草业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 49-59.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020310
收稿日期:
2020-06-30
修回日期:
2020-08-31
出版日期:
2021-07-09
发布日期:
2021-07-09
通讯作者:
杜文华
作者简介:
Corresponding author. E-mail: duwh@gsau.edu.cn基金资助:
Qiang XU(), Xin-hui TIAN, Wen-hua DU()
Received:
2020-06-30
Revised:
2020-08-31
Online:
2021-07-09
Published:
2021-07-09
Contact:
Wen-hua DU
摘要:
为筛选适宜甘肃高寒牧区的箭筈豌豆与黑麦混播组合及比例,采用裂区设计,研究了3个箭筈豌豆品种(绿箭1号、绿箭2号和绿箭431)与黑麦新品系C33在不同混播比例(0∶100、20∶80、30∶70、40∶60、50∶50、60∶40、70∶30、80∶20、100∶0)下的生产性能及营养品质。结果表明,从混播组合看,A?(C33×绿箭1号)的平均干草产量(7.16 t·hm-2)和综合评价值(0.860)较高;从混播比例看,B?(60∶40)的平均干草产量(8.01 t·hm-2)和综合评价值(0.691)最高;混播组合和混播比例间的交互作用表明,A?以B?比例混播时干草产量(9.03 t·hm-2)和综合评价值(0.711)最高。
徐强, 田新会, 杜文华. 高寒牧区黑麦和箭筈豌豆混播对草产量和营养品质的影响研究[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(8): 49-59.
Qiang XU, Xin-hui TIAN, Wen-hua DU. Effects of mixed sowing of rye and common vetch on forage yield and nutrient quality in alpine pastoral areas[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 49-59.
编号Code | 黑麦Rye | 箭筈豌豆Common vetch |
---|---|---|
B? | 250 | 0.0 |
B? | 320 | 36.8 |
B? | 280 | 55.2 |
B? | 240 | 73.6 |
B? | 200 | 92.0 |
B? | 160 | 110.4 |
B? | 120 | 128.8 |
B? | 80 | 147.2 |
B? | 0 | 115.0 |
表1 不同混播比例下黑麦与箭筈豌豆的播种量
Table 1 Seeding rate of rye and common vetch of different mixed ratio (kg·hm-2)
编号Code | 黑麦Rye | 箭筈豌豆Common vetch |
---|---|---|
B? | 250 | 0.0 |
B? | 320 | 36.8 |
B? | 280 | 55.2 |
B? | 240 | 73.6 |
B? | 200 | 92.0 |
B? | 160 | 110.4 |
B? | 120 | 128.8 |
B? | 80 | 147.2 |
B? | 0 | 115.0 |
变异来源 Variation source | 株高Height | 总枝条数No. | 总产量Total yield | FW/HY | CP | NDF | ADF | DMD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH | VH | FW | HY | |||||||
混播组合Mixture combination (C) | 1.71 | 7.61** | 2.75 | 19.89** | 9.98** | 0.53 | 1.27 | 0.38 | 1.80 | 1.80 |
混播比例Mixture ratio (R) | 14.55** | 14.15** | 38.76** | 4.57** | 9.56** | 9.16** | 112.16** | 78.32** | 38.23** | 38.23** |
混播组合×混播比例C×R | 6.43** | 17.34** | 28.55** | 8.80** | 16.34** | 27.78** | 81.67** | 24.65** | 25.08** | 25.08** |
表2 混播组合间、混播比例间和混播组合×混播比例交互作用间株高、总枝条数、鲜(干)草产量、鲜干比和营养品质的方差分析
Table 2 Variance analysis on the plant height of rye (RH) and common vetch (VH), total number of branches (No.), total fresh weight (FW), total hay yield (HY), FW/HY and nutrition quality within the mixture combination, mixed ratio and the interaction of mixture combination and mixed ratio
变异来源 Variation source | 株高Height | 总枝条数No. | 总产量Total yield | FW/HY | CP | NDF | ADF | DMD | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH | VH | FW | HY | |||||||
混播组合Mixture combination (C) | 1.71 | 7.61** | 2.75 | 19.89** | 9.98** | 0.53 | 1.27 | 0.38 | 1.80 | 1.80 |
混播比例Mixture ratio (R) | 14.55** | 14.15** | 38.76** | 4.57** | 9.56** | 9.16** | 112.16** | 78.32** | 38.23** | 38.23** |
混播组合×混播比例C×R | 6.43** | 17.34** | 28.55** | 8.80** | 16.34** | 27.78** | 81.67** | 24.65** | 25.08** | 25.08** |
混播组合 Mixture combination | 箭筈豌豆的平均株高Average height of common vetch (cm) | 平均鲜草产量 Average fresh weight (t·hm-2) | 平均干草产量 Average hay yield (t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|
A? | 95.40±1.18a | 29.82±1.09a | 7.16±0.29a |
A? | 92.82±1.26a | 27.73±1.14a | 6.81±0.36a |
A? | 89.32±0.85b | 21.34±0.66b | 5.31±0.27b |
表3 混播组合间箭筈豌豆平均株高、平均鲜(干)草产量的差异
Table 3 Differences of the averaged plant height, average fresh weight and average hay yield among the mixture combination
混播组合 Mixture combination | 箭筈豌豆的平均株高Average height of common vetch (cm) | 平均鲜草产量 Average fresh weight (t·hm-2) | 平均干草产量 Average hay yield (t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|
A? | 95.40±1.18a | 29.82±1.09a | 7.16±0.29a |
A? | 92.82±1.26a | 27.73±1.14a | 6.81±0.36a |
A? | 89.32±0.85b | 21.34±0.66b | 5.31±0.27b |
图1 混播比例间黑麦和箭筈豌豆株高的差异不同小写字母表示差异极显著(P<0.01),下同。Different lowercase letters mean significant difference at the 0.01 level, the same below.
