Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 141-152.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2022486
Jiao-yun LU1(), Hong TIAN1, He-shan ZHANG1, Jun-bo XIONG1, Yang LIU1(), Zhen-nan WANG2()
Received:
2022-12-13
Revised:
2023-02-02
Online:
2023-10-20
Published:
2023-07-26
Contact:
Yang LIU,Zhen-nan WANG
Jiao-yun LU, Hong TIAN, He-shan ZHANG, Jun-bo XIONG, Yang LIU, Zhen-nan WANG. Effects of H2O2 immersion on seed germination and seedling growth of alfalfa under salt stress[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(10): 141-152.
指标 Index | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽势 Germination potential | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vigor index | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | |
H2O2 | <0.001 | 25.421 | <0.001 | 11.389 | <0.001 | 23.291 | <0.001 | 17.765 |
NaCl | <0.001 | 197.384 | <0.001 | 577.641 | <0.001 | 1265.855 | <0.001 | 912.672 |
H2O2×NaCl | 0.204 | 1.469 | <0.001 | 5.670 | <0.001 | 13.137 | <0.001 | 102.107 |
Table 1 Effect of H2O2, NaCl and their interaction on seed germination of alfalfa
指标 Index | 发芽率 Germination rate | 发芽势 Germination potential | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vigor index | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | |
H2O2 | <0.001 | 25.421 | <0.001 | 11.389 | <0.001 | 23.291 | <0.001 | 17.765 |
NaCl | <0.001 | 197.384 | <0.001 | 577.641 | <0.001 | 1265.855 | <0.001 | 912.672 |
H2O2×NaCl | 0.204 | 1.469 | <0.001 | 5.670 | <0.001 | 13.137 | <0.001 | 102.107 |
指标Index | 部位Part | 项目Item | H2O2 | NaCl | H2O2×NaCl |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
鲜重 Fresh weight | 苗Shoot | P | 0.005 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
F | 6.626 | 41.865 | 23.540 | ||
根Root | P | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | |
F | 38.621 | 8.004 | 66.134 | ||
全株Whole plant | P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
F | 11.582 | 36.424 | 24.135 | ||
干重 Dry weight | 苗Shoot | P | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
F | 10.404 | 19.398 | 7.119 | ||
根Root | P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.007 | |
F | 15.772 | 18.389 | 3.991 | ||
全株Whole plant | P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.005 | |
F | 15.081 | 17.706 | 4.187 | ||
绝对含水量 Absolute moisture | 苗Shoot | P | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
F | 7.904 | 15.955 | 10.616 | ||
根Root | P | <0.001 | 0.225 | <0.001 | |
F | 24.958 | 1.562 | 44.838 | ||
全株Whole plant | P | 0.009 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
F | 5.851 | 20.297 | 10.351 | ||
根冠比 Root-shoot ratio | P | 0.003 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
F | 7.680 | 18.331 | 7.145 |
Table 2 Effect of H2O2, NaCl and their interaction on seedling biomass, moisture and root-shoot ratio of alfalfa
指标Index | 部位Part | 项目Item | H2O2 | NaCl | H2O2×NaCl |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
鲜重 Fresh weight | 苗Shoot | P | 0.005 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
F | 6.626 | 41.865 | 23.540 | ||
根Root | P | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | |
