Promotional effects of nanoparticles on plants

doi:10.11686/cyxb2021449

Abstract

Abstract:

With global climate change and human population increase， the demand for sustainable development of plant production is more urgent. Nanotechnology is one of the most developed sciences in the 21^st century and a promising tool for sustainable agricultural development. In recent years， the applications of nanomaterials for enhancement of plant production have developed rapidly， and potential of this technology in traditional plant production has been proven. In this review， we elucidate the promotional effect of nanomaterials on plant growth and their mechanisms. We discuss developments of nanomaterial research in plant growth， including uptake and transport of nanoparticles， fertilizers and plant growth regulators effects of nano particles， nano enzyme enhancement of stress resistance and nano particle regulation of photosynthesis. Further， the challenges of nanomaterial applications in plant production and research priorities are discussed， emphasizing the need for a systematic approach to the use of nanotechnology in agriculture. We hope this paper will provide new ideas for future research on nanoparticle regulation of plant functions.

Key words: nanomaterial, plant production, nano fertilizer, nano plant growth regulator, photosynthesis

Yun-hua HAN, Su-juan MI, Xiao-qi SHI, Tian-hang ZHONG. Promotional effects of nanoparticles on plants[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 204-213.

Figures/Tables 2

References 108

1	Bijali J， Acharya K. Current trends in nano-technological interventions on plant growth and development： a review. IET Nanobiotechnology， 2020， 14（2）： 113-119.
2	Huang S W， Wang L， Liu L M， et al. Nanotechnology in agriculture， livestock， and aquaculture in China： A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development， 2015， 35（2）： 369-400.
3	Klaine S J， Alvarez P J J， Batley G E， et al. Nanomaterials in the environment： behavior， fate， bioavailability， and effects. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry， 2008， 27（9）： 1825-1851.
4	Su Y， Ashworth V， Kim C， et al. Delivery， uptake， fate， and transport of engineered nanoparticles in plants： a critical review and data analysis. Environmental Science-Nano， 2019， 6（8）： 2311-2331.
5	Wang J X， Chen C Y， Sun J， et al. Translocation of inhaled TiO₂ nanoparticles along olfactory nervous system to brain studied by synchrotron radiation X-ray fluorescence. High Energy Physics and Nuclear Physics-Chinese Edition， 2005， 29： 76-79.
6	Liu Y， Xiao Z， Chen F， et al. Metallic oxide nanomaterials act as antioxidant nanozymes in higher plants： trends， meta-analysis， and prospect. Science of the Total Environment， 2021， 780： e146578.
7	Mukhopadhyay S S. Nanotechnology in agriculture： prospects and constraints. Nanotechnology Science & Applications， 2014， 7： 63-71.
8	Rodrigues S M， Demokritou P， Dokoozlian N， et al. Nanotechnology for sustainable food production： promising opportunities and scientific challenges. Environmental Science-Nano， 2017， 4（4）： 767-781.
9	Zhang H Y， Liu Y， Shen X F， et al. Influence of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate on bioaccumulation and translocation of pyrene and 1-methylpyrene in maize （Zea mays） seedlings. Environmental Pollution， 2017， 220： 1409-1417.
10	Cano A M， Kohl K， Deleon S， et al. Determination of uptake， accumulation， and stress effects in corn （Zea mays L.） grown in single-wall carbon nanotube contaminated soil. Chemosphere， 2016， 152： e117.
11	Khodakovskaya M V， Kim B-S， Kim J N， et al. Carbon nanotubes as plant growth regulators： effects on tomato growth， reproductive system， and soil microbial community. Small， 2013， 9（1）： 115-123.
12	Wang X P， Han H Y， Liu X Q， et al. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes can enhance root elongation of wheat （Triticum aestivum） plants. Journal of Nanoparticle Research， 2012， 14： e841.
13	Lian F， Wang C R， Wang C X， et al. Variety-dependent responses of rice plants with differential cadmium accumulating capacity to cadmium telluride quantum dots （CdTe QDs）： Cadmium uptake， antioxidative enzyme activity， and gene expression. Science of the Total Environment， 2019， 697： e134083.
14	Hu L， Wan J， Zeng G M， et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the cytotoxicity of CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in Phanerochaete chrysosporium by cellular uptake and oxidative stress. Environmental Science-Nano， 2017， 4（10）： 2018-2029.
