祁连山高寒草原土壤水分与植被盖度的关系

doi:10.11686/cyxb2020015

草业学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (11): 23-32.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020015

祁连山高寒草原土壤水分与植被盖度的关系

陆丰帅^1,2, 阿的鲁骥^1,2, 程云湘³, 侯扶江^1,2,*

1.草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室,兰州大学草地农业科技学院,甘肃兰州 730020;
2.农业部草牧业创新重点实验室,甘肃兰州 730020;
3.内蒙古大学生态与环境学院,内蒙古呼和浩特 010021

收稿日期:2020-01-17 修回日期:2020-04-28 出版日期:2020-11-20 发布日期:2020-11-20
通讯作者: *E-mail: cyhoufj@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:陆丰帅(1996-),女,山东沂水人,在读硕士。E-mail: lufsh18@lzu.edu.cn

Relationship between soil moisture and vegetation cover in Qilian Mountain alpine steppe

LU Feng-shuai^1,2, ADE Lu-ji^1,2, CHENG Yun-xiang³, HOU Fu-jiang^1,2,*

1. State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Grassland Livestock Industry Innovation, Ministry of Agriculture, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China;
3. School of Ecology and Environment, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010021, China

Received:2020-01-17 Revised:2020-04-28 Online:2020-11-20 Published:2020-11-20
Contact: *E-mail: cyhoufj@lzu.edu.cn
Supported by:
祁连山山地-荒漠-绿洲系统耦合模式研究(XDA20100102)和长江学者和创新团队发展计划(IRT_17R50)资助

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了揭示高寒草原土壤水分与植被盖度的关系,提高植被盖度与土壤水分快测的精度,本研究在祁连山北麓中段高寒草原—甘肃马鹿冬季牧场,设置放牧率分别为1.00、1.45、2.45、3.45、4.85、6.90 AUM·hm^-2的6个样地,通过逐月测定生长季植被盖度和土壤水分,结合Landsat5多光谱影像与SPOT2全色影像融合而成的SPOT-TM影像,分析土壤水分与植被盖度、归一化植被指数(NDVI)的关系,并在此基础上,确定植被盖度随土壤水分的变化阶段。除醉马草、银灰旋花、乳白黄耆外,其他种群盖度对表层土壤水分均响应敏感,在3%~7%至17%~26%的土壤水分范围内,种群盖度随土壤水分的增加呈反比例函数递增趋势,且增幅逐渐缩小;群落盖度对表层土壤水分的响应敏感,在1.1%~10.0%的土壤水分范围内,群落盖度随土壤水分的增加亦呈反比例函数递增趋势,并逐渐趋于饱和。研究结果对探讨干旱半干旱草原植被物种、种群、群落的抗旱性、水分利用效率具有一定意义,为草原植被和土壤水分管理提供科学依据。

关键词: 种群, 群落演替, 不喜食牧草, 归一化植被指数, 放牧率

Abstract: This study investigated the relationship between soil moisture and vegetation cover in alpine steppe meadow in the Qilian Mountains with the aim of improving the precision of remote sensing estimates of soil moisture and vegetation cover. Six sample areas with different stocking rates of Cervus elaphus kansuensis (1.00, 1.45, 2.45, 3.45, 4.85, 6.90 AUM·ha^-1) in were set up, AUM means animal unit. Through comparing data from monthly field measurement of vegetation cover and soil moisture and SPOT-TM images combining Landsat5 multispectral images and SPOT2 panchromatic images, we analyzed the relationship between soil moisture, vegetation cover and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and quantitatively explored the dynamics of seasonal change in vegetation cover and soil moisture in the sample areas in the Qilian Mountain alpine steppe. Except for Achnatherum inebrians, Convolvulus ammannii and Stragalus leucocephalus, the response of population cover to surface soil moisture was relatively sensitive, with the population cover of species inversely proportional to soil moisture in the range between c. 5% and c. 25%. The response of plant community cover to surface soil moisture was also relatively sensitive. In the soil moisture range from 10.0% to 1.1%, the community cover increased in the inverse proportional function. The results are highly relevant to remote sensing monitoring of the drought resistance and water use efficiency of plant species, populations and communities in arid and semi-arid steppe grassland, and provide scientific data for vegetation and soil moisture management in steppe grasslands.

