Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2026, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 113-125.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2025204
Xiao-cong LI1,3(
), Ju-hui YAN1,3, Xing WANG1,3, Peng-fei HU1,3, Yu-nong YE1,3, Bing-zhe FU1,2,3(
)
Received:2025-05-21
Revised:2025-07-18
Online:2026-05-20
Published:2026-03-11
Contact:
Bing-zhe FU
Xiao-cong LI, Ju-hui YAN, Xing WANG, Peng-fei HU, Yu-nong YE, Bing-zhe FU. Effects of different inter-row planting ratios of alfalfa and smooth brome on grass production performance and soil physicochemical properties[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(5): 113-125.
物种 Species | 处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 叶面积 Leaf area (mm2) | 分枝数或分蘖数 Branch/tiller number | 茎叶比 Stem-leaf ratio | 干草产量 Hay yield (t?hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
紫花苜蓿 M. sativa | M1B1 | 92.78±1.08bc | 3.56±0.17a | 318.11±11.97ab | 210.00±7.93a | 1.71±0.07ab | 11.87±0.45c |
| M3B1 | 87.46±1.79d | 3.19±0.12a | 311.30±10.20b | 189.80±5.84ab | 1.75±0.05ab | 14.49±0.72b | |
| M1B2 | 94.74±1.04ab | 3.41±0.12a | 244.93±11.64c | 201.90±6.95ab | 1.67±0.06ab | 9.64±0.64d | |
| M2B1 | 87.89±1.57d | 3.34±0.14a | 237.09±11.72c | 181.80±7.62b | 1.59±0.04b | 15.19±0.86b | |
| M1B3 | 89.46±1.25cd | 3.37±0.12a | 246.71±10.74c | 210.30±8.77a | 1.57±0.06b | 7.38±0.31e | |
| CKM | 98.21±1.10a | 3.37±0.12a | 346.96±11.27a | 153.60±6.12c | 1.83±0.07a | 17.87±0.93a | |
无芒雀麦 B. inermis | M1B1 | 108.86±1.33a | 2.46±0.09a | 2068.86±109.87a | 269.08±15.76c | 0.98±0.08c | 4.07±0.20d |
| M3B1 | 102.56±1.59b | 2.61±0.13a | 2229.82±101.63a | 286.42±21.23bc | 0.96±0.07c | 1.97±0.12e | |
| M1B2 | 108.11±1.03a | 2.54±0.10a | 1582.82±60.10b | 283.92±15.37bc | 1.34±0.15ab | 7.03±0.41c | |
| M2B1 | 107.36±1.33a | 2.52±0.10a | 1689.89±104.57b | 255.58±11.27c | 1.52±0.15a | 2.51±0.14e | |
| M1B3 | 107.78±1.51a | 2.54±0.11a | 1437.11±74.77bc | 327.67±16.86ab | 1.51±0.11a | 8.51±0.43b | |
| CKB | 87.71±1.40c | 2.61±0.12a | 1233.21±59.19c | 343.75±10.75a | 1.14±0.07bc | 9.70±0.43a |
Table 1 Effects of different inter-row planting ratios on agronomic traits of M. sativa and B. inermis
物种 Species | 处理 Treatment | 株高 Plant height (cm) | 茎粗 Stem diameter (mm) | 叶面积 Leaf area (mm2) | 分枝数或分蘖数 Branch/tiller number | 茎叶比 Stem-leaf ratio | 干草产量 Hay yield (t?hm-2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
紫花苜蓿 M. sativa | M1B1 | 92.78±1.08bc | 3.56±0.17a | 318.11±11.97ab | 210.00±7.93a | 1.71±0.07ab | 11.87±0.45c |
| M3B1 | 87.46±1.79d | 3.19±0.12a | 311.30±10.20b | 189.80±5.84ab | 1.75±0.05ab | 14.49±0.72b | |
| M1B2 | 94.74±1.04ab | 3.41±0.12a | 244.93±11.64c | 201.90±6.95ab | 1.67±0.06ab | 9.64±0.64d | |
| M2B1 | 87.89±1.57d | 3.34±0.14a | 237.09±11.72c | 181.80±7.62b | 1.59±0.04b | 15.19±0.86b | |
| M1B3 | 89.46±1.25cd | 3.37±0.12a | 246.71±10.74c | 210.30±8.77a | 1.57±0.06b | 7.38±0.31e | |
| CKM | 98.21±1.10a | 3.37±0.12a | 346.96±11.27a | 153.60±6.12c | 1.83±0.07a | 17.87±0.93a | |
无芒雀麦 B. inermis | M1B1 | 108.86±1.33a | 2.46±0.09a | 2068.86±109.87a | 269.08±15.76c | 0.98±0.08c | 4.07±0.20d |
| M3B1 | 102.56±1.59b | 2.61±0.13a | 2229.82±101.63a | 286.42±21.23bc | 0.96±0.07c | 1.97±0.12e | |
| M1B2 | 108.11±1.03a | 2.54±0.10a | 1582.82±60.10b | 283.92±15.37bc | 1.34±0.15ab | 7.03±0.41c | |
| M2B1 | 107.36±1.33a | 2.52±0.10a | 1689.89±104.57b | 255.58±11.27c | 1.52±0.15a | 2.51±0.14e | |