15	Li W， Zheng Y J， Zhang H R， et al. Phytotoxicity， uptake， and translocation of fluorescent carbon dots in mung bean plants. Acs Applied Materials & Interfaces， 2016， 8（31）： 19939-19945.
16	Navarro D A， Bisson M A， Aga D S. Investigating uptake of water-dispersible CdSe/ZnS quantum dot nanoparticles by Arabidopsis thaliana plants. Journal of Hazardous Materials， 2012， 211（2）： 427-435.
17	Nair R， Poulose A C， Nagaoka Y， et al. Uptake of FITC labeled silica nanoparticles and quantum dots by rice seedlings： effects on seed germination and their potential as biolabels for plants. Journal of Fluorescence， 2011， 21（6）： e2057.
18	Zhang H L， Du W C， Peralta-Videa J R， et al. Metabolomics reveals how cucumber （Cucumis sativus） reprograms metabolites to cope with silver ions and silver nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress. Environmental Science & Technology， 2018， 52（14）： e8016.
19	Park S， Ahn Y J. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes and silver nanoparticles differentially affect seed germination， chlorophyll content， and hydrogen peroxide accumulation in carrot （Daucus carota L.）. Biocatalysis & Agricultural Biotechnology， 2016， 8： 257-262.
20	Tamez C， Hernandez-Molina M， Hernandez-Viezcas J A， et al. Uptake， transport， and effects of nano-copper exposure in zucchini （Cucurbita pepo）. Science of the Total Environment， 2019， 665： 100-106.
21	Lin D H， Xing B S. Root uptake and phytotoxicity of ZnO nanoparticles. Environmental Science & Technology， 2008， 42（15）： 5580-5585.
22	López-Moreno M L， De L R G， Hernández-Viezcas J A， et al. Evidence of the differential biotransformation and genotoxicity of ZnO and CeO₂ nanoparticles on soybean （Glycine max） plants. Environmental Science & Technology， 2010， 44（19）： 7315-7320.
23	Dimkpa C O， Mclean J E， Latta D E， et al. CuO and ZnO nanoparticles： phytotoxicity， metal speciation， and induction of oxidative stress in sand-grown wheat. Journal of Nanoparticle Research， 2012， 14（9）： 1-15.
24	Xu X K， Mao X P， Zhuang J， et al. PVA-coated fluorescent carbon dot nanocapsules as an optical amplifier for enhanced photosynthesis of lettuce. Acs Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering， 2020， 8（9）： 3938-3949.
25	Avellan A， Yun J， Zhang Y， et al. Nanoparticle size and coating chemistry control foliar uptake pathways， translocation， and leaf-to-rhizosphere transport in wheat. ACS Nano， 2019， 13（5）： 5291-5305.
26	Schwab F， Zhai G， Kern M， et al. Barriers， pathways and processes for uptake， translocation and accumulation of nanomaterials in plants-critical review. Nanotoxicology， 2016， 10（3）： 257-278.
27	Zhai G， Gutowski S M， Walters K S， et al. Charge， size， and cellular selectivity for multiwall carbon nanotubes by maize and soybean. Environmental Science & Technology， 2015， 49（12）： e7380.
28	Hubbard J D， Lui A， Landry M P. Multiscale and multidisciplinary approach to understanding nanoparticle transport in plants. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering， 2020， 30： 135-143.
29	Rico C M， Majumdar S， Duarte-Gardea M， et al. Interaction of nanoparticles with edible plants and their possible implications in the food chain. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry， 2011， 59（8）： 3485-3498.
30	Zhai G S， Walters K S， Peate D W， et al. Transport of gold nanoparticles through plasmodesmata and precipitation of gold ions in woody poplar. Environmental Science & Technology Letters， 2014， 1（2）： e146.
31	Wang Z Y， Xie X Y， Zhao J， et al. Xylem- and phloem-based transport of CuO nanoparticles in maize （Zea mays L.）. Environmental Science & Technology， 2012， 46（8）： 4434-4441.
32	Ma Y H， He X， Zhang P， et al. Xylem and phloem based transport of CeO₂ nanoparticles in hydroponic cucumber plants. Environmental Science & Technology， 2017， 51（9）： 5215-5221.