Fig.1 Differences of the plant height of rye and common vetch among different mixed ratio
混播比例 Mixed ratio | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 干物质消化率 Dry matter digestibility (DMD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
B? | 8.91±0.11f | 57.94±0.81a | 38.60±0.27a | 58.83±0.21e |
B? | 9.73±0.17f | 57.56±0.42a | 37.53±0.56ab | 59.66±0.44de |
B? | 11.37±0.35e | 56.34±0.90ab | 36.73±0.90ab | 60.29±0.70de |
B? | 12.97±0.33d | 55.21±1.01b | 36.71±0.53ab | 60.30±0.41de |
B? | 13.54±0.25d | 53.99±0.77b | 35.67±0.48b | 61.11±0.38d |
B? | 13.97±0.41d | 54.09±0.64b | 36.38±0.50b | 60.56±0.39d |
B? | 15.02±0.42c | 50.20±0.57c | 33.39±0.86c | 62.89±0.67c |
B? | 16.57±0.56b | 47.35±0.94d | 29.84±1.15d | 65.65±0.90b |
B? | 20.98±0.29a | 36.35±0.69e | 25.27±0.58e | 69.22±0.46a |
表4 混播比例对平均粗蛋白、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维含量和干物质消化率的影响
Table 4 Effect of mixed ratio on CP, NDF, ADF content and DMD (%)
混播比例 Mixed ratio | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 干物质消化率 Dry matter digestibility (DMD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
B? | 8.91±0.11f | 57.94±0.81a | 38.60±0.27a | 58.83±0.21e |
B? | 9.73±0.17f | 57.56±0.42a | 37.53±0.56ab | 59.66±0.44de |
B? | 11.37±0.35e | 56.34±0.90ab | 36.73±0.90ab | 60.29±0.70de |
B? | 12.97±0.33d | 55.21±1.01b | 36.71±0.53ab | 60.30±0.41de |
B? | 13.54±0.25d | 53.99±0.77b | 35.67±0.48b | 61.11±0.38d |
B? | 13.97±0.41d | 54.09±0.64b | 36.38±0.50b | 60.56±0.39d |
B? | 15.02±0.42c | 50.20±0.57c | 33.39±0.86c | 62.89±0.67c |
B? | 16.57±0.56b | 47.35±0.94d | 29.84±1.15d | 65.65±0.90b |
B? | 20.98±0.29a | 36.35±0.69e | 25.27±0.58e | 69.22±0.46a |
处理 Treatment | 株高Height (cm) | 总枝条数 No. (×104·hm-2) | 产量Yield (t·hm-2) | 鲜干比 FW/HY | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH | VH | FW | HY | |||
A?B? | 167.87±1.31k | — | 478.67±7.51fghij | 27.50±2.70cdefgh | 7.22±0.71cdef | 3.16±0.06n |
A?B? | 168.47±2.00jk | 90.30±1.02fgh | 590.33±15.45a | 32.75±0.33abc | 7.37±0.08bcdef | 3.79±0.07jkl |
A?B? | 173.80±1.34bcdefgh | 96.67±0.96bcd | 515.67±18.67bcdefg | 28.75±0.24cdef | 6.90±0.06defg | 4.17±0.06fgh |
A?B? | 174.50±1.78bcdefg | 95.00±1.04cde | 498.33±30.37ghij | 28.58±1.39cdef | 7.07±0.35cdef | 4.04±0.05hij |
A?B? | 174.23±0.67bcdefg | 100.90±0.84ab | 573.33±19.23hij | 36.75±3.71a | 8.68±0.87ab | 4.23±0.05efgh |
A?B? | 177.33±1.76abc | 98.50±1.39abc | 561.00±24.79abcde | 37.00±3.73a | 9.03±0.50a | 4.42±0.05ef |
A?B? | 170.07±1.10ghijk | 101.57±1.10a | 534.00±15.01abcdef | 27.50±0.77cdefgh | 7.63±0.21bcde | 3.59±0.08lm |
A?B? | 169.57±1.31hijk | 96.20±1.33cde | 556.67±22.67abcd | 28.45±0.43cdef | 6.50±0.10efgh | 4.37±0.08ef |
A?B? | — | 84.07±1.05jk | 260.67±13.32k | 21.08±1.59hij | 4.03±0.53jk | 4.76±0.07d |
A?B? | 169.30±1.08hijk | — | 462.00±19.70hij | 27.67±0.96cdefg | 7.39±0.26bcdef | 3.18±0.03n |
A?B? | 170.40±0.83fghijk | 85.77±1.08ijk | 501.67±19.63defghi | 25.67±0.59defgh | 6.29±0.14efghi | 4.07±0.02ghi |
A?B? | 177.27±1.04abc | 88.37±1.93ghij | 529.33±26.03bcdefg | 29.06±5.51cde | 6.29±0.17efghi | 3.73±0.07klm |
A?B? | 178.33±1.29ab | 96.87±1.40bcd | 470.67±19.19ghij | 26.08±1.59defgh | 8.19±0.50abcd | 3.74±0.06klm |
A?B? | 176.80±1.17abcd | 99.03±2.33abc | 457.00±16.20hij | 26.25±1.69defgh | 8.37±0.53abc | 4.47±0.04e |
A?B? | 179.33±0.87a | 98.47±2.98abc | 542.67±20.80abcde | 35.67±2.31ab | 8.99±0.58a | 3.97±0.02h |
A?B? | 172.57±1.15defghij | 97.43±0.72abcd | 455.00±4.51ij | 31.50±2.12abcd | 7.32±0.49bcdef | 4.31±0.11efg |
A?B? | 168.40±1.63jk | 91.93±0.87efg | 479.67±19.23fghij | 30.33±1.89bcd | 5.65±0.35ghi | 5.34±0.10c |
A?B? | — | 84.67±0.33jk | 220.00±4.36k | 17.33±0.38jk | 2.80±0.06k | 6.19±0.10a |
