放牧对荒漠草原土壤和优势植物生态化学计量特征的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2018039

草业学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (12): 94-102.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018039

放牧对荒漠草原土壤和优势植物生态化学计量特征的影响

安钰¹, 安慧^{2, *}, 李生兵³

1.宁夏农林科学院荒漠化治理研究所,宁夏银川 750002;
2.宁夏大学西北土地退化与生态恢复省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地,西北退化生态系统恢复与重建教育部重点实验室,宁夏银川 750021;
3.盐池县科学技术局,宁夏盐池 751500

收稿日期:2018-01-22 修回日期:2018-05-21 出版日期:2018-12-20 发布日期:2018-12-20
通讯作者: E-mail:anhui08@163.com
作者简介:安钰（1982-），女，宁夏固原人，副研究员，博士。E-mail: anyu-02@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（31260125）和宁夏科技支撑计划项目（2015BY025）资助。

Effects of grazing on ecological stoichiometry of soil and dominant plants in desert grassland

AN Yu¹, AN Hui^{2, *}, LI Sheng-bing³

1.Institute of Desertification Control, Ningxia Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, China;
2.Breeding Base for State Key Laboratory of Land Degradation and Ecological Restoration in Northwest China, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Restoration and Reconstruction of Degraded Ecosystem in Northwest China, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750021, China;
3.Yanchi Science & Technology Bureau, Yanchi 751500, China;

Received:2018-01-22 Revised:2018-05-21 Online:2018-12-20 Published:2018-12-20
Contact: E-mail:anhui08@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以宁夏荒漠草原土壤和优势植物为研究对象,分析放牧对荒漠草原生态系统土壤和植物C、N、P化学计量学特征的影响机制。结果表明,土壤C、C∶N、C∶P随着放牧强度的增加呈下降趋势,P呈增加趋势,而N及N∶P呈先增加后下降趋势。不同优势植物N含量对放牧强度的响应存在一定的差异,中度和重度放牧区甘草、砂珍棘豆、山苦荬、牛心朴子N含量明显低于轻度和围封禁牧N含量,牛枝子、短花针茅、中亚白草、刺叶柄棘豆、虫实、猪毛菜、乳浆大戟、骆驼蓬N含量明显高于轻度和围封禁牧N含量,表明适度放牧会显著增加某些物种的N含量;13种优势植物C∶N和C∶P在不同放牧强度下均表现为与N、P的规律相反,且不同优势植物N∶P对放牧强度的响应也存在一定的分异性。优势植物P、C∶P与土壤P、C∶P呈显著正相关,而C、N、C∶N和N∶P与土壤C、N、C∶N和N∶P无显著相关性,说明植物叶片的化学计量特征并非是由土壤养分含量特征直接决定的,而更多是受植物自身遗传特性的影响,体现了荒漠草原优势植物对极端环境具有相对稳定的适应能力。

关键词: 放牧, 生态化学计量, 土壤, 荒漠草原

Abstract: To determine the effect of grazing intensity on ecological stoichiometry characteristics, we evaluated the carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) contents in soil and dominant plants in desert grassland of Ningxia under different grazing intensities. The results showed that the C content and ratios of C∶N and C∶P in soil decreased with increasing grazing intensity, while the P content increased, and the N content and N∶P ratio decreased after an initial increase. The N contents in different dominant plants showed different responses to grazing intensity. The N contents in Glycyrrhiza uralensis, Oxytropis racemosa, Ixeris chinensis, and Cynanchum komarovii were significantly lower under moderate and heavy grazing intensities than under light grazing intensity and no grazing. The N contents in Lespedeza potaninii, Stipa breviflora, Pennisetum centrasiaticum, Oxytropis aciphylla, Corispermum hyssopifolium, Salsola collina, Euphorbia esula, and Peganum harmala were significantly higher under moderate and heavy grazing intensities than under light grazing intensity and no grazing. These results indicated that an appropriate grazing intensity could significantly increase the N content of some species. The trends in C∶N and C∶P ratios in the 13 dominant plants were opposite to the trends in N and P contents under different grazing intensities, and the effect of grazing on the N∶P ratio differed among the different dominant plant species. The P content and C∶P ratio of dominant plants were significantly positively correlated with the P content and C∶P ratio of soil, but there was no correlation between the C and N contents and the C∶N and N∶P ratios in dominant plants and those in soil. These findings indicated that the stoichiometric characteristics of plants were affected by the genetic characteristics of plants, and not directly determined by soil nutrient contents. This helps to explain why dominant plants have a relatively stable ability to adapt the extreme environment in desert grassland.

