Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (7): 149-159.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2022411
Rui-jie YANG1(), Shu-qin HE1,2,3(), Shu-feng ZHOU4, Jing-yue YANG1, Yu-xian JIN1, Zi-cheng ZHENG5
Received:
2022-10-17
Revised:
2022-11-24
Online:
2023-07-20
Published:
2023-05-26
Contact:
Shu-qin HE
Rui-jie YANG, Shu-qin HE, Shu-feng ZHOU, Jing-yue YANG, Yu-xian JIN, Zi-cheng ZHENG. Root regulation of soil scourability in hybrid sorghum grass during the growing period[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(7): 149-159.
Fig.3 Dynamic variation characteristics of sediment concentration in runoff during soil scouring process at different distances in horizontal direction
生长期 Growth period | 样点编号 Sample No. | 土壤抗冲指数 Soil anti-scourability index (min·g-1) | 增强值 Enhanced value (min·g-1) | 增强率 Enhancement rate (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照区CK | 试验地Test site | ||||
幼苗期 Seedling stage | H0~15 | 39.63 | 52.15 | 12.53 | 31.61 |
H15~30 | 43.63 | 4.00 | 10.09 | ||
H30~45 | 34.64 | / | / | ||
V0~15 | 39.63 | 52.15 | 12.53 | 31.61 | |
V15~30 | 48.07 | 49.97 | 1.90 | 3.94 | |
V30~45 | 34.29 | 33.43 | / | / | |
拔节前期 Prophase of jointing stage | H0~15 | 40.90 | 81.66 | 40.76 | 99.67 |
H15~30 | 51.68 | 10.78 | 26.37 | ||
H 30~45 | 38.99 | / | / | ||
V0~15 | 40.90 | 81.66 | 40.76 | 99.67 | |
V15~30 | 48.03 | 49.13 | 1.10 | 2.29 | |
V30~45 | 32.99 | 36.74 | 3.75 | 11.37 | |
拔节后期 Late jointing stage | H0~15 | 42.05 | 56.61 | 14.56 | 34.61 |
H15~30 | 49.96 | 7.90 | 18.79 | ||
H30~45 | 44.19 | 2.13 | 5.07 | ||
V0~15 | 42.05 | 56.61 | 14.56 | 34.61 | |
V15~30 | 47.03 | 65.91 | 18.87 | 40.13 | |
V30~45 | 30.35 | 34.54 | 4.19 | 13.80 | |
抽穗成熟期 Heading and maturity stage | H0~15 | 50.65 | 192.17 | 141.52 | 279.42 |
H15~30 | 103.15 | 52.50 | 103.66 | ||
H30~45 | 98.67 | 48.02 | 94.81 | ||
V0~15 | 50.65 | 192.17 | 141.52 | 279.42 | |
V15~30 | 78.85 | 443.37 | 364.52 | 462.27 | |
V30~45 | 54.35 | 98.67 | 44.32 | 81.54 |
Table 1 Enhanced effect of soil anti-scourability during growth period
生长期 Growth period | 样点编号 Sample No. | 土壤抗冲指数 Soil anti-scourability index (min·g-1) | 增强值 Enhanced value (min·g-1) | 增强率 Enhancement rate (%) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
对照区CK | 试验地Test site | ||||
幼苗期 Seedling stage | H0~15 | 39.63 | 52.15 | 12.53 | 31.61 |
H15~30 | 43.63 | 4.00 | 10.09 | ||
H30~45 | 34.64 | / | / | ||
V0~15 | 39.63 | 52.15 | 12.53 | 31.61 | |
V15~30 | 48.07 | 49.97 | 1.90 | 3.94 | |
V30~45 | 34.29 | 33.43 | / | / | |
拔节前期 Prophase of jointing stage | H0~15 | 40.90 | 81.66 | 40.76 | 99.67 |
H15~30 | 51.68 | 10.78 | 26.37 | ||
H 30~45 | 38.99 | / | / | ||
V0~15 | 40.90 | 81.66 | 40.76 | 99.67 | |
V15~30 | 48.03 | 49.13 | 1.10 | 2.29 | |
V30~45 | 32.99 | 36.74 | 3.75 | 11.37 | |
拔节后期 Late jointing stage | H0~15 | 42.05 | 56.61 | 14.56 | 34.61 |
H15~30 | 49.96 | 7.90 | 18.79 | ||
H30~45 | 44.19 | 2.13 | 5.07 | ||
V0~15 | 42.05 | 56.61 | 14.56 | 34.61 | |
V15~30 | 47.03 | 65.91 | 18.87 | 40.13 | |
V30~45 | 30.35 | 34.54 | 4.19 | 13.80 | |
抽穗成熟期 Heading and maturity stage | H0~15 | 50.65 | 192.17 | 141.52 | 279.42 |
H15~30 | 103.15 | 52.50 | 103.66 | ||
H30~45 | 98.67 | 48.02 | 94.81 | ||
V0~15 | 50.65 | 192.17 | 141.52 | 279.42 | |
V15~30 | 78.85 | 443.37 | 364.52 | 462.27 | |
V30~45 | 54.35 | 98.67 | 44.32 | 81.54 |
