Acta Prataculturae Sinica ›› 2024, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 185-198.DOI: 10.11686/cyxb2023409
Hao GUAN1(), Duo XU1, Hai-ping LI3, Zhi-feng JIA2, Xiang MA2, Wen-hui LIU2, You-jun CHEN1, Xin-yang LI1, Yan-ling HUANG4, Qing-ping ZHOU1, Shi-yong CHEN1()
Received:
2023-10-25
Revised:
2023-12-27
Online:
2024-09-20
Published:
2024-06-20
Contact:
Shi-yong CHEN
Hao GUAN, Duo XU, Hai-ping LI, Zhi-feng JIA, Xiang MA, Wen-hui LIU, You-jun CHEN, Xin-yang LI, Yan-ling HUANG, Qing-ping ZHOU, Shi-yong CHEN. A study of nutritional quality and rumen degradation characteristics of 17 oat varieties in high cold regions[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(9): 185-198.
品种 Varieties | 干物质 Dry matter (%FW) | 粗脂肪 Ether extract (%DM) | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (%DM) | 粗灰分 Ash (%DM) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (%DM) | 中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (%DM) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%DM) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 31.70b | 3.03cd | 4.44gh | 4.98fghi | 12.61a | 50.72h | 25.77gh |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 30.61bc | 3.60abc | 4.68f | 4.89hijk | 8.82bc | 56.33de | 28.56de |
贝勒Baler | 29.08fg | 2.10fgh | 4.60fg | 6.00b | 6.12defg | 54.29fg | 26.88fgh |
牧王Haymaker | 28.02hi | 2.27efg | 4.87e | 4.84ijk | 8.86bc | 54.09fg | 27.38efg |
悍马Hanma | 28.97fgh | 3.74ab | 4.46gh | 5.23def | 6.40def | 53.01g | 27.24efg |
坝燕6号Bayan No. 6 | 29.78def | 3.02cd | 5.44c | 5.15efg | 4.09gh | 62.31a | 32.38a |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | 24.44j | 3.17bcd | 4.42gh | 5.12efgh | 3.49h | 57.14d | 31.06ab |
太阳神Titan | 27.83i | 3.12bcd | 6.16a | 4.58l | 5.31efgh | 60.17b | 31.66ab |
优牧1号Youmu No. 1 | 27.94i | 1.74gh | 4.67f | 5.43d | 6.32def | 56.72d | 29.39cd |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 32.11ab | 3.93a | 5.48c | 5.21def | 5.34efgh | 53.76g | 28.07def |
梦龙Magnum | 30.17de | 1.60h | 5.85b | 4.67jkl | 7.41cde | 58.78c | 30.32bc |
青甜1号Qingtian No.1 | 31.47bc | 3.99a | 5.51c | 5.30de | 9.59b | 53.23g | 25.23hi |
福瑞至Forage plus | 30.31de | 2.61def | 4.59fg | 4.92ghij | 4.93fgh | 55.30ef | 29.30cd |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 30.31de | 4.03a | 6.23a | 6.51a | 7.81bcd | 51.68h | 26.12gh |
甜燕3号Tianyan No. 3 | 28.68ghi | 4.03a | 5.07d | 4.75ijkl | 7.44cde | 49.16i | 25.89gh |
莫妮卡Monica | 32.91a | 2.82de | 5.85b | 5.67c | 5.73defg | 56.43de | 31.96a |
甜燕1号Tianyan No. 1 | 29.31efg | 2.03fgh | 4.35h | 4.65kl | 6.61def | 45.56j | 23.75i |
标准误Standard error | 0.2826 | 0.1318 | 0.0899 | 0.0738 | 0.3276 | 0.5968 | 0.3801 |
P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 1 Nutrient content of 17 oat varieties
品种 Varieties | 干物质 Dry matter (%FW) | 粗脂肪 Ether extract (%DM) | 粗蛋白 Crude protein (%DM) | 粗灰分 Ash (%DM) | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar (%DM) | 中性洗涤纤维Neutral detergent fiber (%DM) | 酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (%DM) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 31.70b | 3.03cd | 4.44gh | 4.98fghi | 12.61a | 50.72h | 25.77gh |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 30.61bc | 3.60abc | 4.68f | 4.89hijk | 8.82bc | 56.33de | 28.56de |
贝勒Baler | 29.08fg | 2.10fgh | 4.60fg | 6.00b | 6.12defg | 54.29fg | 26.88fgh |
牧王Haymaker | 28.02hi | 2.27efg | 4.87e | 4.84ijk | 8.86bc | 54.09fg | 27.38efg |
悍马Hanma | 28.97fgh | 3.74ab | 4.46gh | 5.23def | 6.40def | 53.01g | 27.24efg |
坝燕6号Bayan No. 6 | 29.78def | 3.02cd | 5.44c | 5.15efg | 4.09gh | 62.31a | 32.38a |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | 24.44j | 3.17bcd | 4.42gh | 5.12efgh | 3.49h | 57.14d | 31.06ab |
太阳神Titan | 27.83i | 3.12bcd | 6.16a | 4.58l | 5.31efgh | 60.17b | 31.66ab |
优牧1号Youmu No. 1 | 27.94i | 1.74gh | 4.67f | 5.43d | 6.32def | 56.72d | 29.39cd |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 32.11ab | 3.93a | 5.48c | 5.21def | 5.34efgh | 53.76g | 28.07def |
梦龙Magnum | 30.17de | 1.60h | 5.85b | 4.67jkl | 7.41cde | 58.78c | 30.32bc |
青甜1号Qingtian No.1 | 31.47bc | 3.99a | 5.51c | 5.30de | 9.59b | 53.23g | 25.23hi |
福瑞至Forage plus | 30.31de | 2.61def | 4.59fg | 4.92ghij | 4.93fgh | 55.30ef | 29.30cd |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 30.31de | 4.03a | 6.23a | 6.51a | 7.81bcd | 51.68h | 26.12gh |
