紫花苜蓿与醉马草的竞争效应

草业学报 ›› 2012, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 59-65.

紫花苜蓿与醉马草的竞争效应

黄玺,李春杰^*,南志标

草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室兰州大学草地农业科技学院,甘肃兰州 730020

出版日期:2012-02-20 发布日期:2012-02-20
通讯作者: E-mail:chunjie@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:黄玺(1986-),男,甘肃兰州人,在读硕士。
*通讯作者。
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究973项目(2007CB108902),国家自然科学基金(30771531),教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-08-0256)和兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(lzujbky-2012-K01)资助。

Competitive effects between Medicago sativa and Achnatherum inebrians

HUANG Xi, LI Chun-jie, NAN Zhi-biao

State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-ecosystems, College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730020, China

Online:2012-02-20 Published:2012-02-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究了紫花苜蓿与醉马草两者之间的种间竞争效应,结果表明,紫花苜蓿的单株生物量、相对产量(RY)和竞争平衡指数(CB)均显著高于醉马草的对应指标,竞争效应参数相对产量总和(RYT)显著小于1;随着各处理种植密度的增大,上述指标愈加明显。在4,8和12株/盆密度条件下,醉马草单株总生物量比其在单种处理时对应密度下的单株生物量分别降低了38.5%,41.4%和56.0%,而紫花苜蓿单株生物量在混种时降低不明显。说明紫花苜蓿对醉马草具有持续的强烈的竞争抑制作用,在长期的竞争演替中,醉马草可能被紫花苜蓿替代。

Abstract: Through studying the effects of interspecific competition between Medicago sativa and Achnatherum inebrians, the results indicated the total biomass, relative yield and competitive balance index of M. sativa were significantly higher than those of A. inebrians, the relative yield total was significantly lower than 1. The relationships mentioned above become more obvious with decreasing of experimental plant community densities. The total biomass of A.inebrians at the densities of 4, 8 and 12 plants/pot in mixture decreased by 38.5%, 41.4% and 56.0% compared to those in monoculture, respectively. However, the total biomass of M. sativa at the same density between monoculture and mixture showed no significant difference.The relative competitive ability of M. sativa was higher, it will be a promising strategy for replacement control of A.inebrians by using M. sativa as a competitor.

中图分类号:

黄玺,李春杰,南志标. 紫花苜蓿与醉马草的竞争效应[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(1): 59-65.

HUANG Xi, LI Chun-jie, NAN Zhi-biao. Competitive effects between Medicago sativa and Achnatherum inebrians[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(1): 59-65.

参考文献

史志诚. 中国草地重要有毒植物. 北京:中国农业出版社,1997: 166-176.
邓凯东, 彭海宏, 李文蓉, 等. 尿素氨化醉马草的麦角新碱含量及其营养价值. 草业科学, 1998, 15(4): 10-13.
萨赫都拉·霍曼. 醉马草及其防治措施. 草业科学, 1992, 9(5): 36-37.
任继周, 贾宗周. 焚烧对醉马草丛的效果. 甘肃农业大学学报, 1961, 7(2): 18-23.
杨文忠, 仁青, 彭毛. 草甘膦灭除醉马草试验报告. 青海草业, 2000, 9(2): 7-8.
佘宇平, 梁家社, 何大愚. 紫茎泽兰防除方法的进展. 杂草学报, 1988, 2(2): 39-40.
马春晖, 夏艳军, 韩军, 等. 不同青贮添加剂对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响. 草业学报, 2010, 19(1): 128-133.
奎嘉祥, 钟声, 匡崇义. 云南牧草品种与资源. 昆明: 云南科技出版社, 2003.
孙启忠. 我国西北地区苜蓿种子产业化发展优势与对策. 草业科学, 2000, 17(2): 65-69.
李玉山. 苜蓿生产力动态及其水分生态环境效应. 土壤学报, 2002, 39(3): 403-411.
李学森, 任继生, 冯克明, 等. 醉马草生态控制的研究. 草业学报, 1996, 5(2): 14-17.
De Wit C T. On Competition. Verslagen Landbouwkundige Onderzoekigen, 1960: 1-82.
Fowler N. Competition and coexistence in a North Carolina grasslandⅢ, Mixtures of component species. Journal of Ecology, 1982, 70: 77-92.
Wilson J B. Shoot competition and root competition. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1988, 25: 279-296.
Grace J B, Tilman D. Perspectives on Plant Competition. London: Academic Press, 1990.
Keddy P, Nielsen K, Weiher E, et al. Relative competitive performance of 63 species of terrestrial herbaceous plants. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2002, 13: 5-16.
杜国祯, 王刚, 赵松岭. 两种一年生植物在替代试验中的相互竞争关系. 草业学报, 1993, 2(1): 6-14.
Williams A C, McCarthy B C. A new index of interspecific competition for replacement and additive designs. Ecological Research, 2001, 16: 19-40.
Wilson S D, Keddy P A. Species competitive ability and position along a natural stress/disturbance gradient. Ecology, 1986, 67: 1236-1242.
李博. 植物竞争: 作物与杂草相互作用的实验研究. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001.
Watkinson A R. Density dependence in single-species populations of plants. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1980, 83: 354-357.
Austin M P, Fresco L F M, Nicholis A O. Competition and relative yield: Estimation and integration at different densities and under various nutrient concentrations using Silybum marianum and Cirisium vulgare. Journal of Ecology, 1988, 76: 157-171.
Grime J P. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes. London: Wiley, 1979.
Miller D A. Allelopathy in forage crop system. Agronmy Journal, 1996, 88: 854-859.
Dornbos D L, Spencer G F, Miller R W. Medicarpin delays alfalfa seed germination and seedling growth. Crop Science, 1990, 30: 162-166.
黄玺, 李春杰, 南志标, 等. 醉马草内生真菌对其伴生种硬质早熟禾和针茅生长的影响. 草业学报, 2010, 19(5): 87-93.
杨松, 李春杰, 柴青,等. 披碱草内生真菌对三种草坪草种子与种苗的化感效应. 草业学报, 2010, 19(4): 33-40.
White T A, Campbell B D, Kemp P D. Invasion of temperate grassland by a subtropical annual grass across an experimental matrix of water stress and disturbance. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1997, 8: 847-854.
Kolb A, Alpert P, Enters D, et al. Patterns of invasion within a grassland community. Journal of Ecology, 2002, 90: 871-881.
Weihe P E, Neely R K. The effects of shading on competition between purple loosestrife and broadleaved cattail. Aquatic Botany, 1997, 59: 127-138.

