Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 49-59.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020310
Previous Articles Next Articles
Qiang XU(), Xin-hui TIAN, Wen-hua DU()
Received:
2020-06-30
Revised:
2020-08-31
Online:
2021-07-09
Published:
2021-07-09
Contact:
Wen-hua DU
Qiang XU, Xin-hui TIAN, Wen-hua DU. Effects of mixed sowing of rye and common vetch on forage yield and nutrient quality in alpine pastoral areas[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 49-59.
编号Code | 黑麦Rye | 箭筈豌豆Common vetch |
---|---|---|
B? | 250 | 0.0 |
B? | 320 | 36.8 |
B? | 280 | 55.2 |
B? | 240 | 73.6 |
B? | 200 | 92.0 |
B? | 160 | 110.4 |
B? | 120 | 128.8 |
B? | 80 | 147.2 |
B? | 0 | 115.0 |
Table 1 Seeding rate of rye and common vetch of different mixed ratio (kg·hm-2)
编号Code | 黑麦Rye | 箭筈豌豆Common vetch |
---|---|---|
B? | 250 | 0.0 |
B? | 320 | 36.8 |
B? | 280 | 55.2 |
B? | 240 | 73.6 |
B? | 200 | 92.0 |
B? | 160 | 110.4 |
B? | 120 | 128.8 |
B? | 80 | 147.2 |
B? | 0 | 115.0 |
变异来源 Variation source | 株高Height | 总枝条数No. | 总产量Total yield | FW/HY | CP | NDF | ADF | DMD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH | VH | FW | HY | |||||||
混播组合Mixture combination (C) | 1.71 | 7.61** | 2.75 | 19.89** | 9.98** | 0.53 | 1.27 | 0.38 | 1.80 | 1.80 |
混播比例Mixture ratio (R) | 14.55** | 14.15** | 38.76** | 4.57** | 9.56** | 9.16** | 112.16** | 78.32** | 38.23** | 38.23** |
混播组合×混播比例C×R | 6.43** | 17.34** | 28.55** | 8.80** | 16.34** | 27.78** | 81.67** | 24.65** | 25.08** | 25.08** |
Table 2 Variance analysis on the plant height of rye (RH) and common vetch (VH), total number of branches (No.), total fresh weight (FW), total hay yield (HY), FW/HY and nutrition quality within the mixture combination, mixed ratio and the interaction of mixture combination and mixed ratio
变异来源 Variation source | 株高Height | 总枝条数No. | 总产量Total yield | FW/HY | CP | NDF | ADF | DMD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH | VH | FW | HY | |||||||
混播组合Mixture combination (C) | 1.71 | 7.61** | 2.75 | 19.89** | 9.98** | 0.53 | 1.27 | 0.38 | 1.80 | 1.80 |
混播比例Mixture ratio (R) | 14.55** | 14.15** | 38.76** | 4.57** | 9.56** | 9.16** | 112.16** | 78.32** | 38.23** | 38.23** |
混播组合×混播比例C×R | 6.43** | 17.34** | 28.55** | 8.80** | 16.34** | 27.78** | 81.67** | 24.65** | 25.08** | 25.08** |
混播组合 Mixture combination | 箭筈豌豆的平均株高Average height of common vetch (cm) | 平均鲜草产量 Average fresh weight (t·hm-2) | 平均干草产量 Average hay yield (t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|
A? | 95.40±1.18a | 29.82±1.09a | 7.16±0.29a |
A? | 92.82±1.26a | 27.73±1.14a | 6.81±0.36a |
A? | 89.32±0.85b | 21.34±0.66b | 5.31±0.27b |
Table 3 Differences of the averaged plant height, average fresh weight and average hay yield among the mixture combination
混播组合 Mixture combination | 箭筈豌豆的平均株高Average height of common vetch (cm) | 平均鲜草产量 Average fresh weight (t·hm-2) | 平均干草产量 Average hay yield (t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|
A? | 95.40±1.18a | 29.82±1.09a | 7.16±0.29a |
A? | 92.82±1.26a | 27.73±1.14a | 6.81±0.36a |
A? | 89.32±0.85b | 21.34±0.66b | 5.31±0.27b |
混播比例 Mixed ratio | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 干物质消化率 Dry matter digestibility (DMD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
B? | 8.91±0.11f | 57.94±0.81a | 38.60±0.27a | 58.83±0.21e |
B? | 9.73±0.17f | 57.56±0.42a | 37.53±0.56ab | 59.66±0.44de |
B? | 11.37±0.35e | 56.34±0.90ab | 36.73±0.90ab | 60.29±0.70de |
B? | 12.97±0.33d | 55.21±1.01b | 36.71±0.53ab | 60.30±0.41de |
B? | 13.54±0.25d | 53.99±0.77b | 35.67±0.48b | 61.11±0.38d |
B? | 13.97±0.41d | 54.09±0.64b | 36.38±0.50b | 60.56±0.39d |
B? | 15.02±0.42c | 50.20±0.57c | 33.39±0.86c | 62.89±0.67c |
B? | 16.57±0.56b | 47.35±0.94d | 29.84±1.15d | 65.65±0.90b |
B? | 20.98±0.29a | 36.35±0.69e | 25.27±0.58e | 69.22±0.46a |