F | 38.621 | 8.004 | 66.134 | ||
全株Whole plant | P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
F | 11.582 | 36.424 | 24.135 | ||
干重 Dry weight | 苗Shoot | P | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
F | 10.404 | 19.398 | 7.119 | ||
根Root | P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.007 | |
F | 15.772 | 18.389 | 3.991 | ||
全株Whole plant | P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.005 | |
F | 15.081 | 17.706 | 4.187 | ||
绝对含水量 Absolute moisture | 苗Shoot | P | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
F | 7.904 | 15.955 | 10.616 | ||
根Root | P | <0.001 | 0.225 | <0.001 | |
F | 24.958 | 1.562 | 44.838 | ||
全株Whole plant | P | 0.009 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
F | 5.851 | 20.297 | 10.351 | ||
根冠比 Root-shoot ratio | P | 0.003 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
F | 7.680 | 18.331 | 7.145 |
H2O2浓度 H2O2 concentration (μmol·L-1) | NaCl浓度NaCl concentration (%) | 鲜重 Fresh weight (g·×103 plant-1) | 干重 Dry weight (g·×103 plant-1) | 绝对含水量 Absolute moisture (%) | 根冠比Root- shoot ratio | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗 Shoot | 根 Root | 全株 Whole plant | 苗 Shoot | 根 Root | 全株 Whole plant | 苗 Shoot | 根 Root | 全株 Whole plant | |||
0 | 0 | 8.13±0.67bB | 1.82±0.07aA | 9.95±0.68bB | 1.49±0.10bA | 0.36±0.08abB | 1.85±0.16abB | 81.64±1.11cA | 80.07±3.96aA | 81.34±1.56bA | 0.24±0.05abB |
0.6 | 14.06±1.45aB | 0.83±0.14bA | 14.89±1.48aB | 1.75±0.14aA | 0.31±0.04bcB | 2.06±0.16aA | 87.51±0.99bB | 62.53±6.14bA | 86.15±0.96aB | 0.18±0.02bB | |
1.2 | 15.94±1.07aA | 0.65±0.10cB | 16.59±1.14aA | 1.37±0.06bC | 0.42±0.06aA | 1.79±0.03abC | 91.39±0.89aA | 34.32±3.23cC | 89.17±0.85aA | 0.31±0.05aA | |
1.8 | 8.86±1.06bB | 0.29±0.04dC | 9.15±1.03bC | 1.45±0.14bA | 0.25±0.04cB | 1.70±0.16bAB | 83.47±2.70cB | 14.06±3.87dC | 81.26±3.17bB | 0.17±0.02bB | |
5 | 0 | 10.70±1.04bA | 1.47±0.32bA | 12.17±1.29cA | 1.65±0.03aA | 0.59±0.04aA | 2.24±0.07aA | 84.49±1.33cA | 58.38±8.92bB | 81.44±1.76cA | 0.36±0.02aAB |
0.6 | 10.78±0.22bC | 1.20±0.26bcA | 11.98±0.21cB | 1.65±0.01aA | 0.46±0.01bA | 2.11±0.02aA | 84.69±0.26cC | 60.72±9.41bA | 82.41±0.21cC | 0.28±0.00bA | |
1.2 | 15.47±1.17aA | 0.77±0.06cB | 16.24±1.14bA | 1.76±0.12aA | 0.38±0.06bA | 2.14±0.07aA | 88.57±1.47bB | 50.13±11.70bB | 86.79±1.11bB | 0.22±0.05bA | |
1.8 | 15.58±0.95aA | 2.79±0.25aA | 18.37±0.72aA | 1.44±0.05bA | 0.38±0.06bA | 1.82±0.12bA | 90.74±0.65aA | 86.20±2.61aA | 90.07±0.66aA | 0.27±0.04bA | |
100 | 0 | 8.35±0.91dB | 0.82±0.16bB | 9.17±1.02cB | 1.15±0.24bB | 0.49±0.06aAB | 1.64±0.24bB | 85.87±4.28cA | 39.84±9.23cC | 81.78±4.52bA | 0.43±0.10aA |
0.6 | 18.72±2.11aA | 1.03±0.22bA | 19.75±2.16aA | 1.79±0.04aA | 0.35±0.04bcB | 2.14±0.08aA | 90.37±0.97abA | 65.05±8.50bA | 89.10±0.99aA | 0.20±0.02bB | |
1.2 | 11.85±1.32cB | 2.45±0.17aA | 14.30±1.20bA | 1.55±0.06aB | 0.42±0.06abA | 1.97±0.12aB | 86.87±1.10bcB | 82.69±3.70aA | 86.22±0.71aB | 0.27±0.03bA | |
1.8 | 14.63±1.28bA | 1.22±0.26bB | 15.86±1.53bB | 1.18±0.14bB | 0.28±0.03cB | 1.46±0.17bB | 91.97±0.34aA | 76.61±3.81abB | 90.82±0.39aA | 0.24±0.01bA |
