Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 192-202.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2022011
Shan-shan WANG(), Hai-tao GU, Hui-fang XIE, Shao-dong HE, Chang-bo GAN, Xiao-yong WEI, Guang-chao KONG()
Received:
2022-01-06
Revised:
2022-04-18
Online:
2023-01-20
Published:
2022-11-07
Contact:
Guang-chao KONG
Shan-shan WANG, Hai-tao GU, Hui-fang XIE, Shao-dong HE, Chang-bo GAN, Xiao-yong WEI, Guang-chao KONG. Evaluation of forage yield and quality traits of 113 forage hexaploid triticale germplasm lines[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(1): 192-202.
编号No. | 品种Variety | 来源Source | 编号No. | 品种Variety | 来源Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B-4081 | 阿根廷Argentina | 58 | CXST-56/212 | 瑞典Sweden |
2 | Presto | 保加利亚Bulgaria | 59 | Triticale C | 瑞典Sweden |
3 | Pshero 16 | 保加利亚Bulgaria | 60 | Triticale H | 瑞典Sweden |
4 | LT 259/72 | 波兰Poland | 61 | Triticale L | 瑞典Sweden |
5 | LT 344/72 | 波兰Poland | 62 | Triticale N | 瑞典Sweden |
6 | Kiskum | 波兰Poland | 63 | Triticale P | 瑞典Sweden |
7 | Lasko | 波兰Poland | 64 | Triticale R | 瑞典Sweden |
8 | Ugo | 波兰Poland | 65 | Hybrid 46-131 | 瑞士Switzerland |
9 | Riebesel 47/51 | 德国Germany | 66 | Odesskij Kormovoj | 乌克兰Ukraine |
10 | Riebesel 47/52 | 德国Germany | 67 | ADL 2 | 乌克兰Ukraine |
11 | Salzmunder Bartweizen | 德国Germany | 68 | AD 19 | 乌克兰Ukraine |
12 | Riebesel 48 | 德国Germany | 69 | Zitnica 1 | 乌克兰Ukraine |
13 | 8A221 | 德国Germany | 70 | Dneprovskij | 乌克兰Ukraine |
14 | 71/2956 | 俄罗斯Russia | 71 | NAD-762-7 | 乌克兰Ukraine |
15 | 223/845 | 俄罗斯Russia | 72 | Triticale 9 | 西班牙Spain |
16 | 38 | 俄罗斯Russia | 73 | 6TA386 | 匈牙利Hungary |
17 | 539/1549 | 俄罗斯Russia | 74 | 20 | 匈牙利Hungary |
18 | Wheatgrass Hybrid 599 | 俄罗斯Russia | 75 | WH10-4 | 中国China |
19 | AD 114 | 俄罗斯Russia | 76 | WH11-4 | 中国China |
20 | NAD 236 | 俄罗斯Russia | 77 | WH13-4 | 中国China |
21 | 1 AD 545 | 俄罗斯Russia | 78 | 中饲1048 Zhongsi 1048 | 中国China |
22 | 2 AD 325 | 俄罗斯Russia | 79 | WH08-2 | 中国China |
23 | Spontanyi Kanova 1185 | 俄罗斯Russia | 80 | WH12-1 | 中国China |
24 | Oktoploid Derzhavina | 俄罗斯Russia | 81 | WH12-2 | 中国China |
25 | STNIISM-1 | 俄罗斯Russia | 82 | WH12-4 | 中国China |
26 | 71-1795 | 俄罗斯Russia | 83 | WH14-2 | 中国China |
27 | PRAO 6/1 | 俄罗斯Russia | 84 | NTH1933 | 中国China |
28 | Kazanskij 4 | 俄罗斯Russia | 85 | 石大1号小黑麦 Shida No.1 triticale | 中国China |
29 | Oktoploid Derzavina | 俄罗斯Russia | 86 | WH17-1 | 中国China |
30 | PRAO-5/2 | 俄罗斯Russia | 87 | WH17-2 | 中国China |
31 | Stavropol'skij Ⅰ | 俄罗斯Russia | 88 | WH17-3 | 中国China |
32 | PRAG-119 | 俄罗斯Russia | 89 | WH17-4 | 中国China |
33 | 8A-91 | 加拿大Canada | 90 | WH17-5 | 中国China |
34 | TF 2 | 罗马尼亚Romania | 91 | 中饲237 Zhongsi 237 | 中国China |
35 | 6TA203 | 美国America | 92 | 冀饲3号 Jisi No.3 | 中国China |
36 | Morrison | 美国America | 93 | 中饲1257 Zhongsi 1257 | 中国China |
37 | M85-7050 | 美国America | 94 | 中饲1877 Zhongsi 1877 | 中国China |
38 | Eve | 美国America | 95 | NTH1888 | 中国China |
39 | Mammoth | 美国America | 96 | 中饲1640 Zhongsi 1640 | 中国China |
40 | KT941276pb003 | 美国America | 97 | 甘农2号 Gannong No.2 | 中国China |
41 | 6TA131 | 美国America | 98 | 冀饲2号 Jisi No.2 | 中国China |
42 | AM 2147 | 美国America | 99 | NTH2736 | 中国China |
43 | OK 78828 | 美国America | 100 | WOH939 | 中国China |
44 | 8A-148 | 美国America | 101 | 牧乐3000 Mule 3000 | 中国China |
45 | Newcale | 美国America | 102 | 中饲3297 Zhongsi 3297 | 中国China |
46 | Breaker | 美国America | 103 | 中饲2712 Zhongsi 2712 | 中国China |
47 | Gaucho | 美国America | 104 | 甘农C6 Gannong C6 | 中国China |
48 | Triti-Gold 22 | 美国America | 105 | 甘农C10 Gannong C10 | 中国China |
