Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 61-74.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2022004
Previous Articles Next Articles
Li-fang CHANG(), Xin LI, Hui-juan GUO, Lin-yi QIAO, Shu-wei ZHANG, Fang CHEN, Zhi-jian CHANG(), Xiao-jun ZHANG()
Received:
2022-01-06
Revised:
2022-04-11
Online:
2022-11-20
Published:
2022-10-01
Contact:
Zhi-jian CHANG,Xiao-jun ZHANG
Li-fang CHANG, Xin LI, Hui-juan GUO, Lin-yi QIAO, Shu-wei ZHANG, Fang CHEN, Zhi-jian CHANG, Xiao-jun ZHANG. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of octoploid Tritipyrum-derived wheat breeding lines based on agronomic traits[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 61-74.
性状 Trait | 频率分布 Frequency | 多样性指数 Diversity index (H') | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||
株型 Plant type | 0.3313 | 0.5153 | 0.1534 | 1.00 |
芒形 Awn type | 0.7791 | 0.0736 | 0.1472 | 0.67 |
穗形Spike shape | 0.5583 | 0.4417 | 0 | 0.69 |
粒色 Grain color | 0.8098 | 0.1902 | 0 | 0.49 |
粒质 Grain texture | 0.9264 | 0.0736 | 0 | 0.26 |
Table 1 Genetic diversity of quality traits of 163 octoploid Tritipyrum-derived lines
性状 Trait | 频率分布 Frequency | 多样性指数 Diversity index (H') | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||
株型 Plant type | 0.3313 | 0.5153 | 0.1534 | 1.00 |
芒形 Awn type | 0.7791 | 0.0736 | 0.1472 | 0.67 |
穗形Spike shape | 0.5583 | 0.4417 | 0 | 0.69 |
粒色 Grain color | 0.8098 | 0.1902 | 0 | 0.49 |
粒质 Grain texture | 0.9264 | 0.0736 | 0 | 0.26 |
性状 Traits | 年份 Year | 平均值 Mean | 变幅 Range | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of variance (%) | F值 F-value | 多样性指数 Diversity index (H') |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 PH (cm) | 2021 | 77.01 | 46.25~111.25 | 10.09 | 13.10 | 67.95*** | 2.04 |
2020 | 76.07 | 43.50~109.63 | 10.72 | 14.09 | |||
均值 Mean | 76.53 | 44.88~110.44 | 10.16 | 13.28 | |||
穗长 SL (cm) | 2021 | 7.83 | 4.00~11.38 | 1.21 | 15.46 | 45.15*** | 2.05 |
2020 | 7.74 | 3.94~11.25 | 1.18 | 15.25 | |||
均值Mean | 7.79 | 3.97~11.25 | 1.18 | 15.15 | |||
有效分蘖数 ETN (No.) | 2021 | 6.51 | 3.57~13.63 | 1.34 | 20.58 | 5.48*** | 2.04 |
2020 | 5.96 | 3.50~10.38 | 1.23 | 20.64 | |||
均值Mean | 6.23 | 4.04~10.65 | 1.08 | 17.34 | |||
每穗小穗数 SNS (No.) | 2021 | 19.40 | 15.71~22.25 | 1.14 | 5.88 | 10.72*** | 2.07 |
2020 | 19.57 | 16.13~23.13 | 1.29 | 6.59 | |||
均值Mean | 19.49 | 16.94~22.38 | 1.10 | 5.64 | |||
穗粒数 GNS (No.) | 2021 | 47.03 | 28.50~69.75 | 6.19 | 13.16 | 14.04*** | 2.02 |
2020 | 47.68 | 27.60~69.25 | 6.56 | 13.76 | |||
均值Mean | 47.39 | 29.05~66.75 | 5.39 | 11.37 | |||
千粒重 TKW (g) | 2021 | 34.14 | 18.20~51.30 | 7.01 | 20.53 | 15.15*** | 2.09 |
2020 | 37.10 | 22.60~53.70 | 6.21 | 16.74 | |||
均值Mean | 35.62 | 20.60~51.80 | 6.10 | 17.13 | |||
单株产量 YP (g) | 2021 | 6.99 | 2.30~13.42 | 1.89 | 27.04 | 4.02*** | 2.04 |
2020 | 7.93 | 4.12~13.48 | 2.02 | 25.47 | |||
均值Mean | 7.46 | 4.07~11.39 | 1.50 | 20.11 | |||
抽穗期 HD (d) | 2021 | 75.16 | 69.00~86.00 | 3.46 | 4.60 | - | 1.97 |
2020 | 77.96 | 71.00~88.00 | 3.37 | 4.32 | |||
均值Mean | 76.56 | 70.50~87.00 | 3.40 | 4.44 |
Table 2 Genetic diversity analysis of 8 yield-related traits in 163 octoploid Tritipyrum-derived lines
性状 Traits | 年份 Year | 平均值 Mean | 变幅 Range | 标准差 Standard deviation | 变异系数 Coefficient of variance (%) | F值 F-value | 多样性指数 Diversity index (H') |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 PH (cm) | 2021 | 77.01 | 46.25~111.25 | 10.09 | 13.10 | 67.95*** | 2.04 |
2020 | 76.07 | 43.50~109.63 | 10.72 | 14.09 | |||
均值 Mean | 76.53 | 44.88~110.44 | 10.16 | 13.28 | |||
穗长 SL (cm) | 2021 | 7.83 | 4.00~11.38 | 1.21 | 15.46 | 45.15*** | 2.05 |
2020 | 7.74 | 3.94~11.25 | 1.18 | 15.25 | |||
均值Mean | 7.79 | 3.97~11.25 | 1.18 | 15.15 | |||
有效分蘖数 ETN (No.) | 2021 | 6.51 | 3.57~13.63 | 1.34 | 20.58 | 5.48*** | 2.04 |
2020 | 5.96 | 3.50~10.38 | 1.23 | 20.64 | |||
均值Mean | 6.23 | 4.04~10.65 | 1.08 | 17.34 | |||
每穗小穗数 SNS (No.) | 2021 | 19.40 | 15.71~22.25 | 1.14 | 5.88 | 10.72*** | 2.07 |
2020 | 19.57 | 16.13~23.13 | 1.29 | 6.59 | |||
均值Mean | 19.49 | 16.94~22.38 | 1.10 | 5.64 | |||
穗粒数 GNS (No.) | 2021 | 47.03 | 28.50~69.75 | 6.19 | 13.16 | 14.04*** | 2.02 |
2020 | 47.68 | 27.60~69.25 | 6.56 | 13.76 | |||
均值Mean | 47.39 | 29.05~66.75 | 5.39 | 11.37 | |||
千粒重 TKW (g) | 2021 | 34.14 | 18.20~51.30 | 7.01 | 20.53 | 15.15*** | 2.09 |
2020 | 37.10 | 22.60~53.70 | 6.21 | 16.74 | |||
均值Mean | 35.62 | 20.60~51.80 | 6.10 | 17.13 | |||
单株产量 YP (g) | 2021 | 6.99 | 2.30~13.42 | 1.89 | 27.04 | 4.02*** | 2.04 |
2020 | 7.93 | 4.12~13.48 | 2.02 | 25.47 | |||
均值Mean | 7.46 | 4.07~11.39 | 1.50 | 20.11 | |||
抽穗期 HD (d) | 2021 | 75.16 | 69.00~86.00 | 3.46 | 4.60 | - | 1.97 |
2020 | 77.96 | 71.00~88.00 | 3.37 | 4.32 | |||
均值Mean | 76.56 | 70.50~87.00 | 3.40 | 4.44 |
