草业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 111-120.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020344
收稿日期:
2020-07-16
修回日期:
2020-08-21
出版日期:
2021-04-20
发布日期:
2021-03-16
通讯作者:
南志标
作者简介:
南志标(1951-),男,河北曲阳人,博士,教授,中国工程院院士。 E-mail: zhibiao@lzu.edu.cn基金资助:
Zhi-biao NAN(), Yan-rong WANG, Bin NIE, Chun-jie LI, Wei-guo ZHANG, Chao XIA
Received:
2020-07-16
Revised:
2020-08-21
Online:
2021-04-20
Published:
2021-03-16
Contact:
Zhi-biao NAN
摘要:
针对青藏高原草地畜牧业生产缺少优良豆科牧草的现状,从国际干旱地区农业研究中心(ICARDA)引进了育种材料,开展了春箭筈豌豆新品种选育。采用单株选择与混合选择相结合的方法,历时12年,育成“兰箭3号”春箭筈豌豆新品种。新品种显著的特性是早熟和种子产量高。在海拔3000 m的甘肃省甘南藏族自治州夏河县,连续多年的测定表明,平均生育期为100 d,生育期范围为92~106 d,平均种子产量为2023 kg·hm-2。比对照品种333/A生育期短13 d, 种子产量高174.9%。新品种牧草产量也较高,平均2769 kg·hm-2,与对照品种相近。在陇东黄土高原夏播,作为短期轮作作物,牧草产量达3214 kg·hm-2,比对照品种高14.3%。新品种可作为青藏高原地区的优良豆科牧草品种,也可用作传统农耕区的短期轮作或绿肥作物品种。
南志标, 王彦荣, 聂斌, 李春杰, 张卫国, 夏超. 春箭筈豌豆新品种“兰箭3号”选育与特性评价[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(4): 111-120.
Zhi-biao NAN, Yan-rong WANG, Bin NIE, Chun-jie LI, Wei-guo ZHANG, Chao XIA. Breeding of Lanjian No. 3 common vetch and evaluation of its characteristics[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 111-120.
项目Item | 夏河Xiahe | 碌曲Luqu | 西峰Xifeng |
---|---|---|---|
海拔Elevation (m) | 3050 | 3100 | 1298 |
年积温Accumulated temperature (≥0 ℃) | 1805.5 | 1707.2 | 3446.0 |
年降水Annual precipitation (mm) | 444.4 | 612.6 | 561.5 |
无霜期Frost-free days (d) | 50 | 40 | 160 |
K值K value | 2.5 | 3.6 | 1.6 |
草地类型Grassland types | 寒温潮湿Cold temperate-perhumid | 寒温潮湿Cold temperate-perhumid | 微温湿润Cool temperate-humid |
全氮Total nitrogen (%) | 0.21 | 0.26 | <0.10 |
全磷Total phosphorus (%) | 0.09 | 0.08 | - |
全钾Total potassium (%) | 1.70 | 1.82 | - |
有机质Organic matter (%) | 4.22 | 5.20 | <1.00 |
速效氮Available nitrogen (%) | 0.0023 | 0.0024 | - |
速效磷Available phosphorus (%) | 0.00075 | 0.00110 | - |
速效钾Available potassium (%) | 0.00175 | 0.00175 | - |
表1 各试验地点的自然条件
Table 1 Environmental conditions of experimental sites
项目Item | 夏河Xiahe | 碌曲Luqu | 西峰Xifeng |
---|---|---|---|
海拔Elevation (m) | 3050 | 3100 | 1298 |
年积温Accumulated temperature (≥0 ℃) | 1805.5 | 1707.2 | 3446.0 |
年降水Annual precipitation (mm) | 444.4 | 612.6 | 561.5 |
无霜期Frost-free days (d) | 50 | 40 | 160 |
K值K value | 2.5 | 3.6 | 1.6 |
草地类型Grassland types | 寒温潮湿Cold temperate-perhumid | 寒温潮湿Cold temperate-perhumid | 微温湿润Cool temperate-humid |
全氮Total nitrogen (%) | 0.21 | 0.26 | <0.10 |
全磷Total phosphorus (%) | 0.09 | 0.08 | - |
全钾Total potassium (%) | 1.70 | 1.82 | - |
有机质Organic matter (%) | 4.22 | 5.20 | <1.00 |
速效氮Available nitrogen (%) | 0.0023 | 0.0024 | - |
速效磷Available phosphorus (%) | 0.00075 | 0.00110 | - |
速效钾Available potassium (%) | 0.00175 | 0.00175 | - |
项目 Item | 原种 F0 | 第2代 F2 | 第3代 F3 | 第4代 F4 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
实测值 Measured | 比原种增加 Increase over Fo (%) | 实测值 Measured | 比原种增加 Increase over Fo (%) | |||
