Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 196-203.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2023218
Chen MENG1,2,3(), Xue-li LU1,2,3, Yi-ru SONG4, Cheng-sheng ZHANG1,2,3, Yi-qiang LI1,2,3, Hai-qin XIANG5, Zong-chang XU1,2,3()
Received:
2023-06-27
Revised:
2023-07-28
Online:
2024-05-20
Published:
2024-02-03
Contact:
Zong-chang XU
Chen MENG, Xue-li LU, Yi-ru SONG, Cheng-sheng ZHANG, Yi-qiang LI, Hai-qin XIANG, Zong-chang XU. Evaluation and identification of salt tolerance of 11 Leonurus germplasm lines at the seedling stage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(5): 196-203.
编号Number | 产地Place of origin |
---|---|
HY154 | 山东省青岛市即墨区Jimo district, Qingdao city, Shandong Province |
HY162 | 山东省潍坊市下营镇Xiaying town, Weifang city, Shandong Province |
HY186 | 山东省青岛市王演庄村Wangyanzhuang village, Qingdao city, Shandong Province |
HY193 | 江苏省宿迁市泗阳县Siyang county, Suqian city, Jiangsu Province |
HY197 | 山东省青岛市城阳区Chengyang district, Qingdao city, Shandong Province |
HY198 | 广东省广州市白云区Baiyun district, Guangzhou city, Guangdong Province |
HY199 | 山东省潍坊市寿光市Shouguang city, Weifang city, Shandong Province |
HY202 | 江苏省宿迁市沐阳县Muyang county, Suqian city, Jiangsu Province |
HY203 | 广东省揭阳市榕城区Rongcheng district, Jieyang city, Guangdong Province |
HY206 | 河北省石家庄市辛集市Xinji city, Shijiazhuang city, Hebei Province |
HY207 | 江苏省淮安市清江浦区Qingjiangpu district, Huaian city, Jiangsu Province |
Table 1 Material number and origins
编号Number | 产地Place of origin |
---|---|
HY154 | 山东省青岛市即墨区Jimo district, Qingdao city, Shandong Province |
HY162 | 山东省潍坊市下营镇Xiaying town, Weifang city, Shandong Province |
HY186 | 山东省青岛市王演庄村Wangyanzhuang village, Qingdao city, Shandong Province |
HY193 | 江苏省宿迁市泗阳县Siyang county, Suqian city, Jiangsu Province |
HY197 | 山东省青岛市城阳区Chengyang district, Qingdao city, Shandong Province |
HY198 | 广东省广州市白云区Baiyun district, Guangzhou city, Guangdong Province |
HY199 | 山东省潍坊市寿光市Shouguang city, Weifang city, Shandong Province |
HY202 | 江苏省宿迁市沐阳县Muyang county, Suqian city, Jiangsu Province |
HY203 | 广东省揭阳市榕城区Rongcheng district, Jieyang city, Guangdong Province |
HY206 | 河北省石家庄市辛集市Xinji city, Shijiazhuang city, Hebei Province |
HY207 | 江苏省淮安市清江浦区Qingjiangpu district, Huaian city, Jiangsu Province |
Salt tolerance class | |||
---|---|---|---|
Table 2 Symptoms of L. heterophyllus at seedling stage under salt stress
Salt tolerance class | |||
---|---|---|---|
Salt tolerance class | |||
---|---|---|---|
Table 3 Salt injury index and grade of L. heterophyllus
Salt tolerance class | |||
---|---|---|---|
指标 Index | 最大值 Maximum value | 最小值 Minimum value | 极差 Range | 平均值 Mean value | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Variable coefficient (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH (cm) | 7.90 | 3.77 | 4.13 | 5.63 | 1.60 | 28.47 |
RL (cm) | 11.09 | 7.20 | 3.89 | 8.78 | 1.19 | 13.58 |
LA (mm2) | 77.42 | 16.38 | 61.03 | 48.94 | 22.02 | 45.00 |
MSD (mm) | 1.28 | 0.46 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.27 | 31.55 |
MRD (mm) | 0.87 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.65 | 0.13 | 20.33 |
AFW (mg) | 106.91 | 12.61 | 94.30 | 52.40 | 31.38 | 59.89 |
RFW (mg) | 47.37 | 11.39 | 35.98 | 25.30 | 0.01 | 46.55 |
ADW (mg) | 10.74 | 2.19 | 8.55 | 6.37 | 3.17 | 49.73 |
RDW (mg) | 4.52 | 1.37 | 3.15 | 2.41 | 0.97 | 40.06 |