性状Trait | 抽穗期HD | 株高PH | 穗长SL | 有效分蘖数ETN | 每穗小穗数 SNS | 穗粒数 GNS | 千粒重TKW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 PH | 0.2932*** | ||||||
穗长SL | -0.2306** | 0.1635* | |||||
有效分蘖数 ETN | 0.0837 | 0.1721* | -0.1042 | ||||
每穗小穗数SNS | 0.5005*** | 0.1199 | 0.0879 | 0.1795* | |||
穗粒数GNS | -0.0072 | 0.0464 | 0.3828*** | -0.2633*** | 0.1521 | ||
千粒重TKW | -0.5249*** | 0.2084*** | 0.2397** | -0.2177** | -0.4902*** | 0.1300 | |
单株产量YP | -0.2669*** | 0.1406 | 0.2403** | 0.4269*** | -0.0628 | 0.3386*** | 0.4668*** |
Table 3 Correlative coefficient of 8 yield-related traits of 163 octoploid Tritipyrum-derived lines
性状Trait | 抽穗期HD | 株高PH | 穗长SL | 有效分蘖数ETN | 每穗小穗数 SNS | 穗粒数 GNS | 千粒重TKW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
株高 PH | 0.2932*** | ||||||
穗长SL | -0.2306** | 0.1635* | |||||
有效分蘖数 ETN | 0.0837 | 0.1721* | -0.1042 | ||||
每穗小穗数SNS | 0.5005*** | 0.1199 | 0.0879 | 0.1795* | |||
穗粒数GNS | -0.0072 | 0.0464 | 0.3828*** | -0.2633*** | 0.1521 | ||
千粒重TKW | -0.5249*** | 0.2084*** | 0.2397** | -0.2177** | -0.4902*** | 0.1300 | |
单株产量YP | -0.2669*** | 0.1406 | 0.2403** | 0.4269*** | -0.0628 | 0.3386*** | 0.4668*** |
类群 Group | 个数 Number | 抽穗期 HD (d) | 株高 PH (cm) | 穗长 SL (cm) | 有效分蘖数 ETN (No.) | 每穗小穗数 SNS (No.) | 穗粒数 GNS (No.) | 千粒重 TKW (g) | 单株产量 YP (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 42 | 73.88b | 77.25b | 8.14ab | 6.42a | 19.30bc | 51.07a | 36.38b | 8.14a |
II | 18 | 74.11b | 75.18b | 7.47bc | 6.37a | 18.49d | 40.46d | 36.20b | 6.17bc |
III | 24 | 73.67b | 87.93a | 8.26a | 7.01a | 19.11c | 45.56bc | 42.13a | 8.19a |
IV | 29 | 79.03a | 86.97a | 7.68abc | 6.74a | 19.93ab | 46.45bc | 29.48d | 6.01bc |
V | 12 | 78.67a | 72.04c | 7.30c | 6.72a | 20.53a | 44.09c | 22.50e | 5.23c |
VI | 38 | 73.89b | 64.28d | 7.67abc | 6.14a | 19.34bc | 48.21ab | 32.90c | 6.72b |
Table 4 Performance of yield-related traits of six groups based on cluster analysis
类群 Group | 个数 Number | 抽穗期 HD (d) | 株高 PH (cm) | 穗长 SL (cm) | 有效分蘖数 ETN (No.) | 每穗小穗数 SNS (No.) | 穗粒数 GNS (No.) | 千粒重 TKW (g) | 单株产量 YP (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I | 42 | 73.88b | 77.25b | 8.14ab | 6.42a | 19.30bc | 51.07a | 36.38b | 8.14a |
II | 18 | 74.11b | 75.18b | 7.47bc | 6.37a | 18.49d | 40.46d | 36.20b | 6.17bc |
III | 24 | 73.67b | 87.93a | 8.26a | 7.01a | 19.11c | 45.56bc | 42.13a | 8.19a |
IV | 29 | 79.03a | 86.97a | 7.68abc | 6.74a | 19.93ab | 46.45bc | 29.48d | 6.01bc |
V | 12 | 78.67a | 72.04c | 7.30c | 6.72a | 20.53a | 44.09c | 22.50e | 5.23c |
VI | 38 | 73.89b | 64.28d | 7.67abc | 6.14a | 19.34bc | 48.21ab | 32.90c | 6.72b |
性状 Trait | 主成分 Principal components | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
抽穗期 HD | -0.4925 | 0.2781 | -0.0958 | 0.2745 |
株高 PH | 0.0162 | 0.4384 | 0.1382 | 0.7553 |
有效分蘖数 ETN | 0.3030 | 0.3511 | -0.3265 | -0.0720 |
穗长 SL | -0.1138 | 0.3076 | 0.6858 | -0.2670 |
每穗小穗数 SNS | -0.3752 | 0.4488 | -0.1725 | -0.2186 |
穗粒数 GNS | 0.2210 | 0.3814 | -0.4947 | -0.2226 |
千粒重 TKW | 0.5603 | -0.0253 | 0.0740 | 0.3297 |
单株产量 YP | 0.3858 | 0.4063 | 0.3389 | -0.2675 |
特征值 Eigen value | 2.3423 | 1.7192 | 1.4049 | 1.0230 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 29.28 | 21.49 | 17.56 | 12.79 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 29.28 | 50.77 | 68.33 | 81.12 |
Table 5 Principal components analysis based on 8 yield-related traits of 163 octoploid Tritipyrum-derived lines
性状 Trait | 主成分 Principal components | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
抽穗期 HD | -0.4925 | 0.2781 | -0.0958 | 0.2745 |
株高 PH | 0.0162 | 0.4384 | 0.1382 | 0.7553 |
有效分蘖数 ETN | 0.3030 | 0.3511 | -0.3265 | -0.0720 |
穗长 SL | -0.1138 | 0.3076 | 0.6858 | -0.2670 |
每穗小穗数 SNS | -0.3752 | 0.4488 | -0.1725 | -0.2186 |
穗粒数 GNS | 0.2210 | 0.3814 | -0.4947 | -0.2226 |
千粒重 TKW | 0.5603 | -0.0253 | 0.0740 | 0.3297 |
单株产量 YP | 0.3858 | 0.4063 | 0.3389 | -0.2675 |
特征值 Eigen value | 2.3423 | 1.7192 | 1.4049 | 1.0230 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 29.28 | 21.49 | 17.56 | 12.79 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 29.28 | 50.77 | 68.33 | 81.12 |
序号 No. | 品系 Line | 类群 Group | D值 D value | 位次 Ranking | 序号 No. | 品系 Line | 类群 Group | D值 D value | 位次 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CH0977 | Ⅰ | 0.5833 | 37 | 83 | CH16433 | Ⅲ | 0.6067 | 28 |
2 | CH16398 | Ⅰ | 0.5830 | 38 | 84 | CH16371 | Ⅲ | 0.6971 | 8 |
3 | CH16419 | Ⅰ | 0.5997 | 33 | 85 | CH1349 | Ⅳ | 0.5221 | 74 |
4 | CH1758 | Ⅰ | 0.6005 | 30 | 86 | CH1766 | Ⅳ | 0.5513 | 59 |
5 | CH1735 | Ⅰ | 0.5237 | 72 | 87 | CH16399 | Ⅳ | 0.5050 | 90 |
6 | CH16417 | Ⅰ | 0.5368 | 63 | 88 | CH1346 | Ⅳ | 0.5432 | 61 |
7 | CH1521 | Ⅰ | 0.5681 | 50 | 89 | CH1768 | Ⅳ | 0.5550 | 57 |
