不同苜蓿品种在雁门关地区的生产性能和营养价值研究

doi:10.11686/cyxb2017408

草业学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (5): 97-108.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2017408

不同苜蓿品种在雁门关地区的生产性能和营养价值研究

郑敏娜, 梁秀芝^*, 韩志顺, 康佳惠, 陈燕妮

山西省农业科学院高寒区作物研究所,山西大同 037008

收稿日期:2017-09-29 修回日期:2017-11-28 出版日期:2018-05-20 发布日期:2018-05-20
通讯作者: * E-mail:liangxiuzhi@126.com
作者简介:郑敏娜(1983-),女,甘肃通渭人,助理研究员,硕士。E-mail: zhengminna@126.com
基金资助:
山西省重点研发计划项目(201703D221012-5),大同市科技攻关项目(2017080),山西省科技攻关项目(20140311013-1),山西省农业科学院育种工程项目(17yzgc080)和山西省农业科学院特色农业技术攻关项目(YGG17005)资助

Productivity and nutritional value of 28 alfalfa varieties in the Yanmenguan area of Shanxi province

ZHENG Min-na, LIANG Xiu-zhi^*, HAN Zhi-shun, KANG Jia-hui, CHEN Yan-ni

High Latitude Crops Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Datong 037008, China

Received:2017-09-29 Revised:2017-11-28 Online:2018-05-20 Published:2018-05-20
Contact: * E-mail:liangxiuzhi@126.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在雁门关地区,以28个紫花苜蓿不同品种作为研究对象,连续两年观测其再生速度、叶茎比、株高和干草产量,并利用近红外光谱(NIRS)技术对8个营养性状指标进行测定分析,并采用灰色关联度分析方法进行综合评价。结果表明:1)“阿迪娜”生长速度在2015和2016年均表现为最高,分别为2.78和3.19 cm·d^-1;“WL363HQ”叶茎比在2015和2016年均表现为最高,分别为0.84和0.97;2) “WL298HQ” 在2015年的株高表现为最高(54.90 cm),“巨能7号”在2016年的株高表现为最高(84.27 cm);“鲁苜2号” 在2015年的干草产量表现最高,为6961.81 kg·hm^-2,“巨能7号” 在2016年的干草产量表现最高,为8587.63 kg·hm^-2;3)各品种的营养成分分析结果显示,“维多利亚”的粗蛋白含量最高,占干物质的26.80%;“维多利亚”的粗灰分和粗脂肪含量均表现为最高(分别为10.20%和 2.34%);“肇东”的干物质含量最高,达到94.55%;“康赛”的中性洗涤纤维含量和酸性洗涤纤维含量均最低,分别为27.18%和33.31%;“雷达克之星”的瘤胃非降解蛋白含量最高(22.27%);“康赛”的干物质体外消化率最高(79.93%)。通过灰色关联度综合分析显示,“维多利亚”、“康赛”、“WL298HQ”、“SK3010”、“巨能7号”5个品种的综合表现最优异,在雁门关地区具有较高的推广利用价值。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 生产性能, 近红外光谱, 营养品质, 综合评价

Abstract: Twenty-eight alfalfa (Medicago sativa) varieties were studied in Yanmenguan, Shanxi province. The growth rate, leaf∶stem ratio, plant height and hay yield were measured by conventional methods in two consecutive years. In addition, herbage nutritional qualities were measured by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Key results were: 1) The growth rate of M. sativa cv. Adrendin were the highest at 2.78 and 3.19 cm·d^-1 in 2015 and 2016 respectively. The leaf∶stem ratio of M. sativa cv. WL363HQ was the highest at 0.84 and 0.97 in 2015 and 2016 respectively. 2) The plant height of M. sativa cv. WL298HQ was the highest at 54.90 cm in 2015; The plant height of M. sativa cv. Magnum VII was the highest at 84.27 cm in 2016. The hay yield of M. sativa cv. Lumu No.2 was the highest at 6961.81 kg·hm^-2 in 2015, and the hay yield of M. sativa cv. Magnum VII was the highest at 8587.63 kg·hm^-2 in 2016. 3) The crude protein, crude ash and ether extract of M. sativa cv.Victorian were the highest at 26.80%, 10.20% and 2.34%; The dry matter percent of Zhaodong was the highest at 94.55%; The acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber of M. sativa cv. Concept were the lowest at 27.18% and 33.31%, respectively. The rumen undegradable protein of M. sativa cv. Ladak was the highest at 22.27%. The dry matter digestibility of M. sativa cv. Concept was the highest at 79.93%. In this evaluation, M. sativa cv. Victorian, M. sativa cv. Concept, M. sativa cv. WL298HQ, M. sativa cv. SK3010 and M. sativa cv. Magnum VII, outperformed other varieties, which indicates that these five varieties are suitable for use in the Yanmenguan region of Shanxi province.

