Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 180-189.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2022354
Meng-qi LIANG(), Qi-feng WU, Tao SHAO, Ai-li WU, Qin-hua LIU()
Received:
2022-08-31
Revised:
2022-10-10
Online:
2023-05-20
Published:
2023-03-20
Contact:
Qin-hua LIU
Meng-qi LIANG, Qi-feng WU, Tao SHAO, Ai-li WU, Qin-hua LIU. Effects of additives on the fermentation quality and α-tocopherol and β-carotene contents in Italian ryegrass silage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 180-189.
项目Items | 含量Content |
---|---|
pH | 6.07 |
缓冲能Buffering capacity (mEq·kg-1 DM) | 49.2 |
干物质Dry matter (g·kg-1 FW) | 302 |
粗蛋白Crude protein (g·kg-1 DM) | 7.23 |
水溶性碳水化合物Water soluble carbohydrates (g·kg-1 DM) | 233 |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fibre (g·kg-1 DM) | 556 |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fibre (g·kg-1 DM) | 306 |
酸性洗涤木质素Acid detergent lignin (g·kg-1 DM) | 57.4 |
乳酸菌Lactic acid bacteria (lg cfu·g-1 FW) | 6.87 |
好氧性细菌Aerobic bacteria (lg cfu·g-1 FW) | 7.35 |
酵母菌Yeasts (lg cfu·g-1 FW) | 6.40 |
霉菌Mold (lg cfu·g-1 FW) | <1.00 |
α-生育酚α-tocopherol (mg·kg-1 DM) | 15.3 |
β-胡萝卜素β-carotene (mg·kg-1 DM) | 57.4 |
Table 1 Chemical and microbial compositions ofItalian ryegrass before silage
项目Items | 含量Content |
---|---|
pH | 6.07 |
缓冲能Buffering capacity (mEq·kg-1 DM) | 49.2 |
干物质Dry matter (g·kg-1 FW) | 302 |
粗蛋白Crude protein (g·kg-1 DM) | 7.23 |
水溶性碳水化合物Water soluble carbohydrates (g·kg-1 DM) | 233 |
中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fibre (g·kg-1 DM) | 556 |
酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fibre (g·kg-1 DM) | 306 |
酸性洗涤木质素Acid detergent lignin (g·kg-1 DM) | 57.4 |
乳酸菌Lactic acid bacteria (lg cfu·g-1 FW) | 6.87 |
好氧性细菌Aerobic bacteria (lg cfu·g-1 FW) | 7.35 |
酵母菌Yeasts (lg cfu·g-1 FW) | 6.40 |
霉菌Mold (lg cfu·g-1 FW) | <1.00 |
α-生育酚α-tocopherol (mg·kg-1 DM) | 15.3 |
β-胡萝卜素β-carotene (mg·kg-1 DM) | 57.4 |
青贮时间 Ensiling time (d) | 添加剂 Additive | pH | 乳酸 Lactic acid (g·kg-1 DM) | 乙酸 Acetic acid (g·kg-1 DM) | 丙酸 Propionic acid (g·kg-1 DM) | 丁酸 Butyric acid (g·kg-1 DM) | 乙醇 Ethanol (g·kg-1 DM) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | CK | 4.79a | 78.0jkl | 6.76g | 2.83cde | 9.31defg | 0.016 |
PA | 4.84a | 71.1kl | 8.21fg | 16.08a | 5.75efg | 0.012 | |
LP | 4.18c | 126.2fgh | 8.63efg | 2.72cde | 6.51efg | 0.020 | |
BC | 4.19c | 106.9ghij | 6.87fg | 2.78cde | 7.79efg | 0.003 | |
LP+BC | 4.07d | 138.6defg | 8.22fg | 2.73cde | 7.55efg | ND | |
7 | CK | 4.46b | 97.3hijk | 7.86fg | 2.02cde | 12.18cd | 0.040 |
PA | 4.54b | 82.9ijkl | 9.43defg | 17.15a | 8.80defg | 0.053 | |
LP | 3.90efg | 162.7cde | 10.17cdefg | 1.83de | 8.20defg | 0.003 | |
BC | 3.85g | 168.8bcd | 8.72efg | 2.25cde | 8.38defg | ND | |
LP+BC | 3.87fg | 157.3cdef | 8.75efg | 1.80de | 8.76defg | 0.038 | |
35 | CK | 3.98def | 124.6gh | 13.52abc | 1.39e | 18.03a | 0.012 |
PA | 3.93efg | 127.2fgh | 16.99a | 15.46a | 13.67bc | ND | |
