草业学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 99-110.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020467
王辛有1(), 曹文侠1(), 王小军1, 刘玉祯2, 高瑞1, 王世林1, 安海涛1, 邓秀霞1, 王文虎1
收稿日期:
2020-10-19
修回日期:
2020-12-14
出版日期:
2021-04-20
发布日期:
2021-03-16
通讯作者:
曹文侠
作者简介:
Corresponding author. E-mail: caowx@gsau.edu.cn基金资助:
Xin-you WANG1(), Wen-xia CAO1(), Xiao-jun WANG1, Yu-zhen LIU2, Rui GAO1, Shi-lin WANG1, Hai-tao AN1, Xiu-xia DENG1, Wen-hu WANG1
Received:
2020-10-19
Revised:
2020-12-14
Online:
2021-04-20
Published:
2021-03-16
Contact:
Wen-xia CAO
摘要:
刈割和施肥是豆禾混播草地生产过程中极为重要的田间管理措施,合理的留茬高度和氮磷配施模式可以有效提高混播草地的生产性能。为探究不同留茬高度和施肥模式对多年生豆禾混播草地产量与品质的影响,在河西走廊地区以紫花苜蓿、无芒雀麦和长穗偃麦草1∶1∶1建植的第3年豆禾混播草地为试验对象,利用裂区试验设计,以留茬高度为主区,设置5 cm(A1)、8 cm(A2)、11 cm(A3)3个留茬高度,施肥模式为副区,设置不施肥CK(B1)、单施磷肥:150 kg P2O5·hm-2(B2)、低氮高磷:75 kg N·hm-2+225 kg P2O5·hm-2(B3)、氮磷平衡:150 kg N·hm-2+150 kg P2O5·hm-2(B4)、单施氮肥:150 kg N·hm-2(B5)、高氮低磷:225 kg N·hm-2+75 kg P2O5·hm-2(B6)6个施肥模式,在混播草地中豆科牧草初花期进行刈割,施肥方式为第1茬刈割后追施。结果表明:以A3B3(11 cm留茬高度和75 kg N·hm-2+225 kg P2O5·hm-2的施肥模式)处理组合全年产量最高(19626 kg·hm-2);A2B2(8 cm留茬高度和150 kg P2O5·hm-2的施肥模式)处理组合全年产量最低(14342 kg·hm-2)。提高留茬高度会在一定程度上降低紫花苜蓿整体品质,提高禾本科牧草整体品质。增施氮肥的同时减施磷肥可有效提高牧草粗蛋白含量和相对饲用价值(RFV),施用量过高会使牧草粗蛋白含量和相对饲用价值下降,最合理的氮磷配施模式为150 kg N·hm-2+150 kg P2O5·hm-2。综合产量和品质的结果来看,适当的磷肥施用量可以显著提高牧草营养品质。利用TOPSIS综合评价模型对混播草地产量及各混播组分营养品质进行整体评价后得出:8 cm的留茬高度以及施150 kg N·hm-2+150 kg P2O5·hm-2的氮磷为适宜在河西走廊地区紫花苜蓿+无芒雀麦+长穗偃麦草混播草地利用的留茬高度与施肥模式的组合。
王辛有, 曹文侠, 王小军, 刘玉祯, 高瑞, 王世林, 安海涛, 邓秀霞, 王文虎. 河西地区豆禾混播草地生产性能对刈割高度与施肥的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(4): 99-110.
Xin-you WANG, Wen-xia CAO, Xiao-jun WANG, Yu-zhen LIU, Rui GAO, Shi-lin WANG, Hai-tao AN, Xiu-xia DENG, Wen-hu WANG. Herbage production and forage quality responses to cutting height and fertilization of legume-grass mixtures in the Hexi region[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 99-110.
图1 不同留茬高度和施肥处理下的牧草年产量不同小写字母代表各处理间差异显著(P<0.05),竖杠代表年产量的标准误差。下同。Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among different treatments (P<0.05), and vertical bars represent the standard error of annual output. The same below.