Table 4 Effect of mixed ratio on CP, NDF, ADF content and DMD (%)
混播比例 Mixed ratio | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 干物质消化率 Dry matter digestibility (DMD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
B? | 8.91±0.11f | 57.94±0.81a | 38.60±0.27a | 58.83±0.21e |
B? | 9.73±0.17f | 57.56±0.42a | 37.53±0.56ab | 59.66±0.44de |
B? | 11.37±0.35e | 56.34±0.90ab | 36.73±0.90ab | 60.29±0.70de |
B? | 12.97±0.33d | 55.21±1.01b | 36.71±0.53ab | 60.30±0.41de |
B? | 13.54±0.25d | 53.99±0.77b | 35.67±0.48b | 61.11±0.38d |
B? | 13.97±0.41d | 54.09±0.64b | 36.38±0.50b | 60.56±0.39d |
B? | 15.02±0.42c | 50.20±0.57c | 33.39±0.86c | 62.89±0.67c |
B? | 16.57±0.56b | 47.35±0.94d | 29.84±1.15d | 65.65±0.90b |
B? | 20.98±0.29a | 36.35±0.69e | 25.27±0.58e | 69.22±0.46a |
处理 Treatment | 株高Height (cm) | 总枝条数 No. (×104·hm-2) | 产量Yield (t·hm-2) | 鲜干比 FW/HY | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH | VH | FW | HY | |||
A?B? | 167.87±1.31k | — | 478.67±7.51fghij | 27.50±2.70cdefgh | 7.22±0.71cdef | 3.16±0.06n |
A?B? | 168.47±2.00jk | 90.30±1.02fgh | 590.33±15.45a | 32.75±0.33abc | 7.37±0.08bcdef | 3.79±0.07jkl |
A?B? | 173.80±1.34bcdefgh | 96.67±0.96bcd | 515.67±18.67bcdefg | 28.75±0.24cdef | 6.90±0.06defg | 4.17±0.06fgh |
A?B? | 174.50±1.78bcdefg | 95.00±1.04cde | 498.33±30.37ghij | 28.58±1.39cdef | 7.07±0.35cdef | 4.04±0.05hij |
A?B? | 174.23±0.67bcdefg | 100.90±0.84ab | 573.33±19.23hij | 36.75±3.71a | 8.68±0.87ab | 4.23±0.05efgh |
A?B? | 177.33±1.76abc | 98.50±1.39abc | 561.00±24.79abcde | 37.00±3.73a | 9.03±0.50a | 4.42±0.05ef |
A?B? | 170.07±1.10ghijk | 101.57±1.10a | 534.00±15.01abcdef | 27.50±0.77cdefgh | 7.63±0.21bcde | 3.59±0.08lm |
A?B? | 169.57±1.31hijk | 96.20±1.33cde | 556.67±22.67abcd | 28.45±0.43cdef | 6.50±0.10efgh | 4.37±0.08ef |
A?B? | — | 84.07±1.05jk | 260.67±13.32k | 21.08±1.59hij | 4.03±0.53jk | 4.76±0.07d |
A?B? | 169.30±1.08hijk | — | 462.00±19.70hij | 27.67±0.96cdefg | 7.39±0.26bcdef | 3.18±0.03n |
A?B? | 170.40±0.83fghijk | 85.77±1.08ijk | 501.67±19.63defghi | 25.67±0.59defgh | 6.29±0.14efghi | 4.07±0.02ghi |
A?B? | 177.27±1.04abc | 88.37±1.93ghij | 529.33±26.03bcdefg | 29.06±5.51cde | 6.29±0.17efghi | 3.73±0.07klm |
A?B? | 178.33±1.29ab | 96.87±1.40bcd | 470.67±19.19ghij | 26.08±1.59defgh | 8.19±0.50abcd | 3.74±0.06klm |
A?B? | 176.80±1.17abcd | 99.03±2.33abc | 457.00±16.20hij | 26.25±1.69defgh | 8.37±0.53abc | 4.47±0.04e |
A?B? | 179.33±0.87a | 98.47±2.98abc | 542.67±20.80abcde | 35.67±2.31ab | 8.99±0.58a | 3.97±0.02h |
A?B? | 172.57±1.15defghij | 97.43±0.72abcd | 455.00±4.51ij | 31.50±2.12abcd | 7.32±0.49bcdef | 4.31±0.11efg |
A?B? | 168.40±1.63jk | 91.93±0.87efg | 479.67±19.23fghij | 30.33±1.89bcd | 5.65±0.35ghi | 5.34±0.10c |
A?B? | — | 84.67±0.33jk | 220.00±4.36k | 17.33±0.38jk | 2.80±0.06k | 6.19±0.10a |
A?B? | 170.07±1.59ghijk | — | 481.00±11.93fghij | 19.17±1.06ijk | 6.08±0.33fghi | 3.15±0.08n |
A?B? | 172.20±1.94efghijk | 87.00±0.81hij | 516.33±24.85bcdefgh | 23.39±0.49efghij | 6.78±0.14efg | 3.43±0.13m |
A?B? | 171.70±0.81efghijk | 90.20±0.99fgh | 494.67±20.34efghij | 19.08±0.53ijk | 5.25±0.14ij | 3.64±0.09l |
A?B? | 176.20±1.27abcde | 87.80±1.47ghij | 510.00±14.22cdefghi | 26.00±0.39defgh | 6.70±0.62efgh | 3.57±0.10lm |
A?B? | 175.13±2.10abcde | 95.13±1.49cde | 439.00±9.61j | 21.75±1.40ghij | 5.21±0.63ij | 3.83±0.15ijkl |
A?B? | 174.87±1.74abcdef | 93.60±1.71def | 469.00±17.52ghij | 23.75±0.53efghi | 6.01±0.44fghi | 3.70±0.09l |
A?B? | 173.17±1.10cdefghi | 89.20±1.42ghi | 474.00±12.49fghij | 21.61±0.92ghij | 5.36±0.23hi | 4.02±0.07hi |
A?B? | 168.87±0.58ijk | 89.13±0.52ghi | 476.00±13.23fghij | 22.42±1.78fghij | 4.18±0.53jk | 5.36±0.08c |
A?B? | — | 82.47±0.87k | 217.00±4.04k | 15.89±0.22k | 2.87±0.43k | 5.67±0.16b |
