Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 197-210.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025191
Jin-shun ZHAN1(
), Hao-yun JIANG1, Hao-bin JIA1, Hai-bo WANG1,2, Zhi-yong GU1,3, Yue PAN1,3, Xiao-jun ZHONG1, Jun-hong HUO1(
)
Received:2025-05-12
Revised:2025-08-07
Online:2026-04-20
Published:2026-02-07
Contact:
Jun-hong HUO
Jin-shun ZHAN, Hao-yun JIANG, Hao-bin JIA, Hai-bo WANG, Zhi-yong GU, Yue PAN, Xiao-jun ZHONG, Jun-hong HUO. A comparative study of the growth rate, blood biochemical indexes and rumen fermentation of hybrid sheep from different breed combinations[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 197-210.
| 项目Item | HH | AH | DH | XH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 配种母羊数Number of mating ewes | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| 发情率Estrus rate (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 受胎率Pregnancy rate (%) | 96.67 | 93.33 | 96.67 | 96.67 |
| 产羔数Number of newborn lambs | 64 | 52 | 54 | 57 |
| 产羔率Lambing rate (%) | 220.69 | 185.71 | 186.21 | 196.55 |
| 断奶羔羊数Number of weaned lambs | 58 | 50 | 53 | 57 |
| 断奶成活率Weaning survival rate of lamb (%) | 90.63 | 96.15 | 98.15 | 100.00 |
Table 1 Reproductive performance of ewes in different cross combinations
| 项目Item | HH | AH | DH | XH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 配种母羊数Number of mating ewes | 30 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| 发情率Estrus rate (%) | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 受胎率Pregnancy rate (%) | 96.67 | 93.33 | 96.67 | 96.67 |
| 产羔数Number of newborn lambs | 64 | 52 | 54 | 57 |
| 产羔率Lambing rate (%) | 220.69 | 185.71 | 186.21 | 196.55 |
| 断奶羔羊数Number of weaned lambs | 58 | 50 | 53 | 57 |
| 断奶成活率Weaning survival rate of lamb (%) | 90.63 | 96.15 | 98.15 | 100.00 |
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 3.32±0.14d | 9.87±1.06bcd | 14.78±2.49 | 17.07±2.97b | 30.79±1.80e | 44.75±3.49 | |
| 母Female | 3.53±0.44cd | 9.26±1.40d | 13.63±1.52 | 14.78±2.15b | 27.32±1.51f | 41.70±4.33 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 3.55±0.55cd | 10.75±1.34abcd | 15.00±2.67 | 27.70±2.85ab | 49.48±3.34b | 53.30±3.14 | |
| 母Female | 4.23±0.42b | 11.21±1.67ab | 15.51±2.92 | 25.91±2.02ab | 42.21±2.48c | 47.99±6.18 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 4.02±0.63bc | 11.30±1.79ab | 15.09±3.00 | 31.89±3.65a | 52.73±2.49a | 59.30±4.61 | |
| 母Female | 3.81±0.40bcd | 9.48±0.92cd | 14.91±2.20 | 26.16±2.95ab | 43.18±3.11c | 49.39±4.15 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 5.12±0.97a | 11.69±2.70a | 18.03±1.77 | 28.22±5.31ab | 38.62±6.26d | 54.22±6.41 | |
| 母Female | 4.86±0.63a | 10.96±1.56abc | 17.15±1.77 | 25.22±2.04b | 33.09±2.84e | 46.11±3.29 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种 Breed | HH | 3.43±0.34c | 9.56±1.25b | 14.20±2.09b | 15.92±2.89c | 29.05±2.40d | 43.22±4.14c |
| AH | 3.89±0.59b | 10.98±1.49a | 15.26±2.74b | 26.81±2.57b | 45.84±4.70b | 50.65±5.49b | ||
| DH | 3.91±0.52b | 10.39±1.67ab | 15.00±2.57b | 29.03±4.37a | 47.95±5.61a | 54.35±6.64a | ||
| XH | 4.99±0.81a | 11.32±2.18a | 17.59±1.78a | 26.72±4.21b | 35.85±5.52c | 50.16±6.48b | ||
性别 Sex | 公Male | 4.00±0.94 | 10.90±1.89 | 15.73±2.78 | 26.22±6.69a | 42.90±9.59a | 52.89±6.89a | |
| 母Female | 4.11±0.69 | 10.23±1.62 | 15.30±2.45 | 23.02±5.35b | 36.45±7.10b | 46.30±5.31b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | 0.006 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.415 | 0.069 | 0.420 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.038 | 0.007 | 0.678 | <0.001 | 0.032 | 0.100 | ||
Table 2 Comparison of body weight of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (kg)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 3.32±0.14d | 9.87±1.06bcd | 14.78±2.49 | 17.07±2.97b | 30.79±1.80e | 44.75±3.49 | |
| 母Female | 3.53±0.44cd | 9.26±1.40d | 13.63±1.52 | 14.78±2.15b | 27.32±1.51f | 41.70±4.33 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 3.55±0.55cd | 10.75±1.34abcd | 15.00±2.67 | 27.70±2.85ab | 49.48±3.34b | 53.30±3.14 | |
| 母Female | 4.23±0.42b | 11.21±1.67ab | 15.51±2.92 | 25.91±2.02ab | 42.21±2.48c | 47.99±6.18 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 4.02±0.63bc | 11.30±1.79ab | 15.09±3.00 | 31.89±3.65a | 52.73±2.49a | 59.30±4.61 | |
| 母Female | 3.81±0.40bcd | 9.48±0.92cd | 14.91±2.20 | 26.16±2.95ab | 43.18±3.11c | 49.39±4.15 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 5.12±0.97a | 11.69±2.70a | 18.03±1.77 | 28.22±5.31ab | 38.62±6.26d | 54.22±6.41 | |
| 母Female | 4.86±0.63a | 10.96±1.56abc | 17.15±1.77 | 25.22±2.04b | 33.09±2.84e | 46.11±3.29 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种 Breed | HH | 3.43±0.34c | 9.56±1.25b | 14.20±2.09b | 15.92±2.89c | 29.05±2.40d | 43.22±4.14c |
| AH | 3.89±0.59b | 10.98±1.49a | 15.26±2.74b | 26.81±2.57b | 45.84±4.70b | 50.65±5.49b | ||
| DH | 3.91±0.52b | 10.39±1.67ab | 15.00±2.57b | 29.03±4.37a | 47.95±5.61a | 54.35±6.64a | ||
| XH | 4.99±0.81a | 11.32±2.18a | 17.59±1.78a | 26.72±4.21b | 35.85±5.52c | 50.16±6.48b | ||
性别 Sex | 公Male | 4.00±0.94 | 10.90±1.89 | 15.73±2.78 | 26.22±6.69a | 42.90±9.59a | 52.89±6.89a | |
| 母Female | 4.11±0.69 | 10.23±1.62 | 15.30±2.45 | 23.02±5.35b | 36.45±7.10b | 46.30±5.31b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | 0.006 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.415 | 0.069 | 0.420 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.038 | 0.007 | 0.678 | <0.001 | 0.032 | 0.100 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1~30 d | 30~90 d | 90~180 d | 180~360 d | 1~90 d | 1~180 d | 1~360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 0.22±0.03 | 0.12±0.04 | 0.15±0.02 | 0.08±0.02 | 0.15±0.03 | 0.15±0.01 | 0.12±0.01 | |
| 母Female | 0.19±0.04 | 0.09±0.04 | 0.14±0.03 | 0.08±0.03 | 0.12±0.03 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.11±0.01 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 0.24±0.04 | 0.28±0.05 | 0.24±0.05 | 0.02±0.02 | 0.27±0.03 | 0.26±0.02 | 0.12±0.02 | |
| 母Female | 0.23±0.05 | 0.25±0.04 | 0.18±0.03 | 0.03±0.03 | 0.24±0.02 | 0.21±0.01 | 0.14±0.01 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 0.24±0.07 | 0.34±0.07 | 0.23±0.05 | 0.04±0.03 | 0.31±0.04 | 0.27±0.01 | 0.15±0.01 | |
