Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (9): 76-85.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020396
Previous Articles Next Articles
Chuan-qi WANG1(), Wen-hui LIU1, Yong-chao ZHANG1, Qing-ping ZHOU1,2()
Received:
2020-08-24
Revised:
2020-10-26
Online:
2021-08-30
Published:
2021-08-30
Contact:
Qing-ping ZHOU
Chuan-qi WANG, Wen-hui LIU, Yong-chao ZHANG, Qing-ping ZHOU. Drought tolerance of wild Elymus nutans during germination and seedling establishment[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(9): 76-85.
指标 Index | 环境水势Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
发芽率Germination percentage (%) | 100.00±0.00a | 91.00±3.00a | 80.00±5.00ab | 70.00±4.00ab | 58.00±4.00b | 42.00±5.00b |
出苗率Emergence percentage (%) | 100.00±0.00a | 91.00±2.00a | 79.00±1.00a | 67.00±2.00a | 41.00±3.00b | 33.00±2.00b |
发芽指数Germination index | 90.82±1.54a | 72.91±2.05ab | 58.47±2.67b | 48.82±1.33bc | 36.57±0.75c | 30.07±0.39c |
活力指数Vigor index | 1246.05±2.59a | 993.76±3.67ab | 700.47±4.42b | 504.80±3.95b | 331.69±2.16c | 220.12±1.97d |
Table 1 Effects of drought stress on seed germination and emergence
指标 Index | 环境水势Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
发芽率Germination percentage (%) | 100.00±0.00a | 91.00±3.00a | 80.00±5.00ab | 70.00±4.00ab | 58.00±4.00b | 42.00±5.00b |
出苗率Emergence percentage (%) | 100.00±0.00a | 91.00±2.00a | 79.00±1.00a | 67.00±2.00a | 41.00±3.00b | 33.00±2.00b |
发芽指数Germination index | 90.82±1.54a | 72.91±2.05ab | 58.47±2.67b | 48.82±1.33bc | 36.57±0.75c | 30.07±0.39c |
活力指数Vigor index | 1246.05±2.59a | 993.76±3.67ab | 700.47±4.42b | 504.80±3.95b | 331.69±2.16c | 220.12±1.97d |
指标 Index | 环境水势Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
发芽率Germination percentage (%) | 0.00±0.00d | 6.00±0.15c | 11.00±1.75b | 18.00±2.25a | 14.00±1.25ab | 14.00±0.75ab |
出苗率Emergence percentage (%) | 0.00±0.00d | 6.00±0.10c | 11.00±0.65b | 18.00±1.55a | 14.00±0.85ab | 14.00±0.35ab |
发芽指数Germination index | 0.00±0.00d | 8.08±0.49c | 13.55±0.78b | 24.69±0.93a | 16.61±0.62ab | 16.50±0.57ab |
活力指数Vigor index | 0.00±0.00d | 105.77±1.17c | 183.60±1.34b | 304.67±1.49a | 204.97±1.03ab | 180.35±0.82b |
Table 2 Effects of rewatering after drought stress on seed germination and emergence
指标 Index | 环境水势Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
发芽率Germination percentage (%) | 0.00±0.00d | 6.00±0.15c | 11.00±1.75b | 18.00±2.25a | 14.00±1.25ab | 14.00±0.75ab |
出苗率Emergence percentage (%) | 0.00±0.00d | 6.00±0.10c | 11.00±0.65b | 18.00±1.55a | 14.00±0.85ab | 14.00±0.35ab |
发芽指数Germination index | 0.00±0.00d | 8.08±0.49c | 13.55±0.78b | 24.69±0.93a | 16.61±0.62ab | 16.50±0.57ab |
活力指数Vigor index | 0.00±0.00d | 105.77±1.17c | 183.60±1.34b | 304.67±1.49a | 204.97±1.03ab | 180.35±0.82b |
指标 Index | 环境水势 Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
根长Root length (cm) | 6.80±0.23a | 7.39±0.31a | 6.62±0.19a | 6.07±0.35a | 5.79±0.47a | 5.11±0.26a |
芽长Bud length (cm) | 6.92±0.39a | 6.25±0.27a | 5.36±0.24a | 4.24±0.41ab | 3.28±0.50b | 2.26±0.33b |
根芽比Root/bud | 0.98±0.14b | 1.18±0.17b | 1.22±0.23b | 1.43±0.20b | 1.77±0.26ab | 2.26±0.21a |
Table 3 Effects of drought stress on root length and bud length of E. nutans seedlings
指标 Index | 环境水势 Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
