不同藜麦材料在哈尔滨地区的适应性研究

doi:10.11686/cyxb2019190

草业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (9): 202-208.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2019190

不同藜麦材料在哈尔滨地区的适应性研究

李佶恺¹, 王建丽¹, 尚晨¹, 张海玲¹, 刘杰淋¹, 陈积山¹, 潘多锋¹, 刘凯²

1.黑龙江省农业科学院草业研究所,黑龙江哈尔滨 150086;
2.黑龙江省农业科学院,黑龙江哈尔滨 150086

收稿日期:2019-03-14 修回日期:2019-06-05 出版日期:2019-09-20 发布日期:2019-09-20
作者简介:李佶恺(1982-),女,黑龙江七台河人,助理研究员,博士。E-mail: ljk8699466@163.com
基金资助:
国家农业部物种品种资源保护费项目(131821301354051002),黑龙江省农业科学院院级科研项目和黑龙江省农业科学院科研重大项目黑龙江寒带农作物种质资源更新资助

Adaptability of different quinoa germplasm lines in Harbin

LI Ji-kai¹, WANG Jian-li¹, SHANG Chen¹, ZHANG Hai-ling¹, LIU Jie-lin¹, CHEN Ji-shan¹, PAN Duo-feng¹, LIU Kai²

1.Grass and Science Institute of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China;
2.Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Harbin 150086, China

Received:2019-03-14 Revised:2019-06-05 Online:2019-09-20 Published:2019-09-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在哈尔滨地区的生态及生产条件下,研究了8个藜麦材料在大田种植条件下的农艺性状、品质性状及抗倒伏表现。结果表明:8个参试材料均可在本生态区正常成熟,生育期范围为112~121 d。株高范围为133.20~173.07 cm,分枝数为18.10~23.10个,有效分枝率为64.34%~72.87%,产量最高可达2965.88 kg·hm^-2。蛋白质含量为13.74%~14.50%,淀粉含量为42.15%~60.11%,脂肪含量为4.26%~6.74%,灰分含量为3.94%~6.46%。倒伏率为9.00%~13.67%。综合产量性状和品质性状,材料LM-3的表现最优,适合在哈尔滨地区推广应用。

关键词: 藜麦, 哈尔滨, 农艺性状, 品质性状, 倒伏

Abstract: This paper researched the agronomic traits, seed quality traits and lodging resistance of eight quinoa germplasm lines in Harbin, Heilongjiang Province. All the eight tested lines matured normally, with the growth period ranging from 112 to 121 days. The plant height ranged from 133.2 to 173.1 cm, the number of branches per plant was 18.1-23.1, the effective branching rate was 64.34%-72.87%, and the highest yield among the quinoa lines at Harbin was 2966 kg·ha^-1. The ranges for protein, starch, and fat contents were, respectively, 13.74%-14.50%, 42.15%-60.11%, and 4.26%-6.74%, and the range for ash was 3.94%-6.46%. The lodging rate was between 9.00%-13.67%. Based on comprehensive consideration of evaluated yield and seed quality traits, the germplasm line LM-3 had the best performance, and production potential. This material is therefore recommended as suitable to be planted more widely in the Harbin region.

Key words: quinoa, Harbin, agronomic traits, quality traits, lodging

李佶恺, 王建丽, 尚晨, 张海玲, 刘杰淋, 陈积山, 潘多锋, 刘凯. 不同藜麦材料在哈尔滨地区的适应性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 202-208.

LI Ji-kai, WANG Jian-li, SHANG Chen, ZHANG Hai-ling, LIU Jie-lin, CHEN Ji-shan, PAN Duo-feng, LIU Kai. Adaptability of different quinoa germplasm lines in Harbin[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(9): 202-208.

