草业学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 128-141.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2022123
• 研究论文 • 上一篇
收稿日期:
2022-03-18
修回日期:
2022-05-05
出版日期:
2023-03-20
发布日期:
2022-12-30
通讯作者:
王国华
作者简介:
E-mail: gimi123@126.com基金资助:
Wen-ting GUO1(), Guo-hua WANG1,2,3(), Qian-qian GOU1
Received:
2022-03-18
Revised:
2022-05-05
Online:
2023-03-20
Published:
2022-12-30
Contact:
Guo-hua WANG
摘要:
选取河西走廊荒漠绿洲过渡带典型藜科一年生草本植物雾冰藜、刺沙蓬和白茎盐生草为研究对象,分析不同浓度盐分(中性盐NaCl和碱性盐NaHCO3,0、50、100、150、200 mmol·L-1)对3种植物种子萌发、幼苗生长和生理特性的影响。研究结果表明:1)钠盐胁迫下,3种植物的种子萌发和幼苗生长均受到显著抑制。萌发期,种子发芽率、发芽势和发芽指数均随盐浓度增加而下降,但盐胁迫解除后,3种植物种子均可恢复萌发;幼苗生长期,植株株高、主根长和鲜重都随盐浓度增加而下降。2)3种植物生理变化显著,叶绿素含量在钠盐胁迫下呈下降趋势,而丙二醛含量呈上升趋势,游离脯氨酸和可溶性糖含量则呈先升后降趋势,其中,叶绿素含量变化是影响幼苗生长的重要因素。3)轻度(50 mmol·L-1)和中度(100、150 mmol·L-1)盐胁迫下,3种植物主要通过渗透调节来适应盐胁迫,可溶性糖和游离脯氨酸含量大幅提高,以通过细胞渗透调节提高植物持水能力,维持植物正常生长;而在重度(200 mmol·L-1)盐胁迫下,丙二醛含量迅速增加,叶绿素分解加速,渗透调节作用减弱,对植物生长的抑制作用明显。4)在个体适应策略上,3种植物通过减少根系物质分配来适应盐分胁迫,在重度盐胁迫下根冠比明显降低。5)碱性盐NaHCO3对3种植物的胁迫效应更大,同时,不同物种不同时期的耐盐性均存在显著差异,其中,白茎盐生草的耐盐性最强,雾冰藜次之,刺沙蓬最弱。
郭文婷, 王国华, 缑倩倩. 钠盐胁迫对藜科一年生草本植物种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(3): 128-141.
Wen-ting GUO, Guo-hua WANG, Qian-qian GOU. Effects of sodium salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of three Chenopodiaceae annuals[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 128-141.
图1 不同NaCl和NaHCO3浓度下3种植物的发芽率、发芽势、发芽指数和相对盐害率a~d为NaCl胁迫,e~h为NaHCO3胁迫,P<0.05表示所有物种在不同浓度盐胁迫下均差异显著,下同。a-d is NaCl stress, e-h is NaHCO3 stress, and P<0.05 indicated all species were significantly different under different salt stress concentrations, the same below.
Fig.1 Germination rate (GR), germination power (GP), germination index (GI) and relative salt injure rate of three plants under different concentrations of NaCl and NaHCO3
图2 不同NaCl和NaHCO3浓度下3种植物的复萌率不同小写字母表示同一物种在不同浓度盐胁迫下差异显著(P<0.05),下同。Different lowercase letters indicated that the same species had significant differences under different salt stress concentrations (P<0.05), the same below.