| M1B3 | 107.78±1.51a | 2.54±0.11a | 1437.11±74.77bc | 327.67±16.86ab | 1.51±0.11a | 8.51±0.43b | |
| CKB | 87.71±1.40c | 2.61±0.12a | 1233.21±59.19c | 343.75±10.75a | 1.14±0.07bc | 9.70±0.43a |
处理 Treatment | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP, %) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF, %) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF, %) | 相对饲喂价值 Relative feeding value (RFV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1B1 | 14.73±0.21b | 63.37±1.14b | 42.73±0.44b | 83.78±1.55b |
| M3B1 | 13.84±0.13c | 60.40±0.33c | 44.32±0.32a | 84.45±0.80b |
| M1B2 | 12.27±0.16d | 66.18±0.38a | 43.96±0.32a | 77.90±0.80c |
| M2B1 | 14.36±0.12b | 62.40±0.58b | 43.97±0.42a | 82.69±1.23b |
| M1B3 | 11.68±0.13e | 67.01±0.35a | 43.51±0.25ab | 78.75±0.76c |
| CKM | 16.21±0.18a | 55.23±0.62d | 40.22±0.46c | 97.29±1.81a |
| CKB | 10.73±0.25f | 65.77±0.22a | 39.11±0.32d | 82.61±0.48b |
Table 2 Forage nutritional quality under different inter-row planting ratios of M. sativa and B. inermis
处理 Treatment | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP, %) | 中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF, %) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF, %) | 相对饲喂价值 Relative feeding value (RFV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M1B1 | 14.73±0.21b | 63.37±1.14b | 42.73±0.44b | 83.78±1.55b |
| M3B1 | 13.84±0.13c | 60.40±0.33c | 44.32±0.32a | 84.45±0.80b |
| M1B2 | 12.27±0.16d | 66.18±0.38a | 43.96±0.32a | 77.90±0.80c |
| M2B1 | 14.36±0.12b | 62.40±0.58b | 43.97±0.42a | 82.69±1.23b |
| M1B3 | 11.68±0.13e | 67.01±0.35a | 43.51±0.25ab | 78.75±0.76c |
| CKM | 16.21±0.18a | 55.23±0.62d | 40.22±0.46c | 97.29±1.81a |
| CKB | 10.73±0.25f | 65.77±0.22a | 39.11±0.32d | 82.61±0.48b |
Fig.6 Redundancy analysis (RDA) of forage yield, crude protein yield (CPY), land equivalent ratio (LER) and soil nutrient content of different inter-row planting ratios
指标 Index | 主成分 Principal component (PC) | 指标 Index | 主成分 Principal component (PC) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| 粗蛋白含量Crude protein content | 0.171 | 0.079 | -0.072 | 酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fibre | -0.020 | 0.212 | -0.068 |
| 中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fibre | -0.180 | 0.042 | 0.041 | 全磷Total phosphorus | -0.013 | -0.225 | 0.044 |
| 粗蛋白产量Crude protein yield | 0.145 | 0.131 | -0.189 | 有效磷Effective phosphorus | -0.048 | 0.189 | 0.275 |
| 相对饲喂价值Relative feeding value | 0.164 | -0.099 | -0.048 | 全钾Total potassium | -0.050 | 0.118 | 0.314 |
| 全氮Total nitrogen | 0.157 | -0.026 | 0.264 | 有机质Organic matter | 0.121 | -0.053 | 0.330 |
| 碱解氮Alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen | 0.141 | 0.067 | 0.201 | 特征值Eigenvalue | 5.326 | 3.892 | 2.002 |
| 混合干草产量Mixed hay yield | 0.111 | 0.153 | -0.233 | 贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 40.971 | 29.941 | 15.398 |
| 速效钾Available potassium | -0.039 | 0.213 | 0.028 | 累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 40.971 | 70.913 | 86.310 |
Table 3 Eigenvalues and cumulative contributions rate of indicators under different inter-row planting ratios
指标 Index | 主成分 Principal component (PC) | 指标 Index | 主成分 Principal component (PC) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||
| 粗蛋白含量Crude protein content | 0.171 | 0.079 | -0.072 | 酸性洗涤纤维Acid detergent fibre | -0.020 | 0.212 | -0.068 |
