草业学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 128-138.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2021461
陈克玲1,2(), 王德权3, 刘洋3, 王艺3, 杜玉海3, 杜传印3, 马兴华1()
收稿日期:
2021-12-10
修回日期:
2022-02-21
出版日期:
2022-11-20
发布日期:
2022-10-01
通讯作者:
马兴华
作者简介:
E-mail: maxinghua@caas.cn基金资助:
Ke-ling CHEN1,2(), De-quan WANG3, Yang LIU3, Yi WANG3, Yu-hai DU3, Chuan-yin DU3, Xing-hua MA1()
Received:
2021-12-10
Revised:
2022-02-21
Online:
2022-11-20
Published:
2022-10-01
Contact:
Xing-hua MA
摘要:
通过研究沟垄集雨栽培技术对烤烟生长发育及品质的影响,提出适合山东烟区蓄水保墒的栽培模式。选用当地主栽烤烟品种云烟87和中烟100,通过一年两点大田试验,研究了沟垄集雨栽培对烟田土壤水分含量、烟株农艺性状、叶片光合速率、干物质积累、氮素含量、氮素积累量及烟叶化学成分和感官质量的影响。结果表明,与常规栽培模式相比,沟垄集雨栽培提高了烟田20~60 cm土层的土壤含水量,显著提高了云烟87现蕾期的叶长、叶宽及现蕾和平顶期的单叶面积,使平顶期的光合速率增加了28.5%,显著提高了干物质积累量和叶片中的氮素含量以及氮素积累量,降低了总糖、还原糖含量,提高了总氮和钾含量。沟垄集雨栽培显著提高了中烟100现蕾期的叶长和叶面积,并使平顶期的光合速率增加了14.8%,显著提高了双龙村旺长期的干物质积累量和成熟期的氮素积累量,总植物碱含量较常规栽培降低了12.7%,其他化学成分变化较小。沟垄集雨栽培技术通过对雨水的利用,调节了土壤的水分状况,促进了烤烟的生长发育,改善了两个品种的香气量、余味和杂气,最终提高了烟叶的感官评价质量。沟垄集雨种植是适宜山东丘陵山地烟区的优质高效栽培模式。
陈克玲, 王德权, 刘洋, 王艺, 杜玉海, 杜传印, 马兴华. 沟垄集雨种植对烤烟生长发育及烟叶品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(11): 128-138.
Ke-ling CHEN, De-quan WANG, Yang LIU, Yi WANG, Yu-hai DU, Chuan-yin DU, Xing-hua MA. Effects of a ridge-furrow rainfall harvesting system on the growth, development and quality of flue-cured tobacco[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 128-138.
地点 Location | pH | 有机质 Organic matter (g·kg -1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (g·kg -1) | 碱解氮 Available nitrogen (mg·kg -1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg -1) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg·kg -1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
双龙村Shuanglong Village | 7.49 | 16.2 | 0.89 | 81.0 | 8.5 | 81.7 |
赵北村Zhaobei Village | 7.85 | 20.8 | 1.23 | 116.0 | 9.1 | 107.8 |
表1 供试土壤的理化性质
Table 1 The properties of the tested soils
地点 Location | pH | 有机质 Organic matter (g·kg -1) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (g·kg -1) | 碱解氮 Available nitrogen (mg·kg -1) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg·kg -1) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg·kg -1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
双龙村Shuanglong Village | 7.49 | 16.2 | 0.89 | 81.0 | 8.5 | 81.7 |
赵北村Zhaobei Village | 7.85 | 20.8 | 1.23 | 116.0 | 9.1 | 107.8 |
图2 栽培模式示意图A: 常规起垄覆膜栽培模式Conventional ridge mulching cultivation method; B: 沟垄集雨栽培模式Rain harvesting cultivation method in furrows and ridges. 黑色代表覆膜Black represents film mulching.
