Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2021, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (8): 127-136.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2020542
Chuan-qi WANG1(), Wen-hui LIU1, Yong-chao ZHANG1, Qing-ping ZHOU1,2()
Received:
2020-12-08
Revised:
2020-01-18
Online:
2021-07-09
Published:
2021-07-09
Contact:
Qing-ping ZHOU
Chuan-qi WANG, Wen-hui LIU, Yong-chao ZHANG, Qing-ping ZHOU. Studies on drought tolerance of wild Elymus sibiricus at the seedling stage[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(8): 127-136.
材料 Material | 来源 Source | 地理坐标 Geographical coordinates | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 生境 Habitat |
---|---|---|---|---|
14-001 | 红原县江茸乡Jiangrong Town, Hongyuan County | 32°39′57″ N;102°22′13″ E | 3543 | 高寒草甸Alpine meadow |
14-021 | 松潘县云囤村Yuntun Village, Songpan County | 32°34′05″ N;103°49′28″ E | 2788 | 高寒草甸Alpine meadow |
14-065 | 红原县Hongyuan County | 32°26′05″ N;107°35′40″ E | 3852 | 路边Roadside |
14-115 | 松潘县Songpan County | 32°34′30″ N;103°49′28″ E | 2788 | 路边Roadside |
14-165 | 松潘县牟尼沟Munigou, Songpan County | 32°54′02″ N;103°45′57″ E | 3173 | 路边Roadside |
14-189 | 松潘县黄龙乡Huanglong Town, Songpan County | 32°58′32″ N;104°03′06″ E | 2867 | 灌丛Bushwood |
14-235 | 松潘县川主寺镇Chuanzhusi Town, Songpan County | 33°00′25″ N;103°39′35″ E | 3133 | 路边Roadside |
14-251 | 若尔盖县Ruoergai County | 34°18′43″ N;102°59′35″ E | 3139 | 灌丛草场Bushwood grassland |
Table 1 Material number and source status of wild E. sibiricus
材料 Material | 来源 Source | 地理坐标 Geographical coordinates | 海拔 Altitude (m) | 生境 Habitat |
---|---|---|---|---|
14-001 | 红原县江茸乡Jiangrong Town, Hongyuan County | 32°39′57″ N;102°22′13″ E | 3543 | 高寒草甸Alpine meadow |
14-021 | 松潘县云囤村Yuntun Village, Songpan County | 32°34′05″ N;103°49′28″ E | 2788 | 高寒草甸Alpine meadow |
14-065 | 红原县Hongyuan County | 32°26′05″ N;107°35′40″ E | 3852 | 路边Roadside |
14-115 | 松潘县Songpan County | 32°34′30″ N;103°49′28″ E | 2788 | 路边Roadside |
14-165 | 松潘县牟尼沟Munigou, Songpan County | 32°54′02″ N;103°45′57″ E | 3173 | 路边Roadside |
14-189 | 松潘县黄龙乡Huanglong Town, Songpan County | 32°58′32″ N;104°03′06″ E | 2867 | 灌丛Bushwood |
14-235 | 松潘县川主寺镇Chuanzhusi Town, Songpan County | 33°00′25″ N;103°39′35″ E | 3133 | 路边Roadside |
14-251 | 若尔盖县Ruoergai County | 34°18′43″ N;102°59′35″ E | 3139 | 灌丛草场Bushwood grassland |
材料 Material | 株高Plant height (cm) | 相对生长速率 Relative growth rate (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | ||
14-001CK | 19.94±2.71a | 21.97±2.32a | 25.03±2.19a | 27.00±3.65a | 27.87±2.83a | 95.21±1.72A |
14-001 | 19.94±2.71a | 24.07±3.23a | 25.20±3.16a | 27.30±3.67a | 27.50±4.03a | |
14-021CK | 21.36±3.12a | 22.57±2.67a | 23.83±2.73a | 24.37±3.35a | 25.40±4.26a | 72.77±2.93AB |
14-021 | 21.36±3.12a | 21.90±2.28a | 22.30±2.09a | 23.67±2.61a | 24.30±2.31a | |
14-065CK | 22.54±3.27b | 29.93±4.72ab | 32.57±4.69ab | 35.17±5.01a | 37.00±6.33a | 76.69±3.27AB |
14-065 | 22.54±3.27a | 26.20±3.51a | 29.33±4.29a | 32.68±3.64a | 33.63±4.36a | |
14-115CK | 22.74±3.45a | 25.70±3.43a | 29.33±4.56a | 31.93±5.02a | 33.07±5.16a | 76.98±3.35AB |
14-115 | 22.74±3.45a | 25.47±2.99a | 28.53±3.17a | 29.73±3.69a | 30.70±4.08a | |
14-165CK | 18.06±2.57b | 23.37±4.03ab | 25.67±3.97ab | 27.03±4.62ab | 28.70±3.82a | 84.68±1.52AB |
14-165 | 18.06±2.57a | 22.97±3.25a | 24.83±3.44a | 26.24±4.27a | 27.07±4.30a | |
14-189CK | 25.12±3.54a | 28.37±4.05a | 32.07±4.26a | 34.33±3.92a | 35.73±4.57a | 56.59±3.26B |
14-189 | 25.12±3.54a | 27.90±3.67a | 29.73±3.82a | 30.77±4.15a | 31.13±4.09a | |
14-235CK | 23.68±4.23a | 24.30±3.26a | 26.50±3.37a | 28.37±2.84a | 30.20±3.07a | 94.33±2.02A |
14-235 | 23.68±4.23a | 23.73±3.57a | 26.44±3.73a | 29.05±3.59a | 29.83±3.61a | |
14-251CK | 21.08±3.74a | 23.85±2.96a | 24.15±3.17a | 24.67±3.24a | 25.27±2.98a | 98.81±1.05A |
14-251 | 21.08±3.74a | 23.00±3.04a | 24.63±3.28a | 24.87±3.39a | 25.23±3.76a |
Table 2 Effects of drought stress on plant height growth of E. sibiricus
材料 Material | 株高Plant height (cm) | 相对生长速率 Relative growth rate (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | ||
14-001CK | 19.94±2.71a | 21.97±2.32a | 25.03±2.19a | 27.00±3.65a | 27.87±2.83a | 95.21±1.72A |
14-001 | 19.94±2.71a | 24.07±3.23a | 25.20±3.16a | 27.30±3.67a | 27.50±4.03a | |
14-021CK | 21.36±3.12a | 22.57±2.67a | 23.83±2.73a | 24.37±3.35a | 25.40±4.26a | 72.77±2.93AB |
14-021 | 21.36±3.12a | 21.90±2.28a | 22.30±2.09a | 23.67±2.61a | 24.30±2.31a | |
