Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 81-89.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020464
Previous Articles Next Articles
Fei WANG(), Cai-ling LIU, Chun-mei HE, Qing-hua LI, Yu-jie LIU, Yi-bin HUANG
Received:
2020-10-14
Revised:
2020-02-09
Online:
2021-11-11
Published:
2021-11-11
Fei WANG, Cai-ling LIU, Chun-mei HE, Qing-hua LI, Yu-jie LIU, Yi-bin HUANG. Appropriate ratios of phosphate and potassium fertilizers and 50% return of rice straw enhanced yield and nutrient capture of Chinese milk vetch[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(12): 81-89.
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 株数 Strains number (×104·hm-2) | 分枝数 Branches number (No.·plant-1) | 总分枝数 Total branches number (×104·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P0K0 | 115.5±1.8c | 5.11±0.14abcde | 281.3±6.3a | 1.03±0.05ab | 289.6±260.2a |
P0K15 | 119.1±2.7abc | 5.41±0.18a | 279.2±19.1a | 1.00±0.00b | 279.2±190.9a |
P0K30 | 122.7±9.1a | 5.30±0.10ab | 295.8±19.1a | 1.01±0.02ab | 300.0±250.0a |
P0KS | 117.0±2.9abc | 5.33±0.18a | 283.3±26.0a | 1.00±0.00b | 283.3±260.0a |
P15K0 | 119.0±8.0abc | 4.99±0.02bcde | 295.8±7.2a | 1.01±0.03ab | 300.0±248.3a |
P15K15 | 121.8±6.8ab | 5.17±0.30abcd | 304.2±26.0a | 1.01±0.02ab | 308.3±288.7a |
P15K30 | 117.3±5.1abc | 5.25±0.13abc | 291.7±43.9a | 1.01±0.03ab | 295.8±239.0a |
P15KS | 117.8±0.8abc | 5.13±0.08abcd | 283.3±57.7a | 1.05±0.09a | 295.8±205.2a |
P30K0 | 117.2±0.6abc | 4.94±0.40cde | 275.0±12.5a | 1.00±0.00b | 275.0±125.0a |
P30K15 | 117.2±1.1abc | 4.83±0.05de | 287.5±21.7a | 1.00±0.00b | 287.5±216.5a |
P30K30 | 116.2±2.0bc | 4.86±0.33de | 300.0±12.5a | 1.00±0.00b | 300.0±125.0a |
P30KS | 118.0±0.4abc | 4.79±0.33e | 275.0±21.7a | 1.00±0.00b | 275.0±216.5a |
Table 1 Agronomic characteristics of Chinese milk vetch for different ratios of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers at full-bloom stage
处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 株数 Strains number (×104·hm-2) | 分枝数 Branches number (No.·plant-1) | 总分枝数 Total branches number (×104·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
P0K0 | 115.5±1.8c | 5.11±0.14abcde | 281.3±6.3a | 1.03±0.05ab | 289.6±260.2a |
P0K15 | 119.1±2.7abc | 5.41±0.18a | 279.2±19.1a | 1.00±0.00b | 279.2±190.9a |
P0K30 | 122.7±9.1a | 5.30±0.10ab | 295.8±19.1a | 1.01±0.02ab | 300.0±250.0a |
P0KS | 117.0±2.9abc | 5.33±0.18a | 283.3±26.0a | 1.00±0.00b | 283.3±260.0a |
P15K0 | 119.0±8.0abc | 4.99±0.02bcde | 295.8±7.2a | 1.01±0.03ab | 300.0±248.3a |
P15K15 | 121.8±6.8ab | 5.17±0.30abcd | 304.2±26.0a | 1.01±0.02ab | 308.3±288.7a |
P15K30 | 117.3±5.1abc | 5.25±0.13abc | 291.7±43.9a | 1.01±0.03ab | 295.8±239.0a |
P15KS | 117.8±0.8abc | 5.13±0.08abcd | 283.3±57.7a | 1.05±0.09a | 295.8±205.2a |
P30K0 | 117.2±0.6abc | 4.94±0.40cde | 275.0±12.5a | 1.00±0.00b | 275.0±125.0a |
P30K15 | 117.2±1.1abc | 4.83±0.05de | 287.5±21.7a | 1.00±0.00b | 287.5±216.5a |
P30K30 | 116.2±2.0bc | 4.86±0.33de | 300.0±12.5a | 1.00±0.00b | 300.0±125.0a |
P30KS | 118.0±0.4abc | 4.79±0.33e | 275.0±21.7a | 1.00±0.00b | 275.0±216.5a |
