Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 173-184.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2024379
Received:2024-09-27
Revised:2024-10-31
Online:2025-09-20
Published:2025-07-02
Jiu YUAN. A study of the feed associative effects of mung bean, garlic and eggplant peels when combined with maize straw silage and feed concentrate[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(9): 173-184.
| 类型Type | TP (h) | 0∶100 | 25∶75 | 50∶50 | 75∶25 | 100∶0 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣∶青贮 MBP∶CSS | 12 | 10.25±2.42b | 30.50±2.94a | 29.50±3.54a | 32.00±2.83a | 32.50±0.71a | 0.017 |
| 24 | 15.55±1.95b | 37.00±3.49a | 33.00±2.83a | 33.00±1.41a | 35.00±1.41a | 0.017 | |
| 48 | 19.75±3.02b | 39.00±3.90a | 38.00±1.41a | 36.00±2.83a | 40.00±0.80a | 0.013 | |
| 72 | 22.00±2.70B | 49.00±2.83A | 44.00±1.41A | 44.00±2.66A | 47.00±2.83A | 0.001 | |
大蒜皮∶青贮 Garlic peel∶CSS | 12 | 10.25±2.42c | 28.00±2.83a | 22.50±3.60ab | 25.50±0.71ab | 12.25±1.06bc | 0.023 |
| 24 | 15.55±1.95C | 28.00±2.83B | 26.75±2.60B | 38.00±2.83A | 14.25±1.77C | <0.001 | |
| 48 | 19.75±3.02C | 32.00±1.41B | 29.75±0.35B | 54.25±0.35A | 15.50±2.12C | <0.001 | |
| 72 | 22.00±2.70C | 39.00±1.41B | 29.75±0.35C | 59.25±3.01A | 15.50±2.12D | <0.001 | |
茄子皮∶青贮 EP∶CSS | 12 | 10.25±2.42C | 20.17±3.65B | 35.33±2.31A | 34.00±1.00A | 35.00±1.41A | <0.001 |
| 24 | 15.55±1.95C | 23.00±3.50B | 35.33±2.31A | 39.33±3.51A | 42.75±3.30A | 0.001 | |
| 48 | 19.75±3.02C | 26.50±2.27B | 37.67±1.60A | 43.50±2.09A | 47.50±3.78A | <0.001 | |
| 72 | 22.00±2.70C | 28.50±2.59B | 41.17±0.76A | 47.33±3.50A | 50.50±3.54A | <0.001 |
Table 1 Gas production at different time points after in vitro cultivation of vegetable waste and corn straw silage with different ratios (mL)
| 类型Type | TP (h) | 0∶100 | 25∶75 | 50∶50 | 75∶25 | 100∶0 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣∶青贮 MBP∶CSS | 12 | 10.25±2.42b | 30.50±2.94a | 29.50±3.54a | 32.00±2.83a | 32.50±0.71a | 0.017 |
| 24 | 15.55±1.95b | 37.00±3.49a | 33.00±2.83a | 33.00±1.41a | 35.00±1.41a | 0.017 | |
| 48 | 19.75±3.02b | 39.00±3.90a | 38.00±1.41a | 36.00±2.83a | 40.00±0.80a | 0.013 | |
| 72 | 22.00±2.70B | 49.00±2.83A | 44.00±1.41A | 44.00±2.66A | 47.00±2.83A | 0.001 | |
大蒜皮∶青贮 Garlic peel∶CSS | 12 | 10.25±2.42c | 28.00±2.83a | 22.50±3.60ab | 25.50±0.71ab | 12.25±1.06bc | 0.023 |
| 24 | 15.55±1.95C | 28.00±2.83B | 26.75±2.60B | 38.00±2.83A | 14.25±1.77C | <0.001 | |
| 48 | 19.75±3.02C | 32.00±1.41B | 29.75±0.35B | 54.25±0.35A | 15.50±2.12C | <0.001 | |
| 72 | 22.00±2.70C | 39.00±1.41B | 29.75±0.35C | 59.25±3.01A | 15.50±2.12D | <0.001 | |
茄子皮∶青贮 EP∶CSS | 12 | 10.25±2.42C | 20.17±3.65B | 35.33±2.31A | 34.00±1.00A | 35.00±1.41A | <0.001 |
| 24 | 15.55±1.95C | 23.00±3.50B | 35.33±2.31A | 39.33±3.51A | 42.75±3.30A | 0.001 | |
| 48 | 19.75±3.02C | 26.50±2.27B | 37.67±1.60A | 43.50±2.09A | 47.50±3.78A | <0.001 | |
| 72 | 22.00±2.70C | 28.50±2.59B | 41.17±0.76A | 47.33±3.50A | 50.50±3.54A | <0.001 |
类型 Type | 配比 Ratio | 快速产气部分 Rapid GP (a, mL) | 缓慢产气部分 Slow GP (b, mL) | 缓慢产气常数 Constant of b (c, %·h-1) | 潜在产气部分 Potential GP (a+b, mL) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣∶青贮 MBP∶CSS | 0∶100 | -1.96±0.29B | 17.33±4.52a | 0.4549±0.0095a | 11.00±3.78B | 6.63±0.04A |
| 25∶75 | 28.30±3.15A | 43.92±5.19a | 0.3144±0.0065a | 72.22±4.03A | 5.98±0.15B | |
| 50∶50 | 27.85±3.70A | 30.86±0.51a | 0.0009±0.0003b | 58.71±4.23A | 6.06±0.10B | |
| 75∶25 | 30.48±2.18A | 37.10±4.24a | 0.0006±0.0001b | 67.57±5.42A | 6.09±0.03B | |
| 100∶0 | 30.83±0.47A | 33.37±4.93a | 0.0006±0.0001b | 63.13±3.90A | 5.98±0.07B | |
| P | 0.0020 | 0.2520 | 0.0270 | 0.0080 | <0.0001 | |
大蒜皮∶青贮 Garlic peel∶CSS | 0∶100 | -6.85±0.99c | 8.35±3.19B | 0.4502±0.0573A | 5.69±0.73B | 6.61±0.01a |
| 25∶75 | 20.53±3.00ab | 27.75±4.74B | 0.0005±0.0002B | 48.28±5.74A | 6.02±0.04b | |
| 50∶50 | 26.65±3.23a | 26.17±5.42B | 0.0139±0.0019B | 52.81±4.65A | 6.23±0.32ab | |
| 75∶25 | 5.38±1.78bc | 60.78±6.62A | 0.0355±0.0150B | 55.42±3.35A | 6.01±0.11b | |
