Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 5-16.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020449
Previous Articles Next Articles
Shi-qi GUAN(), Rui-tong DONG, Zeng TANG()
Received:
2020-10-13
Revised:
2020-12-07
Online:
2021-11-11
Published:
2021-11-11
Contact:
Zeng TANG
Shi-qi GUAN, Rui-tong DONG, Zeng TANG. Research into herdsmens’ decisions on livestock reduction and factors influencing their behavior, from a capital endowment perspective[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(12): 5-16.
变量 Variable | 项目 Item | 变量说明 Variable declaration | 变量定义 Variable definition | 均值 Mean | 标准差 SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
牧民的减畜行为Herders reducing livestock | 减畜行为 Reduced-livestock behavior | 是否愿意减畜Willingness to reduce livestock | 1: 愿意Willing; 0: 不愿意Unwilling | 0.6140 | 0.4880 |
减畜程度 Degree of reduction of livestock | 减畜程度Degree of reduction of livestock | 愿意减畜的比例。The percentage of willing to reduce livestock. | 0.3070 | 0.2372 | |
经济资本 (自变量) Economic capital (Independent variable) | 金融资本 Financial capital (×104 CNY) | 牧业收入The animal husbandry income | 过去一年的牧业收入(牲畜和副产品收入)。Over the past year the income of animal husbandry (livestock and by-product income). | 2.6164 | 3.6536 |
家庭贷款Household loans | 过去一年贷款的数量。Amount of loans in the past year. | 2.9628 | 5.4403 | ||
政府补贴Government subsidies | 草原生态方面的补贴。Grassland ecological subsidies. | 0.5975 | 0.8204 | ||
家庭积蓄Household savings | 家庭的储蓄额。Household savings. | 3.2816 | 5.9846 | ||
牧业资本 Animal husbandry capital | 草场面积Pasture area (hm2) | 自家草场的面积。The area of their own pasture. | 364.0582 | 11.1097 | |
牲畜数量The number of livestock(折算为羊单位Converted into sheep units) | 过去一年家庭养殖牲畜数量Number of household livestock raised in the past year: 1, ≤100; 2, 100~200; 3, 200~300; 4, 300~400; 5, >400. | 2.3932 | 1.2976 | ||
固定资产Fixed assets (×104 CNY) | 农机等设备的折现总价值。Discounted total value of agricultural machinery and other equipment. | 1.3330 | 2.4724 | ||
房产价值The value of real estate owned (×104 CNY) | 拥有的房产以现在的折算总价值。The current converted total value of real estate owned. | 29.2554 | 28.3099 | ||
文化资本(自变量) Cultural capital (Independent variable) | 教育文化Education culture | 文化程度Level of education | 受访者教育程度Education level of interviewees: 1, 小学以下Primary school level or below; 2, 小学Primary school; 3, 初中Junior high school; 4, 高中及以上Senior high school or above. | 1.3860 | 0.6074 |
传统文化Traditional culture | 户口类型Type of household | 1: 牧业户口Animal husbandry registered permanent residence; 0: 非牧业户口Non-animal husbandry account. | 0.6558 | 0.4762 | |
技术文化Technology culture | 技术培训Technical training | 是否受过技术培训Whether technically trained: 1, 有受过技术培训Technically trained; 0, 没有技术培训No technical training. | 0.1349 | 0.3424 | |
社会资本 (自变量) Social capital (Independent variable) | 社会信任 Social trust | 制度信任Institutional trust | 对村干部的信任程度:1~20分由低到高打分。The level of trust in village officials: 1-20 points from low to high. | 8.5093 | 1.6466 |
社会网络 Social network | 人际网络Social network | 过去一年家庭成员参加宗教等集体活动的次数The number of times family members participated in religious and other collective activities in the past year: 1, 0; 2, 1~5; 3, 5~10; 4, 10~20; 5, >20. | 3.0493 | 1.2537 | |
