Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (11): 188-198.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2023003
Ya TAO1,3(), Li-jun XU2, Feng LI1, Wen-long LI1, Qi-zhong SUN1, Chang XU1, Ke-jian LIN1()
Received:
2023-01-04
Revised:
2023-03-20
Online:
2023-11-20
Published:
2023-09-27
Contact:
Ke-jian LIN
Ya TAO, Li-jun XU, Feng LI, Wen-long LI, Qi-zhong SUN, Chang XU, Ke-jian LIN. The Leymus chinensis industry in China needs to be urgently revitalized[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(11): 188-198.
年份 Year | 总饲草保留面积 Total forage area | 多年生饲草保留面积 Perennial forage area | 一年生饲草种植面积Annual grass area |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1196.34 | 761.43 | 434.91 |
2017 | 1209.77 | 763.14 | 446.63 |
2018 | 1091.93 | 637.37 | 454.61 |
2019 | 889.56 | 491.05 | 405.18 |
2020 | 894.77 | 491.88 | 402.89 |
Table 1 Cultivation area of forage in 2016-2022 (×104 hm2)
年份 Year | 总饲草保留面积 Total forage area | 多年生饲草保留面积 Perennial forage area | 一年生饲草种植面积Annual grass area |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1196.34 | 761.43 | 434.91 |
2017 | 1209.77 | 763.14 | 446.63 |
2018 | 1091.93 | 637.37 | 454.61 |
2019 | 889.56 | 491.05 | 405.18 |
2020 | 894.77 | 491.88 | 402.89 |
年份 Year | 保留面积 Total forage area (×104 hm2) | 干草总产量 Total hay output (×104 t) | 青贮量 Silage (×104 t) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 437.47 | 3025.7 | 162.9 |
2017 | 415.01 | 2933.6 | 163.4 |
2018 | 307.73 | 2251.0 | 159.7 |
2019 | 231.48 | 1694.0 | 405.2 |
2020 | 220.67 | 1665.3 | 178.1 |
Table 2 Alfalfa production in 2016-2020
年份 Year | 保留面积 Total forage area (×104 hm2) | 干草总产量 Total hay output (×104 t) | 青贮量 Silage (×104 t) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 437.47 | 3025.7 | 162.9 |
2017 | 415.01 | 2933.6 | 163.4 |
2018 | 307.73 | 2251.0 | 159.7 |
2019 | 231.48 | 1694.0 | 405.2 |
2020 | 220.67 | 1665.3 | 178.1 |
年份 Year | 饲草 Forage | 苜蓿 Alfalfa | 燕麦 Oat |
---|---|---|---|
2014 | 100.49 | 88.40 | 12.10 |
2015 | 136.50 | 121.00 | 15.15 |
2016 | 168.60 | 138.78 | 22.30 |
2017 | 181.83 | 140.00 | 31.00 |
2018 | 171.00 | 138.37 | 29.36 |
2019 | 159.74 | 135.60 | 24.09 |
2020 | 172.22 | 135.00 | 33.47 |
2021 | 199.25 | 178.03 | 21.22 |
Table 3 Forage import volume (×104 t)
年份 Year | 饲草 Forage | 苜蓿 Alfalfa | 燕麦 Oat |
---|---|---|---|
2014 | 100.49 | 88.40 | 12.10 |
2015 | 136.50 | 121.00 | 15.15 |
2016 | 168.60 | 138.78 | 22.30 |
2017 | 181.83 | 140.00 | 31.00 |
2018 | 171.00 | 138.37 | 29.36 |
2019 | 159.74 | 135.60 | 24.09 |
2020 | 172.22 | 135.00 | 33.47 |
2021 | 199.25 | 178.03 | 21.22 |
年份 Year | 饲草生产 Forage production (×104 hm2) | 种子生产Seed production | |
---|---|---|---|
面积Area (×104 hm2) | 产量 Production (t) | ||
2012[ | 36.2 | 0.289 | 418.8 |
2013[ | 25.7 | 0.208 | 339.4 |
2014[ | 28.0 | 0.236 | 757.9 |
2015[ | 25.4 | 0.405 | 718.0 |
2016[ | 15.5 | 0.406 | 748.0 |
2017[ | 9.0 | 0.276 | 478.2 |
2018[ | 8.4 | 0.063 | 212.0 |
2019[ | 11.0 | 0.221 | 386.0 |
2020[ | 18.7 | 0.205 | 370.2 |
Table 4 L. chinensis production in 2012-2020
年份 Year | 饲草生产 Forage production (×104 hm2) | 种子生产Seed production | |
---|---|---|---|
面积Area (×104 hm2) | 产量 Production (t) | ||
2012[ | 36.2 | 0.289 | 418.8 |
2013[ | 25.7 | 0.208 | 339.4 |
2014[ | 28.0 | 0.236 | 757.9 |
2015[ | 25.4 | 0.405 | 718.0 |
2016[ | 15.5 | 0.406 | 748.0 |
2017[ | 9.0 | 0.276 | 478.2 |
2018[ | 8.4 | 0.063 | 212.0 |
2019[ | 11.0 | 0.221 | 386.0 |
2020[ | 18.7 | 0.205 | 370.2 |
