草业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 72-80.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020089
收稿日期:
2020-03-05
修回日期:
2020-03-30
出版日期:
2021-01-20
发布日期:
2021-01-08
作者简介:
张帆(1977-),女, 辽宁昌图人,副研究员,博士。E-mail: zhangfan898@sina.com
基金资助:
Received:
2020-03-05
Revised:
2020-03-30
Online:
2021-01-20
Published:
2021-01-08
摘要:
稻草还田和冬种绿肥是维持稻田地力和化肥替代的重要方式之一。本研究以在湖南酸性红黄泥和碱性紫潮泥两种典型稻田土壤上进行了2年的紫云英-双季稻定位试验为对象,分析紫云英和双季稻秸秆协同利用对稻田土壤K循环的影响。两土壤试验处理一致,包括稻田冬闲(FRR)、冬种紫云英(MvRR)及冬种紫云英与水稻秸秆协同利用(MvRR+St)3个处理。结果表明:与冬闲和冬种紫云英相比,紫云英与水稻秸秆协同利用未影响红黄泥土壤各形态钾的含量,但显著提高紫潮泥土壤速效钾和非交换性钾的含量,其中紫潮泥土壤水溶性钾、非特殊吸附钾及特殊吸附钾的含量较冬种紫云英处理分别提高了134.0%、93.0%、73.4%;两种典型稻田土壤上紫云英与水稻秸秆协同利用显著提高下茬作物紫云英的全K含量及吸K量,且紫云英的吸K量为紫潮泥>红黄泥;两种典型稻田土壤上冬种紫云英与水稻秸秆协同利用均未影响早、晚稻产量及籽粒K积累;在稻田各种植季和周年目前的K投入水平下,两种典型稻田土壤上冬种紫云英与水稻秸秆协同利用处理均存在K盈余(红黄泥K盈余量为401.15 kg·hm-2、紫潮泥K盈余量为403.42 kg·hm-2),说明冬种紫云英与水稻秸秆协同利用能减少双季稻生产中的化学钾肥投入量。综上所述,紫云英和双季稻秸秆协同利用有益于稻田土壤的K循环与平衡。
张帆, 杨茜. 紫云英与双季稻秸秆协同利用影响稻田土壤钾循环与平衡[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(1): 72-80.
Fan ZHANG, Qian YANG. Effects of co-utilization of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw on the potassium cycle and potassium balance in a paddy soil[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(1): 72-80.
土壤Soil | 处理 Treatments | 全钾 Total K (g·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K (mg·kg-1) | 水溶性钾 Water-soluble K (mg·kg-1) | 非特殊吸附钾 Non-specifically absorbed K (mg·kg-1) | 特殊吸附钾 Specifically absorbed K (mg·kg-1) | 非交换性钾 Non-exchangeable K (mg·kg-1) | 矿物钾 Structural K (g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | FRR | 11.40±0.44a | 49.47±12.89a | 5.30±1.73a | 9.13±4.67a | 35.07±6.52a | 142.57±7.29a | 11.27±0.42a |
MvRR | 11.45±0.23a | 76.07±18.76a | 8.90±2.04a | 18.87±8.80a | 48.30±8.34a | 149.13±4.59a | 11.27±0.23a | |
MvRR+St | 11.40±0.35a | 77.43±28.37a | 8.90±3.46a | 21.37±12.48a | 47.13±12.41a | 146.03±4.01a | 11.17±0.40a | |
紫潮泥 Purple alluvial soil | FRR | 20.67±0.21b | 82.30±4.69b | 9.70±1.50b | 22.53±2.87b | 50.07±1.70b | 370.67±10.40b | 20.27±0.21b |
MvRR | 20.83±0.40b | 84.20±4.10b | 9.20±1.00b | 24.37±0.95b | 50.60±2.56b | 366.23±3.61b | 20.27±0.45b | |
MvRR+St | 21.73±0.55a | 156.30±7.69a | 21.53±1.16a | 47.03±3.75a | 87.73±3.93a | 401.87±5.83a | 21.27±0.55a |
表1 紫云英与水稻秸秆协同利用对土壤各形态钾的影响
Table 1 Effects of synergistic utilization of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw on different soil K forms in paddy soil
土壤Soil | 处理 Treatments | 全钾 Total K (g·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K (mg·kg-1) | 水溶性钾 Water-soluble K (mg·kg-1) | 非特殊吸附钾 Non-specifically absorbed K (mg·kg-1) | 特殊吸附钾 Specifically absorbed K (mg·kg-1) | 非交换性钾 Non-exchangeable K (mg·kg-1) | 矿物钾 Structural K (g·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | FRR | 11.40±0.44a | 49.47±12.89a | 5.30±1.73a | 9.13±4.67a | 35.07±6.52a | 142.57±7.29a | 11.27±0.42a |
