Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (12): 61-72.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020048
Previous Articles Next Articles
Hao-tian WU1(), Jiao NIE1, Wen-juan YANG1, Zhi-yong ZHANG1, Kang-hong WU1, Xiao-yu LI1, Xiao-mei FANG1,2, Ren-wu RUAN1,2, Ze-lin YI1,2()
Received:
2020-02-05
Revised:
2020-04-30
Online:
2020-12-28
Published:
2020-12-28
Contact:
Ze-lin YI
Hao-tian WU, Jiao NIE, Wen-juan YANG, Zhi-yong ZHANG, Kang-hong WU, Xiao-yu LI, Xiao-mei FANG, Ren-wu RUAN, Ze-lin YI. Effects of machine sowing depth and amounts of seeds and fertilizer on lodging and yield of Tartary buckwheat[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(12): 61-72.
处理 Treatment | 因素 Factor | ||
---|---|---|---|
播种深度 Sowing depth (A, cm) | 播种量 Sowing rates (B, kg·hm-2) | 施肥量 Fertilizing amount (C, kg·hm-2) | |
1 | 1 (2) | 1 (16.8) | 1 (150) |
2 | 1 (2) | 2 (33.6) | 2 (300) |
3 | 1 (2) | 3 (50.4) | 3 (450) |
4 | 2 (3) | 1 (16.8) | 2 (300) |
5 | 2 (3) | 2 (33.6) | 3 (450) |
6 | 2 (3) | 3 (50.4) | 1 (150) |
7 | 3 (4) | 1 (16.8) | 3 (450) |
8 | 3 (4) | 2 (33.6) | 1 (150) |
9 | 3 (4) | 3 (50.4) | 2 (300) |
Table 1 L934 orthogonal design
处理 Treatment | 因素 Factor | ||
---|---|---|---|
播种深度 Sowing depth (A, cm) | 播种量 Sowing rates (B, kg·hm-2) | 施肥量 Fertilizing amount (C, kg·hm-2) | |
1 | 1 (2) | 1 (16.8) | 1 (150) |
2 | 1 (2) | 2 (33.6) | 2 (300) |
3 | 1 (2) | 3 (50.4) | 3 (450) |
4 | 2 (3) | 1 (16.8) | 2 (300) |
5 | 2 (3) | 2 (33.6) | 3 (450) |
6 | 2 (3) | 3 (50.4) | 1 (150) |
7 | 3 (4) | 1 (16.8) | 3 (450) |
8 | 3 (4) | 2 (33.6) | 1 (150) |
9 | 3 (4) | 3 (50.4) | 2 (300) |
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | 单株粒数 Grain number per plant | 千粒重 Thousand grains weight (g) | 总株数Number of plants (×104 plant·hm-2 ) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | |
1 | 1647.00±16.17f | 1636.86±17.94e | 111.33±4.04d | 113.67±4.93d | 31.16±0.97c | 31.83±0.81b | 43.45±0.68h | 43.32±0.37e |
2 | 1674.71±8.58ef | 1664.38±9.49de | 103.33±2.52e | 107.33±1.53de | 29.31±0.18d | 30.03±0.28cd | 88.65±0.54e | 87.50±0.62d |
3 | 1726.01±14.49cd | 1721.15±10.64c | 99.33±2.52e | 105.00±2.65e | 28.28±0.15e | 28.98±0.14de | 132.95±0.68b | 131.07±0.38b |
4 | 1699.66±18.81de | 1687.66±18.81d | 135.00±8.89a | 139.67±8.74a | 32.22±0.68b | 32.86±0.68ab | 44.25±0.52g | 42.63±0.97f |
5 | 1823.36±17.47a | 1816.78±18.28a | 121.67±4.04bc | 127.00±3.00bc | 30.42±0.29c | 30.42±0.89c | 89.45±0.18d | 88.84±0.62c |
6 | 1774.12±22.10b | 1764.12±22.08b | 100.00±6.00e | 106.33±6.03de | 22.36±0.74g | 22.88±0.80g | 133.30±0.38a | 132.53±0.13a |
7 | 1669.73±14.49f | 1659.73±14.49de | 127.00±6.56b | 132.67±6.03ab | 33.50±0.19a | 33.90±0.07a | 43.15±0.97i | 41.71±0.08g |
8 | 1742.73±11.59c | 1733.05±11.47c | 115.67±3.06cd | 121.67±3.06c | 28.38±0.49e | 28.57±0.54e | 88.25±0.86f | 87.31±0.17d |
9 | 1782.77±11.18b | 1776.17±9.48b | 98.00±1.00e | 105.00±1.00e | 24.73±0.20f | 25.23±0.40f | 132.25±0.67c | 131.01±0.47b |
Table 2 Yield and yield components of tartary buckwheat under different treatment
