Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 81-95.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020067
Previous Articles Next Articles
Jia-meng GUO(), Ling-zhi HE, Dong-liang YAN, Zhuo LI, Yong-chao WANG, Rui-xin SHAO, Qing-hua YANG()
Received:
2020-02-21
Revised:
2020-04-26
Online:
2021-01-20
Published:
2021-01-08
Contact:
Qing-hua YANG
Jia-meng GUO, Ling-zhi HE, Dong-liang YAN, Zhuo LI, Yong-chao WANG, Rui-xin SHAO, Qing-hua YANG. Effects of controlled release nitrogen and urea ratio on nitrogen accumulation, transfer, and nitrogen-use efficiency of different summer maize varieties[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 81-95.
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 穗数 Ear number (plant·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Grain number | 百粒重 Hundred grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | YH988 | N0 | 74074ab | 481.79e | 26.30d | 6481.60e |
N180U | 79630a | 538.94d | 27.13cd | 8873.42c | ||
N180C | 72222b | 565.09abcd | 29.41b | 9450.72abc | ||
N180C1 | 76389ab | 586.71a | 31.05a | 9853.15ab | ||
N180C2 | 72222b | 567.30abc | 30.80a | 9285.72bc | ||
N300U | 76852ab | 551.44cd | 27.61c | 7874.18d | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 65278c | 492.40e | 29.89ab | 6700.54e | |
N180U | 71296b | 563.13abcd | 30.02ab | 9025.29c | ||
N180C | 72222b | 557.22bcd | 29.44b | 8886.66c | ||
N180C1 | 75000ab | 569.24abc | 30.07ab | 9454.43abc | ||
N180C2 | 73148b | 584.25ab | 30.59ab | 10027.62a | ||
N300U | 65278c | 538.48d | 29.95d | 9188.97c | ||
2019 | YH988 | N0 | 66667a | 455.97c | 26.53ab | 7845.25e |
N180U | 65740a | 566.27ab | 28.24ab | 10634.65ab | ||
N180C | 64814a | 589.68a | 27.38ab | 9169.49c | ||
N180C1 | 69444a | 576.64ab | 28.29ab | 11719.94a | ||
N180C2 | 65740a | 583.23ab | 28.01ab | 9805.86bc | ||
N300U | 66667a | 559.36ab | 28.42ab | 10749.58ab | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 65740a | 509.68bc | 26.54b | 8435.69d | |
N180U | 69444a | 568.61ab | 28.92ab | 10390.63ab | ||
N180C | 71296a | 519.73abc | 27.50ab | 10476.21ab | ||
N180C1 | 65740a | 535.25ab | 29.03ab | 10235.82ab | ||
N180C2 | 65740a | 573.95ab | 29.31a | 10772.16ab | ||
N300U | 66667a | 580.11ab | 29.39a | 10308.70ab | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | ns | *** | ns | ||
施氮处理Nitrogen application (N) | ns | *** | *** | *** | ||
年份Year (Y) | *** | ns | *** | *** | ||
品种×施氮处理V×N | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×年份V×Y | * | ns | ns | ns | ||
施氮处理×年份N×Y | ns | ns | * | ns | ||
品种×施氮处理×年份V×N×Y | ns | ns | * | ns |
Table 1 Effects of nitrogen treatments on yield and yield components of different maize varieties
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 穗数 Ear number (plant·hm-2) | 穗粒数 Grain number | 百粒重 Hundred grain weight (g) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | YH988 | N0 | 74074ab | 481.79e | 26.30d | 6481.60e |
N180U | 79630a | 538.94d | 27.13cd | 8873.42c | ||
N180C | 72222b | 565.09abcd | 29.41b | 9450.72abc | ||
N180C1 | 76389ab | 586.71a | 31.05a | 9853.15ab | ||
N180C2 | 72222b | 567.30abc | 30.80a | 9285.72bc | ||
N300U | 76852ab | 551.44cd | 27.61c | 7874.18d | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 65278c | 492.40e | 29.89ab | 6700.54e | |
N180U | 71296b | 563.13abcd | 30.02ab | 9025.29c | ||
N180C | 72222b | 557.22bcd | 29.44b | 8886.66c | ||
N180C1 | 75000ab | 569.24abc | 30.07ab | 9454.43abc | ||
N180C2 | 73148b | 584.25ab | 30.59ab | 10027.62a | ||
N300U | 65278c | 538.48d | 29.95d | 9188.97c | ||
2019 | YH988 | N0 | 66667a | 455.97c | 26.53ab | 7845.25e |
N180U | 65740a | 566.27ab | 28.24ab | 10634.65ab | ||
N180C | 64814a | 589.68a | 27.38ab | 9169.49c | ||
N180C1 | 69444a | 576.64ab | 28.29ab | 11719.94a | ||