甜燕3号Tianyan No. 3 | 28.68ghi | 4.03a | 5.07d | 4.75ijkl | 7.44cde | 49.16i | 25.89gh |
莫妮卡Monica | 32.91a | 2.82de | 5.85b | 5.67c | 5.73defg | 56.43de | 31.96a |
甜燕1号Tianyan No. 1 | 29.31efg | 2.03fgh | 4.35h | 4.65kl | 6.61def | 45.56j | 23.75i |
标准误Standard error | 0.2826 | 0.1318 | 0.0899 | 0.0738 | 0.3276 | 0.5968 | 0.3801 |
P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
品种 Varieties | 相对饲喂 价值 Relative feeding value | 相对饲草 品质 Relative forage quality | 饲草分级指数 Forage grading index (MJ·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 125.72bc | 178.09bc | 8.91de |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 108.97fg | 145.45fg | 7.11ij |
贝勒Baler | 118.52de | 158.62ef | 7.73ghi |
牧王Haymaker | 116.22e | 159.59e | 8.29efg |
悍马Hanma | 118.78de | 164.56de | 7.93fgh |
坝燕6号Bayan No.6 | 95.06i | 118.32i | 6.41kl |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | 105.38gh | 138.44gh | 6.34l |
太阳神Titan | 98.24i | 124.51i | 7.71ghi |
优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 108.27fgh | 144.08fg | 7.00jk |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 116.02e | 159.20e | 9.35cd |
梦龙Magnum | 103.36h | 134.50h | 8.04fg |
青甜1号 Qingtian No.1 | 117.90de | 162.85e | 9.59c |
福瑞至Forage plus | 111.15f | 149.70f | 7.25hij |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 122.96cd | 172.72cd | 11.91a |
甜燕3号Tianyan No.3 | 130.07b | 186.59b | 10.73b |
莫妮卡Monica | 105.54gh | 138.75gh | 8.47ef |
甜燕1号Tianyan No.1 | 143.74a | 213.25a | 11.09b |
标准误Standard error | 1.7721 | 3.5035 | 0.2309 |
P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 2 The relative feeding value, relative forage quality and forage grading index of 17 oat varieties
品种 Varieties | 相对饲喂 价值 Relative feeding value | 相对饲草 品质 Relative forage quality | 饲草分级指数 Forage grading index (MJ·d-1) |
---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 125.72bc | 178.09bc | 8.91de |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 108.97fg | 145.45fg | 7.11ij |
贝勒Baler | 118.52de | 158.62ef | 7.73ghi |
牧王Haymaker | 116.22e | 159.59e | 8.29efg |
悍马Hanma | 118.78de | 164.56de | 7.93fgh |
坝燕6号Bayan No.6 | 95.06i | 118.32i | 6.41kl |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | 105.38gh | 138.44gh | 6.34l |
太阳神Titan | 98.24i | 124.51i | 7.71ghi |
优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 108.27fgh | 144.08fg | 7.00jk |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 116.02e | 159.20e | 9.35cd |
梦龙Magnum | 103.36h | 134.50h | 8.04fg |
青甜1号 Qingtian No.1 | 117.90de | 162.85e | 9.59c |
福瑞至Forage plus | 111.15f | 149.70f | 7.25hij |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 122.96cd | 172.72cd | 11.91a |
甜燕3号Tianyan No.3 | 130.07b | 186.59b | 10.73b |
莫妮卡Monica | 105.54gh | 138.75gh | 8.47ef |
甜燕1号Tianyan No.1 | 143.74a | 213.25a | 11.09b |
标准误Standard error | 1.7721 | 3.5035 | 0.2309 |
P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
品种 Varieties | pH | 氨态氮 NH3-N (mg·dL-1) | 干物质降解率 Dry matter degradation (%) |
---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 6.82de | 11.92defg | 70.93cd |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 6.95b | 10.72fgh | 74.21ab |
贝勒Baler | 6.90bcd | 11.36efg | 75.22ab |
牧王Haymaker | 7.00ab | 10.46gh | 76.47a |
悍马Hanma | 7.07a | 9.65h | 74.16ab |
坝燕6号Bayan No.6 | 6.73e | 12.22cdef | 68.71de |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | 6.83cde | 12.89cde | 65.41fg |
太阳神Titan | 6.90bcd | 13.08cd | 63.01g |
优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 6.83cde | 11.95defg | 73.11bc |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 6.93bc | 12.55cde | 65.49fg |
梦龙Magnum | 6.63f | 15.62a | 64.70fg |
青甜1号Qingtian No.1 | 6.77e | 15.08ab | 71.26cd |
福瑞至Forage plus | 6.80de | 13.80bc | 67.19ef |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 6.83cde | 15.87a | 63.65g |
甜燕3号Tianyan No.3 | 6.80de | 13.70bc | 70.15d |
莫妮卡Monica | 6.58f | 15.17ab | 69.55de |
甜燕1号Tianyan No.1 | 6.59f | 12.55cde | 75.76ab |
标准误Standard error | 0.0197 | 0.6814 | 0.2770 |
P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 3 In vitro fermentation parameters of 17 oat varieties
品种 Varieties | pH | 氨态氮 NH3-N (mg·dL-1) | 干物质降解率 Dry matter degradation (%) |
---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 6.82de | 11.92defg | 70.93cd |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 6.95b | 10.72fgh | 74.21ab |