A?B? | 170.07±1.59ghijk | — | 481.00±11.93fghij | 19.17±1.06ijk | 6.08±0.33fghi | 3.15±0.08n |
A?B? | 172.20±1.94efghijk | 87.00±0.81hij | 516.33±24.85bcdefgh | 23.39±0.49efghij | 6.78±0.14efg | 3.43±0.13m |
A?B? | 171.70±0.81efghijk | 90.20±0.99fgh | 494.67±20.34efghij | 19.08±0.53ijk | 5.25±0.14ij | 3.64±0.09l |
A?B? | 176.20±1.27abcde | 87.80±1.47ghij | 510.00±14.22cdefghi | 26.00±0.39defgh | 6.70±0.62efgh | 3.57±0.10lm |
A?B? | 175.13±2.10abcde | 95.13±1.49cde | 439.00±9.61j | 21.75±1.40ghij | 5.21±0.63ij | 3.83±0.15ijkl |
A?B? | 174.87±1.74abcdef | 93.60±1.71def | 469.00±17.52ghij | 23.75±0.53efghi | 6.01±0.44fghi | 3.70±0.09l |
A?B? | 173.17±1.10cdefghi | 89.20±1.42ghi | 474.00±12.49fghij | 21.61±0.92ghij | 5.36±0.23hi | 4.02±0.07hi |
A?B? | 168.87±0.58ijk | 89.13±0.52ghi | 476.00±13.23fghij | 22.42±1.78fghij | 4.18±0.53jk | 5.36±0.08c |
A?B? | — | 82.47±0.87k | 217.00±4.04k | 15.89±0.22k | 2.87±0.43k | 5.67±0.16b |
表5 混播组合×混播比例交互作用间黑麦株高、箭筈豌豆株高和混播草地总枝条数、鲜(干)草产量和鲜干比的差异
Table 5 Differences of the plant height of rye (RH) and common vetch (VH), the total number of branches (No.), total fresh weight (FW), total hay yield (HY) and FW/HY for the interaction of mixture combination and mixed ratio
处理 Treatment | 株高Height (cm) | 总枝条数 No. (×104·hm-2) | 产量Yield (t·hm-2) | 鲜干比 FW/HY | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RH | VH | FW | HY | |||
A?B? | 167.87±1.31k | — | 478.67±7.51fghij | 27.50±2.70cdefgh | 7.22±0.71cdef | 3.16±0.06n |
A?B? | 168.47±2.00jk | 90.30±1.02fgh | 590.33±15.45a | 32.75±0.33abc | 7.37±0.08bcdef | 3.79±0.07jkl |
A?B? | 173.80±1.34bcdefgh | 96.67±0.96bcd | 515.67±18.67bcdefg | 28.75±0.24cdef | 6.90±0.06defg | 4.17±0.06fgh |
A?B? | 174.50±1.78bcdefg | 95.00±1.04cde | 498.33±30.37ghij | 28.58±1.39cdef | 7.07±0.35cdef | 4.04±0.05hij |
A?B? | 174.23±0.67bcdefg | 100.90±0.84ab | 573.33±19.23hij | 36.75±3.71a | 8.68±0.87ab | 4.23±0.05efgh |
A?B? | 177.33±1.76abc | 98.50±1.39abc | 561.00±24.79abcde | 37.00±3.73a | 9.03±0.50a | 4.42±0.05ef |
A?B? | 170.07±1.10ghijk | 101.57±1.10a | 534.00±15.01abcdef | 27.50±0.77cdefgh | 7.63±0.21bcde | 3.59±0.08lm |
A?B? | 169.57±1.31hijk | 96.20±1.33cde | 556.67±22.67abcd | 28.45±0.43cdef | 6.50±0.10efgh | 4.37±0.08ef |
A?B? | — | 84.07±1.05jk | 260.67±13.32k | 21.08±1.59hij | 4.03±0.53jk | 4.76±0.07d |
A?B? | 169.30±1.08hijk | — | 462.00±19.70hij | 27.67±0.96cdefg | 7.39±0.26bcdef | 3.18±0.03n |
A?B? | 170.40±0.83fghijk | 85.77±1.08ijk | 501.67±19.63defghi | 25.67±0.59defgh | 6.29±0.14efghi | 4.07±0.02ghi |
A?B? | 177.27±1.04abc | 88.37±1.93ghij | 529.33±26.03bcdefg | 29.06±5.51cde | 6.29±0.17efghi | 3.73±0.07klm |
A?B? | 178.33±1.29ab | 96.87±1.40bcd | 470.67±19.19ghij | 26.08±1.59defgh | 8.19±0.50abcd | 3.74±0.06klm |
A?B? | 176.80±1.17abcd | 99.03±2.33abc | 457.00±16.20hij | 26.25±1.69defgh | 8.37±0.53abc | 4.47±0.04e |
A?B? | 179.33±0.87a | 98.47±2.98abc | 542.67±20.80abcde | 35.67±2.31ab | 8.99±0.58a | 3.97±0.02h |
A?B? | 172.57±1.15defghij | 97.43±0.72abcd | 455.00±4.51ij | 31.50±2.12abcd | 7.32±0.49bcdef | 4.31±0.11efg |
A?B? | 168.40±1.63jk | 91.93±0.87efg | 479.67±19.23fghij | 30.33±1.89bcd | 5.65±0.35ghi | 5.34±0.10c |
A?B? | — | 84.67±0.33jk | 220.00±4.36k | 17.33±0.38jk | 2.80±0.06k | 6.19±0.10a |
A?B? | 170.07±1.59ghijk | — | 481.00±11.93fghij | 19.17±1.06ijk | 6.08±0.33fghi | 3.15±0.08n |
A?B? | 172.20±1.94efghijk | 87.00±0.81hij | 516.33±24.85bcdefgh | 23.39±0.49efghij | 6.78±0.14efg | 3.43±0.13m |
A?B? | 171.70±0.81efghijk | 90.20±0.99fgh | 494.67±20.34efghij | 19.08±0.53ijk | 5.25±0.14ij | 3.64±0.09l |
A?B? | 176.20±1.27abcde | 87.80±1.47ghij | 510.00±14.22cdefghi | 26.00±0.39defgh | 6.70±0.62efgh | 3.57±0.10lm |