N180C2 | 65740a | 583.23ab | 28.01ab | 9805.86bc | ||
N300U | 66667a | 559.36ab | 28.42ab | 10749.58ab | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 65740a | 509.68bc | 26.54b | 8435.69d | |
N180U | 69444a | 568.61ab | 28.92ab | 10390.63ab | ||
N180C | 71296a | 519.73abc | 27.50ab | 10476.21ab | ||
N180C1 | 65740a | 535.25ab | 29.03ab | 10235.82ab | ||
N180C2 | 65740a | 573.95ab | 29.31a | 10772.16ab | ||
N300U | 66667a | 580.11ab | 29.39a | 10308.70ab | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | ns | *** | ns | ||
施氮处理Nitrogen application (N) | ns | *** | *** | *** | ||
年份Year (Y) | *** | ns | *** | *** | ||
品种×施氮处理V×N | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×年份V×Y | * | ns | ns | ns | ||
施氮处理×年份N×Y | ns | ns | * | ns | ||
品种×施氮处理×年份V×N×Y | ns | ns | * | ns |
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 吐丝期秸秆氮含量Stover N content at R1 (kg·hm-2) | 收获期秸秆氮 含量Stover N content at harvest (kg·hm-2) | 秸秆氮素表观转移量 Apparent amount of N remobilization (kg·hm-2) | 收获期籽粒氮含量Grain N content (kg·hm-2) | 花后根系氮吸收及转移量Nitrogen from root absorption and transfer after flowering (kg·hm-2) | 氮收获指数N harvest index (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | YH988 | N0 | 103.49d | 59.31abc | 44.18e | 83.49c | 38.39cde | 58.73e |
N180U | 137.09ab | 49.16c | 86.74a | 111.54ab | 24.80e | 69.47ab | ||
N180C | 132.50ab | 67.39ab | 65.11bc | 123.47a | 46.89bcd | 64.82bcde | ||
N180C1 | 138.96a | 75.77a | 63.19bcd | 128.77a | 65.58ab | 62.92bcde | ||
N180C2 | 136.22ab | 48.68bc | 87.55a | 126.31ab | 38.76cde | 72.11a | ||
N300U | 141.22a | 65.86abc | 75.35abc | 103.37b | 29.59de | 61.73cde | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 115.80bc | 60.10abc | 55.70cd | 87.56d | 35.67de | 59.73de | |
N180U | 128.61ab | 57.97abc | 70.65abc | 115.63c | 44.99cde | 66.54abcd | ||
N180C | 141.88a | 58.88abc | 83.00ab | 123.16bc | 48.05abcd | 67.84abc | ||
N180C1 | 141.83a | 60.00abc | 81.83ab | 129.93ab | 48.10abcd | 68.52abc | ||
N180C2 | 143.33a | 72.38a | 70.96abc | 138.40a | 67.45a | 65.90abcd | ||
N300U | 135.66ab | 60.67abc | 74.99abc | 133.04ab | 58.05abc | 68.67abc | ||
2019 | YH988 | N0 | 49.75d | 17.95d | 31.80c | 65.97d | 27.70abc | 78.54abc |
N180U | 73.54c | 24.15c | 49.39abc | 81.94bcd | 32.54abc | 77.20bcd | ||
N180C | 83.17abc | 24.41c | 58.77ab | 85.08bcd | 32.43abc | 77.47bc | ||
N180C1 | 79.02abc | 32.96ab | 46.06bc | 94.84abc | 41.44ab | 74.15cd | ||
N180C2 | 85.01abc | 33.75ab | 51.27ab | 87.83bcd | 36.57abc | 72.32d | ||
N300U | 94.04ab | 29.01bc | 65.03ab | 90.65bcd | 25.62 bc | 75.46bcd | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 77.05bc | 14.84d | 62.22ab | 74.06cd | 15.12c | 83.19a | |
N180U | 95.44ab | 26.64c | 68.80a | 105.03ab | 36.23abc | 79.60ab | ||
N180C | 89.27 abc | 26.66c | 62.61ab | 98.30abc | 35.69abc | 78.32bc | ||
N180C1 | 86.98abc | 25.36c | 61.62ab | 102.25ab | 47.50ab | 80.06ab | ||
N180C2 | 99.19a | 34.92a | 64.28ab | 115.81a | 51.54a | 76.76bcd | ||
N300U | 98.13a | 34.81ab | 63.32ab | 106.47ab | 43.16ab | 74.31cd | ||
品种Variety (V) | ** | ns | ** | *** | * | ** | ||
施氮处理Nitrogen application (N) | *** | ** | *** | *** | ** | ns | ||
年份Year (Y) | *** | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** | ||
品种×施氮处理V×N | ns | ** | ns | ns | ** | ns | ||
品种×年份V×Y | * | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | ||
施氮处理×年份N×Y | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | *** | ||
品种×施氮处理×年份V×N×Y | ns | ns | * | ns | ns | * |
Table 2 Differences in stover N content at silking and harvesting stage, apparent amount of N remobilization, grain N content at harvest stage, N from root absorption and transfer after flowering and N harvest index under different nitrogen treatments