| 100∶0 | 1.25±0.72c | 13.68±4.90B | 0.0454±0.0285B | 14.93±2.32B | 6.33±0.21ab | |
| P | 0.0210 | 0.0060 | 0.0060 | 0.0080 | 0.0390 | |
茄子皮∶青贮 EP∶CSS | 0∶100 | -6.85±0.99C | 17.33±1.51a | 0.4502±0.0574A | 10.99±3.78C | 6.63±0.04A |
| 25∶75 | 20.66±2.09B | 21.33±2.63a | 0.0159±0.0016B | 36.83±4.48B | 6.08±0.06C | |
| 50∶50 | 34.56±2.60A | 27.63±1.09a | 0.0003±0.0001B | 62.19±2.02A | 5.93±0.07D | |
| 75∶25 | 30.39±1.05A | 20.48±3.56a | 0.0213±0.0021B | 48.18±4.57B | 5.96±0.08CD | |
| 100∶0 | 30.53±0.01A | 30.99±3.98a | 0.0146±0.0018B | 61.52±4.99A | 6.28±0.05B | |
| P | <0.0001 | 0.1650 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Table 2 Gas production parameters and pH after in vitro cultivation of vegetable waste and corn straw silage with different ratios
类型 Type | 配比 Ratio | 快速产气部分 Rapid GP (a, mL) | 缓慢产气部分 Slow GP (b, mL) | 缓慢产气常数 Constant of b (c, %·h-1) | 潜在产气部分 Potential GP (a+b, mL) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣∶青贮 MBP∶CSS | 0∶100 | -1.96±0.29B | 17.33±4.52a | 0.4549±0.0095a | 11.00±3.78B | 6.63±0.04A |
| 25∶75 | 28.30±3.15A | 43.92±5.19a | 0.3144±0.0065a | 72.22±4.03A | 5.98±0.15B | |
| 50∶50 | 27.85±3.70A | 30.86±0.51a | 0.0009±0.0003b | 58.71±4.23A | 6.06±0.10B | |
| 75∶25 | 30.48±2.18A | 37.10±4.24a | 0.0006±0.0001b | 67.57±5.42A | 6.09±0.03B | |
| 100∶0 | 30.83±0.47A | 33.37±4.93a | 0.0006±0.0001b | 63.13±3.90A | 5.98±0.07B | |
| P | 0.0020 | 0.2520 | 0.0270 | 0.0080 | <0.0001 | |
大蒜皮∶青贮 Garlic peel∶CSS | 0∶100 | -6.85±0.99c | 8.35±3.19B | 0.4502±0.0573A | 5.69±0.73B | 6.61±0.01a |
| 25∶75 | 20.53±3.00ab | 27.75±4.74B | 0.0005±0.0002B | 48.28±5.74A | 6.02±0.04b | |
| 50∶50 | 26.65±3.23a | 26.17±5.42B | 0.0139±0.0019B | 52.81±4.65A | 6.23±0.32ab | |
| 75∶25 | 5.38±1.78bc | 60.78±6.62A | 0.0355±0.0150B | 55.42±3.35A | 6.01±0.11b | |
| 100∶0 | 1.25±0.72c | 13.68±4.90B | 0.0454±0.0285B | 14.93±2.32B | 6.33±0.21ab | |
| P | 0.0210 | 0.0060 | 0.0060 | 0.0080 | 0.0390 | |
茄子皮∶青贮 EP∶CSS | 0∶100 | -6.85±0.99C | 17.33±1.51a | 0.4502±0.0574A | 10.99±3.78C | 6.63±0.04A |
| 25∶75 | 20.66±2.09B | 21.33±2.63a | 0.0159±0.0016B | 36.83±4.48B | 6.08±0.06C | |
| 50∶50 | 34.56±2.60A | 27.63±1.09a | 0.0003±0.0001B | 62.19±2.02A | 5.93±0.07D | |
| 75∶25 | 30.39±1.05A | 20.48±3.56a | 0.0213±0.0021B | 48.18±4.57B | 5.96±0.08CD | |
| 100∶0 | 30.53±0.01A | 30.99±3.98a | 0.0146±0.0018B | 61.52±4.99A | 6.28±0.05B | |
| P | <0.0001 | 0.1650 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
| 类型Type | TP (h) | 25∶75 | 50∶50 | 75∶25 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣∶青贮 MBP∶CSS | 12 | 115.23±8.55a | 75.95±8.69b | 31.73±6.64b | 0.015 |
| 24 | 165.07±9.79A | 67.09±4.32B | 29.20±5.53B | 0.008 | |
| 48 | 145.02±10.20A | 66.42±6.19B | 21.01±4.51B | 0.003 | |
| 72 | 178.67±6.09A | 68.15±5.40B | 26.62±5.28B | 0.006 | |
大蒜皮∶青贮 Garlic peel∶CSS | 12 | 76.54±7.94b | 92.14±7.92ab | 119.48±5.04a | 0.024 |
| 24 | 65.26±4.77B | 76.27±6.70B | 135.09±10.79A | 0.003 | |
| 48 | 77.04±3.48B | 65.28±1.96B | 141.11±1.57A | 0.002 | |
| 72 | 88.89±5.02B | 67.33±1.08B | 148.89±11.36A | 0.007 | |
茄子皮∶青贮 EP∶CSS | 12 | 64.67±6.15b | 93.31±9.65a | 45.97±4.29b | 0.033 |
| 24 | 70.69±7.07b | 89.60±8.09a | 56.44±8.22b | 0.041 | |
| 48 | 80.63±5.54ab | 94.96±7.04a | 53.78±5.94b | 0.036 | |
| 72 | 73.60±5.83b | 92.73±3.20a | 64.80±6.20b | 0.045 |
Table 3 Associative effects after in vitro cultivation of vegetable waste and corn straw silage with different ratios (%)
| 类型Type | TP (h) | 25∶75 | 50∶50 | 75∶25 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣∶青贮 MBP∶CSS | 12 | 115.23±8.55a | 75.95±8.69b | 31.73±6.64b | 0.015 |
| 24 | 165.07±9.79A | 67.09±4.32B | 29.20±5.53B | 0.008 | |
| 48 | 145.02±10.20A | 66.42±6.19B | 21.01±4.51B | 0.003 | |
| 72 | 178.67±6.09A | 68.15±5.40B | 26.62±5.28B | 0.006 | |
大蒜皮∶青贮 Garlic peel∶CSS | 12 | 76.54±7.94b | 92.14±7.92ab | 119.48±5.04a | 0.024 |
| 24 | 65.26±4.77B | 76.27±6.70B | 135.09±10.79A | 0.003 | |
| 48 | 77.04±3.48B | 65.28±1.96B | 141.11±1.57A | 0.002 | |