| 母Female | 0.19±0.04 | 0.28±0.05 | 0.19±0.04 | 0.03±0.02 | 0.25±0.03 | 0.22±0.02 | 0.13±0.01 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 0.22±0.07 | 0.28±0.06 | 0.12±0.02 | 0.09±0.04 | 0.26±0.06 | 0.19±0.04 | 0.14±0.02 | |
| 母Female | 0.20±0.04 | 0.24±0.03 | 0.09±0.01 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.23±0.02 | 0.16±0.01 | 0.11±0.01 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种 Breed | HH | 0.20±0.04 | 0.11±0.04c | 0.15±0.03b | 0.08±0.02a | 0.14±0.03c | 0.14±0.01d | 0.11±0.01c |
| AH | 0.24±0.05 | 0.26±0.05b | 0.21±0.05a | 0.03±0.03b | 0.25±0.03b | 0.23±0.03b | 0.13±0.02b | ||
| DH | 0.22±0.06 | 0.31±0.07a | 0.21±0.05a | 0.04±0.03b | 0.28±0.05a | 0.24±0.03a | 0.14±0.02a | ||
| XH | 0.21±0.06 | 0.26±0.05b | 0.10±0.02c | 0.08±0.03a | 0.24±0.05b | 0.17±0.03c | 0.13±0.02b | ||
性别 Sex | 公Male | 0.23±0.06a | 0.26±0.10a | 0.19±0.07a | 0.06±0.04 | 0.25±0.07a | 0.22±0.05a | 0.14±0.02a | |
| 母Female | 0.20±0.05b | 0.21±0.08b | 0.15±0.05b | 0.05±0.03 | 0.21±0.06b | 0.18±0.04b | 0.12±0.01b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.232 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.026 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.892 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.493 | 0.655 | 0.164 | 0.503 | 0.356 | 0.117 | 0.156 | ||
Table 3 Comparison of average daily gain of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (kg)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1~30 d | 30~90 d | 90~180 d | 180~360 d | 1~90 d | 1~180 d | 1~360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 0.22±0.03 | 0.12±0.04 | 0.15±0.02 | 0.08±0.02 | 0.15±0.03 | 0.15±0.01 | 0.12±0.01 | |
| 母Female | 0.19±0.04 | 0.09±0.04 | 0.14±0.03 | 0.08±0.03 | 0.12±0.03 | 0.13±0.01 | 0.11±0.01 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 0.24±0.04 | 0.28±0.05 | 0.24±0.05 | 0.02±0.02 | 0.27±0.03 | 0.26±0.02 | 0.12±0.02 | |
| 母Female | 0.23±0.05 | 0.25±0.04 | 0.18±0.03 | 0.03±0.03 | 0.24±0.02 | 0.21±0.01 | 0.14±0.01 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 0.24±0.07 | 0.34±0.07 | 0.23±0.05 | 0.04±0.03 | 0.31±0.04 | 0.27±0.01 | 0.15±0.01 | |
| 母Female | 0.19±0.04 | 0.28±0.05 | 0.19±0.04 | 0.03±0.02 | 0.25±0.03 | 0.22±0.02 | 0.13±0.01 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 0.22±0.07 | 0.28±0.06 | 0.12±0.02 | 0.09±0.04 | 0.26±0.06 | 0.19±0.04 | 0.14±0.02 | |
| 母Female | 0.20±0.04 | 0.24±0.03 | 0.09±0.01 | 0.07±0.01 | 0.23±0.02 | 0.16±0.01 | 0.11±0.01 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种 Breed | HH | 0.20±0.04 | 0.11±0.04c | 0.15±0.03b | 0.08±0.02a | 0.14±0.03c | 0.14±0.01d | 0.11±0.01c |
| AH | 0.24±0.05 | 0.26±0.05b | 0.21±0.05a | 0.03±0.03b | 0.25±0.03b | 0.23±0.03b | 0.13±0.02b | ||
| DH | 0.22±0.06 | 0.31±0.07a | 0.21±0.05a | 0.04±0.03b | 0.28±0.05a | 0.24±0.03a | 0.14±0.02a | ||
| XH | 0.21±0.06 | 0.26±0.05b | 0.10±0.02c | 0.08±0.03a | 0.24±0.05b | 0.17±0.03c | 0.13±0.02b | ||
性别 Sex | 公Male | 0.23±0.06a | 0.26±0.10a | 0.19±0.07a | 0.06±0.04 | 0.25±0.07a | 0.22±0.05a | 0.14±0.02a | |
| 母Female | 0.20±0.05b | 0.21±0.08b | 0.15±0.05b | 0.05±0.03 | 0.21±0.06b | 0.18±0.04b | 0.12±0.01b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.232 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.026 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.892 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.493 | 0.655 | 0.164 | 0.503 | 0.356 | 0.117 | 0.156 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 28.84±1.82c | 42.97±3.31 | 47.81±2.91 | 55.14±3.94 | 61.14±4.11 | 69.70±4.59 | |
| 母Female | 32.86±2.18ab | 40.50±4.24 | 46.02±4.05 | 53.34±3.32 | 58.11±2.10 | 67.96±5.48 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 30.52±2.13bc | 44.63±3.93 | 50.10±3.53 | 59.47±2.88 | 70.83±3.51 | 74.24±3.69 | |
| 母Female | 31.92±2.39b | 44.70±3.26 | 50.60±3.58 | 61.42±3.17 | 64.92±2.68 | 73.46±3.78 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 32.30±1.99ab | 43.95±4.61 | 50.46±3.25 | 60.97±5.30 | 71.65±3.74 | 78.76±3.82 | |
| 母Female | 31.85±2.43b | 43.78±1.33 | 49.90±3.99 | 61.36±2.51 | 65.06±0.87 | 72.46±3.53 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 32.92±3.68ab | 40.80±2.24 | 47.65±2.70 | 53.55±5.17 | 63.07±5.96 | 66.10±4.94 | |
| 母Female | 34.52±2.75a | 40.78±2.78 | 47.15±1.12 | 56.04±3.81 | 61.16±2.55 | 65.53±1.75 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 30.85±2.84b | 41.73±3.91b | 46.92±3.55b | 54.24±3.66b | 59.63±3.54b | 68.83±5.00b |
| AH | 31.22±2.32b | 44.66±3.51a | 50.35±3.47a | 60.45±3.11a | 67.88±4.29a | 73.85±3.66a | ||
| DH | 32.08±2.17ab | 43.87±3.31a | 50.18±3.56a | 61.17±4.04a | 68.35±4.29a | 75.61±4.82a | ||
| XH | 33.72±3.26a | 40.79±2.46b | 47.40±2.03b | 54.80±4.60b | 62.12±4.57b | 65.82±3.62c | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 31.15±2.91b | 43.09±3.78 | 49.01±3.26 | 57.28±5.25 | 66.67±6.33a | 72.20±6.34a | |
| 母Female | 32.79±2.59a | 42.44±3.50 | 48.42±3.79 | 58.04±4.70 | 62.31±3.59b | 69.85±4.96b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.004 | 0.394 | 0.394 | 0.385 | <0.001 | 0.012 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.049 | 0.584 | 0.584 | 0.305 | 0.112 | 0.100 | ||
Table 4 Comparison of body height of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (cm)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 28.84±1.82c | 42.97±3.31 | 47.81±2.91 | 55.14±3.94 | 61.14±4.11 | 69.70±4.59 | |
| 母Female | 32.86±2.18ab | 40.50±4.24 | 46.02±4.05 | 53.34±3.32 | 58.11±2.10 | 67.96±5.48 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 30.52±2.13bc | 44.63±3.93 | 50.10±3.53 | 59.47±2.88 | 70.83±3.51 | 74.24±3.69 | |
| 母Female | 31.92±2.39b | 44.70±3.26 | 50.60±3.58 | 61.42±3.17 | 64.92±2.68 | 73.46±3.78 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 32.30±1.99ab | 43.95±4.61 | 50.46±3.25 | 60.97±5.30 | 71.65±3.74 | 78.76±3.82 | |
| 母Female | 31.85±2.43b | 43.78±1.33 | 49.90±3.99 | 61.36±2.51 | 65.06±0.87 | 72.46±3.53 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 32.92±3.68ab | 40.80±2.24 | 47.65±2.70 | 53.55±5.17 | 63.07±5.96 | 66.10±4.94 | |