组织网络Interpersonal network (km) | 离最近的公路的距离。Distance to the nearest road. | 12.6248 | 53.6984 | ||
社会规范 Social norms | 制度约束Moral restraint | 本人遵守村规民约的程度The degree of complying with the village rules and regulations: 1, 基本不遵守Basically not complying; 2, 有时遵守Sometimes complying; 3, 都遵守All complying. | 2.9349 | 0.2987 | |
控制变量 Control variable | 扩大养殖规模Expand the scale of breeding | 是否有扩大牲畜养殖规模的想法Whether there is any idea of expanding the scale of livestock production: 1, 有Yes; 0, 无No. | 0.2523 | 0.4354 | |
饲草料成本Forage cost (×104 CNY) | 牧户家庭的饲草料成本。Forage cost of herdsman family. | 0.3504 | 1.1203 |
Table 1 Variables’ meaning and description
变量 Variable | 项目 Item | 变量说明 Variable declaration | 变量定义 Variable definition | 均值 Mean | 标准差 SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
牧民的减畜行为Herders reducing livestock | 减畜行为 Reduced-livestock behavior | 是否愿意减畜Willingness to reduce livestock | 1: 愿意Willing; 0: 不愿意Unwilling | 0.6140 | 0.4880 |
减畜程度 Degree of reduction of livestock | 减畜程度Degree of reduction of livestock | 愿意减畜的比例。The percentage of willing to reduce livestock. | 0.3070 | 0.2372 | |
经济资本 (自变量) Economic capital (Independent variable) | 金融资本 Financial capital (×104 CNY) | 牧业收入The animal husbandry income | 过去一年的牧业收入(牲畜和副产品收入)。Over the past year the income of animal husbandry (livestock and by-product income). | 2.6164 | 3.6536 |
家庭贷款Household loans | 过去一年贷款的数量。Amount of loans in the past year. | 2.9628 | 5.4403 | ||
政府补贴Government subsidies | 草原生态方面的补贴。Grassland ecological subsidies. | 0.5975 | 0.8204 | ||
家庭积蓄Household savings | 家庭的储蓄额。Household savings. | 3.2816 | 5.9846 | ||
牧业资本 Animal husbandry capital | 草场面积Pasture area (hm2) | 自家草场的面积。The area of their own pasture. | 364.0582 | 11.1097 | |
牲畜数量The number of livestock(折算为羊单位Converted into sheep units) | 过去一年家庭养殖牲畜数量Number of household livestock raised in the past year: 1, ≤100; 2, 100~200; 3, 200~300; 4, 300~400; 5, >400. | 2.3932 | 1.2976 | ||
固定资产Fixed assets (×104 CNY) | 农机等设备的折现总价值。Discounted total value of agricultural machinery and other equipment. | 1.3330 | 2.4724 | ||
房产价值The value of real estate owned (×104 CNY) | 拥有的房产以现在的折算总价值。The current converted total value of real estate owned. | 29.2554 | 28.3099 | ||
文化资本(自变量) Cultural capital (Independent variable) | 教育文化Education culture | 文化程度Level of education | 受访者教育程度Education level of interviewees: 1, 小学以下Primary school level or below; 2, 小学Primary school; 3, 初中Junior high school; 4, 高中及以上Senior high school or above. | 1.3860 | 0.6074 |
传统文化Traditional culture | 户口类型Type of household | 1: 牧业户口Animal husbandry registered permanent residence; 0: 非牧业户口Non-animal husbandry account. | 0.6558 | 0.4762 | |
技术文化Technology culture | 技术培训Technical training | 是否受过技术培训Whether technically trained: 1, 有受过技术培训Technically trained; 0, 没有技术培训No technical training. | 0.1349 | 0.3424 | |
社会资本 (自变量) Social capital (Independent variable) | 社会信任 Social trust | 制度信任Institutional trust | 对村干部的信任程度:1~20分由低到高打分。The level of trust in village officials: 1-20 points from low to high. | 8.5093 | 1.6466 |
社会网络 Social network | 人际网络Social network | 过去一年家庭成员参加宗教等集体活动的次数The number of times family members participated in religious and other collective activities in the past year: 1, 0; 2, 1~5; 3, 5~10; 4, 10~20; 5, >20. | 3.0493 | 1.2537 | |