33	Joshi A， Kaur S， Singh P， et al. Tracking multi-walled carbon nanotubes inside oat （Avena sativa L.） plants and assessing their effect on growth， yield， and mammalian （human） cell viability. Applied Nanoscience， 2018， 8（6）： 1399-1414.
34	Chichiriccò G， Poma A. Penetration and toxicity of nanomaterials in higher plants. Nanomaterials， 2015， 5（2）： 851-873.
35	Ma C X， White J C， Zhao J， et al. Uptake of engineered nanoparticles by food crops： characterization， mechanisms， and implications. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology， 2018， 9： 129-153.
36	Banerjee K， Pramanik P， Maity A， et al. Methods of using nanomaterials to plant systems and their delivery to plants （mode of entry， uptake， translocation， accumulation， biotransformation and barriers）//Ghorbanpour M， Wani S H. Advances in Phytonanotechnology. London， UK： Academic Press， 2019： 123-152.
37	Miralles P， Church T L， Harris A T. Toxicity， uptake， and translocation of engineered nanomaterials in vascular plants. Environmental Science & Technology， 2012， 46（17）： 9224-9239.
38	Anjum N A， Rodrigo M A M， Moulick A， et al. Transport phenomena of nanoparticles in plants and animals/humans. Environmental Research， 2016， 151： 233-243.
39	Chhipa H. Nanofertilizers and nanopesticides for agriculture. Environmental Chemistry Letters， 2017， 15（1）： 15-22.
40	Subramanian K S， Manikandan A， Thirunavukkarasu M， et al. Nano-fertilizers for balanced crop nutrition//Rai M， Ribeiro C， Mattoso L， et al. Nanotechnologies in food and agriculture. Cham， Switzerland： Springer International Publishing， 2015， 3： 69-80.
41	Adisa I O， Pullagurala V L R， Peralta-Videa J R， et al. Recent advances in nano-enabled fertilizers and pesticides： a critical review of mechanisms of action. Environmental Science-Nano， 2019， 6（7）： e2002.
42	Kottegoda N， Sandaruwan C， Priyadarshana G， et al. Urea-hydroxyapatite nanohybrids for slow release of nitrogen. ACS Nano， 2017， 11（2）： 1214-1221.
43	Liu Y N， Li Y C， Peng Z P， et al. Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer management practices on wheat yields and N₂O emissions from wheat fields in North China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture， 2015， 14（6）： 1184-1191.
44	Abdel-Aziz H M M， Hasaneen M N A， Omer A M. Nano chitosan-NPK fertilizer enhances the growth and productivity of wheat plants grown in sandy soil. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research， 2016， 14（1）： e0902.
45	Deepa M， Sudhakar P， Nagamadhuri K V， et al. First evidence on phloem transport of nanoscale calcium oxide in groundnut using solution culture technique. Applied Nanoscience， 2015， 5（5）： 545-551.
46	Pradhan S， Patra P， Das S， et al. Photochemical modulation of biosafe manganese nanoparticles on Vigna radiata： a detailed molecular， biochemical， and biophysical study. Environmental Science & Technology， 2013， 47（22）： e13122.
47	Yang D Y， Li J L， Cheng Y X， et al. Compound repair effect of carbon dots and Fe²⁺ on iron deficiency in Cucumis melon L. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry， 2019， 142： 137-142.
48	Palchoudhury S， Jungjohann K L， Weerasena L， et al. Enhanced legume root growth with pre-soaking in α-Fe₂O₃ nanoparticle fertilizer. RSC Advances， 2018， 8（43）： e24075.
49	Cai L， Liu M H， Liu Z W， et al. MgO NPs can boost plant growth： evidence from increased seedling growth， morpho-physiological activities， and Mg uptake in tobacco （Nicotiana tabacum L.）. Molecules， 2018， 23（12）： e3375.
50	Singh A， Singh N B， Afzal S， et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles： a review of their biological synthesis， antimicrobial activity， uptake， translocation and biotransformation in plants. Journal of Materials Science， 2018， 53（1）： 185-201.
51	Rademacher W. Plant growth regulators： backgrounds and uses in plant production. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation， 2015， 34（4）： 845-872.
52	Qiao J， Zhao J G， Xie Q， et al. Review of effects of carbon nano-materials on crop growth. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering， 2017， 33（2）： 162-170.
