种植密度对光敏型高丹草营养成分及动态变化的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2017469

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在黄土高原雨养农业区,以光敏型高丹草品种“大卡BMR”和“海牛”为材料,采用8.33、12.50和16.67万穴·hm^-2 3个低、中、高密度全膜平铺穴播种植,在植株不同生长阶段,测定了粗蛋白(CP)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)、酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)、总可消化养分(TDN)和糖锤度(BX)含量,以研究光敏型高丹草在当地的最佳种植密度和收获时期。结果表明:生长发育进程在植株营养形成过程中占主导地位。在品种间,两品种生长前期CP含量差异较大(P<0.05);“大卡BMR”的NDF、ADF和BX整体低于“海牛”,TDN含量高于“海牛”。密度对营养成分有影响,CP含量随密度的增大有所降低;密度对BX含量前期影响较大(P<0.05),中后期影响不明显(P>0.05);在全生长期内NDF和ADF含量整体上高密度处理明显低于(P<0.05)低密度处理;密度对TDN含量影响明显(P<0.05),生长后期(出苗后126~140 d)依次均为高密度>中密度>低密度。营养成分和产量的动态变化表现为,两品种随生长发育进程的延长,CP含量均呈逐渐下降的变化趋势,BX均呈逐渐上升的变化趋势,NDF和ADF含量均呈“升—降—升”的变化趋势,TDN含量均呈“降—升—降”的变化趋势;在出苗后126~140 d,干物质产量仍在上升,CP和TDN产量平稳,TDN的含量处于下降趋势。这种动态变化为北方不抽穗或能抽穗不能成熟的光敏型高丹草最佳刈割期的决策提供了重要依据。从饲草生产角度考虑,在春播一茬青贮收割模式下,当地以“大卡BMR”品种较好,种植密度以每公顷12.50万穴较好,两品种均在出苗后126~140 d(9月上中旬,大卡BMR处于抽穗期、海牛处于开花期)刈割最佳。

关键词: 种植密度, 发育阶段, 光敏型高丹草, 营养价值, 动态变化, 最佳刈割期

Abstract: This study investigated the optimum planting density and harvest date of photoperiod-sensitive (PPS) sorghum-sudangrass hybrids in the rain-fed farming region of the Loess Plateau. Two hybrids, “Big Kahuna BMR” and “Monster”, were planted with 3 different densities (83300, 125000 and 166700 holes·ha^-1) on double ridge soil covered with plastic-film fully mulched. The contents of crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), total digestible nutrient (TDN) and brix (BX) were measured in the plants at different growth stages. Results showed that the growth and development process played a major role in the formation of plant nutritional ingredients. The nutritional difference between the 2 varieties was more significant in the early than late growing stages. The NDF, ADF and BX contents of “Big Kahuna BMR” were all lower than “Monster”, while its TDN contents were higher. CP content declined with increased planting densities. BX contents were more influenced by density in the early than middle or late stages. For the entire growth period, NDF and ADF contents in higher density plantings were significantly lower. In the late growth period (126 to 140 d after seeding), TDN contents progressively decreased as density increased. As density increased, the 2 varieties’ CP contents gradually decreased during the growth process, while BX contents increased. NDF, ADF and TDN contents trended as ascent-descent-ascent from 70 to 140 d after seeding. In the final period of 126 to 140 d, dry matter yield continued to increase but CP and TDN contents did not change significantly (although TDN decreased slightly). These dynamic changes in nutrient content and yield indicate the best harvest date for PPS sorghum-sudangrass. In terms of forage production, the optimum variety for spring sowing with a one-cut system for silage is “Big Kahuna BMR”, with 125000 holes per hectare the preferred density. For both varieties, the optimum harvest period is between 126 to 140 d after seeding (in early or mid-September), when “Big Kahuna BMR” is booting and “Monster” is flowering.

Key words: planting density, growth stage, PPS sorghum-sudangrass hybrids, nutrition value, dynamic change, optimum harvest period

何振富, 贺春贵, 王国栋, 葛玉彬. 种植密度对光敏型高丹草营养成分及动态变化的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(10): 93-104.