组织网络Interpersonal network (km) | 离最近的公路的距离。Distance to the nearest road. | 12.6248 | 53.6984 | ||
社会规范 Social norms | 制度约束Moral restraint | 本人遵守村规民约的程度The degree of complying with the village rules and regulations: 1, 基本不遵守Basically not complying; 2, 有时遵守Sometimes complying; 3, 都遵守All complying. | 2.9349 | 0.2987 | |
控制变量 Control variable | 扩大养殖规模Expand the scale of breeding | 是否有扩大牲畜养殖规模的想法Whether there is any idea of expanding the scale of livestock production: 1, 有Yes; 0, 无No. | 0.2523 | 0.4354 | |
饲草料成本Forage cost (×104 CNY) | 牧户家庭的饲草料成本。Forage cost of herdsman family. | 0.3504 | 1.1203 |
变量 Variable | 分类 Classification | 比例 Percentage (%) | 变量 Variable | 分类 Classification | 比例 Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄Age | ≤30 | 0.05 | 草场面积 Pasture area (hm2) | ≤67 | 21.08 |
30~40 | 10.69 | 67~200 | 23.53 | ||
40~50 | 27.45 | 200~333 | 19.61 | ||
50~60 | 26.04 | 333~533 | 19.60 | ||
>60 | 29.77 | ≥533 | 16.18 | ||
家庭人口 Family size | 1~2 | 8.84 | 牲畜数量 Number of livestock (羊单位Sheep unit) | ≤100 | 31.55 |
3~5 | 38.14 | 100~300 | 47.58 | ||
5~8 | 38.14 | 300~400 | 11.16 | ||
>8 | 14.88 | >400 | 9.71 | ||
教育年限 Years of education (a) | 0 | 66.05 | 减畜程度 Degree of reduction of livestock | ≤0.1 | 32.09 |
1~6 | 29.76 | 0.1~0.3 | 35.07 | ||
6~9 | 3.26 | 0.3~0.5 | 16.42 | ||
>9 | 0.93 | >0.5 | 16.42 |
Table 2 The basic characteristic of the samples
变量 Variable | 分类 Classification | 比例 Percentage (%) | 变量 Variable | 分类 Classification | 比例 Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
年龄Age | ≤30 | 0.05 | 草场面积 Pasture area (hm2) | ≤67 | 21.08 |
30~40 | 10.69 | 67~200 | 23.53 | ||
40~50 | 27.45 | 200~333 | 19.61 | ||
50~60 | 26.04 | 333~533 | 19.60 | ||
>60 | 29.77 | ≥533 | 16.18 | ||
家庭人口 Family size | 1~2 | 8.84 | 牲畜数量 Number of livestock (羊单位Sheep unit) | ≤100 | 31.55 |
3~5 | 38.14 | 100~300 | 47.58 | ||
5~8 | 38.14 | 300~400 | 11.16 | ||
>8 | 14.88 | >400 | 9.71 | ||
教育年限 Years of education (a) | 0 | 66.05 | 减畜程度 Degree of reduction of livestock | ≤0.1 | 32.09 |
1~6 | 29.76 | 0.1~0.3 | 35.07 | ||
6~9 | 3.26 | 0.3~0.5 | 16.42 | ||
>9 | 0.93 | >0.5 | 16.42 |
变量Variable | 方差膨胀因子Variance inflation factor (VIF) | 方差膨胀因子的倒数1/VIF |
---|---|---|
牲畜数量The number of livestock | 1.6800 | 0.5951 |
户口类型Type of household | 1.5900 | 0.6299 |
牧业收入The animal husbandry income | 1.5000 | 0.6657 |
人际网络Social network | 1.3600 | 0.7328 |
组织网络Interpersonal network | 1.3400 | 0.7472 |
教育程度Level of education | 1.3200 | 0.7551 |
家庭贷款Household loans | 1.2800 | 0.7801 |
固定资产Fixed assets | 1.2700 | 0.7862 |
政策补贴Government subsidies | 1.2700 | 0.7869 |
饲草料成本Forage cost | 1.2100 | 0.8286 |
制度信任Institutional trust | 1.2000 | 0.8316 |
扩大养殖规模Expand the scale of breeding | 1.2000 | 0.8327 |
房产价值The value of real estate owned | 1.1800 | 0.8467 |
草场面积Pasture area | 1.1400 | 0.8734 |
制度约束Institutional constraints | 1.1200 | 0.8932 |
技术培训Technical training | 1.1100 | 0.9004 |
家庭储蓄额Household savings | 1.1000 | 0.9112 |
方差膨胀因子均值Mean VIF | 1.2900 |
Table 3 Results of multicollinearity diagnostic
变量Variable | 方差膨胀因子Variance inflation factor (VIF) | 方差膨胀因子的倒数1/VIF |
---|---|---|