Fig.2 Schematic diagram of cultivation method
图3 不同栽培模式对0~80 cm土层土壤含水量的影响CR、RH分别代表常规栽培模式和集雨栽培模式,下同。 CR, RH indicates conventional cultivation method and rain harvest cultivation method. The same below.
Fig.3 The influence of different cultivation methods on the soil moisture content of 0-80 cm soil layer
地点 Location | 品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 叶片数 Number of leaf blade | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎围 Stem circumference (cm) | 平均叶长 Average leaf length (cm) | 平均叶宽 Average leaf width (cm) | 单叶面积 Single leaf area (cm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
双龙村 Shuanglong Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 23.3a | 137.3a | 8.9b | 57.3b | 24.2b | 912.2b |
集雨RH | 23.7a | 140.7a | 10.5a | 62.1a | 27.1a | 1097.7a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 21.7a | 121.7a | 8.9a | 56.6a | 25.6a | 944.1a | |
集雨RH | 22.7a | 124.7a | 9.5a | 56.7a | 27.8a | 1067.1a | ||
赵北村 Zhaobei Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 24.3a | 153.3a | 9.9a | 56.8b | 24.1a | 910.5b |
集雨RH | 24.5a | 163.0a | 10.8a | 59.9a | 24.7a | 1017.9a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 23.0a | 121.5a | 9.3a | 54.3b | 25.9a | 933.2b | |
集雨RH | 24.0a | 138.0a | 11.1a | 58.1a | 27.0a | 1056.3a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×栽培模式 V×CM | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表2 不同栽培模式对现蕾期烟株农艺性状的影响
Table 2 Effects of different cultivation methods on agronomic traits of tobacco plants at budding stage
地点 Location | 品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 叶片数 Number of leaf blade | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎围 Stem circumference (cm) | 平均叶长 Average leaf length (cm) | 平均叶宽 Average leaf width (cm) | 单叶面积 Single leaf area (cm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
双龙村 Shuanglong Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 23.3a | 137.3a | 8.9b | 57.3b | 24.2b | 912.2b |
集雨RH | 23.7a | 140.7a | 10.5a | 62.1a | 27.1a | 1097.7a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 21.7a | 121.7a | 8.9a | 56.6a | 25.6a | 944.1a | |
集雨RH | 22.7a | 124.7a | 9.5a | 56.7a | 27.8a | 1067.1a | ||
赵北村 Zhaobei Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 24.3a | 153.3a | 9.9a | 56.8b | 24.1a | 910.5b |
集雨RH | 24.5a | 163.0a | 10.8a | 59.9a | 24.7a | 1017.9a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 23.0a | 121.5a | 9.3a | 54.3b | 25.9a | 933.2b | |
集雨RH | 24.0a | 138.0a | 11.1a | 58.1a | 27.0a | 1056.3a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×栽培模式 V×CM | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
地点 Location | 品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 茎围 Stem circumference (cm) | 平均叶长 Average leaf length (cm) | 平均叶宽 Average leaf width (cm) | 单叶面积 Single leaf area (cm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
双龙村 Shuanglong Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 10.0a | 63.6b | 26.0a | 1049.5b |
集雨RH | 12.0a | 75.5a | 29.9a | 1434.1a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 9.8a | 68.0a | 30.7a | 1326.0a | |
集雨RH | 12.2a | 70.4a | 33.6a | 1504.8a | ||
赵北村 Zhaobei Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 11.1b | 61.7a | 25.3b | 992.5b |
集雨RH | 12.9a | 69.1a | 29.9a | 1309.1a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 13.1a | 68.0a | 30.7a | 1326.0a | |
