不同品种青贮玉米与拉巴豆套种对青贮玉米农艺性状及产量的影响

doi:10.11686/cyxb2018569

草业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (9): 209-216.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018569

• 研究简报 • 上一篇

不同品种青贮玉米与拉巴豆套种对青贮玉米农艺性状及产量的影响

李亚娇^1**, 马培杰^1**, 吴佳海^1,2, 牟琼^1,2, 覃涛英¹, 王晓强¹, 马宁¹, 张蓉¹, 李德芳³, 朗永祥³, 吴有松³, 田应学³, 韩永芬^1,2,*

1.贵州省农业科学院草业研究所,贵州贵阳 550006;
2.贵州金农富平生态农牧科技有限公司,贵州松桃 554100;
3.松桃苗族自治县山地生态畜牧业发展中心,贵州松桃 554100

收稿日期:2018-08-30 修回日期:2019-01-28 出版日期:2019-09-20 发布日期:2019-09-20
通讯作者: *E-mail: 442694189@qq.com
作者简介:李亚娇(1989-),女,甘肃张掖人,研究实习员,硕士。E-mail: 1297385362@qq.com。马培杰(1990-),男,甘肃庆阳人,物理研究员,硕士。E-mail: 731607995@qq.com。**共同第一作者
基金资助:
贵州省科技计划项目“武陵山区牧草产业配套技术集成应用”(黔科合成果[2016]4042-1),贵州省科研机构服务企业项目“贵州牧草资源产业化开发及生态畜牧业科技支撑行动”(黔科合平台人才[2016]5713),贵州省科技计划项目“贵州山区牧草产业化生产技术研究集成与应用”黔科合重大专项字(2014)6017号)和贵州省农业科学院“农业科技改革与创新服务园区”草地生态畜牧产业项目资助

Effects of interplanting with Dolichos lablab on agronomic traits and yield of two varieties of silage maize

LI Ya-jiao^1**, MA Pei-jie^1**, WU Jia-hai^1,2, MU Qiong^1,2, QIN Tao-ying¹, WANG Xiao-qiang¹, MA Ning¹, ZHANG Rong¹, LI De-fang³, LANG Yong-xiang³, WU You-song³, TIAN Ying-xue³, HAN Yong-fen^1,2,*

1.Institute of grass industry of Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, China;
2.Guizhou Jinnongfuping Ecological Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Science and Technology Company Limited, Songtao 554100, China;
3.Development Center for Mountain Ecological Animal Husbandry of Songtao Miao Nationality Autonomous County of Guizhou Province, Songtao 554100, China

Received:2018-08-30 Revised:2019-01-28 Online:2019-09-20 Published:2019-09-20
Contact: *E-mail: 442694189@qq.com
About author:These authors contributed equally to this work.

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为寻求青贮玉米栽培中性状改良、产量升高的新途径和新技术,在贵州松桃县九江乡试验地以青贮玉米(郑青贮1号、豫青贮23)和拉巴豆为研究材料,于青贮玉米行距间套种不同行数的拉巴豆,共设3个处理玉米不套作、一行玉米+一行拉巴豆、一行玉米+两行拉巴豆,研究多行拉巴豆套种对青贮玉米农艺性状和产量的影响。结果表明,青贮玉米行间套种两行拉巴豆时青贮玉米产量最高,郑青贮1号产量达55350.00 kg·hm^-2,豫青贮23产量达75410.71 kg·hm^-2;套种一行拉巴豆时株高最高,但豫青贮23的产量、株高均优于郑青贮1号,分别高达62013.89 kg·hm^-2和298.99 cm;随着套种拉巴豆行数的增加郑青贮1号农艺性状指标叶长增大,叶宽和穗数减小,而豫青贮23的农艺性状指标变异正好相反;郑青贮1号套种两行拉巴豆时穗长最长达37.24 cm,而豫青贮23不套种拉巴豆时穗长最长达43.57 cm;变异分析中,两个青贮玉米品种产量和穗数均是变异较大,达到17%以上;套种两行拉巴豆时的郑青贮1号收入最高可达29335.50元·hm^-2,豫青贮23收入最高可达38664.76元·hm^-2,豫青贮23的经济效益要显著优于郑青贮1号。