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | 单株粒数 Grain number per plant | 千粒重 Thousand grains weight (g) | 总株数Number of plants (×104 plant·hm-2 ) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | |
1 | 1647.00±16.17f | 1636.86±17.94e | 111.33±4.04d | 113.67±4.93d | 31.16±0.97c | 31.83±0.81b | 43.45±0.68h | 43.32±0.37e |
2 | 1674.71±8.58ef | 1664.38±9.49de | 103.33±2.52e | 107.33±1.53de | 29.31±0.18d | 30.03±0.28cd | 88.65±0.54e | 87.50±0.62d |
3 | 1726.01±14.49cd | 1721.15±10.64c | 99.33±2.52e | 105.00±2.65e | 28.28±0.15e | 28.98±0.14de | 132.95±0.68b | 131.07±0.38b |
4 | 1699.66±18.81de | 1687.66±18.81d | 135.00±8.89a | 139.67±8.74a | 32.22±0.68b | 32.86±0.68ab | 44.25±0.52g | 42.63±0.97f |
5 | 1823.36±17.47a | 1816.78±18.28a | 121.67±4.04bc | 127.00±3.00bc | 30.42±0.29c | 30.42±0.89c | 89.45±0.18d | 88.84±0.62c |
6 | 1774.12±22.10b | 1764.12±22.08b | 100.00±6.00e | 106.33±6.03de | 22.36±0.74g | 22.88±0.80g | 133.30±0.38a | 132.53±0.13a |
7 | 1669.73±14.49f | 1659.73±14.49de | 127.00±6.56b | 132.67±6.03ab | 33.50±0.19a | 33.90±0.07a | 43.15±0.97i | 41.71±0.08g |
8 | 1742.73±11.59c | 1733.05±11.47c | 115.67±3.06cd | 121.67±3.06c | 28.38±0.49e | 28.57±0.54e | 88.25±0.86f | 87.31±0.17d |
9 | 1782.77±11.18b | 1776.17±9.48b | 98.00±1.00e | 105.00±1.00e | 24.73±0.20f | 25.23±0.40f | 132.25±0.67c | 131.01±0.47b |
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | 单株粒数 Grain number per plant | 千粒重 Thousand grains weight (g) | 总株数Number of plants (×104 plant·hm-2 ) | 倒伏率 Lodging percentage (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | |
A1 | 1682.57c | 1674.13c | 104.67c | 108.67c | 29.58a | 30.28a | 88.35b | 87.29b | 33.11a | 33.89a |
A2 | 1765.71a | 1756.19a | 118.89a | 124.33a | 28.33b | 28.72b | 89.00a | 88.00a | 17.14c | 18.14c |
A3 | 1731.74b | 1722.98b | 113.56b | 119.78b | 28.87b | 29.23b | 87.88c | 86.68c | 25.08b | 26.09b |
B1 | 1672.13c | 1661.42c | 124.44a | 128.67a | 32.29a | 32.86a | 43.62c | 42.56c | 19.11c | 20.11c |
B2 | 1777.38a | 1771.37a | 113.56b | 118.67b | 29.37b | 29.67b | 88.78b | 87.88b | 22.43b | 23.44b |
B3 | 1730.52b | 1720.52b | 99.11c | 105.44c | 25.12c | 25.70c | 132.83a | 131.54a | 33.80a | 34.58a |
C1 | 1737.70a | 1728.90a | 109.00b | 113.89b | 27.30c | 27.76c | 88.33b | 87.05b | 23.41b | 24.41b |
C2 | 1719.05ab | 1709.40ab | 112.11ab | 117.33ab | 28.75b | 29.37b | 88.38ab | 87.21ab | 23.77b | 24.77b |
C3 | 1723.29ab | 1714.99ab | 116.00a | 121.55a | 30.74a | 31.10a | 88.52a | 87.72a | 28.16a | 28.94a |
RA | 83.14** | 82.06** | 14.22** | 15.67** | 1.25* | 1.56* | 1.12* | 1.32* | 15.97** | 15.75** |
RB | 105.25** | 109.95** | 25.33** | 23.22** | 7.17** | 7.17** | 89.22** | 88.98** | 14.69** | 14.47** |
RC | 18.65 | 19.49 | 7.00* | 7.67* | 3.44* | 3.34* | 0.12 | 0.35 | 4.75* | 4.52* |
Table 3 The multiple comparisons of yield and yield compositions, lodging percentage of tartary buckwheat under different treatments