牲畜数量The number of livestock | 1.6800 | 0.5951 |
户口类型Type of household | 1.5900 | 0.6299 |
牧业收入The animal husbandry income | 1.5000 | 0.6657 |
人际网络Social network | 1.3600 | 0.7328 |
组织网络Interpersonal network | 1.3400 | 0.7472 |
教育程度Level of education | 1.3200 | 0.7551 |
家庭贷款Household loans | 1.2800 | 0.7801 |
固定资产Fixed assets | 1.2700 | 0.7862 |
政策补贴Government subsidies | 1.2700 | 0.7869 |
饲草料成本Forage cost | 1.2100 | 0.8286 |
制度信任Institutional trust | 1.2000 | 0.8316 |
扩大养殖规模Expand the scale of breeding | 1.2000 | 0.8327 |
房产价值The value of real estate owned | 1.1800 | 0.8467 |
草场面积Pasture area | 1.1400 | 0.8734 |
制度约束Institutional constraints | 1.1200 | 0.8932 |
技术培训Technical training | 1.1100 | 0.9004 |
家庭储蓄额Household savings | 1.1000 | 0.9112 |
方差膨胀因子均值Mean VIF | 1.2900 |
生计资本 Livelihood capital | 分类 Classification | 变量 Variable | 减畜意愿 Willingness to reduce livestock | 减畜程度 Degree of reduction of livestock | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
系数 Coefficient | 标准误 SE | 边际效应 Marginal effect | 系数 Coefficient | 标准误 SE | |||
经济资本 Economic capital | 金融资本 Financial capital | 牧业收入The animal husbandry income | 0.1155*** | 0.0426 | 0.0340 | 0.0013 | 0.0060 |
家庭贷款Household loans | -0.0490** | 0.0203 | -0.0144 | -0.0079** | 0.0034 | ||
政府补贴Government subsidies | -0.2778** | 0.1329 | -0.0817 | 0.0246 | 0.0423 | ||
家庭储蓄Household savings | -0.0285 | 0.0189 | -0.0084 | -0.0059* | 0.0033 | ||
牧业资本 Animal husbandry capital | 草场面积Pasture area | 0.0088 | 0.0103 | 0.0026 | 0.0002 | 0.0011 | |
牲畜数量The number of livestock | -0.2121** | 0.1002 | -0.0624 | -0.0068 | 0.0201 | ||
固定资产Fixed assets | -0.0521 | 0.0435 | -0.0153 | -0.0141* | 0.0083 | ||
房产价值The value of real estate owned | 0.0099** | 0.0049 | 0.0029 | -0.0012 | 0.0008 | ||
文化资本 Cultural capital | 教育文化Education culture | 文化程度Level of education | 0.3569* | 0.1969 | 0.1050 | -0.0123 | 0.0373 |
传统文化Traditional culture | 户口类型Type of household | 0.1895 | 0.2584 | 0.0558 | 0.0881 | 0.0535 | |
技术文化Technology culture | 技术培训Technical training | -0.0675 | 0.3113 | -0.0199 | 0.0325 | 0.0487 | |
社会资本 Social capital | 社会信任Social trust | 制度信任Institutional trust | 0.2093*** | 0.0729 | 0.0616 | -0.0077 | 0.0229 |
社会网络 Social network | 人际网络Social network | 0.3630*** | 0.1019 | 0.1068 | -0.0065 | 0.0220 | |
组织网络Interpersonal network | -0.0105** | 0.0051 | -0.0031 | 0.0015 | 0.0024 | ||
社会规范Social norms | 道德约束Moral restraint | 0.0869 | 0.3665 | 0.0256 | -0.1156*** | 0.0434 | |
控制变量Control variable | 扩大养殖量Expand the scale of breeding | -0.5302** | 0.2658 | -0.1559 | -0.0596 | 0.0590 | |
饲草料成本Forage cost | -0.2746* | 0.1530 | -0.0808 | -0.0014 | 0.0527 | ||
常数项Constant term | -2.6980 | 0.7734** | 0.2963 | ||||
对数似然函数值Log likelihood | -95.243919 | ||||||
卡方检验统计量LR chi2 (18) | 57.93 | ||||||
Prob>chi2 | 0.0000 | ||||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.2332 |
Table 4 The double-hurdle mode of herdsmen’s willingness to reduce livestock
生计资本 Livelihood capital | 分类 Classification | 变量 Variable | 减畜意愿 Willingness to reduce livestock | 减畜程度 Degree of reduction of livestock | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
系数 Coefficient | 标准误 SE | 边际效应 Marginal effect | 系数 Coefficient | 标准误 SE | |||
