Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 152-160.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020469
Hui-fang YAN1(), Juan SUN1,2()
Received:
2020-10-13
Revised:
2020-12-14
Online:
2021-11-11
Published:
2021-11-11
Contact:
Juan SUN
Hui-fang YAN, Juan SUN. Effect of seed moisture content and deterioration time on seed vigor and seedling growth of Sorghum bicolor×Sorghum sudanense[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(12): 152-160.
指标 Index | 含水量 Moisture content (%) | 劣变时间Deterioration time | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 4 d | 8 d | 12 d | 16 d | 20 d | 24 d | 28 d | ||
苗长 Shoot length (cm) | 10 | 7.62±0.12Aa | 7.60±0.19Aa | 6.70±0.09ABa | 6.62±0.17ABa | 5.88±0.17ABa | 6.08±0.14ABa | 4.56±0.08Ba | 5.03±0.18Ba |
12 | 7.64±0.15Aa | 7.43±0.11Aa | 6.12±0.15Ba | 6.22±0.35Ba | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
16 | 7.69±0.18Aa | 5.89±0.20Bb | 0.84±0.84Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
苗鲜重 Shoot weight (g·plant-1) | 10 | 2.46±0.06Aa | 2.54±0.07Aa | 1.99±0.09Ba | 2.08±0.09Ba | 1.72±0.06Ca | 1.34±0.10Da | 0.52±0.05Ea | 0.21±0.06Fa |
12 | 2.28±0.12Aa | 2.13±0.07Ab | 1.29±0.09Bb | 0.28±0.08Cb | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | |
16 | 2.52±0.09Aa | 0.88±0.03Bc | 0.02±0.02Cc | 0.00±0.00Cc | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
根长 Root length (cm) | 10 | 10.85±0.25Aa | 10.10±0.21Aa | 10.47±0.35Ab | 12.00±0.55Aa | 11.42±0.07Aa | 12.70±0.55Aa | 10.58±0.42Aa | 10.78±0.67Aa |
12 | 11.08±0.19ABa | 11.79±0.87ABa | 13.86±0.11Aa | 10.86±2.71Ba | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
16 | 11.34±0.31Aa | 10.74±0.40Aa | 1.76±1.76Bc | 0.00±0.00Bb | 0.00±0.00Bb | 0.00±0.00Bb | 0.00±0.00Bb | 0.00±0.00Bb | |
根鲜重 Root weight (g·plant-1) | 10 | 1.97±0.05Aa | 1.79±0.03Ba | 1.47±0.08Da | 1.63±0.06Ca | 1.46±0.04Da | 1.05±0.07Ea | 0.43±0.03Fa | 0.17±0.04Ga |
12 | 1.72±0.09Ab | 1.67±0.06Aa | 0.81±0.25Bb | 0.20±0.04Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
16 | 1.86±0.06Aab | 0.70±0.04Bb | 0.02±0.02Cc | 0.00±0.00Cc | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
幼苗活力指数 Seedling vigor index | 10 | 15.62±0.24ABab | 16.63±0.20Aa | 14.27±0.88BCa | 14.99±0.40Ba | 13.24±0.41Ca | 10.06±0.67Da | 4.47±0.49Ea | 2.50±0.41Fa |
12 | 15.07±0.45Ab | 15.19±0.41Ab | 10.58±0.82Bb | 1.49±0.51Cb | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | |
16 | 16.84±0.40Aa | 5.74±0.33Bc | 0.11±0.11Cc | 0.00±0.00Cc | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb |
Table 1 Changes of seedling growth of S. bicolor×S. sudanense seeds with different moisture contents after deterioration
指标 Index | 含水量 Moisture content (%) | 劣变时间Deterioration time | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 4 d | 8 d | 12 d | 16 d | 20 d | 24 d | 28 d | ||
苗长 Shoot length (cm) | 10 | 7.62±0.12Aa | 7.60±0.19Aa | 6.70±0.09ABa | 6.62±0.17ABa | 5.88±0.17ABa | 6.08±0.14ABa | 4.56±0.08Ba | 5.03±0.18Ba |
12 | 7.64±0.15Aa | 7.43±0.11Aa | 6.12±0.15Ba | 6.22±0.35Ba | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
16 | 7.69±0.18Aa | 5.89±0.20Bb | 0.84±0.84Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
苗鲜重 Shoot weight (g·plant-1) | 10 | 2.46±0.06Aa | 2.54±0.07Aa | 1.99±0.09Ba | 2.08±0.09Ba | 1.72±0.06Ca | 1.34±0.10Da | 0.52±0.05Ea | 0.21±0.06Fa |
12 | 2.28±0.12Aa | 2.13±0.07Ab | 1.29±0.09Bb | 0.28±0.08Cb | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | |
16 | 2.52±0.09Aa | 0.88±0.03Bc | 0.02±0.02Cc | 0.00±0.00Cc | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
根长 Root length (cm) | 10 | 10.85±0.25Aa | 10.10±0.21Aa | 10.47±0.35Ab | 12.00±0.55Aa | 11.42±0.07Aa | 12.70±0.55Aa | 10.58±0.42Aa | 10.78±0.67Aa |