单株种子产量Seed yield per plant (g) | 2.69 | 3.01 | 4.95 | 84.1 | 5.05 | 87.7 |
每株荚数Pods per plant | 12.8 | 14.4 | 18.7 | 46.1 | 18.3 | 43.0 |
每荚粒数Seeds per pod | 2.6 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 34.6 | 3.3 | 26.9 |
千粒重1000-seed weight (g) | 69.7 | 70.2 | 73.8 | 5.9 | 69.4 | -0.4 |
单株牧草产量Herbage dry matter yield per plant (g) | 4.1 | 4.4 | 6.5 | 58.5 | 6.6 | 61.0 |
每株一级分枝数First branch number per plant | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 0 | 2.3 | -8.0 |
每株二级分枝数Second branch number per plant | 3.7 | 4.3 | 7.3 | 97.3 | 7.1 | 91.9 |
单株根重Root dry matter per plant (g) | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.12 | -14.4 | 0.12 | -14.2 |
表2 春箭筈豌豆2505-1品系各代种子与牧草产量及其构成因素
Table 2 Seed yield, herbage dry matter yield and their components of F0-F4 common vetch new line 2505-1
项目 Item | 原种 F0 | 第2代 F2 | 第3代 F3 | 第4代 F4 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
实测值 Measured | 比原种增加 Increase over Fo (%) | 实测值 Measured | 比原种增加 Increase over Fo (%) | |||
单株种子产量Seed yield per plant (g) | 2.69 | 3.01 | 4.95 | 84.1 | 5.05 | 87.7 |
每株荚数Pods per plant | 12.8 | 14.4 | 18.7 | 46.1 | 18.3 | 43.0 |
每荚粒数Seeds per pod | 2.6 | 2.8 | 3.5 | 34.6 | 3.3 | 26.9 |
千粒重1000-seed weight (g) | 69.7 | 70.2 | 73.8 | 5.9 | 69.4 | -0.4 |
单株牧草产量Herbage dry matter yield per plant (g) | 4.1 | 4.4 | 6.5 | 58.5 | 6.6 | 61.0 |
每株一级分枝数First branch number per plant | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.5 | 0 | 2.3 | -8.0 |
每株二级分枝数Second branch number per plant | 3.7 | 4.3 | 7.3 | 97.3 | 7.1 | 91.9 |
单株根重Root dry matter per plant (g) | 0.14 | 0.16 | 0.12 | -14.4 | 0.12 | -14.2 |
测定项目 Measuring item | 品种(系) Cultivar (line) | 年份 Year | 平均 Average | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |||
种子产量 Seed yield | 2505-1 | 1098a | 789a | 557a | 821 |
2505 | 868b | 610b | 489b | 656 | |
333/A | 321c | 566b | 173c | 353 | |
牧草产量 Herbage dry matter yield | 2505-1 | 1467ab | 2177ab | 2613a | 2086 |
2505 | 1193b | 1713b | 2136b | 1681 | |
333/A | 2149a | 2635a | 2801a | 2528 |
表3 新品系2505-1和对照品种的种子和牧草产量
Table 3 Seed and herbage dry matter yields of common vetch new line 2505-1 and control cultivar (kg·hm-2)
测定项目 Measuring item | 品种(系) Cultivar (line) | 年份 Year | 平均 Average | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |||
种子产量 Seed yield | 2505-1 | 1098a | 789a | 557a | 821 |
2505 | 868b | 610b | 489b | 656 | |
333/A | 321c | 566b | 173c | 353 | |
牧草产量 Herbage dry matter yield | 2505-1 | 1467ab | 2177ab | 2613a | 2086 |
2505 | 1193b | 1713b | 2136b | 1681 | |
333/A | 2149a | 2635a | 2801a | 2528 |
年份 Year | 品种(系) Cultivar (line) | 物候期Phenological phase (月-日Month-day) | 生育期 Growing days (d) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
出苗期 Seedling stage | 盛花期 Full-bloom stage | 结荚期 Fruiting stage | 成熟期 Maturation stage | |||
2003 | 2505-1 | 5-16 | 7-12 | 7-18 | 9-1 | 92c |
2505 | 5-16 | 7-10 | 7-16 | 9-5 | 98b | |