49 | UCRTCL2-2001 | 美国America | 106 | 甘农C23 Gannong C23 | 中国China |
50 | UCRTCL3-2002 | 美国America | 107 | 4鉴34 4 jian 34 | 中国China |
51 | KT941256h003 | 美国America | 108 | 5鉴54 5 jian 54 | 中国China |
52 | KT941256h3066 | 美国America | 109 | 5鉴2 5 jian 2 | 中国China |
53 | Salmon | 日本Japan | 110 | AMYP | 中国China |
54 | 18 | 日本Japan | 111 | ADMII | 中国China |
55 | 87 | 日本Japan | 112 | 5鉴64 5 jian 64 | 中国China |
56 | Triticale A | 瑞典Sweden | 113 | 5鉴50 5 jian 50 | 中国China |
57 | Amphydiploid O | 瑞典Sweden |
Table 1 The name and source of the tested forage triticale germplasm
编号No. | 品种Variety | 来源Source | 编号No. | 品种Variety | 来源Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | B-4081 | 阿根廷Argentina | 58 | CXST-56/212 | 瑞典Sweden |
2 | Presto | 保加利亚Bulgaria | 59 | Triticale C | 瑞典Sweden |
3 | Pshero 16 | 保加利亚Bulgaria | 60 | Triticale H | 瑞典Sweden |
4 | LT 259/72 | 波兰Poland | 61 | Triticale L | 瑞典Sweden |
5 | LT 344/72 | 波兰Poland | 62 | Triticale N | 瑞典Sweden |
6 | Kiskum | 波兰Poland | 63 | Triticale P | 瑞典Sweden |
7 | Lasko | 波兰Poland | 64 | Triticale R | 瑞典Sweden |
8 | Ugo | 波兰Poland | 65 | Hybrid 46-131 | 瑞士Switzerland |
9 | Riebesel 47/51 | 德国Germany | 66 | Odesskij Kormovoj | 乌克兰Ukraine |
10 | Riebesel 47/52 | 德国Germany | 67 | ADL 2 | 乌克兰Ukraine |
11 | Salzmunder Bartweizen | 德国Germany | 68 | AD 19 | 乌克兰Ukraine |
12 | Riebesel 48 | 德国Germany | 69 | Zitnica 1 | 乌克兰Ukraine |
13 | 8A221 | 德国Germany | 70 | Dneprovskij | 乌克兰Ukraine |
14 | 71/2956 | 俄罗斯Russia | 71 | NAD-762-7 | 乌克兰Ukraine |
15 | 223/845 | 俄罗斯Russia | 72 | Triticale 9 | 西班牙Spain |
16 | 38 | 俄罗斯Russia | 73 | 6TA386 | 匈牙利Hungary |
17 | 539/1549 | 俄罗斯Russia | 74 | 20 | 匈牙利Hungary |
18 | Wheatgrass Hybrid 599 | 俄罗斯Russia | 75 | WH10-4 | 中国China |
19 | AD 114 | 俄罗斯Russia | 76 | WH11-4 | 中国China |
20 | NAD 236 | 俄罗斯Russia | 77 | WH13-4 | 中国China |
21 | 1 AD 545 | 俄罗斯Russia | 78 | 中饲1048 Zhongsi 1048 | 中国China |
22 | 2 AD 325 | 俄罗斯Russia | 79 | WH08-2 | 中国China |
23 | Spontanyi Kanova 1185 | 俄罗斯Russia | 80 | WH12-1 | 中国China |
24 | Oktoploid Derzhavina | 俄罗斯Russia | 81 | WH12-2 | 中国China |
25 | STNIISM-1 | 俄罗斯Russia | 82 | WH12-4 | 中国China |
26 | 71-1795 | 俄罗斯Russia | 83 | WH14-2 | 中国China |
27 | PRAO 6/1 | 俄罗斯Russia | 84 | NTH1933 | 中国China |
28 | Kazanskij 4 | 俄罗斯Russia | 85 | 石大1号小黑麦 Shida No.1 triticale | 中国China |
29 | Oktoploid Derzavina | 俄罗斯Russia | 86 | WH17-1 | 中国China |
30 | PRAO-5/2 | 俄罗斯Russia | 87 | WH17-2 | 中国China |
31 | Stavropol'skij Ⅰ | 俄罗斯Russia | 88 | WH17-3 | 中国China |
32 | PRAG-119 | 俄罗斯Russia | 89 | WH17-4 | 中国China |
33 | 8A-91 | 加拿大Canada | 90 | WH17-5 | 中国China |
34 | TF 2 | 罗马尼亚Romania | 91 | 中饲237 Zhongsi 237 | 中国China |
35 | 6TA203 | 美国America | 92 | 冀饲3号 Jisi No.3 | 中国China |
36 | Morrison | 美国America | 93 | 中饲1257 Zhongsi 1257 | 中国China |
37 | M85-7050 | 美国America | 94 | 中饲1877 Zhongsi 1877 | 中国China |
38 | Eve | 美国America | 95 | NTH1888 | 中国China |
39 | Mammoth | 美国America | 96 | 中饲1640 Zhongsi 1640 | 中国China |
40 | KT941276pb003 | 美国America | 97 | 甘农2号 Gannong No.2 | 中国China |
41 | 6TA131 | 美国America | 98 | 冀饲2号 Jisi No.2 | 中国China |
42 | AM 2147 | 美国America | 99 | NTH2736 | 中国China |
43 | OK 78828 | 美国America | 100 | WOH939 | 中国China |
44 | 8A-148 | 美国America | 101 | 牧乐3000 Mule 3000 | 中国China |
45 | Newcale | 美国America | 102 | 中饲3297 Zhongsi 3297 | 中国China |
46 | Breaker | 美国America | 103 | 中饲2712 Zhongsi 2712 | 中国China |
47 | Gaucho | 美国America | 104 | 甘农C6 Gannong C6 | 中国China |
48 | Triti-Gold 22 | 美国America | 105 | 甘农C10 Gannong C10 | 中国China |
49 | UCRTCL2-2001 | 美国America | 106 | 甘农C23 Gannong C23 | 中国China |