A?B? | 175.13±2.10abcde | 95.13±1.49cde | 439.00±9.61j | 21.75±1.40ghij | 5.21±0.63ij | 3.83±0.15ijkl |
A?B? | 174.87±1.74abcdef | 93.60±1.71def | 469.00±17.52ghij | 23.75±0.53efghi | 6.01±0.44fghi | 3.70±0.09l |
A?B? | 173.17±1.10cdefghi | 89.20±1.42ghi | 474.00±12.49fghij | 21.61±0.92ghij | 5.36±0.23hi | 4.02±0.07hi |
A?B? | 168.87±0.58ijk | 89.13±0.52ghi | 476.00±13.23fghij | 22.42±1.78fghij | 4.18±0.53jk | 5.36±0.08c |
A?B? | — | 82.47±0.87k | 217.00±4.04k | 15.89±0.22k | 2.87±0.43k | 5.67±0.16b |
处理 Treatment | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 干物质消化率 Dry matter digestibility (DMD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A?B? | 8.72±0.26l | 57.81±0.23ab | 38.43±0.12abc | 58.97±0.10hij |
A?B? | 9.60±0.13kl | 56.81±0.73abc | 37.18±1.15abcde | 59.94±0.89efghij |
A?B? | 11.89±0.52i | 56.00±0.65abcd | 34.74±0.43fg | 61.84±0.34de |
A?B? | 12.76±0.42ghi | 55.52±0.56abcd | 35.79±0.31cdefg | 61.02±0.24defgh |
A?B? | 13.43±0.23fgh | 53.99±1.99abcde | 35.22±0.59defg | 61.47±0.46defg |
A?B? | 14.05±0.65efg | 54.62±0.57abcd | 36.20±0.44cdefg | 60.70±0.35defgh |
A?B? | 15.09±0.18e | 51.89±0.81def | 31.18±0.56h | 64.61±0.43c |
A?B? | 17.52±0.39c | 48.90±2.62fg | 26.15±0.03ij | 68.53±0.03ab |
A?B? | 21.42±0.57a | 37.97±1.40h | 23.57±1.00j | 70.54±0.78a |
A?B? | 9.09±0.20l | 57.70±1.59ab | 39.28±0.70ab | 58.30±0.54ij |
A?B? | 9.87±0.35kl | 57.32±0.33ab | 37.71±1.24abcdef | 59.52±0.97efghij |
A?B? | 11.61±0.62ij | 55.80±0.87abcd | 39.66±0.65a | 58.01±0.50j |
A?B? | 13.94±0.48efg | 53.91±0.39bcde | 36.75±0.94abcdefg | 60.27±0.74defghij |
A?B? | 14.32±0.38ef | 52.51±0.66cdef | 36.53±0.54bcdefg | 60.45±0.42defghi |
A?B? | 15.11±0.34e | 52.02±0.70def | 37.80±0.98abcde | 59.45±0.76fghij |
A?B? | 16.35±0.39d | 49.76±0.42efg | 34.86±1.53efg | 61.75±1.19def |
A?B? | 17.65±0.49c | 45.54±0.26g | 29.52±0.03h | 65.91±0.03c |
A?B? | 21.34±0.18a | 35.99±1.10h | 26.63±0.67i | 68.16±0.52ab |
A?B? | 8.90±0.13l | 58.55±0.84a | 38.09±0.13abcd | 59.23±0.10ghij |
A?B? | 9.72±0.42kl | 58.30±2.29ab | 37.70±0.89abcdef | 59.53±0.69efghij |
A?B? | 10.62±0.59jk | 57.22±2.84ab | 35.80±1.58cdefg | 61.01±1.23defgh |
A?B? | 12.21±0.32ghi | 56.20±3.22abcd | 37.59±1.23abcdef | 59.62±0.96efghij |
A?B? | 12.86±0.16ghi | 55.46±0.75abcd | 35.28±1.27defg | 61.42±0.99defg |
A?B? | 12.75±0.31ghi | 55.62±0.77abcd | 35.12±0.17defg | 61.54±0.13defg |
A?B? | 13.63±0.27fg | 48.96±0.87fg | 34.13±1.58g | 62.32±1.23d |
A?B? | 14.55±0.60ef | 47.62±0.92g | 33.86±1.02g | 62.53±0.80d |
A?B? | 20.18±0.39b | 35.09±0.65h | 25.60±0.48ij | 68.96±0.37ab |
表6 混播组合×混播比例交互作用间粗蛋白、中性洗涤纤维、酸性洗涤纤维含量和干物质消化率的差异
Table 6 Differences of the contents of CP, NDF, ADF and DMD for the interaction of the mixture combination and mixed ratio (%)
处理 Treatment | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF) | 干物质消化率 Dry matter digestibility (DMD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A?B? | 8.72±0.26l | 57.81±0.23ab | 38.43±0.12abc | 58.97±0.10hij |
A?B? | 9.60±0.13kl | 56.81±0.73abc | 37.18±1.15abcde | 59.94±0.89efghij |
A?B? | 11.89±0.52i | 56.00±0.65abcd | 34.74±0.43fg | 61.84±0.34de |
A?B? | 12.76±0.42ghi | 55.52±0.56abcd | 35.79±0.31cdefg | 61.02±0.24defgh |
A?B? | 13.43±0.23fgh | 53.99±1.99abcde | 35.22±0.59defg | 61.47±0.46defg |
A?B? | 14.05±0.65efg | 54.62±0.57abcd | 36.20±0.44cdefg | 60.70±0.35defgh |
A?B? | 15.09±0.18e | 51.89±0.81def | 31.18±0.56h | 64.61±0.43c |
A?B? | 17.52±0.39c | 48.90±2.62fg | 26.15±0.03ij | 68.53±0.03ab |
A?B? | 21.42±0.57a | 37.97±1.40h | 23.57±1.00j | 70.54±0.78a |
A?B? | 9.09±0.20l | 57.70±1.59ab | 39.28±0.70ab | 58.30±0.54ij |
A?B? | 9.87±0.35kl | 57.32±0.33ab | 37.71±1.24abcdef | 59.52±0.97efghij |
A?B? | 11.61±0.62ij | 55.80±0.87abcd | 39.66±0.65a | 58.01±0.50j |