处理 Treatment | 鲜草产量 Fresh yield | 干草产量 Dry yield |
---|---|---|
P0K0 | 35.98±2.46c | 4.36±0.28c |
P0K15 | 37.39±2.41abc | 4.48±0.23bc |
P0K30 | 38.97±3.53abc | 4.45±0.38bc |
P0KS | 39.40±3.40abc | 4.69±0.36abc |
P15K0 | 36.46±2.88bc | 4.42±0.48bc |
P15K15 | 39.20±5.74abc | 4.54±0.60abc |
P15K30 | 40.22±5.34a | 4.95±0.35ab |
P15KS | 40.58±6.46a | 4.80±0.21abc |
P30K0 | 37.22±3.40abc | 4.62±0.02abc |
P30K15 | 38.51±1.95abc | 5.02±0.21a |
P30K30 | 39.90±3.90ab | 4.71±0.24abc |
P30KS | 40.16±2.94a | 4.93±0.24ab |
Table 2 Yield of Chinese milk vetch for different ratios of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers at full-bloom stage (t·hm-2)
处理 Treatment | 鲜草产量 Fresh yield | 干草产量 Dry yield |
---|---|---|
P0K0 | 35.98±2.46c | 4.36±0.28c |
P0K15 | 37.39±2.41abc | 4.48±0.23bc |
P0K30 | 38.97±3.53abc | 4.45±0.38bc |
P0KS | 39.40±3.40abc | 4.69±0.36abc |
P15K0 | 36.46±2.88bc | 4.42±0.48bc |
P15K15 | 39.20±5.74abc | 4.54±0.60abc |
P15K30 | 40.22±5.34a | 4.95±0.35ab |
P15KS | 40.58±6.46a | 4.80±0.21abc |
P30K0 | 37.22±3.40abc | 4.62±0.02abc |
P30K15 | 38.51±1.95abc | 5.02±0.21a |
P30K30 | 39.90±3.90ab | 4.71±0.24abc |
P30KS | 40.16±2.94a | 4.93±0.24ab |
用肥量 Fertilizer amount | 鲜草Fresh grass | 干草Dry grass | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
产量Yield (t·hm-2) | F | 产量Yield (t·hm-2) | F | |
P0 | 37.93a | 13.0** | 4.50b | 4.0 |
P15 | 39.11a | 4.68ab | ||
P30 | 38.95a | 4.82a | ||
K0 | 36.55b | 59.9** | 4.47b | 2.3 |
K15 | 38.37ab | 4.68ab | ||
K30 | 39.69a | 4.70ab | ||
Ks | 40.04a | 4.81a | ||
P×K | 0.1 | 0.8 |
Table 3 Analysis of variance of Chinese milk vetch yield under different conditions of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers
用肥量 Fertilizer amount | 鲜草Fresh grass | 干草Dry grass | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
产量Yield (t·hm-2) | F | 产量Yield (t·hm-2) | F | |
P0 | 37.93a | 13.0** | 4.50b | 4.0 |
P15 | 39.11a | 4.68ab | ||
P30 | 38.95a | 4.82a | ||
K0 | 36.55b | 59.9** | 4.47b | 2.3 |
K15 | 38.37ab | 4.68ab | ||
K30 | 39.69a | 4.70ab | ||
Ks | 40.04a | 4.81a | ||
P×K | 0.1 | 0.8 |
处理Treatment | N | P2O5 | K2O |
---|---|---|---|
P0K0 | 24.72±0.59de | 5.48±0.21abc | 27.84±4.10b |
P0K15 | 25.50±1.23cde | 4.76±0.75c | 28.75±2.85ab |
P0K30 | 27.43±1.76a | 5.95±0.54a | 32.47±4.67a |
P0KS | 26.18±1.31abcd | 5.32±0.58abc | 27.46±6.81b |
P15K0 | 27.40±0.89a | 5.63±0.42abc | 27.22±3.48b |
P15K15 | 25.71±1.67bcde | 5.59±0.44abc | 32.56±2.94a |
P15K30 | 25.86±1.64abcd | 5.56±0.19abc | 30.71±2.34ab |
P15KS | 26.38±1.14abc | 5.73±0.56ab | 29.54±5.52ab |
P30K0 | 26.06±2.09abcd | 5.90±0.88a | 29.32±1.57ab |
P30K15 | 24.17±0.19e | 4.89±0.39bc | 29.79±2.08ab |
P30K30 | 27.31±0.57ab | 6.03±0.26a | 32.70±1.31a |
P30KS | 26.40±1.03abc | 5.37±0.44abc | 28.03±1.18b |
Table 4 Nutrient content of Chinese milk vetch for different ratios of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers (g·kg-1)
处理Treatment | N | P2O5 | K2O |
---|---|---|---|
P0K0 | 24.72±0.59de | 5.48±0.21abc | 27.84±4.10b |
P0K15 | 25.50±1.23cde | 4.76±0.75c | 28.75±2.85ab |