Fig.2 Re-germination rates (RGR) of three plants under different concentrations of NaCl and NaHCO3
指标 Indexes | 变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F统计量 F-statistic | 显著性水平P Significant level | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
萌发指标 Germination indexes | GR | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 3929.39 | 25.83 | <0.01 |
盐分Salt | 1 | 312.50 | 2.05 | 0.16 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 190.17 | 1.25 | 0.29 | ||
GP | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 794.89 | 4.32 | <0.05 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 1422.22 | 7.73 | <0.01 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 108.22 | 0.59 | 0.56 | ||
GI | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 80.13 | 7.80 | <0.01 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 22.45 | 2.19 | 0.14 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 8.33 | 0.81 | 0.45 | ||
RGR | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 326.06 | 5.69 | <0.01 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.94 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 159.36 | 2.78 | 0.07 | ||
生长指标 Growth indexes | H | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.55 |
盐分Salt | 1 | 13.26 | 14.95 | <0.01 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.79 | ||
M | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 0.32 | 0.24 | 0.79 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 1.77 | 1.33 | 0.25 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 2.89 | 2.17 | 0.12 | ||
T | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 2.69 | 12.15 | <0.01 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 2.60 | 11.74 | <0.01 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 0.30 | 1.34 | 0.27 | ||
生理指标 Physiological indexes | C | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 2459944.89 | 215.63 | <0.01 |
盐分Salt | 1 | 279.66 | 0.03 | 0.88 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 8629.41 | 0.76 | 0.47 | ||
S | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 0.00 | 39.99 | <0.01 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.79 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.82 | ||
F | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 0.00 | 3.18 | <0.05 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.58 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 0.00 | 1.31 | 0.28 | ||
MDA | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 0.00 | 1.46 | 0.24 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.89 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.39 |
表1 萌发指标、生长指标和生理指标的双因素方差分析
Table 1 Two-way ANOVAs at 95% for germination indexes, growth indexes and physiological indexes
指标 Indexes | 变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 Degree of freedom | 均方 Mean square | F统计量 F-statistic | 显著性水平P Significant level | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
萌发指标 Germination indexes | GR | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 3929.39 | 25.83 | <0.01 |
盐分Salt | 1 | 312.50 | 2.05 | 0.16 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 190.17 | 1.25 | 0.29 | ||
GP | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 794.89 | 4.32 | <0.05 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 1422.22 | 7.73 | <0.01 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 108.22 | 0.59 | 0.56 | ||
GI | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 80.13 | 7.80 | <0.01 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 22.45 | 2.19 | 0.14 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 8.33 | 0.81 | 0.45 | ||
RGR | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 326.06 | 5.69 | <0.01 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 0.30 | 0.01 | 0.94 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 159.36 | 2.78 | 0.07 | ||