| 72 | 88.89±5.02B | 67.33±1.08B | 148.89±11.36A | 0.007 | |
茄子皮∶青贮 EP∶CSS | 12 | 64.67±6.15b | 93.31±9.65a | 45.97±4.29b | 0.033 |
| 24 | 70.69±7.07b | 89.60±8.09a | 56.44±8.22b | 0.041 | |
| 48 | 80.63±5.54ab | 94.96±7.04a | 53.78±5.94b | 0.036 | |
| 72 | 73.60±5.83b | 92.73±3.20a | 64.80±6.20b | 0.045 |
| 类型Type | TP (h) | 100∶0 | 80∶20 | 70∶30 | 60∶40 | 50∶50 | 0∶100 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣混合粗料∶ 精料MR of MBP∶concentrate | 12 | 5.60±3.39b | 5.75±1.06b | 16.75±1.06a | 12.00±2.12a | 11.00±4.24a | 15.00±0.71a | 0.014 |
| 24 | 6.10±4.10B | 9.25±3.89B | 34.25±2.83A | 20.00±3.54AB | 25.25±5.30AB | 36.25±3.30A | 0.003 | |
| 48 | 23.00±0.00b | 17.50±3.54b | 49.75±3.18a | 26.25±4.60b | 41.75±5.96a | 46.75±4.72a | 0.016 | |
| 72 | 32.25±3.08b | 35.00±3.34b | 52.25±5.03a | 34.50±3.07b | 48.50±2.12a | 51.50±2.02a | 0.041 | |
大蒜皮混合粗料∶ 精料MR of garlic peel∶concentrate | 12 | 4.25±1.60c | 17.75±0.35ab | 17.50±2.12ab | 10.25±0.35bc | 15.75±3.89ab | 18.75±4.60a | 0.023 |
| 24 | 6.00±2.12b | 31.25±1.77a | 33.50±0.71a | 29.75±1.77a | 26.50±7.67a | 41.75±6.01a | 0.041 | |
| 48 | 6.50±1.41b | 31.50±1.41a | 38.50±7.78a | 45.25±3.89a | 29.50±4.14a | 49.00±5.90a | 0.015 | |
| 72 | 8.50±1.41C | 32.25±1.06B | 42.70±3.18AB | 53.00±4.95A | 31.25±4.50B | 50.75±7.42A | 0.005 | |
茄子皮混合粗料∶ 精料MR of EP∶concentrate | 12 | 19.50±0.50a | 16.50±2.12a | 18.50±5.47a | 16.00±4.24a | 14.50±6.36a | 13.83±2.08a | 0.408 |
| 24 | 40.50±1.41a | 30.75±5.20a | 38.50±7.36a | 42.50±2.12a | 27.50±17.68a | 34.50±4.82a | 0.662 | |
| 48 | 44.75±0.35a | 48.75±6.05a | 43.00±8.25a | 50.75±8.25a | 45.75±10.96a | 46.67±7.93a | 0.997 | |
| 72 | 47.25±0.35a | 50.25±6.17a | 43.50±7.33a | 51.50±9.19a | 49.75±9.55a | 47.00±7.49a | 0.998 |
Table 4 Gas production at different time points after in vitro cultivation of different ratios of mixed roughage and concentrate (mL)
| 类型Type | TP (h) | 100∶0 | 80∶20 | 70∶30 | 60∶40 | 50∶50 | 0∶100 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣混合粗料∶ 精料MR of MBP∶concentrate | 12 | 5.60±3.39b | 5.75±1.06b | 16.75±1.06a | 12.00±2.12a | 11.00±4.24a | 15.00±0.71a | 0.014 |
| 24 | 6.10±4.10B | 9.25±3.89B | 34.25±2.83A | 20.00±3.54AB | 25.25±5.30AB | 36.25±3.30A | 0.003 | |
| 48 | 23.00±0.00b | 17.50±3.54b | 49.75±3.18a | 26.25±4.60b | 41.75±5.96a | 46.75±4.72a | 0.016 | |
| 72 | 32.25±3.08b | 35.00±3.34b | 52.25±5.03a | 34.50±3.07b | 48.50±2.12a | 51.50±2.02a | 0.041 | |
大蒜皮混合粗料∶ 精料MR of garlic peel∶concentrate | 12 | 4.25±1.60c | 17.75±0.35ab | 17.50±2.12ab | 10.25±0.35bc | 15.75±3.89ab | 18.75±4.60a | 0.023 |
| 24 | 6.00±2.12b | 31.25±1.77a | 33.50±0.71a | 29.75±1.77a | 26.50±7.67a | 41.75±6.01a | 0.041 | |
| 48 | 6.50±1.41b | 31.50±1.41a | 38.50±7.78a | 45.25±3.89a | 29.50±4.14a | 49.00±5.90a | 0.015 | |
| 72 | 8.50±1.41C | 32.25±1.06B | 42.70±3.18AB | 53.00±4.95A | 31.25±4.50B | 50.75±7.42A | 0.005 | |
茄子皮混合粗料∶ 精料MR of EP∶concentrate | 12 | 19.50±0.50a | 16.50±2.12a | 18.50±5.47a | 16.00±4.24a | 14.50±6.36a | 13.83±2.08a | 0.408 |
| 24 | 40.50±1.41a | 30.75±5.20a | 38.50±7.36a | 42.50±2.12a | 27.50±17.68a | 34.50±4.82a | 0.662 | |
| 48 | 44.75±0.35a | 48.75±6.05a | 43.00±8.25a | 50.75±8.25a | 45.75±10.96a | 46.67±7.93a | 0.997 | |
| 72 | 47.25±0.35a | 50.25±6.17a | 43.50±7.33a | 51.50±9.19a | 49.75±9.55a | 47.00±7.49a | 0.998 |
类型 Type | 配比 Ratio | 快速产气部分 Rapid GP (a, mL) | 缓慢产气部分 Slow GP (b, mL) | 缓慢产气常数 Constant of b (c, %·h-1) | 潜在产气部分 Potential GP (a+b, mL) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣混合粗料∶精料 MR of MBP∶concentrate | 100∶0 | 3.20±0.00b | 28.99±7.27a | 0.0755±0.0512a | 18.81±8.58a | 5.99±0.04a |
| 80∶20 | -2.52±0.53b | 32.39±8.73a | 0.0022±0.0018a | 36.98±7.02a | 5.98±0.15a | |
| 70∶30 | 9.60±6.82a | 54.29±9.42a | 0.0049±0.0007a | 58.93±9.94a | 6.06±0.10a | |
| 60∶40 | 2.51±0.13b | 40.81±2.16a | 0.0162±0.0025a | 42.82±8.60a | 6.09±0.03a | |
| 50∶50 | -3.35±0.08b | 57.40±6.71a | 0.0203±0.0157a | 55.40±8.71a | 5.98±0.07a | |
| 0∶100 | -5.05±0.16b | 62.87±3.60a | 0.0447±0.0122a | 57.06±6.35a | 6.02±0.02a | |