| 中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fibre | -0.180 | 0.042 | 0.041 | 全磷Total phosphorus | -0.013 | -0.225 | 0.044 |
| 粗蛋白产量Crude protein yield | 0.145 | 0.131 | -0.189 | 有效磷Effective phosphorus | -0.048 | 0.189 | 0.275 |
| 相对饲喂价值Relative feeding value | 0.164 | -0.099 | -0.048 | 全钾Total potassium | -0.050 | 0.118 | 0.314 |
| 全氮Total nitrogen | 0.157 | -0.026 | 0.264 | 有机质Organic matter | 0.121 | -0.053 | 0.330 |
| 碱解氮Alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen | 0.141 | 0.067 | 0.201 | 特征值Eigenvalue | 5.326 | 3.892 | 2.002 |
| 混合干草产量Mixed hay yield | 0.111 | 0.153 | -0.233 | 贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 40.971 | 29.941 | 15.398 |
| 速效钾Available potassium | -0.039 | 0.213 | 0.028 | 累积贡献率 Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 40.971 | 70.913 | 86.310 |
处理 Treatment | 隶属函数值 Membership function value | 排名 Ranking |
|---|---|---|
| M1B1 | 0.632 | 2 |
| M3B1 | 0.604 | 3 |
| M1B2 | 0.236 | 6 |
| M2B1 | 0.764 | 1 |
| M1B3 | 0.310 | 5 |
| CKM | 0.589 | 4 |
| CKB | 0.184 | 7 |
Table 4 Membership function values and their ranking for different inter-row planting ratios
处理 Treatment | 隶属函数值 Membership function value | 排名 Ranking |
|---|---|---|
| M1B1 | 0.632 | 2 |
| M3B1 | 0.604 | 3 |
| M1B2 | 0.236 | 6 |
| M2B1 | 0.764 | 1 |
| M1B3 | 0.310 | 5 |
| CKM | 0.589 | 4 |
| CKB | 0.184 | 7 |
| [1] | Xu Y Y, Hou Y R, Wang J, et al. Effects of intercropping mixture of legume and grass on grassland production performance and soil nutrients. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2024, 46(10): 75-86. |
| 许莹月, 侯钰荣, 王静, 等. 豆禾间行混播对草地生产性能与土壤养分的影响. 中国草地学报, 2024, 46(10): 75-86. | |
| [2] | Wu X J, Yang M, Lu Y X, et al. Effects of mixing ratio and nitrogen fertilization on root characteristics in the common vetch/oat mixture. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(9): 106-116. |
| 吴晓娟, 杨梅, 芦奕晓, 等. 混播比例和施氮肥对箭筈豌豆/燕麦草地根系特性的影响. 草业学报, 2020, 29(9): 106-116. | |
| [3] | Wang Y F, Liu H Q, Zhao X N, et al. Effects of water and root separation on nitrogen uptake, utilization and transfer in a gramineae-legume intercropping system. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2024, 38(4): 279-287. |
| 王一帆, 刘华清, 赵西宁, 等. 禾豆间作系统水分和根系分隔对牧草氮素吸收利用及转移的影响. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(4): 279-287. | |
| [4] | Xiao Y. Study on yield and efficiency increasing mechanism of the mixed planting mode of alfalfa and orchard grass in different row ratios. Taiyuan: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2021. |
| 肖毅. 苜蓿/鸭茅不同行比混播模式增产增效机制研究. 太原: 山西农业大学, 2021. | |
| [5] | Zhao L J, Kou X X, Wang T M. Response of the relationship between mixed sowing of alfalfa and Elymus nutans to water content. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2025, 47(2): 80-90. |
| 赵力军, 寇潇雪, 王铁梅. 紫花苜蓿和垂穗披碱草混播种间关系对水分的响应. 中国草地学报, 2025, 47(2): 80-90. | |
| [6] | Effects of mixed sowing ratio on root properties of Medicago sativa and Agropyron cristatum. Pratacultural Science, 2025, 42(5): 1222-1234. |
| 侯钰荣, 许莹月, 兰吉勇, 等. 紫花苜蓿和冰草混播比例对根系属性的影响. 草业科学, 2025, 42(5): 1222-1234. | |
| [7] | Zhou D C. Study on forage productivity and soil physical and chemical properties of alfalfa-sainfoin mixed pasture in the Longzhong Loess Plateau. Lanzhou: Lanzhou University, 2019. |
| 周栋昌. 陇中黄土高原紫花苜蓿与红豆草混播草地生产性能和土壤理化性质研究. 兰州: 兰州大学, 2019. | |