集雨RH | 13.0a | 70.4a | 33.6a | 1504.8a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×栽培模式 V×CM | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表3 不同栽培模式对平顶期烟株农艺性状的影响
Table 3 Effects of different cultivation methods on agronomic traits of tobacco plants at flat top stage
地点 Location | 品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 茎围 Stem circumference (cm) | 平均叶长 Average leaf length (cm) | 平均叶宽 Average leaf width (cm) | 单叶面积 Single leaf area (cm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
双龙村 Shuanglong Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 10.0a | 63.6b | 26.0a | 1049.5b |
集雨RH | 12.0a | 75.5a | 29.9a | 1434.1a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 9.8a | 68.0a | 30.7a | 1326.0a | |
集雨RH | 12.2a | 70.4a | 33.6a | 1504.8a | ||
赵北村 Zhaobei Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 11.1b | 61.7a | 25.3b | 992.5b |
集雨RH | 12.9a | 69.1a | 29.9a | 1309.1a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 13.1a | 68.0a | 30.7a | 1326.0a | |
集雨RH | 13.0a | 70.4a | 33.6a | 1504.8a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×栽培模式 V×CM | ns | ns | ns | ns |
地点 Location | 品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 旺长期Vigorous growth stage | 现蕾期Budding stage | 成熟期Mature stage | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根Root | 茎Stem | 叶Leaf | 单株Plant | 根Root | 茎Stem | 叶Leaf | 单株Plant | 根Root | 茎Stem | 叶Leaf | 单株Plant | |||
双龙村 Shuanglong Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 9.5b | 15.0b | 62.5b | 87.0b | 36.4a | 73.6a | 125.2b | 235.2b | 48.0b | 75.1b | 136.3b | 259.3b |
集雨RH | 17.4a | 29.8a | 104.2a | 151.4a | 42.3a | 83.9a | 159.2a | 285.4a | 80.6a | 121.6a | 212.2a | 414.4a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 10.1b | 12.2b | 60.9b | 83.2b | 31.6a | 65.5a | 143.9a | 241.1b | 52.0a | 78.8a | 151.6a | 282.4a | |
集雨RH | 14.8a | 24.8a | 96.8a | 136.5a | 41.2a | 75.1a | 158.5a | 274.9a | 78.3a | 135.4a | 184.5a | 398.2a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | * | * | ns | ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | * | ns | * | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×栽培模式V×CM | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
赵北村 Zhaobei Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 13.4b | 22.4b | 75.2b | 111.0b | 38.8a | 86.8a | 162.9a | 288.4a | 60.5a | 110.6a | 136.0a | 307.0a |
集雨RH | 19.0a | 30.2a | 96.2a | 145.5a | 46.0a | 105.5a | 160.3a | 311.8a | 78.2a | 143.7a | 171.0a | 392.9a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 9.6a | 12.6a | 53.9b | 76.0a | 40.9a | 59.4a | 150.8a | 251.0b | 54.5a | 81.0b | 148.9a | 284.4b | |
集雨RH | 12.5a | 17.6a | 72.9a | 103.0a | 50.5a | 79.5a | 176.4a | 306.3a | 56.3a | 118.3a | 161.4a | 335.9a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | * | ns | ns | * | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | * | ** | * | ||
品种×栽培模式V×CM | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表4 不同栽培模式对烟株干物质积累的影响
Table 4 Effects of different cultivation methods on dry matter accumulation of tobacco plants (g)
地点 Location | 品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 旺长期Vigorous growth stage | 现蕾期Budding stage | 成熟期Mature stage | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根Root | 茎Stem | 叶Leaf | 单株Plant | 根Root | 茎Stem | 叶Leaf | 单株Plant | 根Root | 茎Stem | 叶Leaf | 单株Plant | |||