| P | 0.031 | 0.650 | 0.217 | 0.464 | 0.544 | |
大蒜皮混合粗料∶精料 MR of garlic peel∶concentrate | 100∶0 | -1.12±0.46a | 7.24±0.19c | 0.0358±0.0134a | 6.12±0.23C | 6.03±0.04a |
| 80∶20 | -3.12±0.95a | 33.24±0.24bc | 0.0723±0.0057a | 33.13±1.20B | 6.08±0.06a | |
| 70∶30 | -1.44±1.05a | 45.81±5.08ab | 0.0508±0.0053a | 44.37±4.04AB | 6.03±0.01a | |
| 60∶40 | -0.06±0.02a | 61.53±7.52a | 0.0506±0.0052a | 57.58±8.44A | 6.03±0.10a | |
| 50∶50 | -1.03±0.54a | 33.28±7.24bc | 0.0539±0.0146a | 32.25±6.69B | 6.02±0.01a | |
| 0∶100 | -6.63±1.05a | 60.54±8.71a | 0.0543±0.0129a | 54.91±8.65AB | 6.03±0.40a | |
| P | 0.123 | 0.013 | 0.085 | 0.007 | 0.284 | |
茄子皮混合粗料∶精料 MR of EP∶concentrate | 100∶0 | -4.87±0.55CD | 52.00±0.06a | 0.0621±0.0022a | 47.14±0.49a | 5.99±0.01a |
| 80∶20 | 3.63±3.12A | 53.56±7.47a | 0.0362±0.0050a | 52.86±5.34a | 5.99±0.01a | |
| 70∶30 | -3.62±2.37BC | 48.29±8.23a | 0.0622±0.0030a | 44.67±6.47a | 6.02±0.01a | |
| 60∶40 | -7.07±2.60D | 60.52±8.86a | 0.0581±0.0133a | 53.45±5.25a | 6.01±0.02a | |
| 50∶50 | -1.81±0.51B | 59.67±1.39a | 0.0284±0.0204a | 57.85±1.90a | 5.99±0.11a | |
| 0∶100 | -6.06±0.89CD | 55.60±7.84a | 0.0485±0.0132a | 49.53±5.97a | 6.10±0.08a | |
| P | 0.009 | 0.991 | 0.084 | 0.979 | 0.331 |
Table 5 Gas production parameters and pH after in vitro cultivation of different ratios of mixed roughage and concentrate
类型 Type | 配比 Ratio | 快速产气部分 Rapid GP (a, mL) | 缓慢产气部分 Slow GP (b, mL) | 缓慢产气常数 Constant of b (c, %·h-1) | 潜在产气部分 Potential GP (a+b, mL) | pH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣混合粗料∶精料 MR of MBP∶concentrate | 100∶0 | 3.20±0.00b | 28.99±7.27a | 0.0755±0.0512a | 18.81±8.58a | 5.99±0.04a |
| 80∶20 | -2.52±0.53b | 32.39±8.73a | 0.0022±0.0018a | 36.98±7.02a | 5.98±0.15a | |
| 70∶30 | 9.60±6.82a | 54.29±9.42a | 0.0049±0.0007a | 58.93±9.94a | 6.06±0.10a | |
| 60∶40 | 2.51±0.13b | 40.81±2.16a | 0.0162±0.0025a | 42.82±8.60a | 6.09±0.03a | |
| 50∶50 | -3.35±0.08b | 57.40±6.71a | 0.0203±0.0157a | 55.40±8.71a | 5.98±0.07a | |
| 0∶100 | -5.05±0.16b | 62.87±3.60a | 0.0447±0.0122a | 57.06±6.35a | 6.02±0.02a | |
| P | 0.031 | 0.650 | 0.217 | 0.464 | 0.544 | |
大蒜皮混合粗料∶精料 MR of garlic peel∶concentrate | 100∶0 | -1.12±0.46a | 7.24±0.19c | 0.0358±0.0134a | 6.12±0.23C | 6.03±0.04a |
| 80∶20 | -3.12±0.95a | 33.24±0.24bc | 0.0723±0.0057a | 33.13±1.20B | 6.08±0.06a | |
| 70∶30 | -1.44±1.05a | 45.81±5.08ab | 0.0508±0.0053a | 44.37±4.04AB | 6.03±0.01a | |
| 60∶40 | -0.06±0.02a | 61.53±7.52a | 0.0506±0.0052a | 57.58±8.44A | 6.03±0.10a | |
| 50∶50 | -1.03±0.54a | 33.28±7.24bc | 0.0539±0.0146a | 32.25±6.69B | 6.02±0.01a | |
| 0∶100 | -6.63±1.05a | 60.54±8.71a | 0.0543±0.0129a | 54.91±8.65AB | 6.03±0.40a | |
| P | 0.123 | 0.013 | 0.085 | 0.007 | 0.284 | |
茄子皮混合粗料∶精料 MR of EP∶concentrate | 100∶0 | -4.87±0.55CD | 52.00±0.06a | 0.0621±0.0022a | 47.14±0.49a | 5.99±0.01a |
| 80∶20 | 3.63±3.12A | 53.56±7.47a | 0.0362±0.0050a | 52.86±5.34a | 5.99±0.01a | |
| 70∶30 | -3.62±2.37BC | 48.29±8.23a | 0.0622±0.0030a | 44.67±6.47a | 6.02±0.01a | |
| 60∶40 | -7.07±2.60D | 60.52±8.86a | 0.0581±0.0133a | 53.45±5.25a | 6.01±0.02a | |
| 50∶50 | -1.81±0.51B | 59.67±1.39a | 0.0284±0.0204a | 57.85±1.90a | 5.99±0.11a | |
| 0∶100 | -6.06±0.89CD | 55.60±7.84a | 0.0485±0.0132a | 49.53±5.97a | 6.10±0.08a | |
| P | 0.009 | 0.991 | 0.084 | 0.979 | 0.331 |
| 类型Type | TP (h) | 80∶20 | 70∶30 | 60∶40 | 50∶50 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣混合粗料∶精料 MR of MBP∶concentrate | 12 | -4.29±1.65a | 52.19±7.63a | 48.22±5.74a | 38.39±3.43a | 0.061 |
| 24 | -0.54±0.82a | 42.45±2.72a | 28.21±4.66a | 34.67±5.28a | 0.668 | |
| 48 | 17.98±3.84b | 69.97±7.28a | 30.32±2.89b | 27.19±4.08b | 0.029 | |
| 72 | 21.57±7.30b | 76.17±7.13a | 27.94±3.22b | 30.53±4.01b | 0.018 | |
大蒜皮混合粗料∶精料 MR of garlic peel∶concentrate | 12 | 18.47±2.36a | 13.24±3.73a | 35.63±2.22a | 18.82±4.98a | 0.058 |
| 24 | 37.77±4.79a | 33.64±2.82a | 38.38±6.44a | 31.67±2.82a | 0.068 | |
| 48 | 13.31±4.09b | 26.44±5.54b | 56.71±6.75a | 5.00±0.28b | 0.035 | |
| 72 | 14.56±3.77c | 38.01±10.27b | 66.80±7.64a | 10.25±4.16c | 0.022 | |