333/A | 5-18 | 7-15 | 7-20 | 9-19 | 104a | |
2004 | 2505-1 | 5-22 | 7-19 | 7-25 | 9-4 | 102c |
2505 | 5-22 | 7-17 | 7-23 | 9-8 | 108b | |
333/A | 5-22 | 7-22 | 8-4 | 9-22 | 114a | |
2005 | 2505-1 | 5-26 | 7-18 | 7-25 | 9-13 | 106c |
2505 | 5-26 | 7-20 | 7-27 | 9-16 | 111b | |
333/A | 5-26 | 7-26 | 8-3 | 9-28 | 122a |
表4 新品系2505-1和对照品种的物候期
Table 4 Phenological phase of common vetch new line 2505-1 and control cultivar
年份 Year | 品种(系) Cultivar (line) | 物候期Phenological phase (月-日Month-day) | 生育期 Growing days (d) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
出苗期 Seedling stage | 盛花期 Full-bloom stage | 结荚期 Fruiting stage | 成熟期 Maturation stage | |||
2003 | 2505-1 | 5-16 | 7-12 | 7-18 | 9-1 | 92c |
2505 | 5-16 | 7-10 | 7-16 | 9-5 | 98b | |
333/A | 5-18 | 7-15 | 7-20 | 9-19 | 104a | |
2004 | 2505-1 | 5-22 | 7-19 | 7-25 | 9-4 | 102c |
2505 | 5-22 | 7-17 | 7-23 | 9-8 | 108b | |
333/A | 5-22 | 7-22 | 8-4 | 9-22 | 114a | |
2005 | 2505-1 | 5-26 | 7-18 | 7-25 | 9-13 | 106c |
2505 | 5-26 | 7-20 | 7-27 | 9-16 | 111b | |
333/A | 5-26 | 7-26 | 8-3 | 9-28 | 122a |
地点 Sites | 年份 Year | 种子产量Seed yield (kg·hm-2) | 比2505增产 Increase over 2505 (%) | 比333/A增产 Increase over 333/A (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2505-1 | 2505 | 333/A | ||||
西峰Xifeng | 2006 | 26a | 22a | 0b | 18.2 | |
2007 | 467a | 401b | 333c | 16.5 | 40.2 | |
平均Average | 247 | 212 | 167 | 16.5 | 48.0 | |
夏河Xiahe | 2006 | 1625a | 1117b | 916c | 45.5 | 77.4 |
2007 | 2420a | 1936b | 555c | 25.0 | 336.0 | |
平均Average | 2023 | 1527 | 736 | 32.5 | 174.9 | |
碌曲Luqu | 2006 | 308a | 261b | 193c | 18.0 | 59.6 |
2007 | 256a | 215b | 76c | 19.1 | 236.8 | |
平均Average | 282 | 238 | 135 | 18.5 | 108.9 |
表5 新品系2505-1和对照品种在3个试验地的种子产量
Table 5 Seed yield of common vetch new line 2505-1 and control cultivar at 3 experimental sites
地点 Sites | 年份 Year | 种子产量Seed yield (kg·hm-2) | 比2505增产 Increase over 2505 (%) | 比333/A增产 Increase over 333/A (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2505-1 | 2505 | 333/A | ||||
西峰Xifeng | 2006 | 26a | 22a | 0b | 18.2 | |
2007 | 467a | 401b | 333c | 16.5 | 40.2 | |
平均Average | 247 | 212 | 167 | 16.5 | 48.0 | |
夏河Xiahe | 2006 | 1625a | 1117b | 916c | 45.5 | 77.4 |
2007 | 2420a | 1936b | 555c | 25.0 | 336.0 | |
平均Average | 2023 | 1527 | 736 | 32.5 | 174.9 | |
碌曲Luqu | 2006 | 308a | 261b | 193c | 18.0 | 59.6 |
2007 | 256a | 215b | 76c | 19.1 | 236.8 | |
平均Average | 282 | 238 | 135 | 18.5 | 108.9 |
地点 Site | 年份 Year | 牧草产量Herbage yield (kg·hm-2) | 比2505增产 Increase over 2505 (%) | 比333/A增产 Increase over 333/A (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2505-1 | 2505 | 333/A | ||||
西峰Xifeng | 2006 | 2937a | 2217c | 2583b | 32.5 | 13.7 |
2007 | 3490a | 2837b | 3041c | 23.0 | 14.8 | |
平均Average | 3214 | 2527 | 2812 | 27.2 | 14.3 | |
夏河Xiahe | 2006 | 2705a | 2132b | 2819a | 26.9 | -4.0 |
2007 | 2833a | 2518b | 3325a | 12.5 | -14.8 | |
平均Average | 2769 | 2325 | 3072 | 19.1 | -9.8 | |