Table 5 Differences of the plant height of rye (RH) and common vetch (VH), the total number of branches (No.), total fresh weight (FW), total hay yield (HY) and FW/HY for the interaction of mixture combination and mixed ratio
处理 Treatment | 株高Height (cm) | 总枝条数 No. (×104·hm-2) | 产量Yield (t·hm-2) | 鲜干比 FW/HY | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH | VH | FW | HY | |||
A?B? | 167.87±1.31k | — | 478.67±7.51fghij | 27.50±2.70cdefgh | 7.22±0.71cdef | 3.16±0.06n |
A?B? | 168.47±2.00jk | 90.30±1.02fgh | 590.33±15.45a | 32.75±0.33abc | 7.37±0.08bcdef | 3.79±0.07jkl |
A?B? | 173.80±1.34bcdefgh | 96.67±0.96bcd | 515.67±18.67bcdefg | 28.75±0.24cdef | 6.90±0.06defg | 4.17±0.06fgh |
A?B? | 174.50±1.78bcdefg | 95.00±1.04cde | 498.33±30.37ghij | 28.58±1.39cdef | 7.07±0.35cdef | 4.04±0.05hij |
A?B? | 174.23±0.67bcdefg | 100.90±0.84ab | 573.33±19.23hij | 36.75±3.71a | 8.68±0.87ab | 4.23±0.05efgh |
A?B? | 177.33±1.76abc | 98.50±1.39abc | 561.00±24.79abcde | 37.00±3.73a | 9.03±0.50a | 4.42±0.05ef |
A?B? | 170.07±1.10ghijk | 101.57±1.10a | 534.00±15.01abcdef | 27.50±0.77cdefgh | 7.63±0.21bcde | 3.59±0.08lm |
A?B? | 169.57±1.31hijk | 96.20±1.33cde | 556.67±22.67abcd | 28.45±0.43cdef | 6.50±0.10efgh | 4.37±0.08ef |
A?B? | — | 84.07±1.05jk | 260.67±13.32k | 21.08±1.59hij | 4.03±0.53jk | 4.76±0.07d |
A?B? | 169.30±1.08hijk | — | 462.00±19.70hij | 27.67±0.96cdefg | 7.39±0.26bcdef | 3.18±0.03n |
A?B? | 170.40±0.83fghijk | 85.77±1.08ijk | 501.67±19.63defghi | 25.67±0.59defgh | 6.29±0.14efghi | 4.07±0.02ghi |
A?B? | 177.27±1.04abc | 88.37±1.93ghij | 529.33±26.03bcdefg | 29.06±5.51cde | 6.29±0.17efghi | 3.73±0.07klm |
A?B? | 178.33±1.29ab | 96.87±1.40bcd | 470.67±19.19ghij | 26.08±1.59defgh | 8.19±0.50abcd | 3.74±0.06klm |
A?B? | 176.80±1.17abcd | 99.03±2.33abc | 457.00±16.20hij | 26.25±1.69defgh | 8.37±0.53abc | 4.47±0.04e |
A?B? | 179.33±0.87a | 98.47±2.98abc | 542.67±20.80abcde | 35.67±2.31ab | 8.99±0.58a | 3.97±0.02h |
A?B? | 172.57±1.15defghij | 97.43±0.72abcd | 455.00±4.51ij | 31.50±2.12abcd | 7.32±0.49bcdef | 4.31±0.11efg |
A?B? | 168.40±1.63jk | 91.93±0.87efg | 479.67±19.23fghij | 30.33±1.89bcd | 5.65±0.35ghi | 5.34±0.10c |
A?B? | — | 84.67±0.33jk | 220.00±4.36k | 17.33±0.38jk | 2.80±0.06k | 6.19±0.10a |
A?B? | 170.07±1.59ghijk | — | 481.00±11.93fghij | 19.17±1.06ijk | 6.08±0.33fghi | 3.15±0.08n |
A?B? | 172.20±1.94efghijk | 87.00±0.81hij | 516.33±24.85bcdefgh | 23.39±0.49efghij | 6.78±0.14efg | 3.43±0.13m |
A?B? | 171.70±0.81efghijk | 90.20±0.99fgh | 494.67±20.34efghij | 19.08±0.53ijk | 5.25±0.14ij | 3.64±0.09l |
A?B? | 176.20±1.27abcde | 87.80±1.47ghij | 510.00±14.22cdefghi | 26.00±0.39defgh | 6.70±0.62efgh | 3.57±0.10lm |
A?B? | 175.13±2.10abcde | 95.13±1.49cde | 439.00±9.61j | 21.75±1.40ghij | 5.21±0.63ij | 3.83±0.15ijkl |
A?B? | 174.87±1.74abcdef | 93.60±1.71def | 469.00±17.52ghij | 23.75±0.53efghi | 6.01±0.44fghi | 3.70±0.09l |
A?B? | 173.17±1.10cdefghi | 89.20±1.42ghi | 474.00±12.49fghij | 21.61±0.92ghij | 5.36±0.23hi | 4.02±0.07hi |
A?B? | 168.87±0.58ijk | 89.13±0.52ghi | 476.00±13.23fghij | 22.42±1.78fghij | 4.18±0.53jk | 5.36±0.08c |
A?B? | — | 82.47±0.87k | 217.00±4.04k | 15.89±0.22k | 2.87±0.43k | 5.67±0.16b |
处理 Treatment | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 干物质消化率 Dry matter digestibility (DMD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A?B? | 8.72±0.26l | 57.81±0.23ab | 38.43±0.12abc | 58.97±0.10hij |
A?B? | 9.60±0.13kl | 56.81±0.73abc | 37.18±1.15abcde | 59.94±0.89efghij |
A?B? | 11.89±0.52i | 56.00±0.65abcd | 34.74±0.43fg | 61.84±0.34de |
A?B? | 12.76±0.42ghi | 55.52±0.56abcd | 35.79±0.31cdefg | 61.02±0.24defgh |
A?B? | 13.43±0.23fgh | 53.99±1.99abcde | 35.22±0.59defg | 61.47±0.46defg |
A?B? | 14.05±0.65efg | 54.62±0.57abcd | 36.20±0.44cdefg | 60.70±0.35defgh |
A?B? | 15.09±0.18e | 51.89±0.81def | 31.18±0.56h | 64.61±0.43c |
A?B? | 17.52±0.39c | 48.90±2.62fg | 26.15±0.03ij | 68.53±0.03ab |