| 母Female | 34.52±2.75a | 40.78±2.78 | 47.15±1.12 | 56.04±3.81 | 61.16±2.55 | 65.53±1.75 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 30.85±2.84b | 41.73±3.91b | 46.92±3.55b | 54.24±3.66b | 59.63±3.54b | 68.83±5.00b |
| AH | 31.22±2.32b | 44.66±3.51a | 50.35±3.47a | 60.45±3.11a | 67.88±4.29a | 73.85±3.66a | ||
| DH | 32.08±2.17ab | 43.87±3.31a | 50.18±3.56a | 61.17±4.04a | 68.35±4.29a | 75.61±4.82a | ||
| XH | 33.72±3.26a | 40.79±2.46b | 47.40±2.03b | 54.80±4.60b | 62.12±4.57b | 65.82±3.62c | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 31.15±2.91b | 43.09±3.78 | 49.01±3.26 | 57.28±5.25 | 66.67±6.33a | 72.20±6.34a | |
| 母Female | 32.79±2.59a | 42.44±3.50 | 48.42±3.79 | 58.04±4.70 | 62.31±3.59b | 69.85±4.96b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.002 | 0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.004 | 0.394 | 0.394 | 0.385 | <0.001 | 0.012 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.049 | 0.584 | 0.584 | 0.305 | 0.112 | 0.100 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 39.20±1.46ab | 48.87±1.02 | 51.98±2.02 | 56.38±2.69 | 64.07±1.40 | 75.41±3.25 | |
| 母Female | 38.46±2.11bc | 45.75±2.22 | 48.96±2.60 | 53.58±3.06 | 58.96±2.31 | 73.09±3.29 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 37.15±2.13bcd | 45.21±3.29 | 51.48±2.32 | 58.66±2.10 | 68.74±2.29 | 77.00±2.54 | |
| 母Female | 38.43±1.28bc | 45.37±2.72 | 49.45±2.02 | 57.67±2.78 | 66.30±2.39 | 71.51±1.71 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 35.95±2.71d | 44.65±3.29 | 49.00±3.61 | 60.14±5.12 | 67.50±2.97 | 76.19±2.54 | |
| 母Female | 36.95±2.31cd | 44.50±2.91 | 51.30±2.59 | 57.31±4.19 | 66.10±3.47 | 72.01±3.20 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 40.61±1.70a | 47.94±2.37 | 53.00±2.15 | 58.40±5.87 | 64.13±3.54 | 75.00±3.02 | |
| 母Female | 37.73±2.64bcd | 47.97±2.76 | 50.83±1.86 | 59.58±3.23 | 62.97±1.80 | 72.58±1.37 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 38.83±1.81a | 47.31±2.32a | 50.47±2.75 | 54.98±3.15b | 61.52±3.21c | 74.25±3.40 |
| AH | 37.79±1.84ab | 45.29±2.94b | 50.47±2.36 | 58.17±2.45a | 67.52±2.60a | 74.26±3.52 | ||
| DH | 36.45±2.51b | 44.57±3.02b | 50.15±3.28 | 58.73±4.78a | 66.80±3.23a | 74.10±3.53 | ||
| XH | 39.17±2.62a | 47.96±2.50a | 51.92±2.25 | 58.99±4.65a | 63.55±2.80b | 73.79±2.60 | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 38.23±2.69 | 46.67±3.13 | 51.37±2.91a | 58.40±4.31 | 66.11±3.31a | 75.90±2.85a | |
| 母Female | 37.89±2.16 | 45.90±2.87 | 50.14±2.41b | 57.04±3.90 | 63.58±3.90b | 72.30±2.52b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.168 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.942 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.447 | 0.199 | 0.043 | 0.117 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.009 | 0.165 | 0.111 | 0.306 | 0.077 | 0.201 | ||
Table 5 Comparison of body length of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (cm)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 39.20±1.46ab | 48.87±1.02 | 51.98±2.02 | 56.38±2.69 | 64.07±1.40 | 75.41±3.25 | |
| 母Female | 38.46±2.11bc | 45.75±2.22 | 48.96±2.60 | 53.58±3.06 | 58.96±2.31 | 73.09±3.29 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 37.15±2.13bcd | 45.21±3.29 | 51.48±2.32 | 58.66±2.10 | 68.74±2.29 | 77.00±2.54 | |
| 母Female | 38.43±1.28bc | 45.37±2.72 | 49.45±2.02 | 57.67±2.78 | 66.30±2.39 | 71.51±1.71 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 35.95±2.71d | 44.65±3.29 | 49.00±3.61 | 60.14±5.12 | 67.50±2.97 | 76.19±2.54 | |
| 母Female | 36.95±2.31cd | 44.50±2.91 | 51.30±2.59 | 57.31±4.19 | 66.10±3.47 | 72.01±3.20 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 40.61±1.70a | 47.94±2.37 | 53.00±2.15 | 58.40±5.87 | 64.13±3.54 | 75.00±3.02 | |
| 母Female | 37.73±2.64bcd | 47.97±2.76 | 50.83±1.86 | 59.58±3.23 | 62.97±1.80 | 72.58±1.37 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 38.83±1.81a | 47.31±2.32a | 50.47±2.75 | 54.98±3.15b | 61.52±3.21c | 74.25±3.40 |
| AH | 37.79±1.84ab | 45.29±2.94b | 50.47±2.36 | 58.17±2.45a | 67.52±2.60a | 74.26±3.52 | ||
| DH | 36.45±2.51b | 44.57±3.02b | 50.15±3.28 | 58.73±4.78a | 66.80±3.23a | 74.10±3.53 | ||
| XH | 39.17±2.62a | 47.96±2.50a | 51.92±2.25 | 58.99±4.65a | 63.55±2.80b | 73.79±2.60 | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 38.23±2.69 | 46.67±3.13 | 51.37±2.91a | 58.40±4.31 | 66.11±3.31a | 75.90±2.85a | |
| 母Female | 37.89±2.16 | 45.90±2.87 | 50.14±2.41b | 57.04±3.90 | 63.58±3.90b | 72.30±2.52b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.168 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.942 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.447 | 0.199 | 0.043 | 0.117 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.009 | 0.165 | 0.111 | 0.306 | 0.077 | 0.201 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 33.43±1.54 | 45.96±2.58 | 53.48±4.09 | 56.94±3.80 | 68.84±2.08 | 82.59±3.29 | |
| 母Female | 34.18±2.39 | 45.68±2.73 | 52.38±2.60 | 52.94±3.93 | 66.51±2.22 | 81.72±3.48 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 35.06±2.02 | 48.17±3.15 | 57.45±3.51 | 71.14±3.74 | 84.50±3.22 | 87.10±3.84 | |
| 母Female | 37.23±2.09 | 51.37±5.06 | 58.81±3.70 | 70.29±4.44 | 80.11±3.21 | 84.53±2.23 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 35.86±2.47 | 51.11±3.18 | 56.53±4.13 | 74.69±6.59 | 84.81±3.03 | 88.67±3.07 | |
| 母Female | 36.28±1.70 | 49.76±2.29 | 57.85±3.53 | 71.69±5.03 | 80.87±2.42 | 84.72±2.03 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 40.18±2.64 | 50.89±4.59 | 60.90±2.76 | 68.73±8.08 | 72.03±5.13 | 89.06±4.22 | |
| 母Female | 38.72±2.51 | 50.08±3.92 | 60.18±3.19 | 69.23±3.73 | 71.63±1.57 | 89.84±2.55 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 33.81±1.99c | 45.82±2.59b | 52.93±3.38c | 54.94±4.29c | 67.68±2.41c | 82.16±3.33c |
| AH | 36.14±2.29b | 49.77±4.42a | 58.13±3.58b | 70.72±4.02ab | 82.31±3.85a | 85.82±3.33b | ||
| DH | 36.07±2.08b | 50.43±2.79a | 57.19±3.80b | 73.19±5.91a | 82.84±3.35a | 86.70±3.24b | ||
| XH | 39.45±2.62a | 50.48±4.17a | 60.54±2.93a | 68.98±6.13b | 71.83±3.70b | 89.45±3.42a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 36.13±3.30 | 49.03±3.96 | 57.09±4.42 | 67.88±8.78 | 77.55±8.05a | 86.86±4.35 | |