参考文献

[1] Jacobsen S E.The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Reviews International, 2003, 19(1/2): 167-177.
[2] Bhargava A, Shukla S, Ohri D.Chenopodium quinoa-an Indian perspective. Industrial Crops and Products, 2006, 23(1): 73-87.
[3] Zhang C X, Gongbu Z X, Wang M.Experimental study on cold damage of seedlings in quinoa. Tibet Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 1994, 16(4): 49-54.
张崇玺, 贡布扎西, 旺姆. 南美黎(Quinoa)苗期低温冻害试验研究. 西藏农业科技, 1994, 16(4): 49-54.
[4] Ren G X, Yang X S, Yao Y.Current situation of quinoa industry in China. Crops, 2015, (5): 1-5.
任贵兴, 杨修仕, 么杨. 中国藜麦产业现状. 作物杂志, 2015, (5): 1-5.
[5] Wright K H, Pike O A, Fairbanks D J, et al. Composition of Atriplex hortensis, sweet and bitter Chenopodium quinoa seeds. Journal of Food Science, 2002, 67(4): 1383-1385.
[6] Abugoch J L E. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): Composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, 2009, 58(9): 1-31.
[7] Vega-Gálvez A, Miranda M, Vergara J, et al. Nutrition facts and functional potential of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.), an ancient Andean grain: A review. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2010, 90(15): 2541-2547.
[8] Repo-Carrasco R, Espinoza C, Jacobsen S E.Nutritional value and use of the andean crops quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) and kañiwa (Chenopodium pallidicaule). Food Reviews International, 2003, 19(1/2): 179-189.
[9] Alvarezl-Jubete L, Wijngaard H, Gallagher E.Nutritive value of pseudocereals and their increasing use as functional gluten-free ingredients. Trends in Food Science &Technology, 2010, 21: 106-113.
[10] Pasko P, Barton H, Zagrodzki P, et al. Effect of diet supplemented with quinoa seeds on oxidative status in plasma and selected tissues of high fructose-fed rats. Plant Foods Human Nutrition, 2010, 65(2): 146-151.
[11] Meneguetti Q A, Brenzan M A, Batista M R, et al. Biological effects of hydrolyzed quinoa extract from seeds of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Journal Medicinal Food, 2011, 14(6): 653-657.
[12] Eestrada A, Li B, Laarveld B.Adjuvant action of Chenopodium quinoa saponins on the induction of antibody responses to intragastric and intranasal administered antigens in mice. Comparative Immunology Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 1998, 21(3): 225-236.
[13] Hirose Y, Fujita T, Ishill T, et al. Antioxidative properties and flavonoid composition of Chenopodium quinoa seeds cultivated in Japan. Food Chemistry, 2010, 119(4): 1300-1306.
[14] González J A, Gallardo M, Hilal M, et al. Physiological responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought and water logging stresses: Dry matter partitioning. Botanical Studies, 2009, 50(1): 35-42.
[15] Jacobsen S E, Monteros C, Corcuera L J, et al. Frost resistance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). European Journal of Agronomy, 2007, 26(4): 471-475.
[16] Jensen C R, Jacobsen S E, Andersen M N, et al. Leaf gas exchange and water relation characteristics of field quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) during soil drying. European Journal of Agronomy, 2000, 13(1): 11-25.
[17] Zhou H T, Liu H, Yao Y, et al. Evaluation of agronomic and quality characters of quinoa cultivated in Zhangjiakou. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2014, 15(1): 222-227.
周海涛, 刘浩, 么杨, 等. 藜麦在张家口地区试种的表现与评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 2014, 15(1): 222-227.
[18] Huang J, Yang F R, Li M Q, et al. Preliminary evaluation of adaptability of 13 quinoa varieties in the Linxia arid region of Gansu Province, China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(3): 191-201.
黄杰, 杨发荣, 李敏权, 等. 13个藜麦材料在甘肃临夏旱作区适应性的初步评价. 草业学报, 2016, 25(3): 191-201.
[19] Li C H, Ma W L, Cui J R, et al. Preliminary report on the planting performance of several quinoa varieties in Haiyuan of Ningxia Province. China Agricultural Technology Extension, 2019, 35(2): 20-21.
李成虎, 马维亮, 崔建荣, 等. 多个藜麦品种在宁夏海原的种植表现初报. 中国农技推广, 2019, 35(2): 20-21.
[20] Chen Z H, Shi M, Wang Q X, et al. Determination of protein content in food by using the method of the determination of the nitrogen. Xinjiang Animal Husbandry, 2008, (5): 22-24.
陈智慧, 史梅, 王秋香, 等. 用凯氏定氮法测定食品中的蛋白质含量. 新疆畜牧业, 2008, (5): 22-24.
[21] Zhao T N, Meng G Q.Determination of crude starch in cereals seeds, GB5006-85. Beijing: Standarzation Administration, 1985.
赵铁男, 孟广勤. 谷物籽粒粗淀粉测定法, GB5006-85. 北京: 国家标准局, 1985.
[22] Zhang J X, Hao X C, Wu C H.Inspect of grain and oils determination of crude fat content in grain, GB/T 5512-2008.Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2009.
张佳欣, 郝希成, 吴春华. 粮油检验粮食中粗脂肪含量测定, GB/T 5512-2008. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009.
[23] Guo Q, Shang Y E, Fan O, et al.Inspect of grain and oils determination of the ash content by incineration, GB/T 5505-2008. Beijing:Standards Press of China, 2008.
呙琴, 尚艳娥, 范鸥, 等. 粮油检验灰分测定法, GB/T 5505-2008. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[24] Zhang L Y.Feed analysis and feed quality testing technology (Version 3).Beijing:China Agricultural University Press, 2009: 140-149.
张丽英.饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术(第3版). 北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2009: 140-149.