贝勒Baler | 6.90bcd | 11.36efg | 75.22ab |
牧王Haymaker | 7.00ab | 10.46gh | 76.47a |
悍马Hanma | 7.07a | 9.65h | 74.16ab |
坝燕6号Bayan No.6 | 6.73e | 12.22cdef | 68.71de |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | 6.83cde | 12.89cde | 65.41fg |
太阳神Titan | 6.90bcd | 13.08cd | 63.01g |
优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 6.83cde | 11.95defg | 73.11bc |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 6.93bc | 12.55cde | 65.49fg |
梦龙Magnum | 6.63f | 15.62a | 64.70fg |
青甜1号Qingtian No.1 | 6.77e | 15.08ab | 71.26cd |
福瑞至Forage plus | 6.80de | 13.80bc | 67.19ef |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 6.83cde | 15.87a | 63.65g |
甜燕3号Tianyan No.3 | 6.80de | 13.70bc | 70.15d |
莫妮卡Monica | 6.58f | 15.17ab | 69.55de |
甜燕1号Tianyan No.1 | 6.59f | 12.55cde | 75.76ab |
标准误Standard error | 0.0197 | 0.6814 | 0.2770 |
P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
品种 Varieties | 72 h累计产气量 Cumulative gas production within 72 h (mL) | 理论最大产气量 Theoretical maximum gas production (mL) | 产气速率 Gas production rate (mL·h-1) | 延滞时间 Delay time (LAG,h) |
---|---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 71.32j | 98.52ab | 1.03j | -8.30de |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 100.47ab | 101.29ab | 2.35b | -5.91cd |
贝勒Baler | 83.58fgh | 85.83b | 1.17hi | -12.14gh |
牧王Haymaker | 105.28a | 101.50ab | 3.68a | -2.79b |
悍马Hanma | 56.59k | 85.23b | 0.59j | -33.59j |
坝燕6号Bayan No.6 | 86.12efg | 97.68ab | 1.33g | -16.36i |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | 96.56bc | 111.26a | 1.49f | -13.60hi |
太阳神Titan | 90.99cde | 111.12a | 1.26gh | -16.51i |
优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 94.66bcd | 106.06ab | 1.66e | -8.38de |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 80.68gh | 101.50ab | 1.13i | -13.66hi |
梦龙Magnum | 72.51ij | 87.62b | 1.10ij | -8.84def |
青甜1号Qingtian No.1 | 79.36h | 93.01ab | 1.17hi | -11.86gh |
福瑞至Forage plus | 70.36j | 91.21ab | 1.02k | -8.38de |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 88.88def | 92.32ab | 2.12c | 0.34a |
甜燕3号Tianyan No.3 | 77.95hi | 90.44ab | 1.14i | -12.02gh |
莫妮卡Monica | 82.16gh | 94.71ab | 1.26gh | -11.45fgh |
甜燕1号Tianyan No.1 | 90.88cde | 94.49ab | 1.66e | -9.20efg |
标准误Standard error | 1.860 | 1.508 | 0.007 | 0.228 |
P | <0.001 | 0.108 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 4 Cumulative gas production of 17 oat varieties within 72 hours and fitting values of parameters in the Compertz mode
品种 Varieties | 72 h累计产气量 Cumulative gas production within 72 h (mL) | 理论最大产气量 Theoretical maximum gas production (mL) | 产气速率 Gas production rate (mL·h-1) | 延滞时间 Delay time (LAG,h) |
---|---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 71.32j | 98.52ab | 1.03j | -8.30de |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 100.47ab | 101.29ab | 2.35b | -5.91cd |
贝勒Baler | 83.58fgh | 85.83b | 1.17hi | -12.14gh |
牧王Haymaker | 105.28a | 101.50ab | 3.68a | -2.79b |
悍马Hanma | 56.59k | 85.23b | 0.59j | -33.59j |
坝燕6号Bayan No.6 | 86.12efg | 97.68ab | 1.33g | -16.36i |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | 96.56bc | 111.26a | 1.49f | -13.60hi |
太阳神Titan | 90.99cde | 111.12a | 1.26gh | -16.51i |
优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 94.66bcd | 106.06ab | 1.66e | -8.38de |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 80.68gh | 101.50ab | 1.13i | -13.66hi |
梦龙Magnum | 72.51ij | 87.62b | 1.10ij | -8.84def |
青甜1号Qingtian No.1 | 79.36h | 93.01ab | 1.17hi | -11.86gh |
福瑞至Forage plus | 70.36j | 91.21ab | 1.02k | -8.38de |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 88.88def | 92.32ab | 2.12c | 0.34a |
甜燕3号Tianyan No.3 | 77.95hi | 90.44ab | 1.14i | -12.02gh |
莫妮卡Monica | 82.16gh | 94.71ab | 1.26gh | -11.45fgh |
甜燕1号Tianyan No.1 | 90.88cde | 94.49ab | 1.66e | -9.20efg |
标准误Standard error | 1.860 | 1.508 | 0.007 | 0.228 |
P | <0.001 | 0.108 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
指标 Indexes | 主成分Principal component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
干物质DM | 0.240 | 0.546 | -0.629 | 0.303 |
粗脂肪EE | 0.185 | 0.468 | -0.067 | -0.254 |
粗蛋白CP | -0.370 | 0.822 | 0.107 | 0.175 |
粗灰分Ash | 0.061 | 0.397 | 0.163 | 0.486 |
可溶性糖SS | 0.599 | 0.074 | -0.387 | 0.368 |
中性洗涤纤维NDF | -0.972 | -0.017 | -0.135 | 0.121 |
酸性洗涤纤维ADF | -0.965 | 0.005 | -0.040 | -0.027 |
氨态氮NH3-N | -0.103 | 0.825 | 0.207 | -0.022 |