茄子皮混合粗料∶精料 MR of EP∶concentrate | 12 | 14.34±3.55a | 3.93±1.27a | 7.16±4.61a | 10.25±3.53a | 0.579 |
| 24 | 20.76±4.24a | 11.97±3.35a | 23.55±4.17a | 16.22±4.36a | 0.067 | |
| 48 | 59.46±5.50a | 7.19±4.27b | 25.00±5.20b | 12.58±3.24b | 0.030 | |
| 72 | 69.77±4.83a | 2.30±1.43c | 31.82±3.90b | 26.97±4.45b | 0.021 |
Table 6 Associative effects after in vitro cultivation of different ratios of mixed roughage and concentrate (%)
| 类型Type | TP (h) | 80∶20 | 70∶30 | 60∶40 | 50∶50 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绿豆衣混合粗料∶精料 MR of MBP∶concentrate | 12 | -4.29±1.65a | 52.19±7.63a | 48.22±5.74a | 38.39±3.43a | 0.061 |
| 24 | -0.54±0.82a | 42.45±2.72a | 28.21±4.66a | 34.67±5.28a | 0.668 | |
| 48 | 17.98±3.84b | 69.97±7.28a | 30.32±2.89b | 27.19±4.08b | 0.029 | |
| 72 | 21.57±7.30b | 76.17±7.13a | 27.94±3.22b | 30.53±4.01b | 0.018 | |
大蒜皮混合粗料∶精料 MR of garlic peel∶concentrate | 12 | 18.47±2.36a | 13.24±3.73a | 35.63±2.22a | 18.82±4.98a | 0.058 |
| 24 | 37.77±4.79a | 33.64±2.82a | 38.38±6.44a | 31.67±2.82a | 0.068 | |
| 48 | 13.31±4.09b | 26.44±5.54b | 56.71±6.75a | 5.00±0.28b | 0.035 | |
| 72 | 14.56±3.77c | 38.01±10.27b | 66.80±7.64a | 10.25±4.16c | 0.022 | |
茄子皮混合粗料∶精料 MR of EP∶concentrate | 12 | 14.34±3.55a | 3.93±1.27a | 7.16±4.61a | 10.25±3.53a | 0.579 |
| 24 | 20.76±4.24a | 11.97±3.35a | 23.55±4.17a | 16.22±4.36a | 0.067 | |
| 48 | 59.46±5.50a | 7.19±4.27b | 25.00±5.20b | 12.58±3.24b | 0.030 | |
| 72 | 69.77±4.83a | 2.30±1.43c | 31.82±3.90b | 26.97±4.45b | 0.021 |
| [1] | National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China. 2020 China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021. |
| 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 2020中国统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2021. | |
| [2] | Qi R X, Ouyang J L, Wang M Z, et al. Research progress on the technology of mixed silage utilization of straw and vegetable waste in Jiangsu agricultural area. China Feed, 2020(17): 128-133. |
| 戚如鑫, 欧阳佳良, 王梦芝, 等. 江苏农区秸秆和尾菜混合青贮饲料化利用技术的研究进展. 中国饲料, 2020(17): 128-133. | |
| [3] | Yang W. Don’t discard fruit and vegetable peels lightly, some of them have high nutritional value. Medicine and Health, 2016(5): 88. |
| 杨文. 果蔬皮别轻弃 部分营养价值高. 中南药学(用药与健康), 2016(5): 88. | |
| [4] | Zhuang Y, Chen J. The nutritional value and comprehensive utilization of mung beans. Rain Fed Crops, 2009, 29(6): 418-419. |
| 庄艳, 陈剑. 绿豆的营养价值及综合利用. 杂粮作物, 2009, 29(6): 418-419. | |
| [5] | Li C H. Research progress on the application of garlic and its by-products in animal husbandry. Guangdong Feed, 2023(3): 28-30. |
| 李传华. 大蒜及其副产物在养殖业中的应用研究进展. 广东饲料, 2023(3): 28-30. | |
| [6] | Yang Y, Wang H, Lü S J. Effect of different proportions of garlic skin on serum biochemical, immunity and antioxidation of Yimeng-black goats. Feed Research, 2021, 44(8): 1-5. |
| 杨燕, 王慧, 吕慎金. 不同比例大蒜皮对沂蒙黑山羊血清生化、免疫力及抗氧化功能的影响. 饲料研究, 2021, 44(8): 1-5. | |
| [7] | Chen Z G, Wang G L, Liu C M. Effect of extra feeding with eggplant peel on dairy goats. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 26(4): 48-49. |
| 陈志国, 汪桂玲, 刘缠民. 补饲茄子皮对奶山羊的饲喂效果试验. 农业科学研究, 2005, 26(4): 48-49. | |
| [8] | Jia Z L. Summer heat clearing and heatstroke prevention feed. Rural Breeding Technology, 2008(13): 33. |
| 贾振玲. 夏季清热防暑饲料. 农村养殖技术, 2008(13): 33. | |
| [9] | Zhang J, Wu G P, Gao Y X, et al. Feeding-protein producing by solid-fermentation from vegetable wastes. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Natural Science), 2007, 43(4): 85-89. |
| 张继, 武光朋, 高义霞, 等. 蔬菜废弃物固体发酵生产饲料蛋白. 西北师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 43(4): 85-89. | |
| [10] | Partovi E, Rouzbehan Y, Fazaeli H, et al. Broccoli byproduct-wheat straw silage as a feed resource for fattening lambs. Translational Animal Science, 2020, 4(3): 1-11. |
| [11] | Zhang Y W. Associative effects of apple pomace straw silage and corn silage of cow diets in vitro. Baoding: Hebei Agricultural University, 2015. |
| 张一为. 体外法评价奶牛日粮中苹果渣麦秸青贮与玉米青贮的组合效应. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2015. | |