关键词: 套种, 产量, 农艺性状, 变异, 相关关系, 青贮玉米, 拉巴豆

Abstract: This research investigated intercropping of two varieties of silage maize (‘Zheng Silage No. 1’ and ‘Yu silage 23’) with Dolichos lablab with the aim of developing new methods to improve the agronomic traits and yield of silage maize. The experiment was carried out at Jiujiang Township, Songtao County, Guizhou Province, and included three treatments: silage maize with no intercropping, alternate rows of silage maize of D. lablab, and two rows of D. lablab between each row of silage maize. The yield of silage maize was higher for ‘Yu silage 23’ than for ‘Zheng silage No.1’ in all planting regimes and for both varieties yield was highest when interplanted with two rows of D. lablab between each row of maize, (55350 and 75411 kg·ha^-1 FM for ‘Zheng silage No.1’ and ‘Yu silage 23’, respectively), and lowest for the monoculture, with the one-row D. lablab interplanting regime having intermediate yield. The plant height was highest (299 cm for ‘Yu silage 23’) when intercropping one row of D. lablab, but yield was reduced compared to two-row intercropping (62014kg·ha^-1 FM for ‘Yu silage 23’). The leaf length of the agronomic character index of ‘Zheng silage No.1’ increased with the increase in the number of D. lablab interplanting lines, the leaf width and the panicle number decreased, but the variation of the agronomic traits of ‘Yu silage 23’ was just the opposite. The panicle length of ‘Zheng silage No.1’ was 37.24 cm when interplanted with two rows of D. lablab, while that of ‘Yu silage 23’ when not interplanted with D. lablab was 43.57 cm. In variation analysis, the yield and panicle number of two silage maize varieties were larger than 17%. The maximum income from ‘Zheng silage No.1’ and ‘Yu silage 23’ was calculated as 29336and 38 665 CNY·ha^-1, respectively. Thus, the economic benefit of ‘Yu silage 23’ is significantly better than ‘Zheng silage No.1’, and interplanting with two rows of D. lablab per row of maize is recommended.

Key words: interplanting, yield, gronomic traits, variation, correlation, silage maize, Dolichos lablab

李亚娇, 马培杰, 吴佳海, 牟琼, 覃涛英, 王晓强, 马宁, 张蓉, 李德芳, 朗永祥, 吴有松, 田应学, 韩永芬. 不同品种青贮玉米与拉巴豆套种对青贮玉米农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 209-216.

LI Ya-jiao, MA Pei-jie, WU Jia-hai, MU Qiong, QIN Tao-ying, WANG Xiao-qiang, MA Ning, ZHANG Rong, LI De-fang, LANG Yong-xiang, WU You-song, TIAN Ying-xue, HAN Yong-fen. Effects of interplanting with Dolichos lablab on agronomic traits and yield of two varieties of silage maize[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(9): 209-216.