50 | UCRTCL3-2002 | 美国America | 107 | 4鉴34 4 jian 34 | 中国China |
51 | KT941256h003 | 美国America | 108 | 5鉴54 5 jian 54 | 中国China |
52 | KT941256h3066 | 美国America | 109 | 5鉴2 5 jian 2 | 中国China |
53 | Salmon | 日本Japan | 110 | AMYP | 中国China |
54 | 18 | 日本Japan | 111 | ADMII | 中国China |
55 | 87 | 日本Japan | 112 | 5鉴64 5 jian 64 | 中国China |
56 | Triticale A | 瑞典Sweden | 113 | 5鉴50 5 jian 50 | 中国China |
57 | Amphydiploid O | 瑞典Sweden |
年度 Year | 项目 Item | 单株鲜草 产量 FW (g) | 单株干草 产量 DW (g) | 鲜干比 FDR | 粗蛋白含量 CP content (%) | 中性洗涤纤维含量NDF content (%) | 酸性洗涤纤维 含量ADF content (%) | 相对饲用价值 RFV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 最大值Maximum | 111.560 | 27.000 | 4.370 | 13.259 | 74.850 | 42.780 | 128.150 |
最小值Minimum | 36.000 | 12.000 | 2.380 | 6.894 | 48.480 | 26.600 | 69.650 | |
平均值Mean | 60.252 | 18.686 | 3.233 | 9.672 | 64.834 | 35.198 | 89.110 | |
变异系数CV(%) | 18.798 | 17.660 | 10.450 | 12.076 | 7.706 | 9.762 | 11.963 | |
2019-2020 | 最大值Maximum | 159.780 | 30.150 | 6.210 | 14.304 | 67.980 | 39.280 | 113.170 |
最小值Minimum | 36.310 | 9.150 | 2.610 | 6.680 | 53.850 | 29.000 | 79.840 | |
平均值Mean | 67.821 | 16.296 | 4.187 | 10.448 | 60.461 | 34.109 | 96.307 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 30.813 | 26.939 | 15.690 | 11.960 | 4.725 | 6.368 | 7.242 | |
平均 Average | 最大值Maximum | 113.390 | 23.950 | 4.780 | 12.802 | 68.750 | 39.370 | 112.930 |
最小值Minimum | 37.210 | 11.340 | 2.730 | 7.684 | 53.920 | 29.000 | 79.240 | |
平均值Mean | 64.037 | 17.491 | 3.710 | 10.060 | 62.648 | 34.654 | 92.709 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 21.274 | 17.941 | 10.296 | 8.449 | 4.565 | 6.262 | 7.018 | |
F值 F value | 品种Varieties | 5.282** | 2.174** | 1.473** | 4.298** | 15.839** | 8.705** | 13.533** |
年度Year | 47.480** | 32.071** | 253.342** | 97.436** | 1015.712** | 51.894** | 441.373** | |
品种×年度Varieties×year | 2.714** | 1.108 | 1.175 | 4.307** | 16.756** | 6.436** | 12.743** | |
多样性指数H′ | 1.974 | 2.037 | 2.057 | 2.042 | 2.006 | 2.075 | 2.059 |
Table 2 The yield, quality traits and variance analysis of triticale forage
年度 Year | 项目 Item | 单株鲜草 产量 FW (g) | 单株干草 产量 DW (g) | 鲜干比 FDR | 粗蛋白含量 CP content (%) | 中性洗涤纤维含量NDF content (%) | 酸性洗涤纤维 含量ADF content (%) | 相对饲用价值 RFV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018-2019 | 最大值Maximum | 111.560 | 27.000 | 4.370 | 13.259 | 74.850 | 42.780 | 128.150 |
最小值Minimum | 36.000 | 12.000 | 2.380 | 6.894 | 48.480 | 26.600 | 69.650 | |
平均值Mean | 60.252 | 18.686 | 3.233 | 9.672 | 64.834 | 35.198 | 89.110 | |
变异系数CV(%) | 18.798 | 17.660 | 10.450 | 12.076 | 7.706 | 9.762 | 11.963 | |
2019-2020 | 最大值Maximum | 159.780 | 30.150 | 6.210 | 14.304 | 67.980 | 39.280 | 113.170 |
最小值Minimum | 36.310 | 9.150 | 2.610 | 6.680 | 53.850 | 29.000 | 79.840 | |
平均值Mean | 67.821 | 16.296 | 4.187 | 10.448 | 60.461 | 34.109 | 96.307 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 30.813 | 26.939 | 15.690 | 11.960 | 4.725 | 6.368 | 7.242 | |
平均 Average | 最大值Maximum | 113.390 | 23.950 | 4.780 | 12.802 | 68.750 | 39.370 | 112.930 |
最小值Minimum | 37.210 | 11.340 | 2.730 | 7.684 | 53.920 | 29.000 | 79.240 | |
平均值Mean | 64.037 | 17.491 | 3.710 | 10.060 | 62.648 | 34.654 | 92.709 | |
变异系数CV (%) | 21.274 | 17.941 | 10.296 | 8.449 | 4.565 | 6.262 | 7.018 | |
F值 F value | 品种Varieties | 5.282** | 2.174** | 1.473** | 4.298** | 15.839** | 8.705** | 13.533** |
年度Year | 47.480** | 32.071** | 253.342** | 97.436** | 1015.712** | 51.894** | 441.373** | |
品种×年度Varieties×year | 2.714** | 1.108 | 1.175 | 4.307** | 16.756** | 6.436** | 12.743** | |
多样性指数H′ | 1.974 | 2.037 | 2.057 | 2.042 | 2.006 | 2.075 | 2.059 |