MvRR | 11.45±0.23a | 76.07±18.76a | 8.90±2.04a | 18.87±8.80a | 48.30±8.34a | 149.13±4.59a | 11.27±0.23a | |
MvRR+St | 11.40±0.35a | 77.43±28.37a | 8.90±3.46a | 21.37±12.48a | 47.13±12.41a | 146.03±4.01a | 11.17±0.40a | |
紫潮泥 Purple alluvial soil | FRR | 20.67±0.21b | 82.30±4.69b | 9.70±1.50b | 22.53±2.87b | 50.07±1.70b | 370.67±10.40b | 20.27±0.21b |
MvRR | 20.83±0.40b | 84.20±4.10b | 9.20±1.00b | 24.37±0.95b | 50.60±2.56b | 366.23±3.61b | 20.27±0.45b | |
MvRR+St | 21.73±0.55a | 156.30±7.69a | 21.53±1.16a | 47.03±3.75a | 87.73±3.93a | 401.87±5.83a | 21.27±0.55a |
土壤 Soil | 处理 Treatments | 紫云英Chinese milk vetch | 早稻Early rice | 晚稻Late rice | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生物量 Biomass (kg·hm-2) | 全K Total K (g·kg-1) | K吸收 K uptake (kg·hm-2) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | 全K Total K (g·kg-1) | K积累K accumulation (kg·hm-2) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | 全K Total K (g·kg-1) | K积累K accumulation (kg·hm-2) | ||
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | FRR | 5771±1112a | 3.37±0.27a | 19.48±4.59a | 5779±2054a | 3.30±0.15ab | 19.13±6.45a | |||
MvRR | 6231±291a | 14.77±4.64b | 92.02±28.63b | 5778±1211a | 3.30±0.22a | 18.96±3.37a | 5573±810a | 3.27±0.06b | 18.21±2.52a | |
MvRR+St | 7106±1652a | 24.90±2.81a | 175.80±38.50a | 6062±1760a | 3.23±0.16a | 19.70±4.63a | 5559±602a | 3.63±0.12a | 20.20±2.20a | |
紫潮泥 Purple alluvial soil | FRR | 5997±1253a | 3.16±0.15a | 18.86±3.29a | 6348±1349a | 3.10±0.17a | 19.53±3.24a | |||
MvRR | 6442±564a | 19.77±0.49b | 127.27±10.76b | 6392±430a | 3.17±0.05a | 20.34±1.26a | 4813±1218a | 3.27±0.06a | 15.71±3.95a | |
MvRR+St | 7458±602a | 30.93±1.35a | 230.65±20.33a | 6429±15a | 3.18±0.14a | 20.44±0.91a | 5552±1124a | 3.30±0.00a | 18.32±3.71a |
表2 紫云英与水稻秸秆协同利用处理对各作物种植季经济目标产量及K含量的影响
Table 2 Effects of co-utilization of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw on economic target yield and K content in each crop planting season
土壤 Soil | 处理 Treatments | 紫云英Chinese milk vetch | 早稻Early rice | 晚稻Late rice | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
生物量 Biomass (kg·hm-2) | 全K Total K (g·kg-1) | K吸收 K uptake (kg·hm-2) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | 全K Total K (g·kg-1) | K积累K accumulation (kg·hm-2) | 产量 Yield (kg·hm-2) | 全K Total K (g·kg-1) | K积累K accumulation (kg·hm-2) | ||
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | FRR | 5771±1112a | 3.37±0.27a | 19.48±4.59a | 5779±2054a | 3.30±0.15ab | 19.13±6.45a | |||
MvRR | 6231±291a | 14.77±4.64b | 92.02±28.63b | 5778±1211a | 3.30±0.22a | 18.96±3.37a | 5573±810a | 3.27±0.06b | 18.21±2.52a | |
MvRR+St | 7106±1652a | 24.90±2.81a | 175.80±38.50a | 6062±1760a | 3.23±0.16a | 19.70±4.63a | 5559±602a | 3.63±0.12a | 20.20±2.20a | |