CCA (mg·L-1) | 4.99 | 1.66 | 3.33 | 2.81 | 1.00 | 35.55 |
CCB (mg·L-1) | 4.01 | 2.21 | 1.80 | 2.98 | 0.74 | 24.92 |
MDA (μmol·g-1 FW) | 16.01 | 8.01 | 8.00 | 12.58 | 3.13 | 24.84 |
Table 4 Variation analysis of characters in L. heterophyllus under salt stress
指标 Index | 最大值 Maximum value | 最小值 Minimum value | 极差 Range | 平均值 Mean value | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Variable coefficient (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH (cm) | 7.90 | 3.77 | 4.13 | 5.63 | 1.60 | 28.47 |
RL (cm) | 11.09 | 7.20 | 3.89 | 8.78 | 1.19 | 13.58 |
LA (mm2) | 77.42 | 16.38 | 61.03 | 48.94 | 22.02 | 45.00 |
MSD (mm) | 1.28 | 0.46 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.27 | 31.55 |
MRD (mm) | 0.87 | 0.49 | 0.37 | 0.65 | 0.13 | 20.33 |
AFW (mg) | 106.91 | 12.61 | 94.30 | 52.40 | 31.38 | 59.89 |
RFW (mg) | 47.37 | 11.39 | 35.98 | 25.30 | 0.01 | 46.55 |
ADW (mg) | 10.74 | 2.19 | 8.55 | 6.37 | 3.17 | 49.73 |
RDW (mg) | 4.52 | 1.37 | 3.15 | 2.41 | 0.97 | 40.06 |
CCA (mg·L-1) | 4.99 | 1.66 | 3.33 | 2.81 | 1.00 | 35.55 |
CCB (mg·L-1) | 4.01 | 2.21 | 1.80 | 2.98 | 0.74 | 24.92 |
MDA (μmol·g-1 FW) | 16.01 | 8.01 | 8.00 | 12.58 | 3.13 | 24.84 |
指标 Index | PH | RL | LA | MSD | MRD | AFW | RFW | ADW | RDW | CCA | CCB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RL | |||||||||||
LA | |||||||||||
MSD | |||||||||||
MRD | |||||||||||
AFW | |||||||||||
RFW | |||||||||||
ADW | |||||||||||
RDW | |||||||||||
CCA | |||||||||||
CCB | |||||||||||
MDA |
Table 5 Correlation analysis of each index in L. heterophyllus under salt stress
指标 Index | PH | RL | LA | MSD | MRD | AFW | RFW | ADW | RDW | CCA | CCB |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RL | |||||||||||
LA | |||||||||||
MSD | |||||||||||
MRD | |||||||||||
AFW | |||||||||||
RFW | |||||||||||
ADW | |||||||||||
RDW | |||||||||||
CCA | |||||||||||
CCB | |||||||||||
MDA |
指标 Index | 主成分因子Principal component factor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |
PH | 0.154 | -0.086 | -0.213 | 0.008 |
RL | -0.163 | 0.053 | 0.179 | 0.451 |
LA | 0.070 | 0.237 | -0.235 | -0.418 |
MSD | 0.135 | -0.082 | -0.229 | 0.308 |
MRD | 0.189 | 0.106 | 0.205 | -0.224 |
AFW | 0.158 | 0.042 | -0.378 | 0.363 |
RFW | -0.029 | 0.298 | -0.066 | 0.343 |
ADW | -0.107 | -0.259 | -0.004 | 0.089 |
RDW | -0.068 | 0.306 | 0.064 | 0.149 |
CCA | 0.190 | 0.013 | 0.356 | 0.136 |
CCB | 0.170 | -0.015 | 0.422 | 0.131 |
MDA | -0.118 | 0.069 | 0.060 | -0.225 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 4.348 | 2.937 | 1.457 | 1.125 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 36.232 | 24.478 | 12.142 | 9.379 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 36.232 | 60.710 | 72.852 | 82.230 |
Table 6 Eigenvalues and cumulative contribution of principal component
指标 Index | 主成分因子Principal component factor | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | |
PH | 0.154 | -0.086 | -0.213 | 0.008 |
RL | -0.163 | 0.053 | 0.179 | 0.451 |
LA | 0.070 | 0.237 | -0.235 | -0.418 |
MSD | 0.135 | -0.082 | -0.229 | 0.308 |
MRD | 0.189 | 0.106 | 0.205 | -0.224 |
AFW | 0.158 | 0.042 | -0.378 | 0.363 |
RFW | -0.029 | 0.298 | -0.066 | 0.343 |
ADW | -0.107 | -0.259 | -0.004 | 0.089 |
RDW | -0.068 | 0.306 | 0.064 | 0.149 |
CCA | 0.190 | 0.013 | 0.356 | 0.136 |
CCB | 0.170 | -0.015 | 0.422 | 0.131 |