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | 单株粒数 Grain number per plant | 千粒重 Thousand grains weight (g) | 总株数Number of plants (×104 plant·hm-2 ) | 倒伏率 Lodging percentage (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | |
A1 | 1682.57c | 1674.13c | 104.67c | 108.67c | 29.58a | 30.28a | 88.35b | 87.29b | 33.11a | 33.89a |
A2 | 1765.71a | 1756.19a | 118.89a | 124.33a | 28.33b | 28.72b | 89.00a | 88.00a | 17.14c | 18.14c |
A3 | 1731.74b | 1722.98b | 113.56b | 119.78b | 28.87b | 29.23b | 87.88c | 86.68c | 25.08b | 26.09b |
B1 | 1672.13c | 1661.42c | 124.44a | 128.67a | 32.29a | 32.86a | 43.62c | 42.56c | 19.11c | 20.11c |
B2 | 1777.38a | 1771.37a | 113.56b | 118.67b | 29.37b | 29.67b | 88.78b | 87.88b | 22.43b | 23.44b |
B3 | 1730.52b | 1720.52b | 99.11c | 105.44c | 25.12c | 25.70c | 132.83a | 131.54a | 33.80a | 34.58a |
C1 | 1737.70a | 1728.90a | 109.00b | 113.89b | 27.30c | 27.76c | 88.33b | 87.05b | 23.41b | 24.41b |
C2 | 1719.05ab | 1709.40ab | 112.11ab | 117.33ab | 28.75b | 29.37b | 88.38ab | 87.21ab | 23.77b | 24.77b |
C3 | 1723.29ab | 1714.99ab | 116.00a | 121.55a | 30.74a | 31.10a | 88.52a | 87.72a | 28.16a | 28.94a |
RA | 83.14** | 82.06** | 14.22** | 15.67** | 1.25* | 1.56* | 1.12* | 1.32* | 15.97** | 15.75** |
RB | 105.25** | 109.95** | 25.33** | 23.22** | 7.17** | 7.17** | 89.22** | 88.98** | 14.69** | 14.47** |
RC | 18.65 | 19.49 | 7.00* | 7.67* | 3.44* | 3.34* | 0.12 | 0.35 | 4.75* | 4.52* |
处理 Treatment | 倒伏时期Lodging stage | 倒伏级别Lodging degree | 倒伏率Lodging percentage (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | |
1 | FS | FS | 2 | 2 | 24.12±1.36c | 25.52±1.05c |
2 | FBS | FBS | 2 | 3 | 28.70±2.62b | 29.36±1.12b |
3 | FBS | FBS | 3 | 3 | 46.50±0.61a | 46.84±1.05a |
4 | MS | MS | 1 | 1 | 11.45±1.05e | 13.15±0.80e |
5 | MS | MS | 1 | 2 | 16.23±0.91d | 17.62±0.85d |
6 | MS | FS | 1 | 1 | 23.74±0.14c | 24.18±0.37c |
7 | MS | FS | 2 | 2 | 21.74±0.37c | 21.93±0.73c |
8 | FS | FS | 1 | 1 | 22.36±2.50c | 23.74±1.73c |
9 | FS | FS | 2 | 2 | 31.14±1.02b | 32.08±1.93b |
Table 4 Lodging characteristics of tartary buckwheat under different treatment
处理 Treatment | 倒伏时期Lodging stage | 倒伏级别Lodging degree | 倒伏率Lodging percentage (%) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | |
1 | FS | FS | 2 | 2 | 24.12±1.36c | 25.52±1.05c |
2 | FBS | FBS | 2 | 3 | 28.70±2.62b | 29.36±1.12b |
3 | FBS | FBS | 3 | 3 | 46.50±0.61a | 46.84±1.05a |
4 | MS | MS | 1 | 1 | 11.45±1.05e | 13.15±0.80e |
5 | MS | MS | 1 | 2 | 16.23±0.91d | 17.62±0.85d |
6 | MS | FS | 1 | 1 | 23.74±0.14c | 24.18±0.37c |
7 | MS | FS | 2 | 2 | 21.74±0.37c | 21.93±0.73c |
8 | FS | FS | 1 | 1 | 22.36±2.50c | 23.74±1.73c |
9 | FS | FS | 2 | 2 | 31.14±1.02b | 32.08±1.93b |
性状Trait | 产量Yield | 倒伏率Lodging percentage | 茎秆抗折力Culm breaking resistance |
---|---|---|---|
倒伏率 Lodging percentage | -0.726* | ||
茎秆抗折力 Culm breaking resistance | 0.428 | -0.963** | |
第二节间长 Length of the 2nd internode | -0.473 | 0.784* | -0.935** |
第二节间粗 Diameter of the 2nd internode | 0.932** | -0.989** | 0.945** |
第二节间鲜重 Fresh weight of the 2nd internode | -0.868** | -0.878** | 0.982** |