根长Root length (cm) | 6.80±0.23a | 7.39±0.31a | 6.62±0.19a | 6.07±0.35a | 5.79±0.47a | 5.11±0.26a |
芽长Bud length (cm) | 6.92±0.39a | 6.25±0.27a | 5.36±0.24a | 4.24±0.41ab | 3.28±0.50b | 2.26±0.33b |
根芽比Root/bud | 0.98±0.14b | 1.18±0.17b | 1.22±0.23b | 1.43±0.20b | 1.77±0.26ab | 2.26±0.21a |
指标 Index | 环境水势Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
根 (鲜重) Root fresh weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.1323a | 0.1467a | 0.1264a | 0.1093ab | 0.0971ab | 0.0744b |
芽 (鲜重) Bud fresh weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.2459a | 0.2338ab | 0.2169ab | 0.1794ab | 0.1635b | 0.1463b |
根 (干重) Root dry weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0207a | 0.0256a | 0.0194a | 0.0139ab | 0.0107b | 0.0048c |
芽 (干重) Bud dry weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0333a | 0.0293ab | 0.0262ab | 0.0201b | 0.0183b | 0.0154b |
干物质积累率Dry matter accumulation percentage (%) | 0.14±0.01a | 0.14±0.02a | 0.13±0.01ab | 0.11±0.04ab | 0.10±0.01b | 0.09±0.00b |
Table 4 Effects of drought stress on fresh and dry weight of E. nutans seedlings
指标 Index | 环境水势Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
根 (鲜重) Root fresh weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.1323a | 0.1467a | 0.1264a | 0.1093ab | 0.0971ab | 0.0744b |
芽 (鲜重) Bud fresh weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.2459a | 0.2338ab | 0.2169ab | 0.1794ab | 0.1635b | 0.1463b |
根 (干重) Root dry weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0207a | 0.0256a | 0.0194a | 0.0139ab | 0.0107b | 0.0048c |
芽 (干重) Bud dry weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0333a | 0.0293ab | 0.0262ab | 0.0201b | 0.0183b | 0.0154b |
干物质积累率Dry matter accumulation percentage (%) | 0.14±0.01a | 0.14±0.02a | 0.13±0.01ab | 0.11±0.04ab | 0.10±0.01b | 0.09±0.00b |
指标 Index | 环境水势Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
根长Root length (cm) | 0.00±0.00b | 6.98±0.66a | 6.77±0.59a | 6.54±0.47a | 6.25±0.51a | 5.94±0.41a |
芽长Bud length (cm) | 0.00±0.00b | 8.32±0.79a | 8.04±1.02a | 7.69±1.21a | 7.54±1.33a | 7.39±0.92a |
根芽比Root/bud | 0.00±0.00b | 0.84±0.01a | 0.84±0.02a | 0.85±0.01a | 0.83±0.01a | 0.82±0.03a |
Table 5 Effects of rewatering after drought stress on root length and bud length of E. nutans seedlings
指标 Index | 环境水势Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
根长Root length (cm) | 0.00±0.00b | 6.98±0.66a | 6.77±0.59a | 6.54±0.47a | 6.25±0.51a | 5.94±0.41a |
芽长Bud length (cm) | 0.00±0.00b | 8.32±0.79a | 8.04±1.02a | 7.69±1.21a | 7.54±1.33a | 7.39±0.92a |
根芽比Root/bud | 0.00±0.00b | 0.84±0.01a | 0.84±0.02a | 0.85±0.01a | 0.83±0.01a | 0.82±0.03a |
指标 Index | 环境水势Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
根 (鲜重) Root fresh weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0000b | 0.1392a | 0.1336a | 0.1278a | 0.1195a | 0.1170a |
芽 (鲜重) Bud fresh weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0000c | 0.3144a | 0.3114ab | 0.2079b | 0.2056b | 0.2035b |
根 (干重) Root dry weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0000c | 0.0251a | 0.0224ab | 0.0196ab | 0.0163b | 0.0124b |
芽 (干重) Bud dry weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0000b | 0.0394a | 0.0371a | 0.0359a | 0.0347a | 0.0333a |