12 | 11.08±0.19ABa | 11.79±0.87ABa | 13.86±0.11Aa | 10.86±2.71Ba | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
16 | 11.34±0.31Aa | 10.74±0.40Aa | 1.76±1.76Bc | 0.00±0.00Bb | 0.00±0.00Bb | 0.00±0.00Bb | 0.00±0.00Bb | 0.00±0.00Bb | |
根鲜重 Root weight (g·plant-1) | 10 | 1.97±0.05Aa | 1.79±0.03Ba | 1.47±0.08Da | 1.63±0.06Ca | 1.46±0.04Da | 1.05±0.07Ea | 0.43±0.03Fa | 0.17±0.04Ga |
12 | 1.72±0.09Ab | 1.67±0.06Aa | 0.81±0.25Bb | 0.20±0.04Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
16 | 1.86±0.06Aab | 0.70±0.04Bb | 0.02±0.02Cc | 0.00±0.00Cc | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | |
幼苗活力指数 Seedling vigor index | 10 | 15.62±0.24ABab | 16.63±0.20Aa | 14.27±0.88BCa | 14.99±0.40Ba | 13.24±0.41Ca | 10.06±0.67Da | 4.47±0.49Ea | 2.50±0.41Fa |
12 | 15.07±0.45Ab | 15.19±0.41Ab | 10.58±0.82Bb | 1.49±0.51Cb | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | 0.00±0.00Db | |
16 | 16.84±0.40Aa | 5.74±0.33Bc | 0.11±0.11Cc | 0.00±0.00Cc | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb | 0.00±0.00Cb |
变异来源 Variation source | df | 发芽率 Germination percentage | 发芽指数 Germination index | 种子活力指数 Seed vigor index | 幼苗活力指数 Seedling vigor index | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | ||
含水量Moisture content (M) | 2 | 1185.258 | 0.000 | 1418.872 | 0.000 | 447.685 | 0.000 | 1019.457 | 0.000 |
劣变时间Deterioration time (D) | 7 | 581.811 | 0.000 | 629.319 | 0.000 | 346.177 | 0.000 | 578.495 | 0.000 |
含水量×劣变时间M×D | 14 | 93.231 | 0.000 | 111.360 | 0.000 | 54.816 | 0.000 | 98.080 | 0.000 |
变异来源 Variation source | df | 苗长Shoot length | 苗鲜重Shoot weight | 根长Root length | 根鲜重Root weight | ||||
F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | ||
含水量Moisture content (M) | 2 | 869.393 | 0.000 | 832.754 | 0.000 | 250.826 | 0.000 | 433.338 | 0.000 |
劣变时间Deterioration time (D) | 7 | 383.773 | 0.000 | 571.041 | 0.000 | 60.143 | 0.000 | 272.568 | 0.000 |
含水量×劣变时间M×D | 14 | 71.827 | 0.000 | 69.387 | 0.000 | 32.157 | 0.000 | 33.280 | 0.000 |
Table 2 Two-way variance analysis of moisture content and deterioration time on seed vigor and seedling growth characteristics of S. bicolor×S. sudanense
变异来源 Variation source | df | 发芽率 Germination percentage | 发芽指数 Germination index | 种子活力指数 Seed vigor index | 幼苗活力指数 Seedling vigor index | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | ||
含水量Moisture content (M) | 2 | 1185.258 | 0.000 | 1418.872 | 0.000 | 447.685 | 0.000 | 1019.457 | 0.000 |
劣变时间Deterioration time (D) | 7 | 581.811 | 0.000 | 629.319 | 0.000 | 346.177 | 0.000 | 578.495 | 0.000 |
含水量×劣变时间M×D | 14 | 93.231 | 0.000 | 111.360 | 0.000 | 54.816 | 0.000 | 98.080 | 0.000 |
变异来源 Variation source | df | 苗长Shoot length | 苗鲜重Shoot weight | 根长Root length | 根鲜重Root weight | ||||
F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | F值F value | 显著性Sig. | ||
含水量Moisture content (M) | 2 | 869.393 | 0.000 | 832.754 | 0.000 | 250.826 | 0.000 | 433.338 | 0.000 |
劣变时间Deterioration time (D) | 7 | 383.773 | 0.000 | 571.041 | 0.000 | 60.143 | 0.000 | 272.568 | 0.000 |
含水量×劣变时间M×D | 14 | 71.827 | 0.000 | 69.387 | 0.000 | 32.157 | 0.000 | 33.280 | 0.000 |
1 | Yan H F, Xia F S, Mao P S. Research progress of seed aging and vigor repair. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(3): 20-26. |
闫慧芳, 夏方山, 毛培胜. 种子老化及活力修复研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(3): 20-26. | |
2 | Walters C, Wheeler L M, Grotenhuis J M. Longevity of seeds stored in a genebank: Species characteristics. Seed Science Research, 2005, 15(1): 1-20. |
3 | Yu H B, Liu Z, Wu Y J, et al. Selection and application of accelerated aging method for maize seeds. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 27(3): 672-674. |