碌曲Luqu | 2006 | 1989a | 1457b | 1993a | 36.5 | -0.2 |
2007 | 2436a | 2261a | 2415a | 7.7 | 0.9 | |
平均Average | 2213 | 1859 | 2204 | 19.0 | 0.4 |
表6 新品系2505-1和对照品种在3个试验地点的牧草产量
Table 6 Herbage dry matter yield of common vetch new line 2505-1 and control cultivar at 3 experimental sites
地点 Site | 年份 Year | 牧草产量Herbage yield (kg·hm-2) | 比2505增产 Increase over 2505 (%) | 比333/A增产 Increase over 333/A (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2505-1 | 2505 | 333/A | ||||
西峰Xifeng | 2006 | 2937a | 2217c | 2583b | 32.5 | 13.7 |
2007 | 3490a | 2837b | 3041c | 23.0 | 14.8 | |
平均Average | 3214 | 2527 | 2812 | 27.2 | 14.3 | |
夏河Xiahe | 2006 | 2705a | 2132b | 2819a | 26.9 | -4.0 |
2007 | 2833a | 2518b | 3325a | 12.5 | -14.8 | |
平均Average | 2769 | 2325 | 3072 | 19.1 | -9.8 | |
碌曲Luqu | 2006 | 1989a | 1457b | 1993a | 36.5 | -0.2 |
2007 | 2436a | 2261a | 2415a | 7.7 | 0.9 | |
平均Average | 2213 | 1859 | 2204 | 19.0 | 0.4 |
地点 Site | 年份 Year | 种子产量Seed yield (kg·hm-2) | 比2505增加 Increase over 2505 (%) | 比333/A增加 Increase over 333/A (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2505-1 | 2505 | 333/A | ||||
西峰Xifeng | 2008 | 1324 | 1158 | 865 | 14.3 | 53.1 |
2009 | 891 | 715 | 635 | 24.6 | 40.3 | |
平均Average | 1108 | 937 | 750 | 18.3 | 47.7 | |
夏河Xiahe | 2009 | 3005 | 2419 | 1339 | 24.2 | 124.4 |
2010 | 2729 | 2294 | 1561 | 19.0 | 74.8 | |
平均Average | 2867 | 2357 | 1450 | 21.7 | 97.7 | |
碌曲Luqu | 2009 | 145 | 107 | 39 | 35.5 | 271.8 |
2010 | 900 | 749 | 565 | 20.2 | 59.3 | |
平均Average | 523 | 428 | 302 | 22.2 | 73.2 |
表7 新品系2505-1和对照品种在大田生产条件下的种子产量
Table 7 Seed yield of common vetch new line 2505-1 and control cultivar under field conditions
地点 Site | 年份 Year | 种子产量Seed yield (kg·hm-2) | 比2505增加 Increase over 2505 (%) | 比333/A增加 Increase over 333/A (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2505-1 | 2505 | 333/A | ||||
西峰Xifeng | 2008 | 1324 | 1158 | 865 | 14.3 | 53.1 |
2009 | 891 | 715 | 635 | 24.6 | 40.3 | |
平均Average | 1108 | 937 | 750 | 18.3 | 47.7 | |
夏河Xiahe | 2009 | 3005 | 2419 | 1339 | 24.2 | 124.4 |
2010 | 2729 | 2294 | 1561 | 19.0 | 74.8 | |
平均Average | 2867 | 2357 | 1450 | 21.7 | 97.7 | |
碌曲Luqu | 2009 | 145 | 107 | 39 | 35.5 | 271.8 |
2010 | 900 | 749 | 565 | 20.2 | 59.3 | |
平均Average | 523 | 428 | 302 | 22.2 | 73.2 |
地点 Site | 年份 Year | 牧草产量Herbage yield (kg·hm-2) | 比2505增加 Increase over 2505 (%) | 比333/A增加 Increase over 333/A (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2505-1 | 2505 | 333/A | ||||
西峰Xifeng | 2008 | 1999 | 1840 | 1894 | 8.6 | 5.5 |
2009 | 2082 | 1782 | 1910 | 16.8 | 9.0 | |
平均Average | 2041 | 1811 | 1902 | 12.7 | 7.3 | |
夏河Xiahe | 2009 | 3878 | 3364 | 3525 | 15.3 | 10.0 |
2010 | 3719 | 2955 | 3612 | 25.9 | 3.0 | |
平均Average | 3799 | 3160 | 3569 | 20.2 | 6.4 | |
碌曲Luqu | 2009 | 3784 | 2608 | 3948 | 45.1 | -4.2 |
2010 | 2838 | 2411 | 2557 | 17.7 | 10.9 | |
平均Average | 3311 | 2510 | 3253 | 31.9 | 1.8 |