LP | 3.58ij | 197.1ab | 12.43cde | 4.16c | 8.05defg | ND | |
BC | 3.74h | 185.2bc | 10.33cdefg | 4.05cd | 9.54def | 0.007 | |
LP+BC | 3.55j | 183.3bc | 10.91cdef | 2.73cde | 7.75efg | 0.038 | |
70 | CK | 4.25c | 61.0l | 6.35g | 1.16e | 16.49ab | 0.006 |
PA | 4.00de | 110.7ghi | 16.30ab | 11.24b | 10.08cde | 0.006 | |
LP | 3.71h | 130.6fg | 9.09efg | 2.18cde | 5.58fg | 0.037 | |
BC | 3.71h | 135.1efg | 8.25fg | 2.77cde | 4.93g | 0.025 | |
LP+BC | 3.68hi | 217.3a | 13.06bcd | 3.19cde | 8.99defg | 0.007 | |
青贮时间Ensiling time (d) | |||||||
3 | 4.41a | 104.2c | 7.74c | 5.43a | 7.38b | 0.010 | |
7 | 4.12b | 133.8b | 8.98bc | 5.01a | 9.26ab | 0.027 | |
35 | 3.76c | 163.5a | 12.84a | 5.56a | 11.41a | 0.011 | |
70 | 3.87c | 130.9b | 10.61b | 4.11b | 9.22ab | 0.016 | |
添加剂Additive | |||||||
CK | 4.37a | 90.2c | 8.62b | 1.85b | 14.00a | 0.018 | |
PA | 4.33a | 97.9c | 12.73a | 14.98a | 9.58b | 0.018 | |
LP | 3.85b | 154.2ab | 10.08b | 2.72b | 7.08b | 0.015 | |
BC | 3.87b | 148.9b | 8.54b | 2.96b | 7.67b | 0.009 | |
LP+BC | 3.79b | 174.1a | 10.24b | 2.61b | 8.27b | 0.021 | |
标准误Standard error | 0.04 | 5.16 | 0.40 | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.472 | |
显著性Significance | |||||||
添加剂Additive | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.785 | |
青贮时间Ensiling time | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.255 | |
交互作用Interaction | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.110 |
Table 2 Effects of additive and ensiling time on the pH and organic acid content of Italian ryegrass silage
青贮时间 Ensiling time (d) | 添加剂 Additive | pH | 乳酸 Lactic acid (g·kg-1 DM) | 乙酸 Acetic acid (g·kg-1 DM) | 丙酸 Propionic acid (g·kg-1 DM) | 丁酸 Butyric acid (g·kg-1 DM) | 乙醇 Ethanol (g·kg-1 DM) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | CK | 4.79a | 78.0jkl | 6.76g | 2.83cde | 9.31defg | 0.016 |
PA | 4.84a | 71.1kl | 8.21fg | 16.08a | 5.75efg | 0.012 | |
LP | 4.18c | 126.2fgh | 8.63efg | 2.72cde | 6.51efg | 0.020 | |
BC | 4.19c | 106.9ghij | 6.87fg | 2.78cde | 7.79efg | 0.003 | |
LP+BC | 4.07d | 138.6defg | 8.22fg | 2.73cde | 7.55efg | ND | |
7 | CK | 4.46b | 97.3hijk | 7.86fg | 2.02cde | 12.18cd | 0.040 |
PA | 4.54b | 82.9ijkl | 9.43defg | 17.15a | 8.80defg | 0.053 | |
LP | 3.90efg | 162.7cde | 10.17cdefg | 1.83de | 8.20defg | 0.003 | |
BC | 3.85g | 168.8bcd | 8.72efg | 2.25cde | 8.38defg | ND | |
LP+BC | 3.87fg | 157.3cdef | 8.75efg | 1.80de | 8.76defg | 0.038 | |
35 | CK | 3.98def | 124.6gh | 13.52abc | 1.39e | 18.03a | 0.012 |
PA | 3.93efg | 127.2fgh | 16.99a | 15.46a | 13.67bc | ND | |
LP | 3.58ij | 197.1ab | 12.43cde | 4.16c | 8.05defg | ND | |
BC | 3.74h | 185.2bc | 10.33cdefg | 4.05cd | 9.54def | 0.007 | |
LP+BC | 3.55j | 183.3bc | 10.91cdef | 2.73cde | 7.75efg | 0.038 | |
70 | CK | 4.25c | 61.0l | 6.35g | 1.16e | 16.49ab | 0.006 |
PA | 4.00de | 110.7ghi | 16.30ab | 11.24b | 10.08cde | 0.006 | |
LP | 3.71h | 130.6fg | 9.09efg | 2.18cde | 5.58fg | 0.037 | |
BC | 3.71h | 135.1efg | 8.25fg | 2.77cde | 4.93g | 0.025 | |