余海兵, 刘正, 吴跃进, 等. 玉米种子人工加速老化方法的选择. 江苏农业学报, 2011, 27(3): 672-674. | |
4 | McDonald M B. Seed deterioration: Physiology, repair and assessment. Seed Science and Technology, 1999, 27(1): 177-237. |
5 | Yang H, Liu H F, Yang H L, et al. Effect of storage temperature and moisture content on the seed’s quality of Agropyron cristatum. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(10): 2033-2040. |
杨晗, 刘鸿飞, 杨合龙, 等. 贮藏温度和种子含水量对扁穗冰草种子质量的影响. 草业科学, 2016, 33(10): 2033-2040. | |
6 | Lehner A, Mamadou N, Poels P, et al. Changes in soluble carbohydrates, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme activities in the embryo during ageing in wheat grains. Journal of Cereal Science, 2008, 47(3): 555-565. |
7 | Oba G C, Goneli A L D, Masetto T E, et al. Artificial drying of safflower seeds at different air temperatures: Effect on the physiological potential of freshly harvested and stored seeds. Journal of Seed Science, 2019, 41(4): 397-406. |
8 | Han J G, Mao P S. Forage seed science (The Second Edition). Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2011. |
韩建国, 毛培胜. 牧草种子学(第2版). 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2011. | |
9 | Chen Q Z, Mao P S, Kong L Q, et al. Effect of deterioration time and deterioration temperature on vigor of oat (Avena sativa L.) seeds with different moisture content. Seed, 2016, 35(11): 31-35. |
陈泉竹, 毛培胜, 孔令琪, 等. 劣变时间和温度对不同含水量燕麦种子的活力影响. 种子, 2016, 35(11): 31-35. | |
10 | Yang C, Li W S, Huang D, et al. Effect of storage temperature on vigor of sweet clover seed under different moisture content conditions. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(2): 251-257. |
杨超, 李宛姝, 黄丹, 等. 贮藏温度对不同含水量草木樨种子活力影响的研究. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 251-257. | |
11 | Zhu P, Kong L Q, Li G, et al. Effect of moisture content on physiological characteristics of Elymus sibiricus seed under different storage temperature conditions. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(6): 101-108. |
朱萍, 孔令琪, 李高, 等. 贮藏温度对不同含水量老芒麦种子生理特性的影响. 草业学报, 2011, 20(6): 101-108. | |
12 | Mira S, Estrelles E, Gonzálezbenito M E. Effect of water content and temperature on seed longevity of seven Brassicaceae species after 5 years of storage. Plant Biology, 2015, 17(1): 153-162. |
13 | Chen L L, Cheng H, Zhang Y Y, et al. Study on viability and physiological characteristics of Aohan alfalfa seeds with different storage time. Seed, 2017, 36(3): 23-27. |
陈玲玲, 程航, 张阳阳, 等. 不同贮藏年限敖汉苜蓿种子活力及生理特性的研究. 种子, 2017, 36(3): 23-27. | |
14 | Wang Y, Xu C B, Han L. Studies on seed vigor and physiological indicators of different storage duration Elymus sibiricus L. Seed, 2012, 31(8): 14-17. |
王勇, 徐春波, 韩磊. 不同贮藏年限老芒麦种子活力研究. 种子, 2012, 31(8): 14-17. | |
15 | Yan H F, Mao P S. Optimizing the accelerated ageing condition of Siberian wildrye seeds. Seed, 2013, 32(7): 1-6. |
闫慧芳, 毛培胜. 老芒麦种子人工加速老化条件的筛选比较. 种子, 2013, 32(7): 1-6. | |
16 | Qin Y Y, Zhang H P, Luo F C, et al. Seasonal dynamics of seed vigor and nutrient contents of Setaria sphacelata cv. Narok during natural storage. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(15): 139-141. |
秦源源, 张桓溥, 罗富成, 等. 自然储藏过程中纳罗克非洲狗尾草种子活力及其营养含量动态. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(15): 139-141. | |
17 | Zhang X Y, Zhao L, Anaer, et al. Effect of controlling deterioration on physiological characteristics of Leymus chinensis seed with different moisture contents. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20(5): 899-906. |
张晓媛, 赵利, 阿那尔, 等. 控制劣变对不同含水量羊草种子生理特性的影响. 草地学报, 2012, 20(5): 899-906. | |