Fig.1 Annual forage yield under different stubble height and fertilization treatments
牧草品种 Forage species | 变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 df | 产量 Yield | 株高 Plant height | 分枝数(分蘖数) Tiller No. (branching No.) | 粗蛋白 Crude protein | 粗脂肪 Crude fat | 相对饲用 价值 RFV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
清水紫花苜蓿 M. sativa | 留茬高度Stubble height (A) | 2 | - | 0.059 | 0.000*** | 0.000*** | 0.885 | 0.023* |
施肥Fertilization (B) | 5 | - | 0.396 | 0.254 | 0.759 | 0.001** | 0.001** | |
A×B | 10 | - | 0.001** | 0.036* | 0.007** | 0.022* | 0.222 | |
误差Error | 36 | - | ||||||
无芒雀麦 B. inermis | 留茬高度Stubble height (A) | 2 | - | 0.006** | 0.000*** | 0.000*** | 0.273 | 0.001** |
施肥Fertilization (B) | 5 | - | 0.227 | 0.819 | 0.000*** | 0.178 | 0.000*** | |
A×B | 10 | - | 0.002** | 0.604 | 0.004** | 0.002** | 0.009** | |
误差Error | 36 | - | ||||||
长穗偃麦草 E. elongate | 留茬高度Stubble height (A) | 2 | - | 0.075 | 0.496 | 0.011* | 0.021* | 0.091 |
施肥Fertilization (B) | 5 | - | 0.029* | 0.263 | 0.083 | 0.527 | 0.009** | |
A×B | 10 | - | 0.043* | 0.016* | 0.010* | 0.000*** | 0.444 | |
误差Error | 36 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
豆禾混播草地 Legume-grass mixture | 留茬高度Stubble height (A) | 2 | 0.048* | - | - | - | - | - |
施肥Fertilization (B) | 5 | 0.181 | - | - | - | - | - | |
A×B | 10 | 0.002** | - | - | - | - | - | |
误差Error | 36 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
表1 主效应和交互作用对混播草地产量及牧草品质的显著性分析
Table 1 Significant analysis of main effect and interaction on yield and quality of mixed pasture
牧草品种 Forage species | 变异来源 Source of variation | 自由度 df | 产量 Yield | 株高 Plant height | 分枝数(分蘖数) Tiller No. (branching No.) | 粗蛋白 Crude protein | 粗脂肪 Crude fat | 相对饲用 价值 RFV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
清水紫花苜蓿 M. sativa | 留茬高度Stubble height (A) | 2 | - | 0.059 | 0.000*** | 0.000*** | 0.885 | 0.023* |
施肥Fertilization (B) | 5 | - | 0.396 | 0.254 | 0.759 | 0.001** | 0.001** | |
A×B | 10 | - | 0.001** | 0.036* | 0.007** | 0.022* | 0.222 | |
误差Error | 36 | - | ||||||
无芒雀麦 B. inermis | 留茬高度Stubble height (A) | 2 | - | 0.006** | 0.000*** | 0.000*** | 0.273 | 0.001** |
施肥Fertilization (B) | 5 | - | 0.227 | 0.819 | 0.000*** | 0.178 | 0.000*** | |
A×B | 10 | - | 0.002** | 0.604 | 0.004** | 0.002** | 0.009** | |
误差Error | 36 | - | ||||||
长穗偃麦草 E. elongate | 留茬高度Stubble height (A) | 2 | - | 0.075 | 0.496 | 0.011* | 0.021* | 0.091 |
施肥Fertilization (B) | 5 | - | 0.029* | 0.263 | 0.083 | 0.527 | 0.009** | |
A×B | 10 | - | 0.043* | 0.016* | 0.010* | 0.000*** | 0.444 | |
误差Error | 36 | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
豆禾混播草地 Legume-grass mixture | 留茬高度Stubble height (A) | 2 | 0.048* | - | - | - | - | - |
施肥Fertilization (B) | 5 | 0.181 | - | - | - | - | - | |
A×B | 10 | 0.002** | - | - | - | - | - | |
误差Error | 36 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
牧草种类Forage species | 施肥Fertilization | A1 | A2 | A3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
清水紫花苜蓿 M. sativa | B1 | 56.9633±1.01229Ba | 56.3000±0.01925Bc | 64.7000±0.78905Aa |
B2 | 61.8267±0.85063Aa | 62.6917±0.37047Aab | 59.2367±0.55812Bbc | |