经济资本 Economic capital | 金融资本 Financial capital | 牧业收入The animal husbandry income | 0.1155*** | 0.0426 | 0.0340 | 0.0013 | 0.0060 |
家庭贷款Household loans | -0.0490** | 0.0203 | -0.0144 | -0.0079** | 0.0034 | ||
政府补贴Government subsidies | -0.2778** | 0.1329 | -0.0817 | 0.0246 | 0.0423 | ||
家庭储蓄Household savings | -0.0285 | 0.0189 | -0.0084 | -0.0059* | 0.0033 | ||
牧业资本 Animal husbandry capital | 草场面积Pasture area | 0.0088 | 0.0103 | 0.0026 | 0.0002 | 0.0011 | |
牲畜数量The number of livestock | -0.2121** | 0.1002 | -0.0624 | -0.0068 | 0.0201 | ||
固定资产Fixed assets | -0.0521 | 0.0435 | -0.0153 | -0.0141* | 0.0083 | ||
房产价值The value of real estate owned | 0.0099** | 0.0049 | 0.0029 | -0.0012 | 0.0008 | ||
文化资本 Cultural capital | 教育文化Education culture | 文化程度Level of education | 0.3569* | 0.1969 | 0.1050 | -0.0123 | 0.0373 |
传统文化Traditional culture | 户口类型Type of household | 0.1895 | 0.2584 | 0.0558 | 0.0881 | 0.0535 | |
技术文化Technology culture | 技术培训Technical training | -0.0675 | 0.3113 | -0.0199 | 0.0325 | 0.0487 | |
社会资本 Social capital | 社会信任Social trust | 制度信任Institutional trust | 0.2093*** | 0.0729 | 0.0616 | -0.0077 | 0.0229 |
社会网络 Social network | 人际网络Social network | 0.3630*** | 0.1019 | 0.1068 | -0.0065 | 0.0220 | |
组织网络Interpersonal network | -0.0105** | 0.0051 | -0.0031 | 0.0015 | 0.0024 | ||
社会规范Social norms | 道德约束Moral restraint | 0.0869 | 0.3665 | 0.0256 | -0.1156*** | 0.0434 | |
控制变量Control variable | 扩大养殖量Expand the scale of breeding | -0.5302** | 0.2658 | -0.1559 | -0.0596 | 0.0590 | |
饲草料成本Forage cost | -0.2746* | 0.1530 | -0.0808 | -0.0014 | 0.0527 | ||
常数项Constant term | -2.6980 | 0.7734** | 0.2963 | ||||
对数似然函数值Log likelihood | -95.243919 | ||||||
卡方检验统计量LR chi2 (18) | 57.93 | ||||||
Prob>chi2 | 0.0000 | ||||||
Pseudo R2 | 0.2332 |
1 | Akiryama T, Kawamura K. Grassland degradation in China: Methods of monitoring, management and restoration. Grassland Science, 2007, 53(1): 1-17. |
2 | Hua L, Squires V R. Managing China’s pastoral lands: Current problems and future prospects. Land Use Policy, 2015, 43: 129-137. |
3 | Tang L, Dong S, Sheman R, et al. Changes in vegetation composition and plant diversity with rangeland degradation in the alpine region of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. The Rangeland Journal, 2015, 37(1): 107-115. |
4 | Wen L, Dong S, Li Y, et al. Effect of degradation intensity on grassland ecosystem services in the alpine region of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. PLoS One, 2013, 8(3): e58432. |
5 | Cao S, Wang X, Song Y, et al. Impacts of the natural forest conservation program on the livelihoods of residents of Northwestern China: Perceptions of residents affected by the program. Ecological Economics, 2010, 69(7): 1454-1462. |
6 | Reynolds S G, Batello C, Batello C, et al. Grassland and forage to improve livelihoods and reduce poverty. Grassland: A Global Resource. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2005: 323-338. |
7 | Ding C X, Yang X X, Dong Q M. Effects of grazing patterns on vegetation, soil and microbial community in alpine grassland of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(1): 159-169. |