Key words: grazing, ecological stoichiometry, soil, desert grassland

安钰, 安慧, 李生兵. 放牧对荒漠草原土壤和优势植物生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(12): 94-102.

AN Yu, AN Hui, LI Sheng-bing. Effects of grazing on ecological stoichiometry of soil and dominant plants in desert grassland[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(12): 94-102.

参考文献

[1] Wang S Q, Yu G R.Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of ecosystem carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus element. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947.
王绍强, 于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征. 生态学报, 2008, 28(8): 3937-3947.
[2] Yang J, Xie Y Z, Wu X D, et al. Stoichiometry characteristics of plant and soil in alfalfa grassland with different growing years. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(2): 340-345.
杨菁, 谢应忠, 吴旭东, 等. 不同种植年限人工苜蓿草地植物和土壤化学计量特征. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2): 340-345.
[3] Ma R T, Fang Y, An S S.Ecological stoichiometry of carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and C∶N∶P in shoots and litter of plants in grassland in Yunwu mountain. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2016, 53(5): 1170-1180.
马任甜, 方瑛, 安韶山. 云雾山草地植物地上部分和枯落物的碳、氮、磷生态化学计量特征. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(5): 1170-1180.
[4] Wu T G, Chen B F, Xiao Y H, et al. Leaf stoichiometry of trees in three forest types in Pearl River Delta, South China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(1): 58-63.
吴统贵, 陈步峰, 肖以华, 等. 珠江三角洲3种典型森林类型乔木叶片生态化学计量学. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 58-63.
[5] Yang K, Huang J H, Dong D, et al. Canopy leaf N and P stoichiometry in grassland communities of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(1): 17-22.
杨阔, 黄建辉, 董丹, 等. 青藏高原草地植物群落冠层叶片氮磷化学计量学分析. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 17-22.
[6] Ren S J, Yu G R, Jiang C M, et al. Stoichiometric characteristics of leaf carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus of 102 dominant species in forest ecosystems along the North-South Transect of east China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(3): 581-586.
任书杰, 于贵瑞, 姜春明, 等. 中国东部南北样带森林生态系统102种优势种叶片碳氮磷化学计量学统计特征. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(3): 581-586.
[7] Chen J Q, Zhang L L, Li J, et al. Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry of two fern species and their relationships to nutrient availability. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2014, 22(6): 567-575.
陈嘉茜, 张玲玲, 李炯, 等. 蕨类植物碳氮磷化学计量特征及其与土壤养分的关系. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2014, 22(6): 567-575.
[8] Wang S P.Grazing resistance of rangeland plants. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(3): 517-522.
汪诗平. 草原植物的放牧抗性. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(3): 517-522.
[9] Li J H, Li Z Q.Clonal morphological plasticity and biomass allocation pattern of Artemisia frigid and Potentilla acaulis under different grazing intensities. Acta Phytoecological Sinica, 2002, 26(4): 435-440.
李金花, 李镇清. 不同放牧强度下冷蒿、星毛委陵菜的形态可塑性及生物量分配格局. 植物生态学报, 2002, 26(4): 435-440.
[10] Hou F J, Yang Z Y.Effects of grazing of livestock on grassland. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(1): 244-264.
侯扶江, 杨中艺. 放牧对草地的作用. 生态学报, 2006, 26(1): 244-264.
[11] Bao Y J, Li Z H, Liu H.The effects of mowing and grazing on energy fixation and allocation of steppe community in Xilinguole, Inner Mongolia. Journal of Dalian Nationalities University, 2006, 8(1): 9-12.
鲍雅静, 李政海, 刘惠. 放牧与割草影响下羊草草原植物与群落能量固定及分配规律的比较. 大连民族学院学报, 2006, 8(1): 9-12.
[12] Zheng X X, Wang R D, Jin T T, et al. Relationships between biodiversity and biomass under different regimes of grassland use in Hulunbeir, Inner Mongolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2008, 28(11): 5392-5400.
郑晓翾, 王瑞东, 靳甜甜, 等. 呼伦贝尔草原不同草地利用方式下生物多样性与生物量的关系. 生态学报, 2008, 28(11): 5392-5400.