性状 Traits | 中国China | 俄罗斯Russia | 美国America | 瑞典Sweden | 其余国家Others | F值 F value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值Mean | 变异系数CV (%) | 平均值Mean | 变异系数CV (%) | 平均值Mean | 变异系数CV (%) | 平均值Mean | 变异系数CV (%) | 平均值Mean | 变异系数CV (%) | ||
单株鲜草产量FW (g) | 62.223 | 17.930 | 64.276 | 29.905 | 62.793 | 15.248 | 60.809 | 14.500 | 68.438 | 22.908 | 1.319 |
单株干草产量DW (g) | 17.653 | 16.872 | 16.873 | 22.383 | 16.424 | 13.922 | 17.243 | 9.688 | 18.526 | 19.327 | 1.897 |
鲜干比FDR | 3.589 | 10.371 | 3.830 | 10.315 | 3.915 | 9.030 | 3.558 | 10.029 | 3.705 | 9.449 | 1.879 |
粗蛋白含量CP content (%) | 10.330 | 7.728 | 10.100 | 8.938 | 10.063 | 7.959 | 9.239 | 9.503 | 9.914 | 7.616 | 3.070* |
中性洗涤纤维含量NDF content (%) | 62.402 | 5.275 | 63.218 | 4.597 | 61.845 | 3.285 | 64.670 | 3.607 | 62.491 | 4.198 | 1.378 |
酸性洗涤纤维含量ADF content (%) | 35.213 | 5.283 | 34.792 | 6.586 | 33.716 | 5.855 | 35.964 | 4.132 | 33.971 | 7.211 | 3.514** |
相对饲用价值RFV | 92.527 | 7.791 | 91.769 | 6.870 | 94.760 | 5.375 | 88.182 | 5.142 | 93.700 | 6.973 | 1.666 |
Table 3 Variations in forage yield and quality traits of triticale germplasms from different sources
性状 Traits | 中国China | 俄罗斯Russia | 美国America | 瑞典Sweden | 其余国家Others | F值 F value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值Mean | 变异系数CV (%) | 平均值Mean | 变异系数CV (%) | 平均值Mean | 变异系数CV (%) | 平均值Mean | 变异系数CV (%) | 平均值Mean | 变异系数CV (%) | ||
单株鲜草产量FW (g) | 62.223 | 17.930 | 64.276 | 29.905 | 62.793 | 15.248 | 60.809 | 14.500 | 68.438 | 22.908 | 1.319 |
单株干草产量DW (g) | 17.653 | 16.872 | 16.873 | 22.383 | 16.424 | 13.922 | 17.243 | 9.688 | 18.526 | 19.327 | 1.897 |
鲜干比FDR | 3.589 | 10.371 | 3.830 | 10.315 | 3.915 | 9.030 | 3.558 | 10.029 | 3.705 | 9.449 | 1.879 |
粗蛋白含量CP content (%) | 10.330 | 7.728 | 10.100 | 8.938 | 10.063 | 7.959 | 9.239 | 9.503 | 9.914 | 7.616 | 3.070* |
中性洗涤纤维含量NDF content (%) | 62.402 | 5.275 | 63.218 | 4.597 | 61.845 | 3.285 | 64.670 | 3.607 | 62.491 | 4.198 | 1.378 |
酸性洗涤纤维含量ADF content (%) | 35.213 | 5.283 | 34.792 | 6.586 | 33.716 | 5.855 | 35.964 | 4.132 | 33.971 | 7.211 | 3.514** |
相对饲用价值RFV | 92.527 | 7.791 | 91.769 | 6.870 | 94.760 | 5.375 | 88.182 | 5.142 | 93.700 | 6.973 | 1.666 |
性状 Traits | 单株鲜草产量FW | 单株干草产量 DW | 鲜干比 FDR | 粗蛋白含量 CP content | 中性洗涤纤维含量 NDF content | 酸性洗涤纤维含量 ADF content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单株干草产量DW | 0.667** | |||||
鲜干比FDR | 0.312** | -0.433** | ||||
粗蛋白含量CP content | 0.008 | -0.120** | 0.190** | |||
中性洗涤纤维含量NDF content | -0.019 | 0.103** | -0.205** | -0.254** | ||
酸性洗涤纤维含量ADF content | 0.048 | -0.055 | -0.057 | -0.194** | 0.716** | |
相对饲用价值RFV | -0.007 | -0.084* | 0.151** | 0.247** | -0.959** | -0.869** |
Table 4 Correlation between forage yield and quality traits of triticale germplasm
性状 Traits | 单株鲜草产量FW | 单株干草产量 DW | 鲜干比 FDR | 粗蛋白含量 CP content | 中性洗涤纤维含量 NDF content | 酸性洗涤纤维含量 ADF content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单株干草产量DW | 0.667** | |||||
鲜干比FDR | 0.312** | -0.433** | ||||
粗蛋白含量CP content | 0.008 | -0.120** | 0.190** | |||
中性洗涤纤维含量NDF content | -0.019 | 0.103** | -0.205** | -0.254** | ||
酸性洗涤纤维含量ADF content | 0.048 | -0.055 | -0.057 | -0.194** | 0.716** | |
相对饲用价值RFV | -0.007 | -0.084* | 0.151** | 0.247** | -0.959** | -0.869** |
性状 Traits | 纤维品质因子 Fiber quality factor | 饲草产量因子 Forage yield factor | 综合品质因子 Comprehensive quality factor |
---|---|---|---|
单株鲜草产量FW | -0.003 | 0.900 | 0.049 |
单株干草产量DW | 0.157 | 0.886 | -0.036 |
粗蛋白含量CP content | 0.152 | -0.063 | 0.821 |
中性洗涤纤维含量NDF content | 0.957 | 0.081 | 0.154 |