LP+BC | 3.68hi | 217.3a | 13.06bcd | 3.19cde | 8.99defg | 0.007 | |
青贮时间Ensiling time (d) | |||||||
3 | 4.41a | 104.2c | 7.74c | 5.43a | 7.38b | 0.010 | |
7 | 4.12b | 133.8b | 8.98bc | 5.01a | 9.26ab | 0.027 | |
35 | 3.76c | 163.5a | 12.84a | 5.56a | 11.41a | 0.011 | |
70 | 3.87c | 130.9b | 10.61b | 4.11b | 9.22ab | 0.016 | |
添加剂Additive | |||||||
CK | 4.37a | 90.2c | 8.62b | 1.85b | 14.00a | 0.018 | |
PA | 4.33a | 97.9c | 12.73a | 14.98a | 9.58b | 0.018 | |
LP | 3.85b | 154.2ab | 10.08b | 2.72b | 7.08b | 0.015 | |
BC | 3.87b | 148.9b | 8.54b | 2.96b | 7.67b | 0.009 | |
LP+BC | 3.79b | 174.1a | 10.24b | 2.61b | 8.27b | 0.021 | |
标准误Standard error | 0.04 | 5.16 | 0.40 | 0.59 | 0.45 | 0.472 | |
显著性Significance | |||||||
添加剂Additive | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.785 | |
青贮时间Ensiling time | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.005 | <0.001 | 0.255 | |
交互作用Interaction | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | 0.004 | 0.110 |
青贮时间 Ensiling time (d) | 添加剂 Additive | 干物质 Dry matter (g·kg-1) | 氨态氮/总氮 Ammonia nitrogen/ total nitrogen (g·kg-1 N) | 乳酸/乙酸 Lactic acid/ acetic acid (LA/AA) |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | CK | 278 | 58.4g | 11.71fgh |
PA | 286 | 83.9efg | 8.79hi | |
LP | 285 | 62.5g | 14.90cde | |
BC | 282 | 111.3cde | 15.57bcd | |
LP+BC | 276 | 162.4b | 16.97abcd | |
7 | CK | 275 | 152.4bc | 12.39efg |
PA | 285 | 202.8a | 8.96hi | |
LP | 281 | 154.4b | 16.41abcd | |
BC | 264 | 138.9bcd | 19.39a | |
LP+BC | 284 | 128.7bcd | 18.49ab | |
35 | CK | 283 | 87.1efg | 9.25hi |
PA | 285 | 134.2bcd | 7.50i | |
LP | 283 | 105.5def | 16.07bcd | |
BC | 286 | 106.3def | 18.00abc | |
LP+BC | 284 | 67.0fg | 16.97abcd | |
70 | CK | 280 | 131.3bcd | 9.86ghi |
PA | 285 | 168.5ab | 6.89i | |
LP | 283 | 73.1efg | 14.27def | |
BC | 285 | 141.0bcd | 16.87abcd | |
LP+BC | 284 | 149.7bc | 16.64abcd | |
青贮时间 Ensiling time (d) | ||||
3 | 282 | 95.7c | 13.59b | |
7 | 278 | 155.5a | 15.13a | |
35 | 284 | 100.0c | 13.56b | |
70 | 283 | 132.8b | 12.91b | |
添加剂 Additive | ||||
CK | 279 | 107.3cd | 10.80c | |
PA | 285 | 147.4a | 8.04d | |
LP | 283 | 99.0d | 15.41b | |
BC | 279 | 121.7bc | 17.46a | |
LP+BC | 282 | 124.4b | 17.27a | |
标准误Standard error | 1.10 | 5.08 | 0.25 | |
显著性Significance | ||||
添加剂Additive | 0.322 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
青贮时间Ensiling time | 0.204 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
交互作用Interaction | 0.509 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Effects of additive and ensiling time on the dry matter, ammonia nitrogen/total nitrogen and lactic acid/acetic acid of Italian ryegrass silage
青贮时间 Ensiling time (d) | 添加剂 Additive | 干物质 Dry matter (g·kg-1) | 氨态氮/总氮 Ammonia nitrogen/ total nitrogen (g·kg-1 N) | 乳酸/乙酸 Lactic acid/ acetic acid (LA/AA) |
---|---|---|---|---|
3 | CK | 278 | 58.4g | 11.71fgh |
PA | 286 | 83.9efg | 8.79hi | |
LP | 285 | 62.5g | 14.90cde | |