18 | Wang Y Q, Yuan L. Activation of insoluble phosphorus and its absorption by Sorghum dochna, Sorghum hybrid Sudan grass, and Dolichos lablab. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(10): 33-43. |
王亚麒, 袁玲. 甜高粱、高丹草和拉巴豆对难溶性磷的活化与吸收. 草业学报, 2019, 28(10): 33-43. | |
19 | Liang H, You Y L, Li Y, et al. Research progress on ensiling and feeding technology of Sorghum-sudangrass hybrids. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(5): 936-943. |
梁欢, 游永亮, 李源, 等. 高丹草青贮加工及饲喂利用技术研究进展. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5): 936-943. | |
20 | Yu Z, Xie R, Yu X X, et al. SSR analysis of sorghum-sudangrass new strains with low hydrocyanic acid content. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(1): 223-228. |
于卓, 谢锐, 于肖夏, 等. 低氢氰酸含量高丹草新品系及其亲本的SSR分析. 草业学报, 2014, 23(1): 223-228. | |
21 | Jin W W, Zhang H H, Teng Z Y, et al. Effects of salt and alkali interaction stress on chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves of Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(10): 2090-2098. |
金微微, 张会慧, 滕志远, 等. 盐碱互作胁迫对高丹草叶片叶绿素荧光参数的影响. 草业科学, 2017, 34(10): 2090-2098. | |
22 | Ding J N, Zhang H H, Chi D F. Response of photosynthesis in leaves of Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense seedlings to phenanthrene polluted soils. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(9): 1732-1738. |
丁俊男, 张会慧, 迟德富. 土壤菲胁迫对高丹草幼苗叶片光合机构功能的影响. 草业科学, 2014, 31(9): 1732-1738. | |
23 | Du Z H, Yan X, Zuo Y C, et al. Creating forage maize new germplasm by introducing genome total DNA from Sorghum bicolor×Sorghum sudanense into maize inbred line through pollen-tube pathway. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 48(12): 141-144. |
杜周和, 严旭, 左艳春, 等. 花粉管通道转高丹草总DNA创制饲草玉米新种质. 江苏农业科学, 2020, 48(12): 141-144. | |
24 | Niu Y Q Q, Yu X X, Yu Z, et al. SSR analysis of varieties and new strains of the Mengnong series Sorghum-sudangrass. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(5): 1-6. |
牛亚青青, 于肖夏, 于卓, 等. 高丹草品种及新品系的SSR分析. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(5): 1-6. | |
25 | He Z F, He C G, Wang G D. Effect of different cultivation patterns on yield and nutritional contents of photoperiod-sensitive sorghum-sudangrass hybrids. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(9): 110-122. |
何振富, 贺春贵, 王国栋. 栽培方式对光敏型高丹草营养成分含量与产量的影响. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 110-122. | |
26 | He Z F, He C G, Wang G D, et al. Effect of planting density on plant nutrients and their dynamics in PPS sorghum-sudangrass hybrids. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(10): 93-104. |
何振富, 贺春贵, 王国栋, 等. 种植密度对光敏型高丹草营养成分及动态变化的影响. 草业学报, 2018, 27(10): 93-104. | |
27 | He C G, He Z F, Wang F. Efficient double cropping pattern of photoperiod-sensitive sorghum-sudangrass hybrids in summer after winter wheat. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(5): 70-80. |
贺春贵, 何振富, 王斐. 光敏型高丹草复种穴播高效栽培模式研究. 草业学报, 2017, 26(5): 70-80. | |
28 | Dong W C, Zhang G J, Zhang H, et al. Research on production performance and feeding value of brown midrib (BMR) Sorghum×Sudan grass in Ningxia Yellow River irrigation area. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(1): 45-50. |
董文成, 张桂杰, 张欢, 等. 宁夏黄灌区不同高丹草品种的生产性能和饲用价值研究. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(1): 45-50. | |
29 | Yang H, Tian J P, Liu G B, et al. Comparison of quality and nutritional value of Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense in different positions of the bucket. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(10): 1682-1686. |
杨红, 田吉鹏, 刘贵波, 等. 青贮容器不同部位高丹草青贮饲料的营养价值. 草业科学, 2015, 32(10): 1682-1686. | |
30 | Wang Y Y, Mao P S. Effect of ageing duration and temperature on the germination percentage of Sorghum bicolor×S. sudanense seeds. China Dairy Cattle, 2014(11): 17-21. |