方向 Direction | 生长期 Growth period | 根系长度 Root length | 根系表面积 Root surface area | 根系平均直径 Average root diameter | 根系体积 Root volume |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水平方向 Horizontal direction | 幼苗期Seedling stage | 0.160 | 0.712* | 0.474 | 0.634 |
拔节前期Prophase of jointing stage | 0.717* | 0.841* | 0.544 | 0.665 | |
拔节后期Late jointing stage | 0.602 | 0.712* | 0.847** | 0.041 | |
抽穗成熟期Heading and maturity stage | 0.511 | 0.909** | 0.846** | 0.442 | |
垂直方向 Vertical direction | 幼苗期Seedling stage | 0.814** | 0.778* | 0.895** | 0.716* |
拔节前期Prophase of jointing stage | 0.917** | 0.950** | 0.754* | 0.925** | |
拔节后期Late jointing stage | 0.358 | 0.406 | 0.487 | 0.327 | |
抽穗成熟期Heading and maturity stage | -0.158 | 0.277 | 0.086 | 0.229 |
Table 2 Pearson correlation coefficient between soil anti-scourability and root characteristic parameters during growth period
方向 Direction | 生长期 Growth period | 根系长度 Root length | 根系表面积 Root surface area | 根系平均直径 Average root diameter | 根系体积 Root volume |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
水平方向 Horizontal direction | 幼苗期Seedling stage | 0.160 | 0.712* | 0.474 | 0.634 |
拔节前期Prophase of jointing stage | 0.717* | 0.841* | 0.544 | 0.665 | |
拔节后期Late jointing stage | 0.602 | 0.712* | 0.847** | 0.041 | |
抽穗成熟期Heading and maturity stage | 0.511 | 0.909** | 0.846** | 0.442 | |
垂直方向 Vertical direction | 幼苗期Seedling stage | 0.814** | 0.778* | 0.895** | 0.716* |
拔节前期Prophase of jointing stage | 0.917** | 0.950** | 0.754* | 0.925** | |
拔节后期Late jointing stage | 0.358 | 0.406 | 0.487 | 0.327 | |
抽穗成熟期Heading and maturity stage | -0.158 | 0.277 | 0.086 | 0.229 |
1 | Yan R, Zhang X P, Yan S J, et al. Estimating soil erosion response to land use/cover change in a catchment of the Loess Plateau, China. International Soil & Water Conservation Research, 2018, DOI: 10.1016/j.iswcr.2017.12.002. |
2 | Borrelli P, Robinson D A, Fleischer L R, et al. An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion. Nature Communications, 2017, 8(1): 2013-2017. |
3 | Shi Z H, Wang L, Liu Q J, et al. Soil erosion: From comprehensive control to ecological regulation. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2018, 33(2): 198-205. |
史志华, 王玲, 刘前进, 等. 土壤侵蚀: 从综合治理到生态调控. 中国科学院院刊, 2018, 33(2): 198-205. | |
4 | Ministry of Agriculture. National agricultural sustainable development plan. China Agricultural Informatics, 2016(23): 26-33, 42. |
农业部. 农业全国农业可持续发展规划. 中国农业信息, 2016(23): 26-33, 42. | |
5 | Zhou T, Su Z A, Liu G C, et al. Effects of typical ecological restoration measures for engineering accumulation on sediment yield and hydrodynamic process. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(9): 91-100. |
周涛, 苏正安, 刘刚才, 等. 工程堆积体典型生态修复措施对土壤侵蚀水动力过程的影响. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(9): 91-100. | |
6 | Hu C H, Zhang S H, Zhang X M. Research on water and sediment regulation of the Yellow River under new situation. Strategic Study of CAE, 2022, 24(1): 122-130. |
胡春宏, 张双虎, 张晓明. 新形势下黄河水沙调控策略研究. 中国工程科学, 2022, 24(1): 122-130. | |
7 | Wang L X, Li Z W, Wang D Y, et al. Methods and measures for soil and water conservation in hilly red soil regions in south China: A case study of Xiaoyang watershed in Ningdu. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(5): 1169-1178. |
王凌霞, 李忠武, 王丹阳, 等. 红壤低山丘陵区水土流失防治分区方法与措施配置-以宁都县小洋小流域为例. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(5): 1169-1178. | |
8 | Tang K L. Soil and water conservation in China (Refined). Beijing: Science Press, 2004: 80-113. |
唐克丽. 中国水土保持(精). 北京: 科学出版社, 2004: 80-113. | |