P0K30 | 27.43±1.76a | 5.95±0.54a | 32.47±4.67a |
P0KS | 26.18±1.31abcd | 5.32±0.58abc | 27.46±6.81b |
P15K0 | 27.40±0.89a | 5.63±0.42abc | 27.22±3.48b |
P15K15 | 25.71±1.67bcde | 5.59±0.44abc | 32.56±2.94a |
P15K30 | 25.86±1.64abcd | 5.56±0.19abc | 30.71±2.34ab |
P15KS | 26.38±1.14abc | 5.73±0.56ab | 29.54±5.52ab |
P30K0 | 26.06±2.09abcd | 5.90±0.88a | 29.32±1.57ab |
P30K15 | 24.17±0.19e | 4.89±0.39bc | 29.79±2.08ab |
P30K30 | 27.31±0.57ab | 6.03±0.26a | 32.70±1.31a |
P30KS | 26.40±1.03abc | 5.37±0.44abc | 28.03±1.18b |
用肥量 Fertilizer amount | N | P2O5 | K2O | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
含量 Content (g·kg-1) | F | 含量 Content (g·kg-1) | F | 含量 Content (g·kg-1) | F | |
P0 | 25.96a | 0.2 | 5.38a | 0.7 | 29.13a | 0.5 |
P15 | 26.34a | 5.63a | 30.01a | |||
P30 | 25.98a | 5.55a | 29.96a | |||
K0 | 26.06ab | 1.5 | 5.67a | 3.3 | 28.13b | 4.6* |
K15 | 25.13b | 5.08b | 30.37ab | |||
K30 | 26.86a | 5.84a | 31.96a | |||
Ks | 26.32a | 5.48ab | 28.34b | |||
P×K | 3.2* | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Table 5 Analysis of variance of nutrient content of Chinese milk vetch under different conditions of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers
用肥量 Fertilizer amount | N | P2O5 | K2O | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
含量 Content (g·kg-1) | F | 含量 Content (g·kg-1) | F | 含量 Content (g·kg-1) | F | |
P0 | 25.96a | 0.2 | 5.38a | 0.7 | 29.13a | 0.5 |
P15 | 26.34a | 5.63a | 30.01a | |||
P30 | 25.98a | 5.55a | 29.96a | |||
K0 | 26.06ab | 1.5 | 5.67a | 3.3 | 28.13b | 4.6* |
K15 | 25.13b | 5.08b | 30.37ab | |||
K30 | 26.86a | 5.84a | 31.96a | |||
Ks | 26.32a | 5.48ab | 28.34b | |||
P×K | 3.2* | 1.0 | 1.0 |
处理Treatment | N | P2O5 | K2O |
---|---|---|---|
P0K0 | 107.8±4.4c | 23.9±0.6ab | 122.2±25.5de |
P0K15 | 114.2±1.3bc | 21.5±4.3b | 129.2±17.7bcde |
P0K30 | 121.8±7.4ab | 26.4±2.3ab | 145.5±29.9abcd |
P0KS | 122.6±3.4ab | 24.8±1.0ab | 128.1±27.5cde |
P15K0 | 121.0±10.4abc | 24.8±2.7ab | 121.3±26.3e |
P15K15 | 116.7±17.5abc | 25.5±5.1ab | 146.7±10.4abc |
P15K30 | 127.6±6.8ab | 27.5±1.7a | 152.4±22.4ab |
P15KS | 126.5±4.3ab | 27.4±2.2a | 140.9±20.4abcde |
P30K0 | 120.4±9.8abc | 27.2±4.0a | 135.4±7.9abcde |
P30K15 | 121.4±4.2abc | 24.6±2.9ab | 149.5±9.8abc |
P30K30 | 128.5±4.1a | 28.4±2.4a | 153.9±5.9a |
P30KS | 130.0±8.3a | 26.5±3.5ab | 138.2±12.0abcde |
Table 6 Nutrient capture of Chinese milk vetch for different ratios of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers (kg·hm-2)
处理Treatment | N | P2O5 | K2O |
---|---|---|---|
P0K0 | 107.8±4.4c | 23.9±0.6ab | 122.2±25.5de |
P0K15 | 114.2±1.3bc | 21.5±4.3b | 129.2±17.7bcde |
P0K30 | 121.8±7.4ab | 26.4±2.3ab | 145.5±29.9abcd |
P0KS | 122.6±3.4ab | 24.8±1.0ab | 128.1±27.5cde |
P15K0 | 121.0±10.4abc | 24.8±2.7ab | 121.3±26.3e |
P15K15 | 116.7±17.5abc | 25.5±5.1ab | 146.7±10.4abc |
P15K30 | 127.6±6.8ab | 27.5±1.7a | 152.4±22.4ab |
P15KS | 126.5±4.3ab | 27.4±2.2a | 140.9±20.4abcde |
P30K0 | 120.4±9.8abc | 27.2±4.0a | 135.4±7.9abcde |
P30K15 | 121.4±4.2abc | 24.6±2.9ab | 149.5±9.8abc |
P30K30 | 128.5±4.1a | 28.4±2.4a | 153.9±5.9a |