Key words: alfalfa, production performance, near infrared reflectance spectroscopy, nutritional value, comprehensive evaluation

郑敏娜, 梁秀芝, 韩志顺, 康佳惠, 陈燕妮. 不同苜蓿品种在雁门关地区的生产性能和营养价值研究[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(5): 97-108.

ZHENG Min-na, LIANG Xiu-zhi, HAN Zhi-shun, KANG Jia-hui, CHEN Yan-ni. Productivity and nutritional value of 28 alfalfa varieties in the Yanmenguan area of Shanxi province[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(5): 97-108.

参考文献

[1] Li X Y, Wang J T, Han T H, et al. China’s fodder production situation and countermeasure analysis. Pratacultural Science, 2015, 32(12): 2155-2166.
李新一, 王加亭, 韩天虎, 等. 我国饲草料生产形势及对策分析. 草业科学, 2015, 32(12): 2155-2166.
[2] Li X L, Shen Y Y, Wan L Q.Potential analysis and policy recommendations for restructuring the crop farming and developing forage industry in China. Engineering Sciences, 2016, 18(1): 94-105.
李向林, 沈禹颖, 万里强. 种植业结构调整和草牧业发展潜力分析及政策建议. 中国工程科学, 2016, 18(1): 94-105.
[3] Yi L Z, Li C Z, Liu H Q, et al. Adaptation of different alfalfa varieties in Qingdao, Shandong province. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(2): 147-155.
衣兰智, 李长忠, 刘洪庆, 等. 不同苜蓿品种在青岛地区的适应性. 草业学报, 2011, 20(2): 147-155.
[4] Zheng M N, Li Y F, Liang X Z, et al. Relation grade analysis of grey theory and comprehensive evaluation of introduced alfalfa in the north of Shanxi province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 22(3): 631-637.
郑敏娜, 李荫藩, 梁秀芝, 等. 晋北地区引种苜蓿品种的灰色关联度分析与综合评价. 草地学报, 2017, 22(3): 631-637.
[5] Wang S F, Liu Y X, Gao L L, et al. Fourier transform infrared spectral analysis of maize (Zea mays) plants under zinc deficiency stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(4): 1005-1011.
王盛锋, 刘云霞, 高丽丽, 等. 缺锌玉米植株的傅立叶变换红外光谱研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4): 1005-1011.
[6] Xu R X, Li D N, Yang D H, et al. Alfalfa quality evaluation in the field by near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2013, 33(11): 3010-3013.
许瑞轩, 李东宁, 杨东海, 等. 近红外光谱法田间快速估测新鲜紫花苜蓿品质. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2013, 33(11): 3010-3013.
[7] Gao Y L, Sun Y.Quality evaluation of alfalfa hay by the spectroscopic analysis of near infrared reflectance. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(5): 1080-1084.
高燕丽, 孙彦. 利用近红外光谱分析预测紫花苜蓿干草品质. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5): 1080-1084.
[8] Li J, Wang J F, Wu J P, et al. Study on the determination of nutritional ingredient in native grass with visible/near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Journal of Livestock Ecology, 2014, 35(4): 54-58.
李洁, 王建福, 吴建平, 等. 可见/近红外漫反射光谱分析法测定牧草营养成分研究. 家畜生态学报, 2014, 35(4): 54-58.
[9] Shang C, Zhang Y X, Li Y, et al. Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy analytic models established for the crude protein and crude fiber of alfalfa property. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2009, 29(12): 3250-3253.
尚晨, 张月学, 李炎, 等. 紫花苜蓿粗蛋白和粗纤维近红外分析模型的建立. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2009, 29(12): 3250-3253.
[10] Liu W, Zhang Y J, Xu R X.Comparative study on quality of alfalfa with near-infrared-reflectance spectroscopy and conventional chemical assay. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(3): 269-272.
刘温, 张英俊, 许瑞轩. 近红外光谱技术与常规方法检测紫花苜蓿品质的对比研究. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(3): 269-272.
[11] Xue Z L, Liu N, Zhang Y J.Nutritional quality and digestibility evaluation of alfalfa hay bale by near infrared reflectance. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(1): 165-171.
薛祝林, 刘楠, 张英俊. 近红外光谱法预测紫花苜蓿草捆的营养品质和消化率. 草地学报, 2017, 25(1): 165-171.
[12] Miller D A, Shrivastava J P, Jackobs J A.Alfalfa yield components in solid seedings. Crop Science, 1969, 9: 440-443.
[13] Griggs T C.Alfalfa variety selection guidelines. Forage and Pasture, 2004, 2: 1-10.
[14] Sun Q Z, Wang Z L, Xu L J.Alfalfa in arid regions. Beijing: Science Press, 2014: 116-180.
孙启忠, 王宗礼, 徐丽君. 旱区苜蓿. 北京:科学出版社, 2014: 116-180.
[15] Sun W B, Ma H L, Hou X Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and nutritional value of 20 alfalfa cultivars in two ecological areas of Gansu province. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(3): 161-174.
孙万斌, 马晖玲, 侯向阳, 等. 20个紫花苜蓿品种在甘肃两个地区的生产性能及营养价值综合评价. 草业学报, 2017, 26(3): 161-174.
[16] Kang J M, Yang Q C, Guo W S, et al. Evaluation of ten introduced alfalfa cultivars in Beijing area of China. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2010, 32(6): 5-10.
康俊梅, 杨青川, 郭文山, 等. 北京地区10个紫花苜蓿引进品种的生产性能研究. 中国草地学报, 2010, 32(6): 5-10.
[17] Hu H F, Jie X L, Guo X, et al. Effects of Se application as basal fertilizer on the nutrient contents and distribution rates of alfalfa at growth stages. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(4): 871-877.
胡华锋, 介晓磊, 郭孝, 等. 基施硒肥对不同生育期紫花苜蓿营养含量及分配的影响. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4): 871-877.
[18] Li Y J, Gu H R, Shen Y X, et al. Differences in inviter dry matter digestibility at heading stage in Italian ryegrass lines. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences of Agriculture Sinica, 2005, 21(1): 53-58.
李元姬, 顾洪如, 沈益新, 等. 多花黑麦草抽穗期干物质体外消化率在品系间的差异. 江苏农业学报, 2005, 21(1): 53-58.

