Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (9): 22-33.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025375
Previous Articles Next Articles
Yan-hao YU(
), Meng YAN, Yu-lin NIU, Yan QIN(
)
Received:2025-09-16
Revised:2025-11-03
Online:2026-09-20
Published:2026-07-27
Contact:
Yan QIN
Yan-hao YU, Meng YAN, Yu-lin NIU, Yan QIN. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus management on seed production of Festuca kryloviana in the Qinghai Lake region[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(9): 22-33.
处理 Treatment | 氮肥施量 Nitrogen fertilizer application | 磷肥施量 Phosphorus fertilizer application | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥施量 Nitrogen fertilizer application | 磷肥施量 Phosphorus fertilizer application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0P0 | 0 | 0 | N2P0 | 120 | 0 |
| N0P1 | 0 | 300 | N2P1 | 120 | 300 |
| N0P2 | 0 | 600 | N2P2 | 120 | 600 |
| N1P0 | 60 | 0 | N3P0 | 180 | 0 |
| N1P1 | 60 | 300 | N3P1 | 180 | 300 |
| N1P2 | 60 | 600 | N3P2 | 180 | 600 |
Table 1 Fertilizer treatments of the experiment (kg·hm-2)
处理 Treatment | 氮肥施量 Nitrogen fertilizer application | 磷肥施量 Phosphorus fertilizer application | 处理 Treatment | 氮肥施量 Nitrogen fertilizer application | 磷肥施量 Phosphorus fertilizer application |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N0P0 | 0 | 0 | N2P0 | 120 | 0 |
| N0P1 | 0 | 300 | N2P1 | 120 | 300 |
| N0P2 | 0 | 600 | N2P2 | 120 | 600 |
| N1P0 | 60 | 0 | N3P0 | 180 | 0 |
| N1P1 | 60 | 300 | N3P1 | 180 | 300 |
| N1P2 | 60 | 600 | N3P2 | 180 | 600 |
因子 Factors | 株高Plant height | 茎粗Stem diameter | 干草产量Hay yield | 穗长Spike length | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 27.931 | <0.001 | 49.085 | <0.001 | 7.987 | <0.001 | 1.701 | 0.167 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 4.112 | 0.017 | 5.526 | 0.005 | 0.167 | 0.847 | 3.741 | 0.025 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 29.026 | <0.001 | 65.652 | <0.001 | 6.704 | 0.011 | 35.282 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 2.613 | 0.018 | 4.673 | <0.001 | 1.961 | 0.075 | 6.000 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 3.786 | 0.011 | 4.036 | 0.008 | 0.632 | 0.595 | 4.730 | 0.003 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 0.345 | 0.708 | 4.736 | 0.010 | 0.484 | 0.617 | 0.407 | 0.666 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 1.280 | 0.266 | 0.367 | 0.899 | 0.810 | 0.564 | 1.748 | 0.110 |
Table 2 Interannual analysis of variance (ANOVA) of agronomic traits in F. kryloviana under different nitrogen and phosphorus additions
因子 Factors | 株高Plant height | 茎粗Stem diameter | 干草产量Hay yield | 穗长Spike length | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 27.931 | <0.001 | 49.085 | <0.001 | 7.987 | <0.001 | 1.701 | 0.167 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 4.112 | 0.017 | 5.526 | 0.005 | 0.167 | 0.847 | 3.741 | 0.025 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 29.026 | <0.001 | 65.652 | <0.001 | 6.704 | 0.011 | 35.282 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 2.613 | 0.018 | 4.673 | <0.001 | 1.961 | 0.075 | 6.000 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 3.786 | 0.011 | 4.036 | 0.008 | 0.632 | 0.595 | 4.730 | 0.003 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 0.345 | 0.708 | 4.736 | 0.010 | 0.484 | 0.617 | 0.407 | 0.666 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 1.280 | 0.266 | 0.367 | 0.899 | 0.810 | 0.564 | 1.748 | 0.110 |
因子 Factors | 生殖枝数Number of reproductive branches | 小花数 Number of florets | 小穗数 Number of spikelet | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per panicle | 千粒重 1000-seed weight | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 26.758 | <0.001 | 4.655 | 0.004 | 2.041 | 0.112 | 4.050 | 0.009 | 8.251 | <0.001 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 3.071 | 0.050 | 41.967 | <0.001 | 60.192 | <0.001 | 10.523 | 0.002 | 3.626 | 0.030 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 18.999 | <0.001 | 43.130 | <0.001 | 59.184 | <0.001 | 10.170 | 0.002 | 123.208 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 1.132 | 0.348 | 0.363 | 0.901 | 1.225 | 0.298 | 0.296 | 0.938 | 1.996 | 0.072 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 6.363 | <0.001 | 0.817 | 0.487 | 3.040 | 0.032 | 0.737 | 0.532 | 3.937 | 0.010 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 3.207 | 0.044 | 0.187 | 0.829 | 1.683 | 0.190 | 0.950 | 0.390 | 2.640 | 0.076 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 3.522 | 0.003 | 1.009 | 0.423 | 0.784 | 0.584 | 0.550 | 0.769 | 1.698 | 0.127 |