	乔俊，赵建国，解谦，等. 纳米炭材料对作物生长影响的研究进展. 农业工程学报， 2017， 33（2）： 162-170.
53	Li H， Huang J， Liu Y， et al. Enhanced Rubisco activity and promoted dicotyledons growth with degradable carbon dots. Nano Research， 2019， 12（7）： 1585-1593.
54	Zhang M L， Wang H B， Liu P P， et al. Biotoxicity of degradable carbon dots towards microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. Environmental Science-Nano， 2019， 6（11）： 3316-3323.
55	Lee S M， Raja P M， Esquenazi G L， et al. Effect of raw and purified carbon nanotubes and iron oxide nanoparticles on the growth of wheatgrass prepared from the cotyledons of common wheat （Triticum aestivum）. Environmental Science-Nano， 2018， 5（1）： 103-114.
56	Sun L L， Wang R T， Ju Q， et al. Physiological， metabolic， and transcriptomic analyses reveal the responses of Arabidopsis seedlings to carbon nanohorns. Environmental Science & Technology， 2020， 54（7）： 4409-4420.
57	Wang Y， Chang C H， Ji Z X， et al. Agglomeration determines effects of carbonaceous nanomaterials on soybean nodulation， dinitrogen fixation potential， and growth in soil. ACS Nano， 2017， 11（6）： 5753-5765.
58	Yuan Z D， Zhang Z M， Wang X P， et al. Novel impacts of functionalized multi-walled carbon nanotubes in plants： promotion of nodulation and nitrogenase activity in the rhizobium-legume system. Nanoscale， 2017， 9（28）： 9921-9937.
59	Wang A W， Kang F W， Wang Z G， et al. Facile synthesis of nitrogen-rich carbon dots as fertilizers for mung bean sprouts. Advanced Sustainable Systems， 2019， 3（3）： e1800132.
60	Sankaranarayanan S， Vishnukumar P， Hariram M， et al. Hydrothermal synthesis， characterization and seed germination effects of green-emitting graphene oxide-carbon dot composite using brown macroalgal bio-oil as precursor. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology， 2019， 94（10）： 3269-3275.
61	Wang H B， Zhang M L， Song Y X， et al. Carbon dots promote the growth and photosynthesis of mung bean sprouts. Carbon， 2018， 136： 94-102.
62	Li Y D， Xu X K， Wu Y， et al. A review on the effects of carbon dots in plant systems. Materials Chemistry Frontiers， 2020， 4（2）： 437-448.
63	Choi Y， Zheng X T， Tan Y N. Bioinspired carbon dots （biodots）： emerging fluorophores with tailored multiple functionalities for biomedical， agricultural and environmental applications. Molecular Systems Design & Engineering， 2020， 5（1）： 67-90.
64	Martínez-Ballesta M C， Zapata L， Chalbi N， et al. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes enter broccoli cells enhancing growth and water uptake of plants exposed to salinity. Journal of Nanobiotechnology， 2016， 14（1）： 1-14.
65	Su L X， Ma X L， Zhao K K， et al. Carbon nanodots for enhancing the stress resistance of peanut plants. ACS Omega， 2018， 3（12）： 17770-17777.
66	Hatami M， Hadian J， Ghorbanpour M. Mechanisms underlying toxicity and stimulatory role of single-walled carbon nanotubes in Hyoscyamus niger during drought stress simulated by polyethylene glycol. Journal of Hazardous Materials， 2016， 324： 306-320.
67	Zhao L J， Zhang H L， Wang J J， et al. C60 fullerols enhance copper toxicity and alter the leaf metabolite and protein profile in cucumber. Environmental Science & Technology， 2019， 53（4）： 2171-2180.
68	Xiao L， Guo H Y， Wang S X， et al. Carbon dots alleviate the toxicity of cadmium ions （Cd²⁺） toward wheat seedlings. Environmental Science-Nano， 2019， 6（5）： 1493-1506.
69	Chen Q， Liu B B， Man H， et al. Enhanced bioaccumulation efficiency and tolerance for Cd （II） in Arabidopsis thaliana by amphoteric nitrogen-doped carbon dots. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety， 2020， 190： e110108.