A?B? | 21.42±0.57a | 37.97±1.40h | 23.57±1.00j | 70.54±0.78a |
A?B? | 9.09±0.20l | 57.70±1.59ab | 39.28±0.70ab | 58.30±0.54ij |
A?B? | 9.87±0.35kl | 57.32±0.33ab | 37.71±1.24abcdef | 59.52±0.97efghij |
A?B? | 11.61±0.62ij | 55.80±0.87abcd | 39.66±0.65a | 58.01±0.50j |
A?B? | 13.94±0.48efg | 53.91±0.39bcde | 36.75±0.94abcdefg | 60.27±0.74defghij |
A?B? | 14.32±0.38ef | 52.51±0.66cdef | 36.53±0.54bcdefg | 60.45±0.42defghi |
A?B? | 15.11±0.34e | 52.02±0.70def | 37.80±0.98abcde | 59.45±0.76fghij |
A?B? | 16.35±0.39d | 49.76±0.42efg | 34.86±1.53efg | 61.75±1.19def |
A?B? | 17.65±0.49c | 45.54±0.26g | 29.52±0.03h | 65.91±0.03c |
A?B? | 21.34±0.18a | 35.99±1.10h | 26.63±0.67i | 68.16±0.52ab |
A?B? | 8.90±0.13l | 58.55±0.84a | 38.09±0.13abcd | 59.23±0.10ghij |
A?B? | 9.72±0.42kl | 58.30±2.29ab | 37.70±0.89abcdef | 59.53±0.69efghij |
A?B? | 10.62±0.59jk | 57.22±2.84ab | 35.80±1.58cdefg | 61.01±1.23defgh |
A?B? | 12.21±0.32ghi | 56.20±3.22abcd | 37.59±1.23abcdef | 59.62±0.96efghij |
A?B? | 12.86±0.16ghi | 55.46±0.75abcd | 35.28±1.27defg | 61.42±0.99defg |
A?B? | 12.75±0.31ghi | 55.62±0.77abcd | 35.12±0.17defg | 61.54±0.13defg |
A?B? | 13.63±0.27fg | 48.96±0.87fg | 34.13±1.58g | 62.32±1.23d |
A?B? | 14.55±0.60ef | 47.62±0.92g | 33.86±1.02g | 62.53±0.80d |
A?B? | 20.18±0.39b | 35.09±0.65h | 25.60±0.48ij | 68.96±0.37ab |
Table 6 Differences of the contents of CP, NDF, ADF and DMD for the interaction of the mixture combination and mixed ratio (%)
处理 Treatment | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 干物质消化率 Dry matter digestibility (DMD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A?B? | 8.72±0.26l | 57.81±0.23ab | 38.43±0.12abc | 58.97±0.10hij |
A?B? | 9.60±0.13kl | 56.81±0.73abc | 37.18±1.15abcde | 59.94±0.89efghij |
A?B? | 11.89±0.52i | 56.00±0.65abcd | 34.74±0.43fg | 61.84±0.34de |
A?B? | 12.76±0.42ghi | 55.52±0.56abcd | 35.79±0.31cdefg | 61.02±0.24defgh |
A?B? | 13.43±0.23fgh | 53.99±1.99abcde | 35.22±0.59defg | 61.47±0.46defg |
A?B? | 14.05±0.65efg | 54.62±0.57abcd | 36.20±0.44cdefg | 60.70±0.35defgh |
A?B? | 15.09±0.18e | 51.89±0.81def | 31.18±0.56h | 64.61±0.43c |
A?B? | 17.52±0.39c | 48.90±2.62fg | 26.15±0.03ij | 68.53±0.03ab |
A?B? | 21.42±0.57a | 37.97±1.40h | 23.57±1.00j | 70.54±0.78a |
A?B? | 9.09±0.20l | 57.70±1.59ab | 39.28±0.70ab | 58.30±0.54ij |
A?B? | 9.87±0.35kl | 57.32±0.33ab | 37.71±1.24abcdef | 59.52±0.97efghij |
A?B? | 11.61±0.62ij | 55.80±0.87abcd | 39.66±0.65a | 58.01±0.50j |
A?B? | 13.94±0.48efg | 53.91±0.39bcde | 36.75±0.94abcdefg | 60.27±0.74defghij |
A?B? | 14.32±0.38ef | 52.51±0.66cdef | 36.53±0.54bcdefg | 60.45±0.42defghi |
A?B? | 15.11±0.34e | 52.02±0.70def | 37.80±0.98abcde | 59.45±0.76fghij |
A?B? | 16.35±0.39d | 49.76±0.42efg | 34.86±1.53efg | 61.75±1.19def |
A?B? | 17.65±0.49c | 45.54±0.26g | 29.52±0.03h | 65.91±0.03c |
A?B? | 21.34±0.18a | 35.99±1.10h | 26.63±0.67i | 68.16±0.52ab |
A?B? | 8.90±0.13l | 58.55±0.84a | 38.09±0.13abcd | 59.23±0.10ghij |
A?B? | 9.72±0.42kl | 58.30±2.29ab | 37.70±0.89abcdef | 59.53±0.69efghij |
A?B? | 10.62±0.59jk | 57.22±2.84ab | 35.80±1.58cdefg | 61.01±1.23defgh |
A?B? | 12.21±0.32ghi | 56.20±3.22abcd | 37.59±1.23abcdef | 59.62±0.96efghij |
A?B? | 12.86±0.16ghi | 55.46±0.75abcd | 35.28±1.27defg | 61.42±0.99defg |
A?B? | 12.75±0.31ghi | 55.62±0.77abcd | 35.12±0.17defg | 61.54±0.13defg |
A?B? | 13.63±0.27fg | 48.96±0.87fg | 34.13±1.58g | 62.32±1.23d |
A?B? | 14.55±0.60ef | 47.62±0.92g | 33.86±1.02g | 62.53±0.80d |
A?B? | 20.18±0.39b | 35.09±0.65h | 25.60±0.48ij | 68.96±0.37ab |
处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A? | 0.860 | A?B? | 0.444 | A?B? | 0.453 | A?B? | 0.337 |
A? | 0.686 | A?B? | 0.485 | A?B? | 0.375 | A?B? | 0.417 |
A? | 0.057 | A?B? | 0.492 | A?B? | 0.371 | A?B? | 0.305 |
B? | 0.459 | A?B? | 0.504 | A?B? | 0.616 | A?B? | 0.439 |