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 吐丝期秸秆氮含量Stover N content at R1 (kg·hm-2) | 收获期秸秆氮 含量Stover N content at harvest (kg·hm-2) | 秸秆氮素表观转移量 Apparent amount of N remobilization (kg·hm-2) | 收获期籽粒氮含量Grain N content (kg·hm-2) | 花后根系氮吸收及转移量Nitrogen from root absorption and transfer after flowering (kg·hm-2) | 氮收获指数N harvest index (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | YH988 | N0 | 103.49d | 59.31abc | 44.18e | 83.49c | 38.39cde | 58.73e |
N180U | 137.09ab | 49.16c | 86.74a | 111.54ab | 24.80e | 69.47ab | ||
N180C | 132.50ab | 67.39ab | 65.11bc | 123.47a | 46.89bcd | 64.82bcde | ||
N180C1 | 138.96a | 75.77a | 63.19bcd | 128.77a | 65.58ab | 62.92bcde | ||
N180C2 | 136.22ab | 48.68bc | 87.55a | 126.31ab | 38.76cde | 72.11a | ||
N300U | 141.22a | 65.86abc | 75.35abc | 103.37b | 29.59de | 61.73cde | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 115.80bc | 60.10abc | 55.70cd | 87.56d | 35.67de | 59.73de | |
N180U | 128.61ab | 57.97abc | 70.65abc | 115.63c | 44.99cde | 66.54abcd | ||
N180C | 141.88a | 58.88abc | 83.00ab | 123.16bc | 48.05abcd | 67.84abc | ||
N180C1 | 141.83a | 60.00abc | 81.83ab | 129.93ab | 48.10abcd | 68.52abc | ||
N180C2 | 143.33a | 72.38a | 70.96abc | 138.40a | 67.45a | 65.90abcd | ||
N300U | 135.66ab | 60.67abc | 74.99abc | 133.04ab | 58.05abc | 68.67abc | ||
2019 | YH988 | N0 | 49.75d | 17.95d | 31.80c | 65.97d | 27.70abc | 78.54abc |
N180U | 73.54c | 24.15c | 49.39abc | 81.94bcd | 32.54abc | 77.20bcd | ||
N180C | 83.17abc | 24.41c | 58.77ab | 85.08bcd | 32.43abc | 77.47bc | ||
N180C1 | 79.02abc | 32.96ab | 46.06bc | 94.84abc | 41.44ab | 74.15cd | ||
N180C2 | 85.01abc | 33.75ab | 51.27ab | 87.83bcd | 36.57abc | 72.32d | ||
N300U | 94.04ab | 29.01bc | 65.03ab | 90.65bcd | 25.62 bc | 75.46bcd | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 77.05bc | 14.84d | 62.22ab | 74.06cd | 15.12c | 83.19a | |
N180U | 95.44ab | 26.64c | 68.80a | 105.03ab | 36.23abc | 79.60ab | ||
N180C | 89.27 abc | 26.66c | 62.61ab | 98.30abc | 35.69abc | 78.32bc | ||
N180C1 | 86.98abc | 25.36c | 61.62ab | 102.25ab | 47.50ab | 80.06ab | ||
N180C2 | 99.19a | 34.92a | 64.28ab | 115.81a | 51.54a | 76.76bcd | ||
N300U | 98.13a | 34.81ab | 63.32ab | 106.47ab | 43.16ab | 74.31cd | ||
品种Variety (V) | ** | ns | ** | *** | * | ** | ||
施氮处理Nitrogen application (N) | *** | ** | *** | *** | ** | ns | ||
年份Year (Y) | *** | *** | *** | *** | ** | *** | ||
品种×施氮处理V×N | ns | ** | ns | ns | ** | ns | ||
品种×年份V×Y | * | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | ||
施氮处理×年份N×Y | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | *** | ||
品种×施氮处理×年份V×N×Y | ns | ns | * | ns | ns | * |
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥偏生产力 PFPN (kg·kg-1) | 氮肥农学效率 ANUE (kg·kg-1) | 氮肥回收效率 NRE (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | YH988 | N0 | |||
N180U | 48.14c | 13.29cde | 11.91e | ||
N180C | 52.55abc | 16.50abc | 28.68abc | ||
N180C1 | 54.74ab | 18.73a | 30.63ab | ||
N180C2 | 49.85bc | 15.58abcd | 23.50cde | ||
N300U | 25.36e | 4.64g | 10.52e | ||
ZD958 | N0 | ||||
N180U | 50.14c | 12.92de | 14.41de | ||
N180C | 49.37c | 12.15e | 19.10cde | ||
N180C1 | 52.52abc | 15.30bcde | 23.48bcd | ||
N180C2 | 55.71a | 18.48ab | 35.07a | ||
N300U | 30.63d | 8.29f | 25.58abc | ||
2019 | YH988 | N0 | |||
N180U | 59.08ab | 9.58c | 12.31c | ||
N180C | 50.94b | 19.65b | 14.20bc | ||
N180C1 | 65.11a | 28.23a | 24.37abc | ||
N180C2 | 54.48b | 27.05a | 19.32abc | ||
N300U | 35.83d | 14.11bc | 19.85abc | ||
ZD958 | N0 | ||||
N180U | 57.73ab | 13.14bc | 23.77abc | ||
N180C | 58.20ab | 13.03bc | 20.04abc | ||
N180C1 | 56.87ab | 13.20bc | 21.51abc | ||
N180C2 | 59.85ab | 18.77b | 34.35a | ||
N300U | 34.36d | 8.65c | 30.23ab | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | ns | ** | ||
施氮处理Nitrogen application (N) | *** | *** | ** | ||