P30KS | 130.0±8.3a | 26.5±3.5ab | 138.2±12.0abcde |
用肥量 Fertilizer amount | N | P2O5 | K2O | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总量Total (kg·hm-2) | F | 总量Total (kg·hm-2) | F | 总量Total (kg·hm-2) | F | |
P0 | 116.6b | 13.0** | 24.1b | 8.5* | 131.3b | 7.5* |
P15 | 122.9ab | 26.3ab | 140.3ab | |||
P30 | 125.1a | 26.7a | 144.3a | |||
K0 | 116.4b | 14.4** | 25.3ab | 7.6* | 126.3c | 13.2** |
K15 | 117.4b | 23.9b | 141.8ab | |||
K30 | 126.0a | 27.4a | 150.6a | |||
Ks | 126.3a | 26.3ab | 135.8bc | |||
P×K | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
Table 7 Analysis of variance of nutrient capture of Chinese milk vetch for different ratios of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers
用肥量 Fertilizer amount | N | P2O5 | K2O | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
总量Total (kg·hm-2) | F | 总量Total (kg·hm-2) | F | 总量Total (kg·hm-2) | F | |
P0 | 116.6b | 13.0** | 24.1b | 8.5* | 131.3b | 7.5* |
P15 | 122.9ab | 26.3ab | 140.3ab | |||
P30 | 125.1a | 26.7a | 144.3a | |||
K0 | 116.4b | 14.4** | 25.3ab | 7.6* | 126.3c | 13.2** |
K15 | 117.4b | 23.9b | 141.8ab | |||
K30 | 126.0a | 27.4a | 150.6a | |||
Ks | 126.3a | 26.3ab | 135.8bc | |||
P×K | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.4 |
1 | Xu Y, Yang F, Zhang W F, et al. Status and problems of chemical fertilizer application in crop plantations of China from 2014 to 2016. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(1): 11-21. |
徐洋, 杨帆, 张卫峰, 等. 2014-2016 年我国种植业化肥施用状况及问题. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(1): 11-21. | |
2 | Chen G, Zhang H M, Shen Y Q, et al. Influence of incorporation of green manure, wheat straw and chemical fertilizer on rice growth and fertility of purple clay-based paddy soil. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2015, 27(10): 1797-1801. |
陈贵, 张红梅, 沈亚强, 等. 绿肥和小麦秸秆与化肥配施对水稻生长和青紫泥土壤肥力的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2015, 27(10): 1797-1801. | |
3 | Li Q K, Zhu Z L, Yu T R. Fertilizer issues in the sustainable development of agriculture in China. Nanchang: Jiangxi Science and Technology Press, 1998. |
李庆逵, 朱兆良, 于天仁. 中国农业持续发展中的肥料问题. 南昌: 江西科学技术出版社, 1998. | |
4 | Yang Y H, Zhang S, Wang S, et al.Yield and nutrient concentration in common green manure crops and assessment of potential for nitrogen replacement in different regions of China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 39-55. |
杨叶华, 张松, 王帅, 等. 中国不同区域常见绿肥产量和养分含量特征及替代氮肥潜力评估. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 39-55. | |
5 | Hu X Y, Zeng X B, Ye Z H. The constitution of bio-fertilizer resources and its current status of developing and utilization in China. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2000(6): 36-39. |
胡学玉, 曾希柏, 叶志华. 中国生物肥料资源构成及开发利用. 湖北农业科学, 2000(6): 36-39. | |
6 | Wang Y Q, Gao S J, Cao W D, et al. Fertility and nitrification characteristics of two typical paddy soils after application of milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus) for 8 years. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(2): 180-189. |