表8 新品系2505-1和对照品种在大田生产条件下的牧草产量
Table 8 Herbage dry matter yield of common vetch new line 2505-1 and control cultivar under field condition
地点 Site | 年份 Year | 牧草产量Herbage yield (kg·hm-2) | 比2505增加 Increase over 2505 (%) | 比333/A增加 Increase over 333/A (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2505-1 | 2505 | 333/A | ||||
西峰Xifeng | 2008 | 1999 | 1840 | 1894 | 8.6 | 5.5 |
2009 | 2082 | 1782 | 1910 | 16.8 | 9.0 | |
平均Average | 2041 | 1811 | 1902 | 12.7 | 7.3 | |
夏河Xiahe | 2009 | 3878 | 3364 | 3525 | 15.3 | 10.0 |
2010 | 3719 | 2955 | 3612 | 25.9 | 3.0 | |
平均Average | 3799 | 3160 | 3569 | 20.2 | 6.4 | |
碌曲Luqu | 2009 | 3784 | 2608 | 3948 | 45.1 | -4.2 |
2010 | 2838 | 2411 | 2557 | 17.7 | 10.9 | |
平均Average | 3311 | 2510 | 3253 | 31.9 | 1.8 |
测定项目Measuring item | 2505-1 | 333/A |
---|---|---|
幼苗茎基部颜色Color of basal part of seedling stem | 紫Purple | 紫Purple |
紫色茎基长度Length of purple basal part of stem (cm) | 1.8b | 4.4a |
叶片形态Leaf morphology | 条形、先端截形Strip, truncate at tips | 条形, 先端截形Strip, truncate at tips |
叶片长/宽Leaf length to width ratio | 4.0b | 5.2a |
幼苗茎秆长度Length of seedling stem (cm) | 8.7a | 10.7a |
播种至盛花期Days of sowing to full-bloom stage (d) | 73b | 80a |
花色Flower color | 紫红Aubergine | 紫红Aubergine |
千粒重1000-seed weight (g) | 75.5a | 61.7b |
种子形状Seed morphology | 近扁圆形Ovale | 长圆形Obround |
种皮特征Trait of seed coat | 灰褐色带黑色斑纹Taupe with black stripe | 灰绿或线棕色无斑纹 Celadon or light brown without stripe |
表9 新品系2505-1和品种333/A的形态特征
Table 9 Morphological traits of common vetch new line 2505-1 and cultivar 333/A
测定项目Measuring item | 2505-1 | 333/A |
---|---|---|
幼苗茎基部颜色Color of basal part of seedling stem | 紫Purple | 紫Purple |
紫色茎基长度Length of purple basal part of stem (cm) | 1.8b | 4.4a |
叶片形态Leaf morphology | 条形、先端截形Strip, truncate at tips | 条形, 先端截形Strip, truncate at tips |
叶片长/宽Leaf length to width ratio | 4.0b | 5.2a |
幼苗茎秆长度Length of seedling stem (cm) | 8.7a | 10.7a |
播种至盛花期Days of sowing to full-bloom stage (d) | 73b | 80a |
花色Flower color | 紫红Aubergine | 紫红Aubergine |
千粒重1000-seed weight (g) | 75.5a | 61.7b |
种子形状Seed morphology | 近扁圆形Ovale | 长圆形Obround |
种皮特征Trait of seed coat | 灰褐色带黑色斑纹Taupe with black stripe | 灰绿或线棕色无斑纹 Celadon or light brown without stripe |
1 | Wang Z, Song K, Hu L. China’s largest scale ecological migration in the three-river headwater region. Ambio, 2010, 39(5/6): 443-446. |
2 | Ayed M H, González J, Caballero R, et al. Effects of maturity on nutritive value of field-cured hays from common vetch and hairy vetch. Animal Research, 2001, 50(1): 31-42. |
3 | Collins C L, Dunshea F R, Henman D J, et al. The apparent ileal digestibility of amino acids in common vetch (Vicia sativa cv. Morava). Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2005, 45: 705-709. |
4 | Heravani J L, Esmaili M. Effects of double cropping grass pea and common vetch as green manure on some properties of soil and yield of onion and wheat in crop rotation cycle. Seed and Plant Production Journal, 2014, 30(1): 1-18. |