9 | China Rural Technology Development Center. Important achievements have been made in the project of “creation and application of strong heterotic hybrids of major crops” under the “863” plan of the “12th five year” plan. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016, 18(5): 216. |
中国农业技术开发中心. “十二五”“863”计划“主要农作物强优势杂交种的创制与应用”项目取得重要成果. 中国农业科技导报, 2016, 18(5): 216. | |
10 | Guo Y F, Duan Q F, Hua S Z, et al. Standard for classification and gradation of soil erosion, SL 190-2007. Beijing: Ministry of Water Resources Department of Soil and Water Conservation, 2008. |
郭延辅, 段乔甫, 华绍祖, 等. 土壤侵蚀分类分级标准, SL 190-2007. 北京: 水利部水土保持司, 2008. | |
11 | Hou C M, Li L, Wen C T. A review of research methods and influencing factors of soil anti-scourability. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017, 688(2): 230-232, 234. |
侯春镁, 李玲, 温昌焘. 土壤抗冲性研究方法及影响因素综述. 现代农业科技, 2017, 688(2): 230-232, 234. | |
12 | Jing K. Soil erosion and environment in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2005. |
景可. 中国土壤侵蚀与环境. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005. | |
13 | Lan H Y, Duan W B, Chen L X, et al. Effects of forest type, microsite type and soil properties on soil erosion resistance. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(2): 108-114. |
兰航宇, 段文标, 陈立新, 等. 林型和微立地类型及其土壤性质对土壤抗侵蚀能力的影响. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2): 108-114. | |
14 | Liu Z, Yang R, Pei Y D. Soil erosion resistance characteristics of Zanthoxylum bungeanum and Lonicera japonica forest land in canyon areas of Kast plateau. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2019, 56(2): 466-474. |
刘志, 杨瑞, 裴仪岱. 喀斯特高原峡谷区顶坛花椒与金银花林地土壤抗侵蚀特征. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(2): 466-474. | |
15 | Jiang D S, Fan X K, Li X H, et al. Study on horizontal and vertical regulation of soil anti-scourability in area with serious soil erosion on Loess Plateau. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 1995, 9(2): 1-8. |
蒋定生, 范兴科, 李新华, 等. 黄土高原水土流失严重地区土壤抗冲性的水平和垂直变化规律研究. 水土保持学报, 1995, 9(2): 1-8. | |
16 | Zheng Z C, Zhang X Z, Li T X, et al. Characteristics and influencing factors soil anti-scourability during maize growing season. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2014, 45(9): 180-186. |
郑子成, 张锡洲, 李廷轩, 等. 玉米季土壤抗冲性变化特征及其影响因素分析. 农业机械学报, 2014, 45(9): 180-186. | |
17 | Wang J L, Wu F Q. Soil erosion resistance of sloping farmland under soybean cultivation relative to growth stage. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2016, 53(6): 1389-1398. |
王计磊, 吴发启. 不同生长期大豆坡耕地土壤抗侵蚀能力特征. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(6): 1389-1398. | |
18 | Liu X H, Chen Y, Yan Z H, et al. The effects of grass hedgerow roots on shear strength and scouring resistance of root-soil complexes in the purple soil region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(11): 98-107. |
刘枭宏, 谌芸, 颜哲豪, 等. 紫色土区草篱根系对其根-土复合体抗剪和抗冲性能的影响. 草业学报, 2021, 30(11): 98-107. | |
19 | Li Q, Yang J C, Zhang J Q, et al. Progress of research on soil erosion resistance of plant roots and future prospects. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment, 2020, 37(1): 17-23. |
李强, 杨俊诚, 张加琼, 等. 植物根系抗侵蚀指标及模型研究进展. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020, 37(1): 17-23. | |
20 | Lu P. Specification and data standard for describing sorghum germplasm resources. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2006. |
陆平. 高粱种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. | |