Key words: population, community succession, undesirable plant, NDVI, grazing rate

陆丰帅, 阿的鲁骥, 程云湘, 侯扶江. 祁连山高寒草原土壤水分与植被盖度的关系[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 23-32.

LU Feng-shuai, ADE Lu-ji, CHENG Yun-xiang, HOU Fu-jiang. Relationship between soil moisture and vegetation cover in Qilian Mountain alpine steppe[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(11): 23-32.

参考文献

[1] Shen H H, Zhu Y K, Zhao X, et al. Analysis of current grassland resources in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(2): 139-154.
沈海花, 朱言坤, 赵霞, 等. 中国草地资源的现状分析. 科学通报, 2016, 61(2): 139-154.
[2] Hu J, Lü Y H, Zhang K, et al. The differences of water conservation function under typical vegetation types in the Pailugou Catchment, Qilian Mountain, Northwest China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(11): 3338-3349.
胡健, 吕一河, 张琨, 等. 祁连山排露沟流域典型植被类型的水源涵养功能差异. 生态学报, 2016, 36(11): 3338-3349.
[3] Wang J Q, Han L, Liu W Y, et al. Variable relationship of soil moisture and spatial pattern along desert oasis transition zone in the Tarim River middle reaches basin. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33(1): 1-10.
王家强, 韩路, 柳维扬, 等. 塔里木河中游荒漠绿洲过渡带土壤水分与植被空间格局变化关系研究. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33(1): 1-10.
[4] Zhang J X, Zhang B, Zhang H, et al. Landscape pattern change and soil erosion research——Take malian river basin in Loess Plateau as an example. Journal of Natural Resources, 2011, 26(9): 1513-1525.
张建香, 张勃, 张华, 等. 黄土高原的景观格局变化与水土流失研究——以黄土高原马莲河流域为例. 自然资源学报, 2011, 26(9): 1513-1525.
[5] Xie H H, Fan J, Hao M D, et al. Effects of soil surface mulching on the water use of artificial grassland in the water-wind erosion crisscross region of the Loess Plateau. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2010, 18(2): 172-176, 182.
谢慧慧, 樊军, 郝明德, 等. 地表覆盖对黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区人工草地水分利用的影响. 草地学报, 2010, 18(2): 172-176, 182.
[6] Wang M M, Liu X P, Li Y L, et al. Soil moisture dynamic under different plant coverages in sandy grassland during growing season. Journal of Desert Research, 2019, 39(5): 54-61.
王明明, 刘新平, 李玉霖, 等. 不同植被盖度沙质草地生长季土壤水分动态. 中国沙漠, 2019, 39(5): 54-61.
[7] Shi L L, Zhao C Z, Fan J P, et al. Spatial patterns of soil moisture and vegetation coverage in Melica przewalskyi patches in degraded alpine grassland of Qilian Mountains, Northwest China. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(2): 285-291.
史丽丽, 赵成章, 樊洁平, 等. 祁连山地甘肃臭草斑块土壤水分与植被盖度空间格局. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(2): 285-291.
[8] Wu J, Liu M S, Li W T. Research on vegetation coverage information extraction technologies for arid and semiarid area. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2013, 27(9): 92-97.
吴见, 刘民士, 李伟涛. 干旱半干旱区植被盖度信息提取技术研究. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013, 27(9): 92-97.
[9] Chen J J, Yi S H, Ren S L, et al. Retrieval of fractional vegetation cover of alpine grassland and the efficiency of remote sensing retrieval in the upper of Shule River Basin. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(1): 56-65.
陈建军, 宜树华, 任世龙, 等. 疏勒河上游高寒草地植被盖度反演及精度评价. 草业科学, 2014, 31(1): 56-65.
[10] Jin J Y, Zhang W H, Yuan L. Physiological responses of three forages to drought stress and evaluation of their drought resistance. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(10): 157-165.