[13] Unkovich M, Sanford P, Pate J, et al. Effects of grazing on plant and soil nitrogen relations of pasture-crop rotations. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 1998, 49(3): 475-486.
[14] Frank D A.Ungulate and topographic control of nitrogen∶phosphorus stoichiometry in a temperate grassland: soils, plants and mineralization rates. Oikos, 2008, 117(4): 591-601.
[15] Li X Z, Chen Z Z.Influences of stocking rates on C, N, P contents in plant-soil system. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 1998, 6(2): 90-98.
李香真, 陈佐忠. 不同放牧率对草原植物与土壤C、N、P含量的影响. 草地学报, 1998, 6(2): 90-98.
[16] Zhang W Y, Fan J W, Zhong H P, et al. The nitrogen: phosphorus stoichiometry of different plant functional groups for dominant species of typical steppes in China. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(4): 503-509.
张文彦, 樊江文, 钟华平, 等. 中国典型草原优势植物功能群氮磷化学计量学特征研究. 草地学报, 2010, 18(4): 503-509.
[17] Wang X, Song N P, Yang X G, et al. The response of grassland plant diversity to soil factors under grazing disturbance. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(5): 27-36.
王兴, 宋乃平, 杨新国, 等. 放牧扰动下草地植物多样性对土壤因子的响应. 草业学报, 2013, 22(5): 27-36.
[18] Xu D M, Wang K.Characteristics of soil microbe in southern ecotone of Mu Us sandy land. Journal of Desert Research, 2007, 27(5): 805-808.
许冬梅, 王堃. 毛乌素沙地南缘生态过渡带土壤微生物特征. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(5): 805-808.
[19] Yang Y, Ha S, Sun B P, et al. Effects of different vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients in southern edge of Mu Us sandy land. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2012, 28(10): 37-42.
杨越, 哈斯, 孙保平, 等. 毛乌素沙地南缘不同植被恢复类型的土壤养分效应. 中国农学通报, 2012, 28(10): 37-42.
[20] Ren J Z.Research method of prataculture science. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1998.
任继周. 草业科学研究方法. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998.
[21] Bao S D.Analysis of soil agricultural chemistry. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2007.
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2007.
[22] Liu N, Zhang Y J.Effects of grazing on soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in typical steppe. Pratacultural Science, 2010, 27(4): 11-14.
刘楠, 张英俊. 放牧对典型草原土壤有机碳及全氮的影响. 草业科学, 2010, 27(4): 11-14.
[23] Zhang T, Weng Y, Yao F J, et al. Effect of grazing intensity on ecological stoichiometry of Deyeuxia angustifolia and meadow soil. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(2): 20-28.
张婷, 翁月, 姚凤娇, 等. 放牧强度对草甸植物小叶章及土壤化学计量比的影响. 草业学报, 2014, 23(2): 20-28.
[24] Xu S, Gong J R, Zhang Z Y, et al. The ecological stoichiometry of dominant species in different land uses type of grassland. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(6): 45-53.
徐沙, 龚吉蕊, 张梓榆, 等. 不同利用方式下草地优势植物的生态化学计量特征. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 45-53.
[25] Yang H M, Wang D M.Advances in the study on ecological stoichiometry in grass-environment system and its response to environmental factors. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(2): 244-252.
杨惠敏, 王冬梅. 草-环境系统植物碳氮磷生态化学计量学及其对环境因子的响应研究进展. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 244-252.
[26] Ding X H, Gong L, Wang D B, et al. Grazing effects on eco-stoichiometry of plant and soil in Hulunbeir, Inner Mogolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(15): 4722-4730.
丁小慧, 宫立, 王东波, 等. 放牧对呼伦贝尔草地植物和土壤生态化学计量学特征的影响. 生态学报, 2012, 32(15): 4722-4730.
[27] Koerselman W, Meuleman A F M. The vegetation N∶P ratio: A new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1996, 33(6): 1441-1450.
[28] Geng Y, Wu Y, He J S.Relationship between leaf phosphorus concentration and soil phosphorus availability across Inner Mongolia grassland. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2011, 35(1): 1-8.
耿燕, 吴漪, 贺金生. 内蒙古草地叶片磷含量与土壤有效磷的关系. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(1): 1-8.