品种 Variety | 物候期 Phonological stage | 干物质 Dry matter | 粗蛋白 Crude protein | 粗脂肪 Ether extract | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber | 灰分 Ash | 磷 Phosphorus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
农牧1号羊草 L. chinensis cv. Nongmu No.1 | 孕穗期Booting stage | 88.96 | 13.56 | 3.20 | 65.38 | 33.66 | 8.01 | 0.54 |
抽穗期Heading stage | 91.20 | 9.36 | 2.23 | 66.77 | 34.69 | 6.96 | 0.67 | |
开花期Flowering stage | 92.01 | 7.58 | 2.37 | 62.05 | 32.82 | 7.28 | 0.55 |
Table 5 Nutritional components of L. chinensis at different cutting times (%)[20]
品种 Variety | 物候期 Phonological stage | 干物质 Dry matter | 粗蛋白 Crude protein | 粗脂肪 Ether extract | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber | 灰分 Ash | 磷 Phosphorus |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
农牧1号羊草 L. chinensis cv. Nongmu No.1 | 孕穗期Booting stage | 88.96 | 13.56 | 3.20 | 65.38 | 33.66 | 8.01 | 0.54 |
抽穗期Heading stage | 91.20 | 9.36 | 2.23 | 66.77 | 34.69 | 6.96 | 0.67 | |
开花期Flowering stage | 92.01 | 7.58 | 2.37 | 62.05 | 32.82 | 7.28 | 0.55 |
品种 Variety | 粗蛋白 Crude protein | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber | 灰分 Ash |
---|---|---|---|---|
燕王Forage plus | 9.35 | 59.00 | 34.33 | 8.40 |
牧王Haymaker | 8.63 | 57.73 | 32.60 | 7.90 |
枪手Gunners | 9.21 | 57.20 | 33.87 | 8.00 |
太阳神Helios | 8.89 | 59.90 | 35.83 | 8.00 |
爱沃256 Everleaf No.256 | 9.47 | 56.73 | 34.70 | 9.50 |
贝勒2 Baler No.2 | 8.38 | 56.17 | 32.43 | 8.63 |
Table 6 Comparison of the nutritional composition of the forage oat varieties[21] (%)
品种 Variety | 粗蛋白 Crude protein | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber | 灰分 Ash |
---|---|---|---|---|
燕王Forage plus | 9.35 | 59.00 | 34.33 | 8.40 |
牧王Haymaker | 8.63 | 57.73 | 32.60 | 7.90 |
枪手Gunners | 9.21 | 57.20 | 33.87 | 8.00 |
太阳神Helios | 8.89 | 59.90 | 35.83 | 8.00 |
爱沃256 Everleaf No.256 | 9.47 | 56.73 | 34.70 | 9.50 |
贝勒2 Baler No.2 | 8.38 | 56.17 | 32.43 | 8.63 |
特性 Characteristic | 性状表现 Performance | 参考文献 References |
---|---|---|
生长Growth | 多年生,可长期生长利用。Perennial, capable of long-term growth and utilization. | [ |
分布Distribution | 广域性旱中生牧草,东北、内蒙古、华北及西北各地皆有分布。Xeric-mesophytic forage, widely distributed in Inner Mongolia, northeast, north and northwest China. | [ |
生态型Ecotype | 深绿色:抽穗率高,茎叶比低。Dark green: High heading rate, low stem-leaf ratio. | [ |
黄绿色:分蘖强,抽穗率、茎叶比居中。Yellow-green: Strong tillering, middle heading rate and stem-leaf ratio. | [ | |
灰绿色:抽穗率低,茎叶比高,具有较强的耐盐碱性。Grey green: Low heading rate, high stem-leaf ratio, and strong salt and alkaline tolerance. | [ | |
繁殖Reproduction | 以无性繁殖为主,有性繁殖为辅。Asexual reproduction is predominant and sexual reproduction is supplemented. | [ |
根茎Rhizome | 既有垂直根,又具地下横向根茎。It has both vertical roots and underground rhizomes. | [ |
侵占性Aggressiveness | 根茎强韧伸长,繁殖力也强,根冠硬质,能穿透极硬质的黏土及沙壤土,向四面八方蜿蜒引伸(伸长),所以竞争力强。The rhizome is strong and elongated, with strong fertility. The root crown is hard and can penetrate very hard clay and sandy loam, and stretches in all directions, resulting in strong competitiveness. | [ |
再生性Reproducibility | 再生性较好,在一般管理条件下,一年可刈割2~3次。Reproducibility is good, can cut 2-3 times a year under general management conditions. | [ |
耐寒Cold- resistance | 耐寒性强,根茎外被纤维叶鞘所包裹增加了耐寒性,在冬季-42 ℃无雪覆盖条件下可安全越冬,幼苗可耐-5~-6 ℃的低温。Cold resistance is strong, which is enhanced by the wrapping of fibrous leaf sheaths outside the rhizomes. It can safely overwinter under the conditions of -42 ℃ with no snow cover in winter, and the seedlings can withstand low temperature of -5--6 ℃. | [ |