| 母Female | 36.60±2.69 | 49.22±4.13 | 57.31±4.35 | 66.04±8.75 | 74.78±6.50b | 85.20±3.90 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.342 | 0.812 | 0.783 | 0.114 | <0.001 | 0.230 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.084 | 0.183 | 0.550 | 0.506 | 0.160 | 0.109 | ||
Table 6 Comparison of chest circumference of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (cm)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 33.43±1.54 | 45.96±2.58 | 53.48±4.09 | 56.94±3.80 | 68.84±2.08 | 82.59±3.29 | |
| 母Female | 34.18±2.39 | 45.68±2.73 | 52.38±2.60 | 52.94±3.93 | 66.51±2.22 | 81.72±3.48 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 35.06±2.02 | 48.17±3.15 | 57.45±3.51 | 71.14±3.74 | 84.50±3.22 | 87.10±3.84 | |
| 母Female | 37.23±2.09 | 51.37±5.06 | 58.81±3.70 | 70.29±4.44 | 80.11±3.21 | 84.53±2.23 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 35.86±2.47 | 51.11±3.18 | 56.53±4.13 | 74.69±6.59 | 84.81±3.03 | 88.67±3.07 | |
| 母Female | 36.28±1.70 | 49.76±2.29 | 57.85±3.53 | 71.69±5.03 | 80.87±2.42 | 84.72±2.03 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 40.18±2.64 | 50.89±4.59 | 60.90±2.76 | 68.73±8.08 | 72.03±5.13 | 89.06±4.22 | |
| 母Female | 38.72±2.51 | 50.08±3.92 | 60.18±3.19 | 69.23±3.73 | 71.63±1.57 | 89.84±2.55 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 33.81±1.99c | 45.82±2.59b | 52.93±3.38c | 54.94±4.29c | 67.68±2.41c | 82.16±3.33c |
| AH | 36.14±2.29b | 49.77±4.42a | 58.13±3.58b | 70.72±4.02ab | 82.31±3.85a | 85.82±3.33b | ||
| DH | 36.07±2.08b | 50.43±2.79a | 57.19±3.80b | 73.19±5.91a | 82.84±3.35a | 86.70±3.24b | ||
| XH | 39.45±2.62a | 50.48±4.17a | 60.54±2.93a | 68.98±6.13b | 71.83±3.70b | 89.45±3.42a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 36.13±3.30 | 49.03±3.96 | 57.09±4.42 | 67.88±8.78 | 77.55±8.05a | 86.86±4.35 | |
| 母Female | 36.60±2.69 | 49.22±4.13 | 57.31±4.35 | 66.04±8.75 | 74.78±6.50b | 85.20±3.90 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.342 | 0.812 | 0.783 | 0.114 | <0.001 | 0.230 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.084 | 0.183 | 0.550 | 0.506 | 0.160 | 0.109 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 5.43±0.31 | 5.93±0.30 | 6.29±0.45 | 6.92±0.50 | 7.96±0.40 | 8.57±0.36 | |
| 母Female | 5.15±0.38 | 5.64±0.41 | 5.90±0.48 | 6.56±0.25 | 7.68±0.41 | 8.12±0.28 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 5.91±0.46 | 6.62±0.76 | 7.80±0.35 | 7.90±0.48 | 8.66±0.45 | 9.71±0.47 | |
| 母Female | 6.10±0.52 | 6.87±0.68 | 7.56±0.32 | 7.85±0.29 | 8.31±0.17 | 9.00±0.43 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 5.77±0.51 | 6.60±0.38 | 7.82±0.53 | 8.41±0.26 | 8.97±0.21 | 10.01±0.47 | |
| 母Female | 5.89±0.40 | 6.76±0.50 | 7.69±0.40 | 8.06±0.19 | 8.44±0.24 | 9.44±0.34 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 6.32±0.27 | 6.67±0.29 | 7.12±0.18 | 7.71±0.74 | 8.95±0.95 | 9.58±0.70 | |
| 母Female | 6.39±0.39 | 6.69±0.43 | 6.81±0.38 | 7.23±0.42 | 8.06±0.61 | 9.06±0.38 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 5.29±0.37c | 5.79±0.38b | 6.10±0.50c | 6.74±0.43d | 7.82±0.42b | 8.35±0.39c |
| AH | 6.00±0.49b | 6.75±0.71a | 7.68±0.35a | 7.88±0.39b | 8.49±0.37a | 9.36±0.57b | ||
| DH | 5.83±0.45b | 6.68±0.44a | 7.76±0.46a | 8.24±0.28a | 8.71±0.35a | 9.73±0.49a | ||
| XH | 6.36±0.33a | 6.68±0.35a | 6.97±0.33b | 7.47±0.64c | 8.51±0.90a | 9.32±0.61b | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 5.86±0.50 | 6.46±0.55 | 7.26±0.74a | 7.73±0.74a | 8.64±0.69a | 9.47±0.74a | |
| 母Female | 5.88±0.62 | 6.49±0.70 | 6.99±0.82b | 7.41±0.66b | 8.12±0.48b | 8.91±0.60b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.775 | 0.753 | 0.004 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.282 | 0.329 | 0.767 | 0.434 | 0.212 | 0.882 | ||
Table 7 Comparison of tube circumference of sheep at different stages in different hybrid combinations (cm)
| 品种Breed | 性别Sex | 1 d | 30 d | 60 d | 90 d | 180 d | 360 d | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 5.43±0.31 | 5.93±0.30 | 6.29±0.45 | 6.92±0.50 | 7.96±0.40 | 8.57±0.36 | |
| 母Female | 5.15±0.38 | 5.64±0.41 | 5.90±0.48 | 6.56±0.25 | 7.68±0.41 | 8.12±0.28 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 5.91±0.46 | 6.62±0.76 | 7.80±0.35 | 7.90±0.48 | 8.66±0.45 | 9.71±0.47 | |
| 母Female | 6.10±0.52 | 6.87±0.68 | 7.56±0.32 | 7.85±0.29 | 8.31±0.17 | 9.00±0.43 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 5.77±0.51 | 6.60±0.38 | 7.82±0.53 | 8.41±0.26 | 8.97±0.21 | 10.01±0.47 | |
| 母Female | 5.89±0.40 | 6.76±0.50 | 7.69±0.40 | 8.06±0.19 | 8.44±0.24 | 9.44±0.34 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 6.32±0.27 | 6.67±0.29 | 7.12±0.18 | 7.71±0.74 | 8.95±0.95 | 9.58±0.70 | |
| 母Female | 6.39±0.39 | 6.69±0.43 | 6.81±0.38 | 7.23±0.42 | 8.06±0.61 | 9.06±0.38 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 5.29±0.37c | 5.79±0.38b | 6.10±0.50c | 6.74±0.43d | 7.82±0.42b | 8.35±0.39c |
| AH | 6.00±0.49b | 6.75±0.71a | 7.68±0.35a | 7.88±0.39b | 8.49±0.37a | 9.36±0.57b | ||
| DH | 5.83±0.45b | 6.68±0.44a | 7.76±0.46a | 8.24±0.28a | 8.71±0.35a | 9.73±0.49a | ||
| XH | 6.36±0.33a | 6.68±0.35a | 6.97±0.33b | 7.47±0.64c | 8.51±0.90a | 9.32±0.61b | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 5.86±0.50 | 6.46±0.55 | 7.26±0.74a | 7.73±0.74a | 8.64±0.69a | 9.47±0.74a | |
| 母Female | 5.88±0.62 | 6.49±0.70 | 6.99±0.82b | 7.41±0.66b | 8.12±0.48b | 8.91±0.60b | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.775 | 0.753 | 0.004 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.282 | 0.329 | 0.767 | 0.434 | 0.212 | 0.882 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别 Sex | TP (g·L-1) | ALB (g·L-1) | AST (U·L-1) | ALT (U·L-1) | BUN (mmol·L-1) | CRE (μmol·L-1) | TG (mmol·L-1) | TC (mmol·L-1) | HDL (mmol·L-1) | LDL (mmol·L-1) | GLU (mmol·L-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 25.94±1.83 | 20.12±4.83 | 12.86±10.37 | 26.74±20.85a | 3.96±1.73 | 59.83±11.79 | 0.19±0.14 | 3.25±1.40 | 1.36±0.24 | 3.64±1.28 | 4.88±0.48 | |
| 母Female | 26.89±3.58 | 20.24±6.11 | 11.91±6.84 | 10.79±10.25b | 3.42±2.35 | 55.27±9.33 | 0.21±0.14 | 2.72±1.08 | 1.86±0.25 | 4.53±1.29 | 4.13±0.51 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 29.25±2.93 | 25.69±6.05 | 14.03±6.43 | 7.53±4.69b | 4.72±1.72 | 67.74±7.47 | 0.18±0.06 | 3.48±0.97 | 1.83±0.53 | 4.32±1.45 | 3.33±0.58 | |