B3 | 60.4700±1.73205Aa | 65.1678±2.05922Aa | 61.0467±0.12702Aab | |
B4 | 60.8333±0.18860Aa | 64.9333±0.42339Aa | 54.1333±2.42487Bc | |
B5 | 64.2883±4.10592Aa | 58.2667±1.37005Abc | 58.8967±0.25211Abc | |
B6 | 61.0467±2.49030Aa | 61.8000±3.19467Aab | 55.9333±3.15618Abc | |
无芒雀麦 B. inermis | B1 | 45.4900±1.25862Bb | 46.8667±1.34715Bb | 57.8333±0.71207Aa |
B2 | 45.3267±0.43013Cb | 56.7317±1.38660Aa | 52.8278±0.90022Ba | |
B3 | 49.8933±0.29157Aab | 52.8689±1.61562Aab | 53.2667±3.69504Aa | |
B4 | 53.2767±0.14723Aa | 48.7000±0.92452Aab | 53.9000±3.05996Aa | |
B5 | 54.4667±2.34693Aa | 52.2889±4.15841Aab | 55.4917±0.48594Aa | |
B6 | 52.2500±2.45374Aa | 56.4667±3.27165Aa | 51.4667±0.73131Aa | |
长穗偃麦草 E. elongate | B1 | 18.8200±0.86600Acd | 23.3050±1.36351Aa | 24.6333±3.25241Aab |
B2 | 13.5500±2.96758Ad | 19.5500±0.37528Aa | 18.6689±3.28976Abc | |
B3 | 16.4300±0.51962Ccd | 23.5311±0.23190Ba | 27.9667±1.05944Aa | |
B4 | 24.3500±2.41332Aab | 27.2550±7.08890Aa | 15.2183±0.62835Ac | |
B5 | 26.6700±0.57735Aa | 23.5444±5.86560Aa | 27.3567±1.14123Aa | |
B6 | 20.2400±1.17779Abc | 25.9333±2.69430Aa | 19.5333±3.11769Abc |
表2 不同留茬高度和施肥处理下的牧草株高
Table 2 Forage height under different stubble height and fertilization treatments (cm)
牧草种类Forage species | 施肥Fertilization | A1 | A2 | A3 |
---|---|---|---|---|
清水紫花苜蓿 M. sativa | B1 | 56.9633±1.01229Ba | 56.3000±0.01925Bc | 64.7000±0.78905Aa |
B2 | 61.8267±0.85063Aa | 62.6917±0.37047Aab | 59.2367±0.55812Bbc | |
B3 | 60.4700±1.73205Aa | 65.1678±2.05922Aa | 61.0467±0.12702Aab | |
B4 | 60.8333±0.18860Aa | 64.9333±0.42339Aa | 54.1333±2.42487Bc | |
B5 | 64.2883±4.10592Aa | 58.2667±1.37005Abc | 58.8967±0.25211Abc | |
B6 | 61.0467±2.49030Aa | 61.8000±3.19467Aab | 55.9333±3.15618Abc | |
无芒雀麦 B. inermis | B1 | 45.4900±1.25862Bb | 46.8667±1.34715Bb | 57.8333±0.71207Aa |
B2 | 45.3267±0.43013Cb | 56.7317±1.38660Aa | 52.8278±0.90022Ba | |
B3 | 49.8933±0.29157Aab | 52.8689±1.61562Aab | 53.2667±3.69504Aa | |
B4 | 53.2767±0.14723Aa | 48.7000±0.92452Aab | 53.9000±3.05996Aa | |
B5 | 54.4667±2.34693Aa | 52.2889±4.15841Aab | 55.4917±0.48594Aa | |
B6 | 52.2500±2.45374Aa | 56.4667±3.27165Aa | 51.4667±0.73131Aa | |
长穗偃麦草 E. elongate | B1 | 18.8200±0.86600Acd | 23.3050±1.36351Aa | 24.6333±3.25241Aab |
B2 | 13.5500±2.96758Ad | 19.5500±0.37528Aa | 18.6689±3.28976Abc | |
B3 | 16.4300±0.51962Ccd | 23.5311±0.23190Ba | 27.9667±1.05944Aa | |
B4 | 24.3500±2.41332Aab | 27.2550±7.08890Aa | 15.2183±0.62835Ac | |
B5 | 26.6700±0.57735Aa | 23.5444±5.86560Aa | 27.3567±1.14123Aa | |
B6 | 20.2400±1.17779Abc | 25.9333±2.69430Aa | 19.5333±3.11769Abc |
图2 不同留茬高度和施肥处理下紫花苜蓿和无芒雀麦分枝数(分蘖数)的变化
Fig.2 Changes of tiller number/branching number of M. sativa and B. inermis under different stubble height and fertilization treatments
图3 不同留茬高度和施肥处理下各牧草粗蛋白含量的变化不同小写字母表示同一施肥处理不同留茬高度间差异显著,不同大写字母表示相同留茬高度不同施肥处理间差异显著(P<0.05)。下同。Different lowercase letters in the same forage and fertilization treatment indicate significant differences, while different uppercase letters in the same stubble heights indicate significant differences (P<0.05). The same below.
