干旱胁迫下黄花苜蓿与蒺藜苜蓿两个抑制性差减杂交文库的构建及分析

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 水分胁迫是植物面临的最主要的非生物胁迫之一,研究植物的抗旱机理以提高植物的抗旱能力具有重大的意义。抑制性差减杂交是一种筛选特异表达基因的良好手段,使用该方法成功构建了豆科植物黄花苜蓿和蒺藜苜蓿2个差减文库并进行测序。通过GO分类和KEGG分析等手段对文库中序列进行分类,并分析表达序列的差异,发现黄花苜蓿文库中对抵抗水分胁迫起积极作用的基因表达序列明显多于蒺藜苜蓿。此外,还对筛选到的2个基因在2种苜蓿中的干旱响应表达模式进行了分析,结果表明,在黄花苜蓿中这2个基因的表达更加有利于响应和抵抗干旱。这些结果在分子层面上一定程度的解释了黄花苜蓿较蒺藜苜蓿更加抗旱的原因。

Abstract: Drought is one of the commonest abiotic stresses for plant growth and development. Understanding the mechanisms underlying the tolerance of plants to drought stress is of critical importance for the improvement of plant drought tolerance. Suppression subtractive hybridization (SSH) is a useful tool to identify genes that are differentially expressed. In this study, two cDNA libraries from the leguminous plants Medicago falcata and M. truncatula were constructed and sequenced. The sequences of the two cDNA libraries were classified by GO and KEGG, and the differential expression was analyzed. The number of genes associated with drought resistance was greater in M. falcata than in M. truncatula. The expression levels of the two genes were positively correlated with the tolerance of the two species to drought stress and were higher in M. falcata than in M. truncatula. These results may provide a molecular explanation for some of the greater tolerance to drought stress of M. falcata than M. truncatula.

中图分类号:

王天佐,赵敏桂,张文浩. 干旱胁迫下黄花苜蓿与蒺藜苜蓿两个抑制性差减杂交文库的构建及分析[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(6): 175-181.

WANG Tian-zuo, ZHAO Min-gui, ZHANG Wen-hao. Construction and analyses of two suppression subtractive hybridization libraries of Medicago falcata and Medicago truncatula under drought stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(6): 175-181.