8 | CH16110 | Ⅰ | 0.5072 | 88 | 90 | CH16368 | Ⅳ | 0.5666 | 52 |
9 | CH1770 | Ⅰ | 0.4985 | 99 | 91 | CH1696 | Ⅳ | 0.5160 | 79 |
10 | CH1556 | Ⅰ | 0.5772 | 43 | 92 | CH16106 | Ⅳ | 0.5160 | 78 |
11 | CH122 | Ⅰ | 0.5061 | 89 | 93 | CH16100 | Ⅳ | 0.5515 | 58 |
12 | CH16396 | Ⅰ | 0.4921 | 104 | 94 | CH16372 | Ⅳ | 0.5665 | 53 |
13 | CH16383 | Ⅰ | 0.4938 | 103 | 95 | CH16379 | Ⅳ | 0.5719 | 47 |
14 | CH0330 | Ⅰ | 0.5257 | 71 | 96 | CH16347 | Ⅳ | 0.5165 | 76 |
15 | CH1640 | Ⅰ | 0.5600 | 54 | 97 | CH16435 | Ⅳ | 0.5234 | 73 |
16 | CH0984 | Ⅰ | 0.5132 | 80 | 98 | CH16112 | Ⅳ | 0.4990 | 98 |
17 | CH0985 | Ⅰ | 0.5114 | 84 | 99 | CH16340 | Ⅳ | 0.4682 | 111 |
18 | CH1352 | Ⅰ | 0.5075 | 87 | 100 | CH15132 | Ⅳ | 0.4895 | 105 |
19 | CH0983 | Ⅰ | 0.4499 | 116 | 101 | CH1625 | Ⅳ | 0.5486 | 60 |
20 | CH1762 | Ⅰ | 0.5274 | 68 | 102 | CH1364 | Ⅳ | 0.4957 | 101 |
21 | CH16343 | Ⅰ | 0.4135 | 130 | 103 | CH16424 | Ⅳ | 0.4716 | 109 |
22 | CH1729 | Ⅰ | 0.3369 | 153 | 104 | CH16436 | Ⅳ | 0.4954 | 102 |
23 | CH1302 | Ⅰ | 0.6417 | 21 | 105 | CH16387 | Ⅳ | 0.5089 | 86 |
24 | CH16402 | Ⅰ | 0.5801 | 42 | 106 | CH16446 | Ⅳ | 0.4492 | 117 |
25 | CH16380 | Ⅰ | 0.5938 | 34 | 107 | CH16377 | Ⅳ | 0.4466 | 118 |
26 | CH1723 | Ⅰ | 0.6095 | 26 | 108 | CH16394 | Ⅳ | 0.3734 | 145 |
27 | CH1646 | Ⅰ | 0.6175 | 25 | 109 | CH16102 | Ⅳ | 0.4616 | 115 |
28 | CH16389 | Ⅰ | 0.6073 | 27 | 110 | CH1686 | Ⅳ | 0.4182 | 129 |
29 | CH1739 | Ⅰ | 0.5357 | 66 | 111 | CH16386 | Ⅳ | 0.5023 | 94 |
30 | CH1362 | Ⅰ | 0.5720 | 46 | 112 | CH1343H | Ⅳ | 0.5119 | 83 |
31 | CH1363 | Ⅰ | 0.5588 | 56 | 113 | CH0987 | Ⅳ | 0.6043 | 29 |
32 | CH16342 | Ⅰ | 0.5708 | 48 | 114 | CH16444 | Ⅴ | 0.2706 | 159 |
33 | CH16360 | Ⅰ | 0.5307 | 67 | 115 | CH1750 | V | 0.3087 | 157 |
34 | CH16390 | Ⅰ | 0.5678 | 51 | 116 | CH6002 | V | 0.3762 | 143 |
35 | CH16410 | Ⅰ | 0.5378 | 62 | 117 | CH7102 | V | 0.3785 | 139 |
36 | CH16405 | Ⅰ | 0.5367 | 64 | 118 | CH262 | V | 0.3623 | 150 |
37 | CH16395 | Ⅰ | 0.5827 | 40 | 119 | CH1623 | V | 0.3385 | 152 |
38 | CH16369 | Ⅰ | 0.5828 | 39 | 120 | CH16445 | V | 0.3672 | 149 |
39 | CH16108 | Ⅰ | 0.5884 | 35 | 121 | CH223 | V | 0.3239 | 154 |
40 | CH1726 | Ⅰ | 0.6002 | 32 | 122 | CH16425 | V | 0.3707 | 147 |
41 | CH16406 | Ⅰ | 0.5109 | 85 | 123 | CH0329 | V | 0.3999 | 135 |
42 | CH1675 | Ⅰ | 0.3779 | 140 | 124 | CH16442 | V | 0.2616 | 160 |
43 | CH1355 | Ⅱ | 0.4308 | 126 | 125 | CH16443 | V | 0.3145 | 155 |
44 | CH16418 | Ⅱ | 0.4186 | 128 | 126 | CH7034 | Ⅵ | 0.1483 | 162 |
45 | CH16359 | Ⅱ | 0.4396 | 121 | 127 | CH9767 | Ⅵ | 0.1110 | 163 |
46 | CH15145 | Ⅱ | 0.4386 | 123 | 128 | CH1558 | Ⅵ | 0.2924 | 158 |
47 | CH16118 | Ⅱ | 0.4677 | 112 | 129 | CH16449 | Ⅵ | 0.3088 | 156 |
48 | CH16426 | Ⅱ | 0.5266 | 70 | 130 | CH1679 | Ⅵ | 0.3767 | 142 |
49 | CH16441 | Ⅱ | 0.5197 | 75 | 131 | CH1529 | Ⅵ | 0.3874 | 138 |
50 | CH16349 | Ⅱ | 0.5163 | 77 | 132 | CH16420 | Ⅵ | 0.3882 | 137 |
51 | CH16384 | Ⅱ | 0.5821 | 41 | 133 | CH16344 | Ⅵ | 0.3695 | 148 |
52 | CH16438 | Ⅱ | 0.5840 | 36 | 134 | CH-1 | Ⅵ | 0.3594 | 151 |
53 | CH16392 | Ⅱ | 0.5129 | 81 | 135 | CH9763 | Ⅵ | 0.3709 | 146 |
54 | CH1715 | Ⅱ | 0.5592 | 55 | 136 | CH1343 | Ⅵ | 0.2350 | 161 |
55 | CH16412 | Ⅱ | 0.5361 | 65 | 137 | CH1539 | Ⅵ | 0.3773 | 141 |
56 | CH0982 | Ⅱ | 0.5748 | 45 | 138 | CH16352 | Ⅵ | 0.4395 | 122 |
57 | CH16116 | Ⅱ | 0.5695 | 49 | 139 | CH4151 | Ⅵ | 0.4075 | 131 |
58 | CH16358 | Ⅱ | 0.4961 | 100 | 140 | CH1677 | Ⅵ | 0.4042 | 133 |
59 | CH16440 | Ⅱ | 0.5761 | 44 | 141 | CH16355 | Ⅵ | 0.5026 | 93 |
60 | CH16423 | Ⅱ | 0.6374 | 23 | 142 | CH16397 | Ⅵ | 0.5034 | 92 |
61 | CH1742 | Ⅲ | 0.7260 | 2 | 143 | CH16404 | Ⅵ | 0.4704 | 110 |
62 | CH16364 | Ⅲ | 0.7181 | 6 | 144 | CH9301 | Ⅵ | 0.3911 | 136 |
63 | CH16374 | Ⅲ | 0.6804 | 9 | 145 | CH16407 | Ⅵ | 0.4439 | 120 |
64 | CH16381 | Ⅲ | 0.6402 | 22 | 146 | CH16416 | Ⅵ | 0.3756 | 144 |
65 | CH16376 | Ⅲ | 0.6582 | 16 | 147 | CH16413 | Ⅵ | 0.4189 | 127 |
66 | CH16385 | Ⅲ | 0.7236 | 4 | 148 | CH16357 | Ⅵ | 0.4064 | 132 |
67 | CH16373 | Ⅲ | 0.6990 | 7 | 149 | CH1745 | Ⅵ | 0.4020 | 134 |
68 | CH16362 | Ⅲ | 0.6510 | 20 | 150 | CH16346 | Ⅵ | 0.4619 | 114 |
69 | CH1711 | Ⅲ | 0.6748 | 11 | 151 | CH006 | Ⅵ | 0.4343 | 124 |
70 | CH16400 | Ⅲ | 0.6710 | 13 | 152 | CH16484 | Ⅵ | 0.4450 | 119 |
71 | CH16375 | Ⅲ | 0.6612 | 14 | 153 | CH16403 | Ⅵ | 0.4313 | 125 |
72 | CH16382 | Ⅲ | 0.7200 | 5 | 154 | CH1755 | Ⅵ | 0.5008 | 97 |
73 | CH16353 | Ⅲ | 0.8112 | 1 | 155 | CH16399 | Ⅵ | 0.5050 | 90 |
74 | CH0981 | Ⅲ | 0.6537 | 19 | 156 | CH16354 | Ⅵ | 0.5015 | 96 |
75 | CH16378 | Ⅲ | 0.6573 | 17 | 157 | CH1361 | Ⅵ | 0.5121 | 82 |
76 | CH16348 | Ⅲ | 0.6557 | 18 | 158 | CH16415 | Ⅵ | 0.4744 | 106 |
77 | CH16432 | Ⅲ | 0.6602 | 15 | 159 | CH3286 | Ⅵ | 0.5017 | 95 |
78 | CH16370 | Ⅲ | 0.7241 | 3 | 160 | CH6310 | Ⅵ | 0.4717 | 108 |