| 母Female | 28.77±4.99 | 24.22±4.83 | 13.08±2.92 | 25.31±23.47a | 4.87±1.54 | 59.32±9.76 | 0.22±0.09 | 2.90±0.48 | 1.71±0.59 | 3.92±1.09 | 3.57±1.02 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 27.56±3.47 | 28.44±7.16 | 12.44±5.72 | 12.18±7.31b | 4.69±2.29 | 70.33±10.64 | 0.24±0.09 | 3.50±0.88 | 1.47±0.32 | 3.76±1.29 | 3.28±0.42 | |
| 母Female | 30.24±2.02 | 25.24±6.32 | 23.07±17.52 | 10.66±7.04b | 4.70±1.76 | 67.90±13.35 | 0.26±0.12 | 2.64±0.70 | 1.47±0.37 | 3.66±0.85 | 3.49±0.87 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 30.99±2.53 | 31.04±10.97 | 9.66±3.45 | 9.39±8.81b | 5.23±2.17 | 72.29±8.62 | 0.27±0.05 | 2.73±0.68 | 1.89±0.36 | 4.30±0.61 | 4.52±0.88 | |
| 母Female | 33.98±3.36 | 27.21±5.28 | 8.60±5.59 | 11.99±10.13b | 6.11±1.59 | 79.40±9.55 | 0.28±0.10 | 3.04±0.80 | 2.08±0.19 | 3.94±1.26 | 4.72±0.94 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 26.42±2.79c | 20.18±5.32b | 12.38±8.57ab | 18.77±17.97 | 3.69±2.03b | 57.55±10.61c | 0.20±0.14 | 2.98±1.25 | 1.61±0.35bc | 4.09±1.33 | 4.50±0.62a |
| AH | 29.01±3.96b | 24.96±5.34a | 13.55±4.89ab | 16.42±18.83 | 4.79±1.59ab | 63.53±9.50bc | 0.20±0.08 | 3.19±0.80 | 1.77±0.55ab | 4.12±1.27 | 3.45±0.82b | ||
| DH | 28.90±3.07b | 26.84±6.73a | 17.75±13.81a | 11.42±7.03 | 4.69±1.99ab | 69.11±11.82b | 0.25±0.11 | 3.07±0.89 | 1.47±0.34c | 3.71±1.07 | 3.38±0.68b | ||
| XH | 32.48±3.26a | 29.12±8.55a | 9.13±4.55b | 10.69±9.34 | 5.67±1.91a | 75.85±9.57a | 0.28±0.08 | 2.89±0.74 | 1.99±0.30a | 4.12±0.98 | 4.62±0.89a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 28.43±3.24 | 26.32±8.32 | 12.25±6.88 | 13.96±13.94 | 4.65±1.97 | 67.55±10.55 | 0.22±0.10 | 3.24±1.03a | 1.64±0.43 | 4.01±1.20 | 4.00±0.93 | |
| 母Female | 29.97±4.36 | 24.23±5.98 | 14.16±10.99 | 14.69±15.01 | 4.78±2.01 | 65.47±13.85 | 0.24±0.11 | 2.82±0.78b | 1.78±0.43 | 4.01±1.14 | 3.98±0.96 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.021 | 0.165 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.066 | 0.753 | 0.001 | 0.632 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.062 | 0.217 | 0.320 | 0.806 | 0.774 | 0.366 | 0.323 | 0.045 | 0.094 | 0.981 | 0.892 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.398 | 0.839 | 0.085 | 0.002 | 0.707 | 0.108 | 0.976 | 0.209 | 0.064 | 0.275 | 0.107 | ||
Table 8 Comparison of serum biochemical indexes of sheep in different hybrid combinations
| 品种Breed | 性别 Sex | TP (g·L-1) | ALB (g·L-1) | AST (U·L-1) | ALT (U·L-1) | BUN (mmol·L-1) | CRE (μmol·L-1) | TG (mmol·L-1) | TC (mmol·L-1) | HDL (mmol·L-1) | LDL (mmol·L-1) | GLU (mmol·L-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 25.94±1.83 | 20.12±4.83 | 12.86±10.37 | 26.74±20.85a | 3.96±1.73 | 59.83±11.79 | 0.19±0.14 | 3.25±1.40 | 1.36±0.24 | 3.64±1.28 | 4.88±0.48 | |
| 母Female | 26.89±3.58 | 20.24±6.11 | 11.91±6.84 | 10.79±10.25b | 3.42±2.35 | 55.27±9.33 | 0.21±0.14 | 2.72±1.08 | 1.86±0.25 | 4.53±1.29 | 4.13±0.51 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 29.25±2.93 | 25.69±6.05 | 14.03±6.43 | 7.53±4.69b | 4.72±1.72 | 67.74±7.47 | 0.18±0.06 | 3.48±0.97 | 1.83±0.53 | 4.32±1.45 | 3.33±0.58 | |
| 母Female | 28.77±4.99 | 24.22±4.83 | 13.08±2.92 | 25.31±23.47a | 4.87±1.54 | 59.32±9.76 | 0.22±0.09 | 2.90±0.48 | 1.71±0.59 | 3.92±1.09 | 3.57±1.02 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 27.56±3.47 | 28.44±7.16 | 12.44±5.72 | 12.18±7.31b | 4.69±2.29 | 70.33±10.64 | 0.24±0.09 | 3.50±0.88 | 1.47±0.32 | 3.76±1.29 | 3.28±0.42 | |
| 母Female | 30.24±2.02 | 25.24±6.32 | 23.07±17.52 | 10.66±7.04b | 4.70±1.76 | 67.90±13.35 | 0.26±0.12 | 2.64±0.70 | 1.47±0.37 | 3.66±0.85 | 3.49±0.87 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 30.99±2.53 | 31.04±10.97 | 9.66±3.45 | 9.39±8.81b | 5.23±2.17 | 72.29±8.62 | 0.27±0.05 | 2.73±0.68 | 1.89±0.36 | 4.30±0.61 | 4.52±0.88 | |
| 母Female | 33.98±3.36 | 27.21±5.28 | 8.60±5.59 | 11.99±10.13b | 6.11±1.59 | 79.40±9.55 | 0.28±0.10 | 3.04±0.80 | 2.08±0.19 | 3.94±1.26 | 4.72±0.94 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 26.42±2.79c | 20.18±5.32b | 12.38±8.57ab | 18.77±17.97 | 3.69±2.03b | 57.55±10.61c | 0.20±0.14 | 2.98±1.25 | 1.61±0.35bc | 4.09±1.33 | 4.50±0.62a |
| AH | 29.01±3.96b | 24.96±5.34a | 13.55±4.89ab | 16.42±18.83 | 4.79±1.59ab | 63.53±9.50bc | 0.20±0.08 | 3.19±0.80 | 1.77±0.55ab | 4.12±1.27 | 3.45±0.82b | ||
| DH | 28.90±3.07b | 26.84±6.73a | 17.75±13.81a | 11.42±7.03 | 4.69±1.99ab | 69.11±11.82b | 0.25±0.11 | 3.07±0.89 | 1.47±0.34c | 3.71±1.07 | 3.38±0.68b | ||
| XH | 32.48±3.26a | 29.12±8.55a | 9.13±4.55b | 10.69±9.34 | 5.67±1.91a | 75.85±9.57a | 0.28±0.08 | 2.89±0.74 | 1.99±0.30a | 4.12±0.98 | 4.62±0.89a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 28.43±3.24 | 26.32±8.32 | 12.25±6.88 | 13.96±13.94 | 4.65±1.97 | 67.55±10.55 | 0.22±0.10 | 3.24±1.03a | 1.64±0.43 | 4.01±1.20 | 4.00±0.93 | |
| 母Female | 29.97±4.36 | 24.23±5.98 | 14.16±10.99 | 14.69±15.01 | 4.78±2.01 | 65.47±13.85 | 0.24±0.11 | 2.82±0.78b | 1.78±0.43 | 4.01±1.14 | 3.98±0.96 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.021 | 0.165 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.066 | 0.753 | 0.001 | 0.632 | <0.001 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.062 | 0.217 | 0.320 | 0.806 | 0.774 | 0.366 | 0.323 | 0.045 | 0.094 | 0.981 | 0.892 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.398 | 0.839 | 0.085 | 0.002 | 0.707 | 0.108 | 0.976 | 0.209 | 0.064 | 0.275 | 0.107 | ||
| 品种Breed | 性别 Sex | pH | AA (mmol·L-1) | PA (mmol·L-1) | IBA (mmol·L-1) | BA (mmol·L-1) | IVA (mmol·L-1) | VA (mmol·L-1) | TVFA (mmol·L-1) | AN (mg·dL-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 6.44±0.08 | 36.75±6.55 | 8.88±1.60 | 1.09±0.26ab | 4.85±1.40 | 1.25±0.22c | 0.47±0.14 | 53.29±7.12 | 19.32±0.30 | |
| 母Female | 6.45±0.10 | 38.38±3.30 | 7.41±0.93 | 1.19±0.13a | 4.44±0.77 | 1.22±0.14c | 0.42±0.05 | 53.05±2.71 | 18.67±1.30 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 6.41±0.09 | 42.47±8.13 | 7.84±2.27 | 1.08±0.22ab | 6.01±0.98 | 1.29±0.27c | 0.74±0.15 | 59.41±8.42 | 20.94±1.34 | |