生长指标 Growth indexes | H | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 0.54 | 0.61 | 0.55 |
盐分Salt | 1 | 13.26 | 14.95 | <0.01 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.79 | ||
M | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 0.32 | 0.24 | 0.79 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 1.77 | 1.33 | 0.25 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 2.89 | 2.17 | 0.12 | ||
T | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 2.69 | 12.15 | <0.01 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 2.60 | 11.74 | <0.01 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 0.30 | 1.34 | 0.27 | ||
生理指标 Physiological indexes | C | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 2459944.89 | 215.63 | <0.01 |
盐分Salt | 1 | 279.66 | 0.03 | 0.88 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 8629.41 | 0.76 | 0.47 | ||
S | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 0.00 | 39.99 | <0.01 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 0.00 | 0.07 | 0.79 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.82 | ||
F | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 0.00 | 3.18 | <0.05 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.58 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 0.00 | 1.31 | 0.28 | ||
MDA | 植物种Plant species | 2 | 0.00 | 1.46 | 0.24 | |
盐分Salt | 1 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.89 | ||
植物种×盐分Plant species×salt | 2 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 0.39 |
物种 Species | 指标 Indexes | NaCl胁迫 NaCl stress | NaHCO3胁迫 NaHCO3 stress | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H | M | T | H | M | T | ||
雾冰藜 B. dasyphylla | C | 0.82** | 0.70** | 0.71** | 0.64* | 0.73** | 0.62* |
S | -0.19 | -0.01 | -0.42 | -0.42 | -0.04 | -0.45 | |
F | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.03 | -0.01 | 0.23 | 0.01 | |
MDA | -0.52* | -0.64* | -0.52* | -0.60* | -0.51 | -0.55* | |
刺沙蓬 S. ruthenica | C | 0.67** | 0.56** | 0.56* | 0.65** | 0.48 | 0.72** |
S | -0.10 | 0.14 | 0.09 | -0.44 | -0.50 | -0.32 | |
F | -0.02 | 0.18 | 0.17 | -0.40 | 0.01 | -0.33 | |
MDA | -0.80** | -0.79** | -0.68** | -0.61* | -0.25 | -0.55* | |
白茎盐生草 H. arachnoideus | C | 0.46 | 0.38 | 0.74** | 0.67** | 0.60* | 0.66** |
S | -0.31 | -0.12 | -0.10 | -0.51 | -0.59* | -0.46 | |
F | -0.32 | -0.39 | -0.08 | -0.40 | -0.44 | -0.30 | |
MDA | -0.82** | -0.56* | -0.73** | -0.51 | -0.55* | -0.48 |
表2 钠盐胁迫下3种植物生长与生理指标间的相关性分析
Table 2 Correlation analysis of growth and physiological indexes of three plants under sodium salt stress
物种 Species | 指标 Indexes | NaCl胁迫 NaCl stress | NaHCO3胁迫 NaHCO3 stress | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H | M | T | H | M | T | ||
雾冰藜 B. dasyphylla | C | 0.82** | 0.70** | 0.71** | 0.64* | 0.73** | 0.62* |
S | -0.19 | -0.01 | -0.42 | -0.42 | -0.04 | -0.45 | |
F | 0.16 | 0.26 | 0.03 | -0.01 | 0.23 | 0.01 | |
MDA | -0.52* | -0.64* | -0.52* | -0.60* | -0.51 | -0.55* | |
刺沙蓬 S. ruthenica | C | 0.67** | 0.56** | 0.56* | 0.65** | 0.48 | 0.72** |
S | -0.10 | 0.14 | 0.09 | -0.44 | -0.50 | -0.32 | |
F | -0.02 | 0.18 | 0.17 | -0.40 | 0.01 | -0.33 | |
MDA | -0.80** | -0.79** | -0.68** | -0.61* | -0.25 | -0.55* | |
白茎盐生草 H. arachnoideus | C | 0.46 | 0.38 | 0.74** | 0.67** | 0.60* | 0.66** |
S | -0.31 | -0.12 | -0.10 | -0.51 | -0.59* | -0.46 | |
F | -0.32 | -0.39 | -0.08 | -0.40 | -0.44 | -0.30 | |
MDA | -0.82** | -0.56* | -0.73** | -0.51 | -0.55* | -0.48 |
指标 Indexes | NaCl胁迫 NaCl stress | NaHCO3胁迫 NaHCO3 stress | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | S | F | C | S | F | |
S | 0.42** | 0.41** | ||||
F | -0.34 | 0.08 | -0.08 | 0.06 | ||
MDA | -0.35* | -0.15 | -0.16 | -0.19 | -0.02 | 0.19 |
表3 钠盐胁迫下藜科一年生草本植物生理指标间的相关性分析
Table 3 Correlation analysis of physiological indexes of Chenopodiaceae annuals under sodium salt stress