木质素含量 Lignin content in culm | 0.943** | -0.914** | 0.987** |
4CL活性 4CL activity | 0.378 | -0.618* | 0.867** |
PAL活性 PAL activity | 0.403 | -0.647* | 0.809** |
CAD活性 CAD activity | 0.358 | -0.608* | 0.795* |
Table 5 Correlation coefficient between morphological and physiological characteristics of second internode and lodging resistance of tartary buckwheat
性状Trait | 产量Yield | 倒伏率Lodging percentage | 茎秆抗折力Culm breaking resistance |
---|---|---|---|
倒伏率 Lodging percentage | -0.726* | ||
茎秆抗折力 Culm breaking resistance | 0.428 | -0.963** | |
第二节间长 Length of the 2nd internode | -0.473 | 0.784* | -0.935** |
第二节间粗 Diameter of the 2nd internode | 0.932** | -0.989** | 0.945** |
第二节间鲜重 Fresh weight of the 2nd internode | -0.868** | -0.878** | 0.982** |
木质素含量 Lignin content in culm | 0.943** | -0.914** | 0.987** |
4CL活性 4CL activity | 0.378 | -0.618* | 0.867** |
PAL活性 PAL activity | 0.403 | -0.647* | 0.809** |
CAD活性 CAD activity | 0.358 | -0.608* | 0.795* |
1 | Zhou M L, Ivan K, Galina S, et al. Buckwheat germplasm in the world. London: Academic Press, 2018. |
2 | Susan S. Advances in food and nutrition research. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 2018, 50(2): 213. |
3 | Zhao G, Shan F. Tartary buckwheat. Beijing: Science Press, 2009 |
赵钢, 陕方. 中国苦荞. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009. | |
4 | Ohmi O, Mitsuyuki T. Distribution of cultivated and wild buckwheat species in the Nu river valley of Southwestern China. Fagopyrum, 2005(22): 1-5. |
5 | Feng B L, Yao A H, Gao J F, et al. Study on the regional layout and development of buckwheat in China. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 21(3): 375-377. |
冯佰利, 姚爱华, 高金峰, 等. 中国荞麦优势区域布局与发展研究. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(3): 375-377. | |
6 | Ding M Q, Wu Y M, Wei L, et al. Progress of research on buckwheat forage and its application in the livestock and poultry industries. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(1): 176-185. |
丁梦琦, 吴燕民, 未丽, 等. 饲用荞麦在畜牧业中的应用与研究. 草业科学, 2018, 35(1): 176-185. | |
7 | Xiang D B, Peng L X, Zhao G, et al. Advances in the cultivation of buckwheat. Crops, 2013(3): 1-6. |
向达兵, 彭镰心, 赵钢, 等. 荞麦栽培研究进展. 作物杂志, 2013(3): 1-6. | |
8 | Zhao G, Zou L. Nutrition and function of buckwheat. Beijing: Science Press, 2012. |
赵钢, 邹亮. 荞麦的营养与功能. 北京: 科学出版社, 2012. | |
9 | Zhao G, Zhao J L, Peng L X, et al. Effects of yeast polysaccharide on growth and flavonoid accumulation in Fagopyrum tataricum sprout cultures. Molecules, 2012, 17(10): 11335-11345. |
10 | Zuo G M, Tan B, Wang J H, et al. Evaluation and utilization of nutrient function components in tartary buckwheat rice and tartary buckwheat powder processing. Food Science, 2009, 30(14): 183-187. |
左光明, 谭斌, 王金华, 等. 苦荞米与苦荞粉加工中营养功能成分的评价及利用. 食品科学, 2009, 30(14): 183-187. | |
11 | Gao W Y. Research on the development status and promotion strategy of small agricultural machinery. Times Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 45(1): 23-24. |
高文勇. 小型农业机械的发展状况及推广策略研究. 时代农机, 2018, 45(1): 23-24. | |