| [8] | Zheng W, Zhu J Z, Jianaerguli, et al. Effects of different mixed sowing patterns on production performance of legume-grass mixture. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2011, 33(5): 45-52. |
| 郑伟, 朱进忠, 加娜尔古丽, 等. 不同混播方式对豆禾混播草地生产性能的影响. 中国草地学报, 2011, 33(5): 45-52. | |
| [9] | Li J K, Sun T, Wangzha, et al. Effects on mixture sowing ratio on the yield and quality of both vetch and oat in Tibet. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2011, 19(5): 830-833. |
| 李佶恺, 孙涛, 旺扎, 等. 西藏地区燕麦与箭筈豌豆不同混播比例对牧草产量和质量的影响. 草地学报, 2011, 19(5): 830-833. | |
| [10] | Liang S W, Zhou H N, Du G J, et al. Effects of maize/alfalfa intercropping on microbial communities in cinnamon soil. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/21.1148.Q.20250626.1150.004. |
| 梁思维, 周桦楠, 杜桂娟, 等. 玉米/苜蓿间作对褐土微生物群落的影响. 生态学杂志, 2025, https://link.cnki.net/urlid/21.1148.Q.20250626.1150.004. | |
| [11] | Cao X Q, Lin Y, Zhao L J, et al. Effects of mixed sowing of forage oats and legumes on forage yield and stem-leaf ratio. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2024, 46(11): 58-65. |
| 曹雪乔, 林悦, 赵丽娟, 等. 饲用燕麦与豆科牧草混播对饲草产量及茎叶比的影响. 中国草地学报, 2024, 46(11): 58-65. | |
| [12] | Chen Y L, Qi S, Xu R X, et al. Effects of planting row number and density on maize performance in Hexi Corridor corn-alfalfa intercropping system. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(6): 2013-2022. |
| 陈彦龙, 齐帅, 许瑞轩, 等. 河西走廊玉米-苜蓿间作体系行数与密度对玉米生产性能的影响. 草地学报, 2025, 33(6): 2013-2022. | |
| [13] | Huang N. Effect of nitrogen addition and grass root secretion on inter-rooted nitrogen deposition and nodule fixation in a legume-grass mixed grassland. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia University, 2023. |
| 黄楠. 氮添加和禾草根系分泌物对豆禾混播氮沉积及结瘤固氮的影响. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古大学, 2023. | |
| [14] | Zhou Y X, Yue X P, Wei Z W, et al. Development prospect of mixed planting of legume and gramineae forage in winter fallow field in the Yangtze-Huaihe region. Pratacultural Science, 2021, 38(2): 304-315. |
| 周雅欣, 乐祥鹏, 魏臻武, 等. 江淮地区冬闲田豆禾牧草混播生产模式的发展前景. 草业科学, 2021, 38(2): 304-315. | |
| [15] | Qi F, Li H G, Chen W W, et al. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on yield of Medicago sativa-Leymus chinensis mixed grassland. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2024, 46(6): 49-56. |
| 齐非, 李海港, 陈薇薇, 等. 氮磷添加对紫花苜蓿-羊草混播草地生产力的影响. 中国草地学报, 2024, 46(6): 49-56. | |
| [16] | Wu L T, Chen S, Hu M J, et al. Effect of different mixing ratio of alfalfa and Bromus inermis on silage quality. Feed Research, 2024, 47(13): 118-123. |
| 乌力塔, 陈肃, 胡梦洁, 等. 紫花苜蓿与无芒雀麦不同混合比例对其青贮品质的影响. 饲料研究, 2024, 47(13): 118-123. | |
| [17] | Zhang Y L, Teng Z, Zhang Y X. Effects of the pattern and proportion of mixed sowing alfalfa-smooth brome on the carbon and nitrogen metabolism in its leaves. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(12): 3744-3749. |
| 张永亮, 滕泽, 张玉霞. 苜蓿-无芒雀麦混播方式和比例对禾草叶片碳氮代谢的影响. 草地学报, 2023, 31(12): 3744-3749. | |
| [18] | Yu Z, Jia Y S, Li C F. Forage product inspection. Beijing: Science Press, 2013: 28-43. |
| 玉柱, 贾玉山, 李存福. 饲草产品检验. 北京: 科学出版社, 2013: 28-43. | |
| [19] | Bao S D. Soil agrochemical analysis (the third edition). Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000. |
| 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第3版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. | |