紫潮泥 Purple alluvial soil | FRR | 5997±1253a | 3.16±0.15a | 18.86±3.29a | 6348±1349a | 3.10±0.17a | 19.53±3.24a | |||
MvRR | 6442±564a | 19.77±0.49b | 127.27±10.76b | 6392±430a | 3.17±0.05a | 20.34±1.26a | 4813±1218a | 3.27±0.06a | 15.71±3.95a | |
MvRR+St | 7458±602a | 30.93±1.35a | 230.65±20.33a | 6429±15a | 3.18±0.14a | 20.44±0.91a | 5552±1124a | 3.30±0.00a | 18.32±3.71a |
土壤 Soil | 处理 Treatments | 输入Input | 输出 Output | 表观平衡 Balance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
前茬晚稻秸秆 Previous late rice straw | 紫云英种子 Chinese milk vetch seed | 合计 Total | 紫云英吸收 Chinese milk vetch uptake | |||
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | MvRR | 0.16 | 0.16 | 92.02b | -91.85 | |
MvRR+St | 216.80 | 0.16 | 216.96 | 175.80a | 41.16 | |
紫潮泥 Purple alluvial soil | MvRR | 0.16 | 0.16 | 127.27b | -127.11 | |
MvRR+St | 217.94 | 0.16 | 218.10 | 230.65a | -12.55 |
表3 紫云英种植季稻田土壤K的输入输出
Table 3 K input-output of two typical paddy soils system in Chinese milk vetch planting season (kg·hm-2)
土壤 Soil | 处理 Treatments | 输入Input | 输出 Output | 表观平衡 Balance | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
前茬晚稻秸秆 Previous late rice straw | 紫云英种子 Chinese milk vetch seed | 合计 Total | 紫云英吸收 Chinese milk vetch uptake | |||
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | MvRR | 0.16 | 0.16 | 92.02b | -91.85 | |
MvRR+St | 216.80 | 0.16 | 216.96 | 175.80a | 41.16 | |
紫潮泥 Purple alluvial soil | MvRR | 0.16 | 0.16 | 127.27b | -127.11 | |
MvRR+St | 217.94 | 0.16 | 218.10 | 230.65a | -12.55 |
土壤 Soil | 处理 Treatments | 输入Input | 输出 Output | 平衡 Balance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
化肥 Chemical fertilizer | 早稻秧苗 Early rice seedling | 紫云英 Chinese milk vetch | 合计 Total | 早稻籽粒 Rice seed | 早稻秸秆 Early rice straw | 早稻植株地下部分Early rice root | 水稻吸收 Uptake of early rice | |||
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | FRR | 74.68 | 19.88 | 94.56 | 19.48a | 135.16a | 10.36b | 165.00 | -70.44 | |
MvRR | 74.68 | 19.88 | 92.02 | 186.58 | 18.96a | 138.97a | 11.68ab | 169.61 | 16.97 | |
MvRR+St | 74.68 | 19.88 | 175.80 | 270.36 | 19.70a | 152.05a | 17.68a | 189.43 | 80.93 | |
紫朝泥 Purple alluvial soil | FRR | 74.68 | 19.88 | 94.56 | 18.86a | 123.00a | 11.38a | 153.24 | -58.68 | |
MvRR | 74.68 | 19.88 | 127.27 | 221.83 | 20.23a | 146.48a | 9.72a | 176.43 | 45.40 | |
MvRR+St | 74.68 | 19.88 | 230.65 | 325.21 | 20.44a | 146.87a | 13.89a | 181.20 | 144.01 |
表4 早稻种植季稻田土壤K的输入输出
Table 4 K input-output of two typical paddy soils system in early rice planting season (kg·hm-2)
土壤 Soil | 处理 Treatments | 输入Input | 输出 Output | 平衡 Balance | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
化肥 Chemical fertilizer | 早稻秧苗 Early rice seedling | 紫云英 Chinese milk vetch | 合计 Total | 早稻籽粒 Rice seed | 早稻秸秆 Early rice straw | 早稻植株地下部分Early rice root | 水稻吸收 Uptake of early rice | |||