干物质降解率DMD | 0.503 | -0.675 | -0.187 | 0.366 |
72 h产气量Gas production within 72 h | -0.174 | -0.283 | 0.653 | 0.519 |
相对饲喂价值RFV | 0.976 | -0.027 | 0.148 | -0.103 |
相对饲草品质RFQ | 0.975 | -0.015 | 0.147 | -0.119 |
饲草分级指数GI | 0.762 | 0.556 | 0.257 | 0.000 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 5.246 | 2.884 | 1.221 | 1.003 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 40.355 | 22.182 | 9.396 | 7.712 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 40.355 | 62.537 | 71.933 | 79.645 |
Table 5 Loading factor, eigenvalue and contribution rate of principal component
指标 Indexes | 主成分Principal component | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
干物质DM | 0.240 | 0.546 | -0.629 | 0.303 |
粗脂肪EE | 0.185 | 0.468 | -0.067 | -0.254 |
粗蛋白CP | -0.370 | 0.822 | 0.107 | 0.175 |
粗灰分Ash | 0.061 | 0.397 | 0.163 | 0.486 |
可溶性糖SS | 0.599 | 0.074 | -0.387 | 0.368 |
中性洗涤纤维NDF | -0.972 | -0.017 | -0.135 | 0.121 |
酸性洗涤纤维ADF | -0.965 | 0.005 | -0.040 | -0.027 |
氨态氮NH3-N | -0.103 | 0.825 | 0.207 | -0.022 |
干物质降解率DMD | 0.503 | -0.675 | -0.187 | 0.366 |
72 h产气量Gas production within 72 h | -0.174 | -0.283 | 0.653 | 0.519 |
相对饲喂价值RFV | 0.976 | -0.027 | 0.148 | -0.103 |
相对饲草品质RFQ | 0.975 | -0.015 | 0.147 | -0.119 |
饲草分级指数GI | 0.762 | 0.556 | 0.257 | 0.000 |
特征值Eigenvalue | 5.246 | 2.884 | 1.221 | 1.003 |
贡献率Contribution rate (%) | 40.355 | 22.182 | 9.396 | 7.712 |
累计贡献率Cumulative contribution rate (%) | 40.355 | 62.537 | 71.933 | 79.645 |
品种Varieties | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 2.797 | -0.206 | -1.917 | 0.141 |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | -0.290 | -1.478 | -0.642 | 1.112 |
贝勒Baler | 0.573 | -1.406 | -0.014 | 1.113 |
牧王Haymaker | 0.669 | -2.324 | 0.537 | 1.349 |
悍马Hanma | 1.141 | -1.283 | -1.483 | -1.411 |
坝燕6号Bayan No.6 | -3.708 | -0.248 | -0.486 | 0.162 |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | -2.569 | -1.541 | 2.061 | -1.265 |
太阳神Titan | -3.369 | 0.698 | 0.696 | -0.699 |
优牧1号Youmu No.1 | -1.171 | -1.849 | 0.363 | 1.046 |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 0.184 | 1.502 | -0.168 | -0.579 |
梦龙Magnum | -2.137 | 1.250 | -0.906 | -0.319 |
青甜1号Qingtian No. 1 | 1.583 | 1.805 | -0.498 | 0.462 |
福瑞至Forage plus | -0.903 | -0.104 | -0.800 | -1.213 |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 1.594 | 3.913 | 1.878 | 0.950 |
甜燕3号Tianyan No.3 | 2.660 | 0.716 | 0.788 | -1.446 |
莫妮卡Monica | -1.611 | 1.931 | -0.645 | 1.078 |
甜燕1号Tianyan No.1 | 4.558 | -1.378 | 1.235 | -0.480 |
Table 6 Principal component scores of 17 oat varieties
品种Varieties | F1 | F2 | F3 | F4 |
---|---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 2.797 | -0.206 | -1.917 | 0.141 |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | -0.290 | -1.478 | -0.642 | 1.112 |
贝勒Baler | 0.573 | -1.406 | -0.014 | 1.113 |
牧王Haymaker | 0.669 | -2.324 | 0.537 | 1.349 |
悍马Hanma | 1.141 | -1.283 | -1.483 | -1.411 |
坝燕6号Bayan No.6 | -3.708 | -0.248 | -0.486 | 0.162 |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | -2.569 | -1.541 | 2.061 | -1.265 |
太阳神Titan | -3.369 | 0.698 | 0.696 | -0.699 |
优牧1号Youmu No.1 | -1.171 | -1.849 | 0.363 | 1.046 |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 0.184 | 1.502 | -0.168 | -0.579 |
梦龙Magnum | -2.137 | 1.250 | -0.906 | -0.319 |
青甜1号Qingtian No. 1 | 1.583 | 1.805 | -0.498 | 0.462 |
福瑞至Forage plus | -0.903 | -0.104 | -0.800 | -1.213 |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 1.594 | 3.913 | 1.878 | 0.950 |
甜燕3号Tianyan No.3 | 2.660 | 0.716 | 0.788 | -1.446 |
莫妮卡Monica | -1.611 | 1.931 | -0.645 | 1.078 |
甜燕1号Tianyan No.1 | 4.558 | -1.378 | 1.235 | -0.480 |
品种Varieties | μ1 | μ2 | μ3 | μ4 | D值D value | 排序Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 0.787 | 0.340 | 0.000 | 0.568 | 0.548 | 5 |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 0.414 | 0.136 | 0.321 | 0.915 | 0.374 | 10 |
贝勒Baler | 0.518 | 0.147 | 0.478 | 0.916 | 0.448 | 7 |
牧王Haymaker | 0.530 | 0.000 | 0.617 | 1.000 | 0.438 | 9 |
悍马Hanma | 0.587 | 0.167 | 0.109 | 0.013 | 0.358 | 11 |
坝燕6号Bayan No.6 | 0.000 | 0.333 | 0.360 | 0.575 | 0.191 | 17 |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | 0.138 | 0.126 | 1.000 | 0.065 | 0.229 | 16 |
太阳神Titan | 0.041 | 0.485 | 0.657 | 0.267 | 0.259 | 15 |
优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 0.307 | 0.076 | 0.573 | 0.892 | 0.331 | 12 |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 0.471 | 0.613 | 0.440 | 0.310 | 0.491 | 6 |