MDA | -0.118 | 0.069 | 0.060 | -0.225 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 4.348 | 2.937 | 1.457 | 1.125 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 36.232 | 24.478 | 12.142 | 9.379 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 36.232 | 60.710 | 72.852 | 82.230 |
品种 Germplasm | 主成分因子Principal component factor | 隶属函数Membership function | D值 D-value | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | ||
HY198 | 1.449 | -1.103 | 1.305 | 0.617 | 0.862 | 0.361 | 1.000 | 0.761 | 0.722 |
HY199 | 1.914 | -0.137 | 0.169 | -0.329 | 1.000 | 0.655 | 0.665 | 0.500 | 0.791 |
HY202 | 0.506 | 0.049 | -2.091 | -0.281 | 0.584 | 0.712 | 0.000 | 0.513 | 0.528 |
HY203 | 0.229 | 0.995 | 0.253 | 1.484 | 0.502 | 1.000 | 0.690 | 1.000 | 0.735 |
HY206 | -1.468 | -2.288 | 0.040 | 0.310 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.627 | 0.676 | 0.170 |
HY207 | 0.013 | -0.455 | -1.183 | 0.376 | 0.438 | 0.558 | 0.268 | 0.694 | 0.478 |
HY154 | -0.375 | 0.892 | 0.840 | -1.050 | 0.323 | 0.969 | 0.863 | 0.301 | 0.593 |
HY162 | -0.692 | 0.920 | -0.083 | 0.589 | 0.229 | 0.977 | 0.591 | 0.753 | 0.565 |
HY186 | -0.634 | 0.761 | -0.290 | 0.875 | 0.247 | 0.929 | 0.531 | 0.832 | 0.558 |
HY193 | -0.079 | 0.032 | -0.220 | -2.139 | 0.411 | 0.707 | 0.551 | 0.000 | 0.473 |
HY197 | -0.862 | 0.334 | 1.259 | -0.451 | 0.179 | 0.799 | 0.986 | 0.466 | 0.515 |
Table 7 Principal component values, membership function and D-value of each germplasm
品种 Germplasm | 主成分因子Principal component factor | 隶属函数Membership function | D值 D-value | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | ||
HY198 | 1.449 | -1.103 | 1.305 | 0.617 | 0.862 | 0.361 | 1.000 | 0.761 | 0.722 |
HY199 | 1.914 | -0.137 | 0.169 | -0.329 | 1.000 | 0.655 | 0.665 | 0.500 | 0.791 |
HY202 | 0.506 | 0.049 | -2.091 | -0.281 | 0.584 | 0.712 | 0.000 | 0.513 | 0.528 |
HY203 | 0.229 | 0.995 | 0.253 | 1.484 | 0.502 | 1.000 | 0.690 | 1.000 | 0.735 |
HY206 | -1.468 | -2.288 | 0.040 | 0.310 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.627 | 0.676 | 0.170 |
HY207 | 0.013 | -0.455 | -1.183 | 0.376 | 0.438 | 0.558 | 0.268 | 0.694 | 0.478 |
HY154 | -0.375 | 0.892 | 0.840 | -1.050 | 0.323 | 0.969 | 0.863 | 0.301 | 0.593 |
HY162 | -0.692 | 0.920 | -0.083 | 0.589 | 0.229 | 0.977 | 0.591 | 0.753 | 0.565 |
HY186 | -0.634 | 0.761 | -0.290 | 0.875 | 0.247 | 0.929 | 0.531 | 0.832 | 0.558 |
HY193 | -0.079 | 0.032 | -0.220 | -2.139 | 0.411 | 0.707 | 0.551 | 0.000 | 0.473 |
HY197 | -0.862 | 0.334 | 1.259 | -0.451 | 0.179 | 0.799 | 0.986 | 0.466 | 0.515 |
1 | Zhang J, Guo W B, Yan L, et al. Identification and evaluation of salt-alkali tolerance and screening of salt-alkali tolerant germplasm of oat (Avena sativa L.). Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(6): 1551-1561. |
张静, 郭文博, 晏林, 等. 燕麦种质资源耐盐碱性鉴定评价及耐盐碱种质筛选. 作物学报, 2023, 49(6): 1551-1561. | |
2 | Hu L L, Wang S H, Wang L X, et al. Identification of salt tolerance and screening of salt tolerant germplasm of mungbean (Viga radiate L.) at seedling stage. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(2): 367-379. |
胡亮亮, 王素华, 王丽侠, 等. 绿豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定及耐盐种质筛选. 作物学报, 2022, 48(2): 367-379. | |
3 | Sun J, Xu X Y, Ma Z K, et al. Identification of salt-tolerant germplasm and analysis of its physiological response during barely germination. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2019, 37(6): 16-23. |