14-065CK | 22.54±3.27b | 29.93±4.72ab | 32.57±4.69ab | 35.17±5.01a | 37.00±6.33a | 76.69±3.27AB |
14-065 | 22.54±3.27a | 26.20±3.51a | 29.33±4.29a | 32.68±3.64a | 33.63±4.36a | |
14-115CK | 22.74±3.45a | 25.70±3.43a | 29.33±4.56a | 31.93±5.02a | 33.07±5.16a | 76.98±3.35AB |
14-115 | 22.74±3.45a | 25.47±2.99a | 28.53±3.17a | 29.73±3.69a | 30.70±4.08a | |
14-165CK | 18.06±2.57b | 23.37±4.03ab | 25.67±3.97ab | 27.03±4.62ab | 28.70±3.82a | 84.68±1.52AB |
14-165 | 18.06±2.57a | 22.97±3.25a | 24.83±3.44a | 26.24±4.27a | 27.07±4.30a | |
14-189CK | 25.12±3.54a | 28.37±4.05a | 32.07±4.26a | 34.33±3.92a | 35.73±4.57a | 56.59±3.26B |
14-189 | 25.12±3.54a | 27.90±3.67a | 29.73±3.82a | 30.77±4.15a | 31.13±4.09a | |
14-235CK | 23.68±4.23a | 24.30±3.26a | 26.50±3.37a | 28.37±2.84a | 30.20±3.07a | 94.33±2.02A |
14-235 | 23.68±4.23a | 23.73±3.57a | 26.44±3.73a | 29.05±3.59a | 29.83±3.61a | |
14-251CK | 21.08±3.74a | 23.85±2.96a | 24.15±3.17a | 24.67±3.24a | 25.27±2.98a | 98.81±1.05A |
14-251 | 21.08±3.74a | 23.00±3.04a | 24.63±3.28a | 24.87±3.39a | 25.23±3.76a |
材料 Material | 干旱胁迫天数 Drought stress days | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | |
14-001CK | 2.50±0.11Ac | 5.57±0.36Ab | 7.11±0.37Ab | 8.28±0.38Aab | 9.31±0.47Aa |
14-001 | 2.50±0.11Ac | 4.67±0.40Ab | 6.13±0.24Aab | 7.57±0.35Aa | 8.49±0.39Aa |
14-021CK | 1.67±0.24Ac | 3.79±0.38Ab | 5.22±0.40Aab | 7.53±0.42Aa | 9.79±0.60Aa |
14-021 | 1.67±0.24Ac | 3.05±0.29Ab | 4.92±0.37Aa | 5.84±0.44Aa | 6.12±0.50Ba |
14-065CK | 2.54±0.19Ac | 4.57±0.37Ab | 6.67±0.63Aab | 8.23±0.46Aa | 9.87±0.55Aa |
14-065 | 2.54±0.19Ac | 3.88±0.34Ab | 5.77±0.27Aab | 6.57±0.38Aa | 7.65±0.47Aa |
14-115CK | 2.86±0.14Ac | 3.94±0.30Abc | 5.43±0.35Ab | 8.59±0.37Aa | 9.82±0.46Aa |
14-115 | 2.86±0.14Ab | 3.54±0.30Ab | 4.93±0.33Aab | 6.83±0.37Aa | 7.38±0.42Aa |
14-165CK | 2.44±0.28Ac | 5.09±0.38Ab | 6.99±0.40Ab | 9.08±0.47Aab | 11.44±0.64Aa |
14-165 | 2.44±0.28Ac | 4.37±0.29Ab | 6.16±0.37Ab | 8.56±0.40Aab | 9.98±0.56Aa |
14-189CK | 1.72±0.19Ac | 4.31±0.37Ab | 5.84±0.30Aab | 7.06±0.37Aa | 8.64±0.41Aa |
14-189 | 1.72±0.19Ab | 3.03±0.33Aab | 3.64±0.30Aab | 4.11±0.29Bab | 4.35±0.33Ba |
14-235CK | 1.59±0.24Ac | 3.00±0.23Ab | 5.91±0.35Aa | 6.98±0.44Aa | 8.59±0.43Aa |
14-235 | 1.59±0.24Ac | 2.91±0.25Ab | 4.66±0.41Aa | 5.72±0.39Aa | 6.45±0.38Aa |
14-251CK | 1.87±0.18Ac | 3.39±0.39Ab | 8.44±0.48Aab | 9.09±0.53Aa | 11.77±0.60Aa |
14-251 | 1.87±0.18Ac | 2.91±0.28Ab | 6.32±0.47Aab | 7.61±0.40Aa | 8.32±0.43Aa |
Table 3 Effects of drought stress on single leaf area of E. sibiricus (cm2)
材料 Material | 干旱胁迫天数 Drought stress days | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | |
14-001CK | 2.50±0.11Ac | 5.57±0.36Ab | 7.11±0.37Ab | 8.28±0.38Aab | 9.31±0.47Aa |
14-001 | 2.50±0.11Ac | 4.67±0.40Ab | 6.13±0.24Aab | 7.57±0.35Aa | 8.49±0.39Aa |
14-021CK | 1.67±0.24Ac | 3.79±0.38Ab | 5.22±0.40Aab | 7.53±0.42Aa | 9.79±0.60Aa |
14-021 | 1.67±0.24Ac | 3.05±0.29Ab | 4.92±0.37Aa | 5.84±0.44Aa | 6.12±0.50Ba |
14-065CK | 2.54±0.19Ac | 4.57±0.37Ab | 6.67±0.63Aab | 8.23±0.46Aa | 9.87±0.55Aa |
14-065 | 2.54±0.19Ac | 3.88±0.34Ab | 5.77±0.27Aab | 6.57±0.38Aa | 7.65±0.47Aa |
14-115CK | 2.86±0.14Ac | 3.94±0.30Abc | 5.43±0.35Ab | 8.59±0.37Aa | 9.82±0.46Aa |
14-115 | 2.86±0.14Ab | 3.54±0.30Ab | 4.93±0.33Aab | 6.83±0.37Aa | 7.38±0.42Aa |
14-165CK | 2.44±0.28Ac | 5.09±0.38Ab | 6.99±0.40Ab | 9.08±0.47Aab | 11.44±0.64Aa |
14-165 | 2.44±0.28Ac | 4.37±0.29Ab | 6.16±0.37Ab | 8.56±0.40Aab | 9.98±0.56Aa |
14-189CK | 1.72±0.19Ac | 4.31±0.37Ab | 5.84±0.30Aab | 7.06±0.37Aa | 8.64±0.41Aa |
14-189 | 1.72±0.19Ab | 3.03±0.33Aab | 3.64±0.30Aab | 4.11±0.29Bab | 4.35±0.33Ba |
14-235CK | 1.59±0.24Ac | 3.00±0.23Ab | 5.91±0.35Aa | 6.98±0.44Aa | 8.59±0.43Aa |
14-235 | 1.59±0.24Ac | 2.91±0.25Ab | 4.66±0.41Aa | 5.72±0.39Aa | 6.45±0.38Aa |
14-251CK | 1.87±0.18Ac | 3.39±0.39Ab | 8.44±0.48Aab | 9.09±0.53Aa | 11.77±0.60Aa |
14-251 | 1.87±0.18Ac | 2.91±0.28Ab | 6.32±0.47Aab | 7.61±0.40Aa | 8.32±0.43Aa |
材料 Material | 干旱胁迫天数Drought stress days | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | |
14-001CK | 0.0965b | 0.1086ab | 0.1278ab | 0.1561a | 0.1770a |
14-001 | 0.0965a | 0.1028a | 0.1276a | 0.1383a | 0.1431a |
14-021CK | 0.1086b | 0.1228ab | 0.1411ab | 0.1507ab | 0.1698a |
14-021 | 0.1086a | 0.1117a | 0.1336a | 0.1448a | 0.1525a |
14-065CK | 0.0889b | 0.0972ab | 0.1158ab | 0.1255ab | 0.1343a |
14-065 | 0.0889a | 0.0998a | 0.1102a | 0.1197a | 0.1226a |