HE Zhen-fu, HE Chun-gui, WANG Guo-dong, GE Yu-bin. Effect of planting density on plant nutrients and their dynamics in PPS sorghum-sudangrass hybrids[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(10): 93-104.

参考文献

[1] Rooney W L, Aydin S.Genetic control of a photoperiod-sensitive response in Sorghum bicolor (L.) moench. Crop Science, 1999, 39(2): 397-400.
[2] He C G, He Z F, Wang F.Efficient double cropping pattern of photoperiod-sensitive sorghum-sudangrass hybrids in summer after winter wheat. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(5): 70-80.
贺春贵, 何振富, 王斐. 光敏型高丹草复种穴播高效栽培模式研究. 草业学报, 2017, 26(5): 70-80.
[3] Yu Z, Yamada T.Comparative research on main characteristics of pacetter varieties. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2006, 28(6): 1-6.
于卓, 山田敏彦. 高丹草品种主要农艺性状的比较研究. 中国草地学报, 2006, 28(6): 1-6.
[4] Shao R F, Zhao W J, Zhang F Y, et al. Effects of detillering on agronomic traits of sweet sorghum. Crops, 2012, (1): 126-129.
邵荣峰, 赵威军, 张福耀, 等. 去除分蘖对甜高梁主要农艺性状的影响. 作物杂志, 2012, (1): 126-129.
[5] He C G, Zhang B L, Ma Y.A consideration about crop-forage-livestock dryland farming systems in Gansu. Gansu Agrigultural Scienge and Technology, 2013, 12: 8-11.
贺春贵, 张邦林, 马彦. 关于甘肃发展旱作草畜牧业生产体系的思考. 甘肃农业科技, 2013, 12: 8-11.
[6] Chen R Y, Feng Y C, Tang Q L, et al. Effect of sowing density on the yield and quality of Yucao No.1. Pratacultural Science, 2009, 26(6): 96-100.
陈柔屹, 冯云超, 唐祈林, 等. 种植密度对玉草1号产量与品质的影响. 草业科学, 2009, 26(6): 96-100.
[7] Springer T L, Dewald C L, Sims P L, et al. How does plant population density affect the forage yield of eastern gamagrass. Crop Science, 2003, 43: 2206-2211.
[8] Chen Y J, Li H, Li X, et al. Study on nutrient status and dynamics of Trifolium spp at different growing stages. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2013, 44(1): 101-105.
陈雅君, 李宏, 李雪, 等. 三叶草不同生长时期营养动态变化规律的研究. 东北农业大学学报, 2013, 44(1): 101-105.
[9] Zhao Y J, Tian X H, Du W H.Studies on the optimal cutting period of forage triticale in Dingxi area. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(7): 1143-1149.
赵雅姣, 田新会, 杜文华. 饲草型小黑麦在定西地区的最佳刈割期. 草业科学, 2015, 32(7): 1143-1149.
[10] Wang Y H, Wang C Z, Li D F, et al. Effects of seeding rate on plant number, production performance, and quality of alfalfa. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(2): 123-135.
王彦华, 王成章, 李德锋, 等. 播种量和品种对紫花苜蓿植株动态变化、产量及品质的影响. 草业学报, 2017, 26(2): 123-135.
[11] Wang Y L, Zheng M N, Han Z S.Growth dynamics and harvest period of Vicia sativa. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2016, 32(9): 71-76.
王雁丽, 郑敏娜, 韩志顺. 春箭筈豌豆生长动态及收割期的研究. 中国农学通报, 2016, 32(9): 71-76.
[12] Yang Q F, Teng H Y, Niu J L, et al. Studies on nutrient content dynamics and nutritive value of Huaxie 1 forage rape. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2003, 12(2): 87-92.
杨祁峰, 滕怀渊, 牛菊兰, 等. 饲用双低油菜华协1号营养成分含量动态及营养价值研究. 草业学报, 2003, 12(2): 87-92.
[13] Li Z J, Hu Y G.Biological characteristics of Secale cereale and its yield and nutrition dynamics. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2004, 13(1): 45-51.
李志坚, 胡跃高. 饲用黑麦生物学特性及其产量营养动态变化. 草业学报, 2004, 13(1): 45-51.
[14] Liu T Y, Zheng L, Li M Y, et al. Nutrients and sheep rumen degradation dynamics of red fescue at different growth stages. Journal of Northwest A & F University(Natural Science Edition), 2013, 41(9): 33-37.