指标 Indexes | NaCl胁迫 NaCl stress | NaHCO3胁迫 NaHCO3 stress | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C | S | F | C | S | F | |
S | 0.42** | 0.41** | ||||
F | -0.34 | 0.08 | -0.08 | 0.06 | ||
MDA | -0.35* | -0.15 | -0.16 | -0.19 | -0.02 | 0.19 |
盐分 Salt | 指标Indexes | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GR | GP | GI | H | M | T | C | S | F | MDA | |
NaCl | -0.78** | -0.79** | -0.81** | -0.91** | -0.79** | -0.75** | -0.29 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.62** |
NaHCO3 | -0.79** | -0.83** | -0.79** | -0.87** | -0.71** | -0.80** | -0.23 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.74** |
表4 盐胁迫因素与藜科一年生草本植物各项指标的相关性分析
Table 4 Correlation coefficients between salt stress factors and indicators of Chneopodiaceae annuals
盐分 Salt | 指标Indexes | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GR | GP | GI | H | M | T | C | S | F | MDA | |
NaCl | -0.78** | -0.79** | -0.81** | -0.91** | -0.79** | -0.75** | -0.29 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.62** |
NaHCO3 | -0.79** | -0.83** | -0.79** | -0.87** | -0.71** | -0.80** | -0.23 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.74** |
项目 Item | NaCl | NaHCO3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | I | II | III | |
GR | 0.89 | 0.05 | -0.01 | 0.88 | 0.09 | -0.05 |
GP | 0.91 | 0.02 | -0.11 | 0.93 | 0.01 | -0.05 |
GI | 0.90 | 0.15 | -0.18 | 0.91 | 0.06 | -0.01 |
H | 0.93 | -0.01 | -0.08 | 0.93 | -0.02 | 0.05 |
M | 0.85 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.72 | -0.27 | 0.32 |
T | 0.81 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.91 | -0.05 | 0.03 |
C | 0.38 | -0.80 | 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.76 | 0.25 |
S | 0.03 | -0.59 | 0.75 | -0.27 | 0.87 | 0.07 |
F | -0.03 | 0.61 | 0.69 | -0.23 | -0.16 | 0.91 |
MDA | -0.74 | 0.26 | 0.05 | -0.63 | -0.24 | 0.05 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 5.38 | 1.57 | 1.18 | 5.24 | 1.50 | 1.00 |
贡献率 Contribution (%) | 53.80 | 15.72 | 11.83 | 52.38 | 15.01 | 10.03 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution (%) | 53.80 | 69.52 | 81.35 | 52.38 | 67.39 | 77.42 |
表5 耐盐性评价指标的主成分分析
Table 5 Principal component analysis of salt tolerance evaluation indexes
项目 Item | NaCl | NaHCO3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | II | III | I | II | III | |
GR | 0.89 | 0.05 | -0.01 | 0.88 | 0.09 | -0.05 |
GP | 0.91 | 0.02 | -0.11 | 0.93 | 0.01 | -0.05 |
GI | 0.90 | 0.15 | -0.18 | 0.91 | 0.06 | -0.01 |
H | 0.93 | -0.01 | -0.08 | 0.93 | -0.02 | 0.05 |
M | 0.85 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.72 | -0.27 | 0.32 |
T | 0.81 | 0.34 | 0.22 | 0.91 | -0.05 | 0.03 |
C | 0.38 | -0.80 | 0.07 | 0.21 | 0.76 | 0.25 |
S | 0.03 | -0.59 | 0.75 | -0.27 | 0.87 | 0.07 |
F | -0.03 | 0.61 | 0.69 | -0.23 | -0.16 | 0.91 |
MDA | -0.74 | 0.26 | 0.05 | -0.63 | -0.24 | 0.05 |
特征值 Eigenvalue | 5.38 | 1.57 | 1.18 | 5.24 | 1.50 | 1.00 |
贡献率 Contribution (%) | 53.80 | 15.72 | 11.83 | 52.38 | 15.01 | 10.03 |
累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution (%) | 53.80 | 69.52 | 81.35 | 52.38 | 67.39 | 77.42 |
盐分 Salt | 物种Species | 指标Indexes | 平均值Average | 排序Order | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GR | GP | GI | ||||
NaCl | BD | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 2 |
SR | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 3 | |
HA | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1 | |
NaHCO3 | BD | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 2 |
SR | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 3 | |
HA | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1 |
表6 种子萌发期耐盐性指标隶属函数值及排序
Table 6 Membership function values and ranking of salt tolerance indexes in seed germination stage
盐分 Salt | 物种Species | 指标Indexes | 平均值Average | 排序Order | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GR | GP | GI | ||||