14-115CK | 0.0605b | 0.0774ab | 0.0845ab | 0.0907ab | 0.0935a |
14-115 | 0.0605a | 0.0744a | 0.0801a | 0.0868a | 0.0900a |
14-165CK | 0.0622b | 0.0781ab | 0.0878ab | 0.0936a | 0.1067a |
14-165 | 0.0622a | 0.0746a | 0.0829a | 0.0838a | 0.0930a |
14-189CK | 0.0750a | 0.0836a | 0.0966a | 0.1009a | 0.1118a |
14-189 | 0.0750a | 0.0790a | 0.0850a | 0.0901a | 0.0924a |
14-235CK | 0.0787b | 0.0891ab | 0.1097ab | 0.1202a | 0.1259a |
14-235 | 0.0787a | 0.0839a | 0.1025a | 0.1156a | 0.1180a |
14-251CK | 0.0737b | 0.0908ab | 0.1051ab | 0.1109a | 0.1158a |
14-251 | 0.0737a | 0.0900a | 0.1028a | 0.1090a | 0.1105a |
Table 4 Effects of drought stress on the aboveground biomass of E. sibiricus (hay weight, g·5 plants-1)
材料 Material | 干旱胁迫天数Drought stress days | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | |
14-001CK | 0.0965b | 0.1086ab | 0.1278ab | 0.1561a | 0.1770a |
14-001 | 0.0965a | 0.1028a | 0.1276a | 0.1383a | 0.1431a |
14-021CK | 0.1086b | 0.1228ab | 0.1411ab | 0.1507ab | 0.1698a |
14-021 | 0.1086a | 0.1117a | 0.1336a | 0.1448a | 0.1525a |
14-065CK | 0.0889b | 0.0972ab | 0.1158ab | 0.1255ab | 0.1343a |
14-065 | 0.0889a | 0.0998a | 0.1102a | 0.1197a | 0.1226a |
14-115CK | 0.0605b | 0.0774ab | 0.0845ab | 0.0907ab | 0.0935a |
14-115 | 0.0605a | 0.0744a | 0.0801a | 0.0868a | 0.0900a |
14-165CK | 0.0622b | 0.0781ab | 0.0878ab | 0.0936a | 0.1067a |
14-165 | 0.0622a | 0.0746a | 0.0829a | 0.0838a | 0.0930a |
14-189CK | 0.0750a | 0.0836a | 0.0966a | 0.1009a | 0.1118a |
14-189 | 0.0750a | 0.0790a | 0.0850a | 0.0901a | 0.0924a |
14-235CK | 0.0787b | 0.0891ab | 0.1097ab | 0.1202a | 0.1259a |
14-235 | 0.0787a | 0.0839a | 0.1025a | 0.1156a | 0.1180a |
14-251CK | 0.0737b | 0.0908ab | 0.1051ab | 0.1109a | 0.1158a |
14-251 | 0.0737a | 0.0900a | 0.1028a | 0.1090a | 0.1105a |
材料 Material | 干旱胁迫天数Drought stress days | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | |
14-001CK | 0.0241a | 0.0246a | 0.0258a | 0.0263a | 0.0270a |
14-001 | 0.0241b | 0.0278ab | 0.0316ab | 0.0362a | 0.0395a |
14-021CK | 0.0217a | 0.0228a | 0.0233a | 0.0247a | 0.0278a |
14-021 | 0.0217a | 0.0245a | 0.0287a | 0.0310a | 0.0325a |
14-065CK | 0.0222a | 0.0226a | 0.0238a | 0.0246a | 0.0250a |
14-065 | 0.0222b | 0.0254ab | 0.0291ab | 0.0317ab | 0.0339a |
14-115CK | 0.0151a | 0.0155a | 0.0160a | 0.0164a | 0.0167a |
14-115 | 0.0151b | 0.0178ab | 0.0194ab | 0.0225ab | 0.0254a |
14-165CK | 0.0207a | 0.0210a | 0.0213a | 0.0217a | 0.0222a |
14-165 | 0.0207b | 0.0246ab | 0.0279ab | 0.0308ab | 0.0334a |
14-189CK | 0.0150a | 0.0152a | 0.0153a | 0.0155a | 0.0158a |
14-189 | 0.0150a | 0.0170a | 0.0199a | 0.0201a | 0.0224a |
14-235CK | 0.0262a | 0.0264ab | 0.0268a | 0.0273a | 0.0281a |
14-235 | 0.0262b | 0.0289ab | 0.0312ab | 0.0366ab | 0.0413a |
14-251CK | 0.0246a | 0.0248a | 0.0252a | 0.0253a | 0.0256a |
14-251 | 0.0246b | 0.0290ab | 0.0328ab | 0.0346ab | 0.0372a |
Table 5 Effects of drought stress on dry weight of root system of E. sibiricus (g·5 plants-1)
材料 Material | 干旱胁迫天数Drought stress days | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | |
14-001CK | 0.0241a | 0.0246a | 0.0258a | 0.0263a | 0.0270a |
14-001 | 0.0241b | 0.0278ab | 0.0316ab | 0.0362a | 0.0395a |
14-021CK | 0.0217a | 0.0228a | 0.0233a | 0.0247a | 0.0278a |
14-021 | 0.0217a | 0.0245a | 0.0287a | 0.0310a | 0.0325a |
14-065CK | 0.0222a | 0.0226a | 0.0238a | 0.0246a | 0.0250a |
14-065 | 0.0222b | 0.0254ab | 0.0291ab | 0.0317ab | 0.0339a |
14-115CK | 0.0151a | 0.0155a | 0.0160a | 0.0164a | 0.0167a |
14-115 | 0.0151b | 0.0178ab | 0.0194ab | 0.0225ab | 0.0254a |
14-165CK | 0.0207a | 0.0210a | 0.0213a | 0.0217a | 0.0222a |
14-165 | 0.0207b | 0.0246ab | 0.0279ab | 0.0308ab | 0.0334a |
14-189CK | 0.0150a | 0.0152a | 0.0153a | 0.0155a | 0.0158a |
14-189 | 0.0150a | 0.0170a | 0.0199a | 0.0201a | 0.0224a |
14-235CK | 0.0262a | 0.0264ab | 0.0268a | 0.0273a | 0.0281a |
14-235 | 0.0262b | 0.0289ab | 0.0312ab | 0.0366ab | 0.0413a |
14-251CK | 0.0246a | 0.0248a | 0.0252a | 0.0253a | 0.0256a |
14-251 | 0.0246b | 0.0290ab | 0.0328ab | 0.0346ab | 0.0372a |
材料 Material | 干旱胁迫天数Drought stress days | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 30 d | 40 d | 50 d | |
14-001 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 96.00±2.00Aa | 87.00±3.00Aa | 80.00±2.00Aa | 71.00±2.00Aa | 52.00±3.00Ab | 32.00±5.00Bc |
14-021 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 85.00±6.00Aa | 74.00±5.00Aa | 67.00±5.00Aa | 52.00±3.00Ab | 40.00±4.00Ab | 22.00±3.00Bc | 10.00±4.00Bc |