79 | CH16104 | Ⅲ | 0.6780 | 10 | 161 | CH1357 | Ⅵ | 0.4720 | 107 |
80 | CH16422 | Ⅲ | 0.6739 | 12 | 162 | CH1698 | Ⅵ | 0.4634 | 113 |
81 | CH1681 | Ⅲ | 0.6319 | 24 | 163 | CH16409 | Ⅵ | 0.5268 | 69 |
82 | CH16434 | Ⅲ | 0.6004 | 31 |
Table 6 Comprehensive evaluation of 163 octoploid Tritipyrum-derived lines
序号 No. | 品系 Line | 类群 Group | D值 D value | 位次 Ranking | 序号 No. | 品系 Line | 类群 Group | D值 D value | 位次 Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CH0977 | Ⅰ | 0.5833 | 37 | 83 | CH16433 | Ⅲ | 0.6067 | 28 |
2 | CH16398 | Ⅰ | 0.5830 | 38 | 84 | CH16371 | Ⅲ | 0.6971 | 8 |
3 | CH16419 | Ⅰ | 0.5997 | 33 | 85 | CH1349 | Ⅳ | 0.5221 | 74 |
4 | CH1758 | Ⅰ | 0.6005 | 30 | 86 | CH1766 | Ⅳ | 0.5513 | 59 |
5 | CH1735 | Ⅰ | 0.5237 | 72 | 87 | CH16399 | Ⅳ | 0.5050 | 90 |
6 | CH16417 | Ⅰ | 0.5368 | 63 | 88 | CH1346 | Ⅳ | 0.5432 | 61 |
7 | CH1521 | Ⅰ | 0.5681 | 50 | 89 | CH1768 | Ⅳ | 0.5550 | 57 |
8 | CH16110 | Ⅰ | 0.5072 | 88 | 90 | CH16368 | Ⅳ | 0.5666 | 52 |
9 | CH1770 | Ⅰ | 0.4985 | 99 | 91 | CH1696 | Ⅳ | 0.5160 | 79 |
10 | CH1556 | Ⅰ | 0.5772 | 43 | 92 | CH16106 | Ⅳ | 0.5160 | 78 |
11 | CH122 | Ⅰ | 0.5061 | 89 | 93 | CH16100 | Ⅳ | 0.5515 | 58 |
12 | CH16396 | Ⅰ | 0.4921 | 104 | 94 | CH16372 | Ⅳ | 0.5665 | 53 |
13 | CH16383 | Ⅰ | 0.4938 | 103 | 95 | CH16379 | Ⅳ | 0.5719 | 47 |
14 | CH0330 | Ⅰ | 0.5257 | 71 | 96 | CH16347 | Ⅳ | 0.5165 | 76 |
15 | CH1640 | Ⅰ | 0.5600 | 54 | 97 | CH16435 | Ⅳ | 0.5234 | 73 |
16 | CH0984 | Ⅰ | 0.5132 | 80 | 98 | CH16112 | Ⅳ | 0.4990 | 98 |
17 | CH0985 | Ⅰ | 0.5114 | 84 | 99 | CH16340 | Ⅳ | 0.4682 | 111 |
18 | CH1352 | Ⅰ | 0.5075 | 87 | 100 | CH15132 | Ⅳ | 0.4895 | 105 |
19 | CH0983 | Ⅰ | 0.4499 | 116 | 101 | CH1625 | Ⅳ | 0.5486 | 60 |
20 | CH1762 | Ⅰ | 0.5274 | 68 | 102 | CH1364 | Ⅳ | 0.4957 | 101 |
21 | CH16343 | Ⅰ | 0.4135 | 130 | 103 | CH16424 | Ⅳ | 0.4716 | 109 |
22 | CH1729 | Ⅰ | 0.3369 | 153 | 104 | CH16436 | Ⅳ | 0.4954 | 102 |
23 | CH1302 | Ⅰ | 0.6417 | 21 | 105 | CH16387 | Ⅳ | 0.5089 | 86 |
24 | CH16402 | Ⅰ | 0.5801 | 42 | 106 | CH16446 | Ⅳ | 0.4492 | 117 |
25 | CH16380 | Ⅰ | 0.5938 | 34 | 107 | CH16377 | Ⅳ | 0.4466 | 118 |
26 | CH1723 | Ⅰ | 0.6095 | 26 | 108 | CH16394 | Ⅳ | 0.3734 | 145 |
27 | CH1646 | Ⅰ | 0.6175 | 25 | 109 | CH16102 | Ⅳ | 0.4616 | 115 |
28 | CH16389 | Ⅰ | 0.6073 | 27 | 110 | CH1686 | Ⅳ | 0.4182 | 129 |
29 | CH1739 | Ⅰ | 0.5357 | 66 | 111 | CH16386 | Ⅳ | 0.5023 | 94 |
30 | CH1362 | Ⅰ | 0.5720 | 46 | 112 | CH1343H | Ⅳ | 0.5119 | 83 |
31 | CH1363 | Ⅰ | 0.5588 | 56 | 113 | CH0987 | Ⅳ | 0.6043 | 29 |
32 | CH16342 | Ⅰ | 0.5708 | 48 | 114 | CH16444 | Ⅴ | 0.2706 | 159 |
33 | CH16360 | Ⅰ | 0.5307 | 67 | 115 | CH1750 | V | 0.3087 | 157 |
34 | CH16390 | Ⅰ | 0.5678 | 51 | 116 | CH6002 | V | 0.3762 | 143 |
35 | CH16410 | Ⅰ | 0.5378 | 62 | 117 | CH7102 | V | 0.3785 | 139 |
36 | CH16405 | Ⅰ | 0.5367 | 64 | 118 | CH262 | V | 0.3623 | 150 |
37 | CH16395 | Ⅰ | 0.5827 | 40 | 119 | CH1623 | V | 0.3385 | 152 |
38 | CH16369 | Ⅰ | 0.5828 | 39 | 120 | CH16445 | V | 0.3672 | 149 |
39 | CH16108 | Ⅰ | 0.5884 | 35 | 121 | CH223 | V | 0.3239 | 154 |
40 | CH1726 | Ⅰ | 0.6002 | 32 | 122 | CH16425 | V | 0.3707 | 147 |
41 | CH16406 | Ⅰ | 0.5109 | 85 | 123 | CH0329 | V | 0.3999 | 135 |
42 | CH1675 | Ⅰ | 0.3779 | 140 | 124 | CH16442 | V | 0.2616 | 160 |
43 | CH1355 | Ⅱ | 0.4308 | 126 | 125 | CH16443 | V | 0.3145 | 155 |
44 | CH16418 | Ⅱ | 0.4186 | 128 | 126 | CH7034 | Ⅵ | 0.1483 | 162 |
45 | CH16359 | Ⅱ | 0.4396 | 121 | 127 | CH9767 | Ⅵ | 0.1110 | 163 |
46 | CH15145 | Ⅱ | 0.4386 | 123 | 128 | CH1558 | Ⅵ | 0.2924 | 158 |
47 | CH16118 | Ⅱ | 0.4677 | 112 | 129 | CH16449 | Ⅵ | 0.3088 | 156 |
48 | CH16426 | Ⅱ | 0.5266 | 70 | 130 | CH1679 | Ⅵ | 0.3767 | 142 |
49 | CH16441 | Ⅱ | 0.5197 | 75 | 131 | CH1529 | Ⅵ | 0.3874 | 138 |
50 | CH16349 | Ⅱ | 0.5163 | 77 | 132 | CH16420 | Ⅵ | 0.3882 | 137 |
51 | CH16384 | Ⅱ | 0.5821 | 41 | 133 | CH16344 | Ⅵ | 0.3695 | 148 |
52 | CH16438 | Ⅱ | 0.5840 | 36 | 134 | CH-1 | Ⅵ | 0.3594 | 151 |
53 | CH16392 | Ⅱ | 0.5129 | 81 | 135 | CH9763 | Ⅵ | 0.3709 | 146 |
54 | CH1715 | Ⅱ | 0.5592 | 55 | 136 | CH1343 | Ⅵ | 0.2350 | 161 |
55 | CH16412 | Ⅱ | 0.5361 | 65 | 137 | CH1539 | Ⅵ | 0.3773 | 141 |
56 | CH0982 | Ⅱ | 0.5748 | 45 | 138 | CH16352 | Ⅵ | 0.4395 | 122 |
57 | CH16116 | Ⅱ | 0.5695 | 49 | 139 | CH4151 | Ⅵ | 0.4075 | 131 |
58 | CH16358 | Ⅱ | 0.4961 | 100 | 140 | CH1677 | Ⅵ | 0.4042 | 133 |
59 | CH16440 | Ⅱ | 0.5761 | 44 | 141 | CH16355 | Ⅵ | 0.5026 | 93 |
60 | CH16423 | Ⅱ | 0.6374 | 23 | 142 | CH16397 | Ⅵ | 0.5034 | 92 |
61 | CH1742 | Ⅲ | 0.7260 | 2 | 143 | CH16404 | Ⅵ | 0.4704 | 110 |
62 | CH16364 | Ⅲ | 0.7181 | 6 | 144 | CH9301 | Ⅵ | 0.3911 | 136 |
63 | CH16374 | Ⅲ | 0.6804 | 9 | 145 | CH16407 | Ⅵ | 0.4439 | 120 |