不同苜蓿品种在雁门关地区的生产性能和营养价值研究

Productivity and nutritional value of 28 alfalfa varieties in the Yanmenguan area of Shanxi province

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	吴勇, 刘晓静, 蔺芳, 童长春. 河西荒漠灌区紫花苜蓿施肥效应及其基于数据包络分析法的经济效益研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 94-105.
[2]	邢易梅, 蕫理, 战力峰, 才华, 杨圣秋, 孙娜. 混合接种摩西球囊霉和根瘤菌对紫花苜蓿耐碱能力的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 136-145.
[3]	覃凤飞, 李志华, 刘信宝, 渠晖, 平措卓玛, 洛松群措, 苏梦涵. 外源2,4表油菜素内酯对越夏期高温与弱光胁迫下紫花苜蓿生长和光合性能的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 146-160.
[4]	张蓉, 陈光吉, 尚以顺, 李世歌, 李小冬, 熊先勤, 牟琼, 王小利, 冉伟男, 班宋智. 鲜饲金荞麦对热应激蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质和血清指标的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 179-189.
[5]	童长春, 刘晓静, 蔺芳, 于铁峰. 基于平衡施肥的紫花苜蓿光合特性及光合因子的产量效应研究[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 70-80.
[6]	曾令霜, 李培英, 孙晓梵, 孙宗玖. 新疆不同生境狗牙根种质抗旱性综合评价[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(8): 155-169.
[7]	孙大明, 殷雨洋, 吴建良, 刘理想, 毛胜勇, 刘军花. 早期补饲粉状精料和颗粒料对羔羊生长性能及胃肠道发育的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 184-192.
[8]	何国兴, 宋建超, 温雅洁, 刘彩婷, 祁娟. 不同根瘤菌肥对紫花苜蓿生产力及土壤肥力的综合影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(5): 109-120.
[9]	于浩然, 格根图, 王志军, 贾玉山, 连植, 贾鹏飞. 甲酸添加剂及青贮时间对紫花苜蓿青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 89-95.
[10]	高丽敏, 苏晶, 田倩, 沈益新. 施氮对不同水分条件下紫花苜蓿氮素吸收及根系固氮酶活性的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 130-136.
[11]	游永亮, 李源, 赵海明, 武瑞鑫, 刘贵波. 海河平原区施氮磷肥对饲用小黑麦生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 137-146.
[12]	钱志豪, 韩丙芳, 刘自婷, 蔡伟, 伏兵哲, 马红彬. 渗灌对宁夏引黄灌区苜蓿生长性状及水分利用率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(3): 147-156.
[13]	张雪婷, 王新永, 杨文雄, 柳娜, 杨长刚. 河西绿洲灌区节水抗旱型玉米品种的评价方法探讨[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(2): 134-148.
[14]	赵娟娟, 张伟涛, 郭伟婷, 孙新胜, 王超, 赵寿培, 车大璐, 高玉红. 饮水温度对冬季育肥羊生产性能、血液理化指标及瘤胃显微结构的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 57-66.
[15]	张永亮, 于铁峰, 郝凤, 高凯. 施肥与混播比例对豆禾混播牧草产量及氮磷钾利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2020, 29(11): 91-101.