14-065 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 94.00±5.00Aa | 86.00±5.00Aa | 80.00±4.00Aa | 74.00±4.00Aa | 67.00±5.00Aa | 45.00±4.00Ab | 26.00±3.00Bc |
14-115 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 96.00±3.00Aa | 84.00±4.00Aa | 79.00±3.00Aa | 65.00±3.00Ab | 49.00±1.00Ab | 26.00±1.00Bc |
14-165 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 96.00±3.00Aa | 93.00±2.00Aa | 85.00±2.00Aa | 72.00±3.00Aa | 64.00±3.00Ab | 50.00±2.00Ab | 28.00±3.00Bc |
14-189 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 93.00±3.00Aa | 90.00±4.00Aa | 86.00±3.00Aa | 72.00±2.00Aa | 56.00±2.00Ab | 41.00±4.00Ab | 25.00±3.00Bc |
14-235 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 94.00±3.00Aa | 89.00±5.00Aa | 83.00±4.00Aa | 76.00±3.00Aa | 68.00±3.00Aa | 49.00±2.00Ab | 27.00±1.00Bc |
14-251 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 97.00±2.00Aa | 92.00±1.00Aa | 86.00±3.00Aa | 75.00±4.00Aa | 69.00±3.00Aa | 48.00±2.00Ab | 27.00±1.00Bc |
Table 6 Effects of drought stress on relative survival percentage of E. sibiricus (%)
材料 Material | 干旱胁迫天数Drought stress days | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 d | 5 d | 10 d | 15 d | 20 d | 30 d | 40 d | 50 d | |
14-001 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 96.00±2.00Aa | 87.00±3.00Aa | 80.00±2.00Aa | 71.00±2.00Aa | 52.00±3.00Ab | 32.00±5.00Bc |
14-021 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 85.00±6.00Aa | 74.00±5.00Aa | 67.00±5.00Aa | 52.00±3.00Ab | 40.00±4.00Ab | 22.00±3.00Bc | 10.00±4.00Bc |
14-065 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 94.00±5.00Aa | 86.00±5.00Aa | 80.00±4.00Aa | 74.00±4.00Aa | 67.00±5.00Aa | 45.00±4.00Ab | 26.00±3.00Bc |
14-115 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 100.00±0.00Aa | 96.00±3.00Aa | 84.00±4.00Aa | 79.00±3.00Aa | 65.00±3.00Ab | 49.00±1.00Ab | 26.00±1.00Bc |
14-165 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 96.00±3.00Aa | 93.00±2.00Aa | 85.00±2.00Aa | 72.00±3.00Aa | 64.00±3.00Ab | 50.00±2.00Ab | 28.00±3.00Bc |
14-189 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 93.00±3.00Aa | 90.00±4.00Aa | 86.00±3.00Aa | 72.00±2.00Aa | 56.00±2.00Ab | 41.00±4.00Ab | 25.00±3.00Bc |
14-235 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 94.00±3.00Aa | 89.00±5.00Aa | 83.00±4.00Aa | 76.00±3.00Aa | 68.00±3.00Aa | 49.00±2.00Ab | 27.00±1.00Bc |
14-251 | 100.00±0.00Aa | 97.00±2.00Aa | 92.00±1.00Aa | 86.00±3.00Aa | 75.00±4.00Aa | 69.00±3.00Aa | 48.00±2.00Ab | 27.00±1.00Bc |
材料 Material | 叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content (mg·L-1) | 相对电导率Relative conductivity (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
10 d | 20 d | 10 d | 20 d | |
14-001CK | 5.67±0.48Aa | 6.25±0.53Aa | 39.44±4.83Aa | 38.62±4.11Aa |
14-001 | 4.33±0.29Aa | 4.05±0.36Ba | 40.32±3.96Aa | 47.82±5.07Aa |
14-021CK | 5.62±0.46Aa | 5.83±0.51Aa | 40.79±4.63Aa | 38.16±3.86Ba |
14-021 | 3.47±0.17Ba | 2.28±0.11Ba | 54.89±5.58Aa | 66.70±6.25Aa |
14-065CK | 5.23±0.55Aa | 5.45±0.60Aa | 39.60±2.58Aa | 38.18±3.39Aa |
14-065 | 3.61±0.41Aa | 2.97±0.32Ba | 47.46±4.37Aa | 56.45±5.99Aa |
14-115CK | 5.66±0.55Aa | 6.51±0.64Aa | 45.39±3.73Aa | 43.90±3.90Aa |
14-115 | 3.52±0.43Ba | 3.03±0.40Ba | 49.53±5.16Aa | 57.37±6.08Aa |
14-165CK | 5.48±0.56Aa | 5.59±0.62Aa | 38.29±4.37Aa | 35.90±2.49Aa |
14-165 | 3.68±0.37Aa | 3.48±0.31Ba | 43.23±5.13Aa | 51.97±5.54Aa |
14-189CK | 5.58±0.56Aa | 5.74±0.69Aa | 39.32±3.77Aa | 37.90±3.82Ba |
14-189 | 3.36±0.49Ba | 2.65±0.42Ba | 52.82±4.63Aa | 63.79±5.38Aa |
14-235CK | 6.37±0.52Aa | 6.65±0.67Aa | 48.13±4.66Aa | 45.29±3.92Aa |
14-235 | 4.57±0.44Aa | 3.09±0.16Ba | 54.44±4.35Aa | 64.57±5.06Aa |
14-251CK | 5.33±0.58Aa | 5.77±0.65Aa | 37.93±2.61Aa | 35.08±2.74Aa |
14-251 | 3.69±0.42Aa | 3.20±0.34Ba | 45.32±3.06Aa | 52.01±4.15Aa |
Table 7 Effect of drought stress on physiological indexes of E. sibiricus
材料 Material | 叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content (mg·L-1) | 相对电导率Relative conductivity (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
10 d | 20 d | 10 d | 20 d | |
14-001CK | 5.67±0.48Aa | 6.25±0.53Aa | 39.44±4.83Aa | 38.62±4.11Aa |
14-001 | 4.33±0.29Aa | 4.05±0.36Ba | 40.32±3.96Aa | 47.82±5.07Aa |
14-021CK | 5.62±0.46Aa | 5.83±0.51Aa | 40.79±4.63Aa | 38.16±3.86Ba |
14-021 | 3.47±0.17Ba | 2.28±0.11Ba | 54.89±5.58Aa | 66.70±6.25Aa |