王艳秋, 高嵩涓, 曹卫东, 等. 多年冬种紫云英对两种典型双季稻田土壤肥力及硝化特征的影响. 草业学报, 2017, 26(2): 180-189. | |
7 | Xie Z J, Zhou C H, He Y Q, et al. A review of Astragalus sinicus in paddy fields in South China since 2000s. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(8): 185-196. |
谢志坚, 周春火, 贺亚琴, 等. 21世纪我国稻区种植紫云英的研究现状及展望. 草业学报, 2018, 27(8): 185-196. | |
8 | Zhou G P, Xie Z J, Cao W D, et al. Co-incorporation of high rice stubble and Chinese milk vetch improving soil fertility and yield of rice. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(23): 157-162. |
周国朋, 谢志坚, 曹卫东, 等. 稻秆高茬-紫云英联合还田改善土壤肥力提高作物产量. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(23): 157-162. | |
9 | Liu W, Lu J W, Su W, et al. Effect of N, P, K fertilization on milk vetch growth, yield and nutrient accumulation. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2009(5): 49-51. |
刘威, 鲁剑巍, 苏伟, 等. 氮磷钾肥对紫云英产量及养分积累的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2009(5): 49-51. | |
10 | Zhang X M, Guo X S, Wang W J, et al. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer on growth and yield of Astragalus sinicus L. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 39(30): 18585-18586, 18694. |
张祥明, 郭熙盛, 王文军, 等. 施用氮磷钾肥对紫云英生长、产量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(30): 18585-18586, 18694. | |
11 | Lan Z M, Zhang H, Zhou S Q, et al. Effect of different fertilization on the yield of fresh grass and nutrient content by Chinese milk vetch. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2012(1): 48-52. |
兰忠明, 张辉, 周仕全, 等. 氮磷钾配施对紫云英鲜草产量、养分含量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012(1): 48-52. | |
12 | Gao S J, Zhou G P, Cao W D. Effects of milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus) as winter green manure on rice yield and rate of fertilizer application in rice paddies in South China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(12): 2115-2126. |
高嵩涓, 周国朋, 曹卫东. 南方稻田紫云英作冬绿肥的增产节肥效应与机制. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2115-2126. | |
13 | Zeng Q L, Gong C H, Xu Y S, et al. Effects of different application amounts of Chinese milk vetch on yield and yield value of rice. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2009(6): 76-77, 88. |
曾庆利, 龚春华, 徐永士, 等. 紫云英不同翻压量对水稻产量和产值的影响. 湖南农业科学, 2009(6): 76-77, 88. | |
14 | Lv Y H, Guo X Y, Li B Y, et al. Effects of the incorporation of various amounts of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) and reducing chemical fertilizer on soil fertility and rice yield. Soils and Fertilizers Sciences in China, 2017(5): 94-98. |
吕玉虎, 郭晓彦, 李本银, 等. 翻压不同量紫云英配施减量化肥对土壤肥力和水稻产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(5): 94-98. | |
15 | Liu H F, Shi M, Zou Y C. Effects of different potassium fertilizer rate on yield of Astragalus sinicus L. Tillage and Cultivation, 2014(3): 24, 38. |
刘洪峰, 石敏, 邹迎春. 钾肥不同施用量对紫云英鲜草产量的影响, 耕作与栽培, 2014(3): 24, 38. | |
16 | Su W, Lu J W, Liu W, et al. Effect of N, P and K fertilizer combination and application rate on yield of Astragalus sinicus L. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17(6): 1094-1098. |