64 | CH16381 | Ⅲ | 0.6402 | 22 | 146 | CH16416 | Ⅵ | 0.3756 | 144 |
65 | CH16376 | Ⅲ | 0.6582 | 16 | 147 | CH16413 | Ⅵ | 0.4189 | 127 |
66 | CH16385 | Ⅲ | 0.7236 | 4 | 148 | CH16357 | Ⅵ | 0.4064 | 132 |
67 | CH16373 | Ⅲ | 0.6990 | 7 | 149 | CH1745 | Ⅵ | 0.4020 | 134 |
68 | CH16362 | Ⅲ | 0.6510 | 20 | 150 | CH16346 | Ⅵ | 0.4619 | 114 |
69 | CH1711 | Ⅲ | 0.6748 | 11 | 151 | CH006 | Ⅵ | 0.4343 | 124 |
70 | CH16400 | Ⅲ | 0.6710 | 13 | 152 | CH16484 | Ⅵ | 0.4450 | 119 |
71 | CH16375 | Ⅲ | 0.6612 | 14 | 153 | CH16403 | Ⅵ | 0.4313 | 125 |
72 | CH16382 | Ⅲ | 0.7200 | 5 | 154 | CH1755 | Ⅵ | 0.5008 | 97 |
73 | CH16353 | Ⅲ | 0.8112 | 1 | 155 | CH16399 | Ⅵ | 0.5050 | 90 |
74 | CH0981 | Ⅲ | 0.6537 | 19 | 156 | CH16354 | Ⅵ | 0.5015 | 96 |
75 | CH16378 | Ⅲ | 0.6573 | 17 | 157 | CH1361 | Ⅵ | 0.5121 | 82 |
76 | CH16348 | Ⅲ | 0.6557 | 18 | 158 | CH16415 | Ⅵ | 0.4744 | 106 |
77 | CH16432 | Ⅲ | 0.6602 | 15 | 159 | CH3286 | Ⅵ | 0.5017 | 95 |
78 | CH16370 | Ⅲ | 0.7241 | 3 | 160 | CH6310 | Ⅵ | 0.4717 | 108 |
79 | CH16104 | Ⅲ | 0.6780 | 10 | 161 | CH1357 | Ⅵ | 0.4720 | 107 |
80 | CH16422 | Ⅲ | 0.6739 | 12 | 162 | CH1698 | Ⅵ | 0.4634 | 113 |
81 | CH1681 | Ⅲ | 0.6319 | 24 | 163 | CH16409 | Ⅵ | 0.5268 | 69 |
82 | CH16434 | Ⅲ | 0.6004 | 31 |
1 | He Z H, Zhuang Q S, Cheng S H, et al. Wheat production and technology improvement in China. Journal of Agriculture, 2018, 8(1): 99-106. |
何中虎, 庄巧生, 程顺和, 等. 中国小麦产业发展与科技进步. 农学学报, 2018, 8(1): 99-106. | |
2 | Liu X, Li L H, Li Y, et al. Crop germplasm resources: Advances and trends. Journal of Agriculture, 2018, 8(1): 1-6. |
刘旭, 李立会, 黎裕, 等. 作物种质资源研究回顾与发展趋势. 农学学报, 2018, 8(1): 1-6. | |
3 | Ma Y M, Feng Z Y, Wang W, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of winter wheat landraces and modern bred varieties in Xinjiang based on agronomic traits. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(12): 1997-2007. |
马艳明, 冯智宇, 王威, 等. 新疆冬小麦品种农艺及产量性状遗传多样性分析. 作物学报, 2020, 46(12): 1997-2007. | |
4 | Yi T F, Li S S, Li J H, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of 261 bread wheat cultivars base on agronomic traits. Journal of Hebei Agricultural University, 2018, 41(2): 7-13. |
易腾飞, 李珊珊, 李嘉豪, 等. 261份小麦品种基于农艺性状的遗传多样性分析. 河北农业大学学报, 2018, 41(2): 7-13. | |
5 | Chai Y F, Li X R, Zhao Z Y, et al. Diversity analysis of agronomic and quality characters of foreign wheat germplasm resources. Journal of Agriculture, 2013, 3(9): 1-8. |
柴永峰, 李秀绒, 赵智勇, 等. 国外小麦种质资源农艺性状及品质性状的多样性分析. 农学学报, 2013, 3(9): 1-8. | |
6 | Ma G J, Ma J F, Zhang P P, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of agronomic characters of 128 new drought-resistant winter wheat strains. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2021, 56(3): 37-44. |
马国江, 马靖福, 张沛沛, 等. 128份抗旱冬小麦新品系农艺性状遗传多样性分析. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2021, 56(3): 37-44. | |
7 | Li J, Nan M. Analysis of agronomic characters and genetic diversity of 62 winter wheat germplasms from Russia and Ukraine in Northwest China. Crops, 2019(5): 9-14. |
李晶, 南铭. 俄罗斯和乌克兰引进冬小麦在我国西北地区的农艺性状表现和遗传多样性分析. 作物杂志, 2019(5): 9-14. | |
8 | Wang G L, Liu Z H, Cheng Q Q, et al. Analysis of main agronomic characters of 94 foreign wheat germplasm materials. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2016, 36(5): 577-582. |
王光禄, 刘志宏, 程倩倩, 等. 94份国外小麦种质材料的主要农艺性状分析. 麦类作物学报, 2016, 36(5): 577-582. | |
9 | Cui G H, Ye J, Wu X H, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of phenotype traits of spring wheat parental resources in Inner Mongolia. Journal of Northern Agriculture, 2020, 48(3): 1-9. |
崔国惠, 叶君, 吴晓华, 等. 内蒙古春小麦亲本资源表型性状遗传多样性分析. 北方农业学报, 2020, 48(3): 1-9. | |
10 | Zeng C W, Liang X D, Li J J. Genetic diversity analysis on main characters of spring wheat germplasms in central Asia. Crops, 2017(2): 67-71. |
曾潮武, 梁晓东, 李建疆. 中亚引进春小麦种质资源主要农艺性状的遗传多样性分析. 作物杂志, 2017(2): 67-71. | |
11 | Hao C Y, Dong Y C, Wang L F, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and construction core germplasm of common wheat in China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2008, 53(8): 908-915. |
郝晨阳, 董玉琛, 王兰芬, 等. 我国普通小麦核心种质的构建及遗传多样性分析. 科学通报, 2008, 53(8): 908-915. | |
12 | Zheng J, Li X H, Zhao J J, et al. Analysis of genetic diversity of wheat breeded varieties in Shanxi Province. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2018, 19(4): 619-626. |
郑军, 李晓华, 赵佳佳, 等. 山西省小麦育成品种遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(4): 619-626. | |
13 | Cao T J, Xie J Z, Wu Q H, et al. Genetic diversity of registered wheat varieties in Henan Province based on pedigree and single-nucleotide polymorphism. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(2): 197-206. |
曹廷杰, 谢菁忠, 吴秋红, 等. 河南省近年审定小麦品种基于系谱和SNP标记的遗传多样性分析. 作物学报, 2015, 41(2): 197-206. | |