耐旱Drought- resistance | 耐旱性强,在年降水量300 mm的干旱地区生长良好,降水量500~600 mm地区生长最好。由于根茎发达,能从土壤深处吸收水分和养分,所以抗旱性极强。Drought resistance is strong. It grows well in arid areas with an annual precipitation of 300 mm, and grows best in areas with precipitation of 500-600 mm. Due to with well-developed rhizomes, it can absorb water and nutrients from deep in the soil, making it highly resistant to drought. | [ |
耐盐碱Salt and alkali resistance | 羊草耐生于碱地,因而得名碱草,为碱草草地的优势种或建群种,适宜的土壤pH为5.5~8.5,其中以pH 7.0~8.0最适宜。L. chinensis is known as alkaline grass, because it is tolerant to alkaline soil. It is the dominant species or constructive species of alkaline grassland. The suitable soil pH is 5.5-8.5, among which pH 7.0-8.0 is the most suitable. | [ |
耐瘠薄Barren- resistance | 无论平川山坡,凡高燥瘠薄的沙壤土中,都能适应生长。No matter the plain or hillside, where the dry and barren sandy loam, can adapt to growth. | [ |
抗风沙Wind and sand resistance | 由于根茎深埋于地下,植株固定性好,不易被风刮走或刮死,更不怕沙埋。Due to the deep burial of the rhizomes underground, the plants have good fixation and are not easily blown away or killed by the wind, and are not afraid of sand burial. | [ |
耐践踏Trampling-resistance | 根茎芽深埋地下不易被破坏,植株坚韧耐践踏。The rhizome buds buried deep underground are not easy to be destroyed, and the plants are tough and durable. | [ |
Table 7 Ecological and biological characteristics of L.chinensis
特性 Characteristic | 性状表现 Performance | 参考文献 References |
---|---|---|
生长Growth | 多年生,可长期生长利用。Perennial, capable of long-term growth and utilization. | [ |
分布Distribution | 广域性旱中生牧草,东北、内蒙古、华北及西北各地皆有分布。Xeric-mesophytic forage, widely distributed in Inner Mongolia, northeast, north and northwest China. | [ |
生态型Ecotype | 深绿色:抽穗率高,茎叶比低。Dark green: High heading rate, low stem-leaf ratio. | [ |
黄绿色:分蘖强,抽穗率、茎叶比居中。Yellow-green: Strong tillering, middle heading rate and stem-leaf ratio. | [ | |
灰绿色:抽穗率低,茎叶比高,具有较强的耐盐碱性。Grey green: Low heading rate, high stem-leaf ratio, and strong salt and alkaline tolerance. | [ | |
繁殖Reproduction | 以无性繁殖为主,有性繁殖为辅。Asexual reproduction is predominant and sexual reproduction is supplemented. | [ |
根茎Rhizome | 既有垂直根,又具地下横向根茎。It has both vertical roots and underground rhizomes. | [ |
侵占性Aggressiveness | 根茎强韧伸长,繁殖力也强,根冠硬质,能穿透极硬质的黏土及沙壤土,向四面八方蜿蜒引伸(伸长),所以竞争力强。The rhizome is strong and elongated, with strong fertility. The root crown is hard and can penetrate very hard clay and sandy loam, and stretches in all directions, resulting in strong competitiveness. | [ |
再生性Reproducibility | 再生性较好,在一般管理条件下,一年可刈割2~3次。Reproducibility is good, can cut 2-3 times a year under general management conditions. | [ |
耐寒Cold- resistance | 耐寒性强,根茎外被纤维叶鞘所包裹增加了耐寒性,在冬季-42 ℃无雪覆盖条件下可安全越冬,幼苗可耐-5~-6 ℃的低温。Cold resistance is strong, which is enhanced by the wrapping of fibrous leaf sheaths outside the rhizomes. It can safely overwinter under the conditions of -42 ℃ with no snow cover in winter, and the seedlings can withstand low temperature of -5--6 ℃. | [ |
耐旱Drought- resistance | 耐旱性强,在年降水量300 mm的干旱地区生长良好,降水量500~600 mm地区生长最好。由于根茎发达,能从土壤深处吸收水分和养分,所以抗旱性极强。Drought resistance is strong. It grows well in arid areas with an annual precipitation of 300 mm, and grows best in areas with precipitation of 500-600 mm. Due to with well-developed rhizomes, it can absorb water and nutrients from deep in the soil, making it highly resistant to drought. | [ |