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | FRR | 74.68 | 19.88 | 94.56 | 19.48a | 135.16a | 10.36b | 165.00 | -70.44 | |
MvRR | 74.68 | 19.88 | 92.02 | 186.58 | 18.96a | 138.97a | 11.68ab | 169.61 | 16.97 | |
MvRR+St | 74.68 | 19.88 | 175.80 | 270.36 | 19.70a | 152.05a | 17.68a | 189.43 | 80.93 | |
紫朝泥 Purple alluvial soil | FRR | 74.68 | 19.88 | 94.56 | 18.86a | 123.00a | 11.38a | 153.24 | -58.68 | |
MvRR | 74.68 | 19.88 | 127.27 | 221.83 | 20.23a | 146.48a | 9.72a | 176.43 | 45.40 | |
MvRR+St | 74.68 | 19.88 | 230.65 | 325.21 | 20.44a | 146.87a | 13.89a | 181.20 | 144.01 |
土壤 Soil | 处理 Treatments | 输入Input | 输出 Output | 平衡 Balance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
化肥 Chemical fertilizer | 晚稻秧苗 Late rice seedling | 早稻植株地下部分 Early rice root | 早稻秸秆 Early rice straw | 合计 Total | 晚稻 籽粒 Late rice | 晚稻秸秆 Late rice straw | 晚稻植株地下部分 Late rice root | 晚稻吸收Uptake of late rice | |||
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | FRR | 99.57 | 29.96 | 10.36 | 139.89 | 19.13a | 188.19a | 15.24a | 222.56 | -82.67 | |
MvRR | 99.57 | 29.96 | 11.68 | 141.21 | 18.21a | 188.73a | 18.59a | 225.53 | -84.34 | ||
MvRR+St | 99.57 | 29.96 | 17.68 | 152.05 | 299.26 | 20.20a | 222.93a | 21.18a | 264.31 | 34.95 | |
紫朝泥 Purple alluvial soil | FRR | 99.57 | 29.96 | 11.38 | 140.91 | 19.53a | 200.41a | 24.91a | 244.85 | -103.94 | |
MvRR | 99.57 | 29.96 | 9.72 | 139.25 | 15.71a | 182.38a | 24.99a | 223.08 | -83.83 | ||
MvRR+St | 99.57 | 29.96 | 13.89 | 146.87 | 290.29 | 18.32a | 199.88a | 23.26a | 241.46 | 48.83 |
表5 晚稻种植季稻田土壤K的输入输出
Table 5 K input-output of two typical paddy soils system in late rice planting season (kg·hm-2)
土壤 Soil | 处理 Treatments | 输入Input | 输出 Output | 平衡 Balance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
化肥 Chemical fertilizer | 晚稻秧苗 Late rice seedling | 早稻植株地下部分 Early rice root | 早稻秸秆 Early rice straw | 合计 Total | 晚稻 籽粒 Late rice | 晚稻秸秆 Late rice straw | 晚稻植株地下部分 Late rice root | 晚稻吸收Uptake of late rice | |||
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | FRR | 99.57 | 29.96 | 10.36 | 139.89 | 19.13a | 188.19a | 15.24a | 222.56 | -82.67 | |
MvRR | 99.57 | 29.96 | 11.68 | 141.21 | 18.21a | 188.73a | 18.59a | 225.53 | -84.34 | ||
MvRR+St | 99.57 | 29.96 | 17.68 | 152.05 | 299.26 | 20.20a | 222.93a | 21.18a | 264.31 | 34.95 | |
紫朝泥 Purple alluvial soil | FRR | 99.57 | 29.96 | 11.38 | 140.91 | 19.53a | 200.41a | 24.91a | 244.85 | -103.94 | |
MvRR | 99.57 | 29.96 | 9.72 | 139.25 | 15.71a | 182.38a | 24.99a | 223.08 | -83.83 | ||
MvRR+St | 99.57 | 29.96 | 13.89 | 146.87 | 290.29 | 18.32a | 199.88a | 23.26a | 241.46 | 48.83 |
土壤 Soil | 处理 Treatments | 输入 Input (kg·hm-2) | 输出 Output (kg·hm-2) | 归还Return (kg·hm-2) | 归还/输入 Return/Input | 表观 平衡 Balance (kg·hm-2) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