14 | Zhang Y J, Gou Z W, Wang X R, et al. An analysis of genetic diversity and linked agronomic traits of Heshangtou wheat in Northwest China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(2): 142-155. |
张彦军, 苟作旺, 王兴荣, 等.西北地区和尚头小麦遗传多样性及农艺性状的关联分析.草业学报, 2019, 28(2): 142-155. | |
15 | Bai Y M, Li L, Wang H Y, et al. Genetic diversity assessment in derivative offspring of Mazhamai and Xiaobaimai wheat. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45(10): 1468-1477. |
白彦明, 李龙, 王绘艳, 等. 蚂蚱麦和小白麦衍生系的遗传多样性分析. 作物学报, 2019, 45(10): 1468-1477. | |
16 | Jiang X L, Zhang Z Y, Li X J, et al. Genetic diversity of gliadin in 301 wheat germplasms and the relationship with quality properties. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2017, 32(11): 15-20. |
姜校苓, 张自阳, 李小军, 等. 301份小麦种质醇溶蛋白遗传多样性及其与品质性状的相关分析. 中国粮油学报, 2017, 32(11): 15-20. | |
17 | Wang Q Y, Feng W J, Zhang Q L, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of 56 synthetic hexaploid wheats. Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2021, 41(8): 960-968. |
王秋云, 冯雯杰, 张巧玲, 等. 56份人工合成六倍体小麦的遗传多样性分析. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(8): 960-968. | |
18 | Song Y, Li F, Wang J R, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of important agronomic traits of common wild rice germplasm accessions collected from China. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2020, 21(6): 1512-1520. |
宋玥, 李飞, 王君瑞, 等. 中国普通野生稻重要农艺性状的遗传多样性研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(6): 1512-1520. | |
19 | Meng Z Q, Song F P. Phenotypic diversity and group classification of maize landraces in Tibet. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2017, 22(7): 10-23. |
蒙祖庆, 宋丰萍. 西藏玉米地方品种表型多样性分析及类群划分. 中国农业大学学报, 2017, 22(7): 10-23. | |
20 | Yang T, Huang Y J, Li S M, et al. Genetic diversity and comprehensive evaluation of phenotypic traits in sea-island cotton germplasm resources. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(12): 2499-2509. |
杨涛, 黄雅婕, 李生梅, 等. 海岛棉种质资源类型表型性状的遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(12): 2499-2509. | |
21 | Wang H G, Jia G Q, Zhi H, et al. Phenotypic diversity evaluations of foxtail millet core collections. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(1): 19-30. |
王海岗, 贾冠清, 智慧, 等. 谷子核心种质表型遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 作物学报, 2016, 42(1): 19-30. | |
22 | Liu S C, Cao X N, Wen Q F, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of agronomic traits and quality traits of foxtail millet landrace in Shanxi. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(11): 2137-2148. |
刘思辰, 曹晓宁, 温琪汾, 等. 山西谷子地方品种农艺性状和品质性状的综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(11): 2137-2148. | |
23 | Lei X, You M H, Bai S Q, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and multivariate evaluation of agronomic traits of 50 oat germplasm lines in northwest Sichuan. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 131-142. |
雷雄, 游明鸿, 白史且, 等. 川西北高原50份燕麦种质农艺性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 草业学报, 2020, 29(7): 131-142. | |
24 | Wang H G, Liu S B, Qi Z J, et al. Application studies of Elytrigia intermedium in hereditary improvement of wheat. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2000, 31(3): 333-336. |
王洪刚, 刘树兵, 亓增军, 等.中间偃麦草在小麦遗传改良中的应用研究. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 31(3): 333-336. | |
25 | Lv W D, Xu P B, Pu X. Summary of the situation for applying genetic resources from Elytrigia in Triticum aestivum breeding. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2007, 16(6): 136-140. |
吕伟东, 徐鹏彬, 蒲训. 偃麦草属种质资源在普通小麦育种中的应用现状简介. 草业学报, 2007, 16(6): 136-140. | |
26 | Jiang B, Zhang S X, Wang H, et al. Genetic improvement and genomics-assisted breeding of the germplasm resource Thinopyrum intermedium. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2020, 21(6): 1385-1394. |
蒋勃, 张淑欣, 王惠, 等. 中间偃麦草种质改良及基因组学育种研究进展. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(6): 1385-1394. | |
27 | Li J L, Qu M, Zhang Y M. Wheat chromosome engineering. Beijing: Science Press, 2011: 20-60. |
李集临, 曲敏, 张延明. 小麦染色体工程. 北京: 科学出版社, 2011: 20-60. | |
28 | Sun S C. The approach and methods of breeding new varieties and new species from Agrotriticum hybrids. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1981, 7(1): 51-58. |
孙善澄. 小偃麦新品种与中间类型的选育途径、程序和方法. 作物学报, 1981, 7(1): 51-58. | |
29 | Chang Z J, Zhao H S, Li S H. Study on seed setting of distant hybridization between winter wheat and Agropyron glaucum. Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 1992, 20(2): 7-12. |
畅志坚, 赵怀生, 李生海. 冬小麦与天蓝偃麦草远缘杂交结实性的研究. 山西农业科学, 1992, 20(2): 7-12. | |