Table 3 Interannual analysis of variance (ANOVA) of seed yield components of F. kryloviana under different nitrogen and phosphorus additions
因子 Factors | 生殖枝数Number of reproductive branches | 小花数 Number of florets | 小穗数 Number of spikelet | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per panicle | 千粒重 1000-seed weight | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 26.758 | <0.001 | 4.655 | 0.004 | 2.041 | 0.112 | 4.050 | 0.009 | 8.251 | <0.001 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 3.071 | 0.050 | 41.967 | <0.001 | 60.192 | <0.001 | 10.523 | 0.002 | 3.626 | 0.030 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 18.999 | <0.001 | 43.130 | <0.001 | 59.184 | <0.001 | 10.170 | 0.002 | 123.208 | <0.001 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 1.132 | 0.348 | 0.363 | 0.901 | 1.225 | 0.298 | 0.296 | 0.938 | 1.996 | 0.072 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 6.363 | <0.001 | 0.817 | 0.487 | 3.040 | 0.032 | 0.737 | 0.532 | 3.937 | 0.010 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 3.207 | 0.044 | 0.187 | 0.829 | 1.683 | 0.190 | 0.950 | 0.390 | 2.640 | 0.076 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 3.522 | 0.003 | 1.009 | 0.423 | 0.784 | 0.584 | 0.550 | 0.769 | 1.698 | 0.127 |
因子 Factors | 潜在种子产量Potential seed yield | 表现种子产量Expressed seed yield | 实际种子产量Actual seed yield | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 12.979 | <0.001 | 8.817 | <0.001 | 16.431 | <0.001 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 6.722 | 0.004 | 4.984 | 0.015 | 0.934 | 0.406 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 5.336 | 0.029 | 2.916 | 0.100 | 2.438 | 0.131 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 0.379 | 0.886 | 0.339 | 0.910 | 3.807 | 0.007 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 0.811 | 0.500 | 0.351 | 0.789 | 2.083 | 0.127 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 2.500 | 0.102 | 0.396 | 0.677 | 0.643 | 0.534 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 0.819 | 0.525 | 0.773 | 0.553 | 1.024 | 0.413 |
Table 4 Interannual analysis of variance (ANOVA) of seed yield in F. kryloviana under different nitrogen and phosphorus additions
因子 Factors | 潜在种子产量Potential seed yield | 表现种子产量Expressed seed yield | 实际种子产量Actual seed yield | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | |
| 氮肥Nitrogen fertilizer (N) | 12.979 | <0.001 | 8.817 | <0.001 | 16.431 | <0.001 |
| 磷肥Phosphorus fertilizer (P) | 6.722 | 0.004 | 4.984 | 0.015 | 0.934 | 0.406 |
| 年份Year (Y) | 5.336 | 0.029 | 2.916 | 0.100 | 2.438 | 0.131 |
| 氮肥×磷肥N×P | 0.379 | 0.886 | 0.339 | 0.910 | 3.807 | 0.007 |
| 氮肥×年份N×Y | 0.811 | 0.500 | 0.351 | 0.789 | 2.083 | 0.127 |
| 磷肥×年份P×Y | 2.500 | 0.102 | 0.396 | 0.677 | 0.643 | 0.534 |
| 氮肥×磷肥×年份N×P×Y | 0.819 | 0.525 | 0.773 | 0.553 | 1.024 | 0.413 |
处理 Treatments | 潜在种子产量Potential seed yield | 表现种子产量Expressed seed yield | 实际种子产量Actual seed yield | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
| N0P0 (CK) | 857.31±144.46e | 1164.72±61.25d | 710.14±15.65d | 784.40±65.39d | 522.50±46.70c | 532.08±12.68fg |
| N0P1 | 885.48±156.31e | 1287.15±169.42cd | 689.31±73.85d | 909.92±130.20cd | 517.43±74.27c | 373.89±11.27h |
| N0P2 | 1434.13±226.98cd | 1398.54±139.93cd | 861.32±51.87d | 1117.25±93.70bcd | 497.20±103.79c | 488.40±11.11g |
| N1P0 | 1509.74±181.35bcd | 1696.27±349.99abcd | 1177.58±95.03c | 1295.52±237.57bc | 675.43±90.49bc | 603.86±21.09de |
| N1P1 | 1692.93±275.93abcd | 1402.58±78.48cd | 1474.89±143.84ab | 1089.22±48.66cd | 780.22±230.53ab | 604.70±25.08de |
| N1P2 | 1519.97±363.61bcd | 1766.02±231.33abcd | 1340.39±271.41bc | 1537.64±149.52ab | 645.83±96.99bc | 639.69±10.41cd |
| N2P0 | 1513.43±266.93bcd | 2125.72±172.60ab | 1217.86±83.11c | 1833.31±178.15a | 668.80±152.78bc | 720.00±17.08b |
| N2P1 | 2010.88±403.47a | 1972.63±182.13abc | 1483.46±175.66ab | 1535.56±111.99ab | 746.17±135.17ab | 682.54±19.31bc |
| N2P2 | 1575.40±213.18abcd | 2218.73±278.41a | 1174.39±115.77c | 1803.44±206.55a | 823.75±133.60ab | 781.46±23.64a |