梦龙Magnum | 0.190 | 0.573 | 0.254 | 0.403 | 0.325 | 13 |
青甜1号Qingtian No.1 | 0.640 | 0.662 | 0.357 | 0.683 | 0.617 | 3 |
福瑞至Forage plus | 0.339 | 0.356 | 0.281 | 0.083 | 0.312 | 14 |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 0.641 | 1.000 | 0.954 | 0.857 | 0.799 | 1 |
甜燕3号Tianyan No.3 | 0.770 | 0.487 | 0.680 | 0.000 | 0.606 | 4 |
莫妮卡Monica | 0.254 | 0.682 | 0.320 | 0.903 | 0.444 | 8 |
甜燕1号Tianyan No.1 | 1.000 | 0.152 | 0.792 | 0.346 | 0.676 | 2 |
权重Weight | 0.507 | 0.279 | 0.118 | 0.097 | - | - |
Table 7 Membership function values of principal component scores, comprehensive index and ranking of 17 oat varieties
品种Varieties | μ1 | μ2 | μ3 | μ4 | D值D value | 排序Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
青甜2号Qingtian No.2 | 0.787 | 0.340 | 0.000 | 0.568 | 0.548 | 5 |
白燕7号Baiyan No.7 | 0.414 | 0.136 | 0.321 | 0.915 | 0.374 | 10 |
贝勒Baler | 0.518 | 0.147 | 0.478 | 0.916 | 0.448 | 7 |
牧王Haymaker | 0.530 | 0.000 | 0.617 | 1.000 | 0.438 | 9 |
悍马Hanma | 0.587 | 0.167 | 0.109 | 0.013 | 0.358 | 11 |
坝燕6号Bayan No.6 | 0.000 | 0.333 | 0.360 | 0.575 | 0.191 | 17 |
爱沃126 Everleaf 126 | 0.138 | 0.126 | 1.000 | 0.065 | 0.229 | 16 |
太阳神Titan | 0.041 | 0.485 | 0.657 | 0.267 | 0.259 | 15 |
优牧1号Youmu No.1 | 0.307 | 0.076 | 0.573 | 0.892 | 0.331 | 12 |
甜燕麦Sweet oat | 0.471 | 0.613 | 0.440 | 0.310 | 0.491 | 6 |
梦龙Magnum | 0.190 | 0.573 | 0.254 | 0.403 | 0.325 | 13 |
青甜1号Qingtian No.1 | 0.640 | 0.662 | 0.357 | 0.683 | 0.617 | 3 |
福瑞至Forage plus | 0.339 | 0.356 | 0.281 | 0.083 | 0.312 | 14 |
青海444 Qinghai 444 | 0.641 | 1.000 | 0.954 | 0.857 | 0.799 | 1 |
甜燕3号Tianyan No.3 | 0.770 | 0.487 | 0.680 | 0.000 | 0.606 | 4 |
莫妮卡Monica | 0.254 | 0.682 | 0.320 | 0.903 | 0.444 | 8 |
甜燕1号Tianyan No.1 | 1.000 | 0.152 | 0.792 | 0.346 | 0.676 | 2 |
权重Weight | 0.507 | 0.279 | 0.118 | 0.097 | - | - |
1 | Liu W H, Jia Z F, Liang G L. China’s forage oats industry development status and existing problems and suggestions. Qinghai Science and Technology, 2020, 27(3): 82-85. |
刘文辉, 贾志锋, 梁国玲. 我国饲用燕麦产业发展现状及存在的问题和建议. 青海科技, 2020, 27(3): 82-85. | |
2 | Zhao G Q, Shi S L. The current situation of oat research and production, problems and strategy in Tibetan Plateau. Pratacultural Science, 2004, 21(11): 17-21. |
赵桂琴, 师尚礼. 青藏高原饲用燕麦研究与生产现状、存在问题与对策. 草业科学, 2004, 21(11): 17-21. | |
3 | Shi J J, Ma Y S, Li Q Y, et al. Analysis on production performance of oat under different treatments in south region of Qinghai Province. Journal of Sichuan Grassland, 2004(1): 21-24. |
施建军, 马玉寿, 李青云, 等. 青南牧区不同处理下燕麦生产性能的分析. 四川草原, 2004(1): 21-24. | |
4 | Qi X M, Wei X J, Zhou X L, et al. Comparative experiment of 8 kinds of oat varieties in Qinghai Lake areas. Chinese Qinghai Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2020, 50(4): 35-39. |
祁星民, 魏希杰, 周学丽, 等. 青海省环湖地区8种燕麦品比试验. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2020, 50(4): 35-39. | |
5 | Pell A N, Schofield P. Computerized monitoring of gas production to measure forage digestion in vitro. Journal of Dairy Science, 1993, 76(4): 1063-1073. |
6 | Theodorou M K, Williams B A, Dhanoa M S, et al. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1994, 48(3): 185-197. |
7 | Mauricio R M, Mould F L, Dhanoa M S, et al. A semi-automated in vitro gas production technique for ruminant feedstuff evaluation. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 1999, 79(4): 321-330. |
8 | Guo Y J, Long R J, Zhang D G, et al. Determination of dry matter degradation of feeding shrubs and forages by gas production method. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2003, 12(2): 54-60. |
郭彦军, 龙瑞军, 张德罡, 等. 利用体外产气法测定高山牧草和灌木的干物质降解率. 草业学报, 2003, 12(2): 54-60. | |
9 | Guan Y X, Liu D, Zhang K C. Comparison of two kinds of nitrogen analyzers for determination of crude protein content in feed. Shanghai Journal of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, 2012, 181(3): 6-8. |
管姚香, 刘丹, 张克春. 两种定氮仪测定饲料粗蛋白含量的比较. 上海畜牧兽医通讯, 2012, 181(3): 6-8. | |
10 | Zhang L Y. Feed analysis and feed quality testing technology. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2007: 49-74. |
张丽英. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2007: 49-74. | |
11 | Van Soest P J, Robertson J B, Lewis B A. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 1991, 74(10): 3583-3597. |