干物质积累率Dry matter accumulation percentage (%) | 0.00±0.00b | 0.14±0.01a | 0.14±0.02a | 0.14±0.01a | 0.14±0.02a | 0.14±0.03a |
Table 6 Effects of rewatering after drought stress on dry and fresh weight of E. nutans seedlings
指标 Index | 环境水势Environmental water potential | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | -0.15 MPa | -0.30 MPa | -0.50 MPa | -0.75 MPa | -1.00 MPa | |
根 (鲜重) Root fresh weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0000b | 0.1392a | 0.1336a | 0.1278a | 0.1195a | 0.1170a |
芽 (鲜重) Bud fresh weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0000c | 0.3144a | 0.3114ab | 0.2079b | 0.2056b | 0.2035b |
根 (干重) Root dry weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0000c | 0.0251a | 0.0224ab | 0.0196ab | 0.0163b | 0.0124b |
芽 (干重) Bud dry weight (g·10 plant-1) | 0.0000b | 0.0394a | 0.0371a | 0.0359a | 0.0347a | 0.0333a |
干物质积累率Dry matter accumulation percentage (%) | 0.00±0.00b | 0.14±0.01a | 0.14±0.02a | 0.14±0.01a | 0.14±0.02a | 0.14±0.03a |
环境水势 Environmental water potential | 拟合方程 Fitting equation | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient (r) | 发芽时间 Germination time (h) |
---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | 0.97 | 76.95 | |
-0.15 MPa | 0.95 | 93.31 | |
-0.30 MPa | 0.96 | 114.77 | |
-0.50 MPa | 0.96 | 136.45 | |
-0.75 MPa | 0.88 | 164.76 | |
-1.00 MPa | 0.88 | 236.12 |
Table 7 Relationship between water absorption time and germination percentage of 50% seeds population
环境水势 Environmental water potential | 拟合方程 Fitting equation | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient (r) | 发芽时间 Germination time (h) |
---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | 0.97 | 76.95 | |
-0.15 MPa | 0.95 | 93.31 | |
-0.30 MPa | 0.96 | 114.77 | |
-0.50 MPa | 0.96 | 136.45 | |
-0.75 MPa | 0.88 | 164.76 | |
-1.00 MPa | 0.88 | 236.12 |
材料Material | 拟合方程Fitting equation | 相关系数Correlation coefficient (r) | 临界水势Critical water potential (MPa) |
---|---|---|---|
垂穗披碱草E. nutans | 1/t=0.0153ψw+0.0130 | 0.85 | -0.85 |
Table 8 Relationship between germination time and water potential of 50% seeds population
材料Material | 拟合方程Fitting equation | 相关系数Correlation coefficient (r) | 临界水势Critical water potential (MPa) |
---|---|---|---|
垂穗披碱草E. nutans | 1/t=0.0153ψw+0.0130 | 0.85 | -0.85 |
环境水势 Environmental water potential | 拟合方程 Fitting equation | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient (r) | 发芽时间 Emergence time (h) |
---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | 0.97 | 78.96 | |
-0.15 MPa | 0.95 | 103.84 | |
-0.30 MPa | 0.96 | 117.05 | |
-0.50 MPa | 0.96 | 144.39 | |
-0.75 MPa | 0.88 | 208.66 | |
-1.00 MPa | 0.88 | 277.09 |
Table 9 Relationship between water absorption time and emergence percentage of 50% seeds population
环境水势 Environmental water potential | 拟合方程 Fitting equation | 相关系数 Correlation coefficient (r) | 发芽时间 Emergence time (h) |
---|---|---|---|
0 MPa | 0.97 | 78.96 | |
-0.15 MPa | 0.95 | 103.84 | |
-0.30 MPa | 0.96 | 117.05 | |
-0.50 MPa | 0.96 | 144.39 | |
-0.75 MPa | 0.88 | 208.66 | |
-1.00 MPa | 0.88 | 277.09 |
材料Material | 拟合方程Fitting equation | 相关系数Correlation coefficient (r) | 临界水势Critical water potential (MPa) |
---|---|---|---|
垂穗披碱草E. nutans | 1/t=0.0207ψw+0.0127 | 0.90 | -0.61 |
Table 10 Relationship between emergence time and water potential of 50% seeds population