丁成翔, 杨晓霞, 董全民. 青藏高原高寒草原放牧方式对植被、土壤及微生物群落的影响. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 159-169. | |
8 | Yan L, Zhou G, Zhang F. Effects of different grazing intensities on grassland production in China: A meta-analysis. PLoS One, 2013, 8(12): e81466. |
9 | Zhou S Q, Zhao K. How does the grassland ecological compensation policy affect farmers and herdsmen’s behavior of reducing livestock: An analysis based on the regulatory effect of non-agricultural and pastoral employment. Issues in Agricultural Economy, 2019(11): 108-121. |
周升强, 赵凯. 草原生态补奖政策对农牧户减畜行为的影响——基于非农牧就业调解效应的分析. 农业经济问题, 2019(11): 108-121. | |
10 | Hu Y N. Impacts of the grassland ecological compensation policy on household livestock production and grassland condition: An empirical study in Inner Mongolia. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019. |
胡远宁. 草原生态补奖政策对牧户畜牧养殖和草地的影响. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019. | |
11 | Xie X X, Li X P, Zhao M J, et al. How does capital endowment affect herdsman to reduce livestock-An empirical analysis based on 372 herdsmen in Inner Mongolia. Resources Science, 2018, 40(9): 1730-1741. |
谢先雄, 李晓平, 赵敏娟, 等. 资本禀赋如何影响牧民减畜-基于内蒙古372户牧民的实证考察. 资源科学, 2018, 40(9): 1730-1741. | |
12 | Wei H L, Qi Y J. Differential analysis of herdsmen of different size scales and main contributors to grassland overgrazing-A case study in Mauqu, Gansu Province. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(4): 892-901. |
韦惠兰, 祁应军. 不同规模草地超载主体的差异性—以甘肃省玛曲县为例. 草业科学, 2017, 34(4): 892-901. | |
13 | Zhang Q. Analysis of the economic incentive effect of the grassland ecological subsidy reward mechanism. Gansu Social Sciences, 2016(5): 234-238. |
张倩. 草原生态补助奖励机制的经济激励效果分析. 甘肃社会科学, 2016(5): 234-238. | |
14 | Ye H, Zhu L Z. Analysis on Inner Mongolia grassland ecological compensation practices. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(8): 1587-1596. |
叶晗, 朱立志. 内蒙古牧区草地生态补偿实践评析. 草业科学, 2014, 31(8): 1587-1596. | |
15 | Cary J W, Wilkinson R L. Perceived profitability and farmers conservation behaviour. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1997, 48(1/2/3): 13-21. |
16 | Van Herzele A, Gobin A, Van Gossum P, et al. Effort for money? Farmers’ rationale for participation in agri-environment measures with different implementation complexity. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 131: 110-120. |
17 | Wang G X, Wang Y B, Li Y S, et al. Influences of alpine ecosystem responses to climatic change on soil properties on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Catena, 2007, 70(3): 506-514. |
18 | State Council. Several opinions on promoting the sound and rapid development of pastoral areas. Practice (Ideological and Theoretical Edition), 2011(10): 4-8. |
国务院. 关于促进牧区又好又快发展的若干意见. 实践(思想理论版), 2011(10): 4-8. | |
19 | Xinhua News Agency. Xi Jinping sent a letter to congratulate the start of the second comprehensive scientific investigation and study of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. People’s Daily, 2017-08-20. |
新华社. 习近平致信祝贺第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究启动. 人民日报, 2017-08-20. | |
20 | Yao T D, Chen F H, Cui P, et al. From Tibetan Plateau to third pole and pan-third pole. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2017, 32(9): 924-931. |