NaCl | BD | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.65 | 0.62 | 2 |
SR | 0.51 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.51 | 3 | |
HA | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.72 | 0.71 | 1 | |
NaHCO3 | BD | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.70 | 2 |
SR | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 0.49 | 3 | |
HA | 0.69 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.72 | 1 |
盐分 Salt | 物种 Species | 指标Indexes | 平均值 Average | 排序 Order | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H | M | T | C | S | F | MDA | ||||
NaCl | BD | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.65 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 1 |
SR | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 3 | |
HA | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 2 | |
NaHCO3 | BD | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.70 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 3 |
SR | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.52 | 2 | |
HA | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 1 |
表7 幼苗期耐盐性指标隶属函数值及排序
Table 7 Membership function values and ranking of salt tolerance indexes in seedling stage
盐分 Salt | 物种 Species | 指标Indexes | 平均值 Average | 排序 Order | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
H | M | T | C | S | F | MDA | ||||
NaCl | BD | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.65 | 0.44 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.39 | 0.53 | 1 |
SR | 0.52 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.59 | 0.66 | 0.40 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 3 | |
HA | 0.57 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 0.47 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 2 | |
NaHCO3 | BD | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.70 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 3 |
SR | 0.67 | 0.61 | 0.56 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.52 | 2 | |
HA | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.52 | 1 |
图5 钠盐胁迫下3种藜科一年生草本植物生长和生理关系概念框架
Fig.5 The conceptual framework of relationship between growth and physiological indexes of three Chenopodiaceae annuals under sodium salt stress
1 | Liang C Z, Wang W, Zhu Z Y, et al. The organization patterns and ecological adaptive modes of annual plant synusia in desert regions. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2002, 16(1): 77-83. |
梁存柱, 王炜, 朱宗元, 等. 荒漠区一年生植物层片的组织格局与生态适应模式. 干旱区资源与环境, 2002, 16(1): 77-83. | |
2 | Li X H, Li X L, Jiang D M, et al. Annual plant species in arid and semi-arid desert regions: A review. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2006, 25(7): 851-856. |
李雪华, 李晓兰, 蒋德明, 等. 干旱半干旱荒漠地区一年生植物研究综述. 生态学杂志, 2006, 25(7): 851-856. | |
3 | Zhang D K, Ma Q L, Liu Y J, et al. Composition and distribution characteristics of annual plant in desert area in Hexi Corridor. Pratacultural Science, 2009, 26(12): 37-41. |
张德魁, 马全林, 刘有军, 等. 河西走廊荒漠区一年生植物组成及其分布特征. 草业科学, 2009, 26(12): 37-41. | |
4 | Zhang J G, Zhang Z S, Wang X P, et al. Reproductive allocation of annual plant Eragrostis poaeoides in planted area for sand fixation in Shapotou region. Journal of Desert Research, 2005, 25(2): 60-64. |
张景光, 张志山, 王新平, 等. 沙坡头人工固沙区一年生植物小画眉草繁殖分配研究. 中国沙漠, 2005, 25(2): 60-64. | |
5 | Miller T E. Effects of emergence time on survival and growth in an early old-field plant community. Oecologia, 1987, 72(2): 272-278. |
6 | Levitt J. Responses of plants to environmental stress. New York: Academic Press, 1980: 365-434. |
7 | Luo Y Y, Zhao X Y, Huang Y X, et al. Seedling emergence of three Chenopodiaceae annuals in response to different sand burial depths and irrigation regimes. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(2): 122-129. |
罗亚勇, 赵学勇, 黄迎新, 等. 三种一年生藜科沙生植物出苗对沙埋深度和水分条件的响应. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 122-129. | |