前茬晚稻秸秆 Previous late rice straw | 紫云英 种子 Chinese milk vetch seed | 双季稻秧苗 Rice seedling | 化肥 Chemical fertilizer | 合计 Total | 双季稻籽粒 Rice seed | 双季稻秸秆 Rice straw | 合计 Total | 双季稻植株地下部分 Rice root | 双季稻秸秆 Rice straw | 紫云英 Chinses milk vetch | 合计 Total | ||||
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | FRR | 49.84 | 174.25 | 224.09 | 38.61 | 323.35 | 361.96 | 25.60 | 25.60 | 0.11 | -137.87 | ||||
MvRR | 0.16 | 49.84 | 174.25 | 224.25 | 37.17 | 327.70 | 364.87 | 30.27 | 92.02 | 122.29 | 0.55 | -140.62 | |||
MvRR+St | 216.80 | 0.16 | 49.84 | 174.25 | 441.05 | 39.90 | 39.90 | 38.86 | 374.98 | 175.80 | 589.64 | 1.34 | 401.15 | ||
紫朝泥 Purple alluvial soil | FRR | 49.84 | 174.25 | 224.09 | 38.39 | 323.41 | 361.80 | 36.29 | 36.29 | 0.16 | -137.71 | ||||
MvRR | 0.16 | 49.84 | 174.25 | 224.25 | 35.94 | 328.86 | 364.80 | 34.71 | 127.27 | 161.98 | 0.72 | -140.55 | |||
MvRR+St | 217.94 | 0.16 | 49.84 | 174.25 | 442.19 | 38.77 | 38.77 | 37.15 | 346.75 | 230.65 | 614.55 | 1.39 | 403.42 |
表6 稻田轮作周年K的输入输出
Table 6 K input-output of red yellow soil system in Chinese milk vetch -double cropping rice rotation pattern
土壤 Soil | 处理 Treatments | 输入 Input (kg·hm-2) | 输出 Output (kg·hm-2) | 归还Return (kg·hm-2) | 归还/输入 Return/Input | 表观 平衡 Balance (kg·hm-2) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
前茬晚稻秸秆 Previous late rice straw | 紫云英 种子 Chinese milk vetch seed | 双季稻秧苗 Rice seedling | 化肥 Chemical fertilizer | 合计 Total | 双季稻籽粒 Rice seed | 双季稻秸秆 Rice straw | 合计 Total | 双季稻植株地下部分 Rice root | 双季稻秸秆 Rice straw | 紫云英 Chinses milk vetch | 合计 Total | ||||
红黄泥 Red yellow soil | FRR | 49.84 | 174.25 | 224.09 | 38.61 | 323.35 | 361.96 | 25.60 | 25.60 | 0.11 | -137.87 | ||||
MvRR | 0.16 | 49.84 | 174.25 | 224.25 | 37.17 | 327.70 | 364.87 | 30.27 | 92.02 | 122.29 | 0.55 | -140.62 | |||
MvRR+St | 216.80 | 0.16 | 49.84 | 174.25 | 441.05 | 39.90 | 39.90 | 38.86 | 374.98 | 175.80 | 589.64 | 1.34 | 401.15 | ||
紫朝泥 Purple alluvial soil | FRR | 49.84 | 174.25 | 224.09 | 38.39 | 323.41 | 361.80 | 36.29 | 36.29 | 0.16 | -137.71 | ||||
MvRR | 0.16 | 49.84 | 174.25 | 224.25 | 35.94 | 328.86 | 364.80 | 34.71 | 127.27 | 161.98 | 0.72 | -140.55 | |||
MvRR+St | 217.94 | 0.16 | 49.84 | 174.25 | 442.19 | 38.77 | 38.77 | 37.15 | 346.75 | 230.65 | 614.55 | 1.39 | 403.42 |
1 | Gao S J, Zhang R G, Cao W D, et al. Long-term rice-rice-green manure rotation changing the microbial communities in typical red paddy soil in South China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2015, 14(12): 2512-2520. |
2 | Ye X, Liu H, Li Z, et al. Effects of green manure continuous application on soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 2014, 37(1/2/3/4): 498-508. |