14-065CK | 5.23±0.55Aa | 5.45±0.60Aa | 39.60±2.58Aa | 38.18±3.39Aa |
14-065 | 3.61±0.41Aa | 2.97±0.32Ba | 47.46±4.37Aa | 56.45±5.99Aa |
14-115CK | 5.66±0.55Aa | 6.51±0.64Aa | 45.39±3.73Aa | 43.90±3.90Aa |
14-115 | 3.52±0.43Ba | 3.03±0.40Ba | 49.53±5.16Aa | 57.37±6.08Aa |
14-165CK | 5.48±0.56Aa | 5.59±0.62Aa | 38.29±4.37Aa | 35.90±2.49Aa |
14-165 | 3.68±0.37Aa | 3.48±0.31Ba | 43.23±5.13Aa | 51.97±5.54Aa |
14-189CK | 5.58±0.56Aa | 5.74±0.69Aa | 39.32±3.77Aa | 37.90±3.82Ba |
14-189 | 3.36±0.49Ba | 2.65±0.42Ba | 52.82±4.63Aa | 63.79±5.38Aa |
14-235CK | 6.37±0.52Aa | 6.65±0.67Aa | 48.13±4.66Aa | 45.29±3.92Aa |
14-235 | 4.57±0.44Aa | 3.09±0.16Ba | 54.44±4.35Aa | 64.57±5.06Aa |
14-251CK | 5.33±0.58Aa | 5.77±0.65Aa | 37.93±2.61Aa | 35.08±2.74Aa |
14-251 | 3.69±0.42Aa | 3.20±0.34Ba | 45.32±3.06Aa | 52.01±4.15Aa |
材料 Material | 测定指标Determination indexes | SD | 排序 Ranking | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH | LA | RSP | 生物量Biomass | 叶绿素Chlorophyll | REC | |||
14-001 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.6283 | 1 |
14-021 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.4250 | 8 |
14-065 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.5267 | 4 |
14-115 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.5200 | 6 |
14-165 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.6133 | 2 |
14-189 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.5117 | 7 |
14-235 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.5850 | 3 |
14-251 | 0.61 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.5216 | 5 |
Table 8 Subordinate function value and ranking of E. sibiricus under drought stress at seedling stage
材料 Material | 测定指标Determination indexes | SD | 排序 Ranking | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PH | LA | RSP | 生物量Biomass | 叶绿素Chlorophyll | REC | |||
14-001 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.6283 | 1 |
14-021 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.4250 | 8 |
14-065 | 0.62 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.5267 | 4 |
14-115 | 0.64 | 0.55 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.5200 | 6 |
14-165 | 0.59 | 0.65 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 0.6133 | 2 |
14-189 | 0.35 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.52 | 0.5117 | 7 |
14-235 | 0.68 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.56 | 0.60 | 0.51 | 0.5850 | 3 |
14-251 | 0.61 | 0.52 | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.48 | 0.50 | 0.5216 | 5 |
1 | Yao K, Zhang C J, He L, et al. Evaluation of ecological environment vulnerability in the Northwest Plateau area of Sichuan. Research of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 27(4): 349-355, 362. |
姚昆, 张存杰, 何磊, 等. 川西北高原区生态环境脆弱性评价. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(4): 349-355, 362. | |
2 | Deng D Z, Wang Z T, Meng J W, et al. An analysis of causes of land desertification in Northwestern Sichuan its preventive strategies. Journal of Sichuan Forestry Science and Technology, 2010, 31(3): 83-88. |
邓东周, 王朱涛, 蒙嘉文, 等. 川西北地区土地沙化成因探讨及对策建议. 四川林业科技, 2010, 31(3): 83-88. | |
3 | Yu D S. Dilemma and countermeasures of ecological construction in Northwest Sichuan Plateau. Journal of Chengdu Textile College, 2012, 29(1): 4-8. |
于代松. 川西北高原生态建设的困境与对策. 成都纺织高等专科学校学报, 2012, 29(1): 4-8. | |
4 | Wang F X, Xiao K Z, Jiang S F, et al. Mechanisms of reactive oxygen species in plants under drought stress. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2019, 64(17): 1765-1779. |
王福祥, 肖开转, 姜身飞, 等. 干旱胁迫下植物体内活性氧的作用机制. 科学通报, 2019, 64(17): 1765-1779. | |
5 | Caruso A, Chefdor F, Carpin S, et al. Physiological characterization and identification of genes differentially expressed in response to drought induced by PEG 6000 in Populus canadensis leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2008, 165(9): 932-941. |
6 | Xu X, Yang F, Xiao X W, et al. Sex-specific responses of Populus cathayana to drought and elevated temperatures. Plant Cell Environment, 2008, 31(6): 850-860. |
7 | Yan X F, Deng X J, Wang J, et al. Effects of seed size and drought stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of Quercus wutaishanica seedlings. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(10): 3331-3339. |
闫兴富, 邓晓娟, 王静, 等. 种子大小和干旱胁迫对辽东栎幼苗生长和生理特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10): 3331-3339. | |