孙建, 徐晓芸, 马增科, 等. 大麦发芽期耐盐性种质鉴定及其生理响应特征分析. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(6): 16-23. | |
4 | Tian S H, Tao C X, Zhang F. Evaluation on salt tolerance of twenty medicinal plants at seedling stage. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 49(8): 49-54. |
田淑慧, 陶翠霞, 张锋. 20种药用植物的苗期耐盐性及其评价. 山东农业科学, 2017, 49(8): 49-54. | |
5 | Cui X G, Lu Z G. Effect of different sodium salt stress on seed germination of Leonurus artemisia. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 50(22): 4657-4659, 4663. |
崔兴国, 芦站根. 不同钠盐胁迫对益母草种子发芽的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2011, 50(22): 4657-4659, 4663. | |
6 | Han D F, Zhou Y H, Zhang L H, et al. Effects of Na2CO3 and NaHCO3 mixed stress on seed germination of Leonurus japonicas. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(3): 222-223. |
韩德复, 周艳辉, 张丽辉, 等. Na2CO3和NaHCO3混合胁迫对益母草种子萌发的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2012, 40(3): 222-223. | |
7 | Tan Y J. Study on the resource chemistry and quality evaluation of Leonurus japonicas Houtt. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 2019. |
谭亚杰. 益母草资源化学与质量标准研究. 南京: 南京中医药大学, 2019. | |
8 | Qiao J J. Study on quality evaluation of Leonuri herba. Nanjing: Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, 2022. |
乔晶晶. 益母草药材质量评价研究. 南京: 南京中医药大学, 2022. | |
9 | Tao W X, Cheng S H, Ji J C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salinity tolerance of rice variety resources and screening of salinity tolerance indexes. Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 2022, 50(18): 180-187. |
陶维旭, 程生海, 冀俊超, 等. 水稻品种资源耐盐性综合评价及耐盐指标筛选. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(18): 180-187. | |
10 | Sun X J, Jiang Q Y, Hu Z, et al. Identification and evaluation of wheat germplasm resources at seedling stage. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(4): 1132-1139. |
孙现军, 姜奇彦, 胡正, 等. 小麦种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定评价. 作物学报, 2023, 49(4): 1132-1139. | |
11 | Li J P, Wang X P, Liu S J, et al. Salt tolerance of maize at seedling stage: Identification and evaluation method. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2022, 38(18): 28-34. |
李俊萍, 王秀萍, 刘素娟, 等. 玉米苗期耐盐性鉴定评价方法研究. 中国农学通报, 2022, 38(18): 28-34. | |
12 | Zhou X W, Zhang X R, Sun H X, et al. Evaluation of salt tolerance of soybean germplasms at germination and seedling stages. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2022, 53(3): 257-264. |
周秀文, 张晓蕊, 孙贺祥, 等. 大豆种质萌发期和苗期耐盐性评价. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2022, 53(3): 257-264. | |
13 | Li B, Lv Y, Yang M X, et al. Effects of saline-alkali stress on physiology and molecular mechanism of Brassica napus L. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2022, 37(3): 86-93. |
李班, 吕莹, 杨明煊, 等. 盐碱胁迫对甘蓝型油菜生理及分子机制的影响. 华北农学报, 2022, 37(3): 86-93. | |
14 | Zelm E V, Zhang Y X, Testerink C. Salt tolerance mechanisms of plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2020, 71: 403-433. |
15 | Zhang Y W, Zhang L F, Li W, et al. Evaluation on salt tolerance of soybean at germination and seedling stages using membership function. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 48(1): 21-25. |
张彦威, 张礼凤, 李伟, 等. 大豆发芽期和苗期耐盐性的隶属函数分析. 山东农业科学, 2016, 48(1): 21-25. | |