酸性洗涤纤维含量ADF content | 0.963 | 0.080 | 0.091 |
相对饲用价值RFV | 0.060 | 0.075 | 0.842 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 1.894 | 1.618 | 1.419 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 31.573 | 26.970 | 23.655 |
累积贡献率Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 31.573 | 58.543 | 82.198 |
Table 5 Principal component analysis of forage yield and quality traits of triticale forage
性状 Traits | 纤维品质因子 Fiber quality factor | 饲草产量因子 Forage yield factor | 综合品质因子 Comprehensive quality factor |
---|---|---|---|
单株鲜草产量FW | -0.003 | 0.900 | 0.049 |
单株干草产量DW | 0.157 | 0.886 | -0.036 |
粗蛋白含量CP content | 0.152 | -0.063 | 0.821 |
中性洗涤纤维含量NDF content | 0.957 | 0.081 | 0.154 |
酸性洗涤纤维含量ADF content | 0.963 | 0.080 | 0.091 |
相对饲用价值RFV | 0.060 | 0.075 | 0.842 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 1.894 | 1.618 | 1.419 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 31.573 | 26.970 | 23.655 |
累积贡献率Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 31.573 | 58.543 | 82.198 |
1 | Sun Y S. Research and application of genetics and breeding of triticale in China. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Science and Technology Press, 2002. |
孙元枢. 中国小黑麦遗传育种研究与应用. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社, 2002. | |
2 | Zillinsky F J. The development of triticale. Advances in Agronomy, 1974, 26: 315-348. |
3 | Dyda M, Tyrka M, Gołębiowska G, et al. Genetic mapping of adult-plant resistance genes to powdery mildew in triticale. Journal of Applied Genetics, 2021, 63(1): 73-86. |
4 | Blum A. The abiotic stress response and adaptation of triticale-A review. Cereal Research Communications, 2014, 42(3): 359-375. |
5 | Müller M C, Kunz L, Graf J, et al. Host adaptation through hybridization: Genome analysis of triticale powdery mildew reveals unique combination of lineage-specific effectors. Molecular Plant-microbe Interactions, 2021, 34(12): 1350-1357. |
6 | Chen R Y, Cheng J, Zheng C X, et al. Analysis on adaptability of forage triticale. Seed, 2010, 29(6): 81-83. |
陈柔屹, 程江, 郑常祥, 等. 饲用小黑麦适应性分析. 种子, 2010, 29(6): 81-83. | |
7 | Lekgari L A, Baenziger P S, Vogel K P, et al. Identifying winter forage triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) strains for the central great plains. Crop Science, 2008, 48(5): 2040-2048. |
8 | Estrada-campuzano G, Slafer G A, Miralles D J. Differences in yield, biomass and their components between triticale and wheat grown under contrasting water and nitrogen environments. Field Crops Research, 2012, 128: 167-179. |
9 | Mergoum M, Gómez-macpherson H. Triticale improvement and production. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2004. |
10 | Song H X, Xu Y X, Wang C W. Research on suitable cutting and drying period for forage triticale hay production. Crops, 2003(6): 29-31. |
宋慧欣, 许永新, 王崇旺. 饲草小黑麦干草生产适宜割、晒期研究. 作物杂志, 2003(6): 29-31. | |
11 | Dai H L, Tian X H, Du W H, et al. Study on grass yield and nutrient quality of forage type triticale in Gannan area. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(2): 66-72. |
代寒凌, 田新会, 杜文华, 等. 甘南地区饲用型小黑麦草产量及营养品质研究. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(2): 66-72. | |
12 | Liu J, Song Q, Tian X H, et al. Evaluation of the adaptability of triticale genotypes using membership function and GGE-Biplot analysis. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(5): 85-96. |
刘晶, 宋谦, 田新会, 等. 基于隶属函数法和GGE双标图的饲草型小黑麦种质适应性评价. 草业学报, 2018, 27(5): 85-96. | |
13 | He P L, Wang Y M, Jie H D, et al. Effects of different cutting time on the forage yield and nutritional quality of forage triticale. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2609-2614. |