| N3P0 | 1325.67±205.64d | 1468.02±150.83bcd | 1134.88±106.87c | 1128.43±103.50bcd | 919.17±336.73a | 574.60±16.79ef |
| N3P1 | 1798.34±157.54abc | 1864.74±191.77abcd | 1448.34±155.28b | 1292.63±110.95bc | 792.50±147.26ab | 657.27±14.50cd |
| N3P2 | 1946.87±361.48ab | 1745.01±147.28abcd | 1680.00±45.30a | 1267.24±126.17bc | 687.20±154.66bc | 735.34±31.27ab |
Table 5 Effects of combined application of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on the potential seed yield, expressed seed yield, and actual seed yield of F. kryloviana (kg·hm-2)
处理 Treatments | 潜在种子产量Potential seed yield | 表现种子产量Expressed seed yield | 实际种子产量Actual seed yield | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | 2023 | 2024 | |
| N0P0 (CK) | 857.31±144.46e | 1164.72±61.25d | 710.14±15.65d | 784.40±65.39d | 522.50±46.70c | 532.08±12.68fg |
| N0P1 | 885.48±156.31e | 1287.15±169.42cd | 689.31±73.85d | 909.92±130.20cd | 517.43±74.27c | 373.89±11.27h |
| N0P2 | 1434.13±226.98cd | 1398.54±139.93cd | 861.32±51.87d | 1117.25±93.70bcd | 497.20±103.79c | 488.40±11.11g |
| N1P0 | 1509.74±181.35bcd | 1696.27±349.99abcd | 1177.58±95.03c | 1295.52±237.57bc | 675.43±90.49bc | 603.86±21.09de |
| N1P1 | 1692.93±275.93abcd | 1402.58±78.48cd | 1474.89±143.84ab | 1089.22±48.66cd | 780.22±230.53ab | 604.70±25.08de |
| N1P2 | 1519.97±363.61bcd | 1766.02±231.33abcd | 1340.39±271.41bc | 1537.64±149.52ab | 645.83±96.99bc | 639.69±10.41cd |
| N2P0 | 1513.43±266.93bcd | 2125.72±172.60ab | 1217.86±83.11c | 1833.31±178.15a | 668.80±152.78bc | 720.00±17.08b |
| N2P1 | 2010.88±403.47a | 1972.63±182.13abc | 1483.46±175.66ab | 1535.56±111.99ab | 746.17±135.17ab | 682.54±19.31bc |
| N2P2 | 1575.40±213.18abcd | 2218.73±278.41a | 1174.39±115.77c | 1803.44±206.55a | 823.75±133.60ab | 781.46±23.64a |
| N3P0 | 1325.67±205.64d | 1468.02±150.83bcd | 1134.88±106.87c | 1128.43±103.50bcd | 919.17±336.73a | 574.60±16.79ef |
| N3P1 | 1798.34±157.54abc | 1864.74±191.77abcd | 1448.34±155.28b | 1292.63±110.95bc | 792.50±147.26ab | 657.27±14.50cd |
| N3P2 | 1946.87±361.48ab | 1745.01±147.28abcd | 1680.00±45.30a | 1267.24±126.17bc | 687.20±154.66bc | 735.34±31.27ab |
指标 Index | 种子产量 Seed yield | 千粒重 1000-seed weight | 生殖枝数 Number of reproductive branches | 小穗数 Number of spikelet | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per panicle | 小花数 Number of florets | 穗长 Spike length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 种子产量Seed yield | 1.000 | 0.298** | 0.373** | -0.046 | 0.289** | 0.299** | -0.059 |
| 千粒重1000-seed weight | 1.000 | -0.078 | -0.152* | 0.094 | 0.224** | -0.036 | |
| 生殖枝数Number of reproductive branches | 1.000 | 0.228** | 0.168* | -0.050 | 0.050 | ||
| 小穗数Number of spikelet | 1.000 | -0.235** | -0.286** | 0.458** | |||
| 每穗粒数Number of grains per panicle | 1.000 | 0.389** | -0.049 | ||||
| 小花数Number of florets | 1.000 | 0.192** |
Table 6 Correlation analysis of seed yield traits in F. kryloviana
指标 Index | 种子产量 Seed yield | 千粒重 1000-seed weight | 生殖枝数 Number of reproductive branches | 小穗数 Number of spikelet | 每穗粒数 Number of grains per panicle | 小花数 Number of florets | 穗长 Spike length |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 种子产量Seed yield | 1.000 | 0.298** | 0.373** | -0.046 | 0.289** | 0.299** | -0.059 |
| 千粒重1000-seed weight | 1.000 | -0.078 | -0.152* | 0.094 | 0.224** | -0.036 | |
| 生殖枝数Number of reproductive branches | 1.000 | 0.228** | 0.168* | -0.050 | 0.050 | ||
| 小穗数Number of spikelet | 1.000 | -0.235** | -0.286** | 0.458** | |||
| 每穗粒数Number of grains per panicle | 1.000 | 0.389** | -0.049 | ||||
| 小花数Number of florets | 1.000 | 0.192** |
| 年份Year | 处理Treatments | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | 平均值Average | 排名Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | N0P0 | 0.148 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.138 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.069 | 12 |
| N0P1 | 0.362 | 0.216 | 0.133 | 0.010 | 0.467 | 0.000 | 0.057 | 0.178 | 11 | |
| N0P2 | 0.000 | 0.274 | 0.517 | 0.647 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.407 | 0.264 | 10 | |
| N1P0 | 0.639 | 0.379 | 0.540 | 0.780 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.406 | 0.549 | 8 | |
| N1P1 | 0.709 | 0.345 | 0.762 | 0.950 | 0.333 | 0.333 | 0.533 | 0.566 | 6 | |