| [12] | Zhang Y, Xia T C, Chang Y, et al. Evaluation of the associative effects of rape straw, corn and soybean meal using an in vitro gas production technique. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(11): 185-191. |
| 张勇, 夏天婵, 常誉, 等. 体外产气法评价油菜秆与玉米、豆粕的组合效应. 草业学报, 2016, 25(11): 185-191. | |
| [13] | Lu D X. The associative effect of feeds. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000: 289-294. |
| 卢德勋. 饲料的组合效应. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 289-294. | |
| [14] | Yuan C L, Yu Z Y, Wang W D, et al. Research of associative effects of soybean stalk, peanut vine and corn stalk silage. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2015, 27(2): 647-654. |
| 袁翠林, 于子洋, 王文丹, 等. 豆秸、花生秧和青贮玉米秸间的组合效应研究. 动物营养学报, 2015, 27(2): 647-654. | |
| [15] | Menke K H, Raab L, Salewski A, et al. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy content of ruminate and starch digestion. Small Ruminate Research, 1979, 93: 217-225. |
| [16] | Qi H W, Su X X, Yu X F, et al. Research on corn grain feed dual use technology Ⅱ. Study on the dry matter degradation rate of corn stover and its silage feed at different harvesting times in the rumen of cattle. Journal of Jilin Agricultural Sciences, 2000, 25(3): 34-38. |
| 祁宏伟, 苏秀侠, 于秀芳, 等. 玉米粮饲兼用技术的研究Ⅱ. 不同收获时间的玉米秸秆及其青贮饲料在牛瘤胃内干物质降解率的研究. 吉林农业科学, 2000, 25(3): 34-38. | |
| [17] | Menke K H, Steingass H. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development, 1988, 28: 47-55. |
| [18] | Фrskov E R, McDonald I.The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighed according to rate of passage. The Journal of Agriculture Science (Camb.), 1979, 92(2): 499-503. |
| [19] | Qi R X, Ouyang J L, Chen Y F, et al. Study on nutrient change of mixed silage of rice straw and Chinese cabbage waste by orthogonal test. Feed Industry, 2019, 40(11): 25-31. |
| 戚如鑫, 欧阳佳良, 陈逸飞, 等. 正交试验研究稻草秸秆与白菜尾菜混合青贮养分的变化. 饲料工业, 2019, 40(11): 25-31. | |
| [20] | Zhou Q. Effects of different silage on performance and intestinal microorganism of Galiba cattle. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2021. |
| 周琪. 不同青贮饲料对尕力巴牛生产性能及肠道微生物的影响. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2021. | |
| [21] | Zhu K, Zhou R, Xu H W, et al. Effect of vegetable residue fermented feed on growth performance slaughtering performance and meat quality of sheep. Modern Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2021(12): 32-35. |
| 朱凯, 周瑞, 徐红伟, 等. 尾菜发酵饲料对绵羊生长性能、屠宰性能及肉品质的影响. 现代畜牧兽医, 2021(12): 32-35. | |
| [22] | Dai H W, Xie Y Q. Fermentation experiment of corn stover and cabbage tail vegetable yeast. Gansu Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2015, 45(3): 31-33. |
| 戴洪伟, 谢耀钦. 玉米秸秆和莲花菜尾菜酵母菌发酵试验. 甘肃畜牧兽医, 2015, 45(3): 31-33. | |
| [23] | Wang Z X. Lanzhou plateau summer cuisine: Wasting vegetables turn waste into treasure. Gansu Daily, 2012-04-10(15). |
| 王朝霞. 兰州高原夏菜: 尾菜变废为宝. 甘肃日报, 2012-04-10(15). | |
| [24] | Niu X Z. Study on silage of plateau summer wasting vegetables and fattening test of Tibetan sheep. Lanzhou: Northwest Minzu University, 2017. |
| 牛荇洲. 高原夏菜尾菜青贮及其对藏系绵羊饲喂效果试验研究. 兰州: 西北民族大学, 2017. | |
| [25] | Yang D L, Wang J X, Feng W H, et al. Effects of broccoli stems and leaves and maize straw mix-ensiling on silage quality. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(3): 551-557. |
| 杨道兰, 汪建旭, 冯炜弘, 等. 花椰菜茎叶与玉米秸秆的混贮品质. 草业科学, 2014, 31(3): 551-557. | |
| [26] | Li H L, Hui W S, Liu J, et al. Fermentation with the mixture of wheat straw and cabbage residues. China Brewing, 2014, 34(5): 131-134. |
| 李海玲, 惠文森, 刘杰, 等. 小麦秸秆和白菜尾菜混合发酵试验. 中国酿造, 2014, 34(5): 131-134. | |
| [27] | Wang H J. Study on the quality of different discarded vegetables silage in package. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2018. |
| 王浩杰. 不同尾菜包裹青贮饲料品质研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2018. | |