A?B? | 13.94±0.48efg | 53.91±0.39bcde | 36.75±0.94abcdefg | 60.27±0.74defghij |
A?B? | 14.32±0.38ef | 52.51±0.66cdef | 36.53±0.54bcdefg | 60.45±0.42defghi |
A?B? | 15.11±0.34e | 52.02±0.70def | 37.80±0.98abcde | 59.45±0.76fghij |
A?B? | 16.35±0.39d | 49.76±0.42efg | 34.86±1.53efg | 61.75±1.19def |
A?B? | 17.65±0.49c | 45.54±0.26g | 29.52±0.03h | 65.91±0.03c |
A?B? | 21.34±0.18a | 35.99±1.10h | 26.63±0.67i | 68.16±0.52ab |
A?B? | 8.90±0.13l | 58.55±0.84a | 38.09±0.13abcd | 59.23±0.10ghij |
A?B? | 9.72±0.42kl | 58.30±2.29ab | 37.70±0.89abcdef | 59.53±0.69efghij |
A?B? | 10.62±0.59jk | 57.22±2.84ab | 35.80±1.58cdefg | 61.01±1.23defgh |
A?B? | 12.21±0.32ghi | 56.20±3.22abcd | 37.59±1.23abcdef | 59.62±0.96efghij |
A?B? | 12.86±0.16ghi | 55.46±0.75abcd | 35.28±1.27defg | 61.42±0.99defg |
A?B? | 12.75±0.31ghi | 55.62±0.77abcd | 35.12±0.17defg | 61.54±0.13defg |
A?B? | 13.63±0.27fg | 48.96±0.87fg | 34.13±1.58g | 62.32±1.23d |
A?B? | 14.55±0.60ef | 47.62±0.92g | 33.86±1.02g | 62.53±0.80d |
A?B? | 20.18±0.39b | 35.09±0.65h | 25.60±0.48ij | 68.96±0.37ab |
处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A? | 0.860 | A?B? | 0.444 | A?B? | 0.453 | A?B? | 0.337 |
A? | 0.686 | A?B? | 0.485 | A?B? | 0.375 | A?B? | 0.417 |
A? | 0.057 | A?B? | 0.492 | A?B? | 0.371 | A?B? | 0.305 |
B? | 0.459 | A?B? | 0.504 | A?B? | 0.616 | A?B? | 0.439 |
B? | 0.474 | A?B? | 0.678 | A?B? | 0.645 | A?B? | 0.332 |
B? | 0.422 | A?B? | 0.711 | A?B? | 0.697 | A?B? | 0.410 |
B? | 0.588 | A?B? | 0.650 | A?B? | 0.593 | A?B? | 0.395 |
B? | 0.556 | A?B? | 0.635 | A?B? | 0.526 | A?B? | 0.298 |
B? | 0.691 | A?B? | 0.506 | A?B? | 0.357 | A?B? | 0.372 |
B? | 0.609 | ||||||
B? | 0.565 | ||||||
B? | 0.400 |
表7 混播组合、混播比例和混播组合×混播比例交互作用的综合评价值
Table 7 Comprehensive evaluation values for the single factor and the interaction of mixture combination and mixed ratio
处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij | 处理Treatment | rij |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A? | 0.860 | A?B? | 0.444 | A?B? | 0.453 | A?B? | 0.337 |
A? | 0.686 | A?B? | 0.485 | A?B? | 0.375 | A?B? | 0.417 |
A? | 0.057 | A?B? | 0.492 | A?B? | 0.371 | A?B? | 0.305 |
B? | 0.459 | A?B? | 0.504 | A?B? | 0.616 | A?B? | 0.439 |
B? | 0.474 | A?B? | 0.678 | A?B? | 0.645 | A?B? | 0.332 |
B? | 0.422 | A?B? | 0.711 | A?B? | 0.697 | A?B? | 0.410 |
B? | 0.588 | A?B? | 0.650 | A?B? | 0.593 | A?B? | 0.395 |
B? | 0.556 | A?B? | 0.635 | A?B? | 0.526 | A?B? | 0.298 |
B? | 0.691 | A?B? | 0.506 | A?B? | 0.357 | A?B? | 0.372 |
B? | 0.609 | ||||||
B? | 0.565 | ||||||
B? | 0.400 |
1 | Zheng Y S. Development demand analysis of irrigation system for forage land in pasture areas of Gansu Province. China Water Resources, 2015, 783(21): 47-48. |
郑永山. 甘肃省牧区灌溉饲草料地发展需求分析. 中国水利, 2015, 783(21): 47-48. | |
2 | Song Q, Tian X H, Du W H. Studies on production performance of new triticale lines in alpine pastoral areas of Gansu. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(7): 1367-1374. |
宋谦, 田新会, 杜文华. 甘肃省高寒牧区小黑麦新品系的生产性能. 草业科学, 2016, 33(7): 1367-1374. | |
3 | Ren Y X, Liu H C, Tian X H, et al. Response of the autumn sown triticale to the nitrogen fertilizing rate and seeding density in the alpine grazing area of Gannan. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019(4): 1044-1051. |
任昱鑫, 刘汉成, 田新会, 等. 甘南高寒牧区秋播小黑麦对氮肥施用量和播种密度的响应. 草地学报, 2019(4): 1044-1051. | |
4 | Ma Y Q. Study on mixed sowing mode of annual grass-legume artificial grassland and yield formation mechanism in alpine region. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019. |
马妍琪. 高寒地区一年生禾本科-豆科人工草地混播模式及产量形成机制研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019. | |