8 | Nicotra A B, Atkin O K, Bonser S P, et al. Plant phenotypic plasticity in a changing climate. Trends in Plant Science, 2010, 15(12): 684-692. |
9 | Niu S Z, Song Q F, Fan W G, et al. Effects of drought stress on leaf physiological characteristics and root growth of the clone seedlings of wild tea plants. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(21): 7333-7341. |
牛素贞, 宋勤飞, 樊卫国, 等. 干旱胁迫对喀斯特地区野生茶树幼苗生理特性及根系生长的影响. 生态学报, 2017, 37(21): 7333-7341. | |
10 | Wang C Q, Zhang W J, Deji Z M, et al. Responses to water and salt stress on seed germination of Elymus nutans in Nagarzê County, Tibet. Seed, 2018, 37(7): 39-43. |
王传旗, 张文静, 德吉卓玛, 等. 西藏浪卡子县野生垂穗披碱草种子萌发对水盐胁迫的响应. 种子, 2018, 37(7): 39-43. | |
11 | Xie R J, Zhang X J, Liu J P, et al. Synergistic effects of shade and drought on the photosynthetic characteristics of Arthraxon hispidus. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(10): 64-76. |
谢瑞娟, 张小晶, 刘金平, 等. 遮阴和干旱对荩草光合特性影响的协同作用. 草业学报, 2017, 26(10): 64-76. | |
12 | Zhou J, Wang C Q, Baosai H N, et al. Physiological response to temperature and moisture of wild Elymus nutans Griseb. in Tibet, China. Seed, 2019, 38(8): 65-69. |
周晶, 王传旗, 包赛很那, 等. 西藏野生垂穗披碱草对温度和水分的生理响应. 种子, 2019, 38(8): 65-69. | |
13 | Ren L W, Liu M C, Wang X T, et al. Water stress at jointing and tasseling stage: Effect on growth and yield of springy maize. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(1): 17-22. |
任丽雯, 刘明春, 王兴涛, 等. 拔节和抽雄期水分胁迫对春玉米生长和产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(1): 17-22. | |
14 | Chen Y J, Zhou Q P, Sun J, et al. Comparative study on drought resistance of six native Elymus L. species seedlings. Journal of Southwest Minzu University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 42(6): 598-603. |
陈有军, 周青平, 孙建, 等. 六份乡土牧草苗期干旱胁迫的对比研究. 西南民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 42(6): 598-603. | |
15 | Wang C Q, Wang H M, Wei X X, et al. Research progress of Elymus sibiricus. Crops, 2020(6): 1-7. |
王传旗, 王红梅, 魏小星, 等. 老芒麦研究进展. 作物杂志, 2020(6): 1-7. | |
16 | Mcguire P E, Dvrák J. High salt tolerance potential in wheatgrasses. Crop Science, 1981, 21(5): 702-705. |
17 | Xiao B, Wu J Y, Wang Q H, et al. Effects of four gramineous pasture grasses on soil physicochemical properties in wasteland at the buffer zone of Guanting Reservoir. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(5): 113-121. |
肖波, 武菊英, 王庆海, 等. 四种禾本科牧草对官厅水库库滨荒地的培肥效应研究. 草业学报, 2010, 19(5): 113-121. | |
18 | Li J, Fan J, Zhu Z M. Effects of activated water irrigation on growth characteristics of soybeanunder drought stress. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(11): 3711-3718. |
李娟, 樊军, 朱志梅. 干旱胁迫下活化水灌溉对大豆生长特征的影响. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11): 3711-3718. | |
19 | Zhang W H, Liu D L, Miao Y J, et al. Drought stress responses of the seedlings of three wild forages in Tibet. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(21): 7277-7285. |
张卫红, 刘大林, 苗彦军, 等. 西藏3种野生牧草苗期对干旱胁迫的响应. 生态学报, 2017, 37(21): 7277-7285. | |
20 | Su H, Liu Y P, Zhang J X, et al. The influence of Na2CO3 stress on forage growth at seedling stage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2005(1): 23-26. |
苏慧, 刘玉平, 张继星, 等. Na2CO3胁迫对牧草苗期生长的影响. 中国草地, 2005(1): 23-26. | |
21 | Yang H, Qi J, Li Y Y, et al. Effects of different ratio of exogenous hormones and phosphate on the growth and nutritional quality of Elymus sibiricus L.. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 1015-1023. |
杨航, 祁娟, 李玉英, 等. 外源激素与磷素配施对老芒麦生长特性及营养品质的影响. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1015-1023. | |
22 | Xu D Q. Several problems in measurement and application of chlorophyll content. Plant Physiology Communications, 2009, 45(9): 896-898. |
许大全. 叶绿素含量的测定及其应用中的几个问题. 植物生理学通讯, 2009, 45(9): 896-898. | |
23 | Song L L, Ding W, Zhao M G, et al. Nitric oxide protects against oxidative stress under heat stress in the calluses from two ecotypes of reed. Plant Science, 2006, 171(4): 449-458. |
24 | Qi J, Xu Z, Wang H Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the drought resistance of Elymus dahuricus Turcz. and Elymus sibiricus L. at seedling stage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2009, 17(1): 37-42. |
祁娟, 徐柱, 王海清, 等. 披碱草与老芒麦苗期抗旱性综合评价. 草地学报, 2009, 17(1): 37-42. | |
25 | Vadez V, Berger J D, Warkentin T, et al. Adaptation of grain legumes to climate change: A review. Agronomy for Sus-tainable Development, 2012, 32(1): 31-44. |