| 母Female | 6.50±0.03 | 40.51±5.47 | 7.71±0.71 | 0.94±0.08b | 7.88±2.30 | 1.59±0.33ab | 0.75±0.15 | 59.40±5.66 | 20.00±1.03 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 6.42±0.09 | 42.13±7.32 | 9.02±2.66 | 1.15±0.14a | 6.24±0.76 | 1.43±0.24bc | 0.74±0.15 | 60.72±6.69 | 23.51±5.57 | |
| 母Female | 6.48±0.08 | 45.51±3.01 | 8.72±1.40 | 0.89±0.12b | 7.06±0.85 | 1.27±0.22c | 0.69±0.18 | 64.14±4.78 | 21.22±1.22 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 6.39±0.08 | 43.54±1.88 | 7.65±1.29 | 1.07±0.09ab | 6.94±2.02 | 1.46±0.17abc | 0.58±0.15 | 61.25±3.85 | 21.06±1.15 | |
| 母Female | 6.36±0.05 | 42.39±4.41 | 8.58±1.69 | 1.24±0.12a | 5.94±0.62 | 1.72±0.19a | 0.53±0.06 | 60.41±5.54 | 22.29±1.27 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 6.45±0.08 | 37.56±5.02b | 8.14±1.46 | 1.14±0.20 | 4.64±1.10b | 1.14±0.20ab | 0.45±0.10c | 53.17±5.14b | 19.00±0.96b |
| AH | 6.45±0.08 | 41.49±6.68ab | 7.78±1.60 | 1.01±0.18 | 6.95±1.95a | 1.01±0.18b | 0.75±0.14a | 59.40±6.84a | 20.47±1.24ab | ||
| DH | 6.45±0.08 | 43.82±5.62a | 8.87±2.03 | 1.02±0.19 | 6.65±0.88a | 1.02±0.19b | 0.72±0.16a | 62.43±5.83a | 22.37±4.03a | ||
| XH | 6.39±0.04 | 42.97±3.29a | 8.12±1.51 | 1.15±0.14 | 6.44±1.52a | 1.15±0.14a | 0.56±0.11b | 60.83±4.57a | 21.67±1.32a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 6.41±0.07 | 41.22±6.59 | 8.35±1.99 | 1.10±0.18 | 6.01±1.50 | 1.36±0.23 | 0.63±0.18 | 58.67±7.06 | 21.21±3.13 | |
| 母Female | 6.45±0.07 | 41.70±4.71 | 8.11±1.29 | 1.06±0.19 | 6.33±1.81 | 1.45±0.30 | 0.60±0.18 | 59.25±6.07 | 20.55±1.78 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.479 | 0.036 | 0.448 | 0.053 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.040 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.196 | 0.762 | 0.622 | 0.482 | 0.419 | 0.159 | 0.384 | 0.732 | 0.311 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.699 | 0.605 | 0.394 | 0.006 | 0.058 | 0.046 | 0.900 | 0.807 | 0.302 | ||
Table 9 Comparison of rumen fermentation parameters of sheep in different hybrid combinations
| 品种Breed | 性别 Sex | pH | AA (mmol·L-1) | PA (mmol·L-1) | IBA (mmol·L-1) | BA (mmol·L-1) | IVA (mmol·L-1) | VA (mmol·L-1) | TVFA (mmol·L-1) | AN (mg·dL-1) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HH | 公Male | 6.44±0.08 | 36.75±6.55 | 8.88±1.60 | 1.09±0.26ab | 4.85±1.40 | 1.25±0.22c | 0.47±0.14 | 53.29±7.12 | 19.32±0.30 | |
| 母Female | 6.45±0.10 | 38.38±3.30 | 7.41±0.93 | 1.19±0.13a | 4.44±0.77 | 1.22±0.14c | 0.42±0.05 | 53.05±2.71 | 18.67±1.30 | ||
| AH | 公Male | 6.41±0.09 | 42.47±8.13 | 7.84±2.27 | 1.08±0.22ab | 6.01±0.98 | 1.29±0.27c | 0.74±0.15 | 59.41±8.42 | 20.94±1.34 | |
| 母Female | 6.50±0.03 | 40.51±5.47 | 7.71±0.71 | 0.94±0.08b | 7.88±2.30 | 1.59±0.33ab | 0.75±0.15 | 59.40±5.66 | 20.00±1.03 | ||
| DH | 公Male | 6.42±0.09 | 42.13±7.32 | 9.02±2.66 | 1.15±0.14a | 6.24±0.76 | 1.43±0.24bc | 0.74±0.15 | 60.72±6.69 | 23.51±5.57 | |
| 母Female | 6.48±0.08 | 45.51±3.01 | 8.72±1.40 | 0.89±0.12b | 7.06±0.85 | 1.27±0.22c | 0.69±0.18 | 64.14±4.78 | 21.22±1.22 | ||
| XH | 公Male | 6.39±0.08 | 43.54±1.88 | 7.65±1.29 | 1.07±0.09ab | 6.94±2.02 | 1.46±0.17abc | 0.58±0.15 | 61.25±3.85 | 21.06±1.15 | |
| 母Female | 6.36±0.05 | 42.39±4.41 | 8.58±1.69 | 1.24±0.12a | 5.94±0.62 | 1.72±0.19a | 0.53±0.06 | 60.41±5.54 | 22.29±1.27 | ||
主效应 Main effect | 品种Breed | HH | 6.45±0.08 | 37.56±5.02b | 8.14±1.46 | 1.14±0.20 | 4.64±1.10b | 1.14±0.20ab | 0.45±0.10c | 53.17±5.14b | 19.00±0.96b |
| AH | 6.45±0.08 | 41.49±6.68ab | 7.78±1.60 | 1.01±0.18 | 6.95±1.95a | 1.01±0.18b | 0.75±0.14a | 59.40±6.84a | 20.47±1.24ab | ||
| DH | 6.45±0.08 | 43.82±5.62a | 8.87±2.03 | 1.02±0.19 | 6.65±0.88a | 1.02±0.19b | 0.72±0.16a | 62.43±5.83a | 22.37±4.03a | ||
| XH | 6.39±0.04 | 42.97±3.29a | 8.12±1.51 | 1.15±0.14 | 6.44±1.52a | 1.15±0.14a | 0.56±0.11b | 60.83±4.57a | 21.67±1.32a | ||
| 性别Sex | 公Male | 6.41±0.07 | 41.22±6.59 | 8.35±1.99 | 1.10±0.18 | 6.01±1.50 | 1.36±0.23 | 0.63±0.18 | 58.67±7.06 | 21.21±3.13 | |
| 母Female | 6.45±0.07 | 41.70±4.71 | 8.11±1.29 | 1.06±0.19 | 6.33±1.81 | 1.45±0.30 | 0.60±0.18 | 59.25±6.07 | 20.55±1.78 | ||
P值 P value | 品种Breed | 0.479 | 0.036 | 0.448 | 0.053 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.040 | |
| 性别Sex | 0.196 | 0.762 | 0.622 | 0.482 | 0.419 | 0.159 | 0.384 | 0.732 | 0.311 | ||
| 品种×性别Breed×sex | 0.699 | 0.605 | 0.394 | 0.006 | 0.058 | 0.046 | 0.900 | 0.807 | 0.302 | ||
| [1] | Zhan J S, Yang Q, Zhong X J, et al. Effects of total mixed rations with different concentration-roughage ratios on meat quality, serumindices, and intestinal tract development in Hu sheep. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(12): 3166-3174. |
| 占今舜, 杨群, 钟小军, 等. 不同精粗比饲粮对湖羊肉品质、血液指标和肠道发育的影响. 草业科学, 2019, 36(12): 3166-3174. | |
| [2] | Li Q, Shao Y W K, Feng T Y, et al. Research progress on the effects of different hybrid combinations of meat sheep in China. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2019 (19) : 43-45. |
| 李倩, 邵勇维克, 冯天雨, 等. 我国肉用绵羊不同杂交组合效果研究进展. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2019(19): 43-45. | |
| [3] | Jiang X M, Zhang Y H, Maerziya·Yasen, et al. Research progress on the introduction of Australian White sheep into China. Grass Feeding Livestock, 2022(2): 1-6. |
| 蒋晓梅, 张艳花, 玛尔孜娅·亚森, 等. 我国引入澳洲白绵羊的研究进展. 草食家畜, 2022(2): 1-6. | |
| [4] | Wang Y F, Wang Y Y, Li X H. LEF1 bioinformatics and expression analysis in Dorper sheep. China Herbivore Science, 2022, 42(4): 13-17. |
| 王翊帆, 王雅艳, 李新海. 杜泊羊LEF1生物信息学及表达分析. 中国草食动物科学, 2022, 42(4): 13-17. | |
| [5] | Zhang Y D, Wang L, Yan T Y, et al. Study on the hybrid effect of Australian White sheep, Dorpersheep and small-tailed Han sheep. China Herbivore Science, 2014, 34(6): 10-12. |
| 张永东, 王磊, 严天元, 等. 澳洲白羊、杜泊羊与小尾寒羊杂交效果研究. 中国草食动物科学, 2014, 34(6): 10-12. | |
| [6] | Yang D L, Yang D G, An Y F, et al. Study on hybrid effect of Tibetan sheep of Qinghai Plateau type and Australian White sheep, black-headed Dorper sheep, black-headed Suffolk sheep. China Herbivore Science, 2019, 39(6): 70-72. |
| 杨杜录, 杨东贵, 安玉峰, 等. 青海高原型藏羊与澳洲白羊、黑头杜泊羊、黑头萨福克羊杂交效果的研究. 中国草食动物科学, 2019, 39(6): 70-72. | |
| [7] | Kong L X, Yang X Y, Lian Z Q, et al. A comparative study on the improvements by crossbreeding of Dorper sheep and Australian White sheep with Hu sheep. Animal Husbandry&Veterinary Medicine, 2018, 50(8): 6-10. |