| [20] | Sun G T, Bao G R, Tai J C, et al. Effect of maize and peanut intercropping on crop and soil characteristics. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2025, 41(5): 7-12. |
| 孙广涛, 包桂荣, 邰继承, 等. 玉米花生间作对作物及土壤特性的影响. 中国农学通报, 2025, 41(5): 7-12. | |
| [21] | Chen X, Li S S, Wang N X, et al. Effects of different intercropping patterns on interspecific competition pattern and production performance of triticale and common vetch grassland. Grassland and Turf, 2023, 43(5): 5-14. |
| 陈雪, 黎松松, 王宁欣, 等. 不同间作方式对小黑麦+箭筈豌豆草地种间竞争格局和生产性能的影响. 草原与草坪, 2023, 43(5): 5-14. | |
| [22] | Xie K Y, Zhang Y J, Li X L, et al. Competition and coexistence of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) and smooth brome (Bromus inermis Layss.) in mixture. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(18): 3767-3778. |
| 谢开云, 张英俊, 李向林, 等. 无芒雀麦和紫花苜蓿在(1∶1)混播中的竞争与共存. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(18): 3767-3778. | |
| [23] | Zhang Y Y, Wang B, Wang T F, et al. Effects of intercropping triticale with alfalfa on system yield resource utilization and alfalfa seed yield. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(8): 43-53. |
| 张译尹, 王斌, 王腾飞, 等. 苜蓿种子田间作小黑麦对饲草产量、水分利用及苜蓿种子产量的影响. 草业学报, 2025, 34(8): 43-53. | |
| [24] | Wang X. Study on the spatiotemporal characteristics of alfalfa/gramineous forage intercropping effects and root interactions. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2023: 74-79. |
| 汪雪. 紫花苜蓿/禾本科牧草间作效应及其根系互作关系的时空特征研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2023: 74-79. | |
| [25] | Feng Q, He X L, Wang B, et al. A study of mixed sowing effects for oat and common vetch in the Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(3): 107-119. |
| 冯琴, 何小莉, 王斌, 等. 宁夏引黄灌区燕麦与箭筈豌豆的混播效果研究. 草业学报, 2024, 33(3): 107-119. | |
| [26] | Xu Q. Study on the mixture combination and mixed ratio of triticale and peas in the alpine pastoral area of Gansu. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2021. |
| 徐强. 甘肃高寒牧区小黑麦与豌豆的混播组合及混播比例研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2021. | |
| [27] | Dou Z Y, Li S S, Tian X C, et al. Effects of different mixed sowing ratios on soil nitrogen substitution potential in mixed-sowing grassland with Vicia sativa+Avena sativa. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(11): 2424-2433. |
| 窦梓镱, 黎松松, 田新春, 等. 不同混播比例对箭筈豌豆+燕麦混播草地土壤氮素替代潜力的影响. 草业科学, 2022, 39(11): 2424-2433. | |
| [28] | Guan Z X, Naerkezi, Zhu Y Q, et al. Effect of different sowing patterns on production performance and soil nutrients in Avena sativa+Vicia sativa mixtures. Pratacultural Science, 2019, 36(3): 772-784. |
| 关正翾, 娜尔克孜, 朱亚琼, 等. 不同混播方式下燕麦+箭筈豌豆混播草地的生产性能及土壤养分特征. 草业科学, 2019, 36(3): 772-784. | |
| [29] | Wang J H. Effects of corn/alfalfa intercropping on soil nutrient, enzyme activity and plant growth. Guiyang: Guizhou University, 2019. |
| 王家豪. 玉米/苜蓿间作对土壤养分、酶活性及植物生长的影响. 贵阳: 贵州大学, 2019. | |
| [30] | Qian S Y, De K J, Feng T X, et al. Effect of annual grass-legume mixture on soil nutrients and forage nutrients in alpine region. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2022, 52(4): 34-40. |
| 钱诗祎, 德科加, 冯廷旭, 等. 高寒地区一年生禾豆混播对土壤养分与牧草营养的影响. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2022, 52(4): 34-40. | |
| [31] | Yu T F, Hao F, Zhang Y L, et al. Response of soil enzyme and soil fertility of artificial grassland in sandy soil to different mixture ratio of alfalfa and smooth brome. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1217-1223. |