12 | Ding X Y. Study on mechanized cultivation technology of buckwheat. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013(9): 9-12. |
丁孝义. 荞麦机械化栽培技术研究. 现代农业科技, 2013(9): 9-12. | |
13 | Yang M J, Yang Y, Guo Z X, et al. Comprehensive high yield cultivation techniques of tartary buckwheat. Inner Mongolia Agricultural Science and Technology, 2010(3): 129. |
杨明君, 杨媛, 郭忠贤, 等. 苦荞麦综合高产栽培技术. 内蒙古农业科技, 2010(3): 129. | |
14 | Zheng T, Fan G Q, Wang X F, et al. Effect of tillage management, sowing depth and soil-covering on the seedlings quality of mechanical sowing wheat under intercropping condition. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27(5): 164-168. |
郑亭, 樊高琼, 王秀芳, 等. 耕作方式、播深及覆土对机播套作小麦麦苗素质的影响. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(5): 164-168. | |
15 | Li H M, Jiang L H, Gu Z X. Influence factors and improvement measures of maize machine planting quality. Agricultural Engineering, 2012, 2(9): 14-16. |
李慧敏, 姜连花, 谷在兴. 玉米机播质量影响因素及改进措施. 农业工程, 2012, 2(9): 14-16. | |
16 | Wang X C, Yang W Y. The mechanization of maize soybean strip intercropping has stepped to a new level. Soybean Science and Technology, 2012(6): 48-50 |
王小春, 杨文钰. 玉米-大豆带状间套作全程机械化迈上新台阶. 大豆科技, 2012(6): 48-50. | |
17 | Wu W X, Ma R C, Fan G Q, et al. Mechanized farming system of wheat/maize/bean//The 11th annual conference of China association for science and technology. Beijing: China Association for Science and Technology, 2009: 189-192. |
吴维雄, 马荣朝, 樊高琼, 等. “麦/玉/豆”配套机械化生产体系研究// 第十一届中国科学技术协会年会论文集. 北京: 中国科学技术协会, 2009: 189-192. | |
18 | Kong E, Liu D C, Guo X L, et al. Anatomical and chemical characteristics associated with lodging resistance in wheat. The Crop Journal, 2013(1): 43-49. |
19 | Jones L, Ennos A R, Turner S R. Cloning and characterization of irregular xylem4 (irx4): A severely lignin-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal, 2001, 26(2): 205-216. |
20 | Gao Z N, Guo L Z, Li L, et al. Effects of nitrogen on oilseed flax stem lignin and relative enzyme and lodging resistance. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2014, 36(5): 610-615. |
高珍妮, 郭丽琢, 李丽, 等. 氮肥对胡麻茎秆木质素合成酶活性及其抗倒性的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2014, 36(5): 610-615. | |
21 | Xiang D B, Li J, Fan Y, et al. Effect of planting density on lodging resistance and yield of tartary buckwheat. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(6): 242-247. |
向达兵, 李静, 范昱, 等. 种植密度对苦荞麦抗倒伏特性及产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(6): 242-247. | |
22 | Liu X B, Wu D Q, Wang C, et al. Effects of spraying uniconazole on lodging resistance of culm and yield in common buckwheat. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(24): 4903-4915. |
刘星贝, 吴东倩, 汪灿, 等. 喷施烯效唑对甜荞茎秆抗倒性能及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(24): 4903-4915. | |
23 | Wang C, Li M, Wang S X, et al. Effects of different sowing date, seeding rate and fertilization on yield and agronomic traits of Fagopyrum esculentum Xinnong 1 planted spring. Guizhou Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 42(3): 52-55. |