双龙村 Shuanglong Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 9.5b | 15.0b | 62.5b | 87.0b | 36.4a | 73.6a | 125.2b | 235.2b | 48.0b | 75.1b | 136.3b | 259.3b |
集雨RH | 17.4a | 29.8a | 104.2a | 151.4a | 42.3a | 83.9a | 159.2a | 285.4a | 80.6a | 121.6a | 212.2a | 414.4a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 10.1b | 12.2b | 60.9b | 83.2b | 31.6a | 65.5a | 143.9a | 241.1b | 52.0a | 78.8a | 151.6a | 282.4a | |
集雨RH | 14.8a | 24.8a | 96.8a | 136.5a | 41.2a | 75.1a | 158.5a | 274.9a | 78.3a | 135.4a | 184.5a | 398.2a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | * | * | ns | ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | * | ns | * | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
品种×栽培模式V×CM | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
赵北村 Zhaobei Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 13.4b | 22.4b | 75.2b | 111.0b | 38.8a | 86.8a | 162.9a | 288.4a | 60.5a | 110.6a | 136.0a | 307.0a |
集雨RH | 19.0a | 30.2a | 96.2a | 145.5a | 46.0a | 105.5a | 160.3a | 311.8a | 78.2a | 143.7a | 171.0a | 392.9a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 9.6a | 12.6a | 53.9b | 76.0a | 40.9a | 59.4a | 150.8a | 251.0b | 54.5a | 81.0b | 148.9a | 284.4b | |
集雨RH | 12.5a | 17.6a | 72.9a | 103.0a | 50.5a | 79.5a | 176.4a | 306.3a | 56.3a | 118.3a | 161.4a | 335.9a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | * | ns | ns | * | ns | * | ns | ns | ns | * | ** | * | ||
品种×栽培模式V×CM | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
地点 Location | 品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 氮素含量 Nitrogen content (%) | 氮素积累量 Nitrogen accumulation amount (g·plant -1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根Root | 茎Stem | 叶Leaf | 根Root | 茎Stem | 叶Leaf | |||
双龙村 Shuanglong Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 1.51a | 1.34b | 2.18b | 0.81b | 1.04b | 2.99b |
集雨RH | 1.47b | 1.70a | 2.49a | 1.13a | 2.05a | 5.04a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 1.79a | 1.74a | 2.30a | 0.93b | 1.34b | 3.48b | |
集雨RH | 1.62b | 1.39b | 2.33a | 1.28a | 1.75a | 4.35a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | ns | ns | ns | ** | ** | ** | ||
品种×栽培模式V×CM | ns | ** | ** | ns | ** | ** | ||
赵北村 Zhaobei Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 1.44a | 1.12a | 1.99a | 0.87a | 1.20a | 2.63b |
集雨RH | 1.45a | 0.75b | 2.00a | 1.08a | 1.07a | 3.58a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 1.57a | 1.11a | 1.80a | 0.84a | 0.92a | 2.65a | |
集雨RH | 1.60a | 0.80b | 1.92a | 0.90a | 0.65a | 3.22a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | ns | ** | ns | ns | ns | * | ||
品种×栽培模式V×CM | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表5 不同栽培模式对成熟期烤烟氮素含量和氮素积累量的影响
Table 5 Effects of different cultivation methods on nitrogen content and nitrogen accumulation amount of flue-cured tobacco at mature stage
地点 Location | 品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 氮素含量 Nitrogen content (%) | 氮素积累量 Nitrogen accumulation amount (g·plant -1) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
根Root | 茎Stem | 叶Leaf | 根Root | 茎Stem | 叶Leaf | |||
双龙村 Shuanglong Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 1.51a | 1.34b | 2.18b | 0.81b | 1.04b | 2.99b |