| N1P2 | 0.591 | 0.328 | 0.946 | 1.000 | 0.133 | 0.000 | 0.349 | 0.478 | 9 | |
| N2P0 | 0.477 | 0.482 | 0.401 | 0.972 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.211 | 0.649 | 3 | |
| N2P1 | 0.634 | 0.520 | 0.803 | 0.246 | 0.400 | 0.278 | 1.000 | 0.554 | 7 | |
| N2P2 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.825 | 0.697 | 0.467 | 0.667 | 0.676 | 0.762 | 1 | |
| N3P0 | 0.661 | 0.650 | 0.740 | 0.000 | 0.467 | 0.833 | 0.673 | 0.575 | 5 | |
| N3P1 | 0.698 | 0.266 | 1.000 | 0.710 | 0.467 | 0.389 | 0.549 | 0.583 | 4 | |
| N3P2 | 0.598 | 0.446 | 0.919 | 0.991 | 0.533 | 0.722 | 0.774 | 0.712 | 2 | |
| 2024 | N0P0 | 0.388 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.210 | 0.124 | 0.000 | 0.081 | 0.115 | 12 |
| N0P1 | 0.000 | 0.248 | 0.307 | 0.541 | 0.124 | 0.062 | 0.002 | 0.183 | 11 | |
| N0P2 | 0.281 | 0.378 | 0.807 | 0.369 | 0.124 | 0.625 | 0.000 | 0.369 | 10 | |
| N1P0 | 0.564 | 0.720 | 0.886 | 0.000 | 0.742 | 0.437 | 0.317 | 0.524 | 7 | |
| N1P1 | 0.566 | 0.413 | 0.627 | 0.318 | 0.247 | 0.188 | 0.398 | 0.394 | 9 | |
| N1P2 | 0.652 | 0.503 | 0.730 | 0.522 | 0.000 | 0.625 | 0.517 | 0.507 | 8 | |
| N2P0 | 0.849 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.459 | 0.618 | 0.750 | 0.866 | 0.792 | 2 | |
| N2P1 | 0.757 | 0.865 | 0.429 | 0.739 | 0.989 | 1.000 | 0.549 | 0.761 | 3 | |
| N2P2 | 1.000 | 0.975 | 0.999 | 0.510 | 1.000 | 0.625 | 1.000 | 0.873 | 1 | |
| N3P0 | 0.492 | 0.743 | 0.534 | 0.223 | 0.618 | 0.688 | 0.435 | 0.533 | 6 | |
| N3P1 | 0.695 | 0.486 | 0.611 | 1.000 | 0.865 | 0.188 | 0.383 | 0.604 | 5 | |
| N3P2 | 0.887 | 0.897 | 0.560 | 0.427 | 0.618 | 0.500 | 0.373 | 0.609 | 4 |
Table 7 Ranking of membership function values for seed yield and its components of F. kryloviana under different nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization additions
| 年份Year | 处理Treatments | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | R6 | R7 | 平均值Average | 排名Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | N0P0 | 0.148 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.138 | 0.200 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.069 | 12 |
| N0P1 | 0.362 | 0.216 | 0.133 | 0.010 | 0.467 | 0.000 | 0.057 | 0.178 | 11 | |
| N0P2 | 0.000 | 0.274 | 0.517 | 0.647 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.407 | 0.264 | 10 | |
| N1P0 | 0.639 | 0.379 | 0.540 | 0.780 | 0.600 | 0.500 | 0.406 | 0.549 | 8 | |
| N1P1 | 0.709 | 0.345 | 0.762 | 0.950 | 0.333 | 0.333 | 0.533 | 0.566 | 6 | |
| N1P2 | 0.591 | 0.328 | 0.946 | 1.000 | 0.133 | 0.000 | 0.349 | 0.478 | 9 | |
| N2P0 | 0.477 | 0.482 | 0.401 | 0.972 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.211 | 0.649 | 3 | |
| N2P1 | 0.634 | 0.520 | 0.803 | 0.246 | 0.400 | 0.278 | 1.000 | 0.554 | 7 | |
| N2P2 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.825 | 0.697 | 0.467 | 0.667 | 0.676 | 0.762 | 1 | |
| N3P0 | 0.661 | 0.650 | 0.740 | 0.000 | 0.467 | 0.833 | 0.673 | 0.575 | 5 | |
| N3P1 | 0.698 | 0.266 | 1.000 | 0.710 | 0.467 | 0.389 | 0.549 | 0.583 | 4 | |
| N3P2 | 0.598 | 0.446 | 0.919 | 0.991 | 0.533 | 0.722 | 0.774 | 0.712 | 2 | |
| 2024 | N0P0 | 0.388 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.210 | 0.124 | 0.000 | 0.081 | 0.115 | 12 |
| N0P1 | 0.000 | 0.248 | 0.307 | 0.541 | 0.124 | 0.062 | 0.002 | 0.183 | 11 | |
| N0P2 | 0.281 | 0.378 | 0.807 | 0.369 | 0.124 | 0.625 | 0.000 | 0.369 | 10 | |
| N1P0 | 0.564 | 0.720 | 0.886 | 0.000 | 0.742 | 0.437 | 0.317 | 0.524 | 7 | |
| N1P1 | 0.566 | 0.413 | 0.627 | 0.318 | 0.247 | 0.188 | 0.398 | 0.394 | 9 | |
| N1P2 | 0.652 | 0.503 | 0.730 | 0.522 | 0.000 | 0.625 | 0.517 | 0.507 | 8 | |
| N2P0 | 0.849 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.459 | 0.618 | 0.750 | 0.866 | 0.792 | 2 | |
| N2P1 | 0.757 | 0.865 | 0.429 | 0.739 | 0.989 | 1.000 | 0.549 | 0.761 | 3 | |
| N2P2 | 1.000 | 0.975 | 0.999 | 0.510 | 1.000 | 0.625 | 1.000 | 0.873 | 1 | |
| N3P0 | 0.492 | 0.743 | 0.534 | 0.223 | 0.618 | 0.688 | 0.435 | 0.533 | 6 | |
| N3P1 | 0.695 | 0.486 | 0.611 | 1.000 | 0.865 | 0.188 | 0.383 | 0.604 | 5 | |
| N3P2 | 0.887 | 0.897 | 0.560 | 0.427 | 0.618 | 0.500 | 0.373 | 0.609 | 4 |
处理 Treatments | 2023 | 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