汪灿, 李曼, 王诗雪, 等. 不同播期、播种量和施肥量对甜荞信农1号春播产量及农艺性状的影响. 贵州农业科学, 2014, 42(3): 52-55. | |
24 | Wang C, Ruan R W, Yuan X H, et al. Relationship of anatomical structure and lignin metabolism with lodging resistance of culm in buckwheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2014, 40(10): 1846-1856. |
汪灿, 阮仁武, 袁晓辉, 等. 荞麦茎秆解剖结构和木质素代谢及其与抗倒性的关系. 作物学报, 2014, 40(10): 1846-1856. | |
25 | Qiao C G. Lodging index-a synthetic indication of lodging-resistance. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 1988, 10(1): 7-10. |
乔春贵. 作物抗倒伏性的综合指标——倒伏指数. 吉林农业大学学报, 1988, 10(1): 7-10. | |
26 | Xiang D B, Zou L, Peng L X, et al. Appropriate mechanical sowing depth and soil-covering thickness improving seedling quality of tartary buckwheat. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(12): 26-33. |
向达兵, 邹亮, 彭镰心, 等. 适宜机播深度及覆土厚度提高苦荞幼苗素质. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(12): 26-33. | |
27 | Fan G Q, Zheng T, Chen Y,et al. Effects of tillage managements, sowing depth and soil-covering on population quality and yield of mechanical sowing wheat under relay intercropping condition. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2011, 27: 20-25. |
樊高琼, 郑亭, 陈溢, 等. 耕作方式、播深及覆土对机播套作小麦群体质量和产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2011, 27(S2): 20-25. | |
28 | Molatudi R L, Mariga I K. The effect of maize seed size and depth of planting on seedling emergence and seedling vigor. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 2009, 5(12): 2234-2237. |
29 | Liu X, Yin C M, Li H, et al. Sowing depth and waterlogging time after wheat sowing affect on germination rate and seedling quality before winter. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(3): 189-194. |
刘鑫, 尹承苗, 李慧, 等. 播种深度和播后淹水时间对冬小麦出苗率及冬前幼苗质量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(3): 189-194. | |
30 | Zhang Y L, Xiao K, Li Y M. Effects and physiological mechanism of planting densities on photosynthesis characteristics of flag leaf and grain yield in wheat hybrid C6-38/Py85-1. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2005, 31 (4): 498-505. |
张永丽, 肖凯, 李雁鸣. 种植密度对杂种小麦C6-38/Py85-1旗叶光合特性和产量的调控效应及其生理机制. 作物学报, 2005, 31 (4): 498-505. | |
31 | Wang X, Li Z Y, Ma W Q, et al. Effects of fertilization on yield increase of wheat in different agro-ecological regions of China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(12): 2469-2476. |
王旭, 李贞宇, 马文奇, 等. 中国主要生态区小麦施肥增产效应分析. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(12): 2469-2476. | |
32 | Berry P M, Spink J. Predicting yield losses caused by lodging in wheat. Field Crops Research, 2012, 137: 19-26. |
33 | Acreche M M, Slafer G A. Lodging yield penalties as affected by breeding in Mediterranean wheats. Field Crops Research, 2011, 122: 40-48. |
34 | Lang Y Z, Yang X D, Wang M E, et al. Effects of lodging at different filling stages on rice grain yield and quality. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 25(4): 407-412. |