12 | Wang Y T, Yang Z M, Liu J C, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance and nutritional quality of 21 oat varieties in northwest of Hebei Province. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1311-1318. |
王运涛, 杨志敏, 刘建成, 等. 冀西北地区21个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1311-1318. | |
13 | Li J, Nan M, Liu Y M, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the yield, quality and feeding performance on different oat varieties. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1089-1098. |
李晶, 南铭, 刘彦明, 等. 不同燕麦品种产量和品质及饲喂性能综合评价. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1089-1098. | |
14 | Hong M, Gao M, Lu D X, et al. New forage grading index: its establishment and comparative study on the evaluation of forage quality with the grading index-2001 (GI2001) and relative feed value (RFV). Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2011, 23(8): 143-146. |
红敏, 高民, 卢德勋, 等. 粗饲料品质评定指数新一代分级指数的建立及与分级指数(GI2001)和饲料相对值(RFV)的比较研究. 动物营养学报, 2011, 23(8): 143-146. | |
15 | Goering H K, Van Soest P J. Forage fiber analyses: Apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some applications. Washington: United States Agriculture Handbook, 1970: 379. |
16 | Jiang F, Lai Q, Gao Y H, et al. Effects of supplementing isobutyric acid, 2-methylbutyric acid and valeric acid on in vitro rumen fermentation parameters and nutrient degradation rates of yaks. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34(9): 5915-5930. |
姜菲, 赖琦, 高彦华, 等. 添加异丁酸, 2-甲基丁酸和戊酸对牦牛瘤胃体外发酵参数和养分降解率的影响. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34(9): 5915-5930. | |
17 | Feng Z C, Gao M. Improvement of colorimetric method for determination of ammonia nitrogen in rumen fluid. Inner Mongolian Journal of Animal Sciences and Production, 1993(4): 40-41. |
冯宗慈, 高民. 通过比色测定瘤胃液氨氮含量方法的改进. 内蒙古畜牧科学, 1993(4): 40-41. | |
18 | Tian H, Xiong H Q, Xiong J B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the production performance of 14 silage maize varieties by principal component analysis and subordinate function method. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2015, 37(2): 249-259. |
田宏, 熊海谦, 熊军波, 等. 采用主成分分析和隶属函数法综合评价14份青贮玉米品种的生产性能. 江西农业大学学报, 2015, 37(2): 249-259. | |
19 | Li S Q, Tian S L, Li M, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of the nutrition quality of 15 varieties of potatoes by principal component analysis and subordinate function method. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2020, 41(6): 272-276, 291. |
李守强, 田世龙, 李梅, 等. 主成分分析和隶属函数法综合评价15种(系)马铃薯的营养品质. 食品工业科技, 2020, 41(6): 272-276, 291. | |
20 | Tong Y S, Wang Y L, Wang P B, et al. Effects of sowing date on yield and quality of seven oat varieties in the high-cold area of Gande County, Qinghai Province. Grassland and Turf, 2021, 41(5): 52-62. |
童永尚, 王彦龙, 汪鹏斌, 等. 青海甘德县高寒区播期对7个燕麦品种产量和品质的影响. 草原与草坪, 2021, 41(5): 52-62. | |
21 | Wang P, Ma Y J, Gan H L, et al. Production performance and forage value evaluation of 14 kinds of forage oats at the northern foot of Qilian mountains. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2022, 41(6): 95-98. |
王鹏, 马垭杰, 甘辉林, 等. 祁连山北麓14个饲用燕麦生产性能及饲用价值评价. 畜牧兽医杂志, 2022, 41(6): 95-98. | |
22 | Zhuang K Z, Wu R H, Zhang C Y, et al. Evaluation of productivity of 11 oat varieties in Lunan region. Crop Research, 2022, 36(4): 313-326. |
庄克章, 吴荣华, 张春艳, 等. 11个饲用燕麦品种在鲁南地区的生产性能评价. 作物研究, 2022, 36(4): 313-326. | |
23 | Bao C L, Zhang S C. Comparison of productive characteristics of Avena sativa varieties in alpine region. Pratacultural Science, 2008, 25(10): 144-147. |
包成兰, 张世财. 高寒地区几种燕麦品种生产特性比较. 草业科学, 2008, 25(10): 144-147. | |
24 | Na Y, Wu R C, Li F, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of production performance of 15 oat varieties in south bank of Yellow River in western Inner Mongolia. Feed Research, 2022, 45(24): 97-101. |
那亚, 乌仁曹, 李峰, 等. 15个燕麦品种在内蒙古西部黄河南岸地区生产性能综合评价. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(24): 97-101. | |
25 | Fu T F, Gao X F, Qiao Z L, et al. Evaluation of agronomic traits and nutritional quality of forage oats in the Wumeng mountain cold area. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1071-1080. |
付廷飞, 高兴发, 乔正林, 等. 乌蒙山冷凉山区饲用燕麦农艺性状与营养品质评价.草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1071-1080. | |
26 | Li F, Li W L, Zhang C X, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of feeding value and productivity of spring sown oats in Ordos region. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2022, 44(12): 28-36. |