刘太宇, 郑立, 李梦云, 等. 紫羊茅不同生长阶段营养成分及其瘤胃降解动态研究. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 41(9): 33-37.
[15] Chen P, Lou F, Gao J M, et al. Effects of different sowing times on qualities of sweet sorghum(Sorghum dochna) at different growth stages. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 40(5): 2608-2609, 2620.
陈鹏, 罗峰, 高建明, 等. 不同播期对不同生育时期甜高粱品质性状的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(5): 2608-2609, 2620.
[16] Li Y, Xie N, Zhao H M, et al. Analysis on change pattern of the vegetative growth and forage quality of Sorghum bicolor×Sorghum sudanense. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(5): 813-820.
李源, 谢楠, 赵海明, 等. 高丹草营养生长与饲用品质变化规律分析. 草地学报, 2011, 19(5): 813-820.
[17] Dvoǐáĉková J, Doležal P, Vyskoĉil I. Effect of the growing season duration of sorghum and Sudan grass hybrids on the chemical composition and digestibility of organic matter. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 2013, 61(6): 1629-1635.
[18] Deng Z L, Hu R M, Wang Z G, et al. Planting density is influence of growth, quality and yield of sweet sorghum hybridization sweet 1. Inner Mongolia Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013, (1): 20-23.
邓志兰, 呼瑞梅, 王振国, 等. 种植密度对杂交甜高粱通甜1号生长发育、品质及产量的影响. 内蒙古农业科技, 2013, (1): 20-23.
[19] Yang X K, Tian H Y, Chen S B, et al. Effect of different planting density on the sugar accumulation in sweet sorghum. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 22(1): 60-63.
杨相昆, 田海燕, 陈树宾, 等. 不同种植密度对甜高粱糖分积累的影响. 西南农业学报, 2009, 22(1): 60-63.
[20] Zhan Q W, Qian Z Q, Lin P, et al. Study on yield components and density of hybrid between sorghum [Sorghum bicolor(L.)] and sudangrass [Sorghum sudanense (Piper)]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2001, 17(5): 18-20.
詹秋文, 钱章强, 林平, 等. 高粱-苏丹草杂交种产量构成因子及最适密度的研究.中国农学通报, 2001, 17(5): 18-20.
[21] Li Y, Zhao H M, Xie N, et al. Effect of planting density and stubble height on production performance of Sorghum bicolor×Sorghum sudanense. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2012, 20(6): 1093-1096.
李源, 赵海明, 谢楠, 等. 种植密度和留茬高度对高丹草生产性能的影响. 草地学报, 2012, 20(6): 1093-1096.
[22] State Bureau of Technical Supervision. GB/T6432-1994, Method for the determination of crude protein in feedstuffs. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1995.
国家技术监督局. GB/T6432-1994, 饲料中粗蛋白测定方法. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1995.
[23] Institute of Animal Sciences of CAAS, Zhejiang University, Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, et al. GB/T20806-2006, Determination of neutral detergent fiber in feedstuffs. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2007.
中国农业科学院畜牧研究所, 浙江大学, 内蒙古畜牧科学院, 等. GB/T20806-2006, 饲料中中性洗涤纤维(NDF)的测定. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2007.
[24] Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. NY/T1459-2007, Determination of acid detergent fiber in feedstuff (ADF). Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2008.
中华人民共和国农业部. NY/T1459—2007, 饲料中酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)的测定. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[25] Zhang J K.Quality evaluation parameters of ruminant coarse fodder and their application comparison. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2006, 42(5): 47-50.
张吉鵾. 反刍家畜粗饲料品质评定的指标及其应用比较. 中国畜牧杂志, 2006, 42(5): 47-50.
[26] Chen G, Tai J H, Yan D.Scientific production technology solutions of alfalfa. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2011.