何鹏亮, 汪娅梅, 揭红东, 等. 不同刈割期对饲用小黑麦草产量和营养品质的影响. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2609-2614. | |
14 | Wang R Q, Wang Y W, Xu X Y, et al. Correlation and cluster analysis of agronomic traits of triticale germplasm. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 52(9): 1591-1599. |
王瑞清, 王有武, 徐晓燕, 等. 小黑麦种质资源农艺性状的相关及聚类分析. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(9): 1591-1599. | |
15 | Kuleung C, Baenziger P S, Kachman S D, et al. Evaluating the genetic diversity of triticale with wheat and rye SSR markers. Crop Science, 2006, 46(4): 1692-1700. |
16 | Institute of Agricultural Quality Standards and Testing Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (National Feed Quality Supervision and Inspection Center). Determination of crude protein in feed-Kjeldahl method, GB/T 6432-2018. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2018. |
中国农业科学院农业质量标准与检测技术研究所(国家饲料质量监督检验中心). 饲料中粗蛋白的测定-凯氏定氮法, GB/T 6432-2018. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2018. | |
17 | Yang S. Feed analysis and feed quality testing technology. Beijing: Beijing Agricultural University Press, 1993. |
杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1993. | |
18 | Hu H L, Lu Y. Forage grading index technology-New progress in forage quality assessment. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2011, 32(Z1): 155-158. |
胡红莲, 卢媛. 粗饲料分级指数技术-粗饲料品质评定的新进展. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2011, 32(Z1): 155-158. | |
19 | Liang G L, Liu W H, Ma X. Phenotypic diversity of the panicle among 590 covered oats germplasm resources in apline of Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 495-503. |
梁国玲, 刘文辉, 马祥. 590份皮燕麦种质资源穗部性状遗传多样性分析. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 495-503. | |
20 | Zhu X K, Sun J Y, Guo W S, et al. Characteristics of forage yield and quality of different triticale varieties. Barley and Cereal Sciences, 2010(3): 1-7. |
朱新开, 孙建勇, 郭文善, 等. 不同类型小黑麦饲草产量和品质特性研究. 大麦与谷类科学, 2010(3): 1-7. | |
21 | Jin X N. Genetic analysis and QTL mapping on the forage yield related traits in forage triticale based on the RIL population. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2021. |
金星娜. 饲用型小黑麦RIL群体草产量相关性状的遗传分析及QTL定位. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2021. | |
22 | Cao L P, Kong G C. Research and application of physiological ecology and genetic breeding of triticale. Beijing: Economics and Management Press, 2011. |
曹连莆, 孔广超. 小黑麦生理生态及遗传育种研究与应用. 北京: 经济管理出版社, 2011. | |
23 | Filho A E, Carvalho G G P, Pires A J V, et al. Intake and ingestive behavior in lambs fed low-digestibility forages. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2016, 48(7): 1315-1321. |
24 | Zhao F Y, Zhao Y J, Tian X H, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of forage yield and nutritional value of 30 triticale cultivars in semi-arid irrigation area of Lintao, Gansu Province. Grassland and Turf, 2021, 41(4): 10-16. |
赵方媛, 赵雅姣, 田新会, 等. 30个小黑麦品种在甘肃临洮县半干旱灌区的草产量及营养价值综合评价. 草原与草坪, 2021, 41(4): 10-16. | |
25 | Wei C M, Xu W M, Xing Y F, et al. Genotype×environment interaction effect of waxy maize varieties in Huang-Huai-Hai Region. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2021, 52(4): 888-896. |
魏常敏, 许卫猛, 邢永锋, 等. 黄淮海糯玉米品种基因型与环境互作效应分析. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(4): 888-896. | |
26 | Guo Y H, Pu X J, Pu X P, et al. Change tendency of the aboveground biomass and nutrition quality in the Alpine Pastoral Area of Qinghai Tibet. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 734-742. |