材料Material | 拟合方程Fitting equation | 相关系数Correlation coefficient (r) | 临界水势Critical water potential (MPa) |
---|---|---|---|
垂穗披碱草E. nutans | 1/t=0.0207ψw+0.0127 | 0.90 | -0.61 |
1 | Xi Z Y, Chen J T, Li W H. Crop breeding. Beijing: Science Press, 2014. |
席章营, 陈景堂, 李卫华. 作物育种学. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014. | |
2 | Zhou H K, Yao B Q, Yu L. Degraded succession and ecological restoration of alpine grassland in Three-River Headwaters region. Beijing: Science Press, 2016. |
周华坤, 姚步青, 于龙. 三江源区高寒草地退化演替与生态恢复. 北京: 科学出版社, 2016. | |
3 | Chen J. Identification of ecological and environmental issues based on scientific study on Three-River-Source region. China Water Resources, 2017(17): 31-32, 44. |
陈进. 基于科学考察的三江源生态环境问题辨识. 中国水利, 2017(17): 31-32, 44. | |
4 | Jiang C, Gao Y N, Li F, et al. Soil erosion status variation and attribution in the Three-River Headwaters Region during 1956-2010. Research of Environmental Sciences, 2017, 30(1): 20-29. |
蒋冲, 高艳妮, 李芬, 等. 1956-2010年三江源区水土流失状况演变. 环境科学研究, 2017, 30(1): 20-29. | |
5 | Yang H Z, Li H M, Zhang A L. Herdsmen’s perception about ecological degeneration of grasslands in the Three-river Source Region, China. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(4): 822-829. |
杨海镇, 李惠梅, 张安录. 牧户对三江源草地生态退化的感知. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(4): 822-829. | |
6 | Feng B F, Zhao X Q, Dong Q M, et al. The effect of feed supplementing and processing on the live weight gain of Tibetan sheep during the cold season on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 2013, 12(3): 312-315. |
7 | Michel B E, Kaufmann M R. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant Physiology, 1973, 51(5): 914-916. |
8 | Zhou Z Q, He Q H. Geographic variation of seed dormancy and germination of Rosa soulieana in the dry valleys of the Hengduan Mountain Region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(17): 6037-6045. |
周志琼, 何其华. 横断山区干旱河谷川滇蔷薇种子休眠与萌发的地理空间差异. 生态学报, 2020, 40(17): 6037-6045. | |
9 | Wang C Q, Liang S, Zhang W J, et al. Effect of temperature and water on seed germination of Leymus secalinus. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(6): 1459-1464. |
王传旗, 梁莎, 张文静, 等. 温度和水分对赖草种子萌发的影响. 草业科学, 2018, 35(6): 1459-1464. | |
10 | Boscagli A, Sette B. Seed gemination enhancement in Satureja montana L. ssp. montana. Seed Science and Technology, 2001, 29(2): 347-355. |
11 | Wang C Q, Xu Y M, Liang S, et al. Germination responses of Elymus sibiricus seed to temperature and moisture. Crops, 2017(6): 165-169. |
王传旗, 徐雅梅, 梁莎, 等. 西藏野生老芒麦种子萌发对温度和水分的响应. 作物杂志, 2017(6): 165-169. | |
12 | Yi J N, Wang K C, Zhang Q Q, et al. Effects of drought stress on growth and quality of Perilla frutescen. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34(6): 1320-1326. |
易家宁, 王康才, 张琪绮, 等. 干旱胁迫对紫苏生长及品质的影响. 核农学报, 2020, 34(6): 1320-1326. | |
13 | Mo H D. Agricultural experiment statistics. Shanghai: Shanghai Scientific & Technical Publishers, 1984: 442-446. |
莫惠栋. 农业试验统计. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1984: 442-446. | |
14 | Scott S J, Jones R A, Williams W A. Review of data analysis methods for seed germination. Crop Science, 1984, 24(6): 1192-1199. |
15 | Xu P P, Wang J Z. Drought resistance of three common slope plants determined in a simulated drought experiment. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(2): 36-47. |