BC | 282 | 111.3cde | 15.57bcd | |
LP+BC | 276 | 162.4b | 16.97abcd | |
7 | CK | 275 | 152.4bc | 12.39efg |
PA | 285 | 202.8a | 8.96hi | |
LP | 281 | 154.4b | 16.41abcd | |
BC | 264 | 138.9bcd | 19.39a | |
LP+BC | 284 | 128.7bcd | 18.49ab | |
35 | CK | 283 | 87.1efg | 9.25hi |
PA | 285 | 134.2bcd | 7.50i | |
LP | 283 | 105.5def | 16.07bcd | |
BC | 286 | 106.3def | 18.00abc | |
LP+BC | 284 | 67.0fg | 16.97abcd | |
70 | CK | 280 | 131.3bcd | 9.86ghi |
PA | 285 | 168.5ab | 6.89i | |
LP | 283 | 73.1efg | 14.27def | |
BC | 285 | 141.0bcd | 16.87abcd | |
LP+BC | 284 | 149.7bc | 16.64abcd | |
青贮时间 Ensiling time (d) | ||||
3 | 282 | 95.7c | 13.59b | |
7 | 278 | 155.5a | 15.13a | |
35 | 284 | 100.0c | 13.56b | |
70 | 283 | 132.8b | 12.91b | |
添加剂 Additive | ||||
CK | 279 | 107.3cd | 10.80c | |
PA | 285 | 147.4a | 8.04d | |
LP | 283 | 99.0d | 15.41b | |
BC | 279 | 121.7bc | 17.46a | |
LP+BC | 282 | 124.4b | 17.27a | |
标准误Standard error | 1.10 | 5.08 | 0.25 | |
显著性Significance | ||||
添加剂Additive | 0.322 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
青贮时间Ensiling time | 0.204 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
交互作用Interaction | 0.509 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
青贮时间 Ensiling time (d) | 添加剂 Additive | 好氧性细菌 Aerobic bacteria | 酵母菌 Yeasts | 霉菌 Mold | 乳酸菌 Lactic acid bacteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | CK | 6.71a | <3.00g | <3.00b | 9.25ab |
PA | 6.52ab | <3.00g | 4.68a | 9.48ab | |
LP | 6.19b | 4.75efg | 4.68a | 9.36ab | |
BC | 6.37ab | 6.31a | <3.00b | 9.33ab | |
LP+BC | 6.54ab | 4.81efg | <3.00b | 9.48ab | |
7 | CK | 6.73a | 5.60bcd | <3.00b | 9.39ab |
PA | 6.62a | 5.06defg | 4.68a | 9.60a | |
LP | 4.83d | 4.68fg | <3.00b | 9.37ab | |
BC | 6.36ab | 5.32cde | 4.72a | 9.10b | |
LP+BC | 4.93d | 4.68fg | <3.00b | 9.14ab | |
35 | CK | 5.51c | 5.88abc | <3.00b | 8.34cd |
PA | 5.65c | 5.52bcd | <3.00b | 8.60c | |
LP | 5.44c | 5.73bc | 4.75a | 9.22ab | |
BC | 5.55c | 5.49bcd | <3.00b | 9.15ab | |
LP+BC | 4.90d | 5.94ab | <3.00b | 9.19ab | |
70 | CK | 4.87d | 4.68fg | 4.68a | 7.92de |
PA | 4.79d | 4.62g | <3.00b | 8.08d | |
LP | 4.72d | 5.00defg | <3.00b | 7.60e | |
BC | 4.60d | 5.04defg | <3.00b | 7.53e | |
LP+BC | 4.87d | 5.28cdef | <3.00b | 7.60e | |
青贮时间 Ensiling time(d) | |||||
3 | 6.47a | 5.02b | 3.43a | 9.38a | |
7 | 5.89b | 5.07b | 3.44a | 9.32a | |
35 | 5.41c | 5.71a | 3.03b | 8.90b | |
70 | 4.77d | 4.92b | 3.02c | 7.75c | |
添加剂 Additive | |||||
CK | 5.95a | 5.19b | 3.12b | 8.72 | |
PA | 5.90ab | 4.95b | 3.64a | 8.94 | |
LP | 5.29c | 5.04b | 3.66a | 8.89 | |
BC | 5.72b | 5.54a | 3.13b | 8.78 | |
LP+BC | 5.31c | 5.18b | <3.00c | 8.85 | |
标准误Standard error | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.08 | |
显著性Significance | |||||
添加剂Additive | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.247 | |
青贮时间Ensiling time | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
