欢迎访问《草业学报》官方网站,今天是 分享到:

草业学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (1): 15-26.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2018125

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

夏播饲用谷子农艺性状与品质评价

任晓利, 崔纪菡, 刘猛, 赵宇, 艾月鹏, 刘斐, 南春梅, 夏雪岩*, 李顺国*   

  1. 河北省农林科学院谷子研究所,国家谷子改良中心,河北省杂粮研究实验室,河北 石家庄 050035
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-07 出版日期:2019-01-20 发布日期:2019-01-20
  • 通讯作者: *E-mail: xyxia7808@126.com, lishunguo76@163.com
  • 作者简介:任晓利(1984-),女,河北邢台人,硕士。E-mail: renxiaoli2011@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    农业部/财政部“现代农业产业技术体系专项”(CARS-06-13.5-A33),河北省科技计划项目(17236405D),河北省杂粮杂豆产业技术体系(HBCT2018070205),2019-2021年河北省农林科学院农业科技创新工程类财政专项,2015年科技创新激励性补助项目和承德市科学技术研究与发展计划项目(201802B015)资助

Evaluation of agronomic traits and forage quality in summer-sown varieties of forage foxtail millet

REN Xiao-li, CUI Ji-han, LIU Meng, ZHAO Yu, AI Yue-peng, LIU Fei, NAN Chun-mei, XIA Xue-yan*, LI Shun-guo*   

  1. Institute of Millet Crops, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, National Foxtail Millet Improvement Center, Minor Cereal Crops Laboratory of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang 050035, China
  • Received:2018-03-07 Online:2019-01-20 Published:2019-01-20
  • Contact: * E-mail: xyxia7808@126.com, lishunguo76@163.com

摘要: 研究旨在为饲用谷子育种提供优质种质资源,为高品质饲草生产奠定理论依据,对日粮饲料配比有一定的指导意义。通过研究河北省17份夏播饲用谷子品种(系)鲜草产量、干草产量、茎叶比等农艺性状,测定灌浆初期其粗蛋白(CP)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和酸性洗涤纤维(ADF),采用豆科与禾本科等级划分标准、饲料相对值(RFV)和饲料分级指数(GI)3种评价指标对17份饲用谷子进行了品质评价和等级划分。结果表明:1)S2014794、S20151375和S2014742的鲜草产量和干草产量均较高(最高分别达37.26和18.92 t·hm-2),可用作高产饲用谷子品种资源;而虎的尾2、郑10和Z281的籽粒产量较高,并且其灌浆初期与成熟期鲜草和干草产量也属于中上等水平,因此可用作高产粮饲兼用谷子品系资源;茎叶比随着生育期的推进而升高,成熟期>灌浆期>抽穗期,S2014907、S20151375、K2908和K1955茎叶比较低,可作为叶量丰富型品种资源;衡HN201026和虎的尾2可作为高杆型品种资源。2)S2014907、S2014742的CP含量分别为11.81%,11.63%,极显著(P<0.01)高于其他品种;郑10和金绿谷的NDF分别为39.95%和40.06%,极显著(P<0.01)低于其他品种;饲草4号的ADF为14.73%,极显著(P<0.01)低于其他品种。不同的饲草评定方法对饲草等级划分结果不同,但总体趋势一致,采用豆科与禾本科等级划分标准,饲用谷子的品质为中上等水平,是较好的饲草品种。利用GI划分的饲草等级比利用RFV划分的等级普遍降一级,综合3个等级划分,郑10、K3970、金绿谷、饲草4号、K359、K2908、YC264、冀草谷1号饲用价值比较好,可作为高营养价值品种资源。

关键词: 饲用谷子, 产量, 粗蛋白, 饲料相对值, 饲料分级指数

Abstract: This study was designed to provide relevant information for the development of high-quality forage millet germplasm resources, and support informed breeding developments and guide feed formulation. The agronomic trait analysis included 17 summer-sown varieties of forage millet with measurement of fresh and hay yield, plant height, and stem:leaf ratio, among others. To assess nutritive value, crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and acid detergent fiber (ADF) were determined for the same 17 varieties. Three evaluation indexes were three used: the classification criterion of legume and gramineous forages in America, the relative feed value (RFV) and the grading index (GI), were also calculated, and the varieties ranked according to these criteria. It was found that: 1) The varieties S2014794, S20151375 and S2014742 had higher fresh and hay yield compared to others (the highest values of fresh and hay yield, respectively, were 37.26 and 18.92 t·ha-1); hence these varieties could be used as high-yield forage resources. The grain yields of varieties Hudewei 2, Zheng 10 and Z281 were high compared to other varieties, relatively higher, and the fresh and hay yield for these ranked medium to high among the tested cultivars of which were also in the middle and upper level; hence these varieties could be used dual purpose grain and forage production varieties. The varieties S2014907, S20151375, K2908 and K1955 had low stem:leaf ratios; while conversely Heng HN201026 and Hudewei 2 had high stem:leaf ratios, so these traits might indicate special uses for these varieties. Stem:leaf ratio also increased with crop maturity, through heading, grain filling, and seed maturation stages of crop development; Heng HN201026 and Hudewei 2 can be used as high-stalk resources. 2) The CP contents of varieties S2014907 and S2014742 (11.81% and 11.63%, respectively), which were higher (P<0.01) than other varieties. The contents of NDF in Zheng 10 and Jinlügu were 39.95% and 40.06% respectively, which were extremely significantly (P<0.01) lower than other varieties. The content of ADF in Sicao 4 was 14.73%, extremely significantly (P<0.01) lower than other varieties. There were different results by three grading methods of forage, but the general trend were same. By the classification criterion of legume and gramineous forages in America, the feeding value of forage millet is middle and upper level, and it is a better forage variety. The GI forage grading values were generally one unit lower than the corresponding RFV values. Based on the three grading methods, the feeding value of Zheng 10, K3970, Jinlügu, Sicao 4, K359, K2908, YC264 and Jicaogu 1 were superior to others, so these varieties could be used as high-nutritive-value resources.

Key words: forage millet, yield, crude protein, relative feed value, grading index