经济效益 Economic benefits (CNY·hm-2) | 增收 Increase income (CNY·hm-2) | 肥料贡献率 Fertilizer contribution rate (%) | 经济效益 Economic benefits (CNY·hm-2) | 增收 Increase income (CNY·hm-2) | 肥料贡献率 Fertilizer contribution rate (%) | |
| N0P0 | 8967.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9256.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| N0P1 | 8191.45 | -776.05 | -9.47 | 6379.78 | -2876.42 | -45.08 |
| N0P2 | 7629.43 | -1338.07 | -17.54 | 7656.00 | -1600.20 | -20.90 |
| N1P0 | 11154.02 | 2186.52 | 19.60 | 10173.90 | 917.70 | 9.02 |
| N1P1 | 12398.55 | 3431.05 | 27.67 | 9739.50 | 483.30 | 4.96 |
| N1P2 | 9711.45 | 743.95 | 7.66 | 9799.35 | 543.15 | 5.54 |
| N2P0 | 10671.43 | 1703.93 | 15.97 | 11798.00 | 2541.80 | 21.54 |
| N2P1 | 11647.69 | 2680.19 | 23.01 | 10709.85 | 1453.65 | 13.57 |
| N2P2 | 12724.25 | 3756.75 | 29.52 | 12062.40 | 2806.20 | 23.26 |
| N3P0 | 14690.98 | 5723.48 | 38.96 | 9509.57 | 253.37 | 2.66 |
| N3P1 | 12143.25 | 3175.75 | 26.15 | 10475.34 | 1219.14 | 11.63 |
| N3P2 | 10460.00 | 1492.50 | 14.27 | 11222.10 | 1965.90 | 17.52 |
Table 8 Effects of different nitrogen and phosphorus additions on the economic benefits of F. kryloviana seeds
处理 Treatments | 2023 | 2024 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
经济效益 Economic benefits (CNY·hm-2) | 增收 Increase income (CNY·hm-2) | 肥料贡献率 Fertilizer contribution rate (%) | 经济效益 Economic benefits (CNY·hm-2) | 增收 Increase income (CNY·hm-2) | 肥料贡献率 Fertilizer contribution rate (%) | |
| N0P0 | 8967.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9256.20 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| N0P1 | 8191.45 | -776.05 | -9.47 | 6379.78 | -2876.42 | -45.08 |
| N0P2 | 7629.43 | -1338.07 | -17.54 | 7656.00 | -1600.20 | -20.90 |
| N1P0 | 11154.02 | 2186.52 | 19.60 | 10173.90 | 917.70 | 9.02 |
| N1P1 | 12398.55 | 3431.05 | 27.67 | 9739.50 | 483.30 | 4.96 |
| N1P2 | 9711.45 | 743.95 | 7.66 | 9799.35 | 543.15 | 5.54 |
| N2P0 | 10671.43 | 1703.93 | 15.97 | 11798.00 | 2541.80 | 21.54 |
| N2P1 | 11647.69 | 2680.19 | 23.01 | 10709.85 | 1453.65 | 13.57 |
| N2P2 | 12724.25 | 3756.75 | 29.52 | 12062.40 | 2806.20 | 23.26 |
| N3P0 | 14690.98 | 5723.48 | 38.96 | 9509.57 | 253.37 | 2.66 |
| N3P1 | 12143.25 | 3175.75 | 26.15 | 10475.34 | 1219.14 | 11.63 |
| N3P2 | 10460.00 | 1492.50 | 14.27 | 11222.10 | 1965.90 | 17.52 |
| [1] | Qiu J. China: the third pole. Nature, 2008, 454(7203): 393-396. |
| [2] | Immerzeel W W, Lutz A F, Andrade M, et al. Importance and vulnerability of the world’s water towers. Nature, 2020, 577(7790): 364-369. |
| [3] | Shi Z H, Liang G L, Liu W H, et al. Overview of research on the adaptability of Festuca ovina in alpine regions. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2019, 49(2): 61-63. |
| 石正海, 梁国玲, 刘文辉, 等. 西北羊茅在高寒地区的适应性研究概况. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2019, 49(2): 61-63. | |
| [4] | Bartzialis D, Giannoulis K D, Gintsioudis I, et al. Assessing the efficiency of different nitrogen fertilization levels on sorghum yield and quality characteristics. Agriculture, 2023, 13(6): 1253. |
| [5] | Peçanha D A, Freitas M S M, Vieira M E, et al. Phosphorus fertilization affects growth, essential oil yield and quality of true lavender in Brazil. Industrial Crops and Products, 2021, 170: 113803. |
| [6] | Zhou Y, Li Z Y, Li Y Q, et al. Moderate deep banding of phosphorus enhanced winter wheat yield and fertilizer uptake efficiency by promoting nutrient absorption and translocation of pre-anthesis nutrient. Field Crops Research, 2025, 322: 109728. |
| [7] | Zhang B B, Wang Y J, Liu H J, et al. Optimal phosphorus management strategies to enhance crop productivity and soil phosphorus fertility in rapeseed-rice rotation. Chemosphere, 2023, 337: 139392. |
| [8] | Liu Q L, Wang X J, Wang J L, et al. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus combined application on forage yield of Elymus sibiricus in an alpine region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 193-202. |
| 刘启林, 王小军, 王金兰, 等. 氮磷配施对高寒区老芒麦饲草产量的影响. 草业学报, 2025, 34(6): 193-202. | |
| [9] | Zhao J J, Zheng W, Zhou D Y, et al. Effect of endophytic diazotroph on yield and photochemical efficiency of alfalfa under different nitrogen application levels. Pratacultural Science, 2025, 42(4): 980-990. |
| 赵晶晶, 郑伟, 周道媛, 等. 不同施氮水平下植物内生固氮菌对紫花苜蓿产量及光化学效率的影响. 草业科学, 2025, 42(4): 980-990. | |