3 | Gao C J, Cao W D, Bai J S, et al. Long-term application of winter green manures changed the soil microbial biomass properties in red paddy soil. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(4): 202-210. |
高崇涓, 曹卫东, 白金顺, 等. 长期冬种绿肥改变红壤稻田土壤微生物生物量特性. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(4): 202-210. | |
4 | Lü Y H, Guo X Y, Li B Y, et al. Effects of the incorporation of various amounts of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) and reducing chemical fertilizer on soil fertility and rice yield. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017(5): 94-98. |
吕玉虎, 郭晓彦, 李本银, 等. 翻压不同量紫云英配施减量化肥对土壤肥力和水稻产量的影响.中国土壤与肥料, 2017(5): 94-98. | |
5 | Xie Z J, Xu C X, Xu Z L, et al. Effects of applying mineral fertilizer reasonably on the availability of soil nutrient and yields of rice under applying equivalent green manure. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2011(4): 79-82. |
谢志坚, 徐昌旭, 许政良, 等. 翻压等量紫云英条件下不同化肥用量对土壤养分有效性及水稻产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011(4): 79-82. | |
6 | Yang B J, Huang G Q, Chen H J, et al. Optimum combination of winter green manure plowed and nitrogen application levels for high nitrogen uptake and utilization in rice. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2016, 22(5): 1187-1195. |
杨滨娟, 黄国勤, 陈洪俊, 等. 利于水稻氮素吸收的绿肥翻压量和施氮水平研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5): 1187-1195. | |
7 | Lu Y H, Liao Y L, Nie J, et al. Effect of different incorporation of Chinese milk vetch coupled with urea or controlled release urea on yield and nitrogen and potassium nutrient use efficiency in double-cropping rice system. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. |
鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 等. 紫云英与尿素或控释尿素配施对双季稻产量及氮钾利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. | |
8 | Gao J S, Cao W D, Li D C, et al. Effect of long-term double-rice and green manure rotation on rice yield and soil organic matter in paddy field. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(16): 4542-4548. |
高菊生, 曹卫东, 李冬初, 等. 长期双季稻绿肥轮作对水稻产量及稻田土壤有机质的影响. 生态学报, 2011, 31(16): 4542-4548. | |
9 | Liu L S, Xu M G, Zhang L, et al. Evolution characteristics of soil particulate organic carbon in the paddy field with long-term planting green manure. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2015, 21(6): 1439-1446. |
刘立生, 徐明岗, 张璐, 等. 长期种植绿肥稻田土壤颗粒有机碳演变特征. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(6): 1439-1446. | |
10 | Zhang F. Nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium cycling and sustainability of rice yield in a winter crop-double cropping rice rotation system. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2019, 27(5): 705-716. |
张帆. 冬季作物-双季稻轮作种植模式氮、磷、钾养分循环与产量可持续性特征. 中国生态农业学报, 2019, 27(5): 705-716. | |