苏伟, 鲁剑巍, 刘威, 等. 氮磷钾肥用量对紫云英产量效应的研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(6): 1094-1098. | |
17 | Pan F X, Lu J W, Li X K, et al. Effect of fertilizer amount on yield and nutrient accumulation of green manures. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(2): 156-162. |
潘福霞, 鲁剑巍, 李小坤, 等. 不同施肥量对绿肥产量和养分积累的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(2): 156-162. | |
18 | Jin T. Effects of returning rice and wheat straw to the field on soil properties and rice yield. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2017. |
金婷. 稻麦秸秆全量还田对土壤性状和水稻产量的影响. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2017. | |
19 | Gu W J, Xie K Z, Xu P Z, et al. Effects of straw returning to soil and decomposing inoculant on soil physical and chemical properties and crop yield in rice cold waterlogged field. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2015(5): 39-42. |
顾文杰, 解开治, 徐培智,等. 秸秆还田及腐熟剂对水稻冷浸田理化性状及作物产量的影响. 广东农业科学, 2015(5): 39-42. | |
20 | Hu C, Chen Y F, Qiao Y, et al. Effect of returning straw added with straw-decomposing inoculants on soil melioration in low-yielding yellow clayey soil. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2016, 22(1): 59-66. |
胡诚, 陈云峰, 乔艳, 等. 秸秆还田配施腐熟剂对低产黄泥田的改良作用. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(1): 59-66. | |
21 | Chen C L, Tu C, Chen A L, et al. Annual variation of active carbon and nitrogen contents and the related factors in red paddy soils of subtropical China. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(2): 335-345. |
陈春兰, 涂成, 陈安磊, 等. 红壤双季稻田土壤活性碳、氮周年变化及影响因素. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(2): 335-345. | |
22 | Lu R K. Soil agricultural chemical analysis method. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000: 128-129. |
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000: 128-129. | |
23 | Lan Z M, Lin X J, Zhang W G, et al. Effect of P deficiency on the emergence of Astragalus L. root exudates and mobilization of sparingly soluble phosphorus. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(8): 1521-1531. |
兰忠明, 林新坚, 张伟光, 等. 缺磷对紫云英根系分泌物产生及难溶性磷活化的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(8): 1521-1531. | |
24 | Yi M X, Chen Z, Chu Z Y, et al. Research advances in the effects of water, phosphorus and their interaction on the growth and development of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.). Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2020, 42(3): 167-174. |
羿明璇, 陈震, 储志英, 等. 磷水因子及其互作效应影响紫云英生长发育研究进展. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(3): 167-174. | |
25 | Shen S Y, Mo M Y, Zhao H X, et al. Effects of sole fertilization N, P and combined application on yield of Astragalus sinicus L. and farmland quality. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2010(5): 131-132. |
沈生元, 莫美英, 赵洪祥, 等. 氮磷肥单施和配施对紫云英产量及耕地质量的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2010(5): 131-132. | |
26 | Lin D H, Gu R S. Chinese milk vetch. Fuzhou: Fujian Science and Technology Press, 2000: 152. |
林多胡, 顾荣申. 中国紫云英. 福州: 福建科学技术出版社, 2000: 152. | |