| [28] | Lan J T, Ren R, Zhou R, et al. Effects of feeding fermented cauliflower residue on growth performance, serum biochemical indices, intestinal tissue morphology and economic returns of nursery pigs. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 180-189. |
| 蓝婧婷, 任瑞, 周瑞, 等. 花椰菜尾菜发酵饲料对保育猪生长性能、血清生化指标、小肠组织形态及经济效益的影响. 草业学报, 2021, 30(6): 180-189. | |
| [29] | Wang W M. The effect of adding apple pomace to silage feed on daily weight gain and milk production of dairy cows. Graziery Veterinary Sciences, 2019(3): 11-12. |
| 王文明. 青贮饲料中添加苹果渣对奶牛日增重及产奶量影响. 畜牧兽医科学, 2019(3): 11-12. | |
| [30] | Wang J W, Li Y S, Cai J M, et al. Research progress on feedingization of vegetable waste. Feed Industry, 2023, 44(13): 93-98. |
| 王靖雯, 李玉双, 蔡佳敏, 等. 尾菜饲料化研究进展. 饲料工业, 2023, 44(13): 93-98. | |
| [31] | Das N G, Huque K S, Amanullah S M, et al. Feeding of processed vegetable wastes to bulls and its potential environmental benefit. Animal Nutrition, 2019, 5(1): 87-94. |
| [32] | Xu D W. A brief discussion on the technology of processing wasting vegetables into feed powder. Scientific Breeding Journal, 2014(11): 46. |
| 徐大文. 浅谈尾菜加工饲料粉技术. 科学种养, 2014(11): 46. | |
| [33] | Yang F M, Zhang K P, Yang M. Study on feed product technology for three different vegetable residues. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2014, 22(4): 491-495. |
| 杨富民, 张克平, 杨敏. 3种尾菜饲料化利用技术研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2014, 22(4): 491-495. | |
| [34] | Wang J L, Wei Y H, Wu X J, et al. Comparative study on rumen degradation characteristics of different parts of garlic by-products and common roughages for dairy cows. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2021, 33(10): 5708-5716. |
| 王敬林, 魏源浩, 武小娇, 等. 大蒜不同部位副产物与奶牛常规粗饲料瘤胃降解特性对比研究. 动物营养学报, 2021, 33(10): 5708-5716. | |
| [35] | Han Z Q, Li P W, Liu C C, et al. Application of garlic skin in the fattening production of Hu sheep in large-scale sheep farms. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2018(14): 155-156. |
| 韩战强, 李鹏伟, 刘长春, 等. 大蒜皮在规模化羊场湖羊育肥生产中的应用. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2018(14): 155-156. | |
| [36] | Zhang X Y, Chen Z H, Lan X, et al. Effect of three unconventional fermented feeds on growth performance and serum biochemical indicators, antibody levels of pigs. Feed Research, 2022, 45(19): 26-31. |
| 张杏艳, 陈中华, 蓝晞, 等. 3种非常规发酵饲料对猪生长及血清生化指标、抗体水平的影响. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(19): 26-31. | |
| [37] | Zhang J P. Effects of feeding garlic peel on fecal metabolomics of Hu sheep. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2021. |
| 张加平. 饲喂蒜皮对湖羊粪便代谢组学的影响. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2021. | |
| [38] | Liu G, Qu X X, Zhan W T, et al. The effect of different ratios of garlic peel in a total mixed ration on the growth performance of meat sheep in the Yellow River Delta. China Herbivore Science, 2020, 40(6): 81-83. |
| 刘刚, 曲绪仙, 战汪涛, 等. 不同大蒜皮比例全混合日粮对黄河三角洲肉羊生长性能的影响. 中国草食动物科学, 2020, 40(6): 81-83. | |
| [39] | Wei L, Zhong X Z, Zhang B C, et al. Extracting and determination of the content of flavonoids in the skin of phaseolus radiates. Journal of Zhengzhou Institute of Light Industry (Natural Science), 2001, 16(1): 58-62. |
| 卫莉, 钟秀珍, 张宝才, 等. 绿豆皮中黄酮类化合物的提取及定量测定. 郑州轻工业学院学报(自然科学版), 2001, 16(1): 58-62. | |
| [40] | Lei D Z, Jin S G, Wu R T N. Evaluating the combined effects of different roughage and the same concentrate using in vitro gas production method. Feed Industry, 2009, 30(3): 30-33. |
| 雷冬至, 金曙光, 乌仁塔娜. 用体外产气法评价不同粗饲料与相同精料间的组合效应. 饲料工业, 2009, 30(3): 30-33. |
| [1] | Hong-xin NIE, Yu-min LI, Kai-yue PANG, Sha-tuo CHAI, Di SHEN, Zi-ming ZENG, Yang LIAO, Xun WANG, Bin XUE, Shu-jie LIU, Shu-xiang WANG, Ying-kui YANG. Effect of different concentrate to forage ratios on the structure of microflora in yak manure [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(12): 189-197. |
| [2] | Dong-wen DAI, Kai-yue Pang, xun WANG, Ying-kui YANG, Sha-tuo CHAI, Shu-xiang WANG. Effects of different concentrate supplement levels on rumen fermentation and microbial community structure of grazing yaks in the warm season [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(5): 169-177. |