26 | Deng X X, Shi Z, Xiao W F, et al. Effects of drought and shading on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Pinus massoniana seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(8): 2735-2742. |
邓秀秀, 施征, 肖文发, 等. 干旱和遮荫对马尾松幼苗生长和光合特性的影响. 生态学报, 2020, 40(8): 2735-2742. | |
27 | Lipiec J, Doussan C, Nosalewicz A, et al. Effect of drought and heat stresses on plant growth and yield: A review. International Agrophysics, 2013, 27(4): 463-477. |
28 | Chen A P, Sui X Q, Wang Y X , et al. Effects of drought and re-watering on growth and physiological characteristics of Seriphidium transiliense seedlings. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1216-1225. |
陈爱萍, 隋晓青, 王玉祥, 等. 干旱胁迫及复水对伊犁绢蒿幼苗生长及生理特性的影响. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1216-1225. | |
29 | Yao X L, Zhou L, Feng M S, et al. Effects of drought stress on the growth and biomass of Phoebezhennan’ seedling in different substrates net container. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2018, 38(1): 81-90. |
姚小兰, 周琳, 冯茂松, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同基质网袋桢楠幼苗生长及生物量的影响. 植物研究, 2018, 38(1): 81-90. | |
30 | Chen C X, Xie X H, Wang Y P, et al. Effects of salt and drought on the physiological characteristics of Elaeagnus angustifolia L. seedlings. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 4540-4550. |
陈春晓, 谢秀华, 王宇鹏, 等. 盐分和干旱对沙枣幼苗生理特性的影响. 生态学报, 2019, 39(12): 4540-4550. | |
31 | Bai S Q, Yan J J, Zeng Y, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on drought-resistance of 9 native Elymus sibiricus germplasms resources. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science, 2013(2): 1-5, 9. |
白史且, 鄢家俊, 曾怡, 等. 9份野生老芒麦种质资源抗旱性综合评价. 草业与畜牧, 2013(2): 1-5, 9. | |
32 | Wang C Q, Liang S, Zhang W J, et al. Effect of temperature and water on seed germination of Leymus secalinus. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(6): 1459-1464. |
王传旗, 梁莎, 张文静, 等. 温度和水分对赖草种子萌发的影响. 草业科学, 2018, 35(6): 1459-1464. | |
33 | Li G Y, Fu J T, Yu D M, et al. Mechanical strength characteristics of herbaceous plant roots under alkali stressing. Journal of Engineering Geology, 2016, 24(4): 584-596. |
李光莹, 付江涛, 余冬梅, 等. 碱胁迫条件下草本植物根系力学强度试验研究. 工程地质学报, 2016, 24(4): 584-596. | |
34 | Anjum S A, Xie X Y, Wang L C, et al. Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2011(6): 2026-2032. |
35 | Wang C Q, Miao Y J, Wang J L, et al. Studies on drought resistance of wild Elymus nutans in Tibet under drought stress at seedling stage. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2017, 39(4): 116-120. |
王传旗, 苗彦军, 王建林, 等. 西藏野生垂穗披碱草苗期抗旱性研究. 中国草地学报, 2017, 39(4): 116-120. | |
36 | Tian L H, Zhou Q P, Lu S J, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of different species of Poa L. grass at seedling stage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(3): 561-566. |
田莉华, 周青平, 卢素锦, 等. 不同种类早熟禾苗期抗旱性综合评价. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 561-566. | |
37 | Wang N, Yuan M L, Chen H, et al. Effects of drought stress and rewatering on growth and physiological characteristics of invasive Aegilops tauschii seedlings. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(1): 70-78. |
王宁, 袁美丽, 陈浩, 等. 干旱胁迫及复水对入侵植物节节麦幼苗生长及生理特性的影响. 草业学报, 2019, 28(1): 70-78. | |
38 | Song J Z, Li P P, Fu W G. Effect of water stress and rewatering on the physiological and biochemical characteristics of Phalaris arundinacea. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(2): 62-69. |
宋家壮, 李萍萍, 付为国. 水分胁迫及复水对虉草生理生化特性的影响. 草业学报, 2012, 21(2): 62-69. | |
39 | Wang P, Wang P, Sun W B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of drought resistance of eight Elymus germplasms at seedling stage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 397-404. |
王平, 王沛, 孙万斌, 等. 8份披碱草属牧草苗期抗旱性综合评价. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 397-404. | |
40 | Qin Y, Druzhinina I S, Pan X Y, et al. Microbially mediated plant salt tolerance and microbiome-based solutions for saline agriculture. Biotechnology Advances, 2016, 34(7): 1245-1259. |
41 | Liu X H, Wang Z L, Wang M R, et al. Evaluation on drought-resistance of Stylosanthes guianensis and identification for drought resistance germplasms in seedling stage. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 956-967. |
刘小慧, 王重丽, 王梦茹, 等. 圭亚那柱花草苗期抗旱性评价及抗旱种质鉴定. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 956-967. | |