27 | Zhu D X, Liu W, Liu X J, et al. Study on optimum application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers in Astragalus sinicus L. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 14(2): 39-42. |
朱德雄, 刘威, 刘学军, 等. 紫云英氮磷钾肥最佳施用量研究. 河北农业科学, 2010, 14(2): 39-42. | |
28 | Xiang Y Y, Wang B C, Chen Y L, et al. Experiment on the effect of phosphate and potassium fertilizer on Chinese milk vetch Ningbo Bridge. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2013(1): 91-92. |
项玉英, 王伯诚, 陈银龙, 等. 紫云英宁波大桥种磷钾肥肥效试验. 浙江农业科学, 2013(1): 91-92. | |
29 | Wang L H, Sun F, Chen C M, et al. Combined effects of aluminum and cadmium in acidified soil on root growth in rice seedlings. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2013, 32(12): 2511-2512. |
王丽红, 孙飞, 陈春梅, 等. 酸化土壤铝和镉对水稻幼苗根系生长的复合影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2013, 32(12): 2511-2512. | |
30 | Peng J G, Chen C R, Lu H D, et al. Effect of Al on the morphological and physiological characters of crop varieties with different tolerances. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1995, 15(1): 104-107. |
彭嘉桂, 陈成榕, 卢和顶, 等. 铝(Al)对不同耐性作物品种形态和生理特性的影响. 生态学报, 1995, 15(1): 104-107. | |
31 | Wang F, Lin C, Lin X J, et al. Effect of fertilizations and rhizobia inoculation on yield and nutrient uptake/accumulation of milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) in yellow paddy field. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Science, 2011, 26(4): 632-636. |
王飞, 林诚, 林新坚, 等. 不同施肥处理与接种根瘤菌对黄泥田紫云英产量及养分吸收累积的影响. 福建农业学报, 2011, 26(4): 632-636. | |
32 | Gao H J, Zhu P, Peng C, et al. Effects of partially replacement of inorganic N with organic materials on nitrogen efficiency of spring maize and soil inorganic nitrogen content under the same N input. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(2): 318-325. |
高洪军, 朱平, 彭畅, 等. 等氮条件下长期有机无机配施对春玉米的氮素吸收利用和土壤无机氮的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(2): 318-325. | |
33 | Xu G W, Yang L N, Wang Z Q, et al. Effects of wheat-residue application and site-specific nitrogen management on absorption and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in rice plants. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(8): 1424-1434. |
徐国伟, 杨立年, 王志琴, 等. 麦秸还田与实地氮肥管理对水稻氮磷钾吸收利用的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34(8): 1424-1434. | |
34 | Zeng Y H, Fan C G, Wu J F, et al. Replacement ratio of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer by straw incorporation in early rice under the same nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium input. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(3): 658-668. |
曾研华, 范呈根, 吴建富, 等. 等养分条件下稻秆还田替代双季早稻氮钾肥比例的研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(3): 658-668. | |
35 | Zeng Y H, Wu J F, Pan X H, et al. Effects of rice straw incorporation on soil physical, chemical and biological properties in double cropping paddy fields. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2013, 27(30): 150-155. |
曾研华, 吴建富, 潘晓华, 等. 稻秆原位还田对双季稻田土壤理化与生物学性状的影响. 水土保持学报, 2013, 27(30):150-155. | |