参考文献

[1] Makembe N E T, Ndlovu L R. Dolichos lablab (Lab lab purpureus cv.‘Rongai’) as supplementary feed to maize stover for indigenous female goats in Zimbabwe. Small Ruminant Research, 1996, 21(6): 31-36.
[2] Han Y Z, Zhang S X, Shi A D, et al. Nodulation effects, feeding quality and nutrient absorption of Dolichos lablab in different soils. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2012, 18(4): 965-973.
韩玉竹, 张淑霞, 时安东, 等. 拉巴豆在不同土壤上的结瘤效应、饲用品质及养分吸收研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012, 18(4): 965-973.
[3] Manimaran S, Kalyanasundaram D, Ramesh S, et al. Maximizing sugarcane yield through efficient planting methods and nutrient management practices. Sugar Tech, 2009, 11: 395-397.
[4] Zhon Z M, Zhan J, Li Z W, et al. Effects of interplanting vigna sinensis on soil water stable aggregate of Citrus reticulata orchard in purplish soil erosion region. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(12): 1940-1944.
钟珍梅, 詹杰, 李振武, 等. 紫色土侵蚀区柑橘园套种印度豇豆对土壤水稳性团聚体的影响. 草业科学, 2015, 32(12): 1940-1944.
[5] Gan L F, Zeng Z Y, Liu Y Q.Efficient cultivation technology of maize intercropping potato with plastic film. Journal of Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2008, (8): 160-166.
甘莉芳, 曾志勇, 刘艳琴. 地膜马铃薯套种玉米高产栽培技术. 广东农业科学, 2008, (8): 160-166.
[6] Li J G, Wang J H, Jiang Z R.Evaluation of economic benefits of the agro-forestry and grass-forestry system in Zhuanglang County. Science of Soil and Water Conservation, 2007, 5(4): 56-61.
李建刚, 王继和, 蒋志荣. 庄浪县林农和林草间作模式经济效益评价. 中国水土保持科学, 2007, 5(4): 56-61.
[7] Azim A, Khan A G, Nadeem M A.Influence of maize and cowpea intercropping on fodder production and characteristics of silage. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 2000, 13(6): 781-784.
[8] Jiang L F, Zhang X Q, Fu Y F, et al. Agronomic trait variation of some main orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata) cultivars in China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(3): 142-154.
蒋林峰, 张新全, 付玉凤, 等. 中国主要鸭茅品种农艺性状变异研究. 草业学报, 2015, 24(3): 142-154.
[9] Atienza S G, Satovic Z, Petersen K K.Identification of QTLs influencing agronomic traits in Miscanthus sinensis Anderss. I. total height, flag-leaf height and stem diameter. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2003, 107(1): 123-129.
[10] Liu J H, Zeng Z H, Jiao L X, et al. Intercropping of different silage maize cultivars and alfalfa. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2006, 32(1): 125-130.
刘景辉, 曾昭海, 焦立新, 等. 不同青贮玉米品种与紫花苜蓿的间作效应. 作物学报, 2006, 32(1): 125-130.
[11] Liu X Y.Effects of maize-soybean intercropping and nitrogen application on maize yield and agronomic characters. Agricultural Development and Equipment, 2017, (11): 96.
刘兴艳. 玉米-大豆间作和施氮对玉米产量及农艺性状的影响. 农业开发与装备, 2017, (11): 96.
[12] Du Y L, Zhou T, Yang H, et al. Dynamic simulation of the dry weight of soybean stems in intercropping systems. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(3): 624-634.
杜勇利, 周涛, 杨欢, 等. 玉米/大豆套作体系中大豆茎秆生长过程模拟. 草业科学, 2018, 35(3): 624-634.
[13] Zhu Y Q, Zheng W, Wang X, et al. Effects plant spacing pattern on root morphological and architectural characteristics of legume-grass mixtures. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(1): 73-85.
朱亚琼, 郑伟, 王祥, 等. 混播方式对豆禾混播草地植物根系构型特征的影响. 草业学报, 2018, 27(1): 73-85.
[14] Hou H Z, Zhang X C, Tang Y F, et al. Effects of potato-fababean intercropping on crop productivity and soil water under a plastic mulch and ridge-furrow planting system in a semiarid area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(6): 71-80.
侯慧芝, 张绪成, 汤瑛芳, 等. 半干旱区全膜覆盖垄沟种植马铃薯/蚕豆间作的产量和水分效应. 草业学报, 2016, 25(6): 71-80.
[15] Meng W W, Wang X Q, Liu J, et al. Research progress on the effects of maize-soybean intercropping on resource utilization, yield and benefit. Journal of Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 45(3): 132-135.
孟维伟, 王旭清, 刘佳, 等. 玉米大豆间作对资源利用及产量、效益影响的研究进展, 山东农业科学, 2013, 45(3): 132-135.
[16] Gou F, Zhang L Z, Dong W L, et al. Productivity of strip intercropping systems in agro-pastoral ecotone. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(6): 129-141.
苟芳, 张立祯, 董宛麟, 等. 农牧交错带不同间套作模式的土地生产力.农业工程学报, 2013, 29(6): 129-141.
[17] Wang T T, Wang Q, Wang H Z, et al. Effects of intercropping patterns on growth characteristics and yield of Angelica sinensis under continuous cropping. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(2): 54-61.
王田涛, 王琦, 王惠珍, 等. 连作条件下间作模式对当归生长特性和产量的影响. 草业学报, 2013, 22(2): 54-61.
[18] Li J, Li W Z, Wei S, et al. Study on the effect of mixture sowing on yield and quality of silage corn. Journal of Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2005, (6): 32-33.
李晶, 李伟忠, 魏湜, 等. 混播青贮玉米产量及品质性状研究. 黑龙江农业科学, 2005, (6): 32-33.
[19] Kou M K, Wang A L, Xu Z W, et al. Planting experiment of artificial mixed grassland in the alpine pastoral area. Pratacultural Science, 2003, 20(5): 6-10.
寇明科, 王安禄, 徐占文, 等. 高寒牧区当年生人工混播草地建植试验. 草业科学, 2003, 20(5): 6-10.
[20] Meng F F, Wang B, Liu B Q, et al. Comparative analysis of maize yield and main economical character under maize-soybean intercropping system. Crops, 2014, (3): 101-105.
孟凡凡, 王博, 刘宝泉, 等. 玉米-大豆带状间作下玉米品种产量和主要农艺性状比较分析. 作物杂志, 2014, (3): 101-105.
[21] Wang X W, Yang W T, Miao J Q, et al. Effects of maize-soybean intercropping and nitrogen fertilizer on yield and agronomic traits of maize. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2014, 34(18): 5275-5282.
王晓维, 杨文亭, 缪建群, 等. 玉米-大豆间作和施氮对玉米产量及农艺性状的影响. 生态学报, 2014, 34(18): 5275-5282.
[22] Li Z, Qin X Y, Li M, et al. Comparison on maize agronomic traits and yield of intercropping and monoculture. Journal of maize sciences, 2011, 19(6): 91-94.
李植, 秦向阳, 李美, 等. 间作与清种玉米农艺性状及产量的比较研究. 玉米科学, 2011, 19(6): 91-94.
[23] Tian R S, Zhang Z.Replanting silage maize the output value of each mu is doubled. Guizhou city network// http://dsb.gzdsw.com/html/2017-07/24/content_236697.htm. 2017-07-24.
田儒森, 张州. 改种青贮玉米每亩产值翻番. 贵州都市网//http://dsb.gzdsw.com/html/2017-07/24/content_236697.htm. 2017-07-24.