交互作用Interaction | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Effects of additive and ensiling time on the microbial composition of Italian ryegrass silage (lg cfu·g-1 FW)
青贮时间 Ensiling time (d) | 添加剂 Additive | 好氧性细菌 Aerobic bacteria | 酵母菌 Yeasts | 霉菌 Mold | 乳酸菌 Lactic acid bacteria |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3 | CK | 6.71a | <3.00g | <3.00b | 9.25ab |
PA | 6.52ab | <3.00g | 4.68a | 9.48ab | |
LP | 6.19b | 4.75efg | 4.68a | 9.36ab | |
BC | 6.37ab | 6.31a | <3.00b | 9.33ab | |
LP+BC | 6.54ab | 4.81efg | <3.00b | 9.48ab | |
7 | CK | 6.73a | 5.60bcd | <3.00b | 9.39ab |
PA | 6.62a | 5.06defg | 4.68a | 9.60a | |
LP | 4.83d | 4.68fg | <3.00b | 9.37ab | |
BC | 6.36ab | 5.32cde | 4.72a | 9.10b | |
LP+BC | 4.93d | 4.68fg | <3.00b | 9.14ab | |
35 | CK | 5.51c | 5.88abc | <3.00b | 8.34cd |
PA | 5.65c | 5.52bcd | <3.00b | 8.60c | |
LP | 5.44c | 5.73bc | 4.75a | 9.22ab | |
BC | 5.55c | 5.49bcd | <3.00b | 9.15ab | |
LP+BC | 4.90d | 5.94ab | <3.00b | 9.19ab | |
70 | CK | 4.87d | 4.68fg | 4.68a | 7.92de |
PA | 4.79d | 4.62g | <3.00b | 8.08d | |
LP | 4.72d | 5.00defg | <3.00b | 7.60e | |
BC | 4.60d | 5.04defg | <3.00b | 7.53e | |
LP+BC | 4.87d | 5.28cdef | <3.00b | 7.60e | |
青贮时间 Ensiling time(d) | |||||
3 | 6.47a | 5.02b | 3.43a | 9.38a | |
7 | 5.89b | 5.07b | 3.44a | 9.32a | |
35 | 5.41c | 5.71a | 3.03b | 8.90b | |
70 | 4.77d | 4.92b | 3.02c | 7.75c | |
添加剂 Additive | |||||
CK | 5.95a | 5.19b | 3.12b | 8.72 | |
PA | 5.90ab | 4.95b | 3.64a | 8.94 | |
LP | 5.29c | 5.04b | 3.66a | 8.89 | |
BC | 5.72b | 5.54a | 3.13b | 8.78 | |
LP+BC | 5.31c | 5.18b | <3.00c | 8.85 | |
标准误Standard error | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.11 | 0.08 | |
显著性Significance | |||||
添加剂Additive | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.247 | |
青贮时间Ensiling time | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
交互作用Interaction | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
1 | Chen T D, Zhao X D, Li Y S, et al. Research progress of nutritional quality and animal feeding of Lolium multiflorum. Feed Research, 2020, 10(43): 146-149. |
陈腾达, 赵晓登, 李玉帅, 等. 多花黑麦草营养品质及在动物饲养方面的研究进展. 饲料研究, 2020, 10(43): 146-149. | |
2 | Yang J. Effects of complex silage additive treatments on fermentation quality of Italian ryegrass silage. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2007. |
杨杰. 复合青贮剂处理对多花黑麦草青贮品质的影响. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2007. | |
3 | Ding C L. Function and cultivation technique of Italian ryegrass in the agriculture system of rural area of South China. Chinese Journal of Rabbit Farming, 2008(11): 15-17. |
丁成龙. 多花黑麦草在南方农区农业结构中的作用及其栽培利用技术. 中国养兔杂志, 2008(11): 15-17. | |
4 | Liu Q H, Li X Y, Li J F, et al. Effect of temperature and additives on fermentation and α-tocopherol and β-carotene content of Pennisetum purpureum silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(7): 116-122. |
刘秦华, 李湘玉, 李君风, 等. 温度和添加剂对象草青贮发酵品质、α-生育酚和β-胡萝卜素的影响. 草业学报, 2015, 24(7): 116-122. | |