36 | Xu G W, Li S, Zhao Y F, et al. Effects of straw returning and nitrogen fertilizer application on root secretion and nitrogen utilization of rice. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(2): 140-146. |
徐国伟, 李帅, 赵永芳, 等. 秸秆还田与施氮对水稻根系分泌物及氮素利用的影响研究. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2): 140-146 . | |
37 | Liu Y Y, Bu R Y, Tang S, et al. Effect of continuous straw-Chinese milk vetch synergistic return to the field on yield, nutrient accumulation and soil fertility of double cropping rice. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(6): 1008-1016. |
刘颖颖, 卜容燕, 唐杉, 等. 连续秸秆-紫云英协同还田对双季稻产量、养分积累及土壤肥力的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(6): 1008-1016. |
[1] | Fan ZHANG, Qian YANG. Effects of co-utilization of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw on the potassium cycle and potassium balance in a paddy soil [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 72-80. |
[2] | LIU Fang, CHEN Zhen, XU Wen, CHU Zhi-ying, GUAN Yong-xiang, WU Gui-cheng, HUAN Jing, SUN Zheng-guo. Impacts of different paddy soils on nodule growth characteristics of Chinese milk vetch [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 153-161. |
[3] | ZHENG Chun-feng, LIU Chun-zeng, LI Ben-yin, Lü Yu-hu, PAN Zi-liang, CAO Wei-dong. Effects of boron foliar spray on grain-setting characteristics of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus) [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(11): 192-199. |
[4] | XIE Zhi-jian, ZHOU Chun-huo, HE Ya-qin, SONG Tao, YU Yang, WU Jia. A review of Astragalus sinicus in paddy fields in south China since 2000s [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(8): 185-196. |
[5] | CHANG Dan-na, LIU Chun-zeng, LI Ben-yin, LÜ Yu-hu, PAN Zi-liang, GAO Song-juan,CAO Wei?dong. Effects of incorporating Chinese milk vetch on reductive material characteristics and greenhouse gas emissions in paddy soil [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(12): 133-144. |
[6] | CHEN Yi, WANG Zheng-Yin, TANG Jing, ZHANG Xiao-Ling, YANG Dong, XIANG Hua-Hui, LI Rong. Effects of phosphate fertilizer on yield, quality and plant nutrient form in lettuce in ‘calcareous purple’ soil [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(10): 183-193. |
[7] | XIE Zhi-jian,XU Chang-xu,LIU Guang-rong,CAO Wei-dong. Effects of different doses of bensulfuron-methyl·butachlor and quinclorac on the growing environment and nutrient accumulation of Chinese milk vetch [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(5): 201-207. |
[8] | LIN Xin-jian,LAN Zhong-ming,ZHANG Hui,WANG Fei,HE Chun-mei. Organic acid composition analysis of root exudation of Chinese milk vetch genotypes [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 146-152. |
[9] | YANG Yu-hua, LI Wen-long, HUANG Peng, ZONG Jian-wei, LI Zi-zhen. Effect of potassium fertilizer and plastic film mulching on growth and size inequality in Lilium davidii var. unicolor [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(5): 217-222. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||