李峰, 李文龙, 张彩霞, 等. 鄂尔多斯地区春播燕麦饲用价值和生产力综合评价. 中国草地学报, 2022, 44(12): 28-36. | |
27 | Rohweder D A, Barnes R F, Jorgensen L. Proposed hay grading standards based on laboratory analyses for evaluating quality. Journal of Animal Science, 1978, 47(3): 747-759. |
28 | Zhang J K, Lu D X. Latest research progress on quality evaluation index of roughage. Contemporary Animal Husbandry, 2005(1): 24-26. |
张吉鹍, 卢德勋. 粗饲料品质评定指数的最新研究进展. 当代畜牧, 2005(1): 24-26. | |
29 | You Y J, Zhou H Z, Liu Y, et al. Comparison of nutritional value of oat hay, oat silage and Sichuan pasture for yaks. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(8): 99-110. |
游茵洁, 周浩珍, 刘垚, 等. 燕麦干草, 青贮燕麦与天然牧草饲喂牦牛的营养价值比较研究. 草业学报, 2022, 31(8): 99-110. | |
30 | Wang F, Xu Y J, Niu J L, et al. Nutrient value evaluation of different type feeds by in vitro gas production method. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2016, 43(1): 76-83. |
王芳, 徐元君, 牛俊丽, 等. 体外产气法评价反刍动物饲料营养价值的研究. 中国畜牧兽医, 2016, 43(1): 76-83. | |
31 | Du R P, Zhang L H, Song L W, et al. Rumen degradation and fermentation characteristics of different oat forages using in vitro technique. Feed Industry, 2023, 44(9): 56-62. |
杜瑞平, 张乐欢, 宋利文, 等. 不同品种燕麦牧草体外瘤胃降解和发酵特性的研究. 饲料工业, 2023, 44(9): 56-62. | |
32 | Li Y F, Hao J X, Ma Y Y, et al. Nutritive value evaluation of different types of feeds by in vitro ruminal fermentation method. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2013, 25(10): 2403-2413. |
李袁飞, 郝建祥, 马艳艳, 等. 体外瘤胃发酵法评定不同类型饲料的营养价值. 动物营养学报, 2013, 25(10): 2403-2413. | |
33 | Fan T. Study on intake and milk production of dairy cows fed diets that differed in diet NDF and forage NDF degradation. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2014. |
范铤. 日粮中NDF水平及粗饲料NDF降解率对奶牛采食量及生产性能的影响的研究. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2014. | |
34 | Wen Y F, Cao G J, Mao H M, et al. Effect of carbohydrate content on in vitro digestibility of leguminous shrub forage in different growth stages. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2009, 17(1): 101-105. |
文亦芾, 曹国军, 毛华明, 等. 不同生育期豆科饲用灌木碳水化合物含量及对体外消化率的影响. 草地学报, 2009, 17(1): 101-105. | |
35 | Ma L X, Yang M D, Cai L J, et al. Comparison of conventional nutrient composition and in vitro fermentation parameters of oat hay in different producing areas. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2023(4): 98-103. |
马利鑫, 杨梦蝶, 蔡立娟, 等. 不同产地燕麦干草常规营养成分及体外发酵参数的比较. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2023(4): 98-103. | |
36 | Si X M, Zhao D H, Sheng Y F, et al. Nutritional values of Elymus sibiricus Linn at different growing stages: Determined by the methods of in vitro gas production and Cornell net carbohydrate and protein system. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2015, 27(10): 3293-3301. |
司雪萌, 赵东辉, 盛宇飞, 等. 利用体外产气法及康奈尔净碳水化合物和蛋白质体系评价不同生育期老芒麦营养价值. 动物营养学报, 2015, 27(10): 3293-3301. | |
37 | Li B, Chen L, Ba S Z Z, et al. Study on in vitro fermentation characteristics of different pastures in Tibet. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2016, 28(6): 1804-1813. |
李斌, 陈亮, 巴桑珠扎, 等. 西藏地区不同牧草体外发酵特性研究. 动物营养学报, 2016, 28(6): 1804-1813. | |
38 | Yan X B. Digestibility of natural and cultivated grasslands by yaks in alpine pastoral region. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2000. |
严学兵. 牦牛对高寒牧区天然草地和人工草地牧草消化性的研究. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2000. | |
39 | Ma Q H, Li Y H, Liang L S, et al. Factor analysis and synthetical evaluation of the fruit quality of Dongzao (Ziziphus jujuba Mill. ‘Dongzao’) advanced selections. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(12): 2491-2499. |
马庆华, 李永红, 梁丽松, 等. 冬枣优良单株果实品质的因子分析与综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(12): 2491-2499. | |
40 | Zhuo X L, Wang L, Yu Z. Effects of lactic acid bacteria additives and harvest periods on quality of natural forage silage based on principal component analysis and membership function analysis. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2023, 35(7): 4719-4729. |
卓兴良, 王磊, 玉柱. 基于主成分分析和隶属函数法评价乳酸菌添加剂和收获时期对天然牧草青贮质量的影响. 动物营养学报, 2023, 35(7): 4719-4729. | |
41 | Zhang Z H, Wang Y Q, Ren G Y, et al. Evaluation of fermentation quality of corn straw silage treated with different additives based on principal component analysis and membership function analysis. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2022, 34(4): 2677-2688. |