王媛媛, 毛培胜. 老化时间和温度对高丹草种子发芽率的影响. 中国奶牛, 2014(11): 17-21. | |
31 | International Seed Testing Association. International rules for seed testing. Zürich: International Seed Testing Association, 2019. |
国际种子检验协会. 国际种子检验规程. 苏黎世: 国际种子检验协会, 2019. | |
32 | Abdul-Baki A A, Anderson J D. Vigour determination in soybean seed multiple criteria. Crop Science, 1973, 13(6): 630-633. |
33 | Rajjou L, Duval M, Gallardo K, et al. Seed germination and vigor. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2012, 63: 507-533. |
34 | Dang X J, Thi T G T, Dong G S, et al. Genetic diversity and association mapping of seed vigor in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Planta, 2014, 239(6): 1309-1319. |
35 | Jin X W, Zhao G Q, Chai J K, et al. Effects of different storage years on seed vigor of oat. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(2): 54-59. |
金小雯, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 等. 不同贮藏年限对燕麦种子活力的影响. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(2): 54-59. | |
36 | He X C, Hu W M, Duan X M, et al. Analysis of long term storability of diploid watermelon ultra-dry seeds. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2017, 44(2): 307-314. |
何序晨, 胡伟民, 段宪明, 等. 西瓜超干种子的长期耐藏性分析. 园艺学报, 2017, 44(2): 307-314. | |
37 | Tangney R, Merritt D J, Fontaine J B, et al. Seed moisture content as a primary trait regulating the lethal temperature thresholds of seeds. Journal of Ecology, 2019, 107(3): 1093-1105. |
38 | Zhang J P, Wang H Y, Liao S X, et al. Appropriate ultra-low seed moisture content stabilizes the seed longevity of Calocedrus macrolepis, associated with changes in endogenous hormones, antioxidant enzymes, soluble sugars and unsaturated fatty acids. New Forests, 2019, 50(3): 455-468. |
39 | Jittanit W, Srzednicki G, Driscoll R. Corn, rice, and wheat seed drying by two-stage concept. Dry Technology, 2010, 28(6): 807-815. |
40 | Lin C, Shen H Q, Guan Y J, et al. Changes of physiological, biochemistry and gene expression related to ABA and GA3 in hybrid rice seeds stored at different moisture contents and packing methods. Plant Physiology Communications, 2017, 53(6): 1077-1086. |
林程, 沈杭琪, 关亚静, 等. 不同含水量和包装方式杂交水稻种子贮藏后生理生化及ABA 和GA3相关基因表达的变化. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(6): 1077-1086. | |
41 | Li C J, Wang Y R, Zhu T H, et al. Response of alfalfa seed to stress storage conditions. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(8): 957-961. |
李春杰, 王彦荣, 朱廷恒, 等. 紫花苜蓿种子对逆境贮藏条件的反应. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(8): 957-961. | |
42 | Zhang H B, Yang G J, Gao W D, et al. Study on the seed vigor of Toona sinensis under specific storage conditions. Forest Research, 2019, 32(2): 152-159. |
张海波, 杨桂娟, 高卫东, 等. 香椿种子特定贮藏条件下活力变化的研究. 林业科学研究, 2019, 32(2): 152-159. | |
43 | Li Y P, Cheng Q X, Xi P Z, et al. Effects of water content on storage physiology of the seed of Polygonatum sibiricum Red. Seed, 2016, 35(5): 18-23. |
李吟平, 程秋香, 席鹏洲, 等. 含水量对黄精种子贮藏生理的影响. 种子, 2016, 35(5): 18-23. | |
44 | Xia F, Chen L, Sun Y, et al. Relationships between ultrastructure of embryo cells and biochemical variations during ageing of oat (Avena sativa L.) seeds with different moisture content. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2015, 37(4): 1-11. |
[1] | Jian-xin LIU, Rui-rui LIU, Hai-yan JIA, Ting BU, Na LI. Physiological mechanism of NaHS priming improvement of seed vigor in naked oat [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(2): 135-142. |