许翩翩, 王建柱. 三种常见边坡植物对模拟干旱环境抗旱性能的研究. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2): 36-47. | |
16 | Zeng Y J, Wang Y R, Baskin C C, et al. Testing seed germination responses to water and salinity stresses to gain insight on suitable miorohabitats for restoration of cold desert shrubs. Journal of Arid Environments, 2014, 101: 89-92. |
17 | Wang C Q, Zhang W J, Deji Z M, et al. Responses to water and salt stress on seed germination of Elymus nutans in Nagarzê county,Tibet. Seed, 2018, 37(7): 39-43. |
王传旗, 张文静, 德吉卓玛, 等.西藏浪卡子县野生垂穗披碱草种子萌发对水盐胁迫的响应. 种子, 2018, 37(7): 39-43. | |
18 | Zhou J, Wang C Q, Baosai H N, et al. Physiological response to temperature and moisture of wild Elymus nutans Griseb. in Tibet, China. Seed, 2019, 38(8): 65-69. |
周晶, 王传旗, 包赛很那, 等. 西藏野生垂穗披碱草对温度和水分的生理响应. 种子, 2019, 38(8): 65-69. | |
19 | Gorai M, Aloui W E, Yang X, et al. Toward understanding the ecological role of mucilage in seed germination of a desert shrub Henophyton deserti: Interactive effects of temperature, salinity and osmotic stress. Plant and Soil, 2014, 374(1): 727-738. |
20 | Baskin C C, Baskin J M. Seeds: Ecology, biogeography, and evolution of dormancy and germination. Crop Science, 2014, 40(2): 564-565. |
21 | Yan X F, Zhou L B, Si B B, et al. Stress effects of simulated drought by polyethylene glycol on the germination of Caragana korshinskii Kom. seeds under different temperature conditions. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(7): 1989-1996. |
闫兴富, 周立彪, 思彬彬, 等. 不同温度下PEG-6000模拟干旱对柠条锦鸡儿种子萌发的胁迫效应. 生态学报, 2016, 36(7): 1989-1996. | |
22 | Shan L. Discussion on excavating plant drought-resistant and water-saving potential: The relationship between scientific thought and practice. Journal of Henan University (Natural Science), 2012, 42(5): 588-592. |
山仑. 挖掘植物自身抗旱节水潜力的探讨——兼论科学思路与实践的关系. 河南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 42(5): 588-592. | |
23 | Owen P C. The relation of germination of wheat to water potential. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1952(3): 188-203. |
24 | Hadas A. Water uptake and germination of leguniinous seeds under changing extrenal water potential in osmotic solutions. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1976(27): 480-489. |
25 | Li W R, Zhang S Q, Shan L. Seeds germination characteristics and drought-tolerance of alfalfa and sorghum seeding under water stress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(6): 3066-3074. |
李文娆, 张岁岐, 山仑. 水分胁迫下紫花苜蓿和高粱种子萌发特性及幼苗耐旱性. 生态学报, 2009, 29(6): 3066-3074. | |
26 | Zhu J J, Li Z H, Kang H Z, et al. Effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-simulated drought stress on Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica seed germination on sandy land. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(5): 801-804. |
朱教君, 李智辉, 康宏樟, 等. 聚乙二醇模拟水分胁迫对沙地樟子松种子萌发影响研究. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(5): 801-804. |
[1] | Zhen-lian FAN, Yang-jie JIA, Yuan FAN, Hui-ping SONG, Zheng-jun FENG. Growth of Elymus nutans in saline saline-alkali soil amended with calcium silicate slag: Performance and mechanism [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(2): 93-101. |