5 | Li C X, Ye R R, Zhou Y B, et al. Evaluation on production performance and nutritive value of oat and common vetch mixture in alpine pastoral region. Grassland and Turf, 2016, 36(5): 40-45. |
李春喜, 叶润蓉, 周玉碧, 等. 高寒牧区燕麦与箭筈豌豆混播生产性能及营养价值评价. 草原与草坪, 2016, 36(5): 40-45. | |
6 | Guo X, Guo L X, Liu D B, et al. Analysis on yield and quality of smooth brome under single and mixed sowing. China Herbivore Science, 2018, 38(5): 62-65. |
郭孝, 郭良兴, 刘党标, 等. 无芒雀麦在单播及混播下牧草产量和品质的分析. 中国草食动物科学, 2018, 38(5): 62-65. | |
7 | Ma C H, Zhang L, Han J G. Comparison trial on cultivated annual forage and crop in high-cold area. Journal of Sichuan Grassland, 2000(3): 17-22. |
马春晖, 张玲, 韩建国. 高寒地区一年生牧草饲料作物引种评比试验. 四川草原, 2000(3): 17-22. | |
8 | Ma J, Zheng W, Zhang B, et al. Production performance evaluation of oat-common vetch mixed pasture based on nutrient needs of horses. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(6): 1002-1009. |
马军, 郑伟, 张博, 等. 基于马营养需求的燕麦-箭筈豌豆混播草地生产性能的评价. 草业科学, 2015, 32(6): 1002-1009. | |
9 | Wang D, Wang J J, Li L H, et al. Forage yield and interspecific competition of mixed sowing of alfalfa and wheatgrass under dry farming. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(5): 27-31. |
王丹, 王俊杰, 李凌浩, 等. 旱作条件下苜蓿与冰草不同混播方式的产草量及种间竞争关系. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(5): 27-31. | |
10 | Shi Y H, Fu Y K. Study on community stability of mixed pastures in semi-desert area of Gansu. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2000, 9(3): 1-7. |
石永红, 符义坤. 半荒漠地区绿洲混播牧草群落稳定性与调控研究. 草业学报, 2000, 9(3): 1-7. | |
11 | Zhang Y L, Wang J L, Hu Z Z. Interspecific competition and community stability of variegated alfalfa+awnless brome mixture. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2007, 15(1): 43-49. |
张永亮, 王建丽, 胡自治. 杂花苜蓿与无芒雀麦混播群落种间竞争及稳定性. 草地学报, 2007, 15(1): 43-49. | |
12 | Zhao F Y, Du W H, Qu G P, et al. Studies on the production performance and nutritional value of new rye line C32 in pastoral areas of Tibet. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020(1): 279-284. |
赵方媛, 杜文华, 曲广鹏, 等. 黑麦新品系C32在西藏牧区的生产性能和营养价值研究. 草地学报, 2020(1): 279-284. | |
13 | Yun X J. The illustrated handbook of main cultivated forages of China. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2008: 7. |
贠旭疆. 中国主要优良栽培草种图鉴. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2008: 7. | |
14 | Guo J W, Tian X H, Du W H. Studies on seed yield and components of rye. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2017(4): 20-25. |
郭建文, 田新会, 杜文华. 黑麦种子产量及其构成因素研究. 甘肃农业科技, 2017(4): 20-25. | |
15 | Wang X, Zeng Z H, Hu Y G. Effect of oat intercropped with common vetch on aftercrop yield. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2009, 17(1): 63-67. |
王旭, 曾昭海, 胡跃高. 燕麦间作箭筈豌豆效应对后作产量的影响. 草地学报, 2009, 17(1): 63-67. | |
16 | Shi Y H, Wang Y Q, Gao X Z, et al. Studies on mixed-sown of annual forage and feed crops in agro-pastoral transitional zone in Northern Shanxi Province. Fuzhou: Agro-grassland Development Forum Online, 2008: 11. |
石永红, 王运琦, 高新中, 等. 雁门关农牧交错带一年生牧草及饲料作物产草量研究. 福州: 农区草业论坛, 2008: 11. | |
17 | Dhima K V, Lithourgidis A S, Vasilakoglou I B. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratio. Field Crops Research, 2007, 100(2/3): 249-256. |
18 | Zhang X Y. Effects of planting density on physiology, stem characteristics, yield and quality of winter rye. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2019. |
张雪悦. 种植密度对越冬型黑麦生理、茎秆特性及产量品质的影响研究. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2019. | |
19 | Meng X J, Han T H, Wu H J, et al. Study on the optimal harvest time of Scale cereal ‘Ganyin No.1’ in cold regions of Tianzhu County. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(4): 876-881. |
孟祥君, 韩天虎, 武慧娟, 等. 甘引1号黑麦在天祝县高寒区的最佳刈割期. 草业科学, 2018, 35(4): 876-881. | |