8 | Song B, Wang G H, Gou Q Q, et al. Effects of sand-buried on annual herbaceous plants in desert-oasis ecotone of Hexi Corridor Gansu, China. Journal of Desert Research, 2021, 41(3): 185-194. |
宋冰, 王国华, 缑倩倩, 等. 沙埋对河西走廊荒漠绿洲过渡带一年生草本植物的影响. 中国沙漠, 2021, 41(3): 185-194. | |
9 | Han Z J, Cheng L, Li Z J, et al. Study on seed germination characteristics of 7 chenopodiaceae seeds in Tarim basin. Seed, 2016, 35(9): 1-5. |
韩占江, 程龙, 李志军, 等. 塔里木盆地7种藜科植物种子萌发特性的研究. 种子, 2016, 35(9): 1-5. | |
10 | Lu H Y, Zhang Y M. Response of growth and biomass allocation of Haloxylon persicum seedlings to different salt treatments. Arid Zone Research, 2012, 29(2): 194-202. |
陆海鹰, 张元明. 白梭梭幼苗生长和生物量分配对不同盐分类型和浓度的响应. 干旱区研究, 2012, 29(2): 194-202. | |
11 | Yang J N, Wang Y R. Effects of NaCl stress on seed germination of four desert plant species. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(5): 32-38. |
杨景宁, 王彦荣. NaCl胁迫对四种荒漠植物种子萌发的影响. 草业学报, 2012, 21(5): 32-38. | |
12 | Zong L, Gan L, Kang Y R, et al. Salt and drought stress effect and their interaction on germination of Lycium ruthenicum Murr. Arid Zone Research, 2015, 32(3): 499-503. |
宗莉, 甘霖, 康玉茹, 等. 盐分、干旱及其交互胁迫对黑果枸杞发芽的影响. 干旱区研究, 2015, 32(3): 499-503. | |
13 | Zhang Y F, Chen T, Fei G Q, et al. Effects of salinity on the contents of osmotica of three desert plants. Journal of Desert Research, 2007, 27(5): 787-790. |
张有福, 陈拓, 费贯清, 等. 盐度对三种荒漠植物渗透调节物质积累影响的研究. 中国沙漠, 2007, 27(5): 787-790. | |
14 | Wang L, Cai M, Lan H Y. Comparison of salt tolerance between Chenopodium album and C. glaucum. Plant Physiology Journal, 2015, 51(11): 1846-1854. |
王璐, 蔡明, 兰海燕. 藜科植物藜与灰绿藜耐盐性的比较. 植物生理学报, 2015, 51(11): 1846-1854. | |
15 | Yang X M, Li L Y. Countermeasure of ecological recovery and ecological and environmental problems in the Northwest region. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2005, 12(5): 98-100, 106. |
杨新民, 李玲燕. 西北地区生态环境存在问题与生态修复对策. 水土保持研究, 2005, 12(5): 98-100, 106. | |
16 | Su Y Z, Liu T N. Soil evolution processes following establishment of artificial sandy-fixing Haloxylon ammodendron forest. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2020, 57(1): 84-91. |
苏永中, 刘婷娜. 流动沙地建植人工固沙梭梭林的土壤演变过程. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(1): 84-91. | |
17 | Wang G H, Munson S, Yu K L, et al. Ecological effects of establishing a 40-year oasis protection system in a Northwestern China desert. Catena, 2020, 187: 1-13. |
18 | Cao G X, Liu X Q, Ji M, et al. Light response characteristics of photosynthesis of nine sandy shrubs under drought stress. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2021, 36(4): 18-25. |
曹恭祥, 刘新前, 季蒙, 等. 干旱胁迫下9种沙区适生灌木的光响应特性研究. 西北林学院学报, 2021, 36(4): 18-25. | |
19 | Wang G H, Zhao W Z. Effects of sand-burying on seed germination and seedling growth of Haloxylon ammodendron. Journal of Desert Research, 2015, 35(2): 338-344. |
王国华, 赵文智. 埋藏深度对梭梭(Haloxylon ammodendron)种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 中国沙漠, 2015, 35(2): 338-344. | |
20 | Zhao H L, Da H J Z, Li Y L, et al. Effects of human activities and climate changes on plant diversity in Horqin sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2008, 17(5): 1-8. |
赵哈林, 大黑俊哉, 李玉霖, 等. 人类放牧活动与气候变化对科尔沁沙质草地植物多样性的影响. 草业学报, 2008, 17(5): 1-8. | |
21 | Yuan J L, Zhang J G, Wang G. Structure and dynamics of herbage synusia in Shapotou planted vegetation for fixing sand dunes. Journal of Desert Research, 2002, 22(6): 101-105. |
袁建立, 张景光, 王刚. 沙坡头人工固沙区草本层片组成及其动态研究. 中国沙漠, 2002, 22(6): 101-105. | |
22 | Zhang J G, Zhou H Y, Wang X P, et al. Physio-ecological characteristics of annual plants in Shapotou region. Journal of Desert Research, 2002, 22(4): 43-46. |
张景光, 周海燕, 王新平, 等. 沙坡头地区一年生植物的生理生态特性研究. 中国沙漠, 2002, 22(4): 43-46. | |
23 | Liu Z M, Li X H, Li R P, et al. A comparative study of seed germination for 31 annual species of the Horqin steppe. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2004, 24(3): 648-653. |