Table 3 Effect of H2O2 immersion on seedling biomass, moisture and root-shoot ratio of alfalfa under salt stress
H2O2浓度 H2O2 concentration (μmol·L-1) | NaCl浓度NaCl concentration (%) | 鲜重 Fresh weight (g·×103 plant-1) | 干重 Dry weight (g·×103 plant-1) | 绝对含水量 Absolute moisture (%) | 根冠比Root- shoot ratio | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
苗 Shoot | 根 Root | 全株 Whole plant | 苗 Shoot | 根 Root | 全株 Whole plant | 苗 Shoot | 根 Root | 全株 Whole plant | |||
0 | 0 | 8.13±0.67bB | 1.82±0.07aA | 9.95±0.68bB | 1.49±0.10bA | 0.36±0.08abB | 1.85±0.16abB | 81.64±1.11cA | 80.07±3.96aA | 81.34±1.56bA | 0.24±0.05abB |
0.6 | 14.06±1.45aB | 0.83±0.14bA | 14.89±1.48aB | 1.75±0.14aA | 0.31±0.04bcB | 2.06±0.16aA | 87.51±0.99bB | 62.53±6.14bA | 86.15±0.96aB | 0.18±0.02bB | |
1.2 | 15.94±1.07aA | 0.65±0.10cB | 16.59±1.14aA | 1.37±0.06bC | 0.42±0.06aA | 1.79±0.03abC | 91.39±0.89aA | 34.32±3.23cC | 89.17±0.85aA | 0.31±0.05aA | |
1.8 | 8.86±1.06bB | 0.29±0.04dC | 9.15±1.03bC | 1.45±0.14bA | 0.25±0.04cB | 1.70±0.16bAB | 83.47±2.70cB | 14.06±3.87dC | 81.26±3.17bB | 0.17±0.02bB | |
5 | 0 | 10.70±1.04bA | 1.47±0.32bA | 12.17±1.29cA | 1.65±0.03aA | 0.59±0.04aA | 2.24±0.07aA | 84.49±1.33cA | 58.38±8.92bB | 81.44±1.76cA | 0.36±0.02aAB |
0.6 | 10.78±0.22bC | 1.20±0.26bcA | 11.98±0.21cB | 1.65±0.01aA | 0.46±0.01bA | 2.11±0.02aA | 84.69±0.26cC | 60.72±9.41bA | 82.41±0.21cC | 0.28±0.00bA | |
1.2 | 15.47±1.17aA | 0.77±0.06cB | 16.24±1.14bA | 1.76±0.12aA | 0.38±0.06bA | 2.14±0.07aA | 88.57±1.47bB | 50.13±11.70bB | 86.79±1.11bB | 0.22±0.05bA | |
1.8 | 15.58±0.95aA | 2.79±0.25aA | 18.37±0.72aA | 1.44±0.05bA | 0.38±0.06bA | 1.82±0.12bA | 90.74±0.65aA | 86.20±2.61aA | 90.07±0.66aA | 0.27±0.04bA | |
100 | 0 | 8.35±0.91dB | 0.82±0.16bB | 9.17±1.02cB | 1.15±0.24bB | 0.49±0.06aAB | 1.64±0.24bB | 85.87±4.28cA | 39.84±9.23cC | 81.78±4.52bA | 0.43±0.10aA |
0.6 | 18.72±2.11aA | 1.03±0.22bA | 19.75±2.16aA | 1.79±0.04aA | 0.35±0.04bcB | 2.14±0.08aA | 90.37±0.97abA | 65.05±8.50bA | 89.10±0.99aA | 0.20±0.02bB | |
1.2 | 11.85±1.32cB | 2.45±0.17aA | 14.30±1.20bA | 1.55±0.06aB | 0.42±0.06abA | 1.97±0.12aB | 86.87±1.10bcB | 82.69±3.70aA | 86.22±0.71aB | 0.27±0.03bA | |
1.8 | 14.63±1.28bA | 1.22±0.26bB | 15.86±1.53bB | 1.18±0.14bB | 0.28±0.03cB | 1.46±0.17bB | 91.97±0.34aA | 76.61±3.81abB | 90.82±0.39aA | 0.24±0.01bA |
处理 Treatment | SOD | CAT | POD | 丙二醛 Malondialdehyde | 脯氨酸 Proline | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | |
H2O2 | <0.001 | 111.417 | <0.001 | 106.515 | <0.001 | 175.905 | <0.001 | 15.791 | <0.001 | 104.913 | <0.001 | 13.149 | <0.001 | 32.308 |
NaCl | <0.001 | 71.272 | <0.001 | 64.030 | <0.001 | 32.149 | <0.001 | 25.842 | 0.093 | 2.399 | <0.001 | 15.516 | <0.001 | 26.838 |
H2O2×NaCl | <0.001 | 59.762 | <0.001 | 19.758 | 0.013 | 3.452 | 0.003 | 4.730 | 0.002 | 4.973 | 0.001 | 5.933 | <0.001 | 6.251 |
Table 4 Effect of H2O2, NaCl and their interaction on seedling antioxidant enzyme activity and osmotic regulator of alfalfa
处理 Treatment | SOD | CAT | POD | 丙二醛 Malondialdehyde | 脯氨酸 Proline | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 可溶性蛋白 Soluble protein | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | |
H2O2 | <0.001 | 111.417 | <0.001 | 106.515 | <0.001 | 175.905 | <0.001 | 15.791 | <0.001 | 104.913 | <0.001 | 13.149 | <0.001 | 32.308 |
NaCl | <0.001 | 71.272 | <0.001 | 64.030 | <0.001 | 32.149 | <0.001 | 25.842 | 0.093 | 2.399 | <0.001 | 15.516 | <0.001 | 26.838 |
H2O2×NaCl | <0.001 | 59.762 | <0.001 | 19.758 | 0.013 | 3.452 | 0.003 | 4.730 | 0.002 | 4.973 | 0.001 | 5.933 | <0.001 | 6.251 |
1 | Wang Q Z, Liu Q, Gao Y N, et al. Review on the mechanisms of the response to salinity-alkalinity stress in plants. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(16): 5565-5577. |
王佺珍, 刘倩, 高娅妮, 等. 植物对盐碱胁迫的响应机制研究进展. 生态学报, 2017, 37(16): 5565-5577. | |
2 | Lu F K, Song X F, Hu Y, et al. Effects of drought stress and salt stress on Medicago sativa seed germination. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2022, 652(16): 102-107. |
鲁富宽, 宋雪峰, 胡云, 等. 干旱胁迫和盐胁迫对紫花苜蓿种子萌发的影响. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2022, 652(16): 102-107. | |
3 | Cui X W, Guo Z P, Mao Y, et al. Evaluation on salt tolerance of 33 alfalfa cultivars during germination. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domasrici, 2022, 43(2): 55-65. |
崔雪雯, 郭志鹏, 毛月, 等. 33个紫花苜蓿品种萌发期的耐盐性评价. 家畜生态学报, 2022, 43(2): 55-65. | |
4 | Wang N, Li Y X, Zhang Y M, et al. Research progress of soybean salt tolerance in China based on bibliometrics. Soybean Science, 2013, 32(5): 708-710. |
王宁, 李云霞, 张以民, 等. 基于文献计量分析我国大豆耐盐研究现状. 大豆科学, 2013, 32(5): 708-710. | |
5 | Fu M, He L W, Li X H, et al. Effect of H2O2 treatment on alfalfa seed germination under salt stress. Shaanxi Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 67(11): 67-70. |
付咪, 何林卫, 李鲜花, 等. H2O2处理对盐胁迫下苜蓿种子萌发的影响. 陕西农业科学, 2021, 67(11): 67-70. | |
6 | Li Z P, Zhang W H, Cui Y C. Effects of NaCl and Na2CO3 stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Quercus variabilis. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(3): 742-751. |
李志萍, 张文辉, 崔豫川. NaCl和Na2CO3胁迫对栓皮栎种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 生态学报, 2015, 35(3): 742-751. | |
7 | Jiao D Z, Zhao Z L. The research progress of saline-alkali stress effect plant morphology, physiology and biochemistry, and plant response. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 47(20): 1-4. |
焦德志, 沼泽龙. 盐碱胁迫对植物形态和生理生化影响及植物响应的研究进展. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(20): 1-4. | |
8 | Uchida A, Jagendorf A T, Hibino T, et al. Effects of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide on both salt and heat stress tolerance in rice. Plant Science, 2002, 163(3): 515-523. |
9 | Zhu Z B, Lai C Y, Zou K X, et al. Research progress of brassinolide and its physiological effects during seed germination. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2015, 35(5): 13-18. |
朱早兵, 赖彩余, 邹凯茜, 等. 油菜素内酯及其在种子萌发过程中的生理效应研究进展. 热带农业科学, 2015, 35(5): 13-18. | |
10 | Liao W B, Huang G B, Yu J H, et al. Nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide are involved in indole-3-butyricacid-induced adventitious roots development in marigold. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, 2011, 86(2): 159-165. |