Fig.3 Changes of crude protein content of forage under different stubble height and fertilization treatments
图6 不同留茬高度和施肥处理下3种牧草相对饲用价值的变化
Fig.6 Changes of relative feeding value of three kinds of forage under different stubble height and fertilization treatments
1 | Zhao Y C, Qin J H. The effects on forage to ameliorate and fertilize saline-alkali soil in the Hexi area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2005, 14(6): 63-66. |
赵芸晨, 秦嘉海. 几种牧草对河西走廊盐渍化土壤改土培肥的效应研究. 草业学报, 2005, 14(6): 63-66. | |
2 | Niu S L, Jiang G M. Function of artificial grassland in restoration of degraded natural grassland and its research advance. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2004, 15(9): 1662-1666. |
牛书丽, 蒋高明. 人工草地在退化草地恢复中的作用及其研究现状. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(9): 1662-1666. | |
3 | Xu K K, Wang H, Li X, et al. Identifying areas suitable for cultivation of Medicago sativa L. in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75(4): 1-11. |
4 | Guo H Y. Analysis of mixed seeding pasture of grass and alfalfa on saline-akali soil in Hailiutu. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2019. |
郭宏宇. 基于海流图轻度盐碱地的禾草与苜蓿混播建植研究. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2019. | |
5 | Han D L, He S J, Chen C, et al. The community stability of the mixed grassland with leguminous and gramineous forages. Ecology and Environment, 2008, 17(5): 1974-1979. |
韩德梁, 何胜江, 陈超, 等. 豆禾混播草地群落稳定性的比较. 生态环境, 2008, 17(5): 1974-1979. | |
6 | Zheng W, Zhu J Z, Jianaerguli. A comprehensive evaluation of productive performance of legume-grass mixtures under different mixed sowing patterns. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(6): 242-251. |
郑伟, 朱进忠, 加娜尔古丽. 不同混播方式豆禾混播草地生产性能的综合评价. 草业学报, 2012, 21(6): 242-251. | |
7 | Guan Z X, Naerkezi, Zhu Y Q, et al. Effect of different sowing patterns on production performance and soil nutrients in Avena sativa +Vicia sativa mixtures. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(3): 772-784. |
关正翾, 娜尔克孜, 朱亚琼, 等. 不同混播方式下燕麦+箭筈豌豆混播草地的生产性能及土壤养分特征. 草业科学, 2019, 36(3): 772-784. | |
8 | Xie K Y, Li X L, He F, et al. Response of alfalfa and smooth brome to nitrogen fertilizer in monoculture and mixed grasslands. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(6): 148-156. |
谢开云, 李向林, 何峰, 等. 单播与混播下紫花苜蓿与无芒雀麦生物量对氮肥的响应. 草业学报, 2014, 23(6): 148-156. | |
9 | Ma J. Comprehensive evaluation on productive performances of legume-grass mixed cutting pasture for Horses in Zhaosu. Urumqi: Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2015. |
马军. 昭苏马用豆禾混播刈割草地生产性能的综合评价. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆农业大学, 2015. | |
10 | Liu M, Gong J R, Wang Y H, et al. Effects of legume-grass mixed sowing on forage grass yield and quality in artificial grassland. Arid Zone Research, 2016, 33(1): 179-185. |
刘敏, 龚吉蕊, 王忆慧, 等. 豆禾混播建植人工草地对牧草产量和草质的影响. 干旱区研究, 2016, 33(1): 179-185. | |
11 | Ma X D, Sun J J, Wang P B, et al. Screening of the best mixed ratio of Avena sativa and ×Triticale Wittmack in the high-cold area of Guoluo, Qinghai Province. Pratacultural Science, 2020, 37(4): 753-761. |