不同藜麦材料在哈尔滨地区的适应性研究

Adaptability of different quinoa germplasm lines in Harbin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	于晓波, 梁建秋, 何泽民, 周全卢, 吴海英, 张明荣. 撒播量对大豆茎秆特性和产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 117-124.
[2]	再吐尼古丽·库尔班, 吐尔逊·吐尔洪, 涂振东, 王卉, 山其米克, 艾克拜尔·伊拉洪. 长期不同施肥处理对连作高粱生长规律及产量的影响研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 81-92.
[3]	赵颖, 魏小红, 李桃桃. 外源NO对混合盐碱胁迫下藜麦种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 92-101.
[4]	李亚娇, 马培杰, 吴佳海, 牟琼, 覃涛英, 王晓强, 马宁, 张蓉, 李德芳, 朗永祥, 吴有松, 田应学, 韩永芬. 不同品种青贮玉米与拉巴豆套种对青贮玉米农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 209-216.
[5]	刘晓, 王博, 朱晓艳, 郭晓洁, 王成章, 李德锋. 21个粮饲兼用型青贮玉米在河南的品种比较试验[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(8): 49-60.
[6]	梁国玲, 张永超, 贾志锋, 马祥, 刘文辉. 高寒区不同燕麦品种(系)表型性状和茎秆力学特征与抗倒伏性的关系研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(4): 58-69.
[7]	赵颖, 魏小红, 赫亚龙, 赵枭飞, 韩厅, 岳凯, 辛夏青, 宿梅飞, 马文静, 骆巧娟. 混合盐碱胁迫对藜麦种子萌发和幼苗抗氧化特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(2): 156-167.
[8]	任胜茂, 邓榆川, 文凤君, 刘明洁, 袁小琴, SajadHussain, 蒲全明, 刘卫国, 杨文钰. 套作对大豆苗期碳氮物质代谢的影响及其与抗倒伏性的关系[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(9): 85-94.
[9]	赵小强, 方鹏, 彭云玲, 张金文, 曾文静, 任斌, 高巧红. 基于两个相关群体的玉米7个主要农艺性状遗传分析和QTL定位[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(9): 152-165.
[10]	张大众, 刘佳佳, 屈洋, 梁鸡保, 张霞, 韩雅利, 冯佰利. 新型拌种剂对谷子生长及白发病发生的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(9): 141-147.
[11]	杨宏伟, 刘文瑜, 沈宝云, 李朝周. NaCl胁迫对藜麦种子萌发和幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(8): 146-153.
[12]	贺春贵, 何振富, 王斐. 光敏型高丹草复种穴播高效栽培模式研究[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(5): 70-80.
[13]	杨发荣, 刘文瑜, 黄杰, 魏玉明, 金茜. 不同藜麦品种对盐胁迫的生理响应及耐盐性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(12): 77-88.
[14]	漆永红, 岳德成, 曹素芳, 李敏权. 全膜双垄沟播玉米土壤含水率和温度及杂草去除效应[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(11): 176-184.
[15]	吴海军, 杨才琼, Nasir Iqbal, 邓俊才, 戴炜, 刘卫国, 杨峰, 舒凯, 杜俊波, 杨文钰, 刘江. 日本大豆引种四川盆地的品质评价研究[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(1): 81-89.