郭艳红, 蒲小剑, 蒲小朋, 等. 青藏高寒牧区天然草地地上生物量和营养品质的变化规律. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 734-742. | |
27 | Zhao F Y, Du W H, Qu G P, et al. Studies on the production performance and nutritional value of new rye line C32 in pastoral areas of Tibet. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(1): 279-284. |
赵方媛, 杜文华, 曲广鹏, 等. 黑麦新品系C32在西藏牧区的生产性能和营养价值研究. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 279-284. | |
28 | Mazen A, Lori O, Susan A, et al. Variability, heritability and genetic advance in some agronomic and forage quality characters of spring triticale in western Canada. Communications in Agricultural and Applied Biological Sciences, 2014, 79(4): 9-18. |
29 | Vega-garcía J I, López-gonzález F, Morales-almaraz E, et al. Grazed rain-fed small-grain cereals as a forage option for small-scale dairy systems in central Mexico. Research Square, 2021, 53(5): 511. |
30 | Ayalew H, Kumssa T T, Butler T J, et al. Triticale improvement for forage and cover crop uses in the southern great plains of the United States. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 01130. |
31 | Wang Y H, Yu C L, Gao Y G, et al. Study on nutritional quality and correlation of different alfalfa varieties. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(2): 11-15. |
王彦华, 余春林, 高永革, 等. 不同紫花苜蓿品种营养品质及相关性研究. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(2): 11-15. | |
32 | Tan X Y, Yan J, Fan Y, et al. Dynamic analysis and genotypic screening of nutrient content of forage oats at different growth stages. Seed, 2019, 38(11): 20-28. |
谭秀英, 严俊, 范昱, 等. 不同生育时期饲用燕麦养分含量的动态分析及基因型筛选. 种子, 2019, 38(11): 20-28. | |
33 | Zhang Y, Zhang W, Zhao W J, et al. Variety screening and study of cultivation technology for forage triticale varieties based on principal component and grey relation analysis. Crops, 2020(3): 117-124. |
张阳, 张伟, 赵威军, 等. 基于主成分与灰色关联分析的饲草小黑麦品种筛选与配套技术研究. 作物杂志, 2020(3): 117-124. | |
34 | Yang Y Z, Zhou W Q, Lian X R, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of production characteristics of annual forage crops based on principal component analysis: A case study of Zhuanglang in Gansu. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(6): 1503-1509. |
杨彦忠, 周文期, 连晓荣, 等. 基于主成分分析综合评价一年生饲草的生产性能—以甘肃庄浪为例. 草业科学, 2018, 35(6): 1503-1509. | |
35 | Dai P H. Genetic diversity and association analysis of agronomic traits for upland cotton core germplasm based on SSR markers. Jingzhou: Yangtze University, 2016. |
代攀虹. 陆地棉核心种质遗传多样性及其农艺性状与SSR关联分析. 荆州: 长江大学, 2016. | |
36 | Li X S. Effects of germplasm resources of Leymus chinensis from different geographical sources on soil properties in common garden. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2021. |
李贤松. 不同地理来源羊草种质资源对同质园土壤性状的影响研究. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2021. |
[1] | Ce YANG, Yu-xue ZHANG, He ZHANG, Chun-yan ZHENG, Feng ZHU. Recent advances in understanding the ecosystem functioning of diverse forage mixtures [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(9): 206-219. |
[2] | Wei GAO, Na SHOU, Cong-ze JIANG, Ren-shi MA, Yu-ying SHEN, Xian-long YANG. Effect of nitrogen application rate on dry matter accumulation, allocation and water use efficiency of forage sorghum [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(9): 26-35. |
[3] | Min-hua YIN, Yan-lin MA, Yan-xia KANG, Qiong JIA, Guang-ping QI, Jing-hai WANG. Effects of nitrogen application on alfalfa yield and quality in China-A Meta-analysis [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(9): 36-49. |