集雨RH | 1.47b | 1.70a | 2.49a | 1.13a | 2.05a | 5.04a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 1.79a | 1.74a | 2.30a | 0.93b | 1.34b | 3.48b | |
集雨RH | 1.62b | 1.39b | 2.33a | 1.28a | 1.75a | 4.35a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | ns | ns | ns | ** | ** | ** | ||
品种×栽培模式V×CM | ns | ** | ** | ns | ** | ** | ||
赵北村 Zhaobei Village | 云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 1.44a | 1.12a | 1.99a | 0.87a | 1.20a | 2.63b |
集雨RH | 1.45a | 0.75b | 2.00a | 1.08a | 1.07a | 3.58a | ||
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 1.57a | 1.11a | 1.80a | 0.84a | 0.92a | 2.65a | |
集雨RH | 1.60a | 0.80b | 1.92a | 0.90a | 0.65a | 3.22a | ||
品种 Variety (V) | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
栽培模式 Cultivation method (CM) | ns | ** | ns | ns | ns | * | ||
品种×栽培模式V×CM | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 还原糖 Reducing sugar | 总糖 Total sugar | 总植物碱 Total alkaloids | 总氮 Total nitrogen | 钾 Potassium | 氯 Chlorine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 22.7 | 24.4 | 2.26 | 1.80 | 2.09 | 0.12 |
集雨RH | 18.8 | 20.2 | 2.33 | 2.02 | 2.23 | 0.13 | |
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 19.4 | 21.0 | 2.21 | 1.86 | 2.41 | 0.13 |
集雨RH | 19.8 | 21.7 | 1.93 | 1.76 | 2.49 | 0.14 |
表6 不同栽培模式对烤后烟叶化学成分含量的影响
Table 6 Effects of different cultivation methods on the main chemical components of flue-cured tobacco (%)
品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 还原糖 Reducing sugar | 总糖 Total sugar | 总植物碱 Total alkaloids | 总氮 Total nitrogen | 钾 Potassium | 氯 Chlorine |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 22.7 | 24.4 | 2.26 | 1.80 | 2.09 | 0.12 |
集雨RH | 18.8 | 20.2 | 2.33 | 2.02 | 2.23 | 0.13 | |
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 19.4 | 21.0 | 2.21 | 1.86 | 2.41 | 0.13 |
集雨RH | 19.8 | 21.7 | 1.93 | 1.76 | 2.49 | 0.14 |
品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 香气质 Aroma quality (15) | 香气量 Aroma volume (20) | 余味 Aftertaste (25) | 杂气 Impurity (18) | 刺激性 Irritation (12) | 燃烧性 Combustion (5) | 灰色Grey (5) | 得分Score (100) | 质量档次 Quality grade |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 11.13 | 15.88 | 18.88 | 13.00 | 8.63 | 3 | 3.25 | 73.8 | 中等+ Medium+ |
集雨RH | 11.13 | 16.13 | 19.25 | 13.25 | 8.75 | 3 | 3.25 | 74.8 | 中等+ Medium+ | |
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 11.13 | 16.00 | 19.13 | 13.50 | 8.88 | 3 | 3.25 | 74.9 | 中等+ Medium+ |
集雨RH | 11.38 | 16.38 | 19.50 | 13.63 | 8.88 | 3 | 3.25 | 76.0 | 较好- Better- |
表7 不同栽培模式对烤后烟叶感官质量的影响
Table 7 Effects of different cultivation methods on sensory quality of flue-cured tobacco
品种 Variety | 栽培模式 Cultivation method | 香气质 Aroma quality (15) | 香气量 Aroma volume (20) | 余味 Aftertaste (25) | 杂气 Impurity (18) | 刺激性 Irritation (12) | 燃烧性 Combustion (5) | 灰色Grey (5) | 得分Score (100) | 质量档次 Quality grade |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
云烟87 Yunyan 87 | 常规CR | 11.13 | 15.88 | 18.88 | 13.00 | 8.63 | 3 | 3.25 | 73.8 | 中等+ Medium+ |
集雨RH | 11.13 | 16.13 | 19.25 | 13.25 | 8.75 | 3 | 3.25 | 74.8 | 中等+ Medium+ | |
中烟100 Zhongyan 100 | 常规CR | 11.13 | 16.00 | 19.13 | 13.50 | 8.88 | 3 | 3.25 | 74.9 | 中等+ Medium+ |
集雨RH | 11.38 | 16.38 | 19.50 | 13.63 | 8.88 | 3 | 3.25 | 76.0 | 较好- Better- |