11 | Bai X J, Liu L J, Zhang C H, et al. Effect of H2O2 pretreatment on Cd tolerance of different rice cultivars. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2010, 24(4): 391-397. |
白晓娟, 刘丽娟, 张春华, 等. H2O2预处理对不同水稻品种Cd耐性的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(4): 391-397. | |
12 | Liu J X, Ou X B, Wang J C. Effects of exogenous hydrogen peroxide on growth and resistance physiology of naked oat seedling under saline-alkali mixed stress. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2019, 39(2): 181-191. |
刘建新, 欧晓彬, 王金成. 外源H2O2对盐碱混合胁迫下裸燕麦幼苗生长和抗性生理的影响. 植物研究, 2019, 39(2): 181-191. | |
13 | Ren Y F, He J Y, Yang J, et al. Effects of exogenous hydrogen peroxide on seed germination and physiological characteristics of pakchoi seedlings (Brassica chinensis L.) under salt stress. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(20): 7745-7756. |
任艳芳, 何俊瑜, 杨军, 等. 外源H2O2对盐胁迫下小白菜种子萌发和幼苗生理特性的影响. 生态学报, 2019, 39(20): 7745-7756. | |
14 | Sathiyaraj G, Srinivasan S, Kim Y J, et al. Acclimation of hydrogen peroxide enhances salts tolerance by activating defense-related proteins in Panax ginseng C.A. Meyer. Molecular Biology Reports, 2014, 41(6): 3761-3771. |
15 | Sun C, Liu L, Lu L, et al. Nitric oxide acts downstream of hydrogen peroxide in regulating aluminum induced antioxidant defense that enhances aluminum resistance in wheat seedlings. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2018, 145: 95-103. |
16 | Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2008, 59: 651-681. |
17 | Liu J X, Wang J C, Wang R J, et al. Response of Avena nuda L. seedlings to salt stress and the modulation of hydrogen peroxide. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2015, 34(9): 2506-2511. |
刘建新, 王金成, 王瑞娟, 等. 燕麦幼苗对盐胁迫的响应及过氧化氢对响应的调节. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(9): 2506-2511. | |
18 | Li J T, Qiu Z B, Zhang X W, et al. Exogenous hydrogen peroxide can enhance tolerance of wheat seedlings to stress. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2011, 33(3): 835-842. |
19 | Shan C J, Liu R Q. Exogenous hydrogen peroxide up-regulates the contents of ascorbate and glutathione in the leaves of Vigna radiata (Linn.) Wilczek. exposed to salt stress. Brazilian Journal of Botany, 2017, 40(2): 583-589. |
20 | Zhang M S, Xie B, Tan F, et al. Relationship among soluble protein, chlorophyll and ATP in sweet potato under water stress with drought resistance. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2006, 36(1): 13-16. |
张明生, 谢波, 谈锋, 等. 甘薯可溶性蛋白、叶绿素及ATP含量变化与品种抗旱性关系的研究. 中国农业科学, 2006, 36(1): 13-16. | |
21 | Sui N, Yang Z, Liu M, et al. Identification and transcriptomic profiling of genes involved in increasing sugar content during salt stress in sweet sorghum leaves. BMC Genomics, 2015, 16(1): 1-18. |
22 | Chen J X, Wang X F. Experimental supervision of plant physiology. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology Press, 2002. |
陈建勋, 王晓峰. 植物生理学实验指导. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2002. | |
23 | Li H S. Principle and technology of plant physiological and biochemical experiments. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2001: 134-170. |