5 | Li Q. Mixed sowing of common vetches and oats in alpine region. Grassland and Forages in China, 1984, 1(1): 38-41. |
李琪. 高寒牧区箭筈豌豆与燕麦混播试验. 中国草原与牧草, 1984, 1(1): 38-41. | |
6 | Zhang Y S, Zhao X Q, Zhou X M. Mixed cropping of oat with three Leguminous pasture species in alpine pastoral area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2001, 10(1): 13-19. |
张耀生, 赵新全, 周兴民. 高寒牧区三种豆科牧草与燕麦混播的试验研究. 草业学报, 2001, 10(1): 13-19. | |
7 | Li R, Zhang Z X, Tang W, et al. Common vetch cultivars improve yield of oat row intercropping on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau by optimizing photosynthetic performance. European Journal of Agronomy, 2020, 117: 126088. |
8 | Wang Y W, Nan Z B, Wang Y R, et al. Herbage and seed yield of Vicia and Lathyrus species under alpine grassland conditions. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2001, 10(2): 47-55. |
王赟文, 南志标, 王彦荣, 等. 高山草原条件下一年生豆科牧草生产性能的评价. 草业学报, 2001, 10(2): 47-55. | |
9 | Ministry of Agriculture of the PRC. The technical regulations for herbage variety registration. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. |
中华人民共和国农业部. 草品种审定技术规程. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. | |
10 | Sattell R, Dick R, Luna J, et al. Common vetch (Vicia sativa L.)// Oregon over crops. Corvallis or Extension Service Oregon State University, 1998. |
11 | Abd El-Moneim A M, Ryan J. Forage legumes for dryland and agriculture in central and west Asia and North Africa // In: Rao Srinivas C, Ryan John. Challenges and strategies of dryland agriculture. Madison: Crop Science Society of America, Inc. and American Society of Agronomy, Inc., 2004. |
12 | Silvestri S, Bryan E, Ringler C, et al. Climate change perception and adaptation of agro-pastoral communities in Kenya. Regional Environmental Change, 2012, 12(4): 791-802. |
13 | Wan J M. Perspective of molecular design breeding in crops. Acta Agronomic Sinica, 2006, 32(3): 455-462. |
万建民. 作物分子设计育种. 作物学报, 2006, 32(3): 455-462. | |
14 | Liu Z P, Liu P, Luo D, et al. Exploiting Illumina sequencing for the development of 95 novel polymorphic EST-SSR markers in common vetch (Vicia sativa subsp. sativa). Molecules, 2014, 19: 5777-5789. |
15 | Chai X T, Dong R, Liu W X, et al. Optimizing sample size to assess the genetic diversity in common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) populations using start codon targeted (SCoT) markers. Molecules, 2017, 22: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22040567. |
16 | Min X Y, Wei X Y, Liu W X, et al. Analysis of genetic differences and construction of an SSR marker fingerprint for Vicia sativa varieties. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(4): 116-128. |
闵学阳, 韦兴燚, 刘文献, 等. 箭筈豌豆品种间遗传差异的SSR分析及指纹图谱构建. 草业学报, 2019, 28(4): 116-128. | |