16 | Chen Y Q, Su K Q, Chen T X, et al. Effects of complex saline-alkali stress on seed germination and seedling physiological characteristics of Achnatherum inebrians. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 137-157. |
陈雅琦, 苏楷淇, 陈泰祥, 等. 混合盐碱胁迫对醉马草种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3): 137-157. | |
17 | He X Q. Multivariate statistical analysis. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2015: 152-174. |
何晓群. 多元统计分析. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2015: 152-174. | |
18 | Sun D L, Bian N F, Chen Z D, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance and screening for salt tolerant accessions of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) at germination stage. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017, 18(6): 1079-1087. |
孙东雷, 卞能飞, 陈志德, 等. 花生萌发期耐盐性综合评价及耐盐种质筛选. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(6): 1079-1087. | |
19 | Yu F R, Li Y D, Cheng Y Q, et al. Identification and evaluation of salt tolerance of Tigernut germplasm resources at seedling stage. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2023, 41(2): 1-10, 85. |
于馥榕, 李毅丹, 程云清, 等. 油莎豆种质资源苗期耐盐性鉴定与评价. 干旱地区农业研究, 2023, 41(2): 1-10, 85. | |
20 | Li J W, Liu J H, Zhao B P, et al. Evaluation of salt tolerance of oat materials at seedling stage and selection of the relative index. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University, 2022, DOI: 10.13327/j.jjlau.2021.1623. |
李俊伟, 刘景辉, 赵宝平, 等. 燕麦苗期耐盐性评价及鉴定指标筛选. 吉林农业大学学报, 2022, DOI: 10.13327/j.jjlau.2021.1623. | |
21 | Zhang X C, Xue X X, Jiang S, et al. Identification of mixed saline-alkali tolerance and screening of indicators in soybean at germination stage. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-occidentalis Sinica, 2020, 29(3): 374-381. |
张新草, 薛项潇, 姜深, 等. 大豆种质发芽期耐盐碱性鉴定及指标筛选. 西北农业学报, 2020, 29(3): 374-381. | |
22 | Yu R G, Zhang D, Yu X Y, et al. Comparison analysis of salinity tolerance and screening of salinity tolerance indicators in 13 Brassica rapa L. ssp. chinensis varieties at seedling stage. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2022, 37(1): 24-31. |
余如刚, 张迪, 余心悦, 等. 13种小白菜苗期耐盐比较分析及耐性指标筛选. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2022, 37(1): 24-31. |
[1] | Jia-min ZHANG, Hao GUAN, Hai-ping LI, Zhi-feng JIA, Xiang MA, Wen-hui LIU, You-jun CHEN, Shi-yong CHEN, Yong-mei JIANG, Li GAN, Qing-ping ZHOU, Li-xue YANG. Effects of oat∶feed pea sowing ratio and lactic acid bacteria addition on crop silage fermentation and ruminal degradation characteristics of the resulting total mixed ration [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 169-181. |
[2] | Yu-ying CAO, Xue-meng SU, Zheng-chao ZHOU, Qun-wei ZHENG, Jia-hui YUE. Spatial differences in, and factors influencing, the shear strength of typical herb root-soil complexes in the Loess Plateau of China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 94-105. |
[3] | Li-li ZHU, Ye-meng ZHANG, Wan-cai LI, Ya-li ZHAO, Xiang LI, Zhi-guo CHEN. Adaption to the Plateau climate in Qinghai of 39 silage maize varieties cultivated in different ecological regions of China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(4): 68-78. |