5 | Lindqvist H, Nadeau E, Jensen S K. Alpha-tocopherol and β-carotene in legume-grass mixtures as influenced by wilting, ensiling and type of silage additive. Grass & Forage Science, 2012, 67(1): 119-128. |
6 | Nadeau E, Johanssonb B, Jensen S K, et al. Vitamin content of forages as influenced by harvest and ensiling techniques. Grassland and Science in Europe, 2004, 9(1): 891-893. |
7 | Zhang Y X, Ke W C, Bal J, et al. The effect of Pediococcus acidilactici J17 with high-antioxidant activity on antioxidant, α-tocopherol, β-carotene, fatty acids, and fermentation profiles of alfalfa silage ensiled at two different dry matter contents. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2020, 268: 114614. |
8 | Liu Q H, Wu J X, Shao T. Roles of microbes and lipolytic enzymes in changing the fatty acid profile, α-tocopherol and β-carotene of whole-crop oat silages during ensiling and after exposure to air. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2019, 253(48): 81-92. |
9 | Zong C, Zhang J, Shao T, et al. Effects of additives on fermentation quality of alfalfa silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(12): 180-187. |
宗成, 张健, 邵涛, 等. 添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮饲料发酵品质的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29(12): 180-187. | |
10 | Susanti E. Production optimization and cellulose system characterization of Bacillus circulans local strain using inducer avicel. Jurnal Ilmu Dasar, 2012, 12(1): 40-49. |
11 | Aamod A N, Sharad L, Shilpa P, et al. Evaluation of Bacillus circulans in imparting aerobic stability to silage. International Journal of Modern Science and Technology, 2017, 2(12): 391-396. |
12 | Xiao S H, Yuan X J, Dong Z H, et al. Effects of inoculant and molasses additives on fermentation quality of mixed silages of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2016, 39(6): 1017-1022. |
肖慎华, 原现军, 董志浩, 等. 添加乳酸菌制剂和糖蜜对箭筈豌豆和苇状羊茅混合青贮发酵品质的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2016, 39(6): 1017-1022. | |
13 | Zhu J G, Zhang J, Shao T, et al. The effects of additives on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of whole-plant oat silage. Acta Agrestia Sincia, 2020, 28(6): 1756-1761. |
朱九刚, 张健, 邵涛, 等. 添加剂对全株燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1756-1761. | |
14 | Guo H M, Xia T C, Zhu W, et al. Effect of additives on the quality and aerobic stability of rice straw silage. Acta Prataculturae Sincia, 2017, 26(2): 190-196. |
郭海明, 夏天婵, 朱雯, 等. 青贮添加剂对稻草青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响. 草业学报, 2017, 26(2): 190-196. | |
15 | Liu Q H, Zhang J G, Lu X L. The effects of lactic acid bacteria inoculation on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of king grass silage. Acta Prataculturae Sincia, 2009, 18(4): 131-137. |
刘秦华, 张建国, 卢小良. 乳酸菌添加剂对王草青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性的影响. 草业学报, 2009, 18(4): 131-137. | |