年份Year (Y) | *** | ns | ns | ||
品种×施氮处理V×N | ns | ns | ** | ||
品种×年份V×Y | ns | ns | ns | ||
施氮处理×年份N×Y | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×施氮处理×年份V×N×Y | ns | ns | ns |
Table 3 Nitrogen use efficiency of maize under different nitrogen treatments of different maize varieties
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥偏生产力 PFPN (kg·kg-1) | 氮肥农学效率 ANUE (kg·kg-1) | 氮肥回收效率 NRE (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | YH988 | N0 | |||
N180U | 48.14c | 13.29cde | 11.91e | ||
N180C | 52.55abc | 16.50abc | 28.68abc | ||
N180C1 | 54.74ab | 18.73a | 30.63ab | ||
N180C2 | 49.85bc | 15.58abcd | 23.50cde | ||
N300U | 25.36e | 4.64g | 10.52e | ||
ZD958 | N0 | ||||
N180U | 50.14c | 12.92de | 14.41de | ||
N180C | 49.37c | 12.15e | 19.10cde | ||
N180C1 | 52.52abc | 15.30bcde | 23.48bcd | ||
N180C2 | 55.71a | 18.48ab | 35.07a | ||
N300U | 30.63d | 8.29f | 25.58abc | ||
2019 | YH988 | N0 | |||
N180U | 59.08ab | 9.58c | 12.31c | ||
N180C | 50.94b | 19.65b | 14.20bc | ||
N180C1 | 65.11a | 28.23a | 24.37abc | ||
N180C2 | 54.48b | 27.05a | 19.32abc | ||
N300U | 35.83d | 14.11bc | 19.85abc | ||
ZD958 | N0 | ||||
N180U | 57.73ab | 13.14bc | 23.77abc | ||
N180C | 58.20ab | 13.03bc | 20.04abc | ||
N180C1 | 56.87ab | 13.20bc | 21.51abc | ||
N180C2 | 59.85ab | 18.77b | 34.35a | ||
N300U | 34.36d | 8.65c | 30.23ab | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | ns | ** | ||
施氮处理Nitrogen application (N) | *** | *** | ** | ||
年份Year (Y) | *** | ns | ns | ||
品种×施氮处理V×N | ns | ns | ** | ||
品种×年份V×Y | ns | ns | ns | ||
施氮处理×年份N×Y | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×施氮处理×年份V×N×Y | ns | ns | ns |
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 肥料投入Fertilizer inputs (CNY·hm-2) | 人工投入Manual input (CNY·hm-2) | 其他投入Other inputs (CNY·hm-2) | 总投入 Total input (CNY·hm-2) | 产量收入 Production of income (CNY·hm-2) | 纯收益 Net income (CNY·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | YH988 | N0 | 0 | 0 | 2811.6 | 2811.6 | 10240.9d | 7429.3de |
N180U | 807.9 | 1500 | 2811.6 | 5119.5 | 14020.0b | 8900.5b | ||
N180C | 3200.0 | 0 | 2811.6 | 6011.6 | 14932.1b | 8920.5b | ||
N180C1 | 1606.9 | 0 | 2811.6 | 4418.5 | 15568.0a | 11149.5a | ||
N180C2 | 2403.5 | 0 | 2811.6 | 5215.1 | 14671.4b | 9456.3b | ||
N300U | 1347.3 | 1500 | 2811.6 | 5658.9 | 12441.2c | 6782.3e | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 0 | 0 | 2895.0 | 2895.0 | 10586.9d | 7691.9de | |
N180U | 807.9 | 1500 | 2895.0 | 5202.9 | 14260.0b | 9057.1b | ||
N180C | 3200.0 | 0 | 2895.0 | 6095.0 | 14041.0b | 7946.0cd | ||
N180C1 | 1606.9 | 0 | 2895.0 | 4502.0 | 14938.0b | 10436.1a | ||
N180C2 | 2403.5 | 0 | 2895.0 | 5298.5 | 15843.6a | 10545.2a | ||
N300U | 1347.3 | 1500 | 2895.0 | 5742.3 | 14518.6b | 8776.3bc | ||
2019 | YH988 | N0 | 0 | 0 | 2811.6 | 2811.6 | 12395.5d | 9583.9bc |
N180U | 807.9 | 1500 | 2811.6 | 5119.5 | 16802.7b | 11683.2ab | ||
N180C | 3200.0 | 0 | 2811.6 | 6011.6 | 14487.8bc | 8476.2c | ||
N180C1 | 1606.9 | 0 | 2811.6 | 4418.5 | 18517.5a | 14099.0a | ||
N180C2 | 2403.5 | 0 | 2811.6 | 5215.1 | 15493.3bc | 10278.1b | ||
N300U | 1347.3 | 1500 | 2811.6 | 5658.9 | 17055.4ab | 11396.5a | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 0 | 0 | 2895.0 | 2895.0 | 13328.4c | 10433.4b | |
N180U | 807.9 | 1500 | 2895.0 | 5202.9 | 16417.2b | 11214.3ab | ||
N180C | 3200.0 | 0 | 2895.0 | 6095.0 | 16552.4b | 10457.4b | ||
N180C1 | 1606.9 | 0 | 2895.0 | 4502.0 | 16172.6b | 11670.6ab | ||
N180C2 | 2403.5 | 0 | 2895.0 | 5298.5 | 17020.0ab | 11721.5ab | ||
N300U | 1347.3 | 1500 | 2895.0 | 5742.3 | 16287.7b | 10545.5ab | ||
品种Variety (V) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
施氮处理Nitrogen application (N) | *** | *** | ns | *** | ** | ** | ||