[4] | Chun-yan LI, Yan WANG, Xin-rui LI, Ying-zhu LI, Ming-feng LI, Li-li CHEN, Xiong LEI, Li-jun YAN, Ming-hong YOU, Xiao-fei JI, Chang-bing ZHANG, Qi WU, Wen-long GOU, Da-xu LI, Jia-jun YAN, Shi-qie BAI. Morphological diversity and germplasm utilization potential of wild Elymus sibiricus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 67-79. |
[5] | Zong-chang XU, Xue-li LU, Yun-chong WEI, Chen MENG, Meng-chao ZHANG, Yuan-yang ZHANG, Meng WANG, Ju-ying WANG, Cheng-sheng ZHANG, Yi-qiang LI. Salt tolerance identification and evaluation of a population of wild soybean SP1 mutants at the seedling stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(11): 168-178. |
[6] | Shan-shan WANG, Hai-tao GU, Hui-fang XIE, Shao-dong HE, Chang-bo GAN, Xiao-yong WEI, Guang-chao KONG. Evaluation of forage yield and quality traits of 113 forage hexaploid triticale germplasm lines [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(1): 192-202. |
[7] | Rui-qiang LI, Yu-xiang WANG, Yu-lan SUN, Lei ZHANG, Ai-ping CHEN. Effects of salt stress on the growth, physiology, and biochemistry of five Bromus inermis varieties [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(1): 99-111. |
[8] | Zi-ying CHEN, Dan-na CHANG, Mei HAN, Zheng-peng LI, Qing-biao YAN, Jiu-dong ZHANG, Guo-peng ZHOU, Xiao-feng SUN, Wei-dong CAO. Capability evaluation of 47 common vetch cultivars (lines) as autumn green manure in Qinghai Province, Northwest China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(2): 39-51. |
[9] | Ting-mei WU, Hui-long LIN, Di FAN, Chang-ting JI, Yu-ting ZHAO, Jing-qiong WEI. Factors influencing the scale of herdsmen’s livestock farming in tundra alpine grassland-A case study from Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(9): 117-126. |
[10] | Ji-xiang WANG, Huan-yu GONG, Xiang-jian TU, Zhen-xing GUO, Jia-nan ZHAO, Jian SHEN, Zhen-yi LI, Juan SUN. Screening of phosphite-tolerant alfalfa varieties and identification of phosphite tolerance indicators [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 186-199. |
[11] | Dou-dou LIN, Gui-qin ZHAO, Ze-liang JU, Wen-long GONG. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of 15 oat varieties at the seedling stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(11): 108-121. |
[12] | WANG Miao-miao, ZHOU Xiang-rui, LIANG Guo-ling, ZHAO Gui-qin, JIAO Run-an, CHAI Ji-kuan, GAO Xue-mei, LI Juan-ning. A multi-trait evaluation of salt tolerance of 5 oat germplasm lines at the seedling stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 143-154. |
[13] | LEI Xiong, YOU Ming-hong, BAI Shi-qie, CHEN Li-li, DENG Pei-hua, XIONG Yi, XIONG Yan-li, YU Qing-qing, MA Xiao, YANG Jian, ZHANG Chang-bing. Genetic diversity analysis and multivariate evaluation of agronomic traits of 50 oat germplasm lines in northwest Sichuan [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 131-142. |
[14] | LIU Jiang, LV Tao, ZHANG Li-xin, YE Li-na, LIU Xiang-yang, DAI Xiang-rong, WANG Wei-wei, DING Ru. Soil quality assessment by principal component analysis in Glycyrrhiza uralensis stands of differing ages [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(6): 162-171. |
[15] | LIU Shu-jun, YAO Xin-zhuan, ZHAO De-gang, LÜ Li-tang. An evaluation of soil nutrient status and balance in Meitan tea plantations [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(11): 33-45. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||