16 | Liu Q H, Li X Y, Seare T D, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus plantarum and fibrolytic enzyme on the fermentation quality and in vitro digestibility of total mixed rations silage including rape straw. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2016, 15(9): 2087-2096. |
17 | Zhang Z X, Shao T. The effect of propionic acid addition on the dynamic fermentation changes of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) silage. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2009, 18(2): 102-107. |
张增欣, 邵涛. 丙酸对多花黑麦草青贮发酵动态变化的影响. 草业学报, 2009, 18(2): 102-107. | |
18 | Hou M L, Du Z M, Fan W Q, et al. The effects of treating with lactic acid bacteria and cellulase on silage fermentation of natural grasses in meadow steppe. Acta Veterinaria et Zootechnica Sinica, 2017, 48(5): 871-880. |
侯美玲, 杜珠梅, 范文强, 等. 乳酸菌与纤维素酶对草甸草原天然牧草青贮品质的影响. 畜牧兽医学报, 2017, 48(5): 871-880. | |
19 | Sun X L, Jian F C, Xu L P, et al. Effects of Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus plantarum on the quality of silage sorghum. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2021, 57(9): 159-163. |
孙向丽, 菅复春, 许来鹏, 等. 布氏乳杆菌和植物乳杆菌对高粱青贮品质的影响. 中国畜牧杂志, 2021, 57(9): 159-163. | |
20 | Kalac P. Carotenoids, ergosterol and tocopherols in fresh and preserved herbage and their transfer to bovine milk fat and adipose tissues: A review. Journal of Agrobiology, 2012, 29(1): 1-13. |
21 | Dunne P G, Monahan F, O’Mara F P, et al. Colour of bovine subcutaneous adipose tissue: A review of contributory factors, associations with carcass and meat quality and its potential utility in authentication of dietary history. Meat Science, 2009, 81(1): 28-45. |
[1] | Dong-qing FU, Chun-ying JIA, Li ZHANG, Fan-fan ZHANG, Chun-hui MA. Agronomic traits and fermentation quality of maize silage harvested at different grain-development stages in irrigated drought areas of southern Xinjiang [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(8): 111-125. |
[2] | Ying-zheng LI, Yu-lin CHENG, Lu-lu XU, Wan-song LI, Xu YAN, Xiao-feng LI, Ru-yu HE, Yang ZHOU, Jun-jun ZHENG, Xing-yu WANG, De-long ZHANG, Ming-jun CHENG, Yun-hong XIA, Jian-mei HE, Qi-lin TANG. A comparative study of silage quality characteristics of whole-plant, whole-ear and whole-straw silage of different maize varieties (lines) [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(8): 144-156. |
[3] | Yong-jie WU, Hao DING, Tao SHAO, Jie ZHAO, Dong DONG, Tong-tong DAI, Xue-jing YIN, Cheng ZONG, Jun-feng LI. Effects of enzyme additives on fermentation quality and in vitro digestion characteristics of rice straw silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(8): 167-177. |
[4] | Jun-feng LI, Jie ZHAO, Xiao-yue TANG, Tong-tong DAI, Dong DONG, Cheng ZONG, Tao SHAO. Effect of a rumen cellulolytic microbial consortium on the degradation of structural carbohydrate in sterile rice straw silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(7): 85-95. |