年份Year (Y) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | *** | ||
品种×施氮处理V×N | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×年份V×Y | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
施氮处理×年份N×Y | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×施氮处理×年份V×N×Y | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Table 4 Effects of nitrogen treatments on economic benefits of different maize varieties
年份 Year | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 肥料投入Fertilizer inputs (CNY·hm-2) | 人工投入Manual input (CNY·hm-2) | 其他投入Other inputs (CNY·hm-2) | 总投入 Total input (CNY·hm-2) | 产量收入 Production of income (CNY·hm-2) | 纯收益 Net income (CNY·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2018 | YH988 | N0 | 0 | 0 | 2811.6 | 2811.6 | 10240.9d | 7429.3de |
N180U | 807.9 | 1500 | 2811.6 | 5119.5 | 14020.0b | 8900.5b | ||
N180C | 3200.0 | 0 | 2811.6 | 6011.6 | 14932.1b | 8920.5b | ||
N180C1 | 1606.9 | 0 | 2811.6 | 4418.5 | 15568.0a | 11149.5a | ||
N180C2 | 2403.5 | 0 | 2811.6 | 5215.1 | 14671.4b | 9456.3b | ||
N300U | 1347.3 | 1500 | 2811.6 | 5658.9 | 12441.2c | 6782.3e | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 0 | 0 | 2895.0 | 2895.0 | 10586.9d | 7691.9de | |
N180U | 807.9 | 1500 | 2895.0 | 5202.9 | 14260.0b | 9057.1b | ||
N180C | 3200.0 | 0 | 2895.0 | 6095.0 | 14041.0b | 7946.0cd | ||
N180C1 | 1606.9 | 0 | 2895.0 | 4502.0 | 14938.0b | 10436.1a | ||
N180C2 | 2403.5 | 0 | 2895.0 | 5298.5 | 15843.6a | 10545.2a | ||
N300U | 1347.3 | 1500 | 2895.0 | 5742.3 | 14518.6b | 8776.3bc | ||
2019 | YH988 | N0 | 0 | 0 | 2811.6 | 2811.6 | 12395.5d | 9583.9bc |
N180U | 807.9 | 1500 | 2811.6 | 5119.5 | 16802.7b | 11683.2ab | ||
N180C | 3200.0 | 0 | 2811.6 | 6011.6 | 14487.8bc | 8476.2c | ||
N180C1 | 1606.9 | 0 | 2811.6 | 4418.5 | 18517.5a | 14099.0a | ||
N180C2 | 2403.5 | 0 | 2811.6 | 5215.1 | 15493.3bc | 10278.1b | ||
N300U | 1347.3 | 1500 | 2811.6 | 5658.9 | 17055.4ab | 11396.5a | ||
ZD958 | N0 | 0 | 0 | 2895.0 | 2895.0 | 13328.4c | 10433.4b | |
N180U | 807.9 | 1500 | 2895.0 | 5202.9 | 16417.2b | 11214.3ab | ||
N180C | 3200.0 | 0 | 2895.0 | 6095.0 | 16552.4b | 10457.4b | ||
N180C1 | 1606.9 | 0 | 2895.0 | 4502.0 | 16172.6b | 11670.6ab | ||
N180C2 | 2403.5 | 0 | 2895.0 | 5298.5 | 17020.0ab | 11721.5ab | ||
N300U | 1347.3 | 1500 | 2895.0 | 5742.3 | 16287.7b | 10545.5ab | ||
品种Variety (V) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
施氮处理Nitrogen application (N) | *** | *** | ns | *** | ** | ** | ||
年份Year (Y) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | *** | ||
品种×施氮处理V×N | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×年份V×Y | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
施氮处理×年份N×Y | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×施氮处理×年份V×N×Y | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
1 | Zhang Z Y, Mao X F, Yang J. Maize at the crossroads: Staple food grain or feed grain. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(6): 38-53. |
张在一, 毛学峰, 杨军. 站在变革十字路口的玉米: 主粮还是饲料粮之论. 中国农村经济, 2019(6): 38-53. | |
2 | 中华人民共和国统计局. 中国统计年鉴. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2019. |
The Statistical Bureau of the People’s Republic of China. China statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2019. | |
3 | Liu W R, Zheng J Y, Luo Y, et al. Research advance on physiological changes respond to level of N application. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2010, 25(Supple1): 239-242. |
刘武仁, 郑金玉, 罗洋, 等. 概述氮肥水平对玉米生理及产量性状的影响. 华北农学报, 2010, 25(增刊1): 239-242. | |
4 | Sun H, Zhang J W, Jin L B. Problems and approaches of achieving high yield and high nitrogen use efficiency in maize production. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2014, 22(1): 143-148. |
孙浒, 张吉旺, 靳立斌. 玉米高产与氮肥高效协同实现存在的问题及其途径. 玉米科学, 2014, 22(1): 143-148. | |