| 于铁峰, 郝凤, 张永亮, 等. 沙地豆禾混播草地土壤酶与土壤养分对混播比例的响应. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1217-1223. | |
| [32] | Guo C, Zhao Y L, Li X J, et al. Effect of sowing ratio on interspecific relationships between species and grassland productivity in legume-grass mixtures. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(11): 2307-2316. |
| 郭川, 赵艳兰, 李香君, 等. 不同豆禾混播比例对植物种间关系及草地生产力的影响. 草业科学, 2022, 39(11): 2307-2316. | |
| [33] | Zhou J, Wang Z C, Yang F. Research progress about phytoremediation mechanisms in saline-sodic soils. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2024, 43(5): 1453-1462. |
| 周杰, 王志春, 杨帆. 盐碱土壤植物修复机制研究进展. 生态学杂志, 2024, 43(5): 1453-1462. | |
| [34] | Duan C, Shi P L, Zong N, et al. Feeding solution: Crop-livestock integration via crop-forage rotation in the southern Tibetan Plateau. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, 284: 106589. |
| [35] | Wang W H, Zheng H B, Wu Y P, et al. An assessment of background removal approaches for improved estimation of rice leaf nitrogen concentration with unmanned aerial vehicle multispectral imagery at various observation times. Field Crops Research, 2022, 283: 108543. |
| [36] | Shi L, Wang J, Chen Y, et al. Effects of combined application of bio-bacterial manure with reduced chemical fertilizer on pigment pepper growth. Xinjiang Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 58(5): 854-865. |
| 石磊, 王军, 陈云, 等. 化肥减量配施生物菌肥对色素辣椒生长的影响. 新疆农业科学, 2021, 58(5): 854-865. | |
| [37] | Zhang X J, Yang H, Song J C, et al. Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer use on oat yield and soil nutrients in the Sanjiangyuan region. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2025, 47(1): 54-64. |
| 张小娟, 杨航, 宋建超, 等. 化肥减施对三江源区燕麦生产性能和土壤养分的影响. 中国草地学报, 2025, 47(1): 54-64. | |
| [38] | Guo N, Liu J, Wang Y L, et al. Effects of reseeding rates and fertilization levels on nutritional quality and yield of forage in a degraded grassland. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2025, 47(2): 70-79. |
| 郭楠, 刘建, 王云玲, 等. 不同补播量和施肥量对退化草地牧草营养品质和产量的影响. 中国草地学报, 2025, 47(2): 70-79. | |
| [39] | Homulle Z, George T S, Karley A J. Root traits with team benefits: understanding belowground interactions in intercropping systems. Plant and Soil, 2022, 471(112): 1-26. |
| [1] | Wen-hui DENG, Xiao-na ZHAO, Jia-yi YONG, Si-yu GUAN, Guo-qiang HU, Teng-fei WANG, Hai-ying HU. Effects of intercropping oat with different densities on alfalfa seed yield and its constituent factors [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 100-111. |
| [2] | Meng-qi LI, Quan-min DONG, Cai-cai SUN, Wei-dong LYU, Wei XU, Yu-zhen LIU, Wen-ting LIU, Xiao-xia YANG. Effects of summer decomposition of yak and Xizang sheep dung on soil nutrients in the Peri-Qinghai Lake Region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 42-53. |
| [3] | Yi-bo WANG, Xue-hua MING, Jian-yong ZHANG, Qi YUAN, Jian-ming DU, Bin WANG, Teng-fei WANG, Yi-yin ZHANG, Jian LAN, Le MU. Multi-trait evaluation of the production performance and seed yield of new oat germplasm materials in the arid area of Ningxia [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(4): 86-99. |