21 | Sha X Y, Li K, Wang W L, et al. Characteristics of soil anti-scouribility in gully head wall of grass-covering on the Gullied Loess Plateau, Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(1): 133-140. |
沙小燕, 李魁, 王文龙, 等. 黄土高塬沟壑区草地沟头立壁土壤抗冲性特征. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1): 133-140. | |
22 | Wang Y L, Xu H, Ma F, et al. Soil anti-scourability and its related physical properties on typical forestlands in loess hilly region of Southern Ningxia. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2021, 28(1): 37-43. |
王月玲, 许浩, 马璠, 等. 宁南黄土区典型林地土壤抗冲性及相关物理性质. 水土保持研究, 2021, 28(1): 37-43. | |
23 | Wang B, Li P P, Huang C H, et al. Effects of root morphological traits on soil detachment for ten herbaceous species in the Loess Plateau. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 754: 142304. |
24 | Guo Y L, Zhao Y G, Gao L Q, et al. Reduction of flow velocity by biological soil crust of revegetated grassland in the hilly Loess Plateau, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2022, 33(7): 1871-1877. |
郭雅丽, 赵允格, 高丽倩, 等. 黄土丘陵区草本植物覆盖下生物结皮对坡面径流流速的削减作用. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(7): 1871-1877. | |
25 | Jiang C, Zhang H Y, Zhao L L, et al. Unfolding the effectiveness of ecological restoration programs in combating land degradation: Achievements, causes, and implications. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 748: 141552. |
26 | Wang D D, Yuan Z J, Cai Y T, et al. Characterisation of soil erosion and overland flow on vegetation-growing slopes in fragile ecological regions: A review-ScienceDirect. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 285: 112165. |
27 | Dong B L, Li J W, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of vegetation restoration types on soil nutrients and soil erodibility regulated by slope positions on the Loess Plateau. Journal of Environmental Management, 2022, 302(Pt A): 113985. |
28 | Qu D X, Lv G, Zhai J X, et al. Effects of root system of different forest and grass measures on soil anti-scouring in southern margin of Horqin Sandy Land. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(1): 21-25. |
屈东旭, 吕刚, 翟景轩, 等. 科尔沁沙地南缘不同林草措施根系对土壤抗冲性的影响. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(1): 21-25. | |
29 | Yang Z, Huang X, She D L. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in the loess hilly region of Northwestern Shanxi. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(6): 178-184. |
杨震, 黄萱, 佘冬立. 晋西北黄土丘陵区土壤饱和导水率的空间分布特征及影响因素. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6): 178-184. | |
30 | Chen Z K, Zong Q L, Cai H B. Experimental study on the influence of typical desert vegetation roots on erosion process of Tarim River bank slope. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research, 2022, 39(1): 56-62. |
陈志康, 宗全利, 蔡杭兵. 典型荒漠植被根系对塔里木河岸坡冲刷过程影响试验研究. 长江科学院院报, 2022, 39(1): 56-62. | |
31 | Liu J M, An S Q, Liao R W, et al. Temporal variation and spatial distribution of the root system of corn in a soil profile. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17(3): 517-521. |
刘晶淼, 安顺清, 廖荣伟, 等. 玉米根系在土壤剖面中的分布研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(3): 517-521. | |
32 | Huang R D, Ma H T. Discussion on the law of root growth and development of maize and sorghum. Tillage and Cultivation, 1993(4): 21-23. |
黄瑞冬, 马鸿图. 玉米、高粱根系生长发育规律探讨. 耕作与栽培, 1993(4): 21-23. | |