[2] | Yu-lian GAO, Jing CHANG, Yi-hui WANG, Feng LI, Hai-ping LI, Chong-yong MA. Allelopathic effects of Stellera chamaejasme on seed germination and growth of three crops [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(10): 83-91. |
[3] | LEI En, SHAO Di, ZHU Tian-biao, SHU Xing, YANG Yong-bing, WANG Yue-dong, TANG Qi-yuan. Role of grain crushing resistance and grain threshing characteristics in determining suitability of feed maize cultivars for machine harvesting and effect of plant moisture content [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(9): 125-135. |
[4] | LI Feng-lan, WU Jia-wen, YAO Shu-kuan, ZHAO Zi-yi, ZHAO Xiao-can, HE Fu-meng, ZHU Yuan-fang, SHI Qi-hai, ZHOU Lei, XU Yong-qing. A study of the allelopathic effect of extracts from different parts of Iva xanthiifolia on five native species [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(9): 169-178. |
[5] | CUI Xue-lian, XIA Chao. Effect of exogenous abscisic acid on seedling establishment of Epichloё gansuensis-Achnatherum inebrians symbiont [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 70-80. |
[6] | LIANG Jun, QUAN Xiao-long, ZHANG Jie-xue, SHI Hui-lan, DUAN Zhong-hua, QIAO You-ming. Potential allelopathic effects of water extracts of three grasses on germination of their own seeds and seedling growth [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 81-89. |
[7] | Yong HUANG, Meng GUO, Hong-rui ZHANG, Yan ZHOU, He-min LI, Zhi-ming GAO, Pan-pan WANG. Effects of salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of carnation [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(12): 105-111. |
[8] | Ju-hong WANG, Sheng-jing SHI, Wen CHEN, Gui-mei GAN, Sai-na CHEN, Zhang-wei LI. Effects of Bacillus subtilis and three actinomycetes on seed germination and seedling growth of Bidens pilosa and Eclipta prostrata under salt stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(12): 112-120. |
[9] | Ting-yan MA, Yan-zhong LI. Species and pathogenicity of seed-borne fungi in 32 varieties of alfalfa [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(12): 131-139. |
[10] | WANG Fei, YIN Fei, LONG Hao-qiang, LI Xue, WU Yan-yan, JIAO Nian-yuan, MA Chao, FU Guo-zhan. Photochemical activity in flag leaves of winter wheat when following maize, peanut, or a maize-peanut intercrop in a crop rotation [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(7): 123-131. |
[11] | YAO Shu-kuan, LI Feng-lan, PENG Li-na, FENG Xu, DONG Jia-min, FENG Zhe, ZHANG Jun-feng, ZHAO Qiao-qin, FENG Shan-shan, XU Yong-qing, HU Bao-zhong. A study of the allelopathic effect of extracts from different parts of Iva xanthiifolia on five Brassicaceae species [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(9): 56-66. |
[12] | LI Lei-lei, HUA Deng-feng, ZHENG Xing-wei, LI Cong. Effects of moisture content and sowing-mix ratio on the quality of baled oat and common vetch/hairy vetch silage mixtures in the pastoral area of southern Qinghai [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(7): 166-174. |
[13] | MI Yong-wei, WANG Guo-xiang, GONG Cheng-wen, CAI Zi-ping, WU Wei-guo. Effects of salt stress on growth and physiology of Isatis indigotica seedlings [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(6): 43-51. |
[14] | SUN Qiu-jin, LÜ Yan-yan, HAN Yun-hua, WANG Yan-rong. Study of the semipermeable characteristics of Sorghum bicolor×Sorghum sudanense seeds [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(5): 162-169. |
[15] | DONG Qiu-li, XIA Fang-shan, LI Xiao-yu, WANG Ming-ya, MAO Pei-sheng, ZHU Hui-sen,TONG Li-rong, DU Li-xia. Effect of ascorbic acid priming on the vigor of oat seeds under NaCl stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(4): 202-208. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||