20 | Meng X J, Yu L P, Zhang S P, et al. Evaluation on the adaptation of ‘Ganyin No.1’ in alpine area. Grassland and Turf, 2017(6): 72-77. |
孟祥君, 俞联平, 张少平, 等. 甘引1号黑麦在高寒地区的适应性评价. 草原与草坪, 2017(6): 72-77. | |
21 | Liu J, La D, Wu J X, et al. Effects of cold, drought and combined stresses on the physiological characteristics of Secale cereale seedling. Plateau Science Research, 2017, 1(1): 57-66. |
刘杰, 拉多, 武俊喜, 等. 低温干旱复合胁迫对两个黑麦品种幼苗生理特性的影响. 高原科学研究, 2017, 1(1): 57-66. | |
22 | Yang Y W, Ou X J, Du T, et al. Cytogenetic analysis and identification of resistance to head blight of triticum-secale-thinopyrum trigeneric hybrid progenies. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2018(4): 492-496, 518. |
杨友伟, 欧雪洁, 杜婷, 等. 小麦-黑麦-偃麦草三属杂种后代细胞遗传学及赤霉病抗性鉴定. 河南农业大学学报, 2018(4): 492-496, 518. | |
23 | Guo J W, Tian X H, Zhang S Y, et al. Effect of different chlorocholine chlorid (CCC) concentrations on lodging resistance and seed yield of rye. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(5): 1128-1137. |
郭建文, 田新会, 张舒芸, 等. 不同浓度矮壮素对黑麦抗倒伏性和种子产量的影响. 草业科学, 2018, 35(5): 1128-1137. | |
24 | Liu H C, Tian X H, Du W H. Structural characteristics of the inflorescence and grain traits of triticale and rye corn. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(7): 120-132. |
刘汉成, 田新会, 杜文华. 小黑麦与黑麦花序结构和籽粒特性比较. 草业学报, 2018, 27(7): 120-132. | |
25 | Liu H C, Tian X H, Du W H. Comparison on structural features of second internodes at base of main stem between triticale and rye. Grassland and Turf, 2018, 38(3): 56-61. |
刘汉成, 田新会, 杜文华. 小黑麦和黑麦主茎基部第2节间解剖结构特征比较. 草原与草坪, 2018, 38(3): 56-61. | |
26 | Fu X N, Pan Z W, Meng X J, et al. The study for mix-sowing of Secale cereal L. ‘Ganyin No.1’ and Avena sativa L. to the alpine area in Tianzhu County. Journal of Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2016, 35(3): 14-16. |
富新年, 潘正武, 孟祥君, 等. 天祝高寒地区甘引1号黑麦+燕麦混播试验研究. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2016, 35(3): 14-16. | |
27 | Shao X Q. Mixplanting experiment on two new varieties of peas with 70-rye and oat. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2000, 35(3): 320-325. |
邵新庆. 两个新品种豌豆与冬牧70黑麦燕麦混播试验. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2000, 35(3): 320-325. | |
28 | Chen B S. Forage and crop cultivation. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2001. |
陈宝书. 牧草饲料作物栽培学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2001. | |
29 | GB/T 30395-2013. The technical regulations for herbage variety registration. Beijing: China Standards Press, 2013. |
GB/T 30395-2013. 草品种审定技术规程. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2013. | |
30 | Dai H L. Study on yield and nutritional quality of food-type triticale in Gannan area. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(2): 66-72. |
代寒凌. 甘南地区饲用型小黑麦草产量及营养品质研究. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(2): 66-72. | |
31 | Yang X, Li J H. Study on the seed production on different sowing date of Vicia sativa in Dazi of Tibet. China Herbivore Science, 2013, 33(5): 37-39. |
杨晓, 李锦华. 西藏达孜箭筈豌豆不同播种期种子生产性能研究. 中国草食动物科学, 2013, 33(5): 37-39. | |
32 | Li D M, Tian X H, Du W H. Studies on the forage yield and nutritional value of new triticale lines. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(6): 1164-1169. |
李冬梅, 田新会, 杜文华. 小黑麦新品系的草产量及营养价值研究. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1164-1169. | |
33 | Wang X, Zeng Z H, Hu Y G, et al. Progress and prospect on mixture of gramineae herbage and leguminosae herbage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007, 29(4): 92-98. |
王旭, 曾昭海, 胡跃高, 等. 豆科与禾本科牧草混播效应研究进展. 中国草地学报, 2007, 29(4): 92-98. | |