李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2001: 134-170. | |
24 | Song L L, Zhang X, Ren Y, et al. Effects of salt stress on seed germination and seedling growth of alfalfa. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2008, 486(16): 21-24. |
宋莉璐, 张侠, 任艳, 等. 盐胁迫对苜蓿种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响. 现代农业科技, 2008, 486(16): 21-24. | |
25 | Parvin S, Lee O R, Sathiyaraj R, et al. Spermidine alleviates the growth of saline-stressed ginseng seedlings through antioxidative defense system. Gene, 2014, 537(1): 70-78. |
26 | Zhu L J, Yan Q J, Chen G S, et al. Exogenous H2O2 promotes seed germination under high salinity by regulating antioxidant enzymes, ABA and GA interaction in cucumber (Cucumis sativus). Plant Physiology Journal, 2019, 55(3): 342-348. |
朱利君, 闫秋洁, 陈光升, 等. 外源H2O2通过介导抗氧化酶、ABA和GA促进高盐胁迫下黄瓜种子的萌发. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55(3): 342-348. | |
27 | Cai F X, Chen D D, Yang F, et al. Regulation of growth and physiology of rice seedlings by H2O2. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(3): 74-77. |
蔡凤香, 陈豆豆, 杨飞, 等. H2O2对水稻幼苗生长和生理的调节. 江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(3): 74-77. | |
28 | Hu M L. Physiological response of Brassica napus L. to continued NaCl stress with different concentrations. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2014. |
胡慕兰. 不同NaCl浓度持续胁迫下油菜幼苗的生理响应. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2014. | |
29 | Yin L J, Zhu L. Study on saline-alkali resistance of wild barley at seedling stage. Acta Agristia Sinica, 1991, 1(1): 142-148. |
殷丽娟, 祝玲. 野大麦苗期抗盐碱性的研究. 草地学报, 1991, 1(1): 142-148. | |
30 | Li Y. Effect of exogenous nitric oxide and hydrogen peroxide to woad seedling growth and oxidative stress reaction under salt stress. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2009. |
李源. 外源NO与H2O2对盐胁迫下板蓝根幼苗生长及其氧化应激反应的影响. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2009. | |
31 | Liu J X, Wang J C, Wang R J, et al. The physiological mechanisms through which exogenous H2O2 increases the resistance of Avena nuda to salt stress. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(2): 216-222. |
刘建新, 王金成, 王瑞娟, 等. 外源过氧化氢提高燕麦耐盐性的生理机制. 草业学报, 2016, 25(2): 216-222. | |
32 | Feng Y L. Study on H2O2 regulates tomato seedling growth under salt stress. Shihezi: Shihezi University, 2019. |
冯玉龙. H2O2调控盐胁迫下番茄幼苗生长的研究. 石河子: 石河子大学, 2019. | |
33 | Liu A R. Effect of salt stress on the growth and the antioxidant enzyme activity of Thellungiella halophila. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2006, 26(2): 216-221. |
34 | Li W, Guo J J, Li H Y. Effects of H2O2 on growth of kale seedlings under salt stress. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(22): 149-152. |
李伟, 郭君洁, 李鸿雁. H2O2对盐胁迫下羽衣甘蓝幼苗生长的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(22): 149-152. | |
35 | Andrade C A, de Souza K B, de Oliveira S M, et al. Hydrogen peroxide promotes the tolerance of soybeans to waterlogging. Scientia Horticulturae, 2018, 232: 40-45. |