| [10] | Chen L, Wang X L, Mao J P, et al. Dynamic changes of fruit development and comprehensive quality evaluation of different yellow-flesh kiwifruit cultivars. Non-wood Forest Research, 2024, 42(1): 220-231. |
| 陈璐, 王小玲, 毛积鹏, 等. 不同黄肉猕猴桃品种果实发育动态变化及品质综合评价. 经济林研究, 2024, 42(1): 220-231. | |
| [11] | Shen Q R. Soil and fertilizer sciences. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2021. |
| 沈其荣. 土壤肥料学通论. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2021. | |
| [12] | Hao H C. Characterization and health assessment of tobacco-planting soils in tobacco-rice rotation in Chenzhou. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry and Technology, 2025. |
| 郝汉驰. 郴州烟稻轮作植烟土壤特征与健康评价. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2025. | |
| [13] | Xu Z H, Yu H Y, Yang H, et al. The effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer combined application on the yield and nutrition value in vegetative growth and reproductive growth stages of local Elymus sibiricus. China Feed, 2024(19):137-145. |
| 徐正辉, 俞慧云, 杨浩, 等. 营养及生殖生长关键期氮磷肥配施对老芒麦产草量及营养价值的影响. 中国饲料, 2024(19):137-145. | |
| [14] | Zhang X J, Wei J J, Chen C J, et al. Optimization of annual nitrogen fertilizer application to increase the productivity of a forage triticale-silage maize multiple cropping system in an irrigated area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(4): 38-52. |
| 张晓娟, 魏娇娇, 陈彩锦, 等. 氮肥周年优化对灌区饲用小黑麦-青贮玉米复种系统生产力的影响. 草业学报, 2025, 34(4): 38-52. | |
| [15] | Xiao A P, Ma R, Wang B, et al. Effects of combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium on seed yield and its components of Stipa bungeana. Pratacultural Science, 2026, 43(2): 321-333. |
| 肖爱萍, 马榕, 王斌, 等. 氮磷钾配施对长芒草种子生产性能和发芽特性的影响. 草业科学, 2026, 43(2): 321-333. | |
| [16] | Yu A, Yang F, Zhang Y, et al. Influences of different phosphorus concentrations on the root distribution of Stylosanthes and black seed Paspalum. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2011, 20(3): 219-224. |
| 余爱, 杨帆, 张宇, 等. 不同施磷浓度对柱花草和黑籽雀稗根系分布的影响. 草业学报, 2011, 20(3): 219-224. | |
| [17] | Yu X N, Zhu P, Mao P S. Effects of nitrogenous fertilizer and phosphorus fertilizer applications on roots and seed yield of Elymus sibiricus. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(4): 637-643. |
| 于晓娜, 朱萍, 毛培胜. 氮磷处理对老芒麦根系及种子产量的影响. 草地学报, 2011, 19(4): 637-643. | |
| [18] | Shi Z H, Liu W H, Zhang Y C, et al. Combined application of phosphorus fertilizer and super absorbent polymer with low nitrogen fertilizer rate enhanced seed yield of Festuca kryloviana Reverd. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(11): 1967-1976. |
| 石正海, 刘文辉, 张永超, 等. 增磷减氮配合保水剂可提高多年生西北羊茅种子产量. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(11): 1967-1976. | |
| [19] | Bao G S, Zhou Q P, Han Z L. Effects of nitrogen and potassium fertilizer on yield and quality of oat. Pratacultural Science, 2008, 25(10): 48-53. |
| 鲍根生, 周青平, 韩志林. 氮、钾不同配比施肥对燕麦产量和品质的影响. 草业科学, 2008, 25(10): 48-53. | |
| [20] | Zuo Y. Effect of fertilizer application type on seed yield and its constitutive factors in three fescue varieties (lines). Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2022. |
| 左岩. 施肥种类对3个羊茅品种(系)种子产量及其构成因子的影响. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2022. | |
| [21] | Shi Z H. The seed formation and biomass distribution response of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers in alpine region for the Festuca ovina. Xining: Qinghai University, 2020. |
| 石正海. 高寒地区羊茅种子形成和生物量分配对氮磷肥的响应. 西宁: 青海大学, 2020. | |
| [22] | Shi Z H, Liu W H, Zhang Y C, et al. Seasonal nitrogen and phosphorus co-application enhances productivity of Festuca kryloviana cv. Huanhu. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 149-158. |
| 石正海, 刘文辉, 张永超, 等. 季节性氮磷配施提升环湖寒生羊茅生产性能. 草业学报, 2024, 33(1): 149-158. | |
| [23] | Song J C. Effect of combined application of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer on seed yield, quality of Elymus nutans and soil properties of grassland in alpine region. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2022. |
| 宋建超. 氮磷钾肥配施对高寒区垂穗披碱草种子产量、质量和土壤特性的影响. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2022. | |
| [24] | Bi Y X, Yang G W, Wei Y Q, et al. Low legume-grass seeding ratio combined with phosphorus fertilization promotes forage yield and soil quality in managed grasslands. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2024, 44(4): 36. |