30 | Chang Z J, Zhang X J, Yang Z J, et al. Characterization of a partial wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium amphiploid and its reaction to fungal diseases of wheat. Heredita, 2010, 147(6): 304-312. |
31 | Liu J, Chang Z J, Zhang X J, et al. Putative Thinopyrum intermedium-derived stripe rust resistance gene Yr50 maps on wheat chromosome arm 4BL. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2013, 126(1): 265-274. |
32 | Chen F, Qiao L Y, Li R, et al. Genetic analysis and chromosomal localization of powdery mildew resistance gene in wheat germplasm CH1357. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2019, 45 (10): 1503-1510. |
陈芳, 乔麟轶, 李锐, 等. 小麦新种质CH1357抗白粉病遗传分析及染色体定位. 作物学报, 2019, 45 (10): 1503-1510. | |
33 | Zhang X J, Ma Y L, Guo H J, et al. Genetic analysis and chromosomal localization of powdery mildew resistance gene PmCH1302. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2017, 18(2): 318-324. |
张晓军, 马原丽, 郭慧娟, 等. 抗白粉病基因PmCH1302的遗传分析及染色体定位. 植物遗传资源学报, 2017, 18(2): 318-324. | |
34 | Li X, Zhang X J, Qiao L Y, et al. QTL mapping for powdery mildew resistance in adult plant of wheat cultivar CH7034. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019, 17(12): 3960-3965. |
李欣, 张晓军, 乔麟轶, 等. 小麦材料CH7034中成株期抗白粉病QTL定位. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(12): 3960-3965. | |
35 | Hou L Y, Jia J Q, Zhang X J, et al. Molecular mapping of the stripe rust resistance gene Yr69 on wheat chromosome 2AS. Plant Disease, 2016, 100(8): 1717-1724. |
36 | Guo H J, Zhang C Z, Zhang X J, et al. Evaluation of resistances to stripe rust and cytological characterization in wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium introgressions. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 28(3): 371-377. |
郭慧娟, 张丛卓, 张晓军, 等.小偃麦渗入系抗条锈性评价及细胞学鉴定. 核农学报, 2014, 28(3): 371-377. | |
37 | Zhang X J, Xiao J, Wang H Y, et al. Evaluation of resistance to Fusarium head blight in Thinopyrum-derived wheat lines. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(1): 62-73. |
张晓军, 肖进, 王海燕, 等. 小偃麦衍生品系的赤霉病抗性评价. 作物学报, 2020, 46(1): 62-73. | |
38 | Qiao L Y, Zhang X W, Li S J, et al. Salt-tolerance identification at seedling stage and molecular marker evaluation of wheat-Thinopyrum intermedium introgression lines. Shandong Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 53(5): 69-73. |
乔麟轶, 张潇文, 李世姣, 等. 小偃麦渗入系苗期耐盐鉴定与分子标记评价. 山东农业科学, 2021, 53(5): 69-73. | |
39 | Li L H, Li X Q, Yang X M, et al. Descriptors and data standard for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2006. |
李立会, 李秀全, 杨欣明, 等. 小麦种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006. | |
40 | Liu S C, Zheng D S, Cao Y S, et al. Genetic diversity of landrace and bred varieties of wheat in China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2000, 33(4): 20-24. |
刘三才, 郑殿升, 曹永生, 等. 中国小麦选育品种与地方品种的遗传多样性. 中国农业科学, 2000, 33(4): 20-24. | |
41 | Wang X M, Qiu L J, Jing R L, et al. Evaluation on phenotypic traits of crop germplasm: Status and development. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2022, 23(1): 12-20. |
王晓鸣, 邱丽娟, 景蕊莲, 等. 作物种质资源表型性状鉴定评价: 现状与趋势. 植物遗传资源学报, 2022, 23(1): 12-20. | |
42 | Hao C Y, Wang L F, Zhang X Y, et al. The evolution of genetic diversity of wheat cultivars bred in China. Science in China Series C: Life Science, 2005, 35(5): 408-415. |
郝晨阳, 王兰芬, 张学勇, 等. 我国育成小麦品种的遗传多样性演变. 中国科学C辑: 生命科学, 2005, 35(5): 408-415. | |
43 | Zhuang Q S. Chinese wheat improvement and pedigree analysis. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003. |
庄巧生. 中国小麦品种改良与系谱分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003. | |
44 | Liu C, Han R, Wang X L, et al. Research progress of wheat wild hybridization, disease resistance genes transfer and utilization. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(7): 1287-1308. |
刘成, 韩冉, 汪晓璐, 等. 小麦远缘杂交现状、抗病基因转移及利用研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(7): 1287-1308. | |
45 | Dai P H, Sun J L, He S P, et al. Comprehensive evaluation and genetic diversity analysis of phenotypic traits of core collection in upland cotton. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(19): 3649-3708. |
代攀虹, 孙君灵, 何守朴, 等. 陆地棉核心种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(19): 3649-3708. | |
46 | Zhou Y, Li Z B, Huang J, et al. Genetic diversity of sorghum germplasm based on phenotypic traits. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2021, 22(3): 654-664. |
周瑜, 李泽碧, 黄娟, 等. 高粱种质资源表型性状的遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(3): 654-664. | |
47 | Hu B L, Wan Y, Li X, et al. Analysis on genetic diversity of phenotypic traits in rice (Oryza sativa) core collection and its comprehensive assessment. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2012, 38(5): 829-839. |