36 | Wen J F, Gong M, Liu Y, et al. Effect of hydrogen peroxide on growth and activity of some enzymes involved in proline metabolism of sweet corn seedlings under copper stress. Scientia Horticulturae, 2013, 164: 366-371. |
37 | Sun Y, Wang H, Liu S, et al. Exogenous application of hydrogen peroxide alleviates drought stress in cucumber seedlings. South African Journal of Botany, 2016, 106: 23-28. |
38 | Guo J M, Chen Y Y, Lu P Z, et al. Roles of endophytic bacteria in Suaeda salsa grown in coastal wetlands: Plant growth characteristics and salt tolerance mechanisms. Environmental Pollution, 2021, 287: 1-10. |
39 | Zhang B, Zhang H G. Regulation of exogenous hydrogen peroxide on wheat seedling salinity tolerance. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2007, 27(12): 2491-2495. |
张波, 张怀刚. 外源H2O2对小麦幼苗耐盐性的调节作用. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(12): 2491-2495. | |
40 | Li R Q, Wang Y X, Sun Y L, et al. Effects of salt stress on the growth, physiology, and biochemistry of five Bromus inermis varieties. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(1): 99-111. |
李瑞强, 王玉祥, 孙玉兰, 等. 盐胁迫对5份无芒雀麦苗期生长和生理生化的影响及综合性评价. 草业学报, 2023, 32(1): 99-111. | |
41 | Zhao Y. Determination of betaines and proline in plant tissues under salt-stress. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2004. |
赵勇. 盐胁迫下植物组织中甜菜碱和脯氨酸变化的研究. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2004. | |
42 | Cheng T L, Li H Y, Wu H W, et al. Comparison on osmotica accumulation of different salt-tolerant plants under salt stress. Forest Research, 2015, 28(6): 826-832. |
成铁龙, 李焕勇, 武海雯, 等. 盐胁迫下4种耐盐植物渗透调节物质积累的比较. 林业科学研究, 2015, 28(6): 826-832. | |
43 | Hao F, Liu X J, Zhang X L, et al. Effect of complex saline-alkali stress on nitrogen and phosphorus absorption and physiological traits of alfalfa seedlings. Journal of Desert Research, 2015, 35(5): 1268-1274. |
郝凤, 刘晓静, 张晓磊, 等. 混合盐碱胁迫对紫花苜蓿苗期氮磷吸收及生理特性的影响. 中国沙漠, 2015, 35(5): 1268-1274. | |
44 | Sun C C, Zhao H Y, Zheng C X. Effect of NaCl stress on osmolyte and proline metabolism in Ginkgo biloba seedling. Plant Physiology Journal, 2017, 53(3): 470-476. |
孙聪聪, 赵海燕, 郑彩霞. NaCl胁迫对银杏幼树渗透调节物质及脯氨酸代谢的影响. 植物生理学报, 2017, 53(3): 470-476. |
[1] | Shao-ying MA, Gui-ping CHEN, Na WANG, Lei MA, Rong-fang LIAN, Sheng LI, Xu-cheng ZHANG. Identification of potential autotoxic substances in pea soil and analysis of their autotoxic effects [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(6): 134-145. |
[2] | Chao-nan LI, Lei WANG, Ji-qiang ZHOU, Chang-xing ZHAO, Xiao-rong XIE, Jin-rong LIU. Effect of microplastics on the growth and physiological characteristics of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(5): 138-146. |
[3] | Shi-min ZHANG, Jiao-yang ZHAO, Hui-sen ZHU, Kai WEI, Yong-xin WANG. Effects of selenium on metabolic transformation and morphogenesis in different varieties of alfalfa during the germination stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(4): 79-90. |
[4] | Li ZHOU, Sheng-zhen HOU, Zhi-you WANG, Bao-chun YANG, Li-juan HAN, Lin-sheng GUI. Changes in small intestinal morphology, digestive enzyme activity and antioxidant enzyme activities of female Tibetan sheep after substituting the maize component of a concentrate diet with palm meal [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 118-127. |