5 | Wang D, Ji D Z, Ma L, et al. Effects of corn yield and nitrogen application on nitrogen use efficiency. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2013(6): 42-46. |
王端, 纪德智, 马琳, 等. 春玉米产量和施氮量对氮素利用率的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2013(6): 42-46. | |
6 | Guo P, Zhu C H, Zha L, et al. Effects of the combined application of slow-release urea and urea on activities of key enzymes related to nitrogen metabolism and nitrogen utilization of maize. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2016(6): 99-105. |
郭萍, 朱从桦, 査丽, 等. 缓释尿素与普通尿素不同配比对玉米氮代谢酶和氮素利用的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(6): 99-105. | |
7 | Tian X J. Research on the cost of foodstuff production in China. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2005. |
田新建. 中国粮食生产成本研究. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2005. | |
8 | Shoji S, Delgado J, Mosier A, et al. Use of controlled release fertilizers and nitrification inhibitors to increase nitrogen use efficiency and to conserve air and water quality. Communications in Soil Science & Plant Analysis, 2001, 32(7): 1051-1070. |
9 | Li M, Wu J, Han S, et al. Effect of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer as jointing fertilizer on yield, dry matter and nitrogen accumulation and distribution in winter wheat. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2017, 37(7): 955-962. |
李敏, 武际, 韩上, 等. 控释氮肥拔节期施用对冬小麦产量及干物质、氮素累积与分配的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(7): 955-962. | |
10 | Gao X, Li C, Zhang M, et al. Controlled release urea improved the nitrogen use efficiency, yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) on silt loamy soil. Field Crops Research, 2015, 181: 60-68. |
11 | Yang Y C, Zhang M, Li Y C, et al. Controlled release urea improved nitrogen use efficiency, activities of leaf enzymes, and rice yield. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2012, 76(6): 2307-2317. |
12 | Feng X J, Zhan X M, Wang X X, et al. Effects of soil inorganic nitrogen and nitrogen absorbing by maize under the reduced application of coated urea at different proportions. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(10): 1733-1745. |
冯小杰, 战秀梅, 王雪鑫, 等. 包膜尿素不同配比减施对土壤无机氮含量及玉米氮素吸收的影响. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(10): 1733-1745. | |
13 | Ji Y, Yu H Y, Xu H. Effect of controlled-release fertilizer and its combined application with urea on CH4 and N2O emissions in rice soil. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2017, 26(9): 1494-1500. |
纪洋, 于海洋, 徐华. 控释肥与尿素配合施用对稻季土壤CH4和N2O排放的影响. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(9): 1494-1500. | |
14 | Jin R, Li L, Guo P, et al. Effect of the mixed ratios of controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on soil nitrogen content and its uptake and utilization of maize. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(6): 214-221. |
金容, 李兰, 郭萍, 等. 控释氮肥比例对土壤氮含量和玉米氮素吸收利用的影响. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(6): 214-221. | |
15 | Ji J H, Li Y Y, Liu S Q, et al. Effect of different mixing rates of controlled-release urea and common urea on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of spring maize. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2015, 46(3): 669-675. |
姬景红, 李玉影, 刘双全, 等. 控释掺混肥对春玉米产量、光合特性及氮肥利用率的影响. 土壤通报, 2015, 46(3): 669-675. | |
16 | Li W, Li X H, Li H Y, et al. Effects of different mixing rates of controlled-release urea and common urea on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of summer maize. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(4): 699-706. |
李伟, 李絮花, 李海燕, 等. 控释尿素与普通尿素混施对夏玉米产量和氮肥效率的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38(4): 699-706. | |