[1]	张前兵,艾尼娃尔·艾合买提,于磊,鲁为华,常青. 绿洲区不同灌溉方式及灌溉量对苜蓿田土壤盐分运移的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 69-77.
[2]	王绍飞,罗永聪,张新全,黄琳凯,马啸,刘恋. 14个多花黑麦草品种(系)在川西南地区生产性能综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 87-94.
[3]	王勇,原现军,郭刚,闻爱友,王坚,肖慎华,余成群,巴桑,邵涛. 西藏不同饲草全混合日粮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的研究[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 95-102.
[4]	王鸿泽,王之盛,康坤,邹华围,申俊华,胡瑞. 玉米粉和乳酸菌对甘薯蔓、酒糟及稻草混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 103-110.
[5]	覃方锉,赵桂琴,焦婷,韩永杰,侯建杰,宋旭东. 含水量及添加剂对燕麦捆裹青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 119-125.
[6]	邱小燕,原现军,郭刚,闻爱友,余成群,巴桑,邵涛. 添加糖蜜和乙酸对西藏发酵全混合日粮青贮发酵品质及有氧稳定性影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 111-118.
[7]	史传奇,刘玫,王臣,张欣欣,程薪宇. 东北野豌豆族植物叶形态结构的研究及其分类学意义[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 157-166.
[8]	韩宝贺,朱宏. 镉胁迫对白三叶的富集能力、叶片显微结构及其生理特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 167-175.
[9]	刘会杰,李胜,马绍英,张品南,时振振,杨晓明. H₂O₂胁迫下豌豆初生根及抗氧化酶系统对外源Ca²⁺的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 189-197.
[10]	张军,宋丽莉,郭东林,郭长虹,束永俊. MADS-box基因家族在蒺藜苜蓿的全基因组分析[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 233-241.
[11]	康俊梅,张铁军,王梦颖,张怡,杨青川. 紫花苜蓿QTL与全基因组选择研究进展及其应用[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 304-312.
[12]	李君临,张新全,玉柱,郭旭生,孟祥坤,罗燕,闫艳红. 含水量和乳酸菌添加剂对多花黑麦草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 342-348.
[13]	漆婧华,张峰,王莺,孙国钧. 黄土高原半干旱区覆膜玉米农田氮变化动态研究[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5): 13-23.
[14]	田晨霞,张咏梅,王凯,张万. 紫花苜蓿组织解剖结构对NaHCO₃盐碱胁迫的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5): 133-142.
[15]	孙红,于应文,马向丽,牟晓明,廖加法. 黔西北岩溶区九种灌木综合营养价值评价[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5): 99-106.