耐盐碱Salt and alkali resistance | 羊草耐生于碱地,因而得名碱草,为碱草草地的优势种或建群种,适宜的土壤pH为5.5~8.5,其中以pH 7.0~8.0最适宜。L. chinensis is known as alkaline grass, because it is tolerant to alkaline soil. It is the dominant species or constructive species of alkaline grassland. The suitable soil pH is 5.5-8.5, among which pH 7.0-8.0 is the most suitable. | [ |
耐瘠薄Barren- resistance | 无论平川山坡,凡高燥瘠薄的沙壤土中,都能适应生长。No matter the plain or hillside, where the dry and barren sandy loam, can adapt to growth. | [ |
抗风沙Wind and sand resistance | 由于根茎深埋于地下,植株固定性好,不易被风刮走或刮死,更不怕沙埋。Due to the deep burial of the rhizomes underground, the plants have good fixation and are not easily blown away or killed by the wind, and are not afraid of sand burial. | [ |
耐践踏Trampling-resistance | 根茎芽深埋地下不易被破坏,植株坚韧耐践踏。The rhizome buds buried deep underground are not easy to be destroyed, and the plants are tough and durable. | [ |
项目 Item | 特性 Characteristics | 性状表现 Performance | 参考文献References |
---|---|---|---|
适宜栽培区域Suitable cultivation area | 旱作羊草:降水量≥350 mm 半干旱、半湿润及湿润区。Dry farming L. chinensis: Precipitation ≥350 mm semi-arid, semi-humid and humid areas. 北方具有灌溉条件的地区均可种植。Northern areas with irrigation conditions can be planted. | [ | |
适宜地型Suitable land type | 撂荒地、盐碱地、沙地、退耕地、坡耕地、下湿地。Abandoned land, saline-alkali land, sandy land, farming-withdrawn land, sloping land and soaking land. | [ | |
分蘖性Tillering | 根茎形成Rhizome formation | 5片叶后形成根茎,约出苗生长30 d。 After five leaves form rhizome, which grow for about 30 days after emergence. | [ |
分蘖期Tillering stage | 出苗生长55~65 d进入分蘖期。Seedling emergence and growth for 55-65 days enter the tillering stage. | [ | |
根茎分布Rhizome distribution | 地表下5~20 cm。5-20 cm below the surface. | [ | |
侵占性Aggressiveness | 扩展性Extensibility | 根茎扩展性极强,生长第二年成片几乎不见行。Rhizome expansibility is very strong, the second year of growth into pieces almost invisible line. | [ |
竞争性Competitiveness | 由于强大的根茎繁殖力,具有很强的竞争性,能使群落相对单一。Due to strong rhizomes reproduction, it has strong competitiveness and can keep the community relatively homogeneous. | [ | |
刈割性Mowing | 播种当年The sowing year | 早春播种,有灌溉时可刈割1~2次。Sowing in early spring, mowing 1-2 times when irrigation is available. | [ |
第二年后The second year and later | 有灌溉刈割2~3次。Mowing 2-3 times when irrigation is available. | [ | |
繁殖性Reproduction | 无性繁殖Asexual reproduction | 无性繁殖强,有性繁殖弱,无性繁殖成活率达90%。Asexual reproduction is strong, sexual reproduction is weak, and the survival rate of asexual reproduction reaches 90%. | [ |
开花期Flowering stage | 5月下旬至7月底,开花不集中。Flowering is not concentrated from late May to late July. | [ | |
结实率Seed setting rate | 45%~70% | [ | |
产籽性Seediness | 农牧1号羊草在呼和浩特为825~900 kg·hm-2,在蓝旗为525~600 kg·hm-2。The yield of Nongmu No. 1 L. chinensis is 825-900 kg·ha-1 in Hohhot, and 525-600 kg·ha-1 in Lanqi. | [ |
Table 8 Cultural biological characteristics of L. chinensis
项目 Item | 特性 Characteristics | 性状表现 Performance | 参考文献References |
---|---|---|---|
适宜栽培区域Suitable cultivation area | 旱作羊草:降水量≥350 mm 半干旱、半湿润及湿润区。Dry farming L. chinensis: Precipitation ≥350 mm semi-arid, semi-humid and humid areas. 北方具有灌溉条件的地区均可种植。Northern areas with irrigation conditions can be planted. | [ | |
适宜地型Suitable land type | 撂荒地、盐碱地、沙地、退耕地、坡耕地、下湿地。Abandoned land, saline-alkali land, sandy land, farming-withdrawn land, sloping land and soaking land. | [ | |
分蘖性Tillering | 根茎形成Rhizome formation | 5片叶后形成根茎,约出苗生长30 d。 After five leaves form rhizome, which grow for about 30 days after emergence. | [ |
分蘖期Tillering stage | 出苗生长55~65 d进入分蘖期。Seedling emergence and growth for 55-65 days enter the tillering stage. | [ | |