[4] | Yan-liang SUN, Jun-wei ZHAO, Xuan-shuai LIU, Sheng-yi LI, Chun-hui MA, Xu-zhe WANG, Qian-bing ZHANG. Effect of nitrogen application on photosynthetic daily variation, leaf morphology and dry matter yield of alfalfa at the early flowering growth stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(9): 63-75. |
[5] | Xing WANG, Wei HUANG, Shu-yan YU, Xiao-yun LI, Xue-qin GAO, Bing-zhe FU. Effect of water and fertilizer coupling on seed yield and composition of alfalfa grown with underground drip irrigation in Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(9): 76-85. |
[6] | Zi-wei JIANG, Gui-yu LIU, Hao-yun AN, Wei SHI, Sheng-hua CHANG, Cheng ZHANG, Qian-min JIA, Fu-jiang HOU. Effects of planting density and nitrogen application on forage yield, quality and nitrogen use efficiency in a maize/forage soybean intercropping system [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(7): 157-171. |
[7] | Duo ZHANG, Lan-tao LI, Di LIN, Long-hui ZHENG, Sai-nan GENG, Wen-xuan SHI, Kai SHENG, Yu-hong MIAO, Yi-lun WANG. Effects of P fertilization rate on tuber yield, quality, plant physiological attributes and P use efficiency of Helianthus tuberosus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6): 139-149. |
[8] | Yong-liang YOU, Hai-ming ZHAO, Yuan LI, Rui-xin WU, Gui-bo LIU, Jian-dong ZHOU, Jun-feng CHEN. Dynamic changes in biomass accumulation and nutritional quality of triticeae forages [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6): 189-201. |
[9] | You-shun JIN, Fu-jiang HOU. Determination of the nutrient digestibility of herbage consumed by grazing animals [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(5): 200-212. |
[10] | Man-you LI, Dong-ning LI, Bin WANG, Xiao-yun LI, Xiao-tian SHEN, Li-juan CAO, Wang NI, Teng-fei WANG, Jian LAN. The effect of mixed sowing and sowing rate of different alfalfa varieties on the yield and quality of forage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(5): 61-75. |
[11] | Chun-zeng LIU, Chun-feng ZHENG, Liang-peng NIE, Lin ZHANG, Ji-shi ZHANG, Yu-hu LV, Ben-yin LI, Wei-dong CAO. Effects of foliar spray with various bioactive compounds on seed number and seed weight of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus) [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(5): 76-83. |
[12] | Li-min GAO, Chun CHEN, Yi-xin SHEN. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer rates on forage dry matter yield and regrowth of alfalfa in seasonal cultivation systems [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 43-52. |
[13] | Man-you LI, Yan-jun YANG, Bin WANG, Xiao-tian SHEN, Li-juan CAO, Xiao-yun LI, Wang NI, Jian LAN. Yield, forage quality and a multivariate evaluation of Avena sativa and Vicia villosa in different mixed planting patterns under drip irrigation in an arid area of Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 62-71. |
[14] | Hai-yan WU, Ni QU, Zhen QU, Tongsangcuomu, Dawazhuoga, Deyang, Nimazhuoga, Zhao-ming LIU, Yu-shou MA. Comparison of crop yield and forage quality of six oat varieties in Angren County, Shigatse [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 72-80. |
[15] | Qi-yu LIU, Lan YUN, Yi-fan CHEN, Hong-yu GUO, Zhen LI, Zhi-qi GAO, Jun WANG, Feng-ling SHI. The dynamic analysis of forage yield and interspecific competition in alfalfa-grass mixed pasture [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 181-191. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||