郎有忠, 杨晓东, 王美娥, 等. 结实阶段不同时期倒伏对水稻产量及稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(4): 407-412. | |
35 | Cao P W, Zhao M L, Wang J H, et al. Effect of lodging on maize yield in different stages. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2014(4): 38-39. |
曹品伟, 赵美玲, 王建华, 等. 不同时期的倒伏对玉米产量的影响. 黑龙江农业科学, 2014(4): 38-39. | |
36 | Huang Y G, Zheng Y H, Yuan Y S, et al. Effects of lodging period and degree on wheat yield. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 46(6): 51-53, 58. |
黄迎光, 郑以宏, 袁永胜, 等. 倒伏时期和倒伏程度对小麦产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(6): 51-53, 58. | |
37 | Yang Y H, Zhu Z, Zhang Y D, et al. Relationship between lodging resistance and stem morphological traits in different rice varieties (lines). Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 27(2): 231-235. |
杨艳华, 朱镇, 张亚东, 等. 不同水稻品种(系)抗倒伏能力与茎秆形态性状的关系. 江苏农业学报, 2011, 27(2): 231-235. | |
38 | Ma N, Li L, Xu J, et al. Researches on the lodging resistance and agronomic traits of winter rape (Brassica napus L.). Crops, 2010(6): 36-41. |
马霓, 李玲, 徐军, 等. 甘蓝型油菜抗倒伏性及农艺性状研究. 作物杂志, 2010(6): 36-41. | |
39 | Dong Q, Wang A P, Liang S M. Study on the architectural characteristics of wheat stalks. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University, 2003, 23(3): 188-191. |
董琦, 王爱萍, 梁素明. 小麦基部茎节形态结构特征与抗倒性的研究. 山西农业大学学报, 2003, 23(3): 188-191. | |
40 | Wang C, Ruan R W, Yuan X H, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and planting density on the lignin synthesis in the culm in relation to lodging resistance of buckwheat. Plant Production Science, 2015, 18(2): 218-227. |
41 | Hu D, Liu X B, Wang C, et al. Expression analysis of key enzyme genes in lignin synthesis of culm among different lodging resistances of common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench). Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(9): 1864-1872. |
胡丹, 刘星贝, 汪灿, 等. 不同抗倒性甜荞茎秆木质素合成关键酶基因的表达分析. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(9): 1864-1872. |
[1] | Hui-long LIN, Yan-fei PU, Dan-ni WANG, Hai-li MA. Index insurances for grasslands: A review and the Chinese scheme design [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 171-185. |
[2] | Jing-dong ZHAO, Yan-tao SONG, Xin-lei XU, Wuyunna. Effects of nitrogen application and mowing on yield and quality of forage in degraded grassland in northwest Liaoning Province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 36-48. |
[3] | Qiang XU, Xin-hui TIAN, Wen-hua DU. Effects of mixed sowing of rye and common vetch on forage yield and nutrient quality in alpine pastoral areas [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 49-59. |
[4] | Yu-xia WANG, Jin-long CHAI, Yang-yang ZHOU, Chang-lin XU, Lin WANG, Xiao-jun YU. Effects of planting method on seed yield and its components in Medicago ruthenica in an arid area of Longzhong [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 60-72. |