根茎分布Rhizome distribution | 地表下5~20 cm。5-20 cm below the surface. | [ | |
侵占性Aggressiveness | 扩展性Extensibility | 根茎扩展性极强,生长第二年成片几乎不见行。Rhizome expansibility is very strong, the second year of growth into pieces almost invisible line. | [ |
竞争性Competitiveness | 由于强大的根茎繁殖力,具有很强的竞争性,能使群落相对单一。Due to strong rhizomes reproduction, it has strong competitiveness and can keep the community relatively homogeneous. | [ | |
刈割性Mowing | 播种当年The sowing year | 早春播种,有灌溉时可刈割1~2次。Sowing in early spring, mowing 1-2 times when irrigation is available. | [ |
第二年后The second year and later | 有灌溉刈割2~3次。Mowing 2-3 times when irrigation is available. | [ | |
繁殖性Reproduction | 无性繁殖Asexual reproduction | 无性繁殖强,有性繁殖弱,无性繁殖成活率达90%。Asexual reproduction is strong, sexual reproduction is weak, and the survival rate of asexual reproduction reaches 90%. | [ |
开花期Flowering stage | 5月下旬至7月底,开花不集中。Flowering is not concentrated from late May to late July. | [ | |
结实率Seed setting rate | 45%~70% | [ | |
产籽性Seediness | 农牧1号羊草在呼和浩特为825~900 kg·hm-2,在蓝旗为525~600 kg·hm-2。The yield of Nongmu No. 1 L. chinensis is 825-900 kg·ha-1 in Hohhot, and 525-600 kg·ha-1 in Lanqi. | [ |
1 | Editorial Committee of the Flora of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Flora of China [Vol. 9(3)]. Beijing: Science Press, 1987: 19. |
中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志[第9(3)卷]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1987: 19. | |
2 | Hu X X, Sun X D. Domestic herbage plants. Beijing: Science Press, 1955: 30-31. |
胡先骕, 孙醒东. 国产牧草植物. 北京: 科学出版社, 1955: 30-31. | |
3 | Inner Mongolia Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College. Herbage and forage crop cultivation. Beijing: Agriculture Press, 1981: 162-166. |
内蒙古农牧学院. 牧草及饲料作物栽培学. 北京: 农业出版社, 1981: 162-166. | |
4 | Cui Y W. Important forage plants and toxic plants in north and northwest China. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1959: 42-45. |
崔友文. 中国北部和西北部重要饲料植物和毒害植物. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1959: 42-45. | |
5 | Tadato O, Yang L H. Japanese import of Leymus chinensis will lead to the destruction of grassland vegetation in Inner Mongolia. Foreign Zootechnics (Grassland and Turf), 1997(2): 47. |
大久保忠旦, 杨连合. 日本进口羊草将会导致内蒙古草原植被破坏.国外畜牧学(草原与牧草), 1997(2): 47. | |
6 | Cao B H. Overview of forage import trade in Japan. Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2001, 18(4): 62-64. |
曹兵海. 日本牧草进口贸易概况. 动物科学与动物医学, 2001, 18(4): 62-64. | |
7 | Ke P, Lou Y J, Cheng W G, et al. Study on feeding effect of Leymus chinensis on dairy cows. China Dairy Cattle, 2005(1): 30-32. |
克平, 娄玉杰, 成文革, 等. 吉生羊草饲喂奶牛效果的研究. 中国奶牛, 2005(1): 30-32. | |
8 | Zhang Y G, Wang Z B, Song P. Nutritive evaluation of common grass forage crop for dairy cattle in Heilongjiang. Pratacultural Science, 2006, 23(9): 64-69. |
张永根, 王志博, 宋平. 黑龙江省主要栽培的禾本科牧草对奶牛的营养价值评价. 草业科学, 2006, 23(9): 64-69. | |
9 | National Animal Husbandry Station. Statistics of Chinese pratacultural industry (2016). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2017: 19-21. |
全国畜牧总站. 中国草业统计(2016). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2017: 19-21. | |
10 | National Animal Husbandry Station. Statistics of Chinese pratacultural industry (2017). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2018: 11-13. |
全国畜牧总站. 中国草业统计(2017). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2018: 11-13. | |