| 孔令旋, 杨新月, 练志全, 等. 杜泊羊、澳洲白绵羊与湖羊杂交效果的比较. 畜牧与兽医, 2018, 50 (8): 6-10. | |
| [8] | Wang X, Wang G C, Xia D C, et al. The analysis of correlation and multiple regression on body weight and body size of Charolais sheep. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2024, 60 (7): 133-136. |
| 王鑫, 王国春, 夏德翠, 等. 夏洛来羊体重与体尺相关性及多元回归分析. 中国畜牧杂志, 2024, 60 (7): 133-136. | |
| [9] | Wang J, Shen C X, Luo Z Q, et al. Analysis on hybrid improvement effect of Charolais sheep and small-tailed Han sheep. The Chinese Livestock and Poultry Breeding, 2017 (3): 69-71. |
| 王军, 谌春湘, 骆志强, 等. 夏洛莱羊与小尾寒羊杂交改良效果分析. 中国畜禽种业, 2017 (3): 69-71. | |
| [10] | Liu Y J, Wang J T, Liu Z Z, et al. Screening of hybrid combinations and genetic effects analysis of GLPG gene in meat sheep. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2020, 51(1): 55-63. |
| 刘艳军, 王建涛, 刘铮铸, 等. 肉用绵羊二元杂交组合的筛选及GLPG基因遗传效应研究. 畜牧兽医学报, 2020, 51(1): 55-63. | |
| [11] | Agricultural Industry Standard of the People’s Republic of China. Nutrient requirements of meat-type sheep and goat: NY/T 816-2021. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2022. |
| 中华人民共和国农业行业标准. 肉羊营养需要量: NY/T 816-2021. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2022. | |
| [12] | Gao L Q, Zhan J S, Hu Y, et al. Effects of total mixed ration with different concentration-roughage ratios on growth performance, serum hormone concentrations and slaughter performance of Hu sheep. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(4): 1676-1684. |
| 高林青, 占今舜, 胡耀, 等. 不同精粗比全混合日粮对湖羊生长性能、血清激素浓度和屠宰性能的影响. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(4): 1676-1684. | |
| [13] | Zhan J S, Liu Y, Zhan Y P, et al. Effects of dietary protein level on meat quality, serum enzyme activity and intestinal development of Guangfeng goat. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(3): 1493-1502. |
| 占今舜, 刘远, 占咏平, 等. 饲粮蛋白质水平对广丰山羊肉品质、血清酶活性、瘤胃发酵和肠道发育的影响. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(3): 1493-1502. | |
| [14] | Pan X R, Chen G R, Wang X P, et al. The study on hybridization experiment of Australian White sheep, Dorper sheep, and small-tailed Han sheep, Hu sheep. Gansu Animal Husbandry and Veterinary, 2017, 47(10): 113-114, 119. |
| 潘晓荣, 陈广仁, 王晓平, 等. 澳洲白、杜泊羊与小尾寒羊、湖羊杂交试验研究. 甘肃畜牧兽医, 2017, 47(10): 113-114, 119. | |
| [15] | Chen G R, Pan X R, Yuan Y, et al. Evaluation of hybrid effect between Australian White sheep and Hu sheep in Hexi Corridor of Gansu Province. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2019, 28(3): 323-329. |
| 陈广仁, 潘晓荣, 袁勇, 等. 澳洲白绵羊与湖羊在甘肃河西走廊区杂交效果评价. 西北农业学报, 2019, 28(3): 323-329. | |
| [16] | Luo Y, Pareha·Paerhati, Yang L X, et al. Improvement experiment of hybrid breed between Dorper and Hu sheep. Agricultural Engineering Technology, 2024, 44(6): 28-29. |
| 罗渝, 帕热哈·帕尔哈提, 杨玲霞, 等. 杜泊羊与湖羊杂交品种改良试验. 农业工程技术, 2024, 44(6): 28-29. | |
| [17] | Zhan J S, Zhong X J, Zhan Q B, et al. Effects of concentrates with different protein levels on growth performance, slaughter performance and serum biochemical indexes of Guangfeng goat. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(1): 528-536. |
| 占今舜, 钟小军, 占清标, 等. 不同蛋白质水平精料对广丰山羊生长性能、屠宰性能和血清生化指标的影响. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(1): 528-536. | |
| [18] | Guo S X, Wang Q, Liu L L, et al. Analysis of the correlation between body weight and body size of Duolang sheep and Duohu F2 generation. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2021(15): 56-60. |
| 郭锁鑫, 王琼, 刘玲玲, 等. 多浪羊与多湖F2代体重与体尺指标的相关关系分析. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2021 (15): 56-60. | |
| [19] | Qi P, Wang X W, Zhang J, et al. Research on lambing number, early growth performance and fattening performance of the hybrid generation between Dorper sheep/Suffolk sheep and Hu sheep. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2024 (22): 53-57. |
| 亓鹏, 王小伟, 张菊, 等. 杜泊羊、萨福克羊与湖羊杂交一代产羔数、羔羊早期生长性能和育肥性能的研究. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2024(22): 53-57. | |
| [20] | Wang Z W, Mao Y Y, Sun R F, et al. Study on hybrid effect of different meat sheep breeds and Hu Sheep. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2016(10): 88-90. |
| 王志武, 毛杨毅, 孙锐锋, 等. 不同肉羊品种与湖羊杂交效果研究. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2016(10): 88-90. | |
| [21] | He M C, Dong H, Yang J X, et al. Screening hybrid combinations of Hu sheep. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 54(1): 22-26. |
| 何茂昌, 董和, 杨军祥, 等. 湖羊杂交组合筛选试验研究. 畜牧与兽医, 2022, 54(1): 22-26. | |
| [22] | Zhan J S, Huo J H, Zhong X J, et al. Effects of diet added with rutin on growth performance, serum biochemical indexes and hormone levels and rumen fermentation of Hu sheep. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(5): 2717-2726. |
| 占今舜, 霍俊宏, 钟小军, 等. 饲粮中添加芦丁对湖羊生长性能、血清生化指标和激素水平及瘤胃发酵的影响. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(5): 2717-2726. | |
| [23] | Tian M, Han C M, Liu K, et al. Variation regularity and correlation analysis of blood biochemical indicators in dairy goats during different lactation stages. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 2024, 45(10): 36-42. |
| 田敏, 韩程名, 刘坤, 等. 不同泌乳时期奶山羊血液生化指标变化规律及其相关性分析. 家畜生态学报, 2024, 45(10): 36-42. | |
| [24] | Zhan J S, Jiang H Y, Wang H B, et al. The changes of serum biochemical indexes, oxidation resistance and immune property in pre and post-weaning lambs. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 202-211. |
| 占今舜, 江浩筠, 王海波, 等. 羔羊断奶前后血清生化指标、抗氧化和免疫性能的变化. 草业学报, 2025, 34(5): 202-211. | |
| [25] | Ding C R, Sun Y Q. Predictive value of combined detection of serum Cys-C, UPCR and serum Cr levels for the prognosis of patients with diabetic nephropathy. Clinical Medical & Engineering, 2024, 31(12): 1519-1520. |
| 丁丛仁, 孙跃琦. 血清Cys-C、UPCR、血清Cr水平联合检测对糖尿病肾病患者预后的预测价值. 临床医学工程, 2024, 31(12): 1519-1520. | |
| [26] | Wang H B, Gu Z Y, Liu Y, et al. Effect of quercetin on growth performance and serum physiological and immuno- antioxidant capacity of early weaned Guangfeng goat lambs.Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2025, 51(1): 90-97. |
| 王海波, 谷志勇, 刘远, 等. 槲皮素对早期断奶广丰山羊羔羊的生长性能和血清生理及免疫抗氧化能力的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 51(1): 90-97. | |