刘志民, 李雪华, 李荣平, 等. 科尔沁沙地31种1年生植物萌发特性比较研究. 生态学报, 2004, 24(3): 648-653. | |
24 | Xie R, Tao Y, Chang S L. Allometric relationship between modular morphology and biomass of four annuals in the Gurbantunggut desert, China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(3): 648-655. |
谢然, 陶冶, 常顺利. 四种一年生荒漠植物构件形态与生物量间的异速生长关系. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(3): 648-655. | |
25 | Lv B, Xu Y Z, Zhao Y C. A study of bioremediation and control on inland saline soil in Hexi Corridor. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008, 28(3): 198-200. |
吕彪, 许耀照, 赵芸晨. 河西走廊内陆盐渍土生物修复与调控研究. 水土保持通报, 2008, 28(3): 198-200. | |
26 | Flowers T J, Colmer T D. Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytologist, 2008, 179(4): 945-963. |
27 | Li X, Zhao W Z. Response of various salt-alkaline mixed stresses on the photosynthetic characteristics of Bassia dasyphylla in a desert region. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2018, 38(4): 1183-1193. |
李辛, 赵文智. 荒漠区植物雾冰藜光合特性对混合盐碱胁迫的响应. 生态学报, 2018, 38(4): 1183-1193. | |
28 | Zhu J J, Xu M L, Kang H Z, et al. Effects of temperature, pH and drought stresses on ectomycorrhizal fungi growth in a Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantation on sandy land. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2005, 24(12): 1375-1379. |
朱教君, 许美玲, 康宏樟, 等. 温度、pH及干旱胁迫对沙地樟子松外生菌根菌生长影响. 生态学杂志, 2005, 24(12): 1375-1379. | |
29 | Liu X. Experimental guidance on plant physiology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2015. |
刘新. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2015. | |
30 | Zhang L X, Chang Q S, Hou X G, et al. Effects of sodium salt stress on seed germination of Prunella vulgaris. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(3): 177-186. |
张利霞, 常青山, 侯小改, 等. 不同钠盐胁迫对夏枯草种子萌发特性的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(3): 177-186. | |
31 | Lu Y M, Su C Q, Li H F. Effects of different salts stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Trifolium repens. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(4): 123-129. |
卢艳敏, 苏长青, 李会芬. 不同盐胁迫对白三叶种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 草业学报, 2013, 22(4): 123-129. | |
32 | Yuan F M, Quan Y J, Chen Z G. Effects of sodium stress on seed germination of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2018, 32(11): 182-187. |
袁飞敏, 权有娟, 陈志国. 不同钠盐胁迫对藜麦种子萌发的影响. 干旱区资源与环境, 2018, 32(11): 182-187. | |
33 | Zhang K, Tian C Y, Li C J. Review of progress of studies on salt-tolerance mechanism of annual halophytes. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2009, 33(6): 1220-1231. |
张科, 田长彦, 李春俭. 一年生盐生植物耐盐机制研究进展. 植物生态学报, 2009, 33(6): 1220-1231. | |
34 | Li H Y, Zhao K F, Wang X F. The inhibition of salinity on the germination of halophyte seeds. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition), 2002, 33(2): 170-173. |
李海云, 赵可夫, 王秀峰. 盐对盐生植物种子萌发的抑制. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 33(2): 170-173. | |
35 | Liu Z M, Jiang D M, Gao H Y, et al. Relationships between plant reproductive strategy and disturbance. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(3): 418-422. |
刘志民, 蒋德明, 高红瑛, 等. 植物生活史繁殖对策与干扰关系的研究. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(3): 418-422. | |
36 | Fu T T, Cheng H Y, Song S Q. Advances in studies of seed dormancy. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2009, 44(5): 629-641. |
付婷婷, 程红焱, 宋松泉. 种子休眠的研究进展. 植物学报, 2009, 44(5): 629-641. | |
37 | Ungar I A. Population ecology of halophyte seeds. Botanical Review, 1987, 53(3): 301-334. |
38 | Zhang J G, Wang X P, Li X R, et al. Advances and prospect of researches on desert plant life history strategies. Journal of Desert Research, 2005, 25(3): 306-314. |
张景光, 王新平, 李新荣, 等. 荒漠植物生活史对策研究进展与展望. 中国沙漠, 2005, 25(3): 306-314. | |