11 | National Animal Husbandry Station. Statistics of Chinese pratacultural industry (2018). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2019: 7-8. |
全国畜牧总站. 中国草业统计(2018). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2019: 7-8. | |
12 | National Animal Husbandry Station. Statistics of Chinese pratacultural industry (2019). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2020: 7-8. |
全国畜牧总站. 中国草业统计(2019). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2020: 7-8. | |
13 | National Animal Husbandry Station. Statistics of Chinese pratacultural industry (2020). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2021: 13-15. |
全国畜牧总站. 中国草业统计(2020). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2021: 13-15. | |
14 | Sun Q Z, Yu Z, Ma C H, et al. Achievements of the alfalfa industry in last decade and priorities in next decade in China. Pratacultural Science, 2013, 7(3): 471-477. |
孙启忠, 玉柱, 马春晖, 等. 我国苜蓿产业过去10年发展成就与未来10年发展重点. 草业科学, 2013, 7(3): 471-477. | |
15 | Tao Y, Sun Q Z, Xu L J, et al. Trends and challenges of alfalfa industry in China. Grassland and Prataculture, 2022, 34(1): 1-10. |
陶雅, 孙启忠, 徐丽君, 等. 我国苜蓿产业发展态势与面临的挑战. 草原与草业, 2022, 34(1): 1-10. | |
16 | Gao F, Wang T M, Lu X S. Analysis of the production situation of commercial forage in China in 2021 and prospects for 2022. Animal Agriculture, 2022(3): 32-37. |
高菲, 王铁梅, 卢欣石. 2021年我国商品饲草生产形势分析与2022年趋势展望.畜牧产业, 2022(3): 32-37. | |
17 | Sun Q Z. Dry region clover. Beijing: Science Press, 2014. |
孙启忠. 旱区苜蓿. 北京: 科学出版社, 2014. | |
18 | Hong F Z. Division of perennial cultivated grass species in China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1989: 36-38. |
洪绂曾. 中国多年生栽培草种区划. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1989: 36-38. | |
19 | National Animal Husbandry Station. Statistics of Chinese pratacultural industry (2015). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2016: 44, 86, 108. |
全国畜牧总站. 中国草业统计(2015). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2016: 44, 86, 108. | |
20 | Ma H L, Yun J F, Wan T, et al. Biological characteristics and main economic traits of Leymus chinensis “Nongmu No. 1”. Grassland of China, 1992(2): 1-5. |
马鹤林, 云锦凤, 宛涛, 等. “农牧一号”羊草生物学特性及主要经济性状表现. 中国草地, 1992(2): 1-5. | |
21 | Na Y, Wu R C, Li F, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance of 15 oat varieties in south bank of Yellow River in western Inner Mongolia. Feed Research, 2022, 45(24): 97-101. |
那亚, 乌仁曹, 李峰, 等. 15个燕麦品种在内蒙古西部黄河南岸地区生产性能综合评价. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(24): 97-101. | |
22 | Li B. The basic types of zonal vegetation and its ecological geography in Inner Mongolia. Journal of Inner Mongolia University, 1962, 5(1): 41-74. |
李博. 内蒙古地带性植被的基本类型及其生态地理规律. 内蒙古大学学报, 1962, 5(1): 41-74. | |
23 | Wang D. Treatise on herbage science. Nanjing: Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Books Publishing House, 1956: 53-56. |
王栋. 牧草学各论. 南京: 畜牧兽医图书出版社, 1956: 53-56. | |
24 | Ma H L, Li H, Si Q. Morphological and physiological characteristics of several different types of Leymus chinensis. Inner Mongolia Prataculture, 1991(3): 24-29. |
马鹤林, 李红, 斯琴. 几种不同类型羊草的形态特征和生理特性. 内蒙古草业, 1991(3): 24-29. | |
25 | Chen B S. Herbage and forage crop cultivation. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2001: 314-317. |
陈宝书. 牧草饲料作物栽培学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001: 314-317. | |