不同品种青贮玉米与拉巴豆套种对青贮玉米农艺性状及产量的影响

Effects of interplanting with Dolichos lablab on agronomic traits and yield of two varieties of silage maize

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	于晓波, 梁建秋, 何泽民, 周全卢, 吴海英, 张明荣. 撒播量对大豆茎秆特性和产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 117-124.
[2]	童长春, 刘晓静, 蔺芳, 于铁峰. 基于平衡施肥的紫花苜蓿光合特性及光合因子的产量效应研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 70-80.
[3]	再吐尼古丽·库尔班, 吐尔逊·吐尔洪, 涂振东, 王卉, 山其米克, 艾克拜尔·伊拉洪. 长期不同施肥处理对连作高粱生长规律及产量的影响研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 81-92.
[4]	胡月秋, 徐开未, 龙玲, 蒋帆, 周元, 邱传志, 李建兵, 陈远学. 玉米“正红6号”的密植效应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 154-162.
[5]	才璐, 王林林, 罗珠珠, 李玲玲, 牛伊宁, 蔡立群, 谢军红. 中国苜蓿产量及水分利用效率对种植年限响应的Meta分析[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 27-38.
[6]	杨叶华, 张松, 王帅, 刘正兰, 方林发, 张学良, 刘瑞, 张建伟, 张宇亭, 石孝均. 中国不同区域常见绿肥产量和养分含量特征及替代氮肥潜力评估[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 39-55.
[7]	张梨梨, 史敏, 李彦忠. 炭疽病对沙尔沁地区苜蓿产量和品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 117-126.
[8]	娄芬, 李小冬, 尚以顺, 吴佳海, 张蓉, 甘小波, 熊俊, 陈光吉, 李世歌, 裴成江. 毕节地区适宜青贮玉米品种(系)筛选及营养价值评价[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 214-224.
[9]	伏兵哲, 周燕飞, 李雪, 倪彪, 高雪芹. 宁夏引黄灌区羊草水肥耦合效应研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(5): 98-108.
[10]	周燕芝, 陈丽明, 王文霞, 李祖军, 曾勇军, 谭雪明, 胡水秀, 石庆华, 潘晓华, 曾研华. 不同直播方式与杂草防除时期对稻田杂草发生及早籼稻产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(5): 132-140.
[11]	康彩睿, 谢军红, 李玲玲, 王嘉男, 郭喜军, 彭正凯, 王进斌, Setor kwami Fudjoe, 王林林. 种植密度与施氮量对陇中旱农区玉米产量及光合特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(5): 141-149.
[12]	谢开云, 曹凯, 万江春, 王玉祥, 赵云, 朱进忠. 新疆半干旱区不同豆科/禾本科牧草混播草地生产力的变化研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 29-40.
[13]	张梦, 李本银, 刘春增, 吕玉虎, 张成兰, 陈雪青, 曹卫东. 紫云英荚果分层成熟特性及其种子产量研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(2): 64-72.
[14]	刘凯强, 刘文辉, 魏小星, 贾志锋, 石正海. 不同播量和行距对‘青燕1号’燕麦种子产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(2): 82-91.
[15]	张雪婷, 王新永, 杨文雄, 柳娜, 杨长刚. 河西绿洲灌区节水抗旱型玉米品种的评价方法探讨[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(2): 134-148.