呼伦贝尔草甸草原土壤呼吸及其影响因子对不同放牧强度的响应

草业学报 ›› 2013, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 22-29.

呼伦贝尔草甸草原土壤呼吸及其影响因子对不同放牧强度的响应

邓钰^1,2,柳小妮¹,闫瑞瑞²,王旭²,杨桂霞²,任正超¹,辛晓平^2*

1.甘肃农业大学草业学院,甘肃兰州 730070;
2.中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所草地科学研究室呼伦贝尔草原生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2011-11-15 出版日期:2013-02-25 发布日期:2013-04-20
通讯作者: E-mail:xinxp@sina.com
作者简介:邓钰(1986-),女,云南昭通人,在读硕士。E-mail:yndengyu@gmail.com
基金资助:
内蒙古自治区重大科技项目(20091403),国家973项目(2010CB833502),公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201003019,201003061,200903060),现代农业产业技术体系建设专项和国家自然基金(30960264)资助。

Soil respiration of Hulunber meadow steppe and response of its controlling factors to different grazing intensities

DENG Yu^1,2, LIU Xiao-ni¹, YAN Rui-rui², WANG Xu², YANG Gui-xia², REN Zheng-chao¹, XIN Xiao-ping²

1.College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China;
2.Hulunber Grassland Ecosystem Research Station, Laboratory of Grassland Science, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sicence, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2011-11-15 Online:2013-02-25 Published:2013-04-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 于2010年6-9月期间,采用LI-6400-09 Soil Chamber对呼伦贝尔草甸草原6个不同放牧强度处理下的土壤呼吸速率及其影响因子进行研究。结果表明,1)除R₁外,土壤含水量、根系生物量、地上生物量和枯落物等影响因子随着放牧强度增大而下降,而土壤温度却无统一的变化规律。2)试验期内,不同放牧强度下土壤呼吸速率的动态变化呈双峰型;土壤呼吸速率均值变化为:R₁>R₀>R₂>R₃>R₄>R₅,R₀和R₁间的差异不显著(P>0.05);除9月30日外,其余测试日下R₀和R₁的土壤呼吸速率均显著(P<0.05)高于R₅。土壤呼吸速率随着放牧强度的增大,放牧效应加剧,以R₄和R₅最为强烈。3)放牧强度因素对土壤呼吸的作用随着放牧季节(日期)的变化而变化,且二者存在互作效应。控制时间的偏相关分析表明,土壤呼吸速率与土壤温度、土壤含水量、根系生物量、地上生物量、枯落物呈显著正相关;而与放牧强度之间呈极显著负相关。研究表明,在呼伦贝尔草甸草原,较低的放牧强度(R₁)对土壤呼吸速率及其影响因子无不利影响,而较高的放牧强度(R₄和R₅)显著影响土壤呼吸速率及其影响因子的变化。

Abstract: From June to September in 2010, soil respiration was measured at six different grazing intensities in experimental plots in Hulunber meadow steppe using a LI-6400-09 Soil Chamber to understand the influence of different grazing intensities on soil respiration of grassland. The controlling factors of soil respiration were taken into account under different grazing intensities. 1) Soil water content, root biomass, above ground biomass, and litter accumulation decreased with an increase of grazing intensity. However, soil temperature had an irregular change pattern with an increase of grazing intensity. 2) The dynamic changes in soil respiration rate have a double peak curve from different grazing intensities during the whole experimental period, while the varied mode of the mean value of soil respiration rate can be expressed as R₁ >R₀ >R₂ >R₃ >R₄ >R₅. There was no significant difference between R₀ and R₁. The soil respiration rate was higher in R₀ and R₁ treatments than in the R₅ treatment except on September 30th. Soil respiration rate was dramatically influenced by grazing intensity, with a more intense response under the R₄ and R₅ grazing intensities. 3) The effect of grazing intensiy on soil respiration changed with variation of grazing season or date showing there was an interaction between them. The partial correlation of time analysis has shown that soil temperature, soil water content, root biomass, above ground biomass, litter accumulation had significantly positive correlations with soil respiration under different grazing intensities but there was a significantly negative correlation with grazing intensities. The lower grazing intensity (R₁) had no adverse effect on soil respiration rate and its controlling factors, while the higher grazing intensities (R₄ and R₅) have obviously influenced them.

中图分类号:

S812.2

邓钰,柳小妮,闫瑞瑞,王旭,杨桂霞,任正超,辛晓平. 呼伦贝尔草甸草原土壤呼吸及其影响因子对不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(2): 22-29.

DENG Yu, LIU Xiao-ni, YAN Rui-rui, WANG Xu, YANG Gui-xia, REN Zheng-chao, XIN Xiao-ping. Soil respiration of Hulunber meadow steppe and response of its controlling factors to different grazing intensities[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(2): 22-29.