[5] | Zheng TIAN, Zheng-yu YANG, Zhong-jie LU, Ben LUO, Mao ZHANG, Rui DONG. Acid-aluminum adaptability and tolerance evaluation of 44 alfalfa cultivars [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 142-151. |
[6] | Yan-lan ZHAO, Xin-yi ZENG, Jin-chao GONG, Xiang-jun LI, Xu-xu LI, Shan LIU, Xin-quan ZHANG, Ji-qiong ZHOU. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the salt tolerance of Trifolium repens [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 179-188. |
[7] | Xiang LI, Meng ZHANG, Chun-zeng LIU, Yi-fei ZHU, Xiao-xin YE. Effects of dialectric barrier discharge plasma treatment on seed germination and physiological characteristics of Astragalus sinicus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(10): 129-140. |
[8] | Hao-yu XU, Ying ZHAO, Qian RUAN, Xiao-lin ZHU, Bao-qiang WANG, Xiao-hong WEI. Resistance of quinoa seedlings under different salt-alkali stress levels [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(1): 122-130. |
[9] | Xiao-long WANG, Zhao YANG, Yong-cai LAI, Hong LI, Peng ZHONG, Yan-xia XU, Hua CHAI, Sha-sha LI, Yue WU, Min-chao SONG, Jing-ming ZHOU. Effect of root traits of Medicago sativa lines with fall dormancy on overwintering [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(1): 144-153. |
[10] | Xing WANG, Wei HUANG, Shu-yan YU, Xiao-yun LI, Xue-qin GAO, Bing-zhe FU. Effect of water and fertilizer coupling on seed yield and composition of alfalfa grown with underground drip irrigation in Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(9): 76-85. |
[11] | Ying-zi GUO, Wen-qing JIA, Song-lin HE, Zheng WANG. Allelopathic effects of extracts of Sonchus asper on seed germination and seedling growth of three herbaceous flower species [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(9): 96-106. |
[12] | Wen-hui XIE, Li-juan HUANG, Li-li ZHAO, Lei-ting WANG, Wen-wu ZHAO. Effects of calcium salt stress on seed germination and seedling physiological characteristics of three Pueraria lobata germplasm lines [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(7): 220-233. |
[13] | Ya-nan LIU, Ren-jie YU, Yan-li GAO, Jun-mei KANG, Qing-chuan YANG, Zhi-hai WU, Zhen WANG. Expression pattern and biological functions of an annexin encoding gene MtANN2 in Medicago truncatula under salt stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(5): 124-134. |
[14] | Man-you LI, Dong-ning LI, Bin WANG, Xiao-yun LI, Xiao-tian SHEN, Li-juan CAO, Wang NI, Teng-fei WANG, Jian LAN. The effect of mixed sowing and sowing rate of different alfalfa varieties on the yield and quality of forage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(5): 61-75. |
[15] | Dong-rong HAN, Tuo YAO, Hai-yun LI, Shu-chao HUANG, Yan-shan YANG, Ya-min GAO, Chang-ning LI, Yin-cui ZHANG. Effects of combined application of microbial fertilizer and chemical fertilizer on the growth of Lolium perenne [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 136-143. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||