张志恒, 王玉琴, 任国艳, 等. 基于主成分分析和隶属函数分析评价不同添加剂处理的玉米秸秆青贮的发酵品质. 动物营养学报, 2022, 34(4): 2677-2688. |
[1] | Ming-ming GU, Xing-hui JIANG, Zhi-yi MA, Shui-ling QIU, Hao-yu LIU, Ming-rui ZHANG, Jia-ning LU, Yu-jun QIU, Ben-zhi WANG, Qian-fu GAN. Degradation characteristics of sweet potato and taro in the rumen of Mindong goats and changes in microbial community attached to the surface [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(9): 169-184. |
[2] | Yuan MA, Huan LIU, Gui-qin ZHAO, Jing-long WANG, Ran ZHANG, Rui-rui YAO. Identification of the oat sHSP gene family and its transcript profiles in response to high temperature and aging [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(8): 145-158. |
[3] | Wen-pan DU, Gui-qin ZHAO, Ji-kuan CHAI, Li YANG, Jian-gui ZHANG, Yi-chao SHI, Guan-lu ZHANG. Effects of root separation on aboveground biomass, soil nutrient contents, and root characters of intercropped oat and pea [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(8): 25-36. |
[4] | Rui-juan SANG, Chao-jie CUI, Yun HE, Xiao-xia ZHANG, Jin YAO, Chun-yang DONG, Hao SUN, Ying-hua SHI, Xiao-yan ZHU, De-feng LI. Lodging resistance and production performance of 18 autumn-sown forage oat varieties in northern Henan Province [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(8): 74-85. |
[5] | Jiao-yun LU, Hong TIAN, Jun-bo XIONG, Xin-jiang WU, Yang LIU, He-shan ZHANG. A multi-trait evaluation of cold resistance of 14 native Pennisetum alopecuroides germplasm lines at the seedling stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(8): 98-111. |
[6] | Shang-lin YANG, Xuan WU, Qiao-hui LUO, Tai-hua HUANG, Zheng-fan ZHANG, Hai-tao SHI, Chun-hua GUO. A study of the protein requirements of 20-35 kg Chuanzhong black goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(7): 119-129. |
[7] | Zhao ZHANG, Ying-ying FU, Hao-wen SUN, Feng-xue SUN, Hui-fang YAN. Identification of seed vigor and evaluation of seed storability in different varieties of oat [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(6): 165-174. |
[8] | Chen MENG, Xue-li LU, Yi-ru SONG, Cheng-sheng ZHANG, Yi-qiang LI, Hai-qin XIANG, Zong-chang XU. Evaluation and identification of salt tolerance of 11 Leonurus germplasm lines at the seedling stage [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(5): 196-203. |
[9] | Jie ZHAO, Heng-guang CHEN, Xiao-meng PEI, Hao YU, Yin-ying XU, Da-gan MAO. Effects of resveratrol supplementation in the perinatal diet on production performance, blood indexes, and transcript abundance of genes encoding inflammatory factors in goats [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 210-220. |
[10] | Hong-fei LI, Bang-wei ZHOU, Miao ZHANG, Shu-nan SHI, Zhi-jian LI. Adaptability evaluation of different oat varieties introduced in the Hulunbuir region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 60-72. |
[11] | Ping MU, Ji-kuan CHAI, Wei-juan SU, Hai-long ZHANG, Gui-qin ZHAO. Phenotype and genetic variation analysis of forward and reverse hybrid progeny from different oat crosses [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(4): 73-86. |
[12] | Qin FENG, Xiao-li HE, Bin WANG, Teng-fei WANG, Wang NI, Xia MA, Xue-hua MING, Jian-qiang DENG, Jian LAN. A study of mixed sowing effects for oat and common vetch in the Ningxia Yellow River Irrigation Area [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(3): 107-119. |
[13] | Gen-sheng BAO, Yuan LI, Xiao-yun FENG, Peng ZHANG, Si-yu MENG. Interactive effects of intercropping patterns and nitrogen addition on root architectural characteristics of oat and pea in an alpine region [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(3): 73-84. |
[14] | Xue WANG, Xiao-jing LIU, Jing WANG, Yong WU, Chang-chun TONG. Root and carbon-nitrogen metabolism characteristics of alfalfa-oat mixed stands under continuous intercropping [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(3): 85-96. |
[15] | Wen-long LI, Feng LI, Zhong-juan ZHANG, Dian-qing WANG, Huan WANG, Hui-qing JIN, Mu-re TE, Zhi-ling HU, Ya TAO. A performance evaluation of two crops of forage oats per year in the northern Ordos Plateau [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2024, 33(1): 159-168. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||