42 | Xu P P, Wang J Z. Drought resistance of three common slope plants determined in a simulated drought experiment. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2018, 27(2): 36-47. |
许翩翩, 王建柱. 三种常见边坡植物对模拟干旱环境抗旱性能的研究. 草业学报, 2018, 27(2): 36-47. | |
43 | Jin J Y, Zhang W H, Yuan L. Physiological responses of three forages to drought stress and evaluation of their drought resistance. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(10): 157-165. |
靳军英, 张卫华, 袁玲. 三种牧草对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性评价. 草业学报, 2015, 24(10): 157-165. |
[1] | Rui WU, Wen-hui LIU, Yong-chao ZHANG, Yan QIN, Xiao-xing WEI, Min-jie LIU. A study of the correlation between seed shattering and agronomic traits of Elymus sibiricus on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(4): 130-139. |
[2] | CHEN You-jun, DONG Quan-min, ZHOU Qing-ping. The impact of different soil moisture and sterilization treatments on root architecture and rhizosheath formation of Kengyilia hirsuta at the seedling stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(3): 60-69. |
[3] | JIANG Hong-yan, TENG Ke, TAN Peng-hui, YIN Shu-xia. Heterologous expression of a novel Zoysia japonica C2H2 zinc finger protein gene, ZjZFN1, caused drought sensitivity in Arabidopsis [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(4): 129-138. |
[4] | LIANG Kun-lun, JIA Cun-zhi, SUN Jin-hao, WANG Ming-yan, FU Hua, MAO Zhu-xin. Evaluation of physiological responses and tolerance to low-temperature stress of ten Elymus nutans varieties [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(3): 111-121. |
[5] | LI Zhou, PENG Yan, YIN Shu-xia, HAN Lie-bao. Effects of exogenous mannose application on drought tolerance, sugars, and sugar alcohol accumulation in white clover [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(12): 85-93. |
[6] | FAN Zhi-Xia, LI Shao-Cai, SUN Hai-Long. Physiological response of Amorpha fruiticosa to drought stress under paclobutrazol application and an evaluation of drought resistance [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2017, 26(3): 132-141. |
[7] | SHAN Bao-Qin, QU Meng-Meng, LI Jiao, LI Chao. Bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soil by plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in Northern Shaanx [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(7): 87-94. |
[8] | LI Hui-Fang, WANG Yu, YUAN Qing-Hua, ZHAO Gui-Qin. Effects of lead stress on growth, physiology, and lead ion accumulation and transportation in gramineous forages [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(9): 163-172. |
[9] | ZHOU Xiang-rui,YUE Li-jun,WANG Suo-min. Sodium compound fertilizer improved growth and drought tolerance of Zygophyllum xanthoxylum seedlings under drought stress [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(6): 142-147. |
[10] | GUO Yu-pin,MI Fu-gui,YAN Li-jun,REN Yong-xia,LV Shi-jie,FU Bing-zhe. Physiological response to drought stresses and drought resistances evaluation of different Kentucky bluegrass varieties [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 220-228. |
[11] | LI Qiang,LUO Yan-hong,LONG Wen-jing,KONG Fan-lei,YANG Shi-min,YUAN Ji-chao. Effect of low nitrogen stress on different low nitrogen tolerance maize cultivars seedling stage growth and physiological characteristics [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2014, 23(4): 204-212. |
[12] | Drought tolerance analysis of Miscanthus sinensis ‘Gracillimu’ seedlingsCHEN Min, HOU Xin-cun, FAN Xi-feng, WU Ju-ying, PAN Yuan-zhi. Drought tolerance analysis of Miscanthus sinensis ‘Gracillimu’ seedlings [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(3): 184-. |
[13] | LIU Jin-ping, YOU Ming-hong. Effect of growth inhibitors on biomass structure, energy distribution and lodging rates for populations of Elymus sibiricus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(5): 195-203. |
[14] |
LIU Jin-ping, YOU Ming-hong, BAI Shi-qie.
Effect of row space on population component composition, biomass structure and energy distribution of Elymus sibiricus [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(3): 69-74. |
[15] | LIU Jian-ning, SHI Yong-hong, HOU Zhi-hong, WANG Yun-qi, LI peng, XING Ya-liang, WU Xin-ming, ZHANG Yan. Drought resistance evaluation of four seedling chicory [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2012, 21(2): 241-248. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||