B? | 0.474 | A?B? | 0.678 | A?B? | 0.645 | A?B? | 0.332 |
B? | 0.422 | A?B? | 0.711 | A?B? | 0.697 | A?B? | 0.410 |
B? | 0.588 | A?B? | 0.650 | A?B? | 0.593 | A?B? | 0.395 |
B? | 0.556 | A?B? | 0.635 | A?B? | 0.526 | A?B? | 0.298 |
B? | 0.691 | A?B? | 0.506 | A?B? | 0.357 | A?B? | 0.372 |
B? | 0.609 | ||||||
B? | 0.565 | ||||||
B? | 0.400 |
Table 7 Comprehensive evaluation values for the single factor and the interaction of mixture combination and mixed ratio
处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A? | 0.860 | A?B? | 0.444 | A?B? | 0.453 | A?B? | 0.337 |
A? | 0.686 | A?B? | 0.485 | A?B? | 0.375 | A?B? | 0.417 |
A? | 0.057 | A?B? | 0.492 | A?B? | 0.371 | A?B? | 0.305 |
B? | 0.459 | A?B? | 0.504 | A?B? | 0.616 | A?B? | 0.439 |
B? | 0.474 | A?B? | 0.678 | A?B? | 0.645 | A?B? | 0.332 |
B? | 0.422 | A?B? | 0.711 | A?B? | 0.697 | A?B? | 0.410 |
B? | 0.588 | A?B? | 0.650 | A?B? | 0.593 | A?B? | 0.395 |
B? | 0.556 | A?B? | 0.635 | A?B? | 0.526 | A?B? | 0.298 |
B? | 0.691 | A?B? | 0.506 | A?B? | 0.357 | A?B? | 0.372 |
B? | 0.609 | ||||||
B? | 0.565 | ||||||
B? | 0.400 |
1 | Zheng Y S. Development demand analysis of irrigation system for forage land in pasture areas of Gansu Province. China Water Resources, 2015, 783(21): 47-48. |
郑永山. 甘肃省牧区灌溉饲草料地发展需求分析. 中国水利, 2015, 783(21): 47-48. | |
2 | Song Q, Tian X H, Du W H. Studies on production performance of new triticale lines in alpine pastoral areas of Gansu. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(7): 1367-1374. |
宋谦, 田新会, 杜文华. 甘肃省高寒牧区小黑麦新品系的生产性能. 草业科学, 2016, 33(7): 1367-1374. | |
3 | Ren Y X, Liu H C, Tian X H, et al. Response of the autumn sown triticale to the nitrogen fertilizing rate and seeding density in the alpine grazing area of Gannan. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019(4): 1044-1051. |
任昱鑫, 刘汉成, 田新会, 等. 甘南高寒牧区秋播小黑麦对氮肥施用量和播种密度的响应. 草地学报, 2019(4): 1044-1051. | |
4 | Ma Y Q. Study on mixed sowing mode of annual grass-legume artificial grassland and yield formation mechanism in alpine region. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019. |
马妍琪. 高寒地区一年生禾本科-豆科人工草地混播模式及产量形成机制研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019. | |
5 | Li C X, Ye R R, Zhou Y B, et al. Evaluation on production performance and nutritive value of oat and common vetch mixture in alpine pastoral region. Grassland and Turf, 2016, 36(5): 40-45. |
李春喜, 叶润蓉, 周玉碧, 等. 高寒牧区燕麦与箭筈豌豆混播生产性能及营养价值评价. 草原与草坪, 2016, 36(5): 40-45. | |
6 | Guo X, Guo L X, Liu D B, et al. Analysis on yield and quality of smooth brome under single and mixed sowing. China Herbivore Science, 2018, 38(5): 62-65. |
郭孝, 郭良兴, 刘党标, 等. 无芒雀麦在单播及混播下牧草产量和品质的分析. 中国草食动物科学, 2018, 38(5): 62-65. | |
7 | Ma C H, Zhang L, Han J G. Comparison trial on cultivated annual forage and crop in high-cold area. Journal of Sichuan Grassland, 2000(3): 17-22. |
马春晖, 张玲, 韩建国. 高寒地区一年生牧草饲料作物引种评比试验. 四川草原, 2000(3): 17-22. | |
8 | Ma J, Zheng W, Zhang B, et al. Production performance evaluation of oat-common vetch mixed pasture based on nutrient needs of horses. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(6): 1002-1009. |
马军, 郑伟, 张博, 等. 基于马营养需求的燕麦-箭筈豌豆混播草地生产性能的评价. 草业科学, 2015, 32(6): 1002-1009. | |
9 | Wang D, Wang J J, Li L H, et al. Forage yield and interspecific competition of mixed sowing of alfalfa and wheatgrass under dry farming. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(5): 27-31. |
王丹, 王俊杰, 李凌浩, 等. 旱作条件下苜蓿与冰草不同混播方式的产草量及种间竞争关系. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(5): 27-31. | |
10 | Shi Y H, Fu Y K. Study on community stability of mixed pastures in semi-desert area of Gansu. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2000, 9(3): 1-7. |
石永红, 符义坤. 半荒漠地区绿洲混播牧草群落稳定性与调控研究. 草业学报, 2000, 9(3): 1-7. | |
11 | Zhang Y L, Wang J L, Hu Z Z. Interspecific competition and community stability of variegated alfalfa+awnless brome mixture. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2007, 15(1): 43-49. |