70	Li J L， Xiao L， Cheng Y C， et al. Applications of carbon quantum dots to alleviate Cd²⁺ phytotoxicity in Citrus maxima seedlings. Chemosphere， 2019， 236： e124385.
71	Fan X J， Xu J H， Lavoie M， et al. Multiwall carbon nanotubes modulate paraquat toxicity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environmental Pollution， 2018， 233： 633-641.
72	Zhang M L， Hu L L， Wang H B， et al. One-step hydrothermal synthesis of chiral carbon dots and their effects on mung bean plant growth. Nanoscale， 2018， 10（26）： 12734-12742.
73	Tripathi S， Kapri S， Datta A， et al. Influence of the morphology of carbon nanostructures on the stimulated growth of gram plant. RSC Advances， 2016， 6（50）： 43864-43873.
74	Mohammadi M H Z， Panahirad S， Navai A， et al. Cerium oxide nanoparticles （CeO₂-NPs） improve growth parameters and antioxidant defense system in moldavian balm （Dracocephalum moldavica L.） under salinity stress. Plant Stress， 2021， 1： e100006.
75	Sun L， Song F， Zhu X， et al. Nano-ZnO alleviates drought stress via modulating the plant water use and carbohydrate metabolism in maize. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science， 2021， 67（2）： 245-259.
76	Mohasseli V， Farbood F， Moradi A. Antioxidant defense and metabolic responses of lemon balm （Melissa officinalis L.） to Fe-nano-particles under reduced irrigation regimes. Industrial Crops and Products， 2020， 149： e112338.
77	Shafiq F， Iqbal M， Ali M， et al. Seed pre-treatment with polyhydroxy fullerene nanoparticles confer salt tolerance in wheat through upregulation of H₂O₂ neutralizing enzymes and phosphorus uptake. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition， 2019， 19（4）： 734-742.
78	Rizwan M， Ali S， Ali B， et al. Zinc and iron oxide nanoparticles improved the plant growth and reduced the oxidative stress and cadmium concentration in wheat. Chemosphere， 2019， 214： e269.
79	Dimkpa C O， Singh U， Bindraban P S， et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles alleviate drought-induced alterations in sorghum performance， nutrient acquisition， and grain fortification. Science of the Total Environment， 2019， 688： e926.
80	Abdel Latef A A H， Srivastava A K， El-Sadek M S A， et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles improve growth and enhance tolerance of broad bean plants under saline soil conditions. Land Degradation & Development， 2018， 29（4）： e1065.
81	Wu H H， Tito N， Giraldo J P. Anionic cerium oxide nanoparticles protect plant photosynthesis from abiotic stress by scavenging reactive oxygen species. ACS Nano， 2017， 11（11）： 11283-11297.
82	Wu H， Shabala L， Shabala S， et al. Hydroxyl radical scavenging by cerium oxide nanoparticles improves Arabidopsis salinity tolerance by enhancing leaf mesophyll potassium retention. Environmental Science-Nano， 2018， 5（7）： 1567-1583.
83	Lu L， Huang M， Huang Y X， et al. Mn₃O₄ nanozymes boost endogenous antioxidant metabolites in cucumber （Cucumis sativus） plant and enhance resistance to salinity stress. Environmental Science-Nano， 2020， 7（6）： 1692-1703.
84	Rizwan M， Ali S， Zia Ur Rehman M， et al. Alleviation of cadmium accumulation in maize （Zea mays L.） by foliar spray of zinc oxide nanoparticles and biochar to contaminated soil. Environmental Pollution， 2019， 248： e358.
85	Arora A， Sairam R K， Srivastava G C. Oxidative stress and antioxidative system in plants. Current Science， 2002， 82（10）： 1227-1238.
86	Hong F S， Yang F， Liu C， et al. Influences of nano-TiO₂ on the chloroplast aging of spinach under light. Biological Trace Element Research， 2005， 104（3）： 249-260.
87	Yao J， Cheng Y， Zhou M， et al. ROS scavenging Mn₃O₄ nanozymes for in vivo anti-inflammation. Chemical Science， 2018， 9（11）： 2927-2933.
88	Foley S， Crowley C， Smaihi M， et al. Cellular localisation of a water-soluble fullerene derivative. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications， 2002， 294（1）： 116-119.