17 | Guo J J, Zhang F C, Yan S C, et al. Effects of blending of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer and urea on maize physiological characteristics and nitrogen uptake. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(5): 1194-1204. |
郭金金, 张富仓, 闫世程, 等. 缓释氮肥与尿素掺混对玉米生理特性和氮素吸收的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(5): 1194-1204. | |
18 | Guo J J, Zhang F C, Wang H D, et al. Effects of slow-release nitrogen fertilizer and urea blending on maize growth and nitrogen uptake under different nitrogen application rates. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2017, 50(20): 3930-3943. |
郭金金, 张富仓, 王海东, 等. 不同施氮量下缓释氮肥与尿素掺混对玉米生长与氮素吸收利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(20): 3930-3943. | |
19 | Wang L M, Ye Y L, Chen F J, et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on maize yield and nitrogen efficiency of different maize varieties. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2012, 20(5): 529-535. |
王玲敏, 叶优良, 陈范骏, 等. 施氮对不同品种玉米产量、氮效率的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(5): 529-535. | |
20 | Li Q, Kong F L, Yuan J C. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer operation on dry matter production and yield of maize cultivars with contrasting nitrogen efficiency. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2018, 33(6): 174-182. |
李强, 孔凡磊, 袁继超. 氮肥运筹对不同氮效率玉米品种干物质生产及产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2018, 33(6): 174-182. | |
21 | Chen D. Pilot study on coated slow/controlled release fertilizer and the determination of slow/controlled fertilizer. Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2016. |
陈迪. 包膜缓/控释肥中试研究及缓/控释肥规律测定. 郑州: 郑州大学, 2016. | |
22 | Wu L Q, Wu L, Cui Z L, et al. Basic NPK fertilizer recommendation and fertilizer formula for maize production regions in China. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(4): 802-817. |
吴良泉, 武良, 崔振岭, 等. 中国玉米区域氮磷钾肥推荐用量及肥料配方研究. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(4): 802-817. | |
23 | Zhang F S, Wang J Q, Zhang W F, et al. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5): 915-924. |
张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 915-924. | |
24 | Yan P. The mechanisms of root-zone N management regulates maize canopy development with high yield and high N use efficiency. Beijing: China Agricultural University, 2015. |
颜鹏. 支撑夏玉米高产高效群体的根层氮素调控机制与途径. 北京: 中国农业大学, 2015. | |
25 | Li W J, He P, Gao Q, et al. Dry matter formation and nitrogen uptake in two maize cultivars differing in nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2010, 16(1): 51-57. |
李文娟, 何萍, 高强, 等. 不同氮效率玉米干物质形成及氮素营养特性差异研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(1): 51-57. | |
26 | Li Z S, Tan D S, Wang W, et al. Effects of different controlled release fertilizers on agronomic characters and yield of summer maize. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 46(9): 85-88. |
李子双, 谭德水, 王薇, 等. 不同控释肥对夏玉米农艺性状及产量的影响. 山东农业科学, 2014, 46(9): 85-88. | |
27 | Yi W P, Zhu G L, Wu L, et al. Application of different release duration controlled-release coated urea combined with conventional urea on summer maize. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2010, 16(6): 1497-1502. |
衣文平, 朱国梁, 武良, 等. 不同量的包膜控释尿素与普通尿素配施在夏玉米上的应用研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(6): 1497-1502. | |
28 | Zheng W, Liu Z, Zhang M, et al. Improving crop yields, nitrogen use efficiencies, and profits by using mixtures of coated controlled-released and uncoated urea in a wheat-maize system. Field Crops Research, 2017, 205: 106-115. |
29 | Zheng W, Zhang M, Liu Z, et al. Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea to improve the nitrogen use efficiency and yield under wheat-maize double cropping system. Field Crops Research, 2016, 197: 52-62. |