参考文献

[1] Boyer J S. Plant productivity and environment[J]. Science, 1982, 218: 443-448.
[2] 山仑, 黄占斌, 张岁岐. 节水农业[M]. 北京:清华大学出版社和暨南大学出版社, 2000: 12-13.
[3] 陶岩. 中国东北地区天然草地中豆科植物的分布规律研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2005.
[4] 温都苏, 阿拉塔, 于斌. 内蒙古野生苜蓿种质资源及其开发利用前景[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学, 2004, 25(6): 72-74.
[5] 景艳霞, 袁庆华. NaCl胁迫对苜蓿幼苗生长及不同器官中盐离子分布的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 134-139.
[6] 刘晓静, 郝凤, 张德罡, 等. 抗冻基因CBF₂表达载体构建及转化紫花苜蓿的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 193-200.
[7] Pennycooke J C, Cheng H, Stockinger E J. Comparative genomic sequence and expression analyses of Medicago truncatula and alfalfa subspecies falcata COLD-ACCLIMATION-SPECIFIC genes[J]. Plant Physiology, 2008, 146: 1242-1254.
[8] Zhang L L, Zhao M G, Tian Q Y, et al. Comparative studies on tolerance of Medicago truncatula and Medicago falcata to freezing[J]. Planta, 2011, 234: 445-457.
[9] Li Y S, Gao Y, Tian Q Y, et al. Stimulation of root acid phosphatase by phosphorus deficiency is regulated by ethylene in Medicago falcata[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2011, 71: 114-120.
[10] Li Y S, Mao X T, Tian Q Y, et al. Phosphorus deficiency-induced reduction in root hydraulic conductivity is mediated by ethylene in Medicago falcata[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2009, 67: 172-177.
[11] 高艳, 田秋英, 石凤翎, 等. 黄花苜蓿与蒺藜苜蓿对土壤低磷胁迫适应策略的比较研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(6): 632-640.
[12] 吕世杰. 黄花苜蓿抗旱、耐盐生理特性及其抗性机理的初步研究[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2007.
[13] Cook D R. Medicago truncatula－a model in the making! Commentary[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 1999, 2: 301-304.
[14] Zhang J Y, Broeckling C D, Blancaflor E B, et al. Overexpression of WXP1, a putative Medicago truncatula AP2 domain-containing transcription factor gene, increases cuticular wax accumulation and enhances drought tolerance in transgenic alfalfa (Medicago sativa)[J]. Plant Journal, 2005, 42: 689-707.
[15] 魏臻武, 盖钧镒. 豆科模式植物——蒺藜苜蓿[J]. 草业学报, 2008, 17(1): 114-120.
[16] Wang T Z, Chen L, Zhao M G, et al. Identification of drought-responsive microRNAs in Medicago truncatula by genome-wide high-throughput sequencing[J]. BMC Genomics, 2011, 12: 367.
[17] Diatchenko L, Chrislau Y F, Campbell A P, et al. Suppression subtractive hybridization: a method for generating differentially regulatedor tissue-specific cDNA probe[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996, 93: 6025-6030.
[18] Puckette M, Peal L, Steele J, et al. Ozone responsive genes in Medicago truncatula: Analysis by suppression subtraction hybridization[J]. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2009, 166: 1284-1295.
[19] 韩明鹏, 王彦华, 高永, 等. 高温胁迫下紫花苜蓿抑制消减文库的构建[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(5): 126-132.
[20] Zheng J, Zhao J F, Tao Y Z, et al. Isolation and analysis of water stress induced genes in maize seedlings by subtractive PCR and cDNA macroarray[J].Plant Molecular Biology, 2004, 55: 807-823.
[21] Wang H G, Zhang H L, Gao F H, et al. Comparison of gene expression between upland and lowland rice cultivars under water stress using cDNA microarray[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2007, 115: 1109-1126.
[22] Ashburner M, Ball C A, Blake J A, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology[J]. Nature Genetics, 2000, 25: 25-29.
[23] Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2000, 28: 27-30.
[24] Zhou C, Han L, Pislariu C, et al. From model to crop: functional analysis of a STAY-GREEN gene in the model legume Medicago truncatula and effective use of the gene for Alfalfa improvement[J]. Plant Physiology, 2011, 157: 1483-1496.
[25] 张党权, 明付焕, 江平, 等. 绵毛优若藜冷诱导SSH文库构建研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2000, 30(2): 65-69.
[26] 叶武威, 赵云雷, 王俊娟, 等. 盐胁迫下陆地棉耐盐品种根系的抑制消减文库构建[J]. 棉花学报, 2009, 21(5): 339-345.
[27] 张俊红. 低磷胁迫大豆SSH文库构建与分析[D]. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2001.
[28] Ohmetakagi M, Shinshi H. Ethylene-inducible DNA binding proteins that interact with an ethylene-responsive element[J]. Plant Cell, 1995, 7: 173-182.
[29] Zhou J, Tang X, Martin G B. The Pto kinase conferring resistance to tomato bacterial speck disease interacts with proteins that bind a cis-element of pathogenesis-related genes[J]. EMBO Journal, 1997, 16: 3207-3232.
[30] 刘强, 赵南明. DREB转录因子在提高植物抗逆性中的作用[J]. 科学通报, 2000, 45(1): 11-16.
[31] Middleton P H, Jakab J, Penmetsa R V, et al. An ERF transcription factor in Medicago truncatula that is essential for nod factor signal transduction[J]. Plant Cell, 2007, 19: 1221-1234.
[32] 刘广宇, 魏令波, 陈吉龙, 等. 植物脱水素研究进展[J]. 生物工程进展, 2001, 21(2): 24-28.