马晓东, 孙金金, 汪鹏斌, 等. 青海果洛高寒地区燕麦和小黑麦最佳混播比例筛选. 草业科学, 2020, 37(4): 753-761. | |
12 | Wang P, Zhou D W, Zhang B T. Coexistence and inter-specific competition in grass-legume mixture. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(5): 2560-2567. |
王平, 周道玮, 张宝田. 禾-豆混播草地种间竞争与共存. 生态学报, 2009, 29(5): 2560-2567. | |
13 | Zheng W, Jianaerguli, Tang G R, et al. Determination and comparison of community stability in different legume-grass mixes. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(3): 155-167. |
郑伟, 加娜尔古丽, 唐高溶, 等. 不同混播方式下豆禾混播草地群落稳定性的测度与比较. 草业学报, 2015, 24(3): 155-167. | |
14 | Lu F K, Wang J G. Study on cutting height of mixed sowing of alfalfa with smooth brome. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2014, 36(1): 49-52, 57. |
鲁富宽, 王建光. 紫花苜蓿和无芒雀麦混播草地适宜刈割高度研究. 中国草地学报, 2014, 36(1): 49-52, 57. | |
15 | Huo C J, Han J G, Hong F Z, et al. Effect of the first clipping dates and different stubble heights on the yield and quality of mixture pasture. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2001, 9(4): 257-264. |
霍成君, 韩建国, 洪绂曾, 等. 刈割期和留茬高度对混播草地产草量及品质的影响. 草地学报, 2001, 9(4): 257-264. | |
16 | Langille J E, Warren F S. Influence of clipping treatment on the yield, mineral content and root development of three grass-alfalfa mixtures. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 1962, 184(8): 297-301. |
17 | Zhang Y L, Zheng C F, Hu Z Z. Effect of fertilization on the yield of individual species of perennial grass/legume mixed grassland community. Grassland and Turf, 2004(4): 33-38. |
张永亮, 郑春芳, 胡自治. 施肥对无芒雀麦+杂花苜蓿混播草地组分种产量的影响. 草原与草坪, 2004(4): 33-38. | |
18 | Zhang Y L, Yu T F, Hao F, et al. Effects of fertilization and legume-grass ration on forage yield and NPK utilization efficiency. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(11): 91-101. |
张永亮, 于铁峰, 郝凤, 等. 施肥与混播比例对豆禾混播牧草产量及氮磷钾利用效率的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 91-101. | |
19 | Kou M K, Wang A L, Zhang S C, et al. Study on the effects of different fertilizer treatments on mixed grassland yield in Luqu, Gannan Autonomous Region. Pratacultural Science, 2003, 20(4): 14-15. |
寇明科, 王安碌, 张生璨, 等. 不同施肥处理对提高高寒人工混播草地产草量的试验研究. 草业科学, 2003, 20(4): 14-15. | |
20 | Chen X L, Pan J, Chen L J, et al. Effects of fertilization on hay yield and quality of alfalfa on the Loess Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(12): 3145-3154. |
陈香来, 潘佳, 陈利军, 等. 施肥对黄土高原紫花苜蓿产量及品质的影响. 草业科学, 2019, 36(12): 3145-3154. | |
21 | Li A, Lv Z W, Gu M H, et al. Effect of fertilizing and cutting on biomass of mixed pasture. Pratacultural Science, 2008, 25(7): 83-86. |
李昂, 吕正文, 顾梦鹤, 等. 施肥和刈割对混播草地生物量的影响. 草业科学, 2008, 25(7): 83-86. | |
22 | Wang S L, Cao W X, Wang X J, et al. Distribution of soil moisture and salt of Tamarix ramosissima plantation in desert saline-alkali land of Hexi Corridor Region, China. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(8): 2531-2540. |