| [4] | Hao-bin JIA, Hao-yun JIANG, Ai-hua LI, Hai-bo WANG, Sun-quan LIN, Yue PAN, Jun-hong HUO, Jin-shun ZHAN. Effects of diets with different concentrate-to-roughage ratios on the growth rate, serum biochemical indexes, and rumen fermentation of Guangfeng goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(3): 170-184. |
| [5] | Shi-chao ZHANG, Guo-wen CUI, De-peng ZHANG, Fu-ying HAN, Ding DING, Xiang-li LYU, Shuo LIN, Le-ran CHEN, Ji-ru LI, Hua CAI. Establishment of a tissue culture-free genetic transformation system for alfalfa and its applications in salt-tolerance gene functional characterization and gene editing [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(3): 223-234. |
| [6] | Li-juan CHEN, Rong GAO, Jian-xi WANG, Hui-ling MA. A comparative study of differences in condensed tannin synthesis between Medicago sativa and Onobrychis viciifolia at different growth stages [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(2): 221-236. |
| [7] | Dong-ya LIU, Yan YANG, Jing LIU, Bo WANG, Zhi-gang LI. Effects of short-term sheep manure return on soil quality of desert steppe [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(2): 28-39. |
| [8] | Yang-kun LI, Zhuan-lin BEN, Jun-yu ZHANG, Hui-min YANG. A meta-analysis on the effect of fertilizer type on alfalfa seed yield under various climate and soil conditions [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(2): 54-67. |
| [9] | Ying ZHANG, Shan-mu HE, Ao-lei HE, Chang-ning LI, Tuo YAO. Effects of microbial inoculants combined with organic calcium protein on alfalfa growth and soil enzyme activity [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(1): 25-39. |
| [10] | Yi-yin ZHANG, Ai-ping XIAO, Bin WANG, Teng-fei WANG, Hai-ying HU, Jian LAN. Effect of nitrogen application on grass productivity and energy use efficiency in a mixed forage sorghum/lablab planting [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2026, 35(1): 40-52. |
| [11] | Chun-yan REN, Zhi-yun HAO, Rui BING, Ying-dong HUO, Hai-bi ZHAO, Peng-fei YIN, De-fu TANG, Shu-qin LIN, Ji-qing WANG. Effects of adding cellulase to the starter diet on the production performance, organ development, fatty acid composition, and serum antioxidant indices of Hu lambs [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(7): 120-131. |
| [12] | Ling-fei XIANG, Feng-ju ZHANG, Dong-mei MA, Jin-long LIU, Jian LAN, Jian-qiang DENG, Hai-ying HU, Bin WANG, Chun-jiang CAI, Qiao-li MA. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium rationing on production performance and nutritional quality of Echinochloa frumentacea in saline soil [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(7): 185-195. |
| [13] | Can CUI, Meng-qi WANG, Wan-lu ZHAO, Xin-ying LIU, Jing-jing JIAN, Jun-xin YAN. The effect on seed germination and seedling growth of soaking seeds with diethyl aminoethyl hexanoate in alfalfa under NaCl stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(6): 46-58. |
| [14] | Xin-yue ZHOU, Li-ping WANG, Qing-xue JIANG, Xiao-ran MA, Deng-xia YI, Xue-min WANG. Isolation of the low-temperature induced proteinMsLTI65 from alfalfa and its response to different stresses [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(5): 89-104. |
| [15] | Tian-rong LUO, Jian-zhi MA, Ming-yang DU, Jie-cuo DUO, Hui-yan XIONG, Rui-jun DUAN. Identification and expression analysis of LACS gene family members in Medicago sativa [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(4): 124-136. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||