| [25] | Shi Y J, Gao S, Zhou D H, et al. Fall nitrogen application increases seed yield, forage yield and nitrogen use efficiency more than spring nitrogen application in Leymus chinensis, a perennial grass. Field Crops Research, 2017, 214: 66-72. |
| [26] | Wang Y T, Xie J H, Fan F, et al. Phosphorus fertilization enhanced overwintering, root system and forage yield of late-seeded alfalfa in sodic soils. Scientific Reports, 2024, 14(1): 18090. |
| [27] | Wang X Y, Cao W X, Wang X J, et al. Herbage production and forage quality responses to cutting height and fertilization of legume-grass mixtures in the Hexi region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 99-110. |
| 王辛有, 曹文侠, 王小军, 等. 河西地区豆禾混播草地生产性能对刈割高度与施肥的响应. 草业学报, 2021, 30(4): 99-110. | |
| [28] | Su M, Liu Q J, Zhang Z Z, et al. The impact of nitrogen application on antioxidant characteristics of dryland potato leaves and yield in the mountainous region of southern Ningxia, China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2024, 32(8): 1341-1354. |
| 苏明, 柳强娟, 张正珍, 等. 施氮量对宁夏南部山区旱地马铃薯叶片抗氧化特性及产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2024, 32(8): 1341-1354. | |
| [29] | Chtouki M, Laaziz F, Naciri R, et al. Interactive effect of soil moisture content and phosphorus fertilizer form on chickpea growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake. Scientific Reports, 2022, 12(1): 6671. |
| [30] | Song J C, Yu X J, Wei K T, et al. Effects of nitrogen application on production performance and nutritional quality of Elymus nutans in alpine region. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564. |
| 宋建超, 鱼小军, 魏孔涛, 等. 施氮对高寒区垂穗披碱草饲草生产性能及营养品质的影响. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564. | |
| [31] | Law C N, Snape J W, Worland A J. The genetical relationship between height and yield in wheat. Heredity, 1978, 40(1): 133-151. |
| [32] | Zhou W. Study on the effect of wheat field with various foliar fertilizers. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2018. |
| 周巍. 多种叶面肥的小麦田间效果研究. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2018. | |
| [33] | Wen Z R, Liu H S, Xing G W, et al. Effects of chemical control agents and spraying time on stalk traits and yield formation of summer maize. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 52(22): 50-55. |
| 文章荣, 刘汉松, 邢国文, 等. 化控剂和喷施时期对夏玉米茎秆性状和产量形成的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2024, 52(22): 50-55. | |
| [34] | Sun T J, Mao P C, Wang C, et al. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer and plant growth regulator on fertile tiller development of spring tiller in Phleum pratense. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2025, 47(9): 37-44. |
| 孙铁军, 毛培春, 王超, 等. 氮肥与生长调节剂对猫尾草春季分蘖生殖转化的影响. 中国草地学报, 2025, 47(9): 37-44. | |
| [35] | Tian G L, Zhou Y, Sun B, et al. Effects of nitrogen and transplanting density on the mechanisms of tillering dynamic of rice. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(4): 896-904. |
| 田广丽, 周毅, 孙博, 等. 氮素及栽培密度影响水稻分蘖动态的机制. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(4): 896-904. | |
| [36] | Wang M Y, Mao P S. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on seed yield, seed yield components and canopy NDVI of Elymus sibiricus. Pratacultural Science, 2014, 31(4): 683-688. |
| 王明亚, 毛培胜. 施氮、磷肥对老芒麦种子产量、产量组分及成熟期冠层NDVI值的影响. 草业科学, 2014, 31(4): 683-688. | |
| [37] | Chen X X, Zhang W, Liang X Y, et al. Physiological and developmental traits associated with the grain yield of winter wheat as affected by phosphorus fertilizer management. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1): 16580. |
| [38] | Chen D D, Li Q, Liu Z, et al. Effects of 9 forage species on soil properties in the alpine pastoral region of Qinghai Province. Grassland and Turf, 2016, 36(4): 41-47. |
| 陈懂懂, 李奇, 刘哲, 等. 9种牧草对青海同德牧区土壤特性的影响. 草原与草坪, 2016, 36(4): 41-47. | |
| [39] | Chen Z H, Han J G, Chen H M, et al. Effect of fertilization-N on tall fescue seed yield and yield components of seed crop. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2005, 13(3): 215-218. |
| 陈志宏, 韩建国, 陈会敏, 等. 施氮对高羊茅种子产量组分和产量的影响. 草地学报, 2005, 13(3): 215-218. |