姚檀栋, 陈发虎, 崔鹏, 等. 从青藏高原到第三极和泛第三极. 中国科学院院刊, 2017, 32(9): 924-931. | |
21 | Zhao W J, Yang S L, Wang X. The relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategy based on logistic regression model in Xinping County of Yuanjiang dry-hot valley. Resources Science, 2016, 38(1): 136-143. |
赵文娟, 杨世龙, 王潇. 基于Logistic回归模型的生计资本与生计策略研究—以云南新平县干热河谷傣族地区为例. 资源科学, 2016, 38(1): 136-143. | |
22 | Li X Y, Dong Q, Rao X L, et al. Farmers’ vulnerability analysis method and its localized application. Chinese Rural Economy, 2007(4): 32-39. |
李小云, 董强, 饶小龙, 等. 农户脆弱性分析方法及其本土化应用. 中国农村经济, 2007(4): 32-39. | |
23 | Bhandari P B. Rural livelihood change? Household capital, community resources and livelihood transition. Journal of Rural Studies, 2013, 32: 126-136. |
24 | Walelign S Z. Livelihood strategies, environmental dependency and rural poverty: The case of two villages in rural Mozambique. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2016, 18(2): 593-613. |
25 | Bourdieu P, Kant H. Practice and reflection of sociology guidance. Beijing: Central Compilation and Translation Press, 2004. |
皮埃尔•布迪厄, 华康德. 实践与反思: 反思社会学导论引. 北京: 中央编译出版社, 2004. | |
26 | Xiong C J, Yao J, Zhao X H. Why does capital endowment affect herders’ willingness to retreat from grazing-Based on the investigation of herdsmen at the Tianchi World Natural Heritage Site. Rural Economy, 2019(9): 116-123. |
熊长江, 姚娟, 赵向豪. 资本禀赋何以影响牧民的退牧受偿意愿-基于天山天池世界自然遗产地牧民的考察. 农村经济, 2019(9): 116-123. | |
27 | Bourdieu P. The forms of capital//Richardson J G. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. New York: Greenwood Press, 1986. |
28 | Zhang J, Zhang H M. Ningxia global tourism attraction system construction from the perspective of cultural capital. Journal of North Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Science), 2019(3): 116-122. |
张骏, 张红梅. 文化资本视域下宁夏全域旅游吸引力体系构建研究. 北方民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019(3): 116-122. | |
29 | Jin Q. Cultural capital and political participation: An empirical analysis of the Shanghai social quality survey data. Sociological Studies, 2012, 27(4): 84-104, 243. |
金桥. 上海居民文化资本与政治参与-基于上海社会质量调查数据的分析. 社会学研究, 2012, 27(4): 84-104, 243. | |
30 | Guo Z L. An analysis of the degree, motivation and social effect of political participation of villagers in contemporary China. Sociological Studies, 2003(3): 77-86. |
郭正林. 当代中国农民政治参与的程度、动机及社会效应. 社会学研究, 2003(3): 77-86. | |
31 | Bao S F. Investigation on the public environmental consciousness and actions and the impact factors in Chongqing municipality. Chongqing: Chongqing Normal University, 2008. |
包守峰. 重庆市公众环境意识和环境行为现状调查及影响因素分析. 重庆: 重庆师范大学, 2008. | |
32 | Xi Y. Discussion on the significance of ecological environment protection of nomadic culture in Inner Mongolia autonomous region. Modern Business Trade Industry, 2019, 40(24): 20-21. |
习羽. 内蒙古自治区游牧文化生态环境保护意义探讨. 现代商贸工业, 2019, 40(24): 20-21. | |
33 | Hu Z Y, Hu H. Research on social capital and rural environmental governance model innovation. Jianghuai Tribune, 2016(6): 51-56. |
胡中应, 胡浩. 社会资本与农村环境治理模式创新研究. 江淮论坛, 2016(6): 51-56. | |