王世林, 曹文侠, 王小军, 等. 河西走廊荒漠盐碱地人工柽柳林土壤水盐分布. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(8): 2531-2540. | |
23 | Zhang L Y. Feed analysis and feed quality testing technology. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2003: 45-79. |
张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2003: 45-79 | |
24 | Linn J G, Martin N P. Forage quality tests and interpretation. Minnesota Extension Service, University of Minnesota, 1989. |
25 | Hwang C, Yoon K. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple Attritube Decision Making: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1981. |
26 | Chen B Y. Application of TOPSIS method to the environment quality evaluation of soil. Geoscience, 2008, 22(6): 1003-1009. |
陈伯扬. TOPSIS法在土壤环境质量评价中的应用. 现代地质, 2008, 22(6): 1003-1009. | |
27 | Malhi S S, Arshad M A, Gill K S, et al. Response of alfalfa hay yield to phosphorus fertilization in two soils in central alberta. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 1992, 23(7/8): 717-724. |
28 | Nan L L, Shi S L. Cultivation and processing of alfalfa. Beijing: Golden Shield Press, 2015: 91, 165. |
南丽丽, 师尚礼. 苜蓿栽培与加工利用. 北京: 金盾出版社, 2015: 91, 165. | |
29 | Guo Z G, Liu H X, Wang Y R. Effect of cutting on root growth in lucerne. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2004(2): 215-220. |
郭正刚, 刘慧霞, 王彦荣. 刈割对紫花苜蓿根系生长影响的初步分析. 西北植物学报, 2004(2): 215-220. | |
30 | Zhang J E, Liu W G, Chen J Q, et al. Effects of different cutting intensities on above-and underground growth of Stylosanthes guianensis. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2005, 16(9): 1740-1744. |
章家恩, 刘文高, 陈景青, 等. 不同刈割强度对牧草地上部和地下部生长性状的影响. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(9): 1740-1744. | |
31 | Chang H N, Liu C Q, Li G J, et al. Effects of defoliation on tiller turnover in festulolium and smooth bromegrass. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 1997, 6(1): 54-57. |
常会宁, 刘春起, 李固江, 等. 刈割对羊茅黑麦草和无芒雀麦蘖转化的影响. 草业学报, 1997, 6(1): 54-57. | |
32 | Wang Y L, Li X F, Shi S L, et al. Analysis and evaluation on the production performance components of different alfalfa. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2007, 29(5): 8-15. |
王亚玲, 李晓芳, 师尚礼, 等. 紫花苜蓿生产性能构成因子分析与评价. 中国草地学报, 2007, 29(5): 8-15. | |
33 | Geng H, Xu A K, Luan B Y, et al. Analysis of the yield traits and the study on phenotypic selection of alfalfa. Pratacultural Science, 2013, 30(6): 14-15. |
耿慧, 徐安凯, 栾博宇, 等. 苜蓿产量性状的分析与表型选择研究. 草业科学, 2013, 30(6): 14-15. | |
34 | Liu F F. Effects of different stubble height and cutting period on quality and yield of alfalfa. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2019(18): 178, 180. |
刘凤凤. 不同留茬高度与刈割时期对苜蓿品质及产量影响. 现代农业科技, 2019(18): 178, 180. | |
35 | Xie K Y, Cao K, Wan J C, et al. Change in productivity of swards of different forage legume and grass species monocultures and combinations in the semi-arid region of Xinjing Province. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(4): 29-40. |
谢开云, 曹凯, 万江春, 等. 新疆半干旱区不同豆科/禾本科牧草混播草地生产力的变化研究. 草业学报, 2020, 29(4): 29-40. | |