| [1] | Zhi-gang SU, You-jian HAN, Jian-hang ZHANG, Jun-xi WU, Ya-mei XU, Baosaihenna, Yan-jun MIAO, Zhong-hua CAO. Effects of nitrogen application and sowing rates on the seed yield and quality of Elymus nutans ‘Baqing’ [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(7): 175-187. |
| [2] | Ling-fei XIANG, Feng-ju ZHANG, Yue LI, Xue-qin WANG, Jin-long LIU, Qiao-li MA. Effects of varied row spacings and sowing rates on forage and seed yield and quality of Echinochloa frumentacea in saline-alkali land [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(5): 126-138. |
| [3] | Wen-hui DENG, Xiao-na ZHAO, Jia-yi YONG, Si-yu GUAN, Guo-qiang HU, Teng-fei WANG, Hai-ying HU. Effects of intercropping oat with different densities on alfalfa seed yield and its constituent factors [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 100-111. |
| [4] | Yi-bo WANG, Xue-hua MING, Jian-yong ZHANG, Qi YUAN, Jian-ming DU, Bin WANG, Teng-fei WANG, Yi-yin ZHANG, Jian LAN, Le MU. Multi-trait evaluation of the production performance and seed yield of new oat germplasm materials in the arid area of Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 86-99. |
| [5] | Yang-kun LI, Zhuan-lin BEN, Jun-yu ZHANG, Hui-min YANG. A meta-analysis on the effect of fertilizer type on alfalfa seed yield under various climate and soil conditions [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(2): 54-67. |
| [6] | Yi-yin ZHANG, Ai-ping XIAO, Bin WANG, Teng-fei WANG, Hai-ying HU, Jian LAN. Effect of nitrogen application on grass productivity and energy use efficiency in a mixed forage sorghum/lablab planting [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(1): 40-52. |
| [7] | Hong-qian YU, Xue-peng MA, Han-guo ZENG, Xiao-yan SHAN, Man-li LI, Zhan-jun WANG. Effects of the amount and timing of subsurface drip irrigation on alfalfa seed production [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(1): 53-64. |
| [8] | Hong-lin WANG, Bin WEN, Yan-chun ZUO, Kai ZHANG, Zi-zhou WU, Xu YAN, Zheng-cai YUAN, Yu-chuan DENG, Lian XIAO, Hui CHEN, Jing KOU, Xiang-chao FU, Zhou-he DU. Effect of adding dietary whole-plant forage mulberry on the intestinal morphology, blood biochemical indicators, muscle amino acid content and economic return when raising Chuanbai rex rabbits [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(8): 199-210. |
| [9] | Yi-yin ZHANG, Bin WANG, Teng-fei WANG, Jian LAN, Hai-ying HU. Effects of intercropping triticale with alfalfa on system yield, resource utilization, and alfalfa seed yield [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(8): 43-53. |
| [10] | Wen-juan FAN, Jian-chao SONG, Xiao-juan ZHANG, Yu-hang SHENG, Jin-tao SHI, Long-ji ZHANG, Xiao-jun YU. The effects of combined nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on seed yield and quality of Medicago ruthenica in the Wuwei irrigation district, Gansu Province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(8): 54-65. |
| [11] | Qi-lin LIU, Xiao-jun WANG, Jin-lan WANG, Wen-hui LIU, Qiao-ling MA, Jian-hui LI, Sheng-yuan ZHANG, Wen-xia CAO, Wen LI. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus combined application on forage yield of Elymus sibiricus in an alpine region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 193-202. |
| [12] | Yao-bo LIU, Lu PEI, Chen-zhuo LIU, Xiao-xia LI, Bo-kun ZOU. A meta-analysis of fertilizer response of seed yield and seed yield components in Elymus sibiricus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 85-98. |
| [13] | Teng-fei WANG, Xia MA, Jin-long LIU, Bin WANG, Yi-yin ZHANG, Jia-wang LI, Jiang-ping MA, Xiao-bing WANG, Jian LAN. Analysis of the yield, quality and economic benefits from multiple cropping of fodder oats in the Yellow River irrigation area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(4): 27-37. |
| [14] | Xue HA, Jin-qing ZHANG, Fang-xu BAI, Xiang-rong MA, An-qi WANG, Hui-ling MA. Analysis of traits related to seed yield and nutrient utilization in the Kentucky bluegrass germplasm in Gansu [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(4): 54-67. |
| [15] | Tong-yao LI, Qing-ping ZHOU, You-jun CHEN, Yuan ZHAN, Hui WANG. Effects of nitrogen application rate on seed yield and nitrogen use efficiency of Elymus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3): 80-90. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||