| [27] | Zhan J S, Gu Z Y, Wang H B, et al. Effects of rutin supplementation on growth performance, slaughter performance, serum parameters, and meat quality of Nubian goats. Animal Science Journal, 2023, 94(1): e13819. |
| [28] | Wang H B, Zhan J S, Jia H B, et al. Effects of rumen fermentation level on slaughter performance, antioxidant and immune functions and composition of volatile fatty acids in the intestine of Hu sheep. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2024, 60(7): 263-268. |
| 王海波, 占今舜, 贾浩滨, 等. 瘤胃发酵水平对湖羊屠宰性能、机体抗氧化和免疫功能及肠道挥发性脂肪酸组成的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2024, 60(7): 263-268. | |
| [29] | Zhan J S, Zhan K, Yang F Y, et al. Effects of diet supplemented probiotics on growth performance, blood biochemical indices and rumen fermentation of Nubian goats. China Herbivore Science, 2021, 41(6): 6-12, 23. |
| 占今舜, 詹康, 杨富裕, 等. 饲粮中添加益生菌对努比亚山羊生长性能、血液生化指标和瘤胃发酵的影响. 中国草食动物科学, 2021, 41(6): 6-12, 23. | |
| [30] | Wang C, Huang Y X, Liu Q, et al. Effects of valerate acid on rumen fermentation of Simmental cattle. Feed Industry, 2006, 27(19): 22-24. |
| 王聪, 黄应祥, 刘强, 等. 戊酸对西门塔尔牛瘤胃发酵的影响. 饲料工业, 2006, 27(19): 22-24. | |
| [31] | Zhang Z W, Zhu M X, Wang C F. Effects of isoacids on ruminal metabolism and performance in rumiants: A review. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34(3): 1408-1415. |
| 张振威, 朱明霞, 王长法. 异位酸影响反刍动物瘤胃代谢和生产性能的研究进展. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34(3): 1408-1415. | |
| [32] | Ran H, Zhu S X, Liu T, et al. Effects of Astragalus polysaccharide powder on rumen fermentation parameters and microflora of Hu sheep in vitro. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2025, 37(3): 1880-1892. |
| 冉航, 朱声鑫, 刘婷, 等. 黄芪多糖粉对湖羊瘤胃体外发酵参数和微生物区系的影响. 动物营养学报, 2025, 37(3): 1880-1892. |
| [1] | Hao-bin JIA, Hao-yun JIANG, Ai-hua LI, Hai-bo WANG, Sun-quan LIN, Yue PAN, Jun-hong HUO, Jin-shun ZHAN. Effects of diets with different concentrate-to-roughage ratios on the growth rate, serum biochemical indexes, and rumen fermentation of Guangfeng goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(3): 170-184. |
| [2] | Dong-xu YAO, Cai-zhong WANG, Chen ZHENG. Effects of timothy grass on growth rate, slaughter performance, and meat quality in young meat rabbits [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(3): 185-194. |
| [3] | Dong-ya LIU, Yan YANG, Jing LIU, Bo WANG, Zhi-gang LI. Effects of short-term sheep manure return on soil quality of desert steppe [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(2): 28-39. |
| [4] | Bin FENG, Xiao-xia YANG, Yu-zhen LIU, Wen-ting LIU, Wei-dong LYU, Yan-fen ZHANG, Quan-min DONG. Effects of different livestock classes on species diversity, niches, and interspecific associations in alpine grassland [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(8): 1-14. |
| [5] | Qian XU, Shuai GUO, Liang-liang ZHANG, Zhan-jun WANG, Guo-sheng XIN. Effects of supplemental feeding on growth rate, and serum biochemical and metabolomic parameters of grazing Tan sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 122-138. |
| [6] | Min ZHANG, Rui YANG, Yi-zhou HUANG, Zhi-xin LIN, Xian-yue ZHENG, Qing-hua LIU, Yu-yun GAO, Dong-mei LIN, Zhan-xi LIN, Ling JIN. Effects of Pennisetum giganteum on the growth performance and intestinal health of finishing Congjiang Xiang pigs [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 171-188. |
| [7] | Shuai QI, Yan-li ZHANG, Yong-jie WAN, Wei-qiang NIU, Ji-xin ZHANG, Xue GAO, Da-gan MAO. Effects of soybean straw co-fermented with a bacterium-enzyme mixture on the growth performance, serum indexes, and rumen microorganisms of Hu sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 189-201. |
| [8] | Jin-shun ZHAN, Hao-yun JIANG, Hai-bo WANG, Hao-bin JIA, Yue PAN, Xiao-jun ZHONG, Jun-hong HUO. The changes of serum biochemical indexes, oxidation resistance and immune property in pre- and post-weaning lambs [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 202-211. |
| [9] | Hang-qi HAN, Zi-fan WANG, He DING, Yu-rong CHEN, Qi WANG, Xiao-qing ZHANG. Comparative analysis of effects of oat hay and oat cubes on rumen fermentation and microbial composition in sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 212-222. |
| [10] | Nan GUO, Wu-chen DU, Shou-kun JI, Jian LIU, Su-qian CUI, Hui YUAN, Xu HAN, Ji-shuang LIU, Li-jie GAO. Effects of different fertilization and reseeding rates on the nutrient content of forage in a mountain meadow and its rumen fermentation parameters [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(4): 150-163. |
| [11] | Pan-ping YANG, Hui-xia LI, Ya-mei HU. Exploration of meat quality characteristics of Yanchi Tan sheep and the potential regulatory mechanisms [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(4): 223-232. |
| [12] | Qi LU, Ji-xiao QIN, Yi-ming BAN, Cheng-cheng GAO, Rong YANG, Pei-yao LI, Yi-qing XU, Shuang-long XIE, Rui CHEN, Di ZHOU, Xing-zhou TIAN. Effect of different levels of purple maize anthocyanin extract on in vitro gas production and rumen fermentation in beef cattle [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(10): 202-212. |
| [13] | Sheng-wei JIN, Yin-cang HAN, Yong-gang SUN, Wei-qin DING, Ya-qian LIU, Zeng-yuan QI, Jian-qiang ZHOU. Effects of different feeding methods on growth performance and blood physiological and biochemical indexes of yaks [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(1): 215-225. |
| [14] | Rong GUO, Hai-fei JING, Yi YANG, Guo-sheng XIN, Ting YANG. Effects of nano selenium on growth performance, blood biochemistry and metabolome of Tan sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(9): 199-213. |
| [15] | Li-ping HONG, Xiao-dong LI, Er-ru YU, Cheng-jiang PEI, Yi-shun SHANG, Jin-hong LUO, Guang SUN, Yun-hao ZHOU, Shi-ge LI, Hang YANG, Feng-dan LIU. Effects of different perilla (Perilla frutescens) materials on serum antioxidant enzyme activity, rumen fermentation parameters and microflora of Guizhou black goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(9): 214-226. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||