张永亮, 王建丽, 胡自治. 杂花苜蓿与无芒雀麦混播群落种间竞争及稳定性. 草地学报, 2007, 15(1): 43-49. | |
12 | Zhao F Y, Du W H, Qu G P, et al. Studies on the production performance and nutritional value of new rye line C32 in pastoral areas of Tibet. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020(1): 279-284. |
赵方媛, 杜文华, 曲广鹏, 等. 黑麦新品系C32在西藏牧区的生产性能和营养价值研究. 草地学报, 2020(1): 279-284. | |
13 | Yun X J. The illustrated handbook of main cultivated forages of China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2008: 7. |
贠旭疆. 中国主要优良栽培草种图鉴. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008: 7. | |
14 | Guo J W, Tian X H, Du W H. Studies on seed yield and components of rye. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(4): 20-25. |
郭建文, 田新会, 杜文华. 黑麦种子产量及其构成因素研究. 甘肃农业科技, 2017(4): 20-25. | |
15 | Wang X, Zeng Z H, Hu Y G. Effect of oat intercropped with common vetch on aftercrop yield. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2009, 17(1): 63-67. |
王旭, 曾昭海, 胡跃高. 燕麦间作箭筈豌豆效应对后作产量的影响. 草地学报, 2009, 17(1): 63-67. | |
16 | Shi Y H, Wang Y Q, Gao X Z, et al. Studies on mixed-sown of annual forage and feed crops in agro-pastoral transitional zone in Northern Shanxi Province. Fuzhou: Agro-grassland Development Forum Online, 2008: 11. |
石永红, 王运琦, 高新中, 等. 雁门关农牧交错带一年生牧草及饲料作物产草量研究. 福州: 农区草业论坛, 2008: 11. | |
17 | Dhima K V, Lithourgidis A S, Vasilakoglou I B. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research, 2007, 100(2/3): 249-256. |
18 | Zhang X Y. Effects of planting density on physiology, stem characteristics, yield and quality of winter rye. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2019. |
张雪悦. 种植密度对越冬型黑麦生理、茎秆特性及产量品质的影响研究. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2019. | |
19 | Meng X J, Han T H, Wu H J, et al. Study on the optimal harvest time of Scale cereal ‘Ganyin No.1’ in cold regions of Tianzhu County. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(4): 876-881. |
孟祥君, 韩天虎, 武慧娟, 等. 甘引1号黑麦在天祝县高寒区的最佳刈割期. 草业科学, 2018, 35(4): 876-881. | |
20 | Meng X J, Yu L P, Zhang S P, et al. Evaluation on the adaptation of ‘Ganyin No.1’ in alpine area. Grassland and Turf, 2017(6): 72-77. |
孟祥君, 俞联平, 张少平, 等. 甘引1号黑麦在高寒地区的适应性评价. 草原与草坪, 2017(6): 72-77. | |
21 | Liu J, La D, Wu J X, et al. Effects of cold, drought and combined stresses on the physiological characteristics of Secale cereale seedling. Plateau Science Research, 2017, 1(1): 57-66. |
刘杰, 拉多, 武俊喜, 等. 低温干旱复合胁迫对两个黑麦品种幼苗生理特性的影响. 高原科学研究, 2017, 1(1): 57-66. | |
22 | Yang Y W, Ou X J, Du T, et al. Cytogenetic analysis and identification of resistance to head blight of triticum-secale-thinopyrum trigeneric hybrid progenies. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2018(4): 492-496, 518. |
杨友伟, 欧雪洁, 杜婷, 等. 小麦-黑麦-偃麦草三属杂种后代细胞遗传学及赤霉病抗性鉴定. 河南农业大学学报, 2018(4): 492-496, 518. | |
23 | Guo J W, Tian X H, Zhang S Y, et al. Effect of different chlorocholine chlorid (CCC) concentrations on lodging resistance and seed yield of rye. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(5): 1128-1137. |
郭建文, 田新会, 张舒芸, 等. 不同浓度矮壮素对黑麦抗倒伏性和种子产量的影响. 草业科学, 2018, 35(5): 1128-1137. | |
24 | Liu H C, Tian X H, Du W H. Structural characteristics of the inflorescence and grain traits of triticale and rye corn. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(7): 120-132. |
刘汉成, 田新会, 杜文华. 小黑麦与黑麦花序结构和籽粒特性比较. 草业学报, 2018, 27(7): 120-132. | |
25 | Liu H C, Tian X H, Du W H. Comparison on structural features of second internodes at base of main stem between triticale and rye. Grassland and Turf, 2018, 38(3): 56-61. |
刘汉成, 田新会, 杜文华. 小黑麦和黑麦主茎基部第2节间解剖结构特征比较. 草原与草坪, 2018, 38(3): 56-61. | |
26 | Fu X N, Pan Z W, Meng X J, et al. The study for mix-sowing of Secale cereal L. ‘Ganyin No.1’ and Avena sativa L. to the alpine area in Tianzhu County. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2016, 35(3): 14-16. |