放牧对荒漠草原土壤和优势植物生态化学计量特征的影响

Effects of grazing on ecological stoichiometry of soil and dominant plants in desert grassland

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	李静, 红梅, 闫瑾, 张宇晨, 梁志伟, 叶贺, 高海燕, 赵巴音那木拉. 短花针茅荒漠草原植被群落结构及生物量对水氮变化的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 38-48.
[2]	万芳, 蒙仲举, 党晓宏, 王瑞东, 张慧敏. 封育措施下荒漠草原针茅植物-土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 49-55.
[3]	别尔达吾列提·希哈依, 董乙强, 安沙舟, 魏鹏. 短期封育对白梭梭荒漠和盐生假木贼荒漠土壤营养成分的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 56-62.
[4]	鲍根生, 宋梅玲, 王玉琴, 尹亚丽, 王宏生. 围封和防除狼毒对狼毒斑块土壤理化性质和微生物量影响的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 63-72.
[5]	郭剑波, 赵国强, 贾书刚, 董俊夫, 陈龙, 王淑平. 施肥对高寒草原草地质量指数及土壤性质影响的综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 85-93.
[6]	吴晓娟, 杨梅, 芦奕晓, 杨惠敏. 混播比例和施氮肥对箭筈豌豆/燕麦草地根系特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 106-116.
[7]	王琇瑜, 黄晓霞, 和克俭, 孙晓能, 吕曾哲舟, 张勇, 朱湄, 曾睿钦. 滇西北高寒草甸植物群落功能性状与土壤理化性质的关系[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 6-17.
[8]	刘红梅, 张海芳, 赵建宁, 王慧, 秦洁, 杨殿林, 张乃芹. 氮添加对贝加尔针茅草原土壤活性有机碳和碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 18-26.
[9]	王洪义, 丁睿, 王智慧, 杨凤军. 氮、磷添加对草地不同冠层植物叶片和根系生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 37-45.
[10]	马千虎, 张学梅, 王自奎, 杨惠敏. 基于APSIM模型的高寒地区燕麦灌溉制度优化[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 1-10.
[11]	罗楠, 舒英格, 陈梦军, 肖盛杨. 喀斯特山区不同草地土壤结构及分形特征[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 11-22.
[12]	孙世贤, 丁勇, 李夏子, 吴新宏, 闫志坚, 尹强, 李金卓. 放牧强度季节调控对荒漠草原土壤风蚀的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 23-29.
[13]	马涛, 吕文强, 李泽霞, 陈爱华, 董彦丽. 黄土高原丘陵沟壑区轮作休耕模式下5种土地利用方式土壤剖面水分分布特征[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 30-39.
[14]	宗文贞, 郭家昊, 贾云龙, 郑永兴, 杨旭, 胡芳弟, 王静. 单宁在植物-土壤氮循环中作用的研究进展[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 174-183.
[15]	岳可欣, 龚吉蕊, 于上媛, 宝音陶格涛, 杨波, 王彪, 朱趁趁, 张子荷, 矢佳昱. 氮添加下典型草原凋落物质量和土壤酶活性对凋落物分解速率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 71-82.