89	Chen Q， Man H， Zhu L， et al. Enhanced plant antioxidant capacity and biodegradation of phenol by immobilizing peroxidase on amphoteric nitrogen-doped carbon dots. Catalysis Communications， 2020， 134： e105847.
90	Wang X P， Liu X Q， Chen J N， et al. Evaluation and mechanism of antifungal effects of carbon nanomaterials in controlling plant fungal pathogen. Carbon， 2014， 68： 798.
91	Narayanan K B， Park H H. Antifungal activity of silver nanoparticles synthesized using turnip leaf extract （Brassica rapa L.） against wood rotting pathogens. Europen Journal of Plant Pathology， 2014， 140（2）： e185.
92	Kanhed P， Birla S， Gaikwad S， et al. In vitro antifungal efficacy of copper nanoparticles against selected crop pathogenic fungi. Materials Letters， 2014， 115： e13.
93	Hajji-Hedfi L， Chhipa H. Nano-based pesticides： challenges for pest and disease management. Euro-Mediterranean Journal for Environmental Integration， 2021， 6（3）： 1-8.
94	Liu Y L， Yue L， Wang Z Y， et al. Processes and mechanisms of photosynthesis augmented by engineered nanomaterials. Environmental Chemistry， 2019， 16（6）： 430.
95	Sharkey T D. Discovery of the canonical Calvin-Benson cycle. Photosynthesis Research， 2019， 140（2）： 235-252.
96	Servin A D， Morales M I， Castillo-Michel H， et al. Synchrotron verification of TiO₂ accumulation in cucumber fruit： A possible pathway of TiO₂ nanoparticle transfer from soil into the food chain. Environmental Science & Technology， 2013， 47（20）： 11592-11598.
97	Abbasifar A， Shahrabadi F， Valizadehkaji B. Effects of green synthesized zinc and copper nano-fertilizers on the morphological and biochemical attributes of basil plant. Journal of Plant Nutrition， 2020， 43（8）： 1104-1118.
98	Li Y D， Xu X K， Lei B F， et al. Magnesium-nitrogen co-doped carbon dots enhance plant growth through multifunctional regulation in photosynthesis. Chemical Engineering Journal， 2021， 422： e130114.
99	Li W， Wu S S， Zhang H R， et al. Enhanced biological photosynthetic efficiency using light-harvesting engineering with dual-emissive carbon dots. Advanced Functional Materials， 2018， 28（44）： e1804004.
100	Sai L M， Liu S Q， Qian X X， et al. Nontoxic fluorescent carbon nanodot serving as a light conversion material in plant for UV light utilization. Colloids and Surfaces B-Biointerfaces， 2018， 169： 422-428.
101	Ze Y G， Liu C， Wang L，et al. The regulation of TiO₂ nanoparticles on the expression of light-harvesting complex II and photosynthesis of chloroplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana. Biological Trace Element Research， 2011， 143（2）： e1131.
102	Kang S， Yasuda M， Miyasaka H， et al. Light harvesting and energy transfer in multiporphyrin-modified CdSe nanoparticles. Chemsuschem， 2008， 1（3）： 254-261.
103	Hong F， Zhou J， Liu C， et al. Effect of nano-TiO₂ on photochemical reaction of chloroplasts of spinach. Biological Trace Element Research， 2005， 105（1/2/3）： 269-279.
104	Wang A D， Jin Q J， Xu X， et al. High-throughput screening for engineered nanoparticles that enhance photosynthesis using mesophyll protoplasts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry， 2020， 68（11）： 3382-3389.
105	Giraldo J， Landry M， Faltermeier S， et al. Plant nanobionics approach to augment photosynthesis and biochemical sensing. Nature Materials， 2014， 13（4）： 400-408.
106	Kim J H， Oh Y， Yoon H， et al. Iron nanoparticle-induced activation of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase promotes stomatal opening in Arabidopsis thaliana. Environmental Science & Technology， 2015， 49（2）： 1113-1119.
107	Wachter R M， Henderson J N. Photosynthesis： Rubisco rescue. Nature Plants， 2015， 1（1）： e14010.
108	Singh D， Kumar A. Investigating long-term effect of nanoparticles on growth of Raphanus sativus plants： a trans-generational study. Ecotoxicology， 2018， 27（1）： 23-31.