胡标林, 万勇, 李霞, 等. 水稻核心种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 作物学报, 2012, 38(5): 829-839. | |
48 | Du X Y, Li N N, Zou S K, et al. Comprehensive analysis of main traits of newly bred wheat varieties (lines) in southern huang-huai region. Crops, 2021(4): 38-45. |
杜晓宇, 李楠楠, 邹少奎, 等. 黄淮南片新育成小麦品种(系)主要性状的综合性分析. 作物杂志, 2021(4): 38-45. | |
49 | Ding M L, Lin L P, Li M J, et al. Genetic diversity analysis and comprehensive evaluation of quality traits of wheat varieties(lines) bred in Yunnan. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2020, 51(2): 255-266. |
丁明亮, 林丽萍, 李明菊, 等. 云南育成小麦品种(系)品质性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(2): 255-266. |
[1] | Shi-long MA, Xiao-wei LI, Xiang LI, Shu-qiong XIE, Yi-li LIU, Jiao TANG, Ming-feng JIANG. Assessment of genetic structure of 3 Maiwa yak preserved populations based on genotyping-by-sequencing technology [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(9): 183-194. |
[2] | Xue-feng REN, Ya-bo DENG, Guo-zhang ZANG, Yi-qi ZHENG. A SSR marker analysis of genetic diversity and population genetic structure of bermudagrass in Henan Province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3): 60-70. |
[3] | Jing PAN, Jun-chao ZHANG, You-jun CHEN, Qing-ping ZHOU. Genetic diversity analysis and fingerprint construction of Elymus germplasm based on SCoT markers [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(11): 48-60. |
[4] | Xiao-fan YIN, Na WEI, Shu-wen ZHENG, Wen-xian LIU. Genome-wide development and utilization of LTR retrotransposon-based IRAP markers in Medicago truncatula [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(1): 131-144. |
[5] | Hui JI, Jiu-qiang GUAN, Hui WANG, Jian-xu ZHOU, Nong-ga A, Zong-wei HE, Zhen-xiang FAN, Long-kang QIU, Shi-xiao CAO, Tian-wu AN, Qin BAI, Jin-cheng ZHONG, Xiao-lin LUO. Genetic structure and diversity of Yading yak and Larima yak populations [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 134-145. |
[6] | Yan PENG, Jing-yuan SUN, Su-jie MA, Xiang-tao WANG, Lei SUN, Xue-hong WEI. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on production performance and nutritive value of pasture species in Northern Tibet [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(5): 52-64. |
[7] | Zheng-yu YANG, Zhong-jie LU, Mao ZHANG, Rui DONG. A digital image analysis of seed phenotypic traits of 132 Lespedeza accessions [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(11): 87-97. |
[8] | ZENG Ling-shuang, LI Pei-ying, SUN Xiao-fan, SUN Zong-jiu. A multi-trait evaluation of drought resistance of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) germplasm from different habitats in Xinjiang province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(8): 155-169. |
[9] | LEI Xiong, YOU Ming-hong, BAI Shi-qie, CHEN Li-li, DENG Pei-hua, XIONG Yi, XIONG Yan-li, YU Qing-qing, MA Xiao, YANG Jian, ZHANG Chang-bing. Genetic diversity analysis and multivariate evaluation of agronomic traits of 50 oat germplasm lines in northwest Sichuan [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 131-142. |
[10] | DING Yong-fu, WANG Ji-liang, CHEN Fen-qi, ZHUANG Ze-long, BAI Ming-xing, LU Yan-tian, JIN Bing-bing, PENG Yun-ling. Correlation between SSR diversity and ear traits of maize inbred lines [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(7): 143-153. |
[11] | ZHANG Xue-ting, WANG Xin-yong, YANG Wen-xiong, LIU Na, YANG Chang-gang. Evaluation of water-saving and drought-resistant maize varieties in the Hexi oasis irrigation corridor [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2020, 29(2): 134-148. |
[12] | WANG Jian-li, MA Li-chao, SHEN Zhong-bao, LIU Jie-lin, ZHU Rui-fen, HAN Wei-bo, ZHONG Peng, DI Gui-li, HAN Gui-qing, GUO Chang-hong. An evaluation of agronomic traits and genetic diversity among 51 oat germplasm accessions [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(2): 133-141. |
[13] | ZHANG Yan-jun, GOU Zuo-wang, WANG Xing-rong, LI Yue, QI Xu-sheng. An analysis of genetic diversity and linked agronomic traits of Heshangtou wheat in northwest China [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(2): 142-155. |
[14] | GONG Wen-long, WANG Zan, ZHAO Gui-qin, MA Lin, WEI Bao, GONG Pan, LIU Xi-qiang. Development of EST-SSR molecular markers and analysis of genetic diversity of erect milk vetch (Astragalus adsurgens) [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(11): 147-158. |
[15] | ZHU Juan-juan, YU Chun-ming, CHEN Ji-kang, WANG Yan-zhou, CHEN Ping, XIONG He-ping. Effects of exogenous selenium on grass yield and nutritive value of forage ramie [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(10): 144-155. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||