26 | Hong F Z. Chinese perennial grass cultivation techniques. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1990: 38-44. |
洪绂曾. 中国多年生草种栽培技术. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1990: 38-44. | |
27 | Su J K. Excellent grass cultivation techniques. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1983: 52-57. |
苏加楷. 优良牧草栽培技术. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1983: 52-57. | |
28 | Ma H L. The collected works of Ma Helin. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 2010: 38-42. |
马鹤林. 马鹤林文集. 北京: 气象出版社, 2010: 38-42. | |
29 | Sun Q Z, Wan T. In view of Ma Helin’s research ideas, the research and innovation of Leymus chinensis vigorously should be carried out——To commemorate the 90th anniversary of the birth of Ma Helin. Grassland and Prataculture, 2022, 34(4): 1-3. |
孙启忠, 宛涛. 鉴于马鹤林先生的研究思路大力开展羊草研究再创新——纪念马鹤林先生诞辰90周年. 草原与草业, 2022, 34(4): 1-3. | |
30 | Wang P, Yin L J, Li J D. Study on stress of neutral salt and alkaline salt to Leymus chinensis seedlings. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 1994, 3(2): 37-43. |
王萍, 殷立娟, 李建东. 中性盐和碱性盐对羊草幼苗胁迫的研究. 草业学报, 1994, 3(2): 37-43. | |
31 | Zhang D M, Wang J L, You J, et al. Production technology of Leymus chinensis in soda saline-alkali land. Agriculture and Technology, 2022, 42(2): 106-109. |
张冬梅, 王建丽, 尤佳, 等. 苏打盐碱地羊草生产技术. 农业与技术, 2022, 42(2): 106-109. | |
32 | Wang D. Treatise on herbage science. Nanjing: Jiangsu Science and Technology Press, 1989: 39-41. |
王栋. 牧草学各论. 南京: 江苏科学技术出版社, 1989: 39-41. | |
33 | Ma H L, Wan T, Wang F G. The seed setting characteristics and reasons for low seed setting rate of Leymus chinensis. Grassland of China, 1984(3): 15-21, 81. |
马鹤林, 宛涛, 王风刚. 羊草结实特性及结实率低的原因. 中国草原, 1984(3): 15-21, 81. | |
34 | Wang M L. The seed setting characteristics of Leymus chinensis. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 1998(1): 18-20. |
王梦龙. 羊草结实特性的研究. 中国草地, 1998(1): 18-20. | |
35 | Su J K, Zhang W S. Guidance on the introduction of improved forage varieties. Beijing: Jindun Publishing House, 2007: 188-189. |
苏加楷, 张文淑. 牧草良种引种指导. 北京: 金盾出版社, 2007: 188-189. | |
36 | Feng H Z, Yang M Y, Cui Z F, et al. Observation on trial result of seeds introduction of Jishen Chinese wild-rye. Acta Ecologae Animalis Domastici, 2005, 26(6): 71-76. |
冯宏珠, 杨明耀, 崔志峰, 等. 吉生羊草引种试验效果观察. 家畜生态学报, 2005, 26(6): 71-76. | |
37 | Hou L Y, Mao P S. Analysis on the current situation of Chinese Leymus chinensis seed production and operation in northeast region//Proceedings of the Third China Prataculture Conference.Hohhot: China Animal Agriculture Association, 2014. |
侯龙鱼, 毛培胜. 我国东北地区羊草种子生产经营现状分析//第三届中国草业大会论文集.呼和浩特: 中国畜牧业协会, 2014. | |
38 | Wang Z Q. Saline soil in Chinese. Beijing: Science Press, 1993: 1-20. |
王遵亲. 我国盐渍土. 北京: 科学出版社, 1993: 1-20. | |
39 | Xu Z Y, Dong J S. Experimental study on feed value of Leymus chinensis. Journal of Northeast Agricultural College, 1957(1): 1-2. |
许振英, 董景实. 羊草饲料价值试验研究. 东北农学院学报, 1957(1): 1-2. |
[1] | Xuan-shuai LIU, Yan-liang SUN, Chun-hui MA, Qian-bing ZHANG. Dry matter yield and spatial distribution characteristics of phosphorus in alfalfa under bacterial-phosphorus coupling [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(9): 104-115. |
[2] | Si-qi YANG, Ya-jing BAO, Jia-qi YE, Shuai WU, Meng ZHANG, Meng-ran XU, Yu ZHAO, Xiao-tao LYU, Xing-guo HAN. Comparison of photosynthetic-CO2 response process and models of Leymus chinensis under differing nitrogen addition and mowing conditions [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(9): 160-172. |