34 | Zhang C E, Li Y M, Li H. Capital endowment and farmers’ social governance participation behavior: An empirical analysis based on data of 1599 farmers in 5 provinces. China Rural Survey, 2016(1): 27-37, 50. |
张翠娥, 李跃梅, 李欢. 资本禀赋与农民社会治理参与行为-基于5省1599户农户数据的实证分析. 中国农村观察, 2016(1): 27-37, 50. | |
35 | Han H Y, Zhang Z J, Peng W H. An analysis of the influence mechanism of social capital on households’ waste separation. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 2016, 46(3): 164-179. |
韩洪云, 张志坚, 朋文欢. 社会资本对居民生活垃圾分类行为的影响机理分析. 浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2016, 46(3): 164-179. | |
36 | Cramb R A. Social capital and soil conservation: Evidence from the philippines. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2005, 49(2): 211-226. |
37 | Zhang T C, Yan T W, He K, et al. Impact of capital endowment on peasants’ willingness to invest in green production: Taking crop straw returning to the field as an example. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2017, 27(8): 78-89. |
张童朝, 颜廷武, 何可, 等. 资本禀赋对农户绿色生产投资意愿的影响-以秸秆还田为例. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2017, 27(8): 78-89. | |
38 | Wu Y H, Su R N, Xu L L, et al. Research on the relationship between livelihood capital and livelihood strategies of herdsmen: Taking Xilinhot City and Xiwuzhumuqin Banner in Inner Mongolia as examples. Journal of Agrotechnical Economics, 2017(7): 71-77. |
乌云花, 苏日娜, 许黎莉, 等. 牧民生计资本与生计策略关系研究-以内蒙古锡林浩特市和西乌珠穆沁旗为例. 农业技术经济, 2017(7): 71-77. | |
39 | Chen W N, Yan H M, Huang H Q. Living and sustainable capacity under climate change in the Xilin Gol grassland. Resources Science, 2013, 35(5): 1075-1083. |
陈伟娜, 闫慧敏, 黄河清. 气候变化压力下锡林郭勒草原牧民生计与可持续能力. 资源科学, 2013, 35(5): 1075-1083. | |
40 | Cragg J G. Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica, 1971, 39(5): 829-844. |
41 | Liu G Q. Cause of multi-collinearity and its diagnosis and treatment. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 2001(4): 607-610. |
刘国旗. 多重共线性的产生原因及其诊断处理. 合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2001(4): 607-610. | |
42 | Hu Z T, Kong D S, Wei T Y, et al. Grassland eco-compensation: Equivalent relationship between livestock reduction and compensation. Journal of Natural Resources, 2015, 30(11): 1846-1859. |
胡振通, 孔德帅, 魏同洋, 等. 草原生态补偿: 减畜和补偿的对等关系. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(11): 1846-1859. | |
43 | Ding W Q. Impact of grassland award policy on pastoral satisfaction, overgrazing behavior and livestock reduction decision-making: A case study of Inner Mongolia. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019. |
丁文强. 草原补奖政策对牧户满意度、超载行为和减畜决策的影响. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019. |
[1] | Shi-qi GUAN, Hong-wei LI, Zeng TANG. Key factors affecting herder’s income: A Meta-analysis and cumulative Meta-analysis [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 1-15. |
[2] | Qiang-qiang CHEN, Wen-juan CHEN, Ya-fei MA, Jie-yu YANG, Qing YANG. Effect of social capital on herders’ willingness to participate in grassland ecological governance——A case study of the Yellow River catchment area in Gannan autonomous prefecture [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(6): 40-53. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||