[5] | Xiang GUO, Shuo WU, Ming-yang ZHENG, De-kui CHEN, Xuan ZOU, Xiao-yang CHEN, Wei ZHOU, Qing ZHANG. Effects of addition of Neolamarckia cadamba leaves and chitosan oligosaccharides on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of sugarcane top silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6): 202-210. |
[6] | Di ZHOU, Shuai YANG, Xin-xin ZHANG, Jing YUAN, Yan-xia GAO, Jian-guo LI, Bo WANG, Guang-sheng ZHOU, Ting-dong FU, Jun YE, Li-guo YANG, Guo-hua HUA. Effects of additive types and combinations on silage quality of whole-plant rape after harvesting and air-drying [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 124-135. |
[7] | Huan ZHANG, Yi-xiao MU, Gui-jie ZHANG. Effects of Lycium barbarum by-products on fermentation quality and microbial diversity of alfalfa silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(4): 136-144. |
[8] | Hai-ping LI, Hao GUAN, Zhi-feng JIA, Wen-hui LIU, Xiang MA, Yong LIU, Hui WANG, Li MA, Qing-ping ZHOU. Screening of antifreeze-thawed lactic acid bacteria and their effects on oat silage fermentation quality and aerobic stability [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(12): 158-170. |
[9] | Ting WANG, Lei SONG, Xu-zhe WANG, Chun-hui MA, Bao-jun DU, Fan-fan ZHANG. Effect of compound Lactobacillus and mixture ratio on fermentation quality and rumen degradability of mixed tomato pomace and alfalfa silage mixed storage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(10): 167-177. |
[10] | Juan-shan ZHENG, KAO Ren-qing DING, Xin-pu LI, Ze-yi LIANG, Jian-bo ZHANG, Mei DU, Xue-zhi DING. Research progress on rumen microorganisms in the utilization of lignocellulose as an energy resource [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(9): 182-192. |
[11] | Dong-mei YANG, Jun-nian LI, Shuang-lun TAO. Effects of tannic acid addition on the aerobic stability and mycotoxin content of kudzu vine silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 164-170. |
[12] | Xiang GUO, De-kui CHEN, Na CHEN, Yun LI, Xiao-yang CHEN, Qing ZHANG. Effect of moisture content and additives on the fermentation quality of Neolamarckia cadamba leaf silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 199-205. |
[13] | Shi-yu ZOU, Si-kui CHEN, Qi-yuan TANG, Dong CHEN, Yuan-wei CHEN, Pan DENG, Xu-lai HUANG, Fu-qiang LI. Effects of silage additives on quality and in vitro rumen fermentation characteristics of first season ratoon rice whole silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 122-132. |
[14] | Xiang YIN, Yong-qi WANG, Xin-qin LI, Jing TIAN, Xiao-ya WANG, Jian-guo ZHANG. Effects of various moisture-absorbing roughages on the fermentation quality and aerobic stability of napier grass silage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(7): 133-138. |
[15] | Yi XIAO, Zhong-fu YANG, Gang NIE, Jia-ting HAN, Yang SHUAI, Xin-quan ZHANG. Multi-trait evaluation of yield and nutritive value of 12 Lolium multiflorum varieties or lines in Chengdu Plain [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 174-185. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||