参考文献

[1] 钟华平, 樊江文, 于贵瑞, 等. 草地生态系统碳蓄积的研究进展[J]. 草业科学, 2005, 22(1): 4-11.
[2] Schlesinger W H, Andrews J A. Soil respiration and the global carbon cycle[J]. Biogeochemistry, 2000, 48(1): 7-20.
[3] 任继周, 梁天刚, 林慧龙, 等. 草地对全球气候变化的响应及其碳汇潜势研究[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 1-22.
[4] Ojima D S, Parton W J, Schimel D S, et al. Modeling the effects of climate and CO₂ changes on grassland storage of soil[J]. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 1993, 70: 643-657.
[5] 唐华俊, 辛晓平, 杨桂霞, 等. 现代数字草业理论与技术研究进展及展望[J].中国草地学报, 2009, 31(4): 1-8.
[6] 张凡, 祁彪, 温飞, 等. 不同利用程度高寒干旱草地碳储量的变化特征分析[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(4): 11-18.
[7] 郭明英, 卫智军, 运向军, 等. 放牧对草原土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2011, 28(5): 729-736.
[8] 高英志, 韩兴国, 汪诗平. 放牧对草原土壤的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2004, 24(4): 790-797.
[9] Jia B R, Zhou G S, Wang F Y, et al. Effects of grazing on soil respiration of Leymus chinensis Steppe[J]. Climatic Change, 2007, 82: 211-223.
[10] Cao G M, Tang Y H, Mo W H, et al. Grazing intensity alters soil respiration in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2004, 36: 237-243.
[11] 李凌浩, 王其兵, 白永飞, 等. 锡林河流域羊草草原群落土壤呼吸及其影响因子的研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2000, 24(6): 680-686.
[12] 陈海军, 王明玖, 韩国栋, 等. 不同强度放牧对贝加尔针茅草原土壤微生物和土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2008, 22(4): 165-169.
[13] Wang Z W, Jiao S Y, Han G D, et al. Soil respiration response to different stocking rates on Stipa breviflora Griseb. Desert Steppe[J]. Journal of Inner Mongolia University, 2009, 40(2): 186-193.
[14] 车宗玺, 刘贤德, 王顺利, 等. 祁连山放牧草原土壤呼吸及影响因子分析[J]. 水土保持学报, 2008, 22(5): 172-174.
[15] Bremer D J, Ham J M, Owensby C E, et al. Responses of soil respiration to clipping and grazing in a Tallgrass Prairie[J]. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1998, 27(6): 1539-1548.
[16] Biondini M E, Bob D P, Paul E N. Grazing intensity and ecosystem processes in a northern mixed-grass prairie, USA[J]. Ecological Applications, 1998, 8: 469-479.
[17] Frank A B. Carbon dioxide fluxes over a grazed prairie and seeded pasture in the Northern Great Plains[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2002, 116(3): 397-403.
[18] LeCain D R, Morgan J A., Schuman G E, et al. Carbon exchange rates in grazed and ungrazed pastures of Wyoming[J]. Journal Range Manage, 2000, 53: 199-206.
[19] LeCain D R, Morgan J A, Schuman G E, et al. Carbon exchange and species composition of grazed pastures and exclosures in the shortgrass steppe of Colorado[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystem and Environment, 2002, 93: 421-435.
[20] 徐海红, 侯向阳, 那日苏. 不同放牧制度下短花针茅荒漠草原土壤呼吸动态研究[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 219-226.
[21] 闫玉春, 王旭, 李林芝, 等. 翻耕短期内对草原土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2010, 32(1): 75-78.
[22] 徐丽君, 唐华俊, 杨桂霞, 等. 不同苜蓿品种人工草地土壤呼吸及对土气温度反应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2010, 30(9): 1882-1886.
[23] 周萍, 刘国彬, 薛萐. 草地生态系统土壤呼吸及其影响因素研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 184-193.
[24] 王玉辉, 何兴元, 周广胜. 放牧强度对羊草草原的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2002, 10(1): 45-49.
[25] 王艳芬, 汪诗平. 不同放牧率对内蒙古典型草原地下生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 1999, 7(3): 198-203.
[26] 王艳芬, 汪诗平. 不同放牧率对内蒙古典型草原牧草地上现存量和净初级生产力及品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 1999, 8(1): 15-20.
[27] 李凌浩, 韩兴国, 王其兵, 等. 锡林河流域一个放牧草原群落中根系呼吸占土壤总呼吸比例的初步估计[J]. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(1): 29-32.
[28] 焦树英, 韩国栋, 李永强, 等. 不同载畜率对荒漠草原群落结构和功能群生产力的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2006, 26(3): 564-571.
[29] Han G X, Zhou G S, Xu Z Z, et al. Biotic and abiotic factors controlling the spatial and temporal variation of soil respiration in an agricultural ecosystem[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2007, 39: 418-425.
[30] Milchunas D G, Laurenroth W K. Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments[J]. Ecological Monographs, 1993, 63(4): 327-366.
[31] Collins S L, Knapp K, Briggs J M, et al. Modulation of diversity by grazing and mowing in native tall-grass prairie[J]. Science, 1998, (280): 745-747.
[32] 杨庆朋, 徐明, 刘洪升, 等. 土壤呼吸温度敏感性的影响因素和不确定性[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(8): 2301-2311.