34 | Zhao H X, Zhu Z L, Zhang Y L, et al. Progress of research in mixed-seeding meadow. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2005, 21(11): 38-41, 49. |
赵海新, 朱占林, 张永亮, 等. 混播草地之研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(11): 38-41, 49. | |
35 | Zhou Q P. The yield and shrub layer and herbage layer of mixture of oat and pea. Grassland and Turf, 2002(3): 43-45. |
周青平. 燕麦+箭筈豌豆混播草地的草层结构与产量. 草原与草坪, 2002(3): 43-45. | |
36 | Gou W L, Li P, Zhang J B, et al. Study on the dynamics of above-ground biomass and nutritive value of annual ryegrass and common vetch mixtures. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(2): 198-206. |
苟文龙, 李平, 张建波, 等. 多花黑麦草+箭筈豌豆混播草地地上生物量和营养品质动态研究. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 198-206. | |
37 | Luo C Y, Zhao L, Zhao X Q, et al. Screening of seeding ratio of common vetch and oat mixture in Qinghai Lake Area. Grassland and Turf, 2019, 39(1): 95-99. |
罗彩云, 赵亮, 赵新全, 等. 青海湖地区燕麦与箭筈豌豆最佳混播比例的筛选. 草原与草坪, 2019, 39(1): 95-99. | |
38 | Wu S J. Effect of mixed seeding alfalfa with smooth bromegrass and crested wheat grass. Chinese Journal of Grassland,2010, 32(2): 15-18, 46. |
吴姝菊. 紫花苜蓿与无芒雀麦、扁穗冰草混播效果研究. 中国草地学报, 2010, 32(2): 15-18, 46. | |
39 | Wang F Q, Xiang J, Guo B G, et al. Effects of mixed sowing ratio, nitrogen application and irrigation on biomass//Proceedings of annual conference in 2017 by the Chinese grassland society. Guangzhou: Chinese Grassland Society, 2017. |
王富强, 向洁, 郭宝光, 等. 拉萨河谷区豆禾牧草混播比例、施氮、灌溉对生物量的影响//中国草学会2017中国草学会年会论文集. 广州: 中国草学会, 2017. | |
40 | Zhao F Y, Qu G P, Tian X H, et al. Yield and nutritional value evaluation of food-type triticale lines. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(6): 1374-1381. |
赵方媛, 曲广鹏, 田新会, 等. 饲料型小黑麦品系籽粒产量及其营养价值研究. 草地学报, 2018, 26(6): 1374-1381. |
[1] | 吴慧丽, 田薇, 纪燕玲, 娄来清, 蔡庆生. 促进镉吸收积累的植物根际促生菌的筛选及其对一年生黑麦草的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(7): 53-61. |
[2] | 高鹏, 魏江铭, 李瑶, 张丽红, 赵祥, 杜利霞, 韩伟. 山西省大同市早播饲用燕麦叶部真菌病害病原鉴定及影响因素分析[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(6): 82-93. |
[3] | 肖逸, 杨忠富, 聂刚, 韩佳婷, 帅杨, 张新全. 12个多花黑麦草品种(系)在成都平原的生产性能和营养价值综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(5): 174-185. |
[4] | 南志标, 王彦荣, 聂斌, 李春杰, 张卫国, 夏超. 春箭筈豌豆新品种“兰箭3号”选育与特性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(4): 111-120. |
[5] | 王辛有, 曹文侠, 王小军, 刘玉祯, 高瑞, 王世林, 安海涛, 邓秀霞, 王文虎. 河西地区豆禾混播草地生产性能对刈割高度与施肥的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(4): 99-110. |
[6] | 贾雨雷, 廖真, 汪丽芳, 卜建超, 林标声, 林辉, 苏德伟, 鲁国东, 林占熺. 化肥减量配施菌草固氮菌肥对巨菌草生长、营养品质及土壤养分的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3): 215-223. |
[7] | 沙栢平, 谢应忠, 高雪芹, 蔡伟, 伏兵哲. 地下滴灌水肥耦合对紫花苜蓿草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2): 102-114. |
[8] | 吴晓娟, 杨梅, 芦奕晓, 杨惠敏. 混播比例和施氮肥对箭筈豌豆/燕麦草地根系特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 106-116. |
[9] | 王琼, 段廷玉, 南志标. 箭筈豌豆炭疽病病原菌分离鉴定[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 127-136. |
[10] | 周瀚洋, 孙鹏越, 尉欣荣, 周雨, 张智伟, 高金柱, 赵东豪, 罗艺岚, 呼天明, 付娟娟. 琥珀酸黄杆菌缓解遮阴对多年生黑麦草胁迫的效应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 137-143. |
[11] | 谢开云, 曹凯, 万江春, 王玉祥, 赵云, 朱进忠. 新疆半干旱区不同豆科/禾本科牧草混播草地生产力的变化研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 29-40. |
[12] | 魏勇, 王晓瑜, 李应德, 段廷玉. AM真菌在白三叶-黑麦草体系中对抗逆信号的传导作用[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 138-146. |
[13] | 游永亮, 李源, 赵海明, 武瑞鑫, 刘贵波. 海河平原区施氮磷肥对饲用小黑麦生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 137-146. |
[14] | 谢开云, 王玉祥, 万江春, 张树振, 隋晓青, 赵云, 张博. 混播草地中豆科/禾本科牧草氮转移机理及其影响因素[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 157-170. |
[15] | 任昱鑫, 代寒凌, 田新会, 杜文华. 添加剂对甘肃省高寒牧区不同刈割期小黑麦青贮饲料营养品质和青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 197-206. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||