11 | Huang J, Gao J S, Zhang Y Z, et al. Dynamics of Chinese milk vetch decomposition in paddy field under different fertilization and the supply ability of soil potassium. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2016(1): 83-88. |
黄晶, 高菊生, 张扬珠, 等. 紫云英还田后不同施肥下的腐解及土壤供价特征. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(1): 83-88. | |
12 | Lu R K. Methods of soil and agricultural chemistry analysis. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2000. |
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000. | |
13 | Liao Y L, Lu Y H, Xie J, et al. Effects of long-term application of chemical potassium fertilizer and incorporation of rice straw on potassium supplying capacity of red soil in double cropping paddy field. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(2): 456-467. |
廖育林, 鲁艳红, 谢坚, 等. 长期施用钾肥和稻草对红壤双季稻田土壤供钾能力的影响. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(2): 456-467. | |
14 | Li X S, Shi J L, Wang S J, et al. Effect of long-term straw returning on form and spatial distribution of potassium in agricultural soil. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Sciences), 2016, 44(3): 109-117. |
李秀双, 师江澜, 王淑娟, 等. 长期秸秆还田对农田土壤钾素形态及空间分布的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(3): 109-117. | |
15 | Vesterdal L. Influence of soil type on mass loss and nutrient release from decomposing foliage litter of beech and Norway spruce. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1999, 29(1): 95-105. |
16 | Mclatchey G P, Reddy K R. Regulation of organic matter decomposition and nutrient release in a wetland soil. Journal of Environmental Quality, 1998, 27(5): 1268-1274. |
17 | Yin Z Y, Huang L, Xue B, et al. Effect of continuous straw incorporation on forms of potassium in the paddy soils. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2017, 48(2): 351-358. |
殷志遥, 黄丽, 薛斌, 等. 连续秸秆还田对水稻土中钾素形态的影响. 土壤通报, 2017, 48(2): 351-358. | |
18 | Pan F X, Lu J W, Li X K, et al. Effect of fertilizer application of rice season on yield and nutrition accumulation of green manure. Soils, 2012, 44(5): 762-768. |
潘福霞, 鲁剑巍, 李小坤, 等. 水稻季施肥对后季绿肥物质养分积累的影响. 土壤, 2012, 44(5): 762-768. | |
19 | Li C M, Wang X Y, Sun B. Characteristics of nutrient release and its affecting factors during plant residue decomposition under different climate and soil conditions. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2017, 54(5): 1206-1217. |
李昌明, 王晓玥, 孙波. 不同气候和土壤条件下秸秆腐解过程中养分的释放特征及其影响因素. 土壤学报, 2017, 54(5): 1206-1217. | |
20 | Zhou X, Liao Y L, Lu Y H, et al. Effects of Chinese milk vetch and rice straw synergistic dispatching on grain yield and economic benefit of double cropping rice system under fertilizer reduction. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences), 2017, 43(5): 469-474. |
周兴, 廖育林, 鲁艳红, 等. 减量施肥下紫云英与稻草协同利用对双季稻产量和经济效益的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 43(5): 469-474. | |