靳军英, 张卫华, 袁玲. 三种牧草对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价. 草业学报, 2015, 24(10): 157-165.
[11] Luo D, Wang M J, Li Y H, et al. Four legumes response to simulated drought in the stages of seed germination and seedling growth and drought resistance assessment. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(2): 224-230.
罗冬, 王明玖, 李元恒, 等. 四种豆科牧草种子萌发和幼苗生长对干旱的响应及抗旱性评价. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(2): 224-230.
[12] Su R G G, Sun T J, Wu J Y, et al. Effect of drought stress on characteristics of drought resistance of grasses during seedling stage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007, 29(3): 56-60.
苏日古嘎, 孙铁军, 武菊英, 等. 干旱胁迫对禾草苗期抗旱性特征的影响. 中国草地学报, 2007, 29(3): 56-60.
[13] Hu J Q, Chen X J, Hou F J. The response of plant community characteristics of alpine steppe to the winter grazing of Gansu Wapiti. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(6): 1028-1034.
胡俊奇, 陈先江, 侯扶江. 高寒草原群落特征对甘肃马鹿冬季放牧的响应. 草业科学, 2016, 33(6): 1028-1034.
[14] Zhang Y, Chen X J, Cheng Y X, et al. Effects of stocking rates on functional group diversity and forage quality in rangeland of Qilian Mountain China. Journal of Environmental Biology, 2015, 36(4): 713-719.
[15] Hou F J, Li G, Yang F G. Grazing behavior of Gansu Wapiti (Cervus elaphus kansuensis) in summer & winter on the alpine grasslands of Qilianshan Mountain. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(9): 1807-1815.
侯扶江, 李广, 杨逢刚. 甘肃马鹿夏冬季在祁连山高山草地的放牧行为. 生态学报, 2003, 23(9): 1807-1815.
[16] Chai L R, Sun Y, Wang H, et al. Effect of yak grazing intensity on characteristics of plant communities and forage quality in Gannan Alpine Meadow. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(1): 18-26.
柴林荣, 孙义, 王宏, 等. 牦牛放牧强度对甘南高寒草甸群落特征与牧草品质的影响. 草业科学, 2018, 35(1): 18-26.
[17] Sun Z H, Liu Z C, Lei Y P. The variations of NDVI and the relation with climate in hilly and gully region of Northern Yan’an. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(2): 533-540.
[18] Li W L, Li Z Z, Wang G, et al. Analysis on water utility of artificial sand fixing plants and its numerical simulation of the procedure of niche fitness in Shapotou Area. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2004, (6): 1012-1017.
李文龙, 李自珍, 王刚, 等. 沙坡头地区人工固沙植物水分利用及其生态位适宜度过程数值模拟分析. 西北植物学报, 2004, (6): 1012-1017.
[19] Huang D Q, Yu L, Zhang Y S, et al. Influence of meteorological factors on the dynamic changes of soil moisture of natural grassland in the northern slopes of the Mountains Qilian. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2011, 29(3): 233-239.
黄德青, 于兰, 张耀生, 等. 气象因子对祁连山北坡天然草地土壤水分动态变化的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011, 29(3): 233-239.
[20] Zhao X J, Tian K, Yue H T. Growth stress of Scirpus tabernaemontani of dominant plant in plateau wetland lakeshore to water level fluctuating. Guihaia, 2015, 35(3): 303-308.
赵湘江, 田昆, 岳海涛. 水位变化对高原湿地湖滨带优势植物水葱的生长胁迫. 广西植物, 2015, 35(3): 303-308.
[21] Wang X, Yang L, Zhao Q, et al. Spatial heterogeneity and environmental drivers of grassland community functional traits in the semi-arid loess small watershed. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(9): 2201-2211.
王鑫, 杨磊, 赵倩, 等. 半干旱黄土小流域草地群落功能性状空间异质性及环境驱动. 草业科学, 2019, 36(9): 2201-2211.
[22] Zhao M Y, Zhao W W, Liu Y X. Comparative analysis of soil particle size distribution and its influence factors in different scales: A case study in the Loess Hilly-gully area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(14): 4625-4632.