富新年, 潘正武, 孟祥君, 等. 天祝高寒地区甘引1号黑麦+燕麦混播试验研究. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2016, 35(3): 14-16. | |
27 | Shao X Q. Mixplanting experiment on two new varieties of peas with 70-rye and oat. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2000, 35(3): 320-325. |
邵新庆. 两个新品种豌豆与冬牧70黑麦燕麦混播试验. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2000, 35(3): 320-325. | |
28 | Chen B S. Forage and crop cultivation. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2001. |
陈宝书. 牧草饲料作物栽培学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001. | |
29 | GB/T 30395-2013. The technical regulations for herbage variety registration. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2013. |
GB/T 30395-2013. 草品种审定技术规程. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013. | |
30 | Dai H L. Study on yield and nutritional quality of food-type triticale in Gannan area. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(2): 66-72. |
代寒凌. 甘南地区饲用型小黑麦草产量及营养品质研究. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(2): 66-72. | |
31 | Yang X, Li J H. Study on the seed production on different sowing date of Vicia sativa in Dazi of Tibet. China Herbivore Science, 2013, 33(5): 37-39. |
杨晓, 李锦华. 西藏达孜箭筈豌豆不同播种期种子生产性能研究. 中国草食动物科学, 2013, 33(5): 37-39. | |
32 | Li D M, Tian X H, Du W H. Studies on the forage yield and nutritional value of new triticale lines. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(6): 1164-1169. |
李冬梅, 田新会, 杜文华. 小黑麦新品系的草产量及营养价值研究. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1164-1169. | |
33 | Wang X, Zeng Z H, Hu Y G, et al. Progress and prospect on mixture of gramineae herbage and leguminosae herbage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007, 29(4): 92-98. |
王旭, 曾昭海, 胡跃高, 等. 豆科与禾本科牧草混播效应研究进展. 中国草地学报, 2007, 29(4): 92-98. | |
34 | Zhao H X, Zhu Z L, Zhang Y L, et al. Progress of research in mixed-seeding meadow. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 21(11): 38-41, 49. |
赵海新, 朱占林, 张永亮, 等. 混播草地之研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(11): 38-41, 49. | |
35 | Zhou Q P. The yield and shrub layer and herbage layer of mixture of oat and pea. Grassland and Turf, 2002(3): 43-45. |
周青平. 燕麦+箭筈豌豆混播草地的草层结构与产量. 草原与草坪, 2002(3): 43-45. | |
36 | Gou W L, Li P, Zhang J B, et al. Study on the dynamics of above-ground biomass and nutritive value of annual ryegrass and common vetch mixtures. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(2): 198-206. |
苟文龙, 李平, 张建波, 等. 多花黑麦草+箭筈豌豆混播草地地上生物量和营养品质动态研究. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 198-206. | |
37 | Luo C Y, Zhao L, Zhao X Q, et al. Screening of seeding ratio of common vetch and oat mixture in Qinghai Lake Area. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(1): 95-99. |
罗彩云, 赵亮, 赵新全, 等. 青海湖地区燕麦与箭筈豌豆最佳混播比例的筛选. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(1): 95-99. | |
38 | Wu S J. Effect of mixed seeding alfalfa with smooth bromegrass and crested wheat grass. Chinese Journal of Grassland,2010, 32(2): 15-18, 46. |
吴姝菊. 紫花苜蓿与无芒雀麦、扁穗冰草混播效果研究. 中国草地学报, 2010, 32(2): 15-18, 46. | |
39 | Wang F Q, Xiang J, Guo B G, et al. Effects of mixed sowing ratio, nitrogen application and irrigation on biomass//Proceedings of annual conference in 2017 by the Chinese grassland society. Guangzhou: Chinese Grassland Society, 2017. |
王富强, 向洁, 郭宝光, 等. 拉萨河谷区豆禾牧草混播比例、施氮、灌溉对生物量的影响//中国草学会2017中国草学会年会论文集. 广州: 中国草学会, 2017. | |
40 | Zhao F Y, Qu G P, Tian X H, et al. Yield and nutritional value evaluation of food-type triticale lines. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(6): 1374-1381. |
赵方媛, 曲广鹏, 田新会, 等. 饲料型小黑麦品系籽粒产量及其营养价值研究. 草地学报, 2018, 26(6): 1374-1381. |