[2] | XU Hong-yu, LI Xiang-lin. A metabolomics analysis of the effect of water deficit on the freezing tolerance of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(1): 106-116. |
[3] | WU Ting-mei, WU Yuan, WANG Duo-bin, LIN Hui-long. Influence of herders’ livelihood capital on livelihood strategies in the Three-River Headwaters region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(11): 12-21. |
[4] | CAO Wei, LIU Lu-lu, WU Dan. Soil erosion changes and driving factors in the Three-River Headwaters region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(6): 10-22. |
[5] | LIU Ting-ting, CHEN Dao-qian, WANG Shi-wen, YIN Li-na, DENG Xi-ping. Physio-ecological responses to drought and subsequent re-watering in sorghum seedlings [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(6): 100-110. |
[6] | HUANG Cai-bian,ZENG Fan-jiang,LEI Jia-qiang. Comparison of drought resistance among three Calligonum in the Southern Fringe of the Taklamakan Desert [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(3): 136-143. |
[7] | ZHANG Jin-zheng,ZHANG Qi-yuan,SUN Guo-feng,HE Qing,LI Xiao-dong,LIU Hong-zhang. Effects of drought stress and re-watering on growth and photosynthesis of Hosta [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(1): 167-176. |
[8] | LI Zhou,PENG Yan,SU Xing-yuan. Physiological responses of white clover by different leaf types associated with anti-oxidative enzyme protection and osmotic adjustment under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(2): 257-263. |
[9] | ZHAO Yu-yu, HUANG De-jun, MAO Zhu-xin, NIE Bin, FU Hua. A study on forage nutritional quality of Elymus nutans from different populations in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(1): 38-45. |
[10] | ZHANG Miao-qing, ZHANG Ji-yu, LIU Zhi-peng, WANG Yan-rong, ZHANG Lei. Cloning and analysis of the MADS-box gene WM8 of Elymus nutans [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(4): 141-150. |
[11] | DU Run-feng, HAO Wen-fang, WANG Long-fei. Dynamic responses on anti-oxidative defense system and lipid peroxidation of Lespedeza davurica to drought stress and re-watering [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(2): 51-61. |
[12] | GUO Yan-jun, GUO Yun-jiang, TANG Hua, LI Zhi-yan, HAN Long. Effect of soil water deficit and enhanced ultraviolet radiation on contents and crystal structure of cuticular waxes in alfalfa (Medicago sativa) leaf [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(6): 77-84. |
[13] | ZHANG Miao-qing, WANG Yan-rong, ZHANG Ji-yu, LIU Zhi-peng, ZHANG Lei, NIE Bin, ZHOU Jing. A study on genetic diversity of reproductive characters in Elymus nutans germplasm resources [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(3): 182-191. |
[14] | DU Jian-xiong, HOU Xiang-yang, LIU Jin-rong. A study on physiological response to drought and re-watering treatments in Kentucky bluegrass [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(2): 31-38. |
[15] |
XIE Guo-ping, HU Tian-ming, WANG Quan-zhen, MIAO Yan-jun, Bianbadroma, ZHU Yong, XIONG Xiao-rui. A study on the impact of nitrogen application and harvest time on theseed yield of Tibetan wild Elymus nutans in Lhasa valley, Tibet [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(2): 89-96. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||