1 | Duan S H, Yang Y J, Liu J L, et al. Advance in water requirement of tobacco. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2012, 33(4): 99-105. |
段淑辉, 杨亿军, 刘建利, 等. 烟草需水规律研究进展. 中国烟草科学, 2012, 33(4): 99-105. | |
2 | Shi Y, Li X, Liu G Y, et al. Tobacco cultural practices against drought stress in Shandong Province. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2002, 23(2): 28-30. |
石屹, 李晓, 刘广玉, 等. 山东烟草抗旱栽培技术研究与应用展望. 中国烟草科学, 2002, 23(2): 28-30. | |
3 | Ren X L, Chen X L, Cai T, et al. Effects of ridge-furrow system combined with different degradable mulching materials on soil water conservation and crop production in semi-humid areas of China. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1877. |
4 | Li W W, Xiong L, Wang C J, et al. Optimized ridge-furrow with plastic film mulching system to use rainfall efficiently for winter wheat production in dry semi-humid areas. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 218: 211-221. |
5 | Chen Y Z, Chai S X, Tian H H, et al. Straw strips mulch on furrows improves water use efficiency and yield of potato in a rainfed semiarid area. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 211: 142-151. |
6 | Ren X L, Jia Z K, Ding R X, et al. Progress and prospect of research on root-zone water micro-collecting farming for crop in arid region of China. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2010, 28(3): 83-89. |
任小龙, 贾志宽, 丁瑞霞, 等. 我国旱区作物根域微集水种植技术研究进展及展望. 干旱地区农业研究, 2010, 28(3): 83-89. | |
7 | Ren X L, Jia Z K, Chen X L, et al. Effects of ridge and furrow planting for rainfall harvesting on photo-synthetic characteristics and yield in corn in semi-arid regions. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008, 34(5): 838-845. |
任小龙, 贾志宽, 陈小莉, 等. 半干旱区沟垄集雨对玉米光合特性及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2008, 34(5): 838-845. | |
8 | Li Y L, Zhang P, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of rainfall harvesting planting on temporal and spatial changing of soil water and temperature, and yield of spring maize(Zea mays L.) in semi-arid areas. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(6): 1084-1096. |
李玉玲, 张鹏, 张艳, 等. 旱区集雨种植方式对土壤水分、温度的时空变化及春玉米产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(6): 1084-1096. | |
9 | Xiao J B, Sun Z X, Jiang C G, et al. Effect of ridge film mulching technique and furrow seeding of spring corn on water use and yield in semi-arid region in Liaoxi area. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(10): 1917-1928. |
肖继兵, 孙占祥, 蒋春光, 等. 辽西半干旱区垄膜沟种方式对春玉米水分利用和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(10): 1917-1928. | |
10 | Zhang X D, Kamran M, Xue X K, et al. Ridge-furrow mulching system drives the efficient utilization of key production resources and the improvement of maize productivity in the Loess Plateau of China. Soil & Tillage Research, 2019, 190: 10-21. |
11 | Nelson D W, Somers L E. Determination of total nitrogen in plant material. Agronomy Journal, 1973, 65: 109-112. |
12 | Xu J, Guo Z Y, Li Z M, et al. Stable oxygen isotope analysis of the water uptake mechanism via the roots in spring maize under the ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting system in a semi-arid region. Agricultural Water Management, 2021, 252: 106879. |