[1] | Hui-li WU, Wei TIAN, Yan-ling JI, Lai-qing LOU, Qing-sheng CAI. Screening for plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria that promote cadmium absorption and accumulation and their effects on annual ryegrass [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 53-61. |
[2] | Yi XIAO, Zhong-fu YANG, Gang NIE, Jia-ting HAN, Yang SHUAI, Xin-quan ZHANG. Multi-trait evaluation of yield and nutritive value of 12 Lolium multiflorum varieties or lines in Chengdu Plain [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 174-185. |
[3] | ZHOU Han-yang, SUN Peng-yue, YU Xin-rong, ZHOU Yu, ZHANG Zhi-wei, GAO Jin-zhu, ZHAO Dong-hao, LUO Yi-lan, HU Tian-ming, FU Juan-juan. Protective effects of Flavobacterium succinicans on perennial ryegrass under shade stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 137-143. |
[4] | SHEN Wu-yan, FENG Zheng-jun, QIN Wen-fang, FAN Yuan. Effects of saline-alkali stress on the growth and ion micro-distribution of ryegrass plants [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(2): 52-63. |
[5] | MA Bi-hua, LIN Wei-hu, GAO Min, WANG Xing-di, TIAN Pei. Effects of salicylic acid and Epichloё on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(1): 135-144. |
[6] | ZHANG Xue-yue, ZUO Shi-yu, TIAN Li-xin, LI Li-jie, REN Xiao-song, LIU Zhao-yue, LI Jing. Effect of planting density on photosynthetic performance and yield of winter rye [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(3): 131-141. |
[7] | WANG Ri-ming, WANG Zhi-qiang, XIANG Zuo-xiang. Effect of γ-aminobutyric acid on photosynthetic characteristics and carbohydrate metabolism under high temperature stress in perennial ryegrass [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(2): 168-178. |
[8] | DENG Jie, LI Fang, DUAN Ting-yu. Effects of AM fungus and grass endophyte on the infection of Lolium perenne by the pathogen Bipolaris sorokinianum in a greenhouse [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(12): 103-113. |
[9] | DAI Han-ling, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua, WU Jian-ping. Effects of silage additives on nutritional quality and silage quality of triticale and rye [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(12): 211-219. |
[10] | LIU Han-cheng, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Structural characteristics of the inflorescence and grain traits of triticale and rye corn [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(7): 120-132. |
[11] | LI Lei-lei, HUA Deng-feng, ZHENG Xing-wei, LI Cong. Effects of moisture content and sowing-mix ratio on the quality of baled oat and common vetch/hairy vetch silage mixtures in the pastoral area of southern Qinghai [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(7): 166-174. |
[12] | SONG Dan-dan, HE Bing-hui, LUO Song-ping, WU Yao-peng. The effects of ryegrass and biochar on soil nutrient distribution in Karst area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(4): 195-201. |
[13] | LI Jin-bo, LI Shi-gang, SONG Gui-long, PUYANG Xue-hua, XUE Bo-han. Arsenic absorption characteristics and relationships between arsenic absorption and nutrient accumulation in stems and leaves of two ryegrass species under arsenic stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(2): 79-87. |
[14] | WANG Xue-Chun, WANG Hong-Ni, HUANG Jing, YANG Guo-Tao, HU Yun-Gao. Simulation of soil moisture dynamics and ryegrass growth in the hilly region of Sichuan Province using the environmental policy integrated climate model [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(9): 1-13. |
[15] | LIANG Zhi-Ting, DENG Jian-Qiang, WANG Zi-Kui, SHEN Yu-Ying, WANG Xian-Zhi. Differences in soil bacterial community composition among three forage-crop rotations on the Longdong Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(8): 180-191. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||