| [3] | Ya-dong JIN, Hai-xia ZHAO, Rui-qi GUI, Qing MA, Yu-xiang ZHOU. Effects of dietary concentrate level and chromium-methionine supplementation on ruminal fermentation, and ruminal bacterial and fatty acid composition in Tan lambs [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(2): 192-202. |
| [4] | Yuan-yuan WEN, Mei-qi ZHANG, Tao-tao LIU, Yi-zhao SHEN, Yan-xia GAO, Qiu-feng LI, Yu-feng CAO, Jian-guo LI. Associative effects between whole crop maize silage and mixed silage made from raw potato crisp processing by-product and rice straw as determined using an in vitro gas production technique [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 154-163. |
| [5] | Dan-dan ZHANG, Yuan-qing ZHANG, Jing CHENG, Guang JIN, Bo LI, Dong-cai WANG, Fang XU, Rui-feng SUN. Effects of different roughage combinations on in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of Jinnan cattle [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 93-100. |
| [6] | Jiang-wei LI, Zhi-you WANG, Sheng-zhen HOU, Yun LEI, Jian-lei JIA, Li ZHOU, Lin-sheng GUI. Effects of dietary concentrate∶roughage ratio on rumen morphology and microbial flora in fattening Tibetan sheep [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 100-109. |
| [7] | TU Rui, MIAO Jian-jun, PENG Zhong-li, GAO Yan-hua, BAI Xue, XIE Xin-ting. An in vitro study of dietary concentrate∶forage ratio and small peptide supplementation effects on ruminal fermentation parameters of yaks [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(3): 78-88. |
| [8] | TANG De-fu, YUAN Jiu, WANG Yan-qian, WANG Yan-na, WANG Juan-li, LIU Zi-qiang, KOU Wei, CUI Zhong-yong, ZHANG Ze-yan, ZHAO Xiang-min, WAN Xin-jie. Evaluation using a gas production technique in vitro of associative effects on digestibility of corn cob, alfalfa and concentrate in mixed rations [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(6): 137-147. |
| [9] | DU Shuai, YOU Si-han, BAO Jian, Gegentu, JIA Yu-shan. Effects of different nutrition levels on growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of Wuzhumuqin lamb [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(6): 196-203. |
| [10] | MIAO Jian-jun, PENG Zhong-li, GAO Yan-hua, GUO Chun-hua, WANG Ding, FU Yang-yang. Effects on production performance, slaughter performance, apparent digestibility of nutrients and meat quality of partial substitution of corn concentrate with highland barley in a yak fattening system [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(1): 95-107. |
| [11] | YUAN Jiu, TANG De-fu, WAN Xin-jie, ZHU Bao-zhen, HE Tian-le, YU Hai-shan, WANG Jun-jun. Effects of the proportion of pomelo peel and alfalfa in different concentrate-roughage ratios on the associative effects of diets in vitro [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(6): 188-196. |
| [12] | LUO Yan-wen, TIAN Ping, HUA Can-feng, TAO Shi-yu, NI Ying-dong. Effects of feeding high concentrate diets on glucose and lipid metabolism in the liver of lactating goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(1): 177-186. |
| [13] | LI Hong-Wei, LIU Jun-Hua, HUO Wen-Jie, ZHU Wei-Yun, MAO Sheng-Yong. Effects of high concentrate diet on microbial fermentation and biogenic amine formation and absorption in the rumen and cecum of goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(6): 210-216. |
| [14] | LI Yan, HAN Xiao-Min, LI Jian-Guo, LI Qiu-Feng, GAO Yan-Xia, CAO Yu-Feng, LI Yun-Qi. Associative effects of cornstalk, millet straw, and corn stalk on silage digestibility in vitro [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(5): 213-223. |
| [15] | TIAN Ping, SUN Li-Li, DONG Hai-Bo, TIAN Jing, DUANMU Yong-Qian, TAO Shi-Yu, NI Ying-Dong. Effects of feeding high concentrate diets on lactation indicators and antioxidant levels in the mammary glands of lactating goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(4): 99-105. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||