赵明月, 赵文武, 刘源鑫. 不同尺度下土壤粒径分布特征及其影响因子——以黄土丘陵沟壑区为例. 生态学报, 2015, 35(14): 4625-4632.
[23] Gao J B, Jiao K W, Wu S H. Revealing the climatic impacts on spatial heterogeneity of NDVI in China during 1982-2013. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74(3): 534-543.
高江波, 焦珂伟, 吴绍洪. 1982-2013年中国植被NDVI空间异质性的气候影响分析. 地理学报, 2019, 74(3): 534-543.
[24] Wei H L, Sun Z J, Jin G L, et al. Effect of water stress simulated by PEG on seed germination of Achnatherum inebriants (Hance) Keng. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(26): 22-26.
位海玲, 孙宗玖, 靳瑰丽, 等. PEG模拟水分胁迫对新疆醉马草种子萌发的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(26): 22-26.
[25] Shen G S, Zhang M H, Xia Q, et al. Influence of deer grazing on plant community structure and species diversity. Journal of Domestic Animal Ecology, 2009, 30(3): 86-90.
沈广爽, 张明海, 夏茜, 等. 放牧鹿科动物对植物群落结构及物种多样性的影响. 家畜生态学报, 2009, 30(3): 86-90.
[26] Wu Z, Peng Z C, Hou F J. Response of main plant population pattern to winter grazing in alpine steppe of the Qilian Mountains. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(21): 8010-8020.
武哲, 彭泽晨, 侯扶江. 祁连山高寒草原主要植物种群格局对冬季放牧的响应. 生态学报, 2019, 39(21): 8010-8020.
[27] Dong Q M, Zhao X Q, Ma Y S, et al. Influence of grazing on biomass, growth ratio and compensatory effect of different plant groups in Kobresia parva meadow. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(9): 2640-2650.
董全民, 赵新全, 马玉寿, 等. 放牧对小嵩草草甸生物量及不同植物类群生长率和补偿效应的影响. 生态学报, 2012, 32(9): 2640-2650.
[28] Ding X H, Gong L, Wang D B, et al. Grazing effects on eco-stoichiometry of plant and soil in Hulunbeir, Inner Mogolia. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(15): 4722-4730.
丁小慧, 宫立, 王东波, 等. 放牧对呼伦贝尔草地植物和土壤生态化学计量学特征的影响. 生态学报, 2012, 32(15): 4722-4730.
[29] Li Y, Wang Q, Liu G Y, et al. Responses of four ground cover plants to drought stress and the comprehensive evaluation on drought resistance capacity. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2019, 39(6): 9-15.
李艳, 王庆, 刘国宇, 等. 4种地被植物干旱胁迫下的生理响应及抗旱性评价. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(6): 9-15.
[30] Hu H G, Zhang Z M, Wu S C, et al. Advance of research on water use efficiency of plant and its mechanism. Water Saving Irrigation, 2013, (3): 11-15.
胡化广, 张振铭, 吴生才, 等. 植物水分利用效率及其机理研究进展. 节水灌溉, 2013, (3): 11-15.
[31] Xia J B. Critical responses of photosynthetic efficiency in Campsis radicans (L.) seem to soil water and light intensities. African Journal of Biotechnology, 2011, 10(77): 17748-17754.
[32] Xia J B, Zhang S Y, Zhao Z G, et al. Critical effect of photosynthetic efficiency in Salix matsudana to soil moisture and its threshold grade in shell ridge island. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2013, 37(9): 851-860.
夏江宝, 张淑勇, 赵自国, 等. 贝壳堤岛旱柳光合效率的土壤水分临界效应及其阈值分级. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(9): 851-860.
[33] Liang T G, Feng Q S, Huang X D, et al. Review in the study of comprehensive sequential classification system of grassland. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(5): 252-258.
梁天刚, 冯琦胜, 黄晓东, 等. 草原综合顺序分类系统研究进展. 草业学报, 2011, 20(5): 252-258.
[34] Wen L, Song T Q, Du H, et al. The succession characteristics and its driving mechanism of plant community in karst region, Southwest China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(17): 5822-5833.
文丽, 宋同清, 杜虎, 等. 中国西南喀斯特植物群落演替特征及驱动机制. 生态学报, 2015, 35(17): 5822-5833.