36 | Lu Q, Cheng Q M, Bao J, et al. Different alfalfa stubble height influence on the yield and quality. Grassland and Prataculture, 2017, 29(2): 39-43. |
卢强, 成启明, 包健, 等. 不同刈割留茬高度对苜蓿产量及品质的影响. 草原与草业, 2017, 29(2): 39-43. | |
37 | Liu Y, Jia Y S, Feng X C, et al. Study on the cutting and drying technology of alfalfa. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(2): 404-408. |
刘燕, 贾玉山, 冯骁骋, 等. 紫花苜蓿刈割和晾晒技术研究. 草地学报, 2014, 22(2): 404-408. | |
38 | Huo H L, Wang Q, Zhang E H, et al. Effects of irrigation and phosphorus supply levels on hay yield and quality of alfalfa. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2014, 21(1): 117-121, 126. |
霍海丽, 王琦, 张恩和, 等. 灌溉和施磷对紫花苜蓿干草产量及营养成分的影响. 水土保持研究, 2014, 21(1): 117-121, 126. | |
39 | Wang D. Effects of nitrogen application on alfalfa production performance and soil nitrogen content. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013. |
王丹. 施氮对紫花苜蓿生产性能及土壤氮含量的影响. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013. |
[1] | 贾雨雷, 廖真, 汪丽芳, 卜建超, 林标声, 林辉, 苏德伟, 鲁国东, 林占熺. 化肥减量配施菌草固氮菌肥对巨菌草生长、营养品质及土壤养分的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(3): 215-223. |
[2] | 沙栢平, 谢应忠, 高雪芹, 蔡伟, 伏兵哲. 地下滴灌水肥耦合对紫花苜蓿草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2): 102-114. |
[3] | 游永亮, 李源, 赵海明, 武瑞鑫, 刘贵波. 海河平原区施氮磷肥对饲用小黑麦生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 137-146. |
[4] | 苗晓茸, 孙艳梅, 于磊, 马春晖, 张前兵. 氮磷互作对不同茬次滴灌苜蓿生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(9): 55-66. |
[5] | 林语梵, 朱鸿福, 王丽慧, 张桂杰. 宁夏黄灌区专用青贮玉米品种生产性能和营养价值研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(8): 40-48. |
[6] | 李菲菲, 张凡凡, 王旭哲, 苗芳, 马春晖. 同/异型发酵乳酸菌对全株玉米青贮营养成分和瘤胃降解特征的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(6): 128-136. |
[7] | 张光雨, 马和平, 邵小明, 王江伟, 沈振西, 付刚. 西藏河谷区9个引进燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质比较研究[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(5): 121-131. |
[8] | 罗颖洁, 陈桂华, 穆麟, 胡龙兴, 张志飞, 高帅, 魏仲珊. 不同稻秸添加比例对紫花苜蓿和麦麸混合青贮的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(5): 178-184. |
[9] | 李菲菲, 张凡凡, 王旭哲, 唐开婷, 马春晖. 刈割茬次和生育期对苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(12): 137-148. |
[10] | 石正海, 刘文辉, 张永超, 秦燕, 魏小星. 氮磷肥配施对西北羊茅开花期叶片光合特性日变化的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(11): 75-85. |
[11] | 成启明, 格根图, 撒多文, 王志军, 范文强, 卜振鲲, 司强, 李俊峰, 卢娟, 贾玉山. 不同品种紫花苜蓿转录组分析及营养品质差异的探讨[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(10): 199-208. |
[12] | 刘晶, 曲广鹏, 田新会, 杜文华. 基于响应面设计的饲草型小黑麦新品系C31栽培条件优化筛选[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(1): 37-49. |
[13] | 郑敏娜, 梁秀芝, 韩志顺, 康佳惠, 陈燕妮. 不同苜蓿品种在雁门关地区的生产性能和营养价值研究[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(5): 97-108. |
[14] | 王玉琴, 鲍根生, 宋梅玲, 尹亚丽, 刘生财, 杨有武, 杨铭, 王宏生. 两种措施下施氮肥对狼毒型退化草地群落及营养品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(12): 177-186. |
[15] | 苗芳, 张凡凡, 唐开婷, 贾舒安, 王旭哲, 马春晖. 同/异质型乳酸菌添加对全株玉米青贮发酵特性、营养品质及有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2017, 26(9): 167-175. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||