17 | Min X Y, Lin X S, Ndayambaza B, et al. Coordinated mechanisms of leaves and roots in response to drought stress underlying full-length transcriptome profiling in Vicia sativa L. BMC Plant Biology, 2020, 20: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-020-02358-8. |
18 | Cakmakci S, Aydinoglu B, Karaca M, et al. Heritability of yield components in common vetch (Vicia sativa L.). Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science, 2006, 56(1): 54-59. |
19 | Larbi A, Abd El-Moneim A M, Nakkoul H, et al. Intra-species variations in yield and quality determinants in Vicia species: 3. common vetch (Vicia sativa ssp. sativa L.). Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011, 164(3/4): 241-251. |
20 | Çeliktaş N, Can E, Hatipoğlu R, et al. Comparison between a wild population and cultivar of common vetch (Vicia sativa L., Fabaceae) on cytological and agronomic characteristics. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 2006, 49: 389-393. |
21 | Bechkri S, Khelifi D. Variation in Vicia sativa s.l. from Algeria based on morphological characters and ecogeographic parameters. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2017, 64(4): 815-832. |
22 | Aouida M, Rook F, Bianca M A, et al. Polymorphisms in cyanogenic glucoside and cyano-amino acid content in natural accessions of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) and selection for improved agronomic performance. Plant Breeding, 2019, 138(3): 348-359. |
23 | Beyaz R. Impact of gamma irradiation pretreatment on the growth of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) seedlings grown under salt and drought stress. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 2020, 96(2): 257-266. |
24 | Liu H J, Zhu X Q, Li X N. A study on inheritance pattern of Vicia sativa variety I. major parameters of affecting seed yield. Pratacultural Science, 1989, 6(5): 16-21. |
刘洪杰, 朱学谦, 李幸男. 箭筈豌豆品种遗传规律的研究I——影响种子产量的主要遗传参数. 草业科学, 1989, 6(5): 16-21. | |
25 | Zhu X Q, Liu H J, Li X N. A study on inheritance pattern of Vicia sativa variety Ⅱ. the analysis on the correlation and its path coefficient of the major characters. Pratacultural Science, 1992, 9(2): 20-23. |
朱学谦, 刘洪杰, 李幸男. 箭筈豌豆品种遗传规律的研究——Ⅱ主要性状相关及其通径系数分析. 草业科学, 1992, 9(2): 20-23. | |
26 | Nan Z B, Zhang J Y, Wang Y R, et al. Genotype×environment interaction and consistency analysis for agronomic characteristics of Vicia sativa lines. Acta Ecological Sinica, 2004, 24(3): 395-401. |
南志标, 张吉宇, 王彦荣, 等. 五个箭筈豌豆品系基因型与环境互作效应及农艺性状稳定性. 生态学报, 2004, 24(3): 395-401. | |
27 | Papastylianou I. Effect of rainfall and temperature on yield of Vicia sativa under rainfed Mediterranean conditions. Grass and Forage Science, 1995, 50: 456-460. |
28 | Tudengqunpei. Performance of Vicia sativa cv. Lanjian No.3 in farming-pasturing interlaced area of Mozhugongka and cultivation techniques. Tibet Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 41(1): 58-59. |