祁连山高寒草原土壤水分与植被盖度的关系

Relationship between soil moisture and vegetation cover in Qilian Mountain alpine steppe

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	张灵菲, 卫万荣, 石高宇, 张卫国. 高寒草甸植物群落结构对高原鼠兔种群密度的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(3): 93-100.
[2]	聂明鹤, 沈艳, 饶丽仙. 宁夏典型草原区退耕草地群落演替序列与环境解释[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(8): 11-20.
[3]	杨帆, 邵全琴, 郭兴健, 李愈哲, 王东亮, 张雅娴, 汪阳春, 刘纪远, 樊江文. 玛多县大型野生食草动物种群数量对草畜平衡的影响研究[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(7): 1-13.
[4]	罗文蓉, 栗文瀚, 干珠扎布, 闫玉龙, 李钰, 曹旭娟, 何世丞, 旦久罗布, 高清竹, 胡国铮. 施氮对藏北垂穗披碱草人工草地叶片功能性状和种群特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(5): 51-60.
[5]	刘航江, 宗人旭, 刘金平, 游明鸿, 徐晓霞. 草地群落类型对乳白香青种群特征和雌雄株形态及抗性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(10): 113-124.
[6]	张鲜花, 陈爱萍, 朱进忠, 李海琪. 天山北坡不同区域及海拔对天然草地鸭茅群落物种种间关系影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(8): 12-23.
[7]	马周文, 王迎新, 王宏, 阿不满, 张贞明, 侯扶江. 放牧生态系统枯落物及其作用[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(7): 201-212.
[8]	范高华, 黄迎新, 赵学勇, 神祥金. 种群密度对沙米异速生长的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(3): 53-64.
[9]	郑普阳, 彭真, 王勇, 徐云虎, 贺兵, 王玉梅, 赵景瑞. 贝奥不育剂和溴敌隆抗凝血杀鼠剂对布氏田鼠种群控制作用的试验研究[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(12): 186-193.
[10]	刘文亭, 卫智军, 吕世杰, 王天乐, 张爽, 海松. 放牧调控对短花针茅种群年龄及叶性状的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(1): 63-71.
[11]	张露丹, 李海燕, 杨允菲. 松嫩平原单优种群落斑块拂子茅种群构件的年龄结构[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(9): 20-27.
[12]	许玉凤, 杨井, 李卫红, 方功焕, 张淑花, 邓海军, 董杰. 1982-2013年新疆不同植被生长时空变化[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(1): 47-63.
[13]	刘龙昌, 杜改改, 司卫杰, 王菲, 罗海军, 周正军. 不同生境小花山桃草自然种群表型变异与协变[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(7): 41-51.
[14]	赵凤杰，王正浩，王慧萍，吴惠惠，刘航玮，王广君，张泽华. 不同密度短星翅蝗危害后羊草的高光谱变化及对产草量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(3): 195-203.
[15]	杜军利, 武德功, 吕宁, 刘长仲. 不同温度条件下两种色型豌豆蚜的种群参数[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(11): 91-99.