[1]	Yan-liang SUN, Jun-wei ZHAO, Xuan-shuai LIU, Sheng-yi LI, Chun-hui MA, Xu-zhe WANG, Qian-bing ZHANG. Effect of nitrogen application on photosynthetic daily variation， leaf morphology and dry matter yield of alfalfa at the early flowering growth stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(9): 63-75.
[2]	Yan-liang SUN, Kong-qin WEI, Xuan-shuai LIU, Jun-wei ZHAO, Sheng-yi LI, Chun-hui MA, Qian-bing ZHANG. Diurnal changes in photosynthesis and photosynthetic product partitioning in alfalfa in response to phosphorus application [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(12): 85-94.
[3]	Lin CHEN, Gao-lu CHEN, Nai-ping SONG, Xue-bin LI, Hong-yun WAN, Wen-qiang HE. Response of photosynthetic characteristics and water use efficiency of Artemisia scoparia to rainfall changes in Eastern Ningxia desert steppe [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(10): 87-98.
[4]	Yong-chao ZHANG, Guo-ling LIANG, Yan QIN, Wen-hui LIU, Zhi-feng JIA, Yong LIU, Xiang MA. Characteristics of chlorophyll and photosynthesis in leaves and their response to nutrients during aging of Elymus sibiricus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(1): 229-237.
[5]	Li-qing ZHAO, Xiang-yong PENG, Jun-xiang LIU, Jin-mei MAO, Zhen-yuan SUN. Effects of reduced glutathione on the growth and photosynthesis of perennial ryegrass under lead stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(9): 97-104.
[6]	Hui WANG, Hao-qi TIAN, Pei-sheng MAO, Wen-hui LIU, Zhi-feng JIA, Lu-ping WEI, Qing-ping ZHOU. Progress in research on the photosynthetic characteristics of green non-leaf organs in plants [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(10): 191-200.
[7]	WANG Yong-chao, ZHANG Ying-lei, YAN Dong-liang, HE Ling-zhi, LI Zhuo, YAN Bo-wen, SHAO Rui-xin, GUO Jia-meng, YANG Qing-hua. Physiological role of γ-aminobutyric acid in protecting the photosynthetic system of maize seedlings under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 191-203.
[8]	HUANG Xi-ye, HE Lin-jiang, LIU Jin-ping, YOU Ming-hong, LIU Hang-jiang. Gender differences in water relations, photosynthetic characteristics and cold resistance metabolites in Humulus scandens in response to winter cooling [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(2): 103-113.
[9]	LI Wen-bin, NING Chu-han, LI Wei, LI Feng, GUO Shao-xia. Responses of AMF and PGPR to Festuca elata under phenanthrene and pyrene stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(8): 84-94.
[10]	WANG Ri-ming, WANG Zhi-qiang, XIANG Zuo-xiang. Effect of γ-aminobutyric acid on photosynthetic characteristics and carbohydrate metabolism under high temperature stress in perennial ryegrass [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(2): 168-178.
[11]	LI Zhou, PENG Yan, YIN Shu-xia, HAN Lie-bao. Effects of exogenous mannose application on drought tolerance, sugars, and sugar alcohol accumulation in white clover [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(12): 85-93.
[12]	ZHAO Ying, YI Qin, WEI Xiao-hong, XIN Xia-qing, HAN Ting, YUE Kai, WANG Fang-lin. Role of NO-mediated Ca²⁺ signaling in regulation of photosynthesis and resistance to osmotic stress in alfalfa seedlings [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(5): 130-140.
[13]	GUO Hai-Yan, DUAN Jing, LIU Jin-Ping, YOU Ming-Hong, XIE Rui-Juan. Effects of temperature on flower bud differentiation, pigment contents, and photosynthesis of male and female Humulus scandens [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(8): 104-112.
[14]	ZHANG Li-Xia, CHANG Qing-Shan, HOU Xiao-Gai, LIU Wei, LI Xiao-Peng, GAO Yu-Hang, ZHANG Xiu-Li, DING Sheng-Yun, XIAO Rui-Xue, ZHANG Yao, DENG Yong-Heng. Effects of NaCl stress on antioxidant capacity and photosynthetic characteristics of Prunella vulgaris seedlings [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(11): 167-175.
[15]	FAN Qin, LI Yan-Zhong. The effect of Phoma medicaginis on the photosynthetic physiology of Medicago sativa [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(1): 112-121.