土登群配. “兰箭3号”箭筈豌豆在墨竹工卡农牧交错区引进及栽培技术. 西藏农业科技, 2019, 41(1): 58-59. | |
29 | Qu G P, Baimagaweng, Liu Y F, et al. Effect of different mixed-sowing rate of Qinghai 444 oats and Lanjian Vicia sativa on production performance. Tibet Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 41(3): 21-23. |
曲广鹏, 白玛嘎翁, 刘云飞, 等. 不同混播比例对青海444燕麦与兰箭系列箭筈豌豆生产性能的影响. 西藏农业科技, 2019, 41(3): 21-23. | |
30 | Pan Y T, Wang C M, Zhang C, et al. Common vetch hay and the influence of Yucao on the digestibility, metabolism, and greenhouse gas emissions of lambs. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(11): 2907-2914. |
潘月婷, 王春梅, 张程, 等. 箭筈豌豆/玉草混合全草日粮改善绵羊消化代谢、减少甲烷生产. 草业科学, 2019, 36(11): 2907-2914. | |
31 | Ma W L, Nan Z B. Evaluation of productivity of different cropping systems in the Lhasa area of Tibet, China. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(6): 1616-1623. |
马望力, 南志标. 拉萨地区不同春箭筈豌豆轮作模式的生产力评价. 草业科学, 2019, 36(6): 1616-1623. |
[1] | 吴瑞, 刘文辉, 张永超, 秦燕, 魏小星, 刘敏洁. 青藏高原老芒麦落粒性及农艺性状相关性研究[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(4): 130-139. |
[2] | 王琼, 段廷玉, 南志标. 箭筈豌豆炭疽病病原菌分离鉴定[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 127-136. |
[3] | 邱月, 吴鹏飞, 魏雪. 三种人工草地小型土壤节肢动物群落多样性动态及其差异[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(5): 21-32. |
[4] | 谢开云, 曹凯, 万江春, 王玉祥, 赵云, 朱进忠. 新疆半干旱区不同豆科/禾本科牧草混播草地生产力的变化研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 29-40. |
[5] | 谢开云, 王玉祥, 万江春, 张树振, 隋晓青, 赵云, 张博. 混播草地中豆科/禾本科牧草氮转移机理及其影响因素[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 157-170. |
[6] | 杨阳, 田莉华, 田浩琦, 孙怀恩, 赵景学, 周青平. 增温对川西北高寒草甸草场植物凋落物分解的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(10): 35-46. |
[7] | 侯蒙京, 高金龙, 葛静, 李元春, 刘洁, 殷建鹏, 冯琦胜, 梁天刚. 青藏高原东部高寒沼泽湿地动态变化及其驱动因素研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(1): 13-27. |
[8] | 闵学阳, 韦兴燚, 刘文献, 张正社, 金小煜, NDAYAMBAZABoniface, 吴洪林, 李昱, 王彦荣. 箭筈豌豆品种间遗传差异的SSR分析及指纹图谱构建[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(4): 116-128. |
[9] | 刘慧, NZABANITAClement, 李彦忠. 苜蓿籽蜂寄生沙打旺种子的时期研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(4): 146-156. |
[10] | 闵学阳, 刘文献, 王彦荣, 林晓珊, 齐晓, 张正社, 聂斌. 箭筈豌豆新品种DUS测试指南研制—测试性状评价和参照品种筛选[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(11): 133-146. |
[11] | 李重阳, 樊文涛, 李国梅, 高晶, 唐增, 宋仁德. 基于NDVI的2000-2016年青藏高原牧户草场覆盖度变化驱动力分析[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(10): 25-32. |
[12] | 王富强, 向洁, 郭宝光, 余成群, 沈振西, 邵小明. 拉萨河谷区箭筈豌豆和黑麦混、间播建植方式研究[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(8): 39-49. |
[13] | 李蕾蕾, 花登峰, 郑兴卫, 李聪. 含水量和混播比例对青南牧区燕麦-箭筈豌豆/毛苕子混播青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(7): 166-174. |
[14] | 梁志婷, 邓建强, 王自奎, 沈禹颖, 王先之. 陇东旱塬区不同粮草轮作模式下土壤细菌群落组成特征[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(8): 180-191. |
[15] | 李亚婷, 宜树华, 侯扶江, 常生华, 王召锋, 秦彧, 陈建军. 高寒草甸生长盛期CO2交换特征对欧拉羊短期放牧的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(4): 24-32. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||