陈谷, 邰建辉, 颜俤. 苜蓿科学生产技术解决方案. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011.
[27] Tang Q Y, Feng M G.Practical statistical analysis and DPS data processing system. Beijing: Science Press, 2002.
唐启义, 冯明光. 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统. 北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
[28] He C G, He Z F.Plant-harvest models of forage sorghum in dry-farming area of Loess Plateau. The seventh (2017) China alfalfa industry development conference symposium. Lanzhou: China Animal Agriculture Association, China Strategic Innovation Alliance of Forage Industry Technology, 2017: 319-325.
贺春贵, 何振富. 黄土高原干旱地区饲草高粱的种收饲用模式. 第七届(2017)中国苜蓿发展大会论文集. 兰州:中国畜牧业协会, 国家草产业科技创新联盟, 2017: 319-325.
[29] Vogler R K, Tesso T T, Johnson K D, et al. The effect of allelic variation on forage quality of brown midrib sorghum mutants with reduced caffeic acid omethyl transferase activity. African Journal of Biochemistry Research, 2009, 3(3): 70-76.
[30] Thorstensson E M G, Buxton D R, Cherney J H. Apparent inhibition to digestion by lignin in normal and brown midrib stems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1992, 59(2): 183-188.
[31] Bean B W, Baumhardt R L, Fti M C, et al. Comparison of sorghum classes for grain and forage yield and forage nutritive value. Field Crops Research, 2013, 142(3): 20-26.
[32] Li Y, You Y L, Zhao H M, et al. Analysis on the yield, quality and stress resistance of brown midrib forage sorghum varieties. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(4): 889-896.
李源, 游永亮, 赵海明, 等. 褐色中脉饲草高粱品种产量品质与抗逆性分析. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4): 889-896.
[33] Jeon B T, Moon S H, Lee S M.A comparative studies on the growth characteristics and feed components of sorghum×sudangrass hybrids at paddy field cultivation. Journal of The Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science, 2012, 32(1): 29-38.
[34] Aguilar P B D, Pires D A D A, Frota B C B, et al. Nutritional characteristics of BMR mutant and normal sorghum genotypes used for cutting and grazing. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences, 2014, 36(3): 259-264.
[35] He Z F, He C G, Wei Y M, et al. Biological characteristics and nutrients of the photoperiod-sensitive sorghum×sudangrass varieties in the arid land of east Gansu. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(10): 166-174.
何振富, 贺春贵, 魏玉明, 等. 光敏型高丹草在陇东旱塬的生物学特性和营养成分比较研究. 草业学报, 2015, 24(10): 166-174.
[36] Cusicanqui J A, Lauer J G.Plant density and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality. Agronomy Journal, 1999, 91(6): 911-915.
[37] Zheng Q F, Li F S, Yang H S, et al. Effect of sowing density on growth, quality and yield of Sorghum bicolour Sugargraze. Grassland and Turf, 2005, 111(4): 61-65.
郑庆福, 李凤山, 杨恒山, 等. 种植密度对杂交甜高粱“甜格雷兹”生长、品质及产量的影响. 草原与草坪, 2005, 111(4): 61-65.
[38] Liu J N, Shi Y H, Wang Y Q, et al. Growth dynamics and optimum harvest period of sorghum hybrid sudangrass. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(1): 31-37.
刘建宁, 石永红, 王运琦, 等. 高丹草生长动态及收割期的研究. 草业学报, 2011, 20(1): 31-37.
[39] Wang Y Q, Zou J Q, Zhang Z P, et al. Research on variation pattern of brix in sweet sorghum stalk for energy use. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2010, 15(5): 6-11.
王艳秋, 邹剑秋, 张志鹏, 等. 能源甜高粱茎秆节间锤度变化规律研究. 中国农业大学学报, 2010, 15(5): 6-11.