39 | Liu X J, Zhang X L, Qi M X, et al. Effects of complex salt and alkali conditions on seed germination and seedling chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of alfalfa. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2013, 21(3): 501-507. |
刘晓静, 张晓磊, 齐敏兴, 等. 混合盐碱对紫花苜蓿种子萌发及幼苗期叶绿素荧光特性的影响. 草地学报, 2013, 21(3): 501-507. | |
40 | Shao L H, Yu Y W, Zhang D G. The study on shrub drought resistance mechanism. Pratacultural Science, 2007, 24(3): 22-27. |
邵麟惠, 于应文, 张德罡. 灌木抗旱机理研究. 草业科学, 2007, 24(3): 22-27. | |
41 | Zhang W L, Zhu G, Huang W G, et al. Physiological response characteristics of Hedysarum multijugum, Clematis fruticosa and Buddleja alternifolia seedlings to drought in semi-arid region of Northwest China. Journal of Desert Research, 2020, 40(3): 159-167. |
张雯莉, 朱恭, 黄文广, 等. 红花岩黄芪(Hedysarum multijugum)、灌木铁线莲(Clematis fruticosa)和互叶醉鱼草(Buddleja alternifolia)幼苗适应干旱的生理特征比较. 中国沙漠, 2020, 40(3): 159-167. | |
42 | Yi L P, Wang Z W. Root system characters in growth and distribution among three littoral halophytes. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(5): 1195-1202. |
弋良朋, 王祖伟. 盐胁迫下3种滨海盐生植物的根系生长和分布. 生态学报, 2011, 31(5): 1195-1202. | |
43 | Zhang Y J, Zhao L L, Wang P C, et al. Effects of interaction between Ca2+ salt and drought stress on seed germination and seedling physiology of oats. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(5): 141-152. |
张宇君, 赵丽丽, 王普昶, 等. 盐旱交互对燕麦种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响. 草业学报, 2018, 27(5): 141-152. | |
44 | Li X. Response of annual plant Bassia dasyphylla to salt-alkaline stress. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2018. |
李辛. 一年生植物雾冰藜对盐碱胁迫的响应研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2018. | |
45 | Li C Y. Mixing effects and stress mechanisms of four major harmful salts in salt-alkaline soil on Chloris virgata. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2009. |
李长有. 盐碱地四种主要致害盐分对虎尾草胁迫作用的混合效应与机制. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2009. |
[1] | 张洁, 程凯, 王迎春. 长叶红砂钙依赖蛋白激酶RtCDPK16的非生物胁迫应答分析[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(2): 97-109. |
[2] | 孙晓梵, 张一龙, 李培英, 孙宗玖. 不同施氮量对干旱下狗牙根抗氧化酶活性及渗透调节物质含量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(6): 69-78. |
[3] | 柳福智, 张迎芳, 陈垣. 外源海藻糖对NaHCO3胁迫下甘草幼苗生长调节及总黄酮含量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(7): 148-156. |
[4] | 田甜, 王海江, 王金刚, 朱永琪, 史晓艳, 李维弟, 李文瑞玉. 盐胁迫下施加氮素对饲用油菜有机渗透调节物质积累的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(10): 125-136. |
[5] | 郭欢, 潘雅清, 包爱科. NaCl在四翅滨藜适应渗透胁迫中的作用[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 112-121. |
[6] | 李柯, 周庄煜, 李四菊, 姚浩铮, 周莹, 缪雨静, 唐晓清, 王康才. 荆芥的生长、渗透调节和抗氧化能力对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(5): 150-158. |
[7] | 贾茵, 向元芬, 王琳璐, 赵健, 刘才磊, 潘远智. 盐胁迫对小报春生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(10): 119-128. |
[8] | 曾伟航, 程碧真, 彭燕, 李州. 甘露糖浸种对干旱胁迫下白三叶种子萌发及抗旱性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(7): 112-122. |
[9] | 肖泽华, 李欣航, 潘高, 吴耀文, 杨灿鑫, 匡雪韶, 刘文胜. 锰胁迫对黄花草种子萌发及幼苗生理生化特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(12): 75-84. |
[10] | 李州, 彭燕, 尹淑霞, 韩烈保. 甘露糖对白三叶抗旱性、糖及糖醇类代谢物积累的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(12): 85-93. |
[11] | 刘建新, 欧晓彬, 王金成, 刘秀丽. 过氧化氢提高燕麦幼苗耐碱性的活性氧代谢和渗透调节[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2): 97-104. |
[12] | 宋吉轩, 吕俊, 宗学凤, 何秀娟, 徐宇, 吴潇, 王三根. 干旱胁迫下BR与N、P、K配合对羊草生长及抗旱性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(11): 171-178. |
[13] | 田礼欣, 曲丹阳, 毕文双, 谢腾龙, 李晶. 海藻糖对盐胁迫下玉米幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(8): 131-138. |
[14] | 潘高, 张合平, 刘鹏, 刘文胜. 锰胁迫对苍耳种子萌发及幼苗生理生化特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(11): 157-166. |
[15] | 宋锐, 林丽果, 王康英, 宋浩然, 蒋勇斌, 刘慧霞. 不同盐生境下硅对高羊茅生物量及生理生化特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(8): 91-97. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||