30 | Chen G P. Production and distribution of dry matter in maize. Journal of Maize Sciences, 1994, 2(1): 48-53. |
陈国平. 玉米的干物质生产与分配. 玉米科学, 1994, 2(1): 48-53. | |
31 | Zhang F S, Cui Z L, Chen X P, et al. Integrated nutrient management for food security and environmental quality in China. Advances in Agronomy, 2012, 116: 1-40. |
32 | Meng Q F, Yue S C, Hou P, et al. Improving yield and nitrogen use efficiency simultaneously for maize and wheat in China: A review. Pedosphere, 2016, 26(2): 137-147. |
33 | Bertin P, Gallais A. Genetic variation for nitrogen use efficiency in a set of recombinant maize inbred lines. I. Agrophysiological results. Maydica, 2000, 45(1): 53-66. |
34 | Gallais A, Coque M. Genetic variation and selection for nitrogen use efficiency in maize: A synthesis. Maydica, 2005, 50(3): 531-547. |
35 | He P, Jin J Y, Lin B, et al. Dynamics of biomass and its componentis and models of nutrients absorption by spring maize under different nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium application rates. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 1998(2): 123-130. |
何萍, 金继运, 林葆, 等. 不同氮磷钾用量下春玉米生物产量及其组分动态与养分吸收模式研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998(2): 123-130. | |
36 | Chen X P, Cui Z L, Meng Q F, et al. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature, 2014, 514(7523): 486-489. |
37 | Cassman K G, Dobermann A, Walters D T. Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 2002, 31(2): 132-140. |
38 | Farmaha B S, Sims A L. The influence of polymer-coated urea and urea fertilizer mixtures on spring wheat protein concentrations and economic returns. Agronomy Journal, 2013, 105(5): 1328-1334. |
[1] | XIE Kai-yun, WANG Yu-xiang, WAN Jiang-chun, ZHANG Shu-zhen, SUI Xiao-qing, ZHAO Yun, ZHANG Bo. Mechanisms and factors affecting nitrogen transfer in mixed legume/grass swards: A review [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(3): 157-170. |
[2] | ZHU Ya-qiong, YU Hui, ZHENG Wei, LI Song-song, Naerkezi, LIU Yue-han, HAO Shuai, Ailifeire. Effects of different planting configurations on yield of Avena sativa and Vicia sativa mixed plantings with soybean in alpine pastures [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(1): 74-85. |
[3] | HU Wei, ZHANG Ya-hong, LI Peng, WANG Xiao-ju, ZHANG Peng, HE Yi, KANG Xin-yun. Effects of water and nitrogen supply under drip irrigation on the production performance rate and water and nitrogen use efficiency of alfalfa [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(2): 41-50. |
[4] | ZHU Ya-qiong, GUAN Zheng-xuan, ZHENG Wei, WANG Xiang. Effects of species diversity and community structure on nitrogen use efficiency of mixed legume+grass pastures [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(10): 1-14. |
[5] | WANG Qian, JI Shu-Ren, SHEN Yi-Xin. Interactive effects of soil moisture and nitrogen application rate on seedling growth of alfalfa [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(12): 48-55. |
[6] | CHEN Ji-Kang, TAN Long-Tao, YU Chun-Ming, ZHU Ai-Guo, CHEN Ping, WANG Yan-Zhou, ZHU Tao-Tao, XIONG He-Ping. Effects of different nitrogen levels on key enzyme activities associated with nitrogen metabolism of feed ramie [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(10): 207-218. |
[7] | XIE Kai-yun, ZHAO Yun, LI Xiang-lin, HE Feng, WAN Li-qiang, WANG Dan, HAN Dong-mei. Relationships between grasses and legumes in mixed grassland: a review [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(3): 284-. |
[8] | WANG Ping1, ZHOU Daowei2,JIANG Shicheng3. Research on biological nitrogen fixation of grass-legume mixtures in a semiarid area of China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(6): 276-280. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||