[5] | Xin-you WANG, Wen-xia CAO, Xiao-jun WANG, Yu-zhen LIU, Rui GAO, Shi-lin WANG, Hai-tao AN, Xiu-xia DENG, Wen-hu WANG. Herbage production and forage quality responses to cutting height and fertilization of legume-grass mixtures in the Hexi region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 99-110. |
[6] | Kai-qiang LIU, Wen-hui LIU, Zhi-feng JIA, Guo-ling LIANG, Xiang MA. Effects of drought stress on yield and dry matter accumulation and distribution of Avena sativa cv. Qingyan No.1 [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 177-188. |
[7] | Wan-jun XIAO, Feng-xia GUO, Yuan CHEN, Lan-lan LIU, Yong-zhong CHEN, Xu-sheng JIAO, Bi-quan ZHANG, Gang BAI, Jian-qin JIN. Effect of organic fertilizer application on the medicinal character, yield and disease resistance of Angelica sinensis [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 189-199. |
[8] | Yu-lei JIA, Zhen LIAO, Li-fang WANG, Jian-chao BU, Biao-sheng LIN, Hui LIN, De-wei SU, Guo-dong LU, Zhan-xi LIN. Effects of chemical fertilizer reduction and co-application with a JUNCAO nitrogen-fixing biofertilizer on growth and nutritional quality of Pennisetum giganteum and soil nutrient status [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 215-223. |
[9] | Bai-ping SHA, Ying-zhong XIE, Xue-qin GAO, Wei CAI, Bing-zhe FU. Effects of coupling of drip irrigation water and fertilizer on yield and quality of alfalfa in the yellow river irrigation district [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(2): 102-114. |
[10] | Hong-lin WANG, Yan-chun ZUO, Xu YAN, Xiao-kang ZHOU, Jing KOU, Xi-zhi YANG, Jun-ying GUO, Jun PU, Hao-ren ZHANG, Zhou-he DU. Effect of cutting height and nitrogen fertilizer rate on yield and nutritive value of whole-plant mulberry (Morus alba) [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(11): 203-211. |
[11] | Tenzin Tarchen, Purna Bhadra Chapagain, Shankar Raj Pant, Jiebu, Dunzhu Gesang, Shao-feng CHEN. Growth characteristics and nutritive value of multiple oat varieties in mountainous Northern Nepal [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(10): 73-82. |
[12] | Le-zheng WANG, Fang-jing HUA, Peng-peng CAO, Feng-ju GAO, Wen-rong XIA. Yield and dynamic responses of yield components of adzuki bean to insolation, temperature and rainfall across five sowing dates [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 116-129. |
[13] | Hui-xin JIANG, Shan-shan BAI, Bo WU, Jing-yi SONG, Guo-liang WANG. A multivariate evaluation of agronomic straits and forage quality of 22 oat varieties in the Huang-Huai-Hai area of China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 140-149. |
[14] | YU Xiao-bo, LIANG Jian-qiu, HE Ze-min, ZHOU Quan-lu, WU Hai-ying, ZHANG Ming-rong. Response of stem characteristics and yield to sowing rate in soybean [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(9): 117-124. |
[15] | TONG Chang-chun, LIU Xiao-jing, LIN Fang, YU Tie-feng. Yield effect of optimisation of photosynthetic characteristics of alfalfa through balanced fertilization [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 70-80. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||