13 | Xing Y, Zhang K P, Wang Z Y, et al. Responses of soil moisture and photosynthetic characteristics to mulching materials and ridge-to-furrow ratios in rapeseed fields in southwest dryland of China.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(10): 3461-3472. |
邢毅, 张抗萍, 王志远, 等. 西南旱地油菜田土壤水分和作物光合特征对覆盖材料和垄沟比的响应. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10): 3461-3472. | |
14 | Zhang Y, Han Q F, Cheng X F, et al. Effects of ridge and furrow rain harvesting with supplemental irrigation on winter wheat photosynthetic characteristics, yield and water use efficiency in Guanzhong irrigation district. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2015, 26(5): 1382-1390. |
张玉, 韩清芳, 成雪峰, 等. 关中灌区沟垄集雨种植补灌对冬小麦光合特征、产量及水分利用效率的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(5): 1382-1390. | |
15 | Han J, Jia Z K, Ren X L, et al. Effect of water micro-collecting planting on corn (Zea mays L.) photosynthesis rate and water use efficiency under simulated rainfall conditions. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2008, 26(1): 81-85, 101. |
韩娟, 贾志宽, 任小龙, 等. 模拟降雨量下微集水种植对玉米光合速率及水分利用效率的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2008, 26(1): 81-85, 101. | |
16 | Shi Y Y, Ma Z H, Wu C H, et al. Effects of ridge tillage with film mulching in furrow on photosynthetic characteristics of potato and yield formation in dryland farming. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297. |
石艳艳, 马志花, 吴春花, 等. 垄作沟覆地膜对旱地马铃薯光合特性及产量形成的影响. 作物学报, 2022, 48(5): 1288-1297. | |
17 | Zhang X D, Zhao J, Yang L C, et al. Ridge-furrow mulching system regulates diurnal temperature amplitude and wetting-drying alternation behavior in soil to promote maize growth and water use in a semiarid region. Field Crops Research, 2019, 233: 121-130. |
18 | Hu Q, Tan Y, Yang P Y, et al. Effects of different ridge and furrow widths for rainwater harvesting on the potato at ecotone region in the north foot of Yinshan Mountain. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2017, 31(11): 116-121. |
胡琦, 谭英, 杨鹏宇, 等. 阴山北麓农牧交错带不同沟垄宽度集雨技术对马铃薯的影响. 干旱区资源与环境, 2017, 31(11): 116-121. | |
19 | Ma X H, Yuan J M, Rong F F, et al. Effects of nitrogen application on nitrogen accumulation, distribution and soil nitrogen mineralization. Chinese Tobacco Science, 2011, 32(1): 17-21. |
马兴华, 苑举民, 荣凡番, 等. 施氮对烤烟氮素积累、分配及土壤氮素矿化的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2011, 32(1): 17-21. | |
20 | Ma X H, Guan E S, Wang Y, et al. Effect of postponing N application on nitrogen uptake, utilization and leaf quality of flue-cured tobacco. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2018, 34(1): 36-40. |
马兴华, 管恩森, 王永, 等. 氮肥后移对烤烟氮素吸收、利用及品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2018, 34(1): 36-40. | |
21 | Zhang P L, Guo T W, Liu X W, et al. Effect of plant density and nitrogen application rate on yield, nitrogen and water use efficiencies of spring maize under whole plastic-film mulching and double-furrow sowing. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(4): 579-590. |
张平良, 郭天文, 刘晓伟, 等. 密度和施氮量互作对全膜双垄沟播玉米产量、氮素和水分利用效率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(4): 579-590. | |
22 | Li W W. Effect of furrow-to-ridge ratios in ridge-furrow mulching system on dry land spring maize growth and soil carbon emission. Xianyang: Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University, 2019. |
李伟玮. 沟垄集雨栽培模式下沟垄比对旱作春玉米生长及土壤碳排放的影响. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2019. | |