[3] | Yan KANG, Yao-hui WANG, Tian-hui NIU, Zhe TENG, Zhi QI, Jia YANG. Functional identification of iron transport of LcZIP1 in Leymus chinensis [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(9): 173-180. |
[4] | Rui XU, Zheng WANG, Yi-ming WANG, Lian-tai SU, Li GAO, Peng ZHOU, Yuan AN. Effect of alfalfa on the yield and sucrose metabolism of rice in an alfalfa-rice rotation system [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(8): 129-140. |
[5] | Bao-qiang WANG, Wen-jing MA, Xian WANG, Xiao-lin ZHU, Ying ZHAO, Xiao-hong WEI. Nitric oxide regulation of secondary metabolite accumulation in Medicago sativa seedlings under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(8): 141-151. |
[6] | Wen-qing LING, Lei ZHANG, Jue LI, Qi-xian FENG, Yan LI, Yi ZHOU, Yi-jia LIU, Fu-lin YANG, Jing ZHOU. Effects of Lentilactobacillus buchneri combined with different sugars on nutrient composition, fermentation quality, rumen degradation rate, and aerobic stability of alfalfa silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7): 122-134. |
[7] | Shao-peng WANG, Jia LIU, Jun HONG, Ji-zhen LIN, Yi ZHANG, Kun SHI, Zan WANG. Cloning and function analysis of MsPPR1 in alfalfa under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7): 49-60. |
[8] | Xiao-xia AN, Ying-ying ZHANG, Chun-hui MA, Man LI, Qian-bing ZHANG. Effects of phosphorus application and inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on alfalfa yield and phosphorus use efficiency [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(6): 71-84. |
[9] | Ting YE, Xiao-juan WU, Yi-xiao LU, Sheng-juan LIU, Zhuo-hui JIANG, Hui-min YANG. Effect of planting ratio on the stability of forage yield and population density in two alfalfa-grass mixtures [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 127-137. |
[10] | Zi-fan WANG, Xiao-qing ZHANG, Zhi-ming ZHONG, Xin QUAN. Effects of oat hay and oat cubes on feeding behavior and production performance of Pengbo semi-fine wool sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 171-179. |
[11] | Ji FENG, Zhi-kuo LIU, Hai-yan LI, Yun-fei YANG, Jian GUO. Effects of enclosure and long-term mowing on vegetative reproduction characteristics of Leymus chinensis and Arundinella hirta populations in the Songnen Grassland, China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 50-60. |
[12] | Shi-min ZHANG, Jiao-yang ZHAO, Hui-sen ZHU, Kai WEI, Yong-xin WANG. Effects of selenium on metabolic transformation and morphogenesis in different varieties of alfalfa during the germination stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(4): 79-90. |
[13] | Yuan WANG, Jing WANG, Shu-xia LI. Cloning of MsBBX24 from alfalfa (Medicago sativa) and determination of its role in salt tolerance [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 107-117. |
[14] | Mao-jian WANG, Wei SHI, Sheng-hua CHANG, Cheng ZHANG, Qian-min JIA, Fu-jiang HOU. Effects of irrigation modes on forage yield, quality and water use of corn-legume intercropping systems in the Hexi irrigation area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 13-29. |
[15] | Shou-jiang SUN, Yi-han TANG, Wen MA, Man-li LI, Pei-sheng MAO. Response of the mitochondrial AsA-GSH cycle during alfalfa seed germination under low temperature stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 152-162. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||