33 | Li Z X, Chen Y Q, Wang Q C, et al. Influence of planting density on root spatio-temporal distribution of different types of maize under high-yielding cultivation conditions. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(7): 1286-1294. |
李宗新, 陈源泉, 王庆成, 等. 高产栽培条件下种植密度对不同类型玉米品种根系时空分布动态的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38(7): 1286-1294. |
[1] | Li-tao TANG, Rui MAO, Chang-ting WANG, Jie LI, Lei HU, Hong-biao ZI. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on root characteristics of alpine meadow [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(9): 105-116. |
[2] | Si-li LIU, Chang-ting WANG, Chang-bing ZHANG, Lei HU, Li-tao TANG, Pan PAN. A comparative study of root characteristics of three gramineous herbage species in the Northwest Sichuan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(3): 41-53. |
[3] | LIN Fang, LIU Xiao-jing, TONG Chang-chun, WU Yong. A study of root system characteristics and carbon and nitrogen metabolism of alfalfa and four grass forages in monoculture or intercropped [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(9): 45-54. |
[4] | WAN Qi-hui, MA Li-hua, JIANG Xian-jun. Root characteristics and accumulation of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium in rice plants cultivated under three different systems [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(10): 44-52. |
[5] | CAO Wei, LIU Lu-lu, WU Dan. Soil erosion changes and driving factors in the Three-River Headwaters region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(6): 10-22. |
[6] | LIN Hui-Long, ZHENG Shu-Ting, WANG Xue-Lu. Soil erosion assessment based on the RUSLE model in the Three-Rivers Headwaters area, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(7): 11-22. |
[7] | GAO Song-Juan, CAO Wei-Dong, THORUP-KRISTENSEN Kristian. Comparison of the root morphology of oilseed rape and winter wheat during the seedling period using a rhizotron tube method [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(4): 134-142. |
[8] | LIU Xiao-Jing, YE Fang, ZHANG Xiao-Ling. Effects of exogenous nitrogen forms on root characteristics of alfalfa at different growth stages [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(6): 53-63. |
[9] | YU Xiao-Jun, JING Yuan-Yuan, XU Chang-Lin, SHI Shang-Li, ZHANG Jian-Wen, CHEN Lu-Jun, YANG Hai-Lei, XIAO Hong. Effects of film mulching on growth and crown and root characteristics of alfalfa in an alpine meadow [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(6): 43-52. |
[10] | ZHANG Xuefeng, NIU Jianming, ZHANG Qing, DONG Jianjun, ZHANG Jing. Soil conservation function and its spatial distribution of grassland ecosystems in Xilin River Basin, Inner Mongolia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(1): 12-20. |
[11] | NAN Li-li, SHI Shang-li, ZHANG Jian-hua. Study on root system development ability of different root-type alfalfa [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(2): 117-124. |
[12] | ZHAO Cai, ZHOU Hai-yan, CHAI Qiang, HUANG Gao-bao, LIU Hui-juan, ZHU Jing. Effects of eugenol and intercropped faba-bean on wheat root growth under different water supply conditions [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(2): 133-139. |
[13] | JIAO Ju-ying, WANG Ning, DU Hua-dong, WANG Dong-li. Research on effects of soil erosion on vegetation development and succession of plant resistance to erosion [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(5): 311-318. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||