23 | Wen J C, Jing Y S. Research progress on the relationship between tobacco chemical composition and meteorological factors. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 48(4): 1-8. |
文建川, 景元书. 烟草化学成分与气象因子关系研究进展. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(4): 1-8. | |
24 | Li Z L. Effect of different soil moisture on the growth, quality and yield of flue-cured tobacco at the maturity. Zhengzhou: Henan Agricultural University, 2012. |
李祖良. 成熟期不同土壤水分状况对烤烟生长发育及品质和产量的影响. 郑州: 河南农业大学, 2012. | |
25 | Han J F, Wang Y F, Yang S Q. Effect of drought stress on chemical components and main aroma matter content of flue-cured tobacco. China Tobacco, 1994(1): 35-38. |
韩锦峰, 汪耀富, 杨素勤. 干旱胁迫对烤烟化学成分和香气物质含量的影响. 中国烟草, 1994(1): 35-38. | |
26 | Kang X P, Fan Y, Wang J Q, et al. Effect of irrigation methods on quality, yield and water use efficiency of flue-cured tobacco. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2015, 34(12): 104-111. |
康小平, 樊毅, 王君勤, 等. 不同灌溉方式下水分调控对烤烟品质和产量及水分利用效率的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2015, 34(12): 104-111. | |
27 | Çakir R, Çebi U. The effect of irrigation scheduling and water stress on the maturity and chemical composition of Virginia tobacco leaf. Field Crops Research, 2010, 119: 269-276. |
[1] | 周大梁, 石薇, 蒋紫薇, 魏正业, 梁欢欢, 贾倩民. 沟垄集雨下密度和施氮对黄土高原青贮玉米叶片酶活性及水氮利用的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(8): 126-143. |
[2] | 张家驹, 于洁, 李明娜, 康俊梅, 杨青川, 龙瑞才. 蒺藜苜蓿lncRNA167及其剪切产物miR167c的鉴定和功能分析[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(1): 164-180. |
[3] | 冯军, 石超, 门胜男, Hafiz Athar Hussain, 柯剑鸿, Linna Cholidah, 陈锦芬, 郭欣, 武海燕, 冉泰霖, 向信华, 王龙昌. 不同降雨下旱地油菜节水节肥技术对土壤养分及酶活性的调控效应[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 51-62. |
[4] | 陈德霞, 刘旭, 罗林华, 黄训兵, 吕慎金, 李广阅, 张泽华. 典型草原4种优势种牧草次生代谢物对亚洲小车蝗解毒酶活性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(1): 183-192. |
[5] | 刘领, 李冬, 马宜林, 王丽君, 赵世民, 周俊学, 申洪涛, 王艳芳. 外源褪黑素对干旱胁迫下烤烟幼苗生长的缓解效应与生理机制研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(8): 95-105. |
[6] | 莫负涛, 李发弟, 王维民, 喇永富, 张小雪, 刘婷, 唐德富, 乐祥鹏, 李飞, 李冲, 李万宏, 肖金玉, 谭建华, 武得虎. 西北寒旱地区舍饲湖羊生长发育特征研究[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(1): 168-177. |
[7] | 赵锐明,孙连虎,郭凤霞,陈垣,田生华. 移栽密度对红芪生长发育及药材产量和质量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(3): 167-174. |
[8] | 张喜峰,张立新,高梅,韦成才,马英明,王平平,耿伟. 不同氮肥形态和腐殖酸对陕西典型生态区烤烟化学成分和产质量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(6): 60-67. |
[9] | 回振龙,李朝周,史文煊,张俊莲,王蒂. 黄腐酸改善连作马铃薯生长发育及抗性生理的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(4): 130-136. |
[10] | 蔡仕珍,李西,潘远智,李璟,胡庭兴,叶充. 不同光照对蝴蝶花光合特性及生长发育研究[J]. 草业学报, 2013, 22(2): 264-272. |
[11] | 鲁黎明,朱靓,雷强,叶利华,杜卫民. 四川烤烟主产区烟叶感官质量及主要化学成分分析[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(4): 88-97. |
[12] | 孟季蒙,李卫军. 地下滴灌对苜蓿的生长发育与种子产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(1): 291-295. |
[13] | 刘星,邱慧珍,张文明,李亚娟,滕桂香,贾欢欢 (1.甘肃农业大学资源与环境学院,甘肃 兰州 730070;2.甘肃农业大学草业学院,甘肃 兰州 730070). 微生物有机肥对陇东烤烟中性致香物质含量的影响及其机理初探[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(5): 79-86. |
[14] | 蔡仕珍,李璟,潘远智,陈其兵,姜贝贝,叶充. 不同种植密度对乌头生长发育的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 278-282. |
[15] | 胡娟,邱慧珍,何秀成,张文明,李亚娟,张春红. 施钾水平对甘肃烤烟钾含量及经济效益的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(5): 156-160. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||