21 | Zhou G P, Xie Z J, Cao W D, et al. Co-incorporation of high rice stubble and Chinese milk vetch improving soil fertility and yield of rice. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(23): 157-163. |
周国朋, 谢志坚, 曹卫东, 等. 稻草高茬-紫云英联合还田改善土壤肥力提高作物产量. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(23): 157-163. | |
22 | Song L, Han S, Lu J W, et al. Study on characteristics of decomposing and nutrients releasing of different proportional mixture of rape straw and Chinese milk vetch in rice field. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2015(3): 100-104. |
宋莉, 韩上, 鲁剑巍, 等. 油菜秸秆、紫云英绿肥及其不同比例配施还田的腐解及养分释放规律研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2015(3): 100-104. | |
23 | Wang F, Lin C, Li Q H, et al. A study on organic carbon and nutrient releasing characteristics of different Astragalus sinicus manure use levels in a single cropping region of subtropical China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(4): 319-324. |
王飞, 林诚, 李清华, 等. 亚热带单季稻区紫云英不同翻压量下有机碳和养分释放特征. 草业学报, 2012, 21(4): 319-324. |
[1] | 刘芳, 陈震, 徐雯, 储志英, 管永祥, 吴桂成, 还静, 孙政国. 不同稻茬土壤对紫云英根瘤生长特性的影响研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(6): 153-161. |
[2] | 张梦, 李本银, 刘春增, 吕玉虎, 张成兰, 陈雪青, 曹卫东. 紫云英荚果分层成熟特性及其种子产量研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(2): 64-72. |
[3] | 罗颖洁, 陈桂华, 穆麟, 胡龙兴, 张志飞, 高帅, 魏仲珊. 不同稻秸添加比例对紫花苜蓿和麦麸混合青贮的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(5): 178-184. |
[4] | 郑春风, 刘春增, 李本银, 吕玉虎, 潘兹亮, 曹卫东. 叶面喷硼对紫云英结实特性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(11): 192-199. |
[5] | 谢志坚, 周春火, 贺亚琴, 宋涛, 于洋, 吴佳. 21世纪我国稻区种植紫云英的研究现状及展望[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(8): 185-196. |
[6] | 常单娜, 刘春增, 李本银, 吕玉虎, 潘兹亮, 高嵩涓, 曹卫东. 翻压紫云英对稻田土壤还原物质变化特征及温室气体排放的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(12): 133-144. |
[7] | 李君风, 原现军, 董志浩, Seare Tajebe Desta, 陈雷, 白晰, 白云峰, 邵涛. 西藏地区牦牛瘤胃中兼性厌氧纤维素降解菌的分离鉴定[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(6): 176-184. |
[8] | 王艳秋, 高嵩涓, 曹卫东, 李景环, 聂军, 徐昌旭, 白金顺, 曾闹华, 周国朋. 多年冬种紫云英对两种典型双季稻田土壤肥力及硝化特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(2): 180-189. |
[9] | 万水霞, 唐杉, 蒋光月, 李帆, 郭熙盛, 王允青, 曹卫东. 紫云英与化肥配施对土壤微生物特征和作物产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(6): 109-117. |
[10] | 谢志坚,徐昌旭,刘光荣,曹卫东. 不同剂量苄·丁和二氯喹啉酸对紫云英生长环境及其养分吸收累积的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(5): 201-207. |
[11] | 林新坚,兰忠明,张辉,王飞,何春梅. 不同紫云英基因型根系分泌物中有机酸成分分析[J]. 草业学报, 2014, 23(4): 146-152. |
[12] | 王飞,林诚,李清华,何春梅,林新坚,李昱. 亚热带单季稻区紫云英不同翻压量下有机碳和养分释放特征[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(4): 319-324. |
[13] | 吴一群,张辉,林新坚,兰忠明,张伟光,曹卫东. 不同土壤田间含水量对紫云英生长及生理代谢的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2012, 21(1): 156-161. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||