] Li W R, Zhang S Q, Shan L.Effect of water stress on characteristics of root water uptake and photosynthesis in alfalfa seedlings. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2007, 15(3): 206-211.
李文娆, 张岁岐, 山仑. 水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿根系吸水与光合特性的影响. 草地学报, 2007, 15(3): 206-211.
[10] Han R H, Lu X S, Gao G J, et al. Photosynthetic physiological response of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) to drought stress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(12): 5229-5237.
韩瑞宏, 卢欣石, 高桂娟, 等. 紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)对干旱胁迫的光合生理响应. 生态学报, 2007, 27(12): 5229-5237.
[11] Erice G, Louahlia S, Irigoyen J J, et al. Biomass partitioning, morphology and water status of four alfalfa genotypes submitted to progressive drought and subsequent recovery. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2010, 167(2): 114-120.
[12] Wang D M, Yang H M.Carbon and nitrogen stoichiometry at different growth stages in legumes and grasses. Pratacultural Science, 2011, 28(6): 921-925.
王冬梅, 杨惠敏. 4种牧草不同生长期C、N生态化学计量特征. 草业科学, 2011, 28(6): 921-925.
[13] Wang Z N, Lu J Y, Yang M, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus in leaves of differently aged lucerne (Medicago sativa) stands. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015, 6: 1062.
[14] Duan B H, Lu J Y, Liu M G, et al. Relationships between biological nitrogen fixation and leaf resorption of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in the rain-fed region of eastern Gansu, China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(12): 76-83.
段兵红, 陆姣云, 刘敏国, 等. 陇东雨养农区紫花苜蓿叶片氮、磷、钾重吸收与生物固氮的偶联关系. 草业学报, 2016, 25(12): 76-83.
[15] Zeng B.Forage production experiment. Chongqing: Southwest Normal University Press, 2013.
曾兵. 饲草生产学实验. 重庆: 西南师范大学出版社, 2013.
[16] Li Z Y, Zhang Q X, Tong Z Y, et al. Analysis of morphological and physiological responses to low Pi stress in different alfalfas. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(20): 3898-3907.
栗振义, 张绮芯, 仝宗永, 等. 不同紫花苜蓿品种对低磷环境的形态与生理响应分析. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(20): 3898-3907.
[17] Vergutz L, Manzoni S, Porporato A, et al. Global resorption efficiencies and concentrations of carbon and nutrients in leaves of terrestrial plants. Ecological Monographs, 2012, 82(2): 205-220.
[18] Veneklaas E J, Lambers H, Bragg J, et al. Opportunities for improving phosphorus-use efficiency in crop plants. New Phytologist, 2012, 195: 306-320.
[19] Guo Z W, Chen S L, Yang Q P, et al. Effects of stand desity on Oligostachyum lubricum leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry and nutrient resorption. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2013, 24(4): 893-899.
郭子武, 陈双林, 杨清平, 等. 密度对四季竹叶片C、N、P化学计量和养分重吸收特征的影响. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(4): 893-899.
[20] Koerselman W, Meuleman A F M. The vegetation N∶P ratio: A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 33: 1441-1450.
[21] Olde V H, Wassen M J, Verkroost W M, et al. Species richness-productivity patterns differ between N-, P-, and K-limited wetlands. Ecology, 2003, 84(8): 2191-2199.
[22] Wei D P, Zhang J, Zhang D J, et al. Leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus resorption and the stoichiometry in Pinus massoniana plantations with various canopy densities. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2017, 23(3): 560-569.
魏大平, 张健, 张丹桔, 等. 不同林冠郁闭度马尾松(Pinus massoniana)叶片养分再吸收率及其化学计量特征. 应用与环境生物学报, 2017, 23(3): 560-569.
[23] Deng H J, Chen A M, Yan S W, et al. Nutrient resorption efficiency and C∶N∶P stoichiometry in different ages of Leucaena Leucocephala. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2015, 21(3): 522-527.
邓浩俊, 陈爱民, 严思维, 等. 不同林龄新银合欢重吸收率及其C∶N∶P化学计量特征. 应用与环境生物学报, 2015, 21(3): 522-527.

苜蓿叶片氮、磷和钾养分重吸收与化学计量比的偶联关系

Relationships between alfalfa leaf nutrient resorption and stoichiometric ratios of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	吴勇, 刘晓静, 蔺芳, 童长春. 河西荒漠灌区紫花苜蓿施肥效应及其基于数据包络分析法的经济效益研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 94-105.
[2]	邢易梅, 蕫理, 战力峰, 才华, 杨圣秋, 孙娜. 混合接种摩西球囊霉和根瘤菌对紫花苜蓿耐碱能力的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 136-145.
[3]	覃凤飞, 李志华, 刘信宝, 渠晖, 平措卓玛, 洛松群措, 苏梦涵. 外源2,4表油菜素内酯对越夏期高温与弱光胁迫下紫花苜蓿生长和光合性能的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 146-160.
[4]	童长春, 刘晓静, 蔺芳, 于铁峰. 基于平衡施肥的紫花苜蓿光合特性及光合因子的产量效应研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 70-80.
[5]	陆姣云, 熊军波, 张鹤山, 田宏, 杨惠敏, 刘洋. 水分胁迫对紫花苜蓿产量、品质和微量元素的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 126-133.
[6]	才璐, 王林林, 罗珠珠, 李玲玲, 牛伊宁, 蔡立群, 谢军红. 中国苜蓿产量及水分利用效率对种植年限响应的Meta分析[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 27-38.
[7]	张梨梨, 史敏, 李彦忠. 炭疽病对沙尔沁地区苜蓿产量和品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 117-126.
[8]	何国兴, 宋建超, 温雅洁, 刘彩婷, 祁娟. 不同根瘤菌肥对紫花苜蓿生产力及土壤肥力的综合影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(5): 109-120.
[9]	刘文文, 崔会婷, 尉春雪, 龙瑞才, 康俊梅, 杨青川, 王珍. 蒺藜苜蓿叶绿素酸酯a加氧酶(MtCAO)基因的克隆与功能分析[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(5): 171-181.
[10]	张玉霞, 王显国, 田永雷, 丛百明, 王月林, 陈卫东, 高凯. 科尔沁沙地播种时期对不同紫花苜蓿品种抗寒性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 73-80.
[11]	董文成, 林语梵, 朱鸿福, 张欢, 张桂杰. 不同品种葡萄渣对苜蓿青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 129-137.
[12]	于浩然, 格根图, 王志军, 贾玉山, 连植, 贾鹏飞. 甲酸添加剂及青贮时间对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 89-95.
[13]	马亚玲, 刘辉, 刘阳, 李春杰. 两种色型豌豆蚜生物学特征对不同大豆品种的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 96-102.
[14]	高丽敏, 苏晶, 田倩, 沈益新. 施氮对不同水分条件下紫花苜蓿氮素吸收及根系固氮酶活性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 130-136.
[15]	钱志豪, 韩丙芳, 刘自婷, 蔡伟, 伏兵哲, 马红彬. 渗